Types Of Long-term Care Facilities Research Articles

Acoustic characteristics of bedrooms in two types of long-term care facilities in China

The aim of this study was to quantitatively determine the acoustic characteristics of bedrooms in two types of long-term care facilities in China. Objective acoustic conditions, including noise levels and reverberation times, were measured through a series of acoustic measurements in twelve bedrooms in two nursing homes and three adult care homes in Kunming city, China. The impacts of noise and sound preferences were evaluated through a questionnaire survey administered to residents and nursing staff. In terms of the sound field, the background noise levels in most measured bedrooms exceeded the WHO's recommended value (30 dBA) by approximately 10–15 dBA. Compared to those in adult care homes, the noise levels in nursing homes were approximately 5–7 dBA higher during the daytime and 2–3 dBA higher during the nighttime due to frequent nursing activities. Moreover, noise levels were 5–15 dBA higher in roadside bedrooms. The reverberation time of five bedrooms reached 0.8 s at low frequency (125 Hz) due to their large space and absence of sound-absorbing materials. The questionnaire showed that noise sources were mainly perceived as coming from corridors and out-of-windows by residents and nursing staff. Traffic noise, residents' yelling in pain (just in nursing homes) and footsteps were considered the most noticeable noises, which may have had negative effects on participants' sleep quality, health, and emotional state. Moreover, the residents in roadside bedrooms reported that noise had a greater impact on their sleep (p < 0.01). Compared to artificial and mechanical sounds, participants preferred nature sounds, such as streams and birds, which were significantly (p < 0.01) positively correlated with age.

Healthcare-Associated Infections and Prevention Programs in General Nursing versus Residential Homes-Results of the Point Prevalence Survey in Polish Long-Term Care Facilities.

Background and Objectives: The number of residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is expected to increase. Determining the epidemiological situation in the context of organizational conditions is therefore extremely important for planning the necessary future activities in the field of infection prevention. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence rates in Polish nursing vs. residential homes, in the context of the medical and functional burdens of residents and the organizational conditions of both types of units. Material and Methods: the data that were analyzed came from a point prevalence survey of infections and antibiotic consumption in LTCFs, conducted in accordance with the HALT-3 protocol in Poland in 2017, between April and June. Results: This study included a total of 2313 residents in 24 LTCFs. The most common risk factors for infections in the study population were urinary and fecal incontinence (77.0%), impaired mobility (the patient was in a wheelchair or lying down) (68.7%), and impaired spatial and temporal orientation (52.5%). The median prevalence in nursing homes (NHs) was 3.2% and that in residential homes (RHs) was 0.7%, but without statistical significance. The median for the entire group was 2.6%. A total of 93 healthcare-related infections were detected in 91 residents. The most frequently reported forms of infections were urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, and skin infections. A statistically significant positive correlation was found only between the percentage of residents with pressure ulcers and other wounds and the incidence of gastrointestinal infections (correlation coefficient = 0.413, p < 0.05). Infection prevention and control measures were implemented mainly in nursing homes, and in residential homes, only hand hygiene procedures were commonly available. Conclusions: For the two types of LTCFs, the epidemiological situation in terms of nosocomial infections is diverse. Consequently, both types of facilities require different approaches to infection control and prevention and outcomes analysis.

사회복지사의 임파워먼트가 직무소진에 미치는 영향: 노인장기요양기관의 시설유형에 따른 비교를 중심으로

사회복지사의 임파워먼트가 직무소진에 미치는 영향: 노인장기요양기관의 시설유형에 따른 비교를 중심으로

Preference of caregivers on residential care homes for older persons with versus without communication problems: a discrete choice experiment

BackgroundA residential care service voucher scheme has been introduced to expand the capacity and enhance choice of public-funded long-term care (LTC) in Hong Kong, enabling users to have greater choices over the types of LTC facilities. Older persons with communication problems have difficulties in understanding the care options available to them and expressing their preferences to care homes and daily service delivery, therefore hindering their ability to exercise control and choice. Thus, they may have different needs and preferences for the facilities than others due to their conditions. This study therefore aimed to investigate their preference for care homes in comparison with those without communication problems.MethodsA discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit preference for six attributes derived from prior studies. The family caregivers of a random sample of older voucher holders were invited to undertake face-to-face interview. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the attributes was estimated for those with or without communication problems separately.ResultsTwo hundred eighty-three caregivers provided valid responses (74% response rate). Caregivers of those with communication problem preferred facilities operated by non-governmental organizations (WTP=HK$1777.4) and shorter travelling time (WTP=HK$1502.5 for <=0.5 hours), while those without the problem had greater preference for fewer roommates (WTP=HK$3048.1 for single room) and extra healthcare professionals (WTP=HK$1765.5). Heterogenous WTPs were identified from those with different income, marital status and caregivers’ age.ConclusionsThe reputation, greater space and staff, and proximity/familiarity of the facilities were important for those with communication problems. To help meet these preferences, the facilities could establish collaborations with local community-based service providers and build their own outreach team to familiarize themselves with older persons. Additionally, household income and informal support availability should be considered for care planning.

A Typology of COVID-19 Data Gaps and Noise From Long-Term Care Facilities: Approximating the True Numbers.

Although there is agreement that COVID-19 has had devastating impacts in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), estimates of cases and deaths have varied widely with little attention to the causes of this variation. We developed a typology of data vulnerabilities and a strategy for approximating the true total of COVID-19 cases and deaths in LTCFs. Based on iterative qualitative consensus, we categorized LTCF reporting vulnerabilities and their potential impacts on accuracy. Concurrently, we compiled one dataset based on LTCF self-reports and one based on confirmatory matching with California’s COVID-19 databases, including death certificates. Through March 2021, Alameda County LTCFs reported 6663 COVID-19 cases and 481 deaths. In contrast, our confirmatory matching file includes 5010 cases and 594 deaths, corresponding to 25% fewer cases but 23% more deaths. We argue that the higher (self-report) case total approximates the lower bound of true COVID-19 cases, and the higher (confirmed match) death total approximates the lower bound of true COVID-19 deaths, both of which are higher than state and federal counts. LTCFs other than nursing facilities accounted for 35% of cases and 29% of deaths. Improving the accuracy of COVID-19 figures, particularly across types of LTCFs, would better inform interventions for these vulnerable populations.

Quality of Life of Elderly People Living in Different Types of Long-term Care Facilities

Population aging is a worldwide occurrence that has become urgent in developing countries. Quality of life can be measured to identify functional capacity and determine the degree of impact on quality of life exerted on an individual. This study aimed to measure the quality of life of elderly people who have been living in different long-term care facilities for the elderly. Therefore, this research was developed with a qualitative and descriptive approach. Data were obtained from medical records and interviews, and were analyzed in R language interpreter software on the Ubuntu Linux operating system. Seventy-nine elderly people participated in the study. Eleven lived in Home Marista, and 68 lived in Home Jesus Maria José. A socioeconomic questionnaire was used to collect data on the socioeconomic characteristics of the participants. The Mini-Mental State Exam was used to measure degree of cognition. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire was used to measure quality of life. The present study suggests that the results found can clarify the individual vulnerability of the elderly in the age group studied regardless of the type of residence. Despite the discrepancy found regarding the care provided at the long-term care facilities, the scores, obtained with the quality of life assessment, did not show significant differences.

The revised index for social engagement (RISE) in long-term care facilities: reliability and validity in Japan.

This study aimed to establish the validity and reliability of a revised index for social engagement (RISE) in the Japanese context. We analysed the data of 1377 participants over 65 years of age who had been admitted to two types of long-term care facilities (LTCF) in Japan: four health facilities for older adults and eight nursing homes. Resident level data based on the Japanese version of the interRAI assessment instrument were collected from 623 residents in the former and 754 in the latter. From these data, we calculated RISE by adding six dichotomous items on social engagement in the assessment form. Factorial validity was evaluated by exploratory factorial analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity by the correlation between average activity time and the RISE score, and discriminant validity by the correlation between cognitive levels and the RISE scores. Lastly, we assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha. We identified a two-factor model in the exploratory factorial analysis with a factor loading >0.40, except for one RISE item. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the two-factor model had appropriate model fits. The correlation between time involved in activities and the RISE score was r=0.45, while the correlation between cognitive function and the RISE score was r=-0.32. The convergent and discriminant validities supported the use of Japanese LTCF. Cronbach's alpha ranged 0.70-0.72. Although further revision may be needed to improve factorial validity, RISE is reliable and valid for assessing social engagement of older adults admitted to LTCF in Japan. By using the Japanese version of RISE, the positive aspects of social functioning can be appropriately assessed and provide more evidence for improving the quality of care in LTCF.

Characterization of COVID-19 in Assisted Living Facilities - 39 States, October 2020.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the vulnerability of residents and staff members in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) (1). Although skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) certified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have federal COVID-19 reporting requirements, national surveillance data are less readily available for other types of LTCFs, such as assisted living facilities (ALFs) and those providing similar residential care. However, many state and territorial health departments publicly report COVID-19 surveillance data across various types of LTCFs. These data were systematically retrieved from health department websites to characterize COVID-19 cases and deaths in ALF residents and staff members. Limited ALF COVID-19 data were available for 39 states, although reporting varied. By October 15, 2020, among 28,623 ALFs, 6,440 (22%) had at least one COVID-19 case among residents or staff members. Among the states with available data, the proportion of COVID-19 cases that were fatal was 21.2% for ALF residents, 0.3% for ALF staff members, and 2.5% overall for the general population of these states. To prevent the introduction and spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in their facilities, ALFs should 1) identify a point of contact at the local health department; 2) educate residents, families, and staff members about COVID-19; 3) have a plan for visitor and staff member restrictions; 4) encourage social (physical) distancing and the use of masks, as appropriate; 5) implement recommended infection prevention and control practices and provide access to supplies; 6) rapidly identify and properly respond to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases in residents and staff members; and 7) conduct surveillance of COVID-19 cases and deaths, facility staffing, and supply information (2).

Ambulance use for low-acuity conditions by long-term care facilities for older adults

Increased ambulance calls affect the timely transportation of patients. Recently, ambulance uses from long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for older adults has been increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent LTCFs used ambulances for low-acuity conditions. Ambulance records from the fire department of Misato City were used. The participants were patients aged 65years or older transported from all types of LTCFs (including public nursing homes, geriatric health services facilities, private nursing homes, and group homes) and homes. The proportions of ambulance use for low-acuity conditions and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and compared by time (daytime and night-time) and day (weekdays and holidays) of ambulance use for each type of residence. Of 12,494 participants, 1336 (11%) were transported from LTCFs, and 326 (2.6%) for low-acuity conditions. Of 326 patients with low-acuity conditions, 69% were transported from LTCFs. The proportion of low-acuity conditions was 17% among those transported from LTCFs, while it was only 1% among those from homes. The proportion of low-acuity conditions was significantly greater during night-time than daytime among those from public nursing homes, geriatric health services facilities, and group homes, while this proportion was greater on weekdays than holidays among those from geriatric health services facilities. This study found a large number of instances of ambulance use for low-acuity conditions by LTCFs. To reduce unnecessary ambulance use for low-acuity conditions efficiently, LTCFs should be assisted in making proper assessments of both patients' conditions and appropriate ambulance use.

Resident Challenges With Pain and Functional Limitations in Chinese Residential Care Facilities

Pain and functional limitations can severely impede older adults' quality of life. In Chinese residential care facilities, limited research suggests that residents potentially have significant unmet care needs with pain and related functional limitations. Therefore, we aimed to explore residents' challenges and self-management strategies in these two areas. This knowledge is essential to developing care interventions to improve quality of care and quality of life in Chinese residential care facilities. We conducted semi-structured open-ended interviews with residents (n = 21) in two facilities in eastern and central China and assessed their pain and functional status using self-report measures from Minimum Data Set 3.0. We applied descriptive statistics to the self-reported data and analyzed the interview data using thematic analysis by drawing on the Adaptive Leadership Framework. This framework proposes that individuals living with chronic conditions need to engage in work to address their complex health concerns and that they need support from the environment to facilitate problem-solving. Residents described significant unmet care needs with pain and functional limitations. To address these care needs, they adopted a substantial number of self-management strategies. While doing so, they faced significant barriers, including service gaps and inadequate direct care. The findings suggest further research to explore long-term care policy change that is needed to provide comprehensive health and medical services and adequate direct care in these facilities. The importance of establishing various types of long-term care facilities is also highlighted.

