Type Of Tear Research Articles

A Comparative study of anterior cruciate ligament repair effectiveness in proximal ACL tears

Background. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a gold standard surgical option for ACL tears. Another go-to method is primary ACL repair. The latter has its own limitations such as small range of indications – proximal tears only, which constitute a significant portion of ACL injuries. Although the primary repair has been known for a long time and is still developing, recent publications show conflicting outcomes. Aim of study was to compare functional outcomes of patients with ACL reconstruction and primary repair. Methods. During 2020-2023 we conducted randomized prospective multicenter control comparative study which included 170 patients with ACL tear types A, B, E according to Gächter classification, with injuries no older than 3 months. Patients were divided into two groups: 1st group – primary repair of ACL, 2nd group – ACL reconstruction. Knee function was assessed before surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24 months after the treatment using the IKDC 2000 and Lyshlom Knee Score. Results. Type E ACL injury prevailed in the sample. The most common associated injury in both cohorts was medial meniscus tear (39,3±0,05% and 45,3±0,05%). 15,5±0,04% patients with primary repair had chondrolabral defects, reconstruction group – 10,5±0,03%. 46,03±0,06% of 2nd and 25,35±0,05% of 1st group (p0,05) received pain relief therapy in the form of opioid analgesics. The proportion of patients requiring reoperation for ACL injury in 1st group was 3,5%, in 2nd group – 1,2%. Both groups had a statistically significant increase in functional outcomes at 3, 6, 12 months (p0,05). The difference of knee function between groups was not statistically significant (p0,05). Conclusion. Primary ACL repair still retains a large number of limitations: it cannot and should not replace ACL reconstruction, but should be used with strict adherence to the indications and surgical technique to show comparable functional outcomes.

Correlations Between Different Types of Posterior Superior Rotator Cuff Tears and Myoarchitecture: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Correlations Between Different Types of Posterior Superior Rotator Cuff Tears and Myoarchitecture: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Primary ACL repair in a selected patient cohort: A prospective single cohort study

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common knee injuries, particularly in physically active individuals. While ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) is the standard treatment, it has notable limitations. Recent interest in primary ACL repair offers a potential alternative, especially for specific tear types and patient demographics. PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of primary ACL repair in a selected patient cohort with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on the survival of the procedure, functional outcomes, and factors influencing success rates. MethodsThis prospective single cohort study included 61 patients who underwent primary ACL repair between June 2016 and June 2022. Patients were 50 years or younger, with recent ACL injuries and no previous knee surgeries or multiligament injuries. The primary outcomes were the survival of the repair beyond two years, measured by revision rates, and functional outcomes assessed using the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and Lachmeter stability measurements. ResultsFifty-four patients completed a minimum follow-up of three years (average 49.6 months). The overall success rate was 82.2 %, with Sherman type 1 tears showing significantly fewer failures compared to type 2 (4.3 % vs. 31.8 %). The mean Lysholm score for successful repairs was 96, and the Tegner score dropped from a pre-injury average of 6 to 5. Adolescents had the highest failure rate (50 %), while other age groups showed better outcomes. The mean side-to-side difference in stability was 1.4 mm, favoring the control side. ConclusionPrimary ACL repair is a viable option for selected patients, particularly those with Sherman type 1 tears. While age and tear type significantly affect outcomes, the procedure shows promising results with high functional scores in successful repairs. Further research with larger cohorts and extended follow-ups is necessary to validate these findings and refine patient selection criteria. Primary ACL repair offers a less invasive alternative to ACL reconstruction, with potential for comparable outcome.

Comparison between a Novel Knee Arthrometer and Simultaneous Stress Radiography for the Diagnosis of Complete and Partial Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.

