U1 snRNPs Research Articles

Integrator and U1 snRNPs steer Pol II in the right direction.

Integrator and U1 snRNPs steer Pol II in the right direction.

USP39 promotes hepatocellular carcinogenesis through regulating alternative splicing in cooperation with SRSF6/HNRNPC

Abnormal alternative splicing (AS) caused by alterations in spliceosomal factors is implicated in cancers. Standard models posit that splice site selection is mainly determined by early spliceosomal U1 and U2 snRNPs. Whether and how other mid/late-acting spliceosome components such as USP39 modulate tumorigenic splice site choice remains largely elusive. We observed that hepatocyte-specific overexpression of USP39 promoted hepatocarcinogenesis and potently regulated splice site selection in transgenic mice. In human liver cancer cells, USP39 promoted tumor proliferation in a spliceosome-dependent manner. USP39 depletion deregulated hundreds of AS events, including the oncogenic splice-switching of KANK2. Mechanistically, we developed a novel RBP-motif enrichment analysis and found that USP39 modulated exon inclusion/exclusion by interacting with SRSF6/HNRNPC in both humans and mice. Our data represented a paradigm for the control of splice site selection by mid/late-acting spliceosome proteins and their interacting RBPs. USP39 and possibly other mid/late-acting spliceosome proteins may represent potential prognostic biomarkers and targets for cancer therapy.

Structural insights into recognition of SL4, the UUCG stem-loop, of human U1 snRNA by the ubiquitin-like domain, including the C-terminal tail in the SF3A1 subunit of U2 snRNP.

The pre-spliceosomal complex involves interactions between U1 and U2 snRNPs, where a ubiquitin-like domain (ULD) of SF3A1, a component of U2 snRNP, binds to the stem-loop 4 (SL4; the UUCG tetraloop) of U1 snRNA in U1 snRNP. Here, we reported the 1.80 Å crystal structure of human SF3A1 ULD (ULDSF3A1) complexed with SL4. The structural part of ULDSF3A1 (res. 704-785) adopts a typical β-grasp fold with a topology of β1-β2-α1-310a-β3-β4-310b-β5, closely resembling that of ubiquitin, except for the length and structure of the β1/β2 loop. A patch on the surface formed by three ULDSF3A1-specific residues, Lys756 (β3), Phe763 (β4), and Lys765 (following β4), contacts the canonical UUCG tetraloop structure. In contrast, the directly following C-terminal tail composed of 786KERGGRKK793 was essentially stretched. The main or side chains of all the residues interacted with the major groove of the stem helix; the RGG residues adopted a peculiar conformation for RNA recognition. These findings were confirmed by mutational studies using bio-layer interferometry. Collectively, a unique combination of the β-grasp fold and the C-terminal tail constituting ULDSF3A1 is required for the SL4-specific binding. This interaction mode also suggests that putative post-translational modifications, including ubiquitination in ULDSF3A1, directly inhibit SL4 binding.

Distinct biogenesis pathways may have led to functional divergence of the human and Drosophila Arglu1 sisRNA.

Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs) are stable, long noncoding RNAs containing intronic sequences. While sisRNAs have been found across diverse species, their level of conservation remains poorly understood. Here we report that the biogenesis and functions of a sisRNA transcribed from the highly conserved Arglu1 locus are distinct in human and Drosophila melanogaster. The Arglu1 genes in both species show similar exon-intron structures where the intron 2 is orthologous and positionally conserved. In humans, Arglu1 sisRNA retains the entire intron 2 and promotes host gene splicing. Mechanistically, Arglu1 sisRNA represses the splicing-inhibitory activity of ARGLU1 protein by binding to ARGLU1 protein and promoting its localization to nuclear speckles, away from the Arglu1 gene locus. In contrast, Drosophila dArglu1 sisRNA forms via premature cleavage of intron 2 and represses host gene splicing. This repression occurs through a local accumulation of dARGLU1 protein and inhibition of telescripting by U1 snRNPs at the dArglu1 locus. We propose that distinct biogenesis of positionally conserved Arglu1 sisRNAs in both species may have led to functional divergence.

Yeast U6 snRNA made by RNA polymerase II is less stable but functional.

U6 small nuclear (sn)RNA is the shortest and most conserved snRNA in the spliceosome and forms a substantial portion of its active site. Unlike the other four spliceosomal snRNAs, which are synthesized by RNA polymerase (RNAP) II, U6 is made by RNAP III. To determine if some aspect of U6 function is incompatible with synthesis by RNAP II, we created a U6 snRNA gene with RNAP II promoter and terminator sequences. This "U6-II" gene is functional as the sole source of U6 snRNA in yeast, but its transcript is much less stable than U6 snRNA made by RNAP III. Addition of the U4 snRNA Sm protein binding site to U6-II increased its stability and led to formation of U6-II•Sm complexes. We conclude that synthesis of U6 snRNA by RNAP III is not required for its function and that U6 snRNPs containing the Sm complex can form in vivo. The ability to synthesize U6 snRNA with RNAP II relaxes sequence restraints imposed by intragenic RNAP III promoter and terminator elements and allows facile control of U6 levels via regulators of RNAP II transcription.

The skeletal muscle circadian clock regulates titin splicing through RBM20.

Circadian rhythms are maintained by a cell-autonomous, transcriptional-translational feedback loop known as the molecular clock. While previous research suggests a role of the molecular clock in regulating skeletal muscle structure and function, no mechanisms have connected the molecular clock to sarcomere filaments. Utilizing inducible, skeletal muscle specific, Bmal1 knockout (iMSBmal1-/-) mice, we showed that knocking out skeletal muscle clock function alters titin isoform expression using RNAseq, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and sodium dodecyl sulfate-vertical agarose gel electrophoresis. This alteration in titin's spring length resulted in sarcomere length heterogeneity. We demonstrate the direct link between altered titin splicing and sarcomere length in vitro using U7 snRNPs that truncate the region of titin altered in iMSBmal1-/- muscle. We identified a mechanism whereby the skeletal muscle clock regulates titin isoform expression through transcriptional regulation of Rbm20, a potent splicing regulator of titin. Lastly, we used an environmental model of circadian rhythm disruption and identified significant downregulation of Rbm20 expression. Our findings demonstrate the importance of the skeletal muscle circadian clock in maintaining titin isoform through regulation of RBM20 expression. Because circadian rhythm disruption is a feature of many chronic diseases, our results highlight a novel pathway that could be targeted to maintain skeletal muscle structure and function in a range of pathologies.

CHERP Regulates the Alternative Splicing of pre-mRNAs in the Nucleus.

Calcium homeostasis endoplasmic reticulum protein (CHERP) is colocalized with the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) in the endoplasmic reticulum or perinuclear region, and has been involved in intracellular calcium signaling. Structurally, CHERP carries the nuclear localization signal and arginine/serine-dipeptide repeats, like domain, and interacts with the spliceosome. However, the exact function of CHERP in the nucleus remains unknown. Here, we showed that poly(A)+ RNAs accumulated in the nucleus of CHERP-depleted U2OS cells. Our global analysis revealed that CHERP regulated alternative mRNA splicing events by interaction with U2 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (U2 snRNPs) and U2 snRNP-related proteins. Among the five alternative splicing patterns analyzed, intron retention was the most frequently observed event. This was in accordance with the accumulation of poly(A)+ RNAs in the nucleus. Furthermore, intron retention and cassette exon choices were influenced by the strength of the 5′ or 3′ splice site, the branch point site, GC content, and intron length. In addition, CHERP depletion induced anomalies in the cell cycle progression into the M phase, and abnormal cell division. These results suggested that CHERP is involved in the regulation of alternative splicing.

Exon‐independent recruitment of SRSF1 is mediated by U1 snRNP stem‐loop 3

SRSF1 protein and U1 snRNPs are closely connected splicing factors. They both stimulate exon inclusion, SRSF1 by binding to exonic splicing enhancer sequences (ESEs) and U1 snRNPs by binding to the downstream 5′ splice site (SS), and both factors affect 5′ SS selection. The binding of U1 snRNPs initiates spliceosome assembly, but SR proteins such as SRSF1 can in some cases substitute for it. The mechanistic basis of this relationship is poorly understood. We show here by single‐molecule methods that a single molecule of SRSF1 can be recruited by a U1 snRNP. This reaction is independent of exon sequences and separate from the U1‐independent process of binding to an ESE. Structural analysis and cross‐linking data show that SRSF1 contacts U1 snRNA stem‐loop 3, which is required for splicing. We suggest that the recruitment of SRSF1 to a U1 snRNP at a 5′SS is the basis for exon definition by U1 snRNP and might be one of the principal functions of U1 snRNPs in the core reactions of splicing in mammals.

Structural insights into how Prp5 proofreads the pre-mRNA branch site

During the splicing of introns from precursor messenger RNAs (pre-mRNAs), the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) must undergo stable integration into the spliceosomal A complex—a poorly understood, multistep process that is facilitated by the DEAD-box helicase Prp5 (refs. 1–4). During this process, the U2 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) forms an RNA duplex with the pre-mRNA branch site (the U2–BS helix), which is proofread by Prp5 at this stage through an unclear mechanism5. Here, by deleting the branch-site adenosine (BS-A) or mutating the branch-site sequence of an actin pre-mRNA, we stall the assembly of spliceosomes in extracts from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae directly before the A complex is formed. We then determine the three-dimensional structure of this newly identified assembly intermediate by cryo-electron microscopy. Our structure indicates that the U2–BS helix has formed in this pre-A complex, but is not yet clamped by the HEAT domain of the Hsh155 protein (Hsh155HEAT), which exhibits an open conformation. The structure further reveals a large-scale remodelling/repositioning of the U1 and U2 snRNPs during the formation of the A complex that is required to allow subsequent binding of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP, but that this repositioning is blocked in the pre-A complex by the presence of Prp5. Our data suggest that binding of Hsh155HEAT to the bulged BS-A of the U2–BS helix triggers closure of Hsh155HEAT, which in turn destabilizes Prp5 binding. Thus, Prp5 proofreads the branch site indirectly, hindering spliceosome assembly if branch-site mutations prevent the remodelling of Hsh155HEAT. Our data provide structural insights into how a spliceosomal helicase enhances the fidelity of pre-mRNA splicing.

Human spliceosomal snRNA sequence variants generate variant spliceosomes.

Human pre-mRNA splicing is primarily catalyzed by the major spliceosome, comprising five small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complexes, U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs, each of which contains the corresponding U-rich snRNA. These snRNAs are encoded by large gene families exhibiting significant sequence variation, but it remains unknown if most human snRNA genes are untranscribed pseudogenes or produce variant snRNAs with the potential to differentially influence splicing. Since gene duplication and variation are powerful mechanisms of evolutionary adaptation, we sought to address this knowledge gap by systematically profiling human U1, U2, U4, and U5 snRNA variant gene transcripts. We identified 55 transcripts that are detectably expressed in human cells, 38 of which incorporate into snRNPs and spliceosomes in 293T cells. All U1 snRNA variants are more than 1000-fold less abundant in spliceosomes than the canonical U1, whereas at least 1% of spliceosomes contain a variant of U2 or U4. In contrast, eight U5 snRNA sequence variants occupy spliceosomes at levels of 1% to 46%. Furthermore, snRNA variants display distinct expression patterns across five human cell lines and adult and fetal tissues. Different RNA degradation rates contribute to the diverse steady state levels of snRNA variants. Our findings suggest that variant spliceosomes containing noncanonical snRNAs may contribute to different tissue- and cell-type–specific alternative splicing patterns.

TSSC4 is a component of U5 snRNP that promotes tri-snRNP formation

U5 snRNP is a complex particle essential for RNA splicing. U5 snRNPs undergo intricate biogenesis that ensures that only a fully mature particle assembles into a splicing competent U4/U6•U5 tri-snRNP and enters the splicing reaction. During splicing, U5 snRNP is substantially rearranged and leaves as a U5/PRPF19 post-splicing particle, which requires re-generation before the next round of splicing. Here, we show that a previously uncharacterized protein TSSC4 is a component of U5 snRNP that promotes tri-snRNP formation. We provide evidence that TSSC4 associates with U5 snRNP chaperones, U5 snRNP and the U5/PRPF19 particle. Specifically, TSSC4 interacts with U5-specific proteins PRPF8, EFTUD2 and SNRNP200. We also identified TSSC4 domains critical for the interaction with U5 snRNP and the PRPF19 complex, as well as for TSSC4 function in tri-snRNP assembly. TSSC4 emerges as a specific chaperone that acts in U5 snRNP de novo biogenesis as well as post-splicing recycling.

Synergistic roles for human U1 snRNA stem-loops in pre-mRNA splicing

ABSTRACT During spliceosome assembly, interactions that bring the 5′ and 3′ ends of an intron in proximity are critical for the production of mature mRNA. Here, we report synergistic roles for the stem-loops 3 (SL3) and 4 (SL4) of the human U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) in maintaining the optimal U1 snRNP function, and formation of cross-intron contact with the U2 snRNP. We find that SL3 and SL4 bind distinct spliceosomal proteins and combining a U1 snRNA activity assay with siRNA-mediated knockdown, we demonstrate that SL3 and SL4 act through the RNA helicase UAP56 and the U2 protein SF3A1, respectively. In vitro analysis using UV crosslinking and splicing assays indicated that SL3 likely promotes the SL4-SF3A1 interaction leading to enhancement of A complex formation and pre-mRNA splicing. Overall, these results highlight the vital role of the distinct contacts of SL3 and SL4 in bridging the pre-mRNA bound U1 and U2 snRNPs during the early steps of human spliceosome assembly.

Minor Intron Splicing from Basic Science to Disease.

Pre-mRNA splicing is an essential step in gene expression and is catalyzed by two machineries in eukaryotes: the major (U2 type) and minor (U12 type) spliceosomes. While the majority of introns in humans are U2 type, less than 0.4% are U12 type, also known as minor introns (mi-INTs), and require a specialized spliceosome composed of U11, U12, U4atac, U5, and U6atac snRNPs. The high evolutionary conservation and apparent splicing inefficiency of U12 introns have set them apart from their major counterparts and led to speculations on the purpose for their existence. However, recent studies challenged the simple concept of mi-INTs splicing inefficiency due to low abundance of their spliceosome and confirmed their regulatory role in alternative splicing, significantly impacting the expression of their host genes. Additionally, a growing list of minor spliceosome-associated diseases with tissue-specific pathologies affirmed the importance of minor splicing as a key regulatory pathway, which when deregulated could lead to tissue-specific pathologies due to specific alterations in the expression of some minor-intron-containing genes. Consequently, uncovering how mi-INTs splicing is regulated in a tissue-specific manner would allow for better understanding of disease pathogenesis and pave the way for novel therapies, which we highlight in this review.

A single m6A modification in U6 snRNA diversifies exon sequence at the 5\u2019 splice site

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a modification that plays pivotal roles in RNA metabolism and function, although its functions in spliceosomal U6 snRNA remain unknown. To elucidate its role, we conduct a large-scale transcriptome analysis of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain lacking this modification and found a global change of pre-mRNA splicing. The most significantly impacted introns are enriched for adenosine at the fourth position pairing the m6A in U6 snRNA, and exon sequences weakly recognized by U5 snRNA. This suggests cooperative recognition of 5’ splice site by U6 and U5 snRNPs, and also a role of m6A facilitating efficient recognition of the splice sites weakly interacting with U5 snRNA, indicating that U6 snRNA m6A relaxes the 5’ exon constraint and allows protein sequence diversity along with explosively increasing number of introns over the course of eukaryotic evolution.

The Role of the U5 snRNP in Genetic Disorders and Cancer.

Pre-mRNA splicing is performed by the spliceosome, a dynamic macromolecular complex consisting of five small uridine-rich ribonucleoprotein complexes (the U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6 snRNPs) and numerous auxiliary splicing factors. A plethora of human disorders are caused by genetic variants affecting the function and/or expression of splicing factors, including the core snRNP proteins. Variants in the genes encoding proteins of the U5 snRNP cause two distinct and tissue-specific human disease phenotypes – variants in PRPF6, PRPF8, and SNRP200 are associated with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), while variants in EFTUD2 and TXNL4A cause the craniofacial disorders mandibulofacial dysostosis Guion-Almeida type (MFDGA) and Burn-McKeown syndrome (BMKS), respectively. Furthermore, recurrent somatic mutations or changes in the expression levels of a number of U5 snRNP proteins (PRPF6, PRPF8, EFTUD2, DDX23, and SNRNP40) have been associated with human cancers. How and why variants in ubiquitously expressed spliceosome proteins required for pre-mRNA splicing in all human cells result in tissue-restricted disease phenotypes is not clear. Additionally, why variants in different, yet interacting, proteins making up the same core spliceosome snRNP result in completely distinct disease outcomes – RP, craniofacial defects or cancer – is unclear. In this review, we define the roles of different U5 snRNP proteins in RP, craniofacial disorders and cancer, including how disease-associated genetic variants affect pre-mRNA splicing and the proposed disease mechanisms. We then propose potential hypotheses for how U5 snRNP variants cause tissue specificity resulting in the restricted and distinct human disorders.

Ecd promotes U5 snRNP maturation and Prp8 stability.

Pre-mRNA splicing catalyzed by the spliceosome represents a critical step in the regulation of gene expression contributing to transcriptome and proteome diversity. The spliceosome consists of five small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), the biogenesis of which remains only partially understood. Here we define the evolutionarily conserved protein Ecdysoneless (Ecd) as a critical regulator of U5 snRNP assembly and Prp8 stability. Combining Drosophila genetics with proteomic approaches, we demonstrate the Ecd requirement for the maintenance of adult healthspan and lifespan and identify the Sm ring protein SmD3 as a novel interaction partner of Ecd. We show that the predominant task of Ecd is to deliver Prp8 to the emerging U5 snRNPs in the cytoplasm. Ecd deficiency, on the other hand, leads to reduced Prp8 protein levels and compromised U5 snRNP biogenesis, causing loss of splicing fidelity and transcriptome integrity. Based on our findings, we propose that Ecd chaperones Prp8 to the forming U5 snRNP allowing completion of the cytoplasmic part of the U5 snRNP biogenesis pathway necessary to meet the cellular demand for functional spliceosomes.

A sart1 Zebrafish Mutant Results in Developmental Defects in the Central Nervous System.

The spliceosome consists of accessory proteins and small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) that remove introns from RNA. As splicing defects are associated with degenerative conditions, a better understanding of spliceosome formation and function is essential. We provide insight into the role of a spliceosome protein U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP-associated protein 1, or Squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by T-cells (Sart1). Sart1 recruits the U4.U6/U5 tri-snRNP complex to nuclear RNA. The complex then associates with U1 and U2 snRNPs to form the spliceosome. A forward genetic screen identifying defects in choroid plexus development and whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified a point mutation in exon 12 of sart1 in Danio rerio (zebrafish). This mutation caused an up-regulation of sart1. Using RNA-Seq analysis, we identified additional upregulated genes, including those involved in apoptosis. We also observed increased activated caspase 3 in the brain and eye and down-regulation of vision-related genes. Although splicing occurs in numerous cells types, sart1 expression in zebrafish was restricted to the brain. By identifying sart1 expression in the brain and cell death within the central nervous system (CNS), we provide additional insights into the role of sart1 in specific tissues. We also characterized sart1’s involvement in cell death and vision-related pathways.

Profiling of cis- and trans-acting factors supporting noncanonical splice site activation

ABSTRACT Recently, by combining transcriptomics with functional splicing reporter assays we were able to identify GT > GC > TT as the three highest ranked dinucleotides of human 5ʹ splice sites (5’ss). Here, we have extended our investigations to the proteomic characterization of nuclear proteins that bind to canonical and noncanonical 5’ss. Surprisingly, we found that U1 snRNP binding to functional 5’ss sequences prevented components of the DNA damage response (DDR) from binding to the RNA, suggesting a close link between spliceosome arrangement and genome stability. We demonstrate that all tested noncanonical 5’ss sequences are bona-fide targets of the U2-type spliceosome and are bound by U1 snRNP, including U1-C, in the presence of splicing enhancers. The quantity of precipitated U1-C protein was similar for all noncanonical 5’ss dinucleotides, so that the highly different 5’ss usage was likely due to a later step after early U1 snRNP binding. In addition, we show that an internal GT at positions +5/+6 can be advantageous for splicing at position +1 of noncanonical splice sites. Likewise, and in agreement with previous observations, splicing inactive U1 snRNP binding sites could serve as splicing enhancers, which may also explain the higher abundance of U1 snRNPs compared to other U snRNPs. Finally, we observe that an arginine-serine (RS)-rich domain recruitment to stem loop I of the U1 snRNA is functionally sufficient to promote exon-definition and upstream 3’ss activation.

MTOR up-regulation of SNRPA1 contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma development.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Recent studies showed that snRNPs were implicated in human cancer development. The role of SNRPA1, which is a member of U2 snRNPs, in HCC, remains undocumented. Here, we found that SNRPA1 was highly expressed in HCC tissue compared with normal adjacent liver tissues. Up-regulation of SNRPA1 was correlated with the clinical stage of HCC and the overall survival of HCC patients. In vitro and in vivo results showed that knockdown of SNPRA1 inhibited the cell proliferation, colony formation and xenografted tumorigenesis of HCC cells. Apoptosis was induced by SNPRA1 down-regulation. Mechanistically, SNPRA1 was stimulated by mTOR activation. In addition, whole-genome microarray analysis identified that 262 genes were up-regulated and 462 genes were down-regulated by SNPRA1 knockdown in HCC cells. qPCR analysis suggested that the fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), β-catenin, Ki-67 and cyclin B1 were down-regulated and caspase 3, p53 as well as p21 were up-regulated after SNRPA1 knockdown. Taken together, our findings implicate that SNPRA1 functions as an oncogene in HCC.

SRSF3 and hnRNP K Antagonistically Regulate Splicing of Large Exons

Mammalian internal exons are usually between 50 and 200 bp long. Their average length is ~150 bp, and only 5% of them are larger than 300 bp. Although previous studies showed that splice site recognition becomes less efficient with increasing exon size, the mechanism how large exons are correctly spliced is not well understood. To investigate the role of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) in the splicing of large exons, we analyzed 842 publicly available RNA‐seq datasets from GEO, in which 48 canonical splicing factors were individually knocked down. MISO analysis was performed to detect exons that were specifically included or excluded by knockdown of an RBP, and average lengths of these exons were calculated. Our analysis revealed that SRSF3 is the top RBP that promotes inclusion of the largest exon set (390 exons per analysis, 337 bp on average).Interestingly, most of the SRSF3‐dependent large exons are annotated as constitutive exons in the public database. Consistently, these exons have high splice site strengths. Motif analysis revealed that the SRSF3‐dependent large exons are greatly enriched with C‐rich sequences, which are preferentially recognized by SRSF3. In addition, our analysis also detected the enrichment of C‐stretches, which are potential binding sites for hnRNP K. ENCODE eCLIP shows that HNRNPK extensively binds to the SRSF3‐dependent large exons. To examine whether hnRNP K is involved in the regulation of SRSF3‐dependent splicing of large exons, we knocked down Hnrnpk along with Srsf3‐knockdown using C2C12 myoblasts. RNA‐seq analysis revealed that Srsf3‐silencing alone induced skipping of 374 exons, of which average length is 395 bp. Co‐silencing of Srsf3 and Hnrnpk rescued skipping of 142 exons by Srsf3‐silencing, of which average length is still long, 458 bp. These results indicate that substantial number of large exons require SRSF3 to prevent their skipping by hnRNP K.To investigate the molecules associated with SRSF3 and hnRNP K in the splicing of large exons, we next conducted proteomic approach that defines the native protein complexes in the chromatin fraction. Cells expressing FLAG tagged SRSF3 or hnRNP K were lysed under the physiological salt concentration, and isolated chromatin fractions were immunoprecipitated with At‐FLAG antibody. Mass spectrometry analysis of the immunoprecipitants revealed that SRSF3 is mainly associated with U1 snRNPs, U2AFs, and SF1, and to a lesser extent with hnRNPs, while hnRNP K is preferentially associated with hnRNPs and U1 snRNPs, but not with U2AF or SF1. Thus, SRSF3 and hnRNP K are involved in early but distinct stages of spliceosome assembly. Together, our analysis identified the antagonistic splicing regulation of SRSF3 and HNRNPK on C‐rich large exons.