Typical Antipsychotics Research Articles

2001-2021 Comparative Persistence of Oral Antipsychotics in Patients Initiating Treatment: Superiority of Clozapine in Time-to-Treatment Discontinuation.

Continuous antipsychotic (AP) therapy is crucial for managing psychotic disorders, and its early interruption reflects the drug's failure. Real-world epidemiological research is essential for confirming experimental data and generating new research hypotheses. The persistence of oral APs in a large population sample from 2000 to 2021 was analyzed by comparing AP prescriptions over this period across four Italian provinces, using dispensing data linked via a record-linkage procedure among regional healthcare utilization databases. We calculated personalized daily dosages and assessed time-to-treatment discontinuation over a 3-month period for patients initiating AP treatment. Treatment persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression, with adjustments for age and sex. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) were favored over first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), with olanzapine as the most prescribed. Within the study time frame, 42,434 individuals were prescribed a new continuous AP regimen. The analysis revealed 24 significant differences within 28 comparisons. As a class, SGAs demonstrated better treatment persistence than FGAs (HR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.73, 0.79). Clozapine stood out for its superior persistence, surpassing all other SGAs, notably olanzapine (HR: 0.85; 95%CI: 0.79-0.91) and risperidone (HR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.74-0.87). Olanzapine and aripiprazole showed better results than both risperidone and quetiapine. Quetiapine showed inferior 3-month persistence in all pairwise comparisons. The study results provide insight into the performance dynamics among SGAs: clozapine, despite being one of the less frequently dispensed APs in our sample, emerged as a significant prescription choice. The significance of pharmacoepidemiological studies in complementing experimental findings is also underscored.

Cariprazine in Hospital Treatment of Acute Psychotic Conditions Due to Comorbid Schizophrenia and Chemical Addictions

Background: endogenous psychoses complicated with different addictions have special psychopathological structure including delirious episodes, true hallucinations combined with typical positive symptoms of schizophrenia. These cases are difficult for treatment due to non-compliance of patients and their bad tolerance to drugs. The aim was to study the most effective psychopharmacological treatment using cariprazine for acute psychotic states in paranoid schizophrenia combined with chemical addictions. Patients and Methods: the study was conducted at psychiatric hospitals of Tomsk region, St. Petersburg, Nizhnevartovsk and Noyabrsk from 2018 to 2024. 208 men aged 18 to 45 years suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and dependent on psychoactive substances were examined. The main group made up 104 in-patients, who took cariprazine alone or in combination with haloperidol or chlorpromazine. The control group included 104 in-patients treated with other antipsychotics (aripiprazole, risperidone, olanzapine). Research methods: clinical and psychopathological, psychometric (PANSS, SANS, CGI, GAF), statistical (Python 3.11.0; R version 3.2.4; SPSS Statistics Base 22.0). Results: It was revealed that when comparing the control group with the main group, similar indicators were observed on the CGI and GAF scales on the 2nd week of the study, and on the 4th week of the study, compared with the control group, an improvement in indicators on the PANSS, SANS, CGI, GAF scales was observed. Conclusions: Cariprazine, compared with other atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole), showed a distinct antipsychotic effect in the treatment of acute psychotic states in patients with schizophrenia dependent on psychoactive substances. By the end of the 2nd week after hospitalization, when treating with cariprazine at an average dose of 3 to 6 mg/day in combination with typical neuroleptics (haloperidol, chlorpromazine) or a tranquilizer, the most pronounced antipsychotic effect is achieved. Subsequent isolated use of cariprazine at a therapeutic dose of 3–4.5 mg/day has an effect similar to that of leading atypical antipsychotics by the end of the 4th week of treatment. Unlike other atypical antipsychotics, cariprazine was more effective in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia, which made it possible to achieve an improvement in overall functioning, increase the duration of remission, and reduce the risk of rehospitalization and the development of hospitalism.

Challenges in the Management of Tuberous Sclerosis-associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders

Abstract Tuberous sclerosis is a rare autosomal dominant multisystem disorder of genetic origin affecting TSC1 and TSC2 genes. Individuals with tuberous sclerosis are affected by a broad range of behavioral, academic, intellectual, psychiatric, and psychosocial problems, typically underidentified and undertreated. We are presenting the case of a young male with tuberous sclerosis presented with seizures followed by the development of behavioral and dermatological manifestations. We faced difficulties in the management due to the lack of appropriate guidelines. Initially, no response was seen with atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, and when some improvement was noticed with typical antipsychotics, extrapyramidal symptoms intervened in the progress and caused more distress to the patient. Hence, one should focus on early recognition and prompt treatment of the individual suffering from TSC. The lack of proper guidelines for managing neuropsychiatric manifestation poses a significant challenge. More research is needed in this area.

Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices for In-patients with Schizophrenia

Results: consumption of antipsychotics in hospital for the period 2015–2022 characterized by a decrease in the proportion of typical antipsychotics (TA) to 12.8% due to an increase in the proportion of atypical antipsychotics (AA) to 61.0% and long-acting antipsychotics (LA) to 26.2%. The administration of antipsychotics by hospital treatment units was relatively uniform. Clozapine (26.9%), zuclopenthixol (20.0%), haloperidol (10.3%), olanzapine (10.3%), risperidone (9.3%), quetiapine (8.2%), paliperidone (4.1%) accounted for 89.1% of all antipsychotics consumed. The total proportion of cariprazine, pericyazine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, levomepromazine, chlorprothixene, chlorpromazine, tiapride and trifluoperazine, sertindole, lurasidone, sulpiride, flupenthixol and brexpiprazole was 10.9%. Among the medications prescribed to patients with schizophrenia, the leading ones were risperidone (36.2%), haloperidol (17.1%), olanzapine (15.6%), and clozapine (10.8%). The frequency of prescription of other drugs was less than 10.0%. The share of TA was 26.3%, AA — 73.7%. In the vast majority of cases (98.1%), patients received monotherapy. Conclusion: the data obtained on the structure of antipsychotic prescriptions indicate that our approaches correspond to the global trend of the predominant use of second-generation antipsychotics in the in-patient treatment of schizophrenia.

Real-World Data Mining for Signal Detection of Antipsychotics-Associated Adverse Events Using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) Database.

Background and Objectives: Recent studies suggest that the binary categorization of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) as being primarily responsible for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for cardiometabolic abnormalities is an oversimplification. SGAs also demonstrate antagonistic affinity for D2 receptors, indicating their potential to induce EPSs. This study utilized the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) database to explore adverse drug event (ADE) signals related to both FGAs and SGAs. Materials and Methods: Relevant ADE reports from January 2013 to December 2022 were extracted from the KAERS database and analyzed using disproportionality analysis, employing the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and information component (IC) with its 95% lower confidence interval (LCI) indices. Results: Of the initial dataset of 2,890,702 ADE reports, those with insufficient data and duplicates were removed, resulting in a final dataset of 5249 reports for analysis. Aripiprazole, an SGA, showed signals for movement disorders, including EPSs (PRR 4.7, ROR 4.8, IC 2.2), tremors (PRR 5.3, ROR 5.4, IC 2.4), and akathisia (PRR 18.6, ROR 19.3, IC 3.5). Notably, for quetiapine, cardiovascular signals were detected, including increased blood pressure (PRR 2.1, ROR 2.3, IC 0.5), and tachyarrhythmia (PRR 13.9, ROR 14.1, IC 1.8), along with peripheral edema (PRR 2.5, ROR 2.5, IC 0.2). Metabolic abnormalities, such as weight gain and increased appetite, were identified for four SGAs: aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. Safety signals related to movement disorders were not detectable for FGAs, likely due to the limited number of ADE reports available for analysis. Conclusions: Our study findings support that the distribution of ADEs between FGAs and SGAs is not strictly binary. Aripiprazole, despite being an SGA, showed signals for extrapyramidal movement disorders. Four SGAs (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) were linked to metabolic side effects, while quetiapine was associated with cardiovascular safety signals.

Neonatal outcomes after in utero exposure to antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adverse neonatal outcomes following in utero antipsychotic exposure remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate associations between in utero first- and second-generation antipsychotic exposure and various neonatal outcomes. The primary outcome was small for gestational age. Secondary outcomes included other birth weight-related measures, prematurity and neonatal outcomes. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for on 8th July 2023. Two reviewers independently selected studies reporting associations between exposure and neonatal outcomes (all designs were eligible, no language or time restriction) and extracted data. ROBINS-I was used for risk of bias assessment. Meta-analyses were performed. Measures of association were odds ratios and mean differences. Thirty-one observational studies were included. Regarding small for gestational age < 10th percentile, meta-analysis was only performed for second-generation antipsychotics and showed no evidence for an association (OR 1.31 [95%CI 0.83; 2.07]; I²=46%; phet=0.13, n = 4 studies). First-generation antipsychotics were associated with an increased risk of small for gestational age < 3rd percentile (OR 1.37 [95%CI 1.02; 1.83]; I²=60%; phet=0.04, n = 5) and a lower mean birthweight (MD -135g [95%CI -203; -66]; I²=53%; phet=0.07, n = 5). Second-generation antipsychotics were associated with large for gestational age > 97th percentile (OR 1.56 [95%CI 1.31; 1.87]; I²=4%; phet=0.37, n = 4) and Apgar score < 7 (OR 1.64 [95%CI 1.09; 2.47]; I²=47%; phet=0.13, n = 4). Both types of antipsychotics were associated with increased risks of preterm birth and neonatal hospitalization. Despite potential confounding in the studies, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that newborns of mothers using antipsychotics during pregnancy are potentially at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov. Prospero Registration Number CRD42023401805.

TRATAMENTO FARMACOLÓGICO DA ESQUIZOFRENIA: PASSADO, PRESENTE E FUTURO

Schizophrenia is a chronic and severe psychiatric disorder characterised by the manifestation of positive and negative symptoms and/or cognitive dysfunction. Treatment typically includes psychotherapy, sociotherapy and pharmacological therapy, which consists of the use of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, as well as dopaminergic system stabilisers. Although they do not provide a cure, these treatments can reduce the intensity and frequency of symptoms, resulting in improved quality of life and a quicker reintegration into social life. Thus, the aim of the present study was to conduct a narrative literature review on the clinical evolution of antipsychotic use throughout history, as well as to discuss potential new drugs that are still in clinical research. Studies have shown that typical antipsychotics are effective in treating positive symptoms but have no impact on negative symptoms and can even exacerbate or provoke them. Additionally, they produce highly limiting side effects, such as movement disorders. Atypical antipsychotics, on the other hand, are capable of reducing both positive and negative symptoms, and they also present fewer side effects related to the extrapyramidal motor system. However, they tend to cause metabolic disturbances. Conversely, dopaminergic system stabilisers also treat both positive and negative symptoms, with side effects that are generally better tolerated, along with a lower propensity to cause weight gain and motor disturbances. It is worth noting that many patients are unable to tolerate the various adverse reactions of the available antipsychotics. Moreover, some patients are or become refractory to their therapeutic effects. Consequently, there is currently a focus on developing new agents that have different pharmacological targets. Some of these potential new drugs have shown efficacy in refractory patients, representing a potential paradigm shift in the treatment of the disorder.

Age and sex differences in outpatient antipsychotic prescriptions for schizophrenia: a claims data study.

Most studies on antipsychotic efficacy and safety, including sex differences, focus on young schizophrenia patients. However, with an aging population, the number of older schizophrenia patients is increasing. This group faces challenges due to varying treatment responses and higher risks of adverse reactions, and guidelines often lack specific recommendations due to insufficient trials. Therefore, we investigated how age and sex influence antipsychotic prescribing practices in schizophrenia using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD). We included patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (ICD-10 code F20.X) who had been prescribed at least one antipsychotic on an outpatient basis in at least two consecutive quarters in 2020, analyzing prescription data for 49,681 patients. Key findings include a notable preference for second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) across all age groups, especially in younger patients, possibly due to their perceived better tolerability and efficacy. Treatment intensity with SGAs (expressed as the defined daily doses of SGAs per patient in 2020) initially increased with age, peaked among 35- to 44-year-olds, and then decreased, with the lowest treatment intensity in patients aged 65years and older. The prescription patterns of specific SGAs and first-generation antipsychotics varied across age groups, highlighting the complexity of treatment decisions in schizophrenia management. Sex differences in prescription frequency and treatment intensity were also observed. The basic recommendation of the guideline to consider sex and age when prescribing antipsychotics therefore appears to be followed. Whether this prescribing practice is really optimal for older male and female schizophrenia patients, however, still needs to be proven in clinical trials.

COMPARISON BETWEEN OLANZAPINE AND HALOPERIDOL AS TREATMENT OF ACUTE AGITATION

Introduction – Antipsychotics have been used as a treatment of choice in acute agitation, with haloperidol being the most widely used from the first generation, and olanzapine from the second generation. Therefore, there is a need to understand these drugs, particularly in their efficacy and safety as a treatment of acute agitation. Methods – This review uses several works of literature between 2011 to 2021 that discuss olanzapine and haloperidol as treatments for acute agitation. Results – Atypical antipsychotic agents are equally effective when compared to typical antipsychotics in treating acute agitation Discuss – On several head-to-head comparisons, olanzapine showed superiority to haloperidol based on the onset of efficacy. Conclusion – Agitated patients interfere with the diagnostic and treatment process. First-line treatment involves verbal de-escalation for patients and if failed, a physician could use pharmacological intervention in the form of rapid tranquillization to continue the therapeutic process. When determining which drug to use, a physician must consider both efficacy and safety. Due to the heterogeneity of study results, it is difficult to conclude that a certain agent is the best treatment for acute agitation. Olanzapine and haloperidol are equally effective antipsychotic agents in treating agitated symptoms. Olanzapine has numerous advantageous properties, including a lesser risk of causing extrapyramidal side effects that in turn can aggravate agitation, but the downside of olanzapine is that it is expensive and has limited availability compared to haloperidol. On the other hand, haloperidol, as a monotherapy or combination therapy either with an antihistamine-anticholinergic or benzodiazepine is a good alternative. Therefore, determining which agent to use should consider the comprehensive state of the patient, as is almost always the case when psychotropic medications are prescribed. Keywords: olanzapine, haloperidol, agitation.

Prescribing patterns for older-age bipolar disorder patients discharged from two public mental hospitals in Taiwan, 2006-2019.

Older-age bipolar disorder (OABD) is commonly defined as bipolar disorder in individuals aged 60 or more. There have been no studies to examine temporal trends in the pharmacological treatment of OABD. We aimed to investigate prescription changes among OABD patients discharged from two public mental hospitals in Taiwan from 2006 to 2019. OABD patients discharged from the two study hospitals, from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2019 (n = 1072), entered the analysis. Prescribed drugs at discharge, including mood stabilisers (i.e., lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine), antipsychotics (i.e., second- and first-generation antipsychotics (SGAs and FGAs)), and antidepressants, were investigated. Complex polypharmacy was defined as the use of three or more agents among the prescribed drugs. Temporal trends of each prescribing pattern were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage Trend test. The most commonly prescribed drugs were SGAs (72.0%), followed by valproate (48.4%) and antidepressants (21.7%). The prescription rates of SGAs, antidepressants, antidepressants without mood stabilisers, and complex polypharmacy significantly increased over time, whereas the prescription rates of mood stabilisers, lithium, FGAs, and antidepressants plus mood stabilisers significantly decreased. Prescribing patterns changed remarkably for OABD patients over a 14-year period. The decreased use of lithium and increased use of antidepressants did not reflect bipolar treatment guidelines. Future research should examine whether such prescribing patterns are associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of Prescription Patterns in Management of Agitation in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department