The type of ligamentous tear and the degree of knee laxity have important guiding significancefor the diagnosis and management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Instrumental measurement is necessary for ACL tears since physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot provide an objective and quantitative assessment of knee laxity. This study aimed to compare the application of a novel knee arthrometer and simultaneous stress radiography in differentiating between complete and partial acute ACL tears, and further assess the correlation between the two measurements. A total of 106 patients with complete acute ACL tears and 52 patients with partial acute ACL tears were included in the study. Preoperative arthrometry and simultaneous stress radiography were performed using the Ligs arthrometer at 90, 120, and 150 N to assess side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior knee laxity. The optimal threshold was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic value of the measurement. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the two measurements. The optimal differential SSD thresholds in the Ligs arthrometer were 2.7 mm at 90 N, 3.8 mm at 120 N, and 4.6 mm at 150 N. Similarly, the optimal differential SSD thresholds in simultaneous stress radiography were 3.8 mm at 90 N, 5.1 mm at 120 N, and 5.6 mm at 150 N. The AUC analysis revealed that the Ligs arthrometer was fairly informative at 90 N (AUC = 0.851), 120 N (AUC = 0.878), and 150 N (AUC = 0.884), and simultaneous stress radiography was highly informative at 90 N (AUC = 0.910), 120 N (AUC = 0.925), and 150 N (AUC = 0.948). Moreover, the AUC of the combined measurements was 0.914 at 90 N, 0.931 at 120 N, and 0.951 at 150 N. A significantly strong correlation was found between the two measurements at 90 N (r = 0.743, p < 0.001), 120 N (r = 0.802, p < 0.001), and 150 N (r = 0.823, p < 0.001). The Ligs arthrometer and simultaneous stress radiography proved to be valid diagnostic tools to differentiate between complete and partial acute ACL tears, with a strong correlation between the two measurements in SSD values. Compared with single instrumental measurement, the combination of the two measurements can further improve the diagnostic value in this regard.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Operatively Treated Discoid Lateral Meniscus in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients: A Multicenter Study.

Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is the most common congenital abnormality of the meniscus. Tears are common; treatment is frequently not definitive, often requiring reoperation. To report the clinical manifestations, physical characteristics, operative treatments and findings, complications, and reoperations of DLM in pediatric patients from multiple centers across North America. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Consecutive patients who underwent treatment for symptomatic DLM at 9 institutions between 2000 and 2020 were included. Patient data, presenting symptoms and signs, surgical findings, treatments rendered, and postoperative complications, including reoperation rates, were collected. Means with ranges and counts with proportions are reported for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, and comparisons were made using either the chi-square or Fisher exact test. In total, 784 patients (867 knees) were included with a mean age at diagnosis of 12 years (range, 1-22 years) and a mean follow-up of 22.6 months (range, 0-154 months). Common preoperative symptoms were locking (33%) and snapping (30%). At surgery, tears in the DLM were present in 647 knees (594 patients [76%]); 95 knees (11%) had multiple tears; and in 140 knees, tears extended into >1 zone. Tears, when present, were more common within the posterior horn (41%) or body (34%) than the anterior horn (25%). Peripheral rim instability was reported in 241 knees (28%). Significantly more knees had instability posteriorly (15%; P = .0004) and anteriorly (9%; P = .0013) than along the body (3%). Tear type was most commonly complex (38%) or horizontal (34%). A total of 358 knees in 333 patients with tears (42% of all patients) underwent repair (55% of knees with tears). A total of 175 complications were reported, occurring in 139 knees in 134 patients (17%); 116 of these knees with complications (83%) had a single complication, while 23 (17%) had >1. Of the 784 patients, 105 (13%) underwent reoperation, undergoing 135 additional procedures related to their DLM. Of those, 60 (44%) were repeat arthroscopy and meniscal trim; 40 (30%), arthroscopy and meniscal repair; and 17 (13%), an articular cartilage procedure. Locking and snapping were common presenting symptoms. Over three-quarters of patients had meniscal tears, which were most often complex and located posteriorly. Seventeen percent of patients experienced complications, and a sixth of patients with complications had >1. Reoperation was typically for persistent symptoms or meniscal retear.

