Types Of Ownership Structures Research Articles

The Effect of Ownership Structure on the Going Concern Companies Listed in the Iraqi Stock Exchange

The ability of the economic unit to continue is one of the basic assumptions for preparing financial statements. Therefore, users of these statements need to have a clear image of the unit’s performance and financial situation and to ensure that there is no indicator warning of financial distress. For example, there is a conflict of interest between the unit’s shareholders on the one hand and the management on the other hand. Therefore, this research seeks to study the effect of the difference in the nature of the ownership structure on the going concern of economic units. The research is based on the hypothesis that each type of ownership structure has a negative impact on the going concern unit. The research selected five economic units listed on the Iraqi Stock Exchange from the service sector as a sample for the research. Data is collected for the period extending from 2011-2021. The research used the survey method to measure the ownership structure and applied a Kida Model to measure going concern. The most significant results of the research are a negative effect of institutional ownership, concentrated ownership, and management ownership on the going concern of the unit, In contrast, the effect is positive for both government ownership and family ownership, and foreign ownership has no effect. Paper type: Research paper

The Effect of Ownership Structure on the Going Concern Companies Listed in the Iraqi Stock Exchange

The ability of the economic unit to continue is one of the basic assumptions for preparing financial statements. Therefore, users of these statements need to have a clear image of the unit’s performance and financial situation and to ensure that there is no indicator warning of financial distress. For example, there is a conflict of interest between the unit’s shareholders on the one hand and the management on the other hand. Therefore, this research seeks to study the effect of the difference in the nature of the ownership structure on the going concern of economic units. The research is based on the hypothesis that each type of ownership structure has a negative impact on the going concern unit. The research selected five economic units listed on the Iraqi Stock Exchange from the service sector as a sample for the research. Data is collected for the period extending from 2011-2021. The research used the survey method to measure the ownership structure and applied a Kida Model to measure going concern. The most significant results of the research are a negative effect of institutional ownership, concentrated ownership, and management ownership on the going concern of the unit, In contrast, the effect is positive for both government ownership and family ownership, and foreign ownership has no effect. Paper type: Research paper

Sustainable futures: Toward institutionalizing green industrial policy

AbstractAlthough there have been substantial accomplishments in understanding environmental sustainability policy, there remains a paucity of research categorizing the mechanisms through which firm ownership architectures can be harnessed to advance green industrial policy (GIP). The purpose of this study is to examine how different types of ownership structures can be utilized as mechanisms for capitalizing on and championing GIP. By integrating the fragmented streams of research, this study advances a four‐cell typology of GIP‐firm ownership dimensions (privately‐owned enterprises (POEs)/state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) × intra‐country/inter‐country GIP), which sheds much‐needed light on the long‐term energy transition (ETs) pathway through institutional and industrial challenges. The analysis further enhances researchers' understanding of leveraging SOEs and POEs to neutralize uncertainties inherent in scaling up renewables and addressing the “pollution haven hypothesis.” Directions for future research pertaining to ETs are outlined.

Does ownership structure drive the effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality?

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of chief executive officer (CEO) overconfidence on earnings quality and the moderating role of ownership structure as a crucial corporate governance device.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation method to test our models on a sample of 335 French companies between 2009 and 2020, i.e. 4,020 observations.FindingsThe results show that CEO overconfidence negatively affects earnings quality. This result supports the predictions of behavioral finance theory and suggests that CEO overconfidence is a behavioral bias that affects the quality of earnings. The authors also examined the effect of different types of ownership structures on this relationship. The results show the significant role of controlling shareholders, owner-managers, families and institutional investors in mitigating the negative effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper has some limitations. First, other types of ownership structures could have been analyzed such as state ownership. Second, we ignored the role of the board of directors as an important governance mechanism in controlling overconfident CEOs’ actions.Practical implicationsCompanies should be aware of the potential risks associated with CEO overconfidence, which can compromise the faithful representation of earnings. This highlights the importance of effective monitoring and internal controls to detect and prevent such practices, which involve the role of ownership structure.Originality/valueThis paper addresses the effect of CEO overconfidence on earnings quality and provides new evidence on the role of different ownership structure types in shaping this relationship. Additionally, this paper sheds new light on how overconfident CEOs may behave in challenging times.

Who should select the external auditor in emerging economies? Role of institutional ownership and family ownership

Aim/purpose – This study reports the demand for Big 4 audits among institutional and family owners, the two dominant ownerships in the GCC countries. We conducted this in-depth study to gain an understanding of the type of firms, family-owned or institu- tional-owned firms that lead to choosing audit firms. Design/methodology/approach – This study employed a quantitative cross-country study by selecting a sample based on secondary data extracted from the Capital IQ data- -set from a panel of 1827 non-financial firms listed on the stock exchanges of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries from 2010 to 2018. The hypothesized effects of institutional ownership (IO) and family ownership (FO) on the selection of external auditors in these countries were examined using logit, probit, and heteroskedastic probit analysis. Findings – The study finds that institutional investors play a crucial role in influencing firms’ choice of auditors in the GCC. Family-owned firms tend to hire non-Big 4 firms when the owners actively monitor the firms’ financial transactions. In addition, the study finds that both domestic and foreign institutional investors have a significant positive effect on auditor selection, with domestic institutional investors having priority. These findings support the efforts of market authorities in the GCC to highlight the critical role of IO over FO in improving audit quality. Research implications/limitations – The results are highly relevant for shareholders, executives, institutional investors, regulators, and academics. They help them improve the growth of capital and audit markets by developing best practices, thereby helping achieve an optimal framework for auditor choice that matches higher audit quality. This study focuses on only two types of ownership structures (institution and family) despite the many options because of the extensive debates and discussions on the association between the studied ownership types and auditor choice. Originality/value/contribution – Study highlighted the role of institutional investors in GCC countries as one of the most attractive emerging economies in the Middle East. Since no research has been conducted on the role of institutional and family investors in selecting external auditors in GCC countries, this study has made a significant contribu- tion to the accounting and auditing literature. It mitigates the gap in the literature on emerging markets. The findings can provide policymakers with guidelines for including institutional investors and FO in GCC countries to ensure high-quality audits. Keywords: institutional ownership (IO), family ownership (FO), auditor choice, Gulf Cooperation Council, emerging economies. JEL Classification: G23, G32, D10, M42.

The effect of ownership structure on tax avoidance with audit quality as a moderating variable: evidence from the ailing economics

Purpose The purpose of this study is to shed light on the relationships between the different types of ownership structure and tax avoidance activities and examine the moderating effect of audit quality. Design/methodology/approach This study used secondary data from the listed companies in Amman Stock Exchange (2009–2020). To obtain additional robust findings, this study used various proxies for measuring tax avoidance (effective tax rate [ETR] and cash flow effective tax rate [CFETR]). Findings Relying on various proxies for tax avoidance, the results reveal that family and managerial ownership lead to exacerbating tax avoidance activities. Although institutional and board ownership have a positive impact on ETR and CFETR, which indicate that these type of ownership have a negative impact on tax avoidance. Audit quality also has a significant role in moderating the ownership structure–tax avoidance relationships. Besides, the results reveal that audit firm size is not merely symbolic words, but it contributes to reducing and restricting tax aggressiveness. Research limitations/implications This study has policy implications related to the policymakers in creating future tax policies to minimize and avoid tax avoidance activities. Results of this study can be used to improve awareness among the various owners and to reduce the tax avoidance practices in the developing countries. It also determines a good agenda for research in the relationships between ownership identities, audit quality and tax avoidance, which also can be used to encourage and guide future studies. Originality/value This research extends the existing literature by examining both the direct and indirect influence of ownership structure on tax avoidance in Jordanian firms by including audit quality as a moderating variable. This is a pioneering and unique study examining the joint influence of the different forms of ownership on tax avoidance. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first of its kind that examines the interaction influences between the various identities of ownership and audit quality on the tax avoidance activities in the Jordanian context.

