UKA Group Research Articles

Predictors for activity following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Functional demands of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty are increasing. However, it remains unclear which patient-specific factors have an impact on postoperative activity and whether there is a difference between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (TKA/UKA). This retrospective study analyzed 1907 knees with TKA (n = 1746) or UKA (n = 161), implanted for primary osteoarthritis. Pain and activity (lower extremity activity scale, LEAS) were assessed 2years after surgery. High activity was defined as LEAS ≥ 14. Cohorts were compared using Kruskal-Wallis or Pearson-Chi-square test. A generalized least squares model was used to predict LEAS scores between cohorts adjusted for age, sex, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ASA score, and preoperative LEAS. There was no difference in pain 2years after surgery between UKA and TKA (p = 0.952). Preoperative LEAS was similar for UKA and TKA (p = 0.994), and both groups showed significant (p < 0.001 respectively) and similar improvements after surgery (p = 0.068). LEAS 2years after surgery was 11.1 (SD 3.2) for TKA and 11.9 (SD 3.5) for the UKA group (p = 0.004). After adjusting for preoperative LEAS, age, sex, BMI, CCI and ASA, the difference was not significant (p = 0.225). Male sex, lower BMI, higher preoperative LEAS, and younger age were associated with higher postoperative LEAS (p < 0.001, respectively). Patients can achieve a high level of activity following both TKA and UKA. While the postoperative activity level did not depend on the type of the procedure, younger age, male sex, lower BMI, and a higher preoperative activity level were associated with a higher postoperative activity level.

The relationship of C-reaktif protein level after knee artroplasty with gender difference and type of artroplasty.

It was aimed to reveal the relationship between CRP level after knee arthroplasty and gender difference and arthroplasty type. Preoperative and postoperative (1st and 7thday, 1st and 3rdmonths) CRP values of the patients who underwent TKA or UKA were examined. The data were compared by categorizing them into primary male-female, secondary TKA-UKA groups. 967 patients were included in the study (151 male, 685 female in the TKA group and 25 male, 106 female in the UKA group) In the TKA group, the mean age was 67.38 in males and 65.54 in females. In the UKA group, the mean age was 58.72 in males and 57,63 in females. CRP values were found to be statistically significantly lower in females compared to males in the preoperative period, postoperative 1st and 3rd months in patients who underwent TKA (p < .05). In the UKA group, it was found to be significantly lower in females in the preoperative period and at the postoperative 3rdmonth, p < .05). When the CRP values and their effect on the course of arthroplasty were evaluated according to the type of arthroplasty, there was no significant difference between the CRP values of the preoperative patients (p = .686). In addition, in the comparison made on the postoperative 1st day, 1st week, 1st month, and 3rdmonth, CRP values of the patient who underwent UKA were found to be significantly lower (p < .05). When analyzed separately by arthroplasty type, postoperative CRP values decreased to normal limits in 96.3% of patients who underwent TKA and 98.5% of patients who underwent UKA in the third month. Our study showed that the uncomplicated course of CRP after TKA and UKA is gender-specific, and higher CRP values are observed in males than in females. The UKA group exhibited significantly lower postoperative CRP levels than the TKA group.

Risk of revision in UKA versus HTO: a nationwide propensity score-matched study.

Our study aims to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors for subsequent revision in patients treated with UKA compared with those treated with HTO. In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2017. We compared patients who had undergone UKA or HTO as the primary surgical procedure longer than two years prior. We used multivariable logistic regression models to compare risk of revision between the groups after propensity matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Revision was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after primary UKA or HTO. In this study, 73,902 patients with UKA and 72,215 patients with HTO were identified after applying IPTW. The risk of revision during the entire study period was higher for patients with HTO than for patients with UKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42). Kaplan-Meier 8-years survival was 96.8% in the UKA group and 95.1% in the HTO group. Patients with HTO who were at higher risk of revision had advanced age (60-69years [HR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.76-2.67] and 70-79years [HR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.81-4.62]), female sex (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.66), CHF (HR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.25-7.78), COPD (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.34-2.10), PVD (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-2.78), and CVA or TIA (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.13-3.08) compared with those with UKA. Risk of revision was higher for patients with HTO than for patients with UKA. Risk factors for subsequent revision in patients with HTO were advanced age (60-69, 70-79), female sex, and comorbidities such as CHF, COPD, PVD, CVA, or TIA. However, orthopedic surgeons should also consider that TKA conversion from UKA has higher risk of revision than TKA conversion from HTO before choosing between UKA and HTO.