Differences in Graft Tear Configurations in Medial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Objective Evaluations Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background: Few studies have compared the characteristics of meniscal allograft tears between medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) using bone fixation. Purpose: To investigate the prevalence, location, and patterns of allograft tears after MAT with the bone fixation technique and compare tear patterns between medial and lateral compartments according to the time elapsed after surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The charts of consecutive patients who underwent primary medial or lateral MAT between December 1996 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The location, pattern, and postoperative periods during which allograft tears occurred were evaluated by reviewing all series of follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and every 2 years thereafter with the patient's agreement. Postoperative periods for allograft tears were defined as the time between surgery and the follow-up MRI scan in which the meniscal tear was first confirmed. Allograft tears were compared between the medial and lateral MAT groups. Results: A total of 327 consecutive patients who underwent MAT (55 medial, 272 lateral) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidences of allograft tears after medial and lateral MATs were 32.7% and 30.9%, respectively. The mean times for tears were 80.1 ± 81.1 months and 48.9 ± 46.3 months in the medial and lateral MAT groups, respectively (P = .130). In both the medial and lateral MAT groups, allograft tears were observed mainly in the posterior horn, with complex tears being the most commonly identified tear type. In medial MATs, root tears were the second most common at 27.8%, with a significantly higher proportion than the lateral MATs (P = .014). On the other hand, in lateral MATs, meniscocapsular separation and radial tears were the second most common at 15.5% each, albeit not significantly more common than in medial MATs (P = .123 and P = .454, respectively). All root tears in medial MATs and meniscocapsular separations in lateral MATs were observed within 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion: Significant differences in allograft tear patterns were identified between the medial and lateral MAT groups. The proportion of root tears in medial MATs was higher than that in lateral MATs; conversely, the proportion of meniscocapsular separation was more common in lateral MATs. Such tear patterns, which may require surgical repair or graft resection, were observed only within 1 year of surgery. Therefore, close observation and regular follow-up in the earlier postoperative period are necessary after medial or lateral MATs.

Fibrin clot augmentation of high-risk meniscal repairs may result in clinical healing in up to 90% of cases

ObjectiveWhile meniscal repair is preferable to meniscectomy, some cases may be at higher risk of failure if repaired. Incorporating fibrin clot (FC) into the repair has been proposed to improve healing rates. The purpose of this study was to determine the failure rates, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications of FC augmented meniscal repair for cases considered to be at higher risk of failure. MethodsA retrospective case series of all patients undergoing FC augmented repair of isolated meniscus tears between January 2016 and September 2021 was undertaken. All cases were thought be at higher risk of failure; they included chronic, radial, complex, horizontal cleavage, and tears not in the red–red zone. Patients were excluded if they had a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or if the repair was done through an open incision. The primary outcome was clinical failure defined as further repair or debridement. Secondary outcomes were PROMs and surgical complications. PROMs collected were Lysholm score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Knee Score and the Tegner score. ResultsFifty one inside-out meniscal repairs using FC were performed in 50 patients (62% male). The mean age was 34 years (range 14–70). The median time from injury to repair was 122 days (range 4–1565). The medial meniscus was repaired in 63% of cases. Tear types included radial (31%) and complex (39%) and 71% of cases included repair of the white–white zone. 16% of cases were revision meniscal repairs. FC was used in 43% of isolated meniscal repairs during the study period. All patients were followed up to a median of 46 months (range 22–87 months). PROMs at a median of 30 months post-operatively showed statistically significant improvements. Five patients (10%) underwent further surgery for failure after median 21 months. Two patients (4%) reported sensory disturbance around their skin wounds, no other complications were reported. 13% of medial meniscal repairs failed, whereas only 5% of lateral meniscal repairs failed (p ​= ​0.4). ConclusionsFC augmented meniscal repair performed for tears considered to be at higher risk of failure may result in acceptably low rates of clinical failure. Level of evidenceLevel IV, case series.

Shoulder balloon spacer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in significant improvements.