Effect of Ownership Structure on Dividend Policy of Listed Firms at the Nairobi Securities Exchange

Ownership structure leads to agency problems since majority shareholders have high levels of incentives hence, they monitor the actions of the management and influence decisions. There has been a growing debate on whether ownership structure impacts on management decisions especially dividend policy decisions. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ownership on dividend pay-out of listed firms at Nairobi Securities Exchange. The study employed correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis in establishing relationship between types of ownership structures and dividend pay-out. This research was anchored by agency theory and utilized a cross-sectional descriptive research design. The population comprised of 63 listed firms listed in the ten-year Period under consideration. Diagnostic tests and descriptive statistics were carried out afterwards inferential statistics: correlation analysis and regression analysis were applied in hypothesis testing. The study found that an increase in concentration of Managerial Ownership and Foreign Ownership caused an increase in dividend pay-out because cash dividends tend to be higher where the managerial and foreign ownership presence in the board of directors is higher. In addition, state ownership and institutional ownership caused a caused a decrease in dividend pay-out because the state and Institutional Owners prefer cash retention as opposed to dividend distribution in the company.

State Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Investigation on Nigerian Data

Purpose: The paper examines the central issue underpinning the growing international literature and arguments that different ownership types have varying implications for a firm’s CSR engagement. It compliments evolving studies by looking at the effect of state ownership and other types of ownership structures on CSR, specifically in the Nigerian industry. It is argued that the impact of ownership structure on corporate decisions to allocate resources to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has assumed renewed significance in the burgeoning literature of developing economies, given the exigency for corporate executives to allocate firm specific resources to other social objectives that may detract from profit maximization.
 Methodology: This paper differs markedly from the methodologies of previous studies which used composite CSR indices. It deconstructs CSR expenditure into five categories – public goods, socially desirable goods, corporate philanthropy, employee relations and environmental conservation – and estimates the effects of government, foreign and institutional ownership on CSR variables controlling for such factors as firm size, return on assets and capital intensity. Using new data on listed Nigerian firms, this paper carries out its empirical investigation with panel data estimation in order to deal with heterogeneity and endogeneity issues.
 Findings: The findings of this paper indicate that different ownership structures have varying implications for the five forms of CSR investigated in this study. It reveals that government ownership has no significant effect on CSR expenditure on public goods, corporate philanthropy and environmental conservation. However, it finds that government ownership also significantly influences CSR expenditure on socially desirable goods and employee relations.
 Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy:Theoretically, this paper extends the trajectory of CSR discourse to include an elaborate investigation of the impact of ownership structures on CSR practices in all the major sectors of Nigerian economy.The paper argues that its empirical results have several policy implications for good corporate governance practices in Nigeria and other emerging economies. This paper suggests the need to institute incentives schemes and regulatory constraints that would compel government, foreign and institutional ownership to align their incentives with some forms of CSR practices.

Board influence on accruals management and the role of ownership structure: Evidence from Bangladesh

The main purpose of this study is to explore the association between accruals management (AM) and board attributes. Additionally, the study investigates the moderating role of ownership structures. In order to perform the study, five years of data (2016–2020) for 159 firms listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) have been considered, consisting of 759 firm-year observations. Agency theory that governs the relationship between the principal and the agent has been applied here. We have used STATA software with the random effects GLS model to run the regression on the balanced panel data. The results of the analysis show that, while board size and board independence have significant positive relation with AM, gender diversity, institutional ownership and family ownership show a significant negative association with AM. The analysis of moderating variables shows that foreign ownership has a significant negative impact on the association between board expertise and AM, and family ownership has a significant negative impact on board independence and AM. These findings indicate that the type of ownership structure may be useful in attaining the objectives of the board in Bangladesh. The findings of the study will be relevant for the regulatory authorities in Bangladesh in controlling and implementing new guidelines related to corporate governance.

The Impact of Ownership Structure on Bank Profitability and the Diversity of Products: new Evidence from Iraqi Banks

Purpose: The objective of this study was to identify the impact of the ownership structure on the profitability and the diversity of banking products in commercial banks listed on the Iraq Stock Exchange. Theoretical framework: Investigating the factors affecting bank performance is an important debate these days. The literature refers to the importance of the ownership structure in deriving various types of performance in companies. However, there is still much to investigate and learn about the sensitivity of the performance of banks to various types of ownership structures. Design/methodology/approach: Using a linear regression model, we analyzed the relationships between ownership structures and the company’s profitability, as well as product diversity for the period span from 2011 to 2020. We focused our investigation on commercial banks listed on the Iraq Stock Exchange. Findings: The empirical findings show that the ownership structure has a mixed effect on Iraqi bank profitability measured by return on assets, return on equity, and Q-Tobin ratio. Nevertheless, the result confirm the significant influence of the ownership structure on the diversity of banking products. Research, Practical & Social implications: The results indicate that Iraqi banks’ regulators and supervisors should give more attention to the sensitivity of banks’ performance and diversity of the products to the effect of ownership structure. Originality/value: This study is among the first to investigate the relationships between ownership structure measured by the concentration of ownership, institutional ownership, and administrative ownership on the Iraqi commercial banks’ performance, whether financial or non-financial such as the bank's profitability and diversification of its products.

Is Relationship between Carbon Emissions and Innovation Nonlinear? Evidence from OECD countries

Our paper fills a gap in the literature on the relationship between innovation, carbon emissions, ownership structure, and institutional framework quality. We test the linear and nonlinear relationships between research and development (R&D) expenditures and carbon emissions by considering ownership structure types and institutional setting variables. We use parametric and semiparametric regressions, on a sample of 32 member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), over the period 2015–2020. Our parametric results confirm the inverted U-shaped relationship found in previous research, between innovation and carbon emissions, as well as the significantly positive effect of an institutional presence in ensuring an energy transition. Moreover, semiparametric regressions suggest, first, that there are many peaks, which confirms the dual relationship between the variables. Second, they highlight a positive association between foreign investors and carbon emissions. Third, the introduction of the institutional quality variable confirms an inverted u-shaped relationship between carbon emissions and innovation. Globally, our study raises awareness among both public authorities and investors of the challenges of environmental degradation and its adverse effects on the climate.

Multiple large shareholders and auditor choice: evidence from China

PurposeThis study aims to examine whether a firm's demand for high-quality auditors is influenced by multiple large shareholders (MLS). As one type of ownership structure, MLS have gained popularity in China recently and have different types of large shareholders, including large institutional shareholder, large foreign shareholder and large state shareholder. The authors also examine whether different types of MLS have heterogeneous impacts on appointing high-quality auditors.Design/methodology/approachWith a sample of 27,131 firm-year observations from Chinese public companies from 2003 to 2018, the authors use multivariate regressions to examine the effect of MLS on auditor choice. Heckman two-stage analysis, a firm fixed effects model, propensity score matching and difference-in-differences test are used as robustness checks.FindingsThis paper finds that the presence and power of MLS increase the likelihood of appointing high-quality auditors. With regard to the types of MLS, large institutional shareholders and foreign shareholders have significant positive effects on appointing high-quality auditors, while the presence of state-owned large shareholders has no effect on auditor choice. Further analyses reveal that the positive effect of MLS on high-quality auditor choice is more pronounced in firms with severe agency problems and information asymmetry. Taken together, these results suggest that MLS play a monitoring role by demanding high-quality auditors.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the literature on the determinants of auditor choice. While prior studies primarily focus on the impact of concentrated ownership structure, corporate governance and the pressure from stakeholders on auditor choice, this paper complements the literature by providing evidence from the heterogeneous effects of different types MLS. This paper also extends the literature on the consequences of MLS from the perspective of auditor choice.

Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change related risks

In the face of global systemic risks brought about by climate change, government organizations, civil societies, and enterprises globally have begun standardizing and implementing relevant contingency measures to mitigate or adapt to climate change. For example, Take SDG 13 climate action or implement various strategies for low-carbon transformation. In addition to responding to climate change commitments, these major changes have also boosted the rating scores of their ESG performance indicators, which inevitably have a certain degree of impact on their financial performance. Using the ESG performance indicators and financial data of 100 manufacturing firms worldwide from 2005 to 2020, this study constructs a multilevel quadratic growth model to analyze and investigate the effects of different types of ownership structure as well as disclosure of climate change-related risks and opportunities (CCR risks) on ESG and financial performance indicators among manufacturing industry firms. The findings of this study showed that different ownership structures, the degree of disclosure of climate change-related risks and opportunities (CCR risks), and the number of environmental performance indicators had no multiplicative effect on the financial performance of manufacturing companies. Instead, there was a positive, but negatively moderating, effect on financial performance. When the investigated enterprises attached higher importance to climate change issues and thus strengthened investments in, and implementation of, corresponding environmental performance indicators, the positive impact of environmental performance on financial performance gradually diminished to the point of negative impact, thereby affecting companies' operating profits. This was especially the case for private enterprises. However, disclosure of climate change-related risks and opportunities has a significant positive effect on financial performance among such firms. In addition, private firms and social performance indicators had a negative, but positively moderating, effect on financial performance. This meant that, upon investigation, the private enterprises made more effort to invest in and implement social performance indicators, and the impact on financial performance gradually increased and eventually shifted from negative to positive. Environmental performance indicators and financial performance were generally found to exhibit a distinctly positive effect.In summary, the results of this study can be used as a reference for firm managers to enhance their decision-making related to actions, strategies, and planning in response to climate change-related risks and opportunities under the framework of ESG performance indicators.

Ownership Structure On Tax Avoidance: Empirical Study On Manufacturing Companies

The purpose of this study aims to examine the effect of ownership structure as measured by institutional and public managerial ownership on tax avoidance. The population of this study are manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2019. The sampling technique uses a purposive sample which is a sampling method with criteria such as manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2019 and companies that present annual reports during 2019. The results show that managerial ownership structure affects tax avoidance, while public ownership structure and institutional ownership structure does not affect tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2019. These results indicate that companies owned by managers are more likely to carry out tax avoidance because managers have full power to prepare financial statements in accordance with their wishes compared to institutional and public ownership. This research contributes to providing information to stakeholders about which type of ownership structure is more likely to avoid tax.

Company Ownership Structure, Legal Compliance and the Probability of Winning an Employment Lawsuit in China

Abstract This paper investigates empirically whether firm ownership structures contribute to varying levels of legal compliance, which ultimately influence the likelihood of winning a lawsuit. I hypothesize that private companies are more likely to lose employment lawsuits because the rule of law within the company is rarely established. Using collected 2756 employment judgments decided by district courts in Beijing between 2014 and 2018, I test this hypothesis against three other types of ownership structures in China: state-owned enterprises, wholly foreign-funded companies, and partly foreign-funded companies. The statistical result confirms that private companies are more likely to lose cases, thus supporting the proposed hypothesis. In addition, the company’s scale and the company’s life span also have a significant influence on the employment lawsuit result.

Ownership Structure and Financial Performance of Listed Firms in Kenya: Mediation Role of Corporate Diversification

Purpose: The study aimed at examining the mediating role of corporate diversification between ownership structure and financial performance of listed firms in Kenya. Methodology/Approach/Design: As guided by explanatory research design, 65 listed firms from 2003 to 2017 were targeted. However, panel data of 35 firms were considered after excluding suspended and delisted as far as the study period is concerned. Results: The panel regression analysis finding indicated that corporate diversification positively and significantly mediated between institutional ownership and financial performance (β = .005, p-value = .000). Furthermore, there was a negative but statistically significant mediation effect of corporate diversification between foreign ownership and financial performance (β = -.0019, p-value = .023). These mediation effects existed despite the direct effect between institutional and as well foreign ownership and financial performance being statistically insignificant. Practical Implications: The study, therefore, suggested to the management of listed firms to ensure proper implementation of corporate diversification as it transmits the effect of ownership structure on financial performance. More importantly, policymakers are suggested to streamline taxation of foreign investors, tackle malpractices in the firm leading to embezzlement of investor funds. Future studies need to enlarge the scope to incorporate unlisted firms as well as firms listed in different stock exchanges in East Africa. Other types of ownership structure as managerial, family and state need to be analyzed. In addition, other forms and measures of corporate diversification could be investigated by future researchers. Originality/Value: To attain the main objective, the study used panel regression analysis and path diagrams to examine the effect of ownership structure on financial performance via corporate diversification.

Are There Limits to Diversification in Emerging Economies? Distinguishing between Firm‐Level and Business Group Strategies

AbstractThe viability of unrelated diversification as a strategy in emerging economies is an unresolved puzzle. Because business groups dominate the landscape in these economies, and are known to diversify either by expanding the scope of existing affiliate firms and/or setting up new firms, we argue that it is important to make a distinction between firm‐level and business group‐level diversification. The results of our study covering the 15‐year period following India’s economic liberalization confirm our thesis. Whereas all firms, including business group affiliates, reduced unrelated scope to negotiate product and capital market pressures, business groups took advantage of the opportunity‐rich, post‐reform environment to enter into new unrelated businesses by setting up new affiliates. Our findings echo suggestions that as institutions strengthen, the locus of unrelated diversification moves away from managers of public corporations to entities with different types of ownership structures. We present the business group as one such ownership structure.

Ownership structure’s effect on financial performance: An empirical analysis of Jordanian listed firms

This study aims to examine the impact of the ownership structure on firm performance in the Jordan. This study employed the multiple-regression model and fixed regression effect to analyse the data. The sample included all Jordanian first market firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE) from 2012 to 2018. The paper’s findings reveal a positive and significant relationship between institutional ownership and both accounting measure Return on Assets (ROA) and market measure Tobin’s Q (TQ). Other ownership structure types, such as concentration of ownership, also affect ROA and TQ. While managerial ownership shows a negative relationship with ROA, but there is no association with TQ. This study has broad and comprehensive practical implications that are good for policymakers. On the one hand, it adds to the debate on agency theory from the ownership structure and firm’s performance relationship. On the other hand, it helps the Jordanian Government formulate policies and regulations to strengthen corporate governance (CG), which increases the interests of all stakeholders in the Jordanian market.

Political Connection, Ownership Structures and Tax Aggressiveness: The Case of Indonesia

<p><em>The main </em><em>purpose</em><em> of this research is to examine the influences of political connection and ownership structures towards the tax aggressiveness</em><em> in Indonesian companies</em><em>. This research is a quantitative research and the </em><em>samples</em><em> consist of the companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2016. Furthermore, the data used in this research is secondary data obtained from the companies’ financial reports and annual reports. The tax aggressiveness </em><em>is</em><em> measured with Book Tax Differences (BTD) proxy. The result of this research shows that political connection</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>government ownership, and foreign ownership give negative significant effects towards tax aggressiveness, while institutional ownership give no significant effect towards tax aggressiveness. The limitation of this research is the using of 2-year samples only that consist of companies in various sectors. In addition, the companies that are classified in a particular sector, are given different tax treatment by Directorate General of Taxes.</em><em> </em><em>This research can be beneficial for making taxation regulation in the future. This research is also expected to be the supporting literature for the next research for the scholars in the taxation and accounting field related to the company’ tax aggressiveness. This research extends the previous research by adding some type of ownership structure in analyzing factors that affect tax aggressiveness in Indonesia. The ownership structure consists of government ownership, foreign ownership, and institutional ownership. Furthermore, political connections in this study were analyzed from connections through boards of directors and commissioners.</em><em></em></p>

Corporate Governance and Agency Cost: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam

This study examines the impact of corporate governance, reflecting a wide spectrum of board characteristics and ownership structure on agency costs in 281 listed companies on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HOSE) in Vietnam in the period 2013–2018. For this purpose, three board characteristics were chosen: (1) the size of board of directors, (2) equilibrium between non-executive and executive members of the board of directors, (3) the CEO chair duality and three types of ownership structures were chosen: (1) management ownership, (2) government ownership, (3) foreign ownership. An inverse proxy of agency costs is used: asset utilization ratio (asset turnover), which reflects the managerial efficiency. The research methodology includes three statistical approaches: Ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects model (FEM) and random effects model (REM) are considered to employ to address econometric issues and to improve the accuracy of the regression coefficients. The results can create effective corporate governance mechanisms in controlling the managerial opportunistic behavior to lower agency conflicts, and hence lower agency costs.