Objective: This research aims to evaluate patterns of prescription of medications used to manage acute agitation in adult Iranian patients at the emergency department (ED) of Roozbeh Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran. Method: The study analyzed data from the medical records of 252 patients who received pharmacotherapy for agitation. Results: The findings revealed that 181 patients (71.82%) were given typical antipsychotics, with haloperidol being the most commonly prescribed medication. Atypical antipsychotics were administered to 24 participants (9.52%), primarily olanzapine, and 52 patients (20.63%) received benzodiazepines, predominantly lorazepam. The treatment response was also assessed as appropriate in 224 patients (88.89%) and inappropriate in 28 patients (11.11%). Conclusion: The study recommends providing new-generation medications to developing countries and underscores the importance of updating student educational programs.

Pharmacological Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia-An Update.

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychotic disorder comprising positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Negative symptoms are associated with stigma, worse functional outcomes, and a significant deterioration in quality of life. Clinical diagnosis is challenging despite its significance, and current treatments offer little improvement in the burden of negative symptoms. This article reviews current pharmacological strategies for treating negative symptoms. Dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, cholinergic, anti-inflammatory compounds, hormones, and psychostimulants are explored. Finally, we review pharmacological global treatment guidelines for negative symptoms. In general, switching to a second-generation antipsychotic seems to be most often recommended for patients with schizophrenia on first-generation antipsychotics, and an add-on antidepressant is considered when depression is also present. However, the treatment of negative symptoms remains an unmet need. Future, larger clinical studies and meta-analyses are needed to establish effective pharmacological agents for the effective treatment of negative symptoms.

Incidence of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome During Antipsychotic Treatment in Children and Youth: A National Cohort Study.

Objective: The incidence of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a rare, potentially fatal adverse effect of antipsychotics, among children and youth is unknown. This cohort study estimated NMS incidence in antipsychotic users age 5-24 years and described its variation according to patient and antipsychotic characteristics. Methods: We used national Medicaid data (2004-2013) to identify patients beginning antipsychotic treatment and calculated the incidence of NMS during antipsychotic current use. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) assessed the independent contribution of patient and antipsychotic characteristics to NMS risk. Results: The 1,032,084 patients had 131 NMS cases during 1,472,558 person-years of antipsychotic current use, or 8.9 per 100,000 person-years. The following five factors independently predicted increased incidence: age 18-24 years (HR [95% CI] = 2.45 [1.65-3.63]), schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (HR = 5.86 [3.16-10.88]), neurodevelopmental disorders (HR = 7.11 [4.02-12.56]), antipsychotic dose >200mg chlorpromazine-equivalents (HR = 1.71 [1.15-2.54]), and first-generation antipsychotics (HR = 4.32 [2.74-6.82]). NMS incidence per 100,000 person-years increased from 1.8 (1.1-3.0) for those with none of these factors to 198.1 (132.8-295.6) for those with 4 or 5 factors. Findings were essentially unchanged in sensitivity analyses that restricted the study data to second-generation antipsychotics, children age 5-17 years, and the 5 most recent calendar years. Conclusion: In children and youth treated with antipsychotics, five factors independently identified patients with increased NMS incidence: age 18-24 years, schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, first-generation drugs, and antipsychotic doses greater than 200 mg chlorpromazine-equivalents. Patients with 4 or 5 of these factors had more than 100 times the incidence of those with none. These findings could improve early identification of children and youth with elevated NMS risk, potentially leading to earlier detection and improved outcomes.

Dysfunction of the NMDA Receptor in the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia and/or the Pathomechanisms of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia.

For several decades, the dopamine hypothesis contributed to the discovery of numerous typical and atypical antipsychotics and was the sole hypothesis for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. However, neither typical nor atypical antipsychotics, other than clozapine, have been effective in addressing negative symptoms and cognitive impairments, which are indices for the prognostic and disability outcomes of schizophrenia. Following the development of atypical antipsychotics, the therapeutic targets for antipsychotics expanded beyond the blockade of dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors to explore the partial agonism of the D2 receptor and the modulation of new targets, such as D3, 5-HT1A, 5-HT7, and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Despite these efforts, to date, psychiatry has not successfully developed antipsychotics with antipsychotic properties proven to be superior to those of clozapine. The glutamate hypothesis, another hypothesis regarding the pathophysiology/pathomechanism of schizophrenia, was proposed based on clinical findings that N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists, such as phencyclidine and ketamine, induce schizophrenia-like psychotic episodes. Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) revealed that approximately 30% of the risk genes for schizophrenia (the total number was over one hundred) encode proteins associated with glutamatergic transmission. These findings supported the validation of the glutamate hypothesis, which was inspired by the clinical findings regarding NMDAR antagonists. Additionally, these clinical and genetic findings suggest that schizophrenia is possibly a syndrome with complicated pathomechanisms that are affected by multiple biological and genetic vulnerabilities. The glutamate hypothesis has been the most extensively investigated pathophysiology/pathomechanism hypothesis, other than the dopamine hypothesis. Studies have revealed the possibility that functional abnormalities of the NMDAR play important roles in the pathophysiology/pathomechanism of schizophrenia. However, no antipsychotics derived from the glutamatergic hypothesis have yet been approved for the treatment of schizophrenia or treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Considering the increasing evidence supporting the potential pro-cognitive effects of glutamatergic agents and the lack of sufficient medications to treat the cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia, these previous setbacks cannot preclude research into potential novel glutamate modulators. Given this background, to emphasize the importance of the dysfunction of the NMDAR in the pathomechanism and/or pathophysiology of schizophrenia, this review introduces the increasing findings on the functional abnormalities in glutamatergic transmission associated with the NMDAR.

Drug-induced liver injury associated with atypical generation antipsychotics from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BackgroundRecent studies have shown that liver enzyme abnormalities were not only seen with typical antipsychotics (APs) but also with atypical antipsychotics (AAPs). During the last 20 years, the hepatotoxicity of various antipsychotics received much attention. However, systematic evaluations of hepatotoxicity associated with APs are limited.MethodsAll drug related hepatic disorders cases were retrieved from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database using standardized MedDRA queries (SMQ) from the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022. Patient characteristics and prognosis were assessed. In this study, a case/non-case approach was used to calculate reporting odds ratio (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We calculated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) RORs for each AAPs.ResultsA total of 408 DILI cases were attributed to AAPs during the study period. 18.6% of these were designated as serious adverse event (SAE), which include death (19.74%), hospitalization (68.42%), disability (2.63%), and life-threatening (9.21%) outcomes. The RORs values in descending order were: quetiapine (ROR = 0.782), clozapine (ROR = 0.665), aripiprazole (ROR = 0.507), amisulpride (ROR = 0.308), paliperidone (ROR = 0.212), risperidone (ROR = 0.198), ziprasidone (0.131).ConclusionThe result found in our study was that all AAPs didn’t have a significant correlation with increased hepatotoxicity. Future analysis of the FAERS database in conjunction with other data sources will be essential for continuous monitoring of DILI.

Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Psychotic Disorders Using Artificial Intelligence Methods: A Scoping Review.

Psychotic disorders are major psychiatric disorders that can impact multiple domains including physical, social, and psychological functioning within individuals with these conditions. Being able to better predict the outcomes of psychotic disorders will allow clinicians to identify illness subgroups and optimize treatment strategies in a timely manner. In this scoping review, we aimed to examine the accuracy of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in predicting the clinical outcomes of patients with psychotic disorders as well as determine the relevant predictors of these outcomes. This review was guided by the PRISMA Guidelines for Scoping Reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched for relevant published articles in English until 1 February 2024. Thirty articles were included in this review. These studies were mainly conducted in the West (63%) and Asia (37%) and published within the last 5 years (83.3%). The clinical outcomes included symptomatic improvements, illness course, and social functioning. The machine learning models utilized data from various sources including clinical, cognitive, and biological variables such as genetic, neuroimaging measures. In terms of main machine learning models used, the most common approaches were support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, and linear regression models. No specific machine learning approach outperformed the other approaches consistently across the studies, and an overall range of predictive accuracy was observed with an AUC from 0.58 to 0.95. Specific predictors of clinical outcomes included demographic characteristics (gender, socioeconomic status, accommodation, education, and employment); social factors (activity level and interpersonal relationships); illness features (number of relapses, duration of relapses, hospitalization rates, cognitive impairments, and negative and disorganization symptoms); treatment (prescription of first-generation antipsychotics, high antipsychotic doses, clozapine, use of electroconvulsive therapy, and presence of metabolic syndrome); and structural and functional neuroimaging abnormalities, especially involving the temporal and frontal brain regions. The current review highlights the potential and need to further refine AI and machine learning models in parsing out the complex interplay of specific variables that contribute to the clinical outcome prediction of psychotic disorders.

Pharmacotherapy profile for mothers with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in a psychiatric mother–baby unit

AbstractBackgroundPharmacotherapy treatment is used to manage women with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder admitted to a mother–baby unit (MBU).AimThe aims of this study were (1) to examine prescribing practices for women with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in an MBU, (2) to assess alignment with the Mental health care in the perinatal period: Australian clinical practice guideline and (3) to examine the classes of typical and atypical antipsychotics prescribed to mothers with schizophrenia.MethodA retrospective audit of women with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder admitted to a psychiatric MBU, located in Queensland, Australia, was conducted from March 2017–July 2019. The exclusion criteria included women admitted with depression, anxiety, personality disorders, and postpartum psychosis. Pharmacotherapy treatment details were extracted at commencement of admission, mid‐way through admission, and discharge. Descriptive statistics were completed. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: EX/2023/QGC/102306). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study was deemed a quality improvement activity and complied with Chapter 2.3 of the National Statement of Ethical Conduct in Research and involved only routinely collected data.ResultsOf the 53 mothers included in the study, 29 (55%) had schizophrenia and 24 (45%) had bipolar affective disorder. In addition, 97% of women with schizophrenia received atypical antipsychotics. Five women (21%) with bipolar affective disorder (mean age = 31.60 years, standard deviation = 6.19 years) were prescribed sodium valproate, with four women given contraception. Sodium valproate or lamotrigine were prescribed to four women (67%) with bipolar affective disorder whilst breastfeeding. Of mothers prescribed lithium, 92% did not breastfeed. Overall, 44% of women involuntarily admitted received antipsychotic depot medication compared with 38% of voluntary patients. Results are discussed in relation to the national guidelines.ConclusionThis is the first naturalistic study to examine the pharmacotherapy management of postpartum women admitted to a psychiatric MBU with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder. The study highlights that prescribing patterns across three time points during admission were generally in alignment with Australian national guidelines.

TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Introduction: The treatment of schizophrenia in elderly patients presents a significant clinical challenge due to the disease's particularities in this age group. Schizophrenia is a chronic mental disorder characterized by profound disturbances in thought, emotions, and behavior. In elderly patients, the condition may manifest in a more complex manner, with exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and cognitive decline that negatively impacts quality of life. The interplay between aging and schizophrenia requires a therapeutic approach tailored to the specific needs of the elderly, considering comorbidities, polypharmacy, and adverse effects of treatments. Objective: The objective of the systematic review was to evaluate treatment strategies for schizophrenia in elderly patients, examining the effectiveness and safety of available therapeutic interventions, as well as the specific clinical management issues within this population. Methodology: The systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA checklist, utilizing the databases PubMed, Scielo, and Web of Science. Five main descriptors were used: "schizophrenia," "elderly," "treatment," "antipsychotic therapy," and "effectiveness." Articles published in the last 10 years were included. Inclusion criteria were: studies focused on patients aged 65 and older diagnosed with schizophrenia, articles addressing specific therapeutic interventions, and studies reporting quantifiable clinical outcomes. Exclusion criteria were: articles that did not differentiate the age group of participants, studies without original data or that did not include elderly patients, and publications that did not directly address schizophrenia treatment. Results: The results indicated that treatment for schizophrenia in the elderly frequently involved the use of atypical antipsychotics, which are preferred due to their more favorable side effect profile compared to typical antipsychotics. However, the effectiveness of these medications may be reduced in the elderly due to altered pharmacokinetics and increased risk of adverse effects. The combination of psychosocial therapy and support proved beneficial in improving treatment adherence and quality of life for patients. The need for individualized management and consideration of comorbidities were also highlighted. Conclusion: Treatment of schizophrenia in elderly patients requires a personalized approach that accounts for the complexities associated with aging. Medication choices should be made cautiously, prioritizing those with a lower risk of adverse effects. Additionally, integrating psychosocial strategies can significantly improve clinical outcomes and quality of life for these patients. Ongoing review of practices and guidelines is crucial for optimizing care and addressing the needs of this aging population.

Costs and affordability of psychotropic medicines for patients with schizophrenia in Nigeria

Background: Schizophrenia is a complex illness, in other words, requires certain costs to tackle the challenge. However, the use of psychotropic medicines is paramount for the disease management and the costs of these medications should be considered in the management especially in low- and – middle income countries. There is over-reliance on out-of-pocket payments among the individuals in these countries whereby a large number of the patients purchase the medicines out of pocket, and majority unable to afford the medicines for their illness. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the costs and affordability of psychotropic medicines for management of Schizophrenia. It specifically evaluated the financial burden of out-of-pocket payment to purchase medicines for patients with Schizophrenia in Nigeria. Method: The study was conducted in a Neuropsychiatric Hospital in Southeastern part of Nigeria using a retrospective, cross-sectional study of the costs of psychotropic medicines for adult patients with Schizophrenia that visited the hospital. Results: All the prescribed oral typical antipsychotics (except chlorpromazine 200mg/day and 300mg/day) gave the patients less than one day wage to pay for medicines, whereas, all the oral atypical antipsychotics gave the patients more than one day wage to pay for the psychotropic medicines. Conclusion: The atypical antipsychotics were unaffordable to the patients. We considered various factors as limitation and recommend interventions for reimbursements or make the psychotropic medicines free for the patients.

Inside the Hospitalization Voyage of Schizophrenia Care: A Single-Center Journey.

Schizophrenia poses significant challenges for individuals and caregivers, often leading to recurrent hospitalizations. Limited information on patients with schizophrenia and multiple hospitalizations in Romania is available in the scientific literature. Our study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with schizophrenia with multiple hospitalizations in a single center in Cluj-Napoca, analyzing if specific patterns exist between patients with two or more hospitalizations or between men and women. We conducted a retrospective study on patients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 10), hospitalized at the County Emergency Hospital of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, between 2018 and 2022. Data on demographics, somatic comorbidities, symptom severity using the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) or the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), antipsychotic medication, and adverse effects were collected. We evaluated 62 patients, aged from 23 to 57 years, with 157 hospitalizations (ranging from two to seven per patient). No familial history of schizophrenia (56.5%) or bipolar disorder (71%) was reported by most patients. Forty-eight patients were male, and 45 had two hospitalizations. Age, sex, living place and conditions, season of birth, and marital status were similar in patients with two or more than two hospitalizations (p-values > 0.10). Significant differences were observed between patients with two or more than two hospitalizations regarding smoking (63.3% vs. 79.1%, p-value = 0.0029) and symptoms of fear at admission (40.0% vs. 65.7%, p-value = 0.0015). We observed lower scores in the overall PANSS and BPRS scores at discharge compared to admission (p-values < 0.001), regardless of the group (two or more than two hospitalizations, men vs. women). Men and women showed differences in hospitalization stays (median 17.25 vs. 15 days, p-value < 0.001) and BPRS scores at admission (p-value = 0.012) and discharge (p-value = 0.016). Fewer First-Generation Antipsychotics were prescribed for those with two admissions, and nearly half reported adverse effects, notably tachycardia (29%), with similar occurrence within groups. Our results showed that the candidate for multiple hospitalizations is a male, with a mean age of 37 years, unmarried, and living with someone in urban settings, more likely a smoker who exhibits fear symptoms.