The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of balloon implantation in patients with irreparable supraspinatus tears alone or in combination withother rotator cuff (RC) tendon tearsand the effect of several covariables, such as age, gender, status of the long head biceps, with or without tendon repair and regardless the number of tendon involved. Patients enrolled from 'San Carlo' Hospital of Potenza (Italy, IT), from January 2012 to September 2014, underwent arthroscopic implantation of shoulder balloon by a single surgeon, and followed for 3 years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant score (CS) were administered pre-, post-operatively at 12 months, and then annually. Patients were classified on the basis of the number of tendons involved in the tears and treatment performed, considering the reparability of the tendons themselves. Gleno-humeral joint osteoarthrosis (OA) was evaluated through shoulder radiographs and classified according to the Samilson-Prieto classification, at the first examination and at the final follow-up. Statistical improvements were evaluated using a variance model (least-squares means)and a T distribution test for the evaluation between different treatment groups. A total of 61 procedures were performed, and eight patients were lost during follow-up. The mean baseline CS was 30.2 ± 15.4 with statistically significant improvement, respectively, at 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up to 69.3 ± 4.2, 74.6 ± 3.6 and 69.7 ± 5.1 respectively. ASES score at baseline was 22.5 ± 10.9, with a statistically significant improvement to 69.7 ± 9.2, 68 ± 17.8 and 71.2 ± 16.6 at 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up, respectively. Tenotomy or absence of long head biceps at presentation did not influence results (n.s.), with no difference according to gender and age. At final follow-up, 24 patients (43.9%) showed progression of glenohumeral OA. One patient required secondary surgery for shoulder replacement after 18 months for persistent pain and one patient required implant removal following post-operative laser treatment. Arthroscopic rotator cuff tears repair with subacromial spacer balloon implantation showed statistically significant clinical and functional improvement at 3-year follow-up. Patients treated with combined partial repair and subacromial spacer balloon implantation experienced good results independent of gender, age, type of tear and long-head biceps tendon status. The risks related to this procedure appear to be minimal. Level IV.

Prevalence of Articular Surface Injuries in Patients Undergoing Meniscal Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 758 Cases.

Background and aim Meniscal tears are often associated with articular surface damage, which could be an important factor in the clinical outcome. However, these concomitant lesions are usually reported as binary variables. Reports of the severity/extent of the concomitant lesions and stratification by meniscal tear are scarce in the literature; in addition, sample sizes of previous reports are limited. This study aimed to characterize meniscal lesions, determine the prevalence of articular surface lesions and their severity, and correlate these lesions with meniscal injury characteristics. Methods A cross-sectional study of patients undergoing meniscal surgery between 2017 and 2023 was conducted. Patient characteristics and arthroscopic findings on the location and type of meniscal injury as well as the degree of chondral lesion (sICRS score) were recorded by the surgeon. Statistical analysis included frequency reporting for patient characteristics and study variables, including the median and interquartile range of the sICRS classification of articular surface lesions. Meniscal tear types were categorized as degenerative or non-degenerative to explore associations with chondral injury. Chi-squaretestand univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to analyze relationships between variables. Results A total of 758 surgeries were analyzed, with a mean age of 39.56 years (SD: 12.71) and 67.90% male participants. Medial meniscus injuries accounted for 57.52%, lateral meniscus 36.02%, and both menisci 6.64%. Significant differences were found in vascular area, topography, and lesion type between isolated medial and lateral meniscus lesions (p<0.01). Chondral lesions were present in 35.22% of cases, with significant differences among meniscal injury types (p<0.01). Degenerative tears showed higher rates of chondral damage compared to non-degenerative tears, particularly in lateral meniscus injuries (p<0.01). Regression analysis identified age, gender, meniscal injury characteristics, and meniscectomy percentage as risk factors for articular surface injuries. Conclusion Articular surface injuries frequently accompany meniscal lesions, with associations between affected menisci and articular damage extent. Femoral condyles show greater involvement corresponding to compartment-specific meniscal lesions, unlike tibial plateaus. Meniscal degeneration is present in about half of articular cartilage injury cases. Some meniscal tear types may relate to more severe articular lesions, but larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore other tear patterns.

Location of medial collateral ligament tears: introduction to a magnetic resonance imaging-based classification.

Despite established tear grade classifications, there is currently no radiological classification for sMCL tear locations. This study aims to establish a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tear location classification system for sMCL tears, to enhance understanding and guide treatment decisions by categorizing tear types. A retrospective search in a single institution's MRI database identified patients with acute, Grade III sMCL tears (< 30days between injury and MRI) from January to December 2022. Non-acute and partial tears were excluded, