Over past several years restriction enzyme mapping has become an important tool in phylogenetic studies. Recently, several authors have pointed out that ribosomal DNA (rDNA) has several features that make it an attractive source of phylogenetic characters (Sytsma and Schaal, 1985; Hillis and Davis, 1986; Verma and Dutta, 1987). Because rDNA is a member of middle repetitive class of nuclear DNA, relatively high copy number makes both cloning rDNA and detecting it using autoradiography relatively easy. Unlike other types of repetitive DNA, rDNA is divided into two domains that evolve at quite different rates. The transcribed regions are highly conserved, presumably due to selective constraints. This sequence conservation makes rDNA clones easy to isolate, as even distantly related rDNA clones may be used to screen a library. The nontranscribed spacer (NTS) regions, on other hand, are apparently free to evolve, with some restrictions on length variation (Williams et al., 1987), but very little, if any, selection on nucleotide sequence. This allows investigation of both closely and distantly related taxa. The NTS, however, evolves in concert within a species, so that many copies of NTS within an individual and within a are similar to one another although being generally distinct from those of other (Coen et al., 1982a, b; Treco et al., 1982; Arnheim 1983). Therefore, for most systematic studies almost all of phylogenetically informative restriction site variation will be in NTS. The purpose of this note is to point out that same characteristics which make rDNA attractive may also introduce difficulties. First, even though it is widely accepted that rDNA genes are completely homogeneous within species, intra-species variation may still overlap inter-species variation. Second, even though some information about variation within NTS may be found using a heterologous probe, a homologous probe must be used to visualize rDNA during Southern blot hybridization. Otherwise, some information from NTS may be lost and, much worse, some misleading information may be produced. In their recent study of genus Rana, Hillis and Davis (1986) justify sampling only a single individual from most of their study taxa by stating that the rDNA of single individuals is usually characteristic of entire species (p. 1276). We agree that some gene families, such as rDNA, tend to evolve in concert and therefore are more homogeneous within than among (Dover, 1982). However, it strikes us as improbable that closely related can become differentially fixed for NTS restriction site patterns without exhibiting both within and between individual polymorphism during at least some stage of divergence process. We believe that dogma of rDNA gene family homogenization is overstated, as supported by several recent studies showing intraspecific variation. These data cover a diversity of taxa, including mice (Suzuki et al., 1986), higher primates (Wilson