Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Group Research Articles

7626 Endocrine Adverse Reactions Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors In Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis Using The US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Abstract Disclosure: W. Shao: None. D. Lu: None. K. Yang: None. Y. Gao: None. J. Zhang: None. Y. Zhang: None. Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) have been recognized to cause multiple endocrine adverse reactions (EARs). However, the combination therapy-associated EARs is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of EARs induced by TKI, ICI and TKI+ICI therapy. Methods: Using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, 938464 cases of all adverse events, adult patients, related to the three types of treatments from January 2001 to September 2023 were identified. A total of 22275 cases were EARs and divided into TKI (n=9181), ICI (n=11363) and TKI+ICI group (n=1731). Results: The incidence of EARs was the highest in TKI+ICI group (9.1%), followed by ICI (7.7%), and TKI group (1.2%) (P < 0.05). Among patients with EARs, the proportions of female and Asian patients were significantly greater in TKI+ICI group than in the other groups (P<0.05 for all). TKI+ICI group had a larger proportion of elderly patients compared with TKI group. The most common type of EARs in TKI+ICI group was thyroid dysfunction (TD) (67.5%), followed by glucose metabolism disorder (GMD) (14.0%). Compared with TKI group, TKI+ICI group displayed a higher risk of TD (OR 3.247, 95% CI [2.849-3.701]), pituitary dysfunction (PD) (OR 6.199, 95% CI [4.534-8.474]), and primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) (OR 4.178, 95% CI [3.470-5.031]), while the risk of GMD was lower (OR 0.136, 95% CI [0.115-0.161]). Compared with ICI group, an increasing trend of TD (OR 2.640, 95% CI [2.328-2.995]) was found in TKI+ICI group, while a lower risk of GMD (OR 0.388, 95% CI [0.328-0.459]) and PD (OR 0.312, 95% CI [0.255-0.383]) was observed in TKI+ICI group. Hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus were the main types of TD and GMD in all three groups. Patients with polyendocrine glands involvement accounted for the largest proportion in ICI group (11.4%), followed by TKI +ICI (7.9%), and TKI group (2.3%) (P<0.05). In TKI+ICI group, elderly patients, Asians, melanoma patients were more likely to experience multi-glandular EARs. In terms of prognosis, TKI+ICI group presented a higher risk of hospitalization compared to TKI (OR 2.201, 95% CI [1.943-2.492]) and ICI group (OR 1.282, 95%CI [1.139-1.442]). However, the mortality risk of TKI+ICI group was significantly lower (OR 0.717, 95% CI [0.588-0.874]) than TKI group, and there was no significant difference compared to ICI group. Moreover, there was no difference in mortality between patients with polyendocrine and single endocrine gland involvement. Conclusions: EARs were more common in TKI+ICI therapy. The distribution of EARs in different glands varied among combination therapy and monotherapy. Combination therapy associated EARs did not increase the risk of mortality. Key words: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Combination therapy, Endocrine adverse reactions, Prognosis Presentation: 6/3/2024

Real-World Survival Outcomes of First-Line Therapies in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Centres in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents a challenging condition characterised by poor prognosis and limited response to chemoradiotherapy. In this retrospective study, we compared the survival outcomes of first-line ICI regimens versus single-agent TKIs in patients with mRCC from two centres in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This study included 84 patients diagnosed with clear cell mRCC between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on treatment regimens. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The median first-line PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.3-14.1) for the overall cohort, with no significant difference between the single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) group (9.4 months; 95% CI: 6.4-12.4), combination ICI group (9.0 months; 95% CI: 0.0-24.9), and single-agent ICI group (21.2 months; 95% CI: 2.6-39.8; p = 0.591). The median OS for the overall cohort was 42.0 months (95% CI: 14.9-69.2), with the single-agent TKI group having a median OS of 33.3 months (95% CI: 0.0-71.7), the combination ICI group, 42.0 months (95% CI: 0.06-84.0), and the single-agent ICI group, 23.0 months (95% CI: 19.2-26.7; p = 0.73). In comparison, the ICI-based combination therapy group exhibited a higher ORR of 41.0% (95% CI: 26.3-57.8%), while the single-agent ICI group had an ORR of 20.0% (95% CI: 3.5-55.8%). Cox regression identified liver metastasis as a significant independent predictor of PFS (HR = 1.8, p = 0.043), while a lower Karnofsky Performance Status was a significant independent predictor of OS (HR = 3.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In real-world practice from Saudi Arabia, first-line, single-agent ICI therapy offers promising anti-tumour activity and non-inferior survival outcomes compared to standard ICI-based combinations and single-agent TKIs.

Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.

In metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), recent studies have shown promising efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy. However, there are insufficient evidences about clinical efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy in metastatic non-ccRCC (nccRCC). We retrospectively investigated 44 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (ICI + ICI group) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (ICI + TKI group), and assessed clinical efficacy in both groups. Of all patients, overall response rate and disease control rate for ICI combination treatments were 36.3% and 75%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 and 23.9months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of liver metastasis significantly affected worse PFS and OS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.049). Importantly, PFS and OS seemed similar in ICI + ICI group and ICI + TKI group (p = 0.778 and p = 0.559). Although the discontinuation rate of the combination therapy due to adverse effects in patients aged ≥ 75years was significantly higher compared to that in patients aged < 75years (45% versus 12%, p = 0.017), there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between two groups (p = 0.290 and p = 0.257, respectively). This study confirms clinical benefit of ICI combination therapy for metastatic nccRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, the effectiveness of combination therapy was comparable between patients aged < 75 and those ≥75years with respect to clinical prognosis.

Survival prognostic factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with simultaneous brain metastases and poor performance status at initial presentation

PurposeAlthough the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly progressed recently, there is little evidence of treatment for patients with symptomatic brain metastases (BM) and poor performance status (PS). However, in symptomatic BM patients, appropriate upfront intracranial treatment can often lead to rapid improvement in PS and effective systemic therapy. Thus, this study investigated the prognostic factors for the survival of poor PS NSCLC patients with synchronous BM. MethodsData of patients with BM and Karnofsky PS (KPS) ≤70 at the first diagnosis of NSCLC who were treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. Patient survival was compared among patients stratified by type of first-line regimen of systemic treatment. Correlations between patient characteristics and survival were examined. ResultsFifty patients receiving aggressive treatment were enrolled. The median survival times for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and chemotherapy alone groups were 19 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.8–68.5), 19 (3.0–62.0), and 13 (1.2–24.8) months, respectively. Survival in the TKI and ICI groups was significantly longer than in the chemotherapy alone group (p = 0.046, TKI vs. chemo; p = 0.022, ICI vs. chemo; p = 0.023). Both sex and type of systemic treatment correlated to survival time on univariate analysis. Chemotherapy alone for systemic treatment [p = 0.034; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 (0.20–0.94)] remained significant for predicting overall survival in the multivariate analysis. ConclusionEven in patients with poor PS and BM at the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, the ICI group had a survival time comparable to that of the TKI group when combined with tailor-made intracranial treatment. There is a subgroup in the patient population that was previously considered unsuitable for ICI, whose PS improves with individualized intracranial treatment, and who may benefit from immunotherapy.

An observational study on the relationship between tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment-free remission and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