A Resident’s Right to Appeal a Facility-Initiated Discharge

A Resident’s Right to Appeal a Facility-Initiated Discharge

A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture.

To test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale among staff in long-term care facilities. The Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale is a standard tool for safety culture assessment in nursing homes. Extending its application to different types of long-term care facilities and varied ethnic populations is worth pursuing. A national random survey. A total of 306 managers and staff completed the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale among 30 long-term care facilities in Taiwan. Content validity and construct validity were tested by content validity index (CVI) and principal axis factor analysis (PAF) with Promax rotation. Concurrent validity was tested through correlations between the scale and two overall rating items. Reliability was computed by intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficients. Statistical analyses such as descriptive, Pearson's and Spearman's rho correlations and PAF were completed. Scale-level and item-level CVIs (0.91-0.98) of the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale were satisfactory. Four-factor construct and merged item composition differed from the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale, and it accounted for 53% of variance. Concurrent validity was evident by existing positive correlations between the scale and two overall ratings of resident safety. Cronbach's α coefficients of the subscales and the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale ranged from .76-.94. The Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale identified essential dimensions to reflect the important features of a patient safety culture in long-term care facilities. The researchers introduced the Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture for safety culture assessment in long-term care facilities, but further testing of the reliability of the scale in a large Chinese sample and in different long-term care facilities was recommended. The Chinese version of the Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture scale was developed to increase the users' intention towards safety culture assessment. It can identify areas for improvement, understand safety culture changes over time and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

The Role of the ‧SNFologist' in Today's Transitional Care

The Role of the ‧SNFologist' in Today's Transitional Care

Factors Affecting Long-term Care Facility Managers′ Perceived Difficulties in Organizational Space Planning

This study examines the typology of the five factors affecting the space planning of long-term care (LTC) facilities in Taiwan to understand how they affect facility managers′ perceived difficulty in engaging in space planning. Data were collected through questionnaires and nonlinear canonical correlation analysis (OVERALS) was used for data analysis. The results reveal that managers of leased LTC facilities experience greater difficulty in space planning than managers of facilities designed specifically for LTC use. The results also suggest that specifications and guidelines regarding space design and planning should be provided for various types of LTC facilities.

Voting by Senior Citizens in Long-Term Care Facilities

This article investigates voting among residents of nursing homes and assisted living facilities. We conducted a survey of Virginia long-term care facilities focused on voting in the 2006 midterm elections. The study reveals, first, that there are systematic differences in the voting experience of senior citizens who reside in nursing homes as compared with assisted living facilities. Second, we find considerable variance in how much attention is given to registration and voting by both types of long-term care facilities and in how much help residents receive to enable them to vote. Third and most important, facility policies and practices designed to facilitate registration and voting appear to increase voter turnout. Finally, it appears that many long-term care facilities may be disenfranchising residents who want to vote by incorrectly assuming that they lack the necessary capacity to do so. Overall, the study suggests that many seniors in long-term care facilities who are eligible to vote do not have a meaningful opportunity to do so.

Approach to fever and infection in the nursing home.

To summarize current information on the scope, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach, and general management of infectious diseases in nursing home residents, as well as the specific treatment of common infections occurring in the nursing home setting. Survey and literature review of the diagnostic and therapeutic problems of nursing home residents with infections. Older persons residing in nursing homes as well as other types of long-term care facilities are at increased risk for infections. Moreover, infection is the most frequent reason for patients to be transferred from nursing homes to an acute-care facility. The most common infections that are acquired in nursing homes are urinary tract infection (cystitis pyelonephritis), respiratory infections (pneumonia, bronchitis), and skin/soft tissue infections (infected pressure ulcers, cellulitis). Most serious infections in this setting are caused by bacteria; however, influenza and other respiratory viruses as well as herpes zoster may cause significant morbidity in older nursing home residents. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects nursing home residents at a higher rate than it infects older community dwellers. Infections in older nursing home residents may manifest clinically, with atypical symptoms and signs, including the absence of fever. Rapid diagnostic evaluation and early therapeutic intervention are essential for minimizing the high mortality and morbidity associated with infections in this older population; most nursing home residents with serious infections should be considered for hospitalization.