Distal femoral osteotomy versus lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty for isolated lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity: a propensity score-matched analysis

PurposeLateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) represent surgical solutions in cases of valgus malalignment and isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical results, complications, and the overall postoperative alignment of a series of DFO and lateral UKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up in active middle-aged patients.MethodsPatients with valgus knee and isolated lateral OA who underwent opening-wedge DFO or UKA from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Each patient was characterized by a joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 3° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) < 87°. We excluded patients who underwent meniscus or osteochondral allograft during DFO. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), complications, and postoperative alignment were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to identify comparable patients.ResultsThe DFO and lateral UKA groups consisted of 29 patients each. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of follow-up, or limb deformity were reported between the two groups. In the DFO group, OKS was reported to improve from 27.51 to 38.59 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 51.14 to 67.2 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in the UKA group, OKS improved from 26.23 to 35.43 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 50.12 to 65.91 (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in OKS and KOOS (delta) did not differ between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.95). The DFO and UKA groups were characterized by similar postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements of −3.26 and −3.00, respectively (p = 0.65). No patients in the UKA group underwent revision or other knee surgeries during follow-up. No infections were detected in either group. In the DFO group, no cases of nonunion or delayed union were reported. However, 40% of DFO patients underwent plate removal. One patient in each group was characterized by progression of medial OA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade > 3.ConclusionUKA and DFO represent an effective treatment in lateral knee OA with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity. Both surgeries were able to provide a significant and comparable clinical improvement.Level of evidence: III, comparative retrospective cohort study.

Which knee replacement do the patients forget? Unicondylar or total knee arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to determine which type of knee arthroplasty is easier to forget by comparing levels of joint awareness evaluated with the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) after unicondylar versus total knee arthroplasty. Patients who underwent either unicondylar or total knee arthroplasty due to primary gonarthrosis were retrospectively identified and then divided into 2 groups: the TKA group (218 patients; mean age = 68.93 ± 7.14 years) and the UKA group (131 patients; mean age = 60.39 ± 7.03 years). The status of joint awareness after knee replacement surgery was assessed using the Turkish version of the FJS-12 at the final follow-up by telephone interview. Also, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and The EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) scores were obtained to assess the clinical status of the patients. The mean follow-up was 2.8 years (range = 24-49 months) in the TKA group and 3.2 years (range = 24-50 months) in the UKA group. The FJS-12 was significantly higher in the UKA group (73.60 ± 9.95) than in the TKA group (64.88 ± 9.47) (P = .001). The WOMAC score was significantly better in the UKA group (81.39 ± 9.84) than in the TKA group (74.92 ± 9.99) (P = .001). No significant difference in EQ-5D existed between the groups (0.76 ± 0.14 for the TKA group, 0.79 ± 0.17 for the UKA group; P = .441). In terms of gender, the FJS-12 showed no differences between the groups; however, more favorable scores were recorded in younger patients with UKA. The results of this study have demonstrated that UKA may be better than TKA in terms of the patient perception of pain, stiffness, and physical functioning. Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

The Safety of Bilateral Simultaneous Hip and Knee Arthroplasty versus Staged Arthroplasty in a High-Volume Center Comparing Blood Loss, Peri- and Postoperative Complications, and Early Functional Outcome.

Purpose: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the use of simultaneous hip and knee arthroplasty compared to staged procedures in patients with bilateral pathology. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous and staged hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with bilateral pathology by assessing the transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin drop, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital complications, 30-day readmissions and early functional outcome. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA, THA and UKA by a single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center between 2015 and 2020 as simultaneous or staged procedures. Staged bilateral arthroplasties were performed within 12 months and were stratified by the time between procedures. Data were acquired through the electronic files at the Orthopädische Chirurgie München (OCM). For functional outcome, the ability of the patients to walk independently on the ward was compared with the ability to walk a set of stairs alone, which was recorded daily by the attending physiotherapist. Results: In total n = 305 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this study. One hundred and forty-five patients were allocated to the staged arthroplasty group. This group was subdivided into a hip and a knee group, whereas the knee group was split into TKA and UKA. The second staged procedure was performed within 12 months of the first procedure. One hundred and sixty patients were allocated to the simultaneous arthroplasty group. This group was also subdivided into a hip and knee group, whereas the knee group was split again into a TKA and UKA group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: There was no significant difference in the transfusion rate or complication rate. Secondarily, no statistically significant difference was found between the postoperative hemoglobin drop and the functional outcome, or in the length of stay (LOS) between both groups. Walking the stairs showed a significant difference in the knee group. Conclusions: There were no significant differences observed in the transfusion rate in-hospital complications, or readmission rate between both groups. The early functional outcome showed no significant difference in mobility for all groups. Simultaneous arthroplasty for knee or hip is as safe as a staged procedure, with no higher risk for the patient, in a specialized high-volume center. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Medial meniscus extrusion as a predictor for a poor prognosis in patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee

BackgroundRisk factors for the progression of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the meniscus and the prognosis of SONK. MethodsA total of 78 consecutive patients (female 85%; mean age 75.6 ± 7.2 years old) diagnosed with SONK were included. Of these, 30 patients did not receive surgery within 1 year from the onset of SONK (conservative group), while the remaining 48 patients underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to worsening of symptoms (UKA group). Using MRI findings obtained within 3 months of the onset, we compared the types of meniscus tear and medial meniscus extrusion between the conservative group and UKA group. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the cut-off value. ResultsPatients in the UKA group showed greater medial meniscus extrusion (absolute value, 4.2 mm ± 1.9 vs. 2.8 mm ± 1.2, P = 0.001; relative percentage of extrusion (RPE), 45.7% ± 21.5 vs. 30.7% ± 12.9, P = 0.001) and a higher prevalence of radial tear (P = 0.021) than those in the conservative group. In the multivariate analysis, RPE remained a relevant independent factor (P = 0.035) for future UKA. An ROC analysis found that the cut-off point of RPE was 33% (sensitivity, 81.2%; specificity, 63.3%). ConclusionRPE was a predictor of the prognosis of patients who underwent UKA within 1 year after the onset of SONK. Our results suggest that patients with RPE ≥ 33% are at high risk for progression.

Higher survival rate in total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy than that after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival rates and complications in TKA after UKA and HTO as compared with primary TKA using national health data. It was hypothesized that survival and complication rates would be worse in patients with a history of UKA or HTO compared to primary TKA. Based on a list of patients who underwent TKA from Korean National Health Insurance database, 315,071 underwent primary TKA (group A); 2177 TKA after HTO (group B); and 1284 TKA after UKA (group C). Revision rates were compared between the groups using log-rank tests and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of groups B and C were compared with those of the reference group (group A). A total of 1000 TKA matched patients were assigned to groups B and C according to propensity score for comparing revision rates after TKA and perioperative complication rates between TKA after HTO and UKA. The overall revision rate was 2.1% in group A, 2.0% in group B, and 4.2% in group C. The revision rate until 10years after TKA was significantly higher in group B (p = 0.03) or C (p < 0.0001) than in group A. The hazard ratios for revision was significantly higher in group A than in groups B and C at 10years after index TKA (1.4 in group B and 3.7 in group C). The result of the comparison using PSM between TKA after HTO and UKA showed that TKA after HTO had lower risk of revision than TKA after UKA (HR: 0.41 at 10years). However, no statistically significant differences in the perioperative complication rate between the two groups were found. (NS, not significant) CONCLUSIONS: TKA after UKA or HTO showed a significantly higher risk of revision than primary TKA. While TKA after HTO showed lower risk of revision than TKA after UKA, no significant differences in complications between TKA after UKA and HTO were found. Thus, surgeons must be aware of the low survival rate in TKA after UKA or HTO, especially in TKA after UKA. III (Retrospective cohort study).

Taux de révision précoce plus faible après une arthroplastie du genou unicompartimentale d’Oxford non cimentée versus la version cimentée de la prothèse unicompartimentale d’Oxford : méta-analyse

BackgroundUKA has been proved to offer good results in treating patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is still a controversy about the better fixation mode in UKA procedure between cemented and uncemented prosthesis. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of cemented versus uncemented Oxford UKA. HypothesisThe study surmised that uncemented Oxford UKA was associated with shorter operation time, higher function scores, lower revision rate and less radiolucency than cemented Oxford UKA. MethodsA meta-analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between cemented and uncemented Oxford UKA wsa conducted. The primary outcomes included Oxford knee score (OKS), revision rate, and incidence of radiolucency. The secondary outcomes included operation time, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China national knowledge infrastructure were searched until April, 2020 to identify studies for including. Relevant data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. ResultsWe identified nine studies involving 901 patients meeting our inclusion criteria. No significant difference of OKS was found in both groups. Compared with cemented group, uncemented Oxford UKA group was associated with lower revision rate (95 % CI: 0.90 to 3.73; OR=1.83) and less radiolucent lines (95 % CI: 0.79 to 9.52; OR=2.75) after following up for at least 2 years. The operation time was significantly shorter by 10.12min (95 % CI; p<0.00001) in the uncemented group when compared against the cemented group. The KSS, WOMAC, ROM were not significantly different between two groups. ConclusionsUncemented Oxford UKA had lower revision rate, shorter operation time and less radiolucent lines than cemented Oxford UKA did. There is still need for more long follow-up clinical trials with high evidence level to determine which method of fixation is of preferable for Oxford UKA in the future. Level of evidenceI.

Better short-term function after unicompartmental compared to total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite the aforementioned facts and it’s proven cost-effectiveness, there are still hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) as well as patient’s satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA.MethodsTo assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)).For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient’s age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed.ResultsThere was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%).Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p < 0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p < 0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019).ConclusionPatients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568. Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Medial abrasion syndrome: a neglected cause of persistent pain after knee arthroplasty

IntroductionPersistent post-operative pain (PPOP) has detracted from some otherwise successful knee arthroplasties. This study investigated medial abrasion syndrome (MAS) as a cause of PPOP after knee arthroplasty. The surgical techniques and outcomes of incorporating this concept into the management of both primary arthroplasty cases and patients suffering from unknown causes of PPOP after arthroplasties were presented.Materials and methodsIn a 1-year period, the author performed unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty (the UKA or TKA group) that also eliminated medial abrasion phenomenon (MAP) on 196 knees of 150 patients at advanced stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). During the same year, 16 knees of 16 patients with unknown causes of PPOP after knee arthroplasties were referred to the author for the arthroscopic medial release procedure (the AMR group) after being diagnosed as MAS. Subjective satisfaction, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluations were used for outcome study.ResultsAll 166 patients were followed for more than 3 years (mean 3.7 years, 3.1–4.2) for the outcome study. All knees receiving arthroplasty showed medial plicae with MAP at the time of surgery. Only 2 of them suffered from PPOP: one was a neglected tibial plateau fracture with residual varus deformity after UKA, and the other was a late infection after TKA and received revision. The satisfactory rate was 98.8% in the UKA group, 99.1% in the TKA group, and 100% in the AMR group. The Knee Society Scores and all subscales of KOOS were statistically improved in all groups.ConclusionsMAS is a cause of pain in patients who have received knee arthroplasties, and MAP should be eliminated to ensure a successful knee arthroplasty. PPOP after knee arthroplasty can be caused by MAS, which can be managed by AMR.

Pain management of unicompartmental (UKA) vs. total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on a matched pair analysis of 4144 cases

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty are well established treatment options for end-stage osteoarthritis, UKA still remains infrequently used if you take all knee arthroplasties into account. An important factor following knee arthroplasty is pain control in the perioperative experience, as high postoperative pain level is associated with persistent postsurgical pain. There is little literature which describes pain values and the need for pain medication following UKA and/or TKA. So far, no significant difference in pain has been found between UKA and TKA. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in the postoperative course in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs. total knee arthroplasty regarding the need for pain medication and patient-reported outcomes including pain scores and side effects. We hypothesized that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to total knee arthroplasty in terms of postoperative pain values and the need of pain medication. In this project, we evaluated 2117 patients who had unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 3798 who had total knee arthroplasty performed, from 2015 to 2018. A total of 4144 patients could be compared after performing the matched pair analysis. A professional team was used for data collection and short patient interviews to achieve high data quality on the first postoperative day. Parameters were compared after performing a 1:1 matched pair analysis, multicenter-wide in 14 orthopedic departments. Pain scores were significantly lower for the UKA group than those of the TKA group (p < 0.001 respectively for activity pain, minimum and maximum pain). In the recovery unit, there was less need for pain medication in patients with UKA (p = 0.004 for non-opioids). The opiate consumption was similarly lower for the UKA group, but not statistically significant (p = 0.15). In the ward, the UKA group needed less opioids (p < 0.001). Patient subjective parameters were significantly better for UKA. After implantation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, patients showed lower pain scores, a reduced need for pain medication and better patient subjective parameters in the early postoperative course in this study.

A comparative study of the curative effect of proximal fibular osteotomy and single condylar replacement for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis of different severity

To compare the clinical effect of proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) and single condyle replacement (UKA) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis of different severity. From June 2015 to September 2017, 53 patients with knee osteoarthritis were analyzed retrospectively. According to the operation mode, they were divided into PFO group (26 cases) and UKA group (27 cases) . According to Kellygren-Lawrence imaging classification standard：PFO group, 5 cases of gradeⅡ, 11 cases of grade Ⅲ, 10 cases of grade Ⅳ; UKA group, 7 cases of gradeⅡ, 9 cases of grade Ⅲ, 11 cases of grade Ⅳ. The amount of intraoperative bleeding, operation time and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up regularly in the outpatient clinic before operation, 3 months after operation and 1 year after operation. The WOMAC score and the angle of tibiofemoral angle at each time point in the same group were compared, and the OMAC score and the angle of tibiofemoral angle at each time between the two groups were compared. Fifty-three patients were followed up for 12 to 24 (16.6±4.8) months. Compared with UKA group, PFO group had less intraoperative bleeding, shorter operative time and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) . The scores of pain, stiffness and body function in UKA group were better than those in PFO group (P<0.05) . After 3 months and 1 year, the WOMAC index in PFO group was significantly improved (P<0.05) ; after 3 months and 1 year, the WOMAC index in UKA group was significantly better than that in PFO group (P<0.05) ; after 3 months, the WOMAC index in PFO group was significantly better than that in UKA group (P<0.05) . The tibiofemoral angle of gradeⅡand Ⅲ patients in both groups decreased gradually (P<0.05) ; the tibiofemoral angle of grade Ⅳ patients in UKA group was smaller than that of grade Ⅳ patients in PFO group (P<0.05) . Compared with UKA, PFO has the advantages of small trauma, fast recovery and low cost. The curative effect of PFO is equal to or more than UKA in the patients with gradeⅡand Ⅲ knee osteoarthritis. It is an alternative surgical method for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes in Unicompartmental Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographically Matched Cohort Analysis.

Background:Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA) have demonstrated excellent mid- and long-term outcomes and have been compared in clinical series for decades; however, to our knowledge, no study has sufficiently matched UKA and TKA cohorts on preoperative osteoarthritis severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes of radiographically and demographically matched UKA and TKA cohorts.Methods:One hundred and thirty-five UKAs and 135 TKAs were matched by patient age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification as well as preoperative osteoarthritis severity in medial and lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments (Kellgren-Lawrence grading system). Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, function, activity level, and satisfaction were evaluated at minimum 1-year follow-up via components of the modern Knee Society Score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity-level score, and a Likert satisfaction scale.Results:The patients in the UKA group reported significantly less pain, a higher activity level, and greater satisfaction while performing several functional activities and could walk for a longer amount of time before stopping due to knee discomfort compared with those in the TKA group (p ≤ 0.038). In addition, a greater proportion of patients in the UKA than in the TKA group were “satisfied or very satisfied” with their knee replacement surgery at minimum 1-year follow-up (90% versus 81%; p = 0.043).Conclusions:With minimum 1-year follow-up, patients who underwent UKA reported significantly higher function, less pain, and a greater level of patient satisfaction than a radiographically and demographically matched TKA cohort.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Early post-operative opioid consumption: A comparison between medial unicompartmental, patellofemoral, and total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundWhile there is emerging literature describing the use of narcotics for post-operative pain control following TKA, little data is available regarding narcotic use in partial knee replacements. The aim of this study is to compare the early post-operative narcotic requirements after medial compartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) with that of TKA. MethodsIn this retrospective chart review, we identified 37 patients who underwent PFA and 71 patients who underwent UKA. We identified a cohort of TKA patients who were matched to the unicompartmental group based on sex and age (n = 108). The primary outcome measure was self-reported use of opioids for pain management at the first post-operative clinic visit. Opioid use between groups was compared using Chi-square analysis. ResultsThe PFA group was younger (p < 0.001) and consisted of more females (p < 0.001) than the UKA group. The UKA cohort had more non-smoking patients (p = 0.044) compared to the PFA cohort. Self-reported opioid use at the first post-operative visit differed between the three groups of patients (p < 0.001). A greater proportion of both PFA (38% vs. 11%; p < 0.001) and TKA (41% vs. 11%; p = 0.01) patients reported opioid use when compared to UKA patients. No differences in opioid use existed between TKA and PFA groups (p = 0.61). ConclusionThe prevalence of PFA patients who report opioid use at the first post-operative visit is similar to that for patients following TKA, suggesting that pain management protocols for this specific subset of partial knee arthroplasty patients should be structured similar to TKA patients and separate from UKA patients.

Is cocontraction a potential cause of tibial internal rotation restriction in patients with knee endoprostheses?

Aims and Objectives: The ischiocrural muscles play an important role in the rotation of the tibia. The main objective of the study was to examine the extent to which an increased cocontraction of the SEMITEN and BIZFEM in patients with bicondylar (TKA) and unicondylar prostheses (UKA) under the influence of everyday forms of stress restricts the tibial rotation. Materials and Methods: 3-D-motion analysis in patients after TKA or UKA was performed to record joint kinematics before and after knee prosthesis. Inclusion criteria: Age 50-70 years, no other prostheses, BMI &lt;31, no relevant diseases, surgery - period 04/2015 to 04/2016. Out of a total of 550 patients finally 22 patients (w:11/m:11) could be included: TKA (n = 11), UKA (n = 9). To imitate various movement patterns of ADL, a parcour was built with a ramp and a staircase with 3 steps. Kinematic data were recorded with 10 infrared 100 Hz cameras. Muscular activities were measured bilaterally with a wireless EMG system (1000 Hz, myon320, muon, CH). Walking speed was collected through a time-gate system (WEKO, Weitmann &amp; Konrad GmbH &amp; Co. KG, DE). Static analysis was performed by statistical nonparametric assignment (SnPM). The WOMAC score was used for subjective assessment of dysfunctions. Results: In normal walking, there was no difference in tibial rotation compared to the non-operated knee in either the TKA or the UKA group. In SnPM analysis, statistically significantly reduced tibial rotation was shown on the downturn of a ramp in the TKA group at the operated knee. The UKA group showed no significant differences on the ramp to the non-operated knee. Concerning co-contraction of the SEMITEN and BIZFEM in the EMG analysis in the operated knee joint, no deviation from the non-operated knee could be shown. When climbing stairs, the SnPM internal rotation analysis revealed significant differences between the TKA and the UKA group (stance phase). Similar to the group comparement a restricted axial rotational movement compared to an operated to non - operated knee joint in the TKA - group could be show.n Especially during the stairway, the knee internal rotation of the prosthesis was impaired compared to the non-operated knee. On the other hand, when climbing stairs, the internal rotation was mostly significantly reduced during the stance phase. The SnPM analysis showed statistically significant asymmetries in the UKA group during stairway walking. The disturbed internal rotational movement showed the UKA group in the operated knee joint compared to the un-operated knee joint to the same extent as the TKA group only during the run down from the ramp. Conclusion: The assumption that cocontractions between the SEMITEN and the BIZFEM contributes to the impairment of internal rotation can not be confirmed from the data available to us. Other influences must be the cause.

High Tibial Osteotomy versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthrosis with Kissing Lesions in Relatively Young Patients.

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) in advanced medial compartment arthritis accompanied by kissing lesions in relatively young patients.Materials and MethodsForty-five patients were divided into the HTO (n=23) and UKA (n=22) groups. Clinically, we evaluated the Lysholm knee scoring scale, visual analogue scale, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index scores preoperatively, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. Radiographically, we measured the femoral-tibial angle and mechanical axis deviation preoperatively and at the final follow-up.ResultsAll clinical outcomes gradually improved in both groups from the postoperative period to the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, all clinical outcomes were slightly better in the UKA group than in the HTO group; however, differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionsHTO is comparable to UKA in terms of clinical outcomes. Thus, the results of this study suggest that HTO might be a good alternative treatment to UKA for medial unicompartmental arthritis accompanied by kissing lesions in relatively young patients.

Prothèse unicompartimentaire du genou bilatérale simultanée versus prothèse totale de genou unilatérale. Comparaison des pertes sanguines, des complications préopératoires, de la durée de séjour et de la récupération fonctionnelle

BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a good alternative treatment option to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for single compartment knee osteoarthritis. Several recent reports suggest that UKA results in more rapid functional recovery than TKA, together with fewer complications. Few performed a comparison of bilateral simultaneous UKA and unilateral TKA. HypothesisBilateral simultaneous UKA would result in fewer perioperative complications, less blood loss, less transfusion and faster recovery of short-term clinical outcomes, compared with unilateral TKA patients. Material and methodsIn a retrospective trial, the bilateral simultaneous UKA (bUKA) cases were matched one to onewith a cohort of unilateral TKA (uTKA) cases according to age, body mass index, gender, Kellgren-Lawrence grade of knee osteoarthritis and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. In bilateral simultaneous UKA group, patients had KL grade 4 of bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and in unilateral TKA group, patients had KL grade 4 of unilateral knee osteoarthritis. The transfusion requirements, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of hospital stay, incidence of complications, and knee clinical scores of the bUKA and uTKA groups were compared at the 6-month short-term follow-up. ResultsPatients were categorized into the bUKA group (n=52) and uTKA group (n=52). The number of patients requiring transfusion and the amount of EBL was smaller in the bUKA group (P<0.001 for transfusion and P=0.043 for EBL). The duration of hospital stay was shorter and the number of complications was smaller in the bUKA group (P<0.001 for hospital stay and P=0.028 for complications). The clinical outcomes were also superior in the bUKA group (P<0.001). ConclusionsBilateral simultaneous UKA shows fewer perioperative complications, less blood loss, less transfusion, and better functional outcomes at 6 months postoperatively than unilateral TKA. The data suggest that bilateral simultaneous UKA can be performed safely, and results in acceptable clinical outcomes. Level of evidenceIII, case-control study.

Bilateral simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of the amount of blood loss and transfusion, perioperative complications, hospital stay, and functional recovery

BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a good alternative treatment option to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for single compartment knee osteoarthritis. Several recent reports suggest that UKA results in more rapid functional recovery than TKA, together with fewer complications. Few performed a comparison of bilateral simultaneous UKA and unilateral TKA. HypothesisBilateral simultaneous UKA would result in fewer perioperative complications, less blood loss, less transfusion and faster recovery of short-term clinical outcomes, compared with unilateral TKA patients. Material and methodsIn a retrospective trial, the bilateral simultaneous UKA (bUKA) cases were matched one to one with a cohort of unilateral TKA (uTKA) cases according to age, body mass index, gender, Kellgren-Lawrence grade of knee osteoarthritis and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. In bilateral simultaneous UKA group, patients had KL grade 4 of bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and in unilateral TKA group, patients had KL grade 4 of unilateral knee osteoarthritis. The transfusion requirements, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of hospital stay, incidence of complications, and knee clinical scores of the bUKA and uTKA groups were compared at the 6-month short-term follow-up. ResultsPatients were categorized into the bUKA group (n=52) and uTKA group (n=52). The number of patients requiring transfusion and the amount of EBL was smaller in the bUKA group (P<0.001 for transfusion and P=0.043 for EBL). The duration of hospital stay was shorter and the number of complications was smaller in the bUKA group (P<0.001 for hospital stay and P=0.028 for complications). The clinical outcomes were also superior in the bUKA group (P<0.001). ConclusionsBilateral simultaneous UKA shows fewer perioperative complications, less blood loss, less transfusion, and better functional outcomes at 6 months postoperatively than unilateral TKA. The data suggest that bilateral simultaneous UKA can be performed safely, and results in acceptable clinical outcomes. Level of evidenceIII, case-control study.

Knee OUTcome Study: A Comparison of the Patient Perceived Outcome between High Tibial Osteotomy, Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Osteoarthitis in Men under age 55.

Objectives:Managing medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in the younger male patient is challenging because these patients tend to be physically high demand. Traditionally, High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) has been the favoured surgical option, but Total (TKA) and Unicompartmental (UKA) knee arthroplasty have been more recently utilized. Our aims were to compare patient reported outcome, revision and reoperation rates with these 3 procedures.Methods:Using our hospital data bases we retrieved the details of male patients under 55 who had one of the 3 procedures performed between 2005-2013, for medial compartment OA by 6 knee surgeons in our group. All 6 surgeons used the 3 procedures in this cohort. The TKA database was analysed to exclude patients who did not meet the criteria for HTO/UKA of isolated medial OA. The 3 groups had their satisfaction assessed retrospectively using the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), information on occupation, reoperation and duration of satisfaction were also questioned. Hospital records were reviewed for the reoperation and revision rate on all of the patients identified.Results:We identified 117 TKA in patients under 55, 27 TKA which met our criteria, 75 HTO (medial opening wedge) and 95 UKA (Oxford cementless). The mean followup periods for HTO/UKA/TKA were 8.1, 6.1, 7.5 years respectively. Of the HTO group, 19 (25%) were revised to TKA at a mean 4.8 years, 8 underwent reoperation for mal/nonunion, and 10 had reoperation for fixation issues. Overall a reoperation rate of 50% and projected 10 year survivorship of 58% for HTO. Of the UKA group, there was 1 revision to TKA at 1 year for tibial component loosening and 3 reoperations for bearing instability, retaining the primary implant. Reoperation rate 4% and projected 10 year survivorship 99%. Of the TKA group there were 2 revisions at 4 years for tibial component loosening, no non-revision reoperations, reoperation rate 7.5% with projected 10 year survivorship 92.5%. The Forgotten Joint Score results (0-100) were median 21 for HTO, 38 for TKA, 67 for UKA. All comparisons between the three groups were significant. TKA vs HTO p value 0.04 (CI 0.67-36.54), UKA vs TKA p value 0.02 (CI 2.26-35.58), UKA vs HTO p value 0.00001 (CI 25.36-49.68). Further analysis of the HTO cohort revealed that 75% of the unrevised cases considered the benefit of the index procedure had expired at a mean 3.1 years, yet they had not sought further surgery, despite a mean FJS of only 18 in this subgroup.Conclusion:In this retrospective cohort study with medium term followup of 3 procedures performed by 6 knee surgeons, patients were highly matched by virtue of gender (male), age (<55 years), activity level (Tegner scores), pathology (isolated medial compartment OA). Regarding survivorship of the index procedure, the outcome for Osteotomy was poor with 58% at 10 yrs and high reoperation/complication rate of 50% at mean 4.8 years. The best survivorship/reoperation rates were in the UKA group (99% and 4% respectively). Regarding patient reported outcome using Forgotten Joint Score, comparison between all groups favoured UKA. The comparison between UKA and Osteotomy was so powerful, as to render the p value almost unmeasureable (0.00001). Unrevised Osteotomy patients reported disappointing duration of benefit (mean 3.1 years), and low FJS (mean 18), but hadn’t sought further surgery. A further example that revision rates are not a good indicator of outcome, especially for Osteotomy. Our study demonstrates that at medium term followup, cementless Oxford UKA provides the best outcome with respect to patient satisfaction, function and survivorship compared to Osteotomy and TKA in men under 55 yrs with medial compartment osteoarthritis.