171 Background: Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the effectiveness of treating chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia has seen remarkable improvement. A current challenge in TKI therapy is achieving treatment-free remission (TFR) safely. Numerous TKI-stop trials and translational studies have investigated factors influencing TFR, including TKI treatment duration, duration of deep molecular response (DMR), cellular immunity activation, and bcr::abl1 transcript type. However, identifying reliable markers for achieving TFR safely remains uncertain. In this multicenter study, we focused on examining the association between TFR and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs). Methods: Between June 2020 and March 2022, a total of 45 patients were enrolled: 38 patients with DMR for at least 1 year on TKIs (on TKI group) and 7 patients with DMR for at least 1 year after discontinuing TKIs (off TKI group). The study included 30 males, with a median age of 59 years (range: 29–87). Median TKI treatment duration was 7.7 years (range: 1.5–18.3), and median TKI cessation duration in the off TKI group was 4.9 years (range: 1.7–7.1). Molecular response and cellular immunity were monitored over 12 months post-consent for patients in the off TKI group and after TKI discontinuation for patients in the on TKI group. Results: During the observation period, 25 patients (65.8%) in the on TKI group maintained DMR, while 13 patients (34.2%) lost DMR. Conversely, all patients in the off TKI group sustained DMR. The median TKI treatment duration in the group maintaining DMR (9.45 years, range: 3.3–18.3, N = 32) significantly exceeded that in the group losing DMR (4.9 years, range: 1.5–11.9, N = 13) (P = 0.0048). Patients taking TKIs for over 7 years with a higher percentage of total memory CTLs than total effector CTLs maintained DMR. Conversely, patients losing DMR despite over 10 years of TKI treatment had a higher percentage of total effector CTLs than total memory CTLs. Among the 32 patients maintaining DMR, 19 exhibited a higher percentage of total effector CTLs than total memory CTLs, with 15 (78.9%) maintaining MR5 throughout the study. Furthermore, of the six patients maintaining DMR with relatively short TKI administration (median 5.5 years, range: 3.3–6.4), three displayed a higher percentage of total memory CTLs than total effector CTLs. Among the remaining three patients, two showed strong CTL activation, with one patient having an effector CTL clone over 30% and the other having a memory CTL clone over 30%. Conclusions: This study indicates that a sufficiently prolonged TKI treatment duration (&gt;7 years) and maintaining deeper DMR (≥ MR4.5, preferably MR5) are conducive to safely achieving TFR. Furthermore, a high percentage of total memory CTLs and intense CTL activation may serve as meaningful markers for TFR.

Metabolomics reveals ascorbic acid inhibits ferroptosis in hepatocytes and boosts the effectiveness of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundImmunotherapy combined with molecular targeted therapy is increasingly popular in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, immune-related adverse events(irAEs) brought on by immunotherapy increase the likelihood of side effects, thus it is important to look into ways to address this issue.MethodsDifferent metabolite patterns were established by analyzing metabolomics data in liver tissue samples from 10 patients(divided into severe and mild liver injury) before and after immuno-targeted therapy. After establishing a subcutaneous tumor model of HCC, the mice were divided into PBS group, ascorbic acid(AA) group, and anti-PD1 + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) group, anti-PD1 + TKI + AA group. Liver tissue were stained with hematoxylin-eosin staining(HE) and the content of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase(ALT) in blood were determined. The mechanism was confirmed by western blotting, mass cytometry, and other techniques.ResultsThrough metabolomics analysis, AA was significantly reduced in the sample of patients with severe liver injury caused by immuno-targeted therapy compared to patients with mild liver injury. The addition of AA in vivo experiments demonstrated a reduction in liver injury in mice. In the liver tissues of the anti-PD1 + TKI + AA group, the protein expressions of SLC7A11,GPX4 and the level of glutathione(GSH) were found to be higher compared to the anti-PD1 + TKI group. Mass cytometry analysis revealed a significant increase in the CD11b+CD44+ PD-L1+ cell population in the AA group when compared to the PBS group.ConclusionsAA could reduce liver injury by preventing hepatocyte SLC7A11/GPX4 ferroptosis and improve the immunotherapy effect of anti-PD1 by boosting CD11b+CD44+PD-L1+cell population in HCC.

Asciminib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

BackgroundPatients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) need long-term therapy with high efficacy and safety. Asciminib, a BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket, may offer better efficacy and safety and fewer side effects than currently available frontline ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).MethodsIn a phase 3 trial, patients with newly diagnosed CML were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either asciminib (80 mg once daily) or an investigator-selected TKI, with randomization stratified by European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival score category (low, intermediate, or high risk) and by TKI selected by investigators before randomization (including imatinib and second-generation TKIs). The primary end points were major molecular response (defined as BCR::ABL1 transcript levels ≤0.1% on the International Scale [IS]) at week 48, for comparisons between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs and between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs in the prerandomization-selected imatinib stratum.ResultsA total of 201 patients were assigned to receive asciminib and 204 to receive investigator-selected TKIs. The median follow-up was 16.3 months in the asciminib group and 15.7 months in the investigator-selected TKI group. A major molecular response at week 48 occurred in 67.7% of patients in the asciminib group, as compared with 49.0% in the investigator-selected TKI group (difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6 to 28.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001]), and in 69.3% of patients in the asciminib group as compared with 40.2% in the imatinib group within the imatinib stratum (difference, 29.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.9 to 42.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a major molecular response at week 48 was 66.0% with asciminib and 57.8% with TKIs in the second-generation TKI stratum (difference, 8.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −5.1 to 21.5). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher and events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen were less frequent with asciminib (38.0% and 4.5%, respectively) than with imatinib (44.4% and 11.1%) and second-generation TKIs (54.9% and 9.8%).ConclusionsIn this trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs and imatinib, asciminib showed superior efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. Direct comparison between asciminib and second-generation TKIs was not a primary objective. (Funded by Novartis; ASC4FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04971226).

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes for Patients Receiving First-line Immune-based Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors from the ARON-1 Study

Background and objectivePapillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the most frequent histological subtype of non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Owing to the heterogeneity of nccRCC, patients are often excluded from large phase 3 trials focused on clear cell RCC, so treatment options for nccRCC remain limited. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of first-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immuno-oncology (IO)-based combinations in patients with pRCC. MethodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of real-world data collected for patients with advanced pRCC treated in 40 centers in 12 countries as part of the ARON-1 project (NCT05287464). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the overall response rate (ORR), and time to second progression (PFS2). OS, PFS, and PFS2 were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and results were compared between the treatment groups using a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariable analyses were carried out using Cox proportional-hazard models. Key findings and limitationsWe included 200 patients with metastatic pRCC, of whom 73 were treated with IO-based combinations and 127 with TKIs. Median OS was 22.5 mo in the TKI group 28.8 mo in the IO group (p = 0.081). Median PFS was 6.4 mo in the TKI group and 17.4 mo in the IO group (p < 0.001). The ORR was higher in the IO group than in the TKI group (41% vs 27%; p = 0.037). Conclusions and clinical implicationsOur results show that IO-based combinations have superior efficacy outcomes to TKIs for first-line treatment of metastatic pRCC. Patient summaryThe ARON-1 project collects clinical data for patients with kidney cancer treated in multiple centers worldwide to assess outcomes in the real-world setting. We analyzed data for patients with metastatic kidney cancer of a specific subtype to evaluate the efficacy of different first-line treatments. Patients treated with immune-based combinations had better outcomes than patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts tumor response and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing immunotherapies

BackgroundLymphocyte-related factors were associated with survival outcome of different types of cancers. Nevertheless, the association between lymphocytes-related factors and tumor response of immunotherapy remains unclear. MethodsThis is a retrospective study. Eligible participants included patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent immunotherapy as their first-line treatment. Radiological assessment of tumor response adhered to RECIST 1.1 and HCC-specific modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were employed to analyze clinical factors associated with tumor response. Kaplan-Meier survivial analysis were employed to compare progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) across different clinical factors. Furthermore, patients who received treatment with either a combination of bevacizumab and anti-PD-1(L1) antibody (Beva group) or tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) and anti-PD-1 antibody (TKI group) were examined to explore the relation between clinical factors and tumor response. ResultsA total of 208 patients were enrolled in this study. The median PFS and OS were 9.84 months and 24.44 months,respectively. An independent factor associated with a more favorable tumor response to immunotherapy was identified when PLR<100. Patients with PLR<100 had longer PFS than other patients, while OS showed no significant difference. Further analysis revealed that PLR exhibited superior prognostic value in patients of the Beva group as compared to those in the TKI group. ConclusionsThere exisits an association between PLR and tumor response as well as survival outcomes in patients receiving immunotherapy, particularly those treated with the combination of bevacizumab and anti-PD-1.

Radioembolization plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Compared with Radioembolization plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeTo investigate if combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization results in superior outcomes than those yielded by tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and 90Y for the treatment of intermediate- to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsA retrospective review of patients presented at an institutional multidisciplinary liver tumor board between January 1, 2012 and August 1, 2023 was conducted. In total, 44 patients with HCC who underwent 90Y 4 weeks within initiation of ICI or TKI therapy were included. Propensity score matching was conducted to account for baseline demographic differences. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and univariate statistics identified disease response and control rate differences. Duration of imaging response was defined as number of months between the first scan after therapy and the first scan showing progression as defined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) or immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST). Adverse events were analyzed per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. ResultsPatients in the 90Y+ICI therapy group had better objective response rates (ORRs) (89.5% vs 36.8%; P < .001) and disease control rates (DCRs) (94.7% vs 63.2%; P < .001) by mRECIST and iRECIST (ORR: 78.9% vs 36.8%; P < .001; DCR: 94.7% vs 63.2%; P < .001). Median PFS (8.3 vs 4.1 months; P = .37) and OS (15.8 vs 14.3 months; P = .52) were not statistically different. Twelve patients (63.1%) in the 90Y+TKI group did not complete systemic therapy owing to adverse effects compared with 1 patient (5.3%) in the 90Y+ICI group (P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events were not statistically different (90Y+TKI: 21.1%; 90Y+ICI: 5.3%; P = .150). ConclusionsPatients with HCC who received 90Y+ICI had better imaging response and fewer regimen-altering adverse events than those who received 90Y+TKI. No significant combination therapy adverse events were attributable to radioembolization.

The safety and efficacy of TACE combined with HAIC, PD-1 inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

To assess the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC)、PD-1 inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKI) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A retrospective analysis was performed on 158 unresectable HCC patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between May 2019 and October 2022. The patients were split into two groups based on the type of treatment they received: TACE combined with HAIC,PD-1 and TKI group (THPK) and TACE combined with PD-1 and TKI group (TPK). The response was evaluated using modified solid tumor Efficacy Assessment Criteria (mRECIST). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze the overall survival (OS). OS-influencing factors were identified using the Cox proportional risk regression model. Finally, 63 patients who received THPK treatment and 60 patients who had TPK treatment were included. The THPK group had higher DCR (77.78% vs. 55.00%, P=0.007) and ORR (20.63% vs. 13.34%, P=0.282) than the TPK group did. The survival analysis curve also showed that the median OS was substantially longer in the THPK group than in the TPK group (OS: 21 months vs. 14 months, P=0.039). After multivariate Cox regression-corrected analysis, extrahepatic metastases (P=0.002) and methemoglobin >400 (P=0.041) were adverse influences on OS, but the THPK group (relative to the TPK group) was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (P=0.027). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the addition of HAIC therapy to TPK treatment in patients with BCLC stage C, age ≦60 years, ECOG grade 0 and lobular distribution of tumors prolonged overall survival time and improved prognosis. Except for nausea, there was no difference in the adverse events between the two groups. In patients with unresectable HCC, the THPK group had a longer OS and similar adverse events compared to the TPK group. In the future, TACE-HAIC in combination with targeted and immunotherapy may be a more effective therapeutic option for hepatocellular carcinoma that cannot be surgically removed.

Gefitinib: Combination Therapy and Complex Delivery Systems (Review)

Introduction. The search for new methods of therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an urgent task of modern science. Gefitinib is a targeted drug widely used in the treatment of NSCLC in patients with a mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase domain. However, using of gefitinib and other drugs from the group of tyrosine kinase inhibitors is to limited by rapidly developing resistance, for this reason finding of a ways overcome drug resistance is actual part of research interests.Text. The review is devoted to the use of gefitinib in modern developments: introduction to various targeted delivery systems (liposomes, micelles, microspheres, etc.), studying it in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, as well as in combination with photo- or thermosensitive compounds in various micro- and nanostructured complexes.Conclusion. As a result of the analysis of literature data, it was shown that, despite the fact that gefitinib is a first-generation drug, foreign and Russian researchers consider it quite promising for further use in the treatment of NSCLC. At the same time, developments are being carried out both in the field of expanding combination therapy and in the field of creating complex structures of targeted action, into which, in addition to gefitinib, photosensitizers or other compounds with photo- or thermosensitive effects are introduced.

Surgery plus TKIs therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Abstract Introduction In this era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the clinical benefit of surgery for patients with metastatic or recurrent gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor (GIST) is not well defined. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the survival advantage of adding surgery in patients with recurrent or metastatic GIST. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Ovid’s database was conducted. Relevant studies published by 31 July 2022 on the role of surgery in recurrent or metastatic GIST were identified. Research quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Results Eight studies involving 842 patients were included. The four included studies covered 3-year survival and included 441 patients, of whom 302 received TKIs, and 139 received TKIs plus surgery. 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the TKIs plus surgery group than in the TKIs group (OR=2.37, 95% CI 1.45–3.88, P = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival was 69.0% in the TKIs plus surgery group compared with 49.1% in the TKIs only group. Survival was significantly higher in TKIs plus surgery group (OR = 2.69, 95%Cl 1.49–4.86, P=0.001). Four studies, including 453 patients, indicated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). The pooled analysis revealed the TKIs plus surgery group did have a better PFS than the TKIs only group (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 1.45–11.16, P=0.008). Three included studies focused on gastrointestinal stromal tumor liver metastasis (GLM). The role of surgery plus TKIs had statistically significant better 5-year overall survival as compared with TKI treatment alone (OR = 2.34, 95% Cl 1.30–4.22, P=0.005). Conclusions Treatment with surgical resection and TKIs could significantly improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent or metastatic GIST.

The Impact of Pretransplant Use of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia - A Single-institution Retrospective Study.

Objective Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a malignant hematological disorder, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) was its only curative treatment until the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Allo-SCT is still considered for CML patients who are resistant to TKIs and in an advanced phase. Currently, second- and third-generation (2/3G TKIs are typically incorporated into the first-line treatment of CML. However, the impact of 2/3G TKIs on subsequent allo-SCT remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the effect of 2/3G TKIs on allo-SCT. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the effect of pretransplant therapy with TKIs on the outcome of allo-SCT for CML using clinical data at our institution. Patients Thirty-two CML patients who received their first allo-SCT procedure at our institute from 2001 to 2020 were included. We divided the patients into three subgroups based on TKI treatment before allo-SCT. Patients receiving no TKIs, only imatinib (IM), and 2/3G TKIs were classified into the Non-TKI, IM, and 2/3G TKI groups, respectively. Results In a univariate analysis, the pretransplant use of 2/3G TKIs was significantly associated with a higher 5-year overall survival (91.7%) and relapse-free survival (75.0%) than the use of IM (37.5% and 12.5%) in patients presenting with or progressing to the advanced phase. In addition, pretransplant use of 2/3G TKIs did not increase the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Conclusion We demonstrated that the pretransplant use of 2/3G TKIs was safe and improved the outcome of CML patients who presented with or progressed to the advanced phase without increasing the frequency of GVHD.

Safety and Efficacy of Second-Line TKI Plus Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

ObjectivesGuidelines recommend clinical trials or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the first-line option for systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) with limited efficacy. However, the preferred subsequent options remain unclear when patients progress after first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 plus TKI therapy as the second-line regimen in nccRCC. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020. The baseline characteristics of the patients and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ResultsThe current study enrolled 65 patients, with a median age of 48 (interquartile 37–60) years. Among all patients, 21 received TKI monotherapy while 44 patients received combination therapy (TKI plus anti-PD1). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 38.5% and 56.9%, respectively. ORR (50.0% vs. 14.3%, P = .006) and DCR (70.5% vs. 28.6%, P = .001) were improved in the combination group compared with the TKI group. The overall second-line PFS was 7.7 (95% CI: 6.1-9.3) months and OS was 25.2 (19.5-30.8) months. Patients receiving combination therapy had a longer PFS compared with those receiving TKI monotherapy [median PFS (95% CI): 9.2 (5.9-12.4) vs. 5.4 (2.6-8.2) m, Log-rank P = .002]. The incidence of treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or higher was comparable between the 2 groups (56.8% vs. 52.4%). ConclusionAnti-PD-1 plus TKI therapy appeared effective and safe in the treatment of patients with metastatic nccRCC who progressed after first-line TKIs.

Effect of Different Timing of Local Brain Radiotherapy on Survival of EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Patients with Limited Brain Metastases.

(1) Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been the first line therapy for EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the role and the optimal time of brain radiotherapy remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the role of upfront brain stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) and the impact of deferral radiotherapy on patients' clinical outcomes. (2) Methods: We retrospectively studied 53 EGFR-mutant LAC patients with limited synchronous BMs between 2014 and 2020 at our institute. The limited BMs was defined with one to four BM lesions, with a maximal size of ≤4 cm. Patients were categorized into two groups: upfront brain SRS (upfront RT) and upfront TKIs. The intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between groups were analyzed. (3) Results: The median iPFS (21.0 vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.002) and PFS (20.0 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.004) of the upfront RT group was longer than that of the upfront TKI group. There were no significant differences in median OS (30.0 vs. 26.0 months, p = 0.552) between the two groups. The upfront RT group is less likely to suffer from intracranial progression of the original sites than that of upfront TKIs during the disease course (36.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that the Karnofsky Performance Scale and the presence of synchronous meningeal metastases were associated with overall survival. (4) Conclusions: Compared with upfront TKI, the combination of upfront SRS with TKIs can improve the iPFS and PFS in EGFR-mutant LAC with synchronous BMs. The addition of upfront brain SRS was useful for the original intracranial metastatic lesions.

Severe and fatal adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy has changed the treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, little evidence exists on the treatment-related severe adverse events (SAEs) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) of ICI combination therapy in mRCC. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ICI combination therapy versus conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapy in mRCC. Data on SAEs and FAEs were analyzed using revman5.4 software. Eight RCTs (n=5380) were identified. The analysis showed no differences in SAEs (60.5% vs. 64.5%) and FAEs (1.2% vs. 0.8%) between the ICI and TKI groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95%CI 0.58-1.19, p=0.300 and OR, 1.54; 95%CI 0.89-2.69, p=0.120, respectively). ICI-combination therapy was associated with less risk of hematotoxicities, including anemia (OR, 0.24, 95%CI 0.15-0.38, p<0.001), neutropenia (OR, 0.07, 95%CI 0.03-0.14, p<0.001), and thrombocytopenia (OR, 0.05, 95%CI 0.02-0.12, p<0.001), but with increased risks of hepatotoxicities (ALT increase [OR, 3.39, 95%CI 2.39-4.81, p<0.001] and AST increase [OR, 2.71, 95%CI 1.81-4.07, p<0.001]), gastrointestinal toxicities (amylase level increase [OR, 2.32, 95%CI 1.33-4.05, p=0.003] and decreased appetite [OR, 1.77, 95%CI 1.08-2.92, p=0.020]), endocrine toxicity (adrenal insufficiency [OR, 11.27, 95%CI 1.55-81.87, p=0.020]) and nephrotoxicity of proteinuria (OR, 2.21, 95%CI 1.06-4.61, p=0.030). Compared with TKI, ICI combination therapy has less hematotoxicity in mRCC but more specific hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, endocrine toxicity, and nephrotoxicity, with a similar severe toxicity profile. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023412669.

Characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) are associated with poor prognosis and resistance to traditional therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to elucidate the characteristics and treatment patterns to improve outcomes among this population in Taiwan. Patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins from 2011 to 2021 were reviewed. The treatment groups were classified as platinum-based chemotherapy (PtC), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and others. The response to therapy, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and factors associated with survival were analyzed. Among the 71 patients, most were never-smoking males with stage IVB adenocarcinoma. The most common first-line (1L) regimen was PtC, followed by TKI. The most common second-line (2L) regimen was TKI. The median PFS of 1L treatment was 5.03 months, and the median OS was 18.43 months. Compared with that of TKI, 1L PtC use was associated with a higher ORR (26.3% vs. 9.1%) and DCR (60.5% vs. 18.2%) and a longer PFS (5.37 vs. 3.13 months, p = 0.044). PFS was also significantly longer in the 2L PtC group than in the 2L TKI group (4.73 vs. 2.25 months, p = 0.047). No patients receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimen exhibited a therapeutic response. This study demonstrated the heterogeneous clinical characteristics and treatment pattern of NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, underscoring the need for more effective therapies for this distinct molecular subtype.

Comparative arrhythmia patterns among patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Limited studies have shown an association between treatment-limiting arrhythmias and TKI, particularly ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. We sought to comprehensively assess the arrhythmia burden in patients receiving ibrutinib vs non-BTK TKI vs non-TKI therapies. We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who received long-term cardiac event monitors while on ibrutinib, non-BTK TKIs, or non-TKI therapy for a hematologic malignancy between 2014 and 2022. One hundred ninety-three patients with hematologic malignancies were included (ibrutinib = 72, non-BTK TKI = 46, non-TKI therapy = 75). The average duration of TKI therapy was 32months in the ibrutinib group vs 64months in the non-BTK TKI group (p = 0.003). The ibrutinib group had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (n = 32 [44%]) compared to the non-BTK TKI (n = 7 [15%], p = 0.001) and non-TKI (n = 15 [20%], p = 0.002) groups. Similarly, the prevalence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was higher in the ibrutinib group (n = 31, 43%) than the non-BTK TKI (n = 8 [17%], p = 0.004) and non-TKI groups (n = 20 [27%], p = 0.04). TKI therapy was held in 25% (n = 18) of patients on ibrutinib vs 4% (n = 2) on non-BTK TKIs (p = 0.005) secondary to arrhythmias. In this large retrospective analysis of patients with hematologic malignancies, patients receiving ibrutinib had a higher prevalence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias compared to those receiving other TKI, with a higher rate of treatment interruption due to arrhythmias.

Radio-iodine refractory thyroid cancer patients: a tailored follow-up based on clinicopathological features

ObjectiveTo report the experience of a single center for the selection of radioiodine-refractory (RAIR) thyroid cancer patients (RAIR-TC) who needed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) treatment.Patients and methodsWe evaluated all features of 279 RAIR-TC patients both at the time of diagnosis and at the RAIR diagnosis.ResultsNinety-nine patients received indication to TKIs (Group A), while 180 remained under active surveillance (Group B). Group A had greater tumor size, more aggressive histotype, more frequent macroscopic extrathyroidal extension, distant metastases, advanced AJCC stage, and higher ATA risk of recurrence. After RAIR diagnosis, 93.9% of Group A had progression of disease (PD) after which TKIs’ therapy was started. The remaining 6.1% of patients had a so severe disease at the time of RAIR diagnosis that TKIs’ therapy was immediately started. Among Group B, 42.7% had up to 5 PD, but the majority underwent local treatments. The mean time from RAIR diagnosis to the first PD was shorter in Group A, and the evidence of PD within 25 months from RAIR diagnosis was associated with the decision to start TKIs.ConclusionsAccording to our results, a more tailored follow-up should be applied to RAIR-TC patients. A too strict monitoring and too many imaging evaluations might be avoided in those with less-aggressive features and low rate of progression. Conversely, RAIR-TC with an advanced stage at diagnosis and a first PD occurring within 25 months from RAIR diagnosis would require a more stringent follow-up to avoid a late start of TKIs.