Ubiquitination Of Lysine Residues Research Articles

DNA Damage-Induced Phosphorylation of Histone H2A at Serine 15 Is Linked to DNA End Resection.

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs in chromatin, and several histone posttranslational modifications have been implicated in the process. Modifications of the histone H2A N-terminal tail have also been linked to DNA damage response, through acetylation or ubiquitination of lysine residues that regulate repair pathway choice. Here, we characterize a new DNA damage-induced phosphorylation on chromatin, at serine 15 of H2A in yeast. We show that this SQ motif functions independently of the classical S129 C-terminal site (γ-H2A) and that mutant-mimicking constitutive phosphorylation increases cell sensitivity to DNA damage. H2AS129ph is induced by Tel1ATM and Mec1ATR, and the loss of Lcd1ATRIP or Mec1 signaling decreases γ-H2A spreading distal to the DSB. In contrast, H2AS15ph is completely dependent on Lcd1ATRIP, indicating that this modification only happens when end resection is engaged. This is supported by an increase in replication protein A (RPA) and a decrease in DNA signal near the DSB in H2A-S15E phosphomimic mutants, indicating higher resection. In mammals, this serine is replaced by a lysine (H2AK15) which undergoes an acetyl-monoubiquityl switch to regulate binding of 53BP1 and resection. This regulation seems functionally conserved with budding yeast H2AS15 and 53BP1-homolog Rad9, using different posttranslational modifications between organisms but achieving the same function.

HAT/HDAC: The epigenetic regulators of inflammatory gene expression (Review)

Inflammation is a condition through which the body responds to infection or tissue injury. It is typically characterized by the expression of a plethora of genes involved in inflammation, that are regulated by transcription factors, transcriptional co‑regulators, and chromatin remodeling events. Differential mitotically heritable patterns of gene expression without changes in the DNA sequence are essentially controlled by epigenetic regulation. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone modifications and DNA methylation have a profound effect on inflammatory gene transcription. Histone protein modifications, which include acetylation and the ubiquitination of lysine residues, the methylation of lysine and arginine, and the phosphorylation of serine have been found to modulate chromatin dynamics, thus altering the levels of gene expression. Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) regulate the addition and removal of acetyl groups from lysine residues on histones respectively. Nuclear factor <em>(NF)‑κB</em>, tumor necrosis factor <em>(TNF)‑α</em> and interleukin <em>(IL)‑6</em> are the pro‑inflammatory genes known to promote inflammatory responses in cells. By contrast, 15‑lipoxygenase‑1 <em>(15‑LOX‑1)</em> and monoamine oxidase‑A <em>(MAO‑A)</em> are the genes that can act against inflammation in certain specific conditions. 15‑LOX‑1, a lipid peroxidative enzyme, is associated with the development of inflammatory disorders, such as atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma and renal injury. MAO‑A catalyzes degradation of biogenic amines and has been reported to cause oxidative stress, atherosclerosis and neuroinflammation. 15‑LOX‑1 has been shown to be co‑expressed along with MAO‑A, in both primary human monocytes and A549 lung carcinoma cells upon treatment with Th2 cytokines, such as IL‑4 and IL‑13. The present review aimed to discuss the HAT‑ and HDAC‑mediated epigenetic machinery which governs the expression of pro‑inflammatory genes, such as <em>IL‑6</em>, <em>TNF‑α</em>, etc., as well as the expression of anti‑inflammatory genes, such as <em>15‑LOX‑1</em> and <em>MAO‑A</em>, responsible for modulating the process of inflammation. On the whole, the present review aims to provide deeper insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in the epigenetic regulation of inflammation, which may have novel implications in designing small molecule inhibitors that target the epigenetic machinery for the effective treatment of a variety of inflammation‑related diseases.

Proteasome inhibition creates a chromatin landscape favorable to RNA Pol II processivity

Proteasome inhibition creates a chromatin landscape favorable to RNA Pol II processivity

The Misfolded Protein Client as a Determinant of Substrate Ubiquitination by the Hsp70/CHIP Complex

The E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP (carboxy terminus of Hsc70 interacting protein) targets misfolded proteins chaperoned by heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) for ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Hsp70 recruits and attempts to refold misfolded proteins, or “clients”, in iterative, ATP‐dependent cycles. In contrast, binding of Hsp70 to the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain of CHIP, allows for client proteins to be recruited for ubiquitination by CHIP. Ubiquitination of lysine residues on a client protein allows CHIP/Hsp70 complexes to promote the proteasomal degradation of the client. Thus, the CHIP/Hsp70 complex stands at the crossroads of degradative and refolding pathways of client proteins which is crucial for cellular protein quality control. The current knowledge in the field lacks a clear understanding of how the CHIP/Hsp70 complex executes its triage mechanism that directs misfolded proteins for either refolding or degradation. Recent models of ATP and ADP bound Hsp70 revealed the distances between the substrate binding domain (SBD) and the E2~ubiquitin conjugate active site as ~120 Å and ~60 Å respectively. This implies, with the dynamic conformational changes of Hsp70 complex, the ADP‐bound state of Hsp70 organizes the chaperoned ubiquitination complex by properly orienting the client with respect to CHIP which allows the client protein to span this 60 Å gap and accept the ubiquitin from the bound E2‐ubiquitin conjugate. Therefore, the distance between Hsp70 binding site and the active site of the E2~ubiquitin conjugate bound to CHIP plays a significant role as a determinant in the triage mechanism of CHIP/Hsp70. In this study, we focus on investigating the relationship between key distances within the CHIP/Hsp70/client complex and the ubiquitination activity of the CHIP/Hsp70 complex by utilizing in‐vitro ubiquitination assays of modified substrates.Support or Funding InformationNSF 15‐52113This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0 induces CD83 degradation in mature dendritic cells independent of its E3 ubiquitin ligase function

Mature dendritic cells (mDCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells known today, as they are the only antigen-presenting cells able to induce naïve T-cells. Therefore, they play a crucial role during the induction of effective antiviral immune responses. Interestingly, the surface molecule CD83 expressed on mDCs is targeted by several viruses. As CD83 has been shown to exert co-stimulatory functions on mDCs, its downmodulation represents a viral immune escape mechanism. Mechanistically, it has been shown that herpes simplex virus type 1 infection leads to proteasomal degradation of CD83, resulting in a strongly diminished T-cell stimulatory capacity of the infected mDC. Previous data suggest that the viral immediate-early protein ICP0 (infected-cell protein 0) plays an important role in this process. In the present study, we showed that ICP0 is sufficient to induce CD83 degradation in the absence of any other viral factor. However, the mechanism of ICP0-mediated CD83 degradation is not yet understood. Here, we provide evidence that ubiquitination of lysine residues is, despite the published E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of ICP0, not necessary for CD83 degradation. This finding was underlined by the observation that expression of an ICP0 mutant lacking the E3 ubiquitin ligase domain in mDCs still induced CD83 degradation. Finally, inhibition of E1 activating enzyme using the specific inhibitor 4[4-(5-nitro-furan-2-ylmethylene)-3.5-dioxo-pyrazolidin-1-yl]-benzoic acid ethyl ester did not prevent CD83 degradation. Taken together, our data provide strong evidence that ICP0 alone induces CD83 degradation independent of its E3 ubiquitin ligase function and of the ubiquitin machinery.

Mechanisms of mono- and poly-ubiquitination: Ubiquitination specificity depends on compatibility between the E2 catalytic core and amino acid residues proximal to the lysine

Ubiquitination involves the attachment of ubiquitin to lysine residues on substrate proteins or itself, which can result in protein monoubiquitination or polyubiquitination. Ubiquitin attachment to different lysine residues can generate diverse substrate-ubiquitin structures, targeting proteins to different fates. The mechanisms of lysine selection are not well understood. Ubiquitination by the largest group of E3 ligases, the RING-family E3 s, is catalyzed through co-operation between the non-catalytic ubiquitin-ligase (E3) and the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), where the RING E3 binds the substrate and the E2 catalyzes ubiquitin transfer. Previous studies suggest that ubiquitination sites are selected by E3-mediated positioning of the lysine toward the E2 active site. Ultimately, at a catalytic level, ubiquitination of lysine residues within the substrate or ubiquitin occurs by nucleophilic attack of the lysine residue on the thioester bond linking the E2 catalytic cysteine to ubiquitin. One of the best studied RING E3/E2 complexes is the Skp1/Cul1/F box protein complex, SCFCdc4, and its cognate E2, Cdc34, which target the CDK inhibitor Sic1 for K48-linked polyubiquitination, leading to its proteasomal degradation. Our recent studies of this model system demonstrated that residues surrounding Sic1 lysines or lysine 48 in ubiquitin are critical for ubiquitination. This sequence-dependence is linked to evolutionarily conserved key residues in the catalytic region of Cdc34 and can determine if Sic1 is mono- or poly-ubiquitinated. Our studies indicate that amino acid determinants in the Cdc34 catalytic region and their compatibility to those surrounding acceptor lysine residues play important roles in lysine selection. This may represent a general mechanism in directing the mode of ubiquitination in E2 s.

Cumulative Mutations of Ubiquitin Acceptor Sites in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Cause a Late Budding Defect

The p6 domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag has long been known to be monoubiquitinated. We have previously shown that the MA, CA, and NC domains are also monoubiquitinated at low levels (E. Gottwein and H. G. Krausslich, J. Virol. 79:9134-9144, 2005). While several lines of evidence support a role for ubiquitin in virus release, the relevance of Gag ubiquitination is unclear. To directly address the function of Gag ubiquitination, we constructed Gag variants in which lysine residues in the NC, SP2, and p6 domains were mutated to arginine either in individual domains or in combination. Using these mutants, we showed that in addition to MA, CA, NC, and p6, SP2 is also mono- or di-ubiquitinated at levels comparable to those of the other domains. Replacement of all lysine residues in only one of the domains had minor effects on virus release, while cumulative mutations in NC and SP2 or in NC and p6 resulted in an accumulation of late budding structures, as observed by electron microscopy analysis. Strikingly, replacement of all lysine residues downstream of CA led to a significant reduction in virus release kinetics and a fivefold accumulation of late viral budding structures compared to wild-type levels. These results indicate that ubiquitination of lysine residues in Gag in the vicinity of the viral late domain is important for HIV-1 budding, while no specific lysine residue may be needed and individual domains can functionally substitute. This is consistent with Gag ubiquitination being functionally involved in a transient protein interaction network at the virus budding site.

Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Ubiquitination

Ubiquitin is important for the release of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and several other retroviruses, but the functional significance of Gag ubiquitination is unknown. To address this problem, we decided to analyze Gag ubiquitination in detail. A low percentage of the HIV-1 p6 protein has previously been shown to be ubiquitinated, and published mutagenesis data suggested that Gag ubiquitination is largely lost upon mutation of the two lysine residues in p6. In this study, we show that Gag proteins lacking the p6 domain or the two lysine residues within p6 are ubiquitinated at levels comparable to those of the wild-type Gag protein. We detected monoubiquitinated forms of the matrix (MA), capsid (CA), and nucleocapsid (NC) proteins in mature virus preparations. Protease digestion of Gag polyproteins extracted from immature virions indicated that ubiquitinated MA, CA, and possibly NC are as abundant as ubiquitinated p6. The HIV-1 late-domain motifs PTAP and LRSLF were not required for Gag ubiquitination, and mutation of the PTAP motif even resulted in an increase in the amount of Gag-Ub conjugates detected. Finally, at steady state, ubiquitinated Gag proteins were not enriched in either membrane-associated or virus-derived Gag fractions. In summary, these results indicate that HIV-1 Gag can be monoubiquitinated in all domains and that ubiquitination of lysine residues outside p6 may thus contribute to viral release and/or infectivity.

Acetylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 is permissive for tyrosine phosphorylation.

BackgroundInsulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins are key moderators of insulin action. Their specific regulation determines downstream protein-protein interactions and confers specificity on growth factor signalling. Regulatory mechanisms that have been identified include phosphorylation of IRS proteins on tyrosine and serine residues and ubiquitination of lysine residues. This study investigated other potential molecular mechanisms of IRS-1 regulation.ResultsUsing the sos recruitment yeast two-hybrid system we found that IRS-1 and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) interact in the cytoplasmic compartment of yeast cells. The interaction mapped to the C-terminus of IRS-1 and was confirmed through co-immunoprecipitation in vitro of recombinant IRS-1 and HDAC2. HDAC2 bound to IRS-1 in mammalian cells treated with phorbol ester or after prolonged treatment with insulin/IGF-1 and also in the livers of ob/ob mice but not PTP1B knockout mice. Thus, the association occurs under conditions of compromised insulin signalling. We found that IRS-1 is an acetylated protein, of which the acetylation is increased by treatment of cells with Trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of HDAC activity. TSA-induced increases in acetylation of IRS-1 were concomitant with increases in tyrosine phosphorylation in response to insulin. These effects were confirmed using RNA interference against HDAC2, indicating that HDAC2 specifically prevents phosphorylation of IRS-1 by the insulin receptor.ConclusionsOur results show that IRS-1 is an acetylated protein, a post-translational modification that has not been previously described. Acetylation of IRS-1 is permissive for tyrosine phosphorylation and facilitates insulin-stimulated signal transduction. Specific inhibition of HDAC2 may increase insulin sensitivity in otherwise insulin resistant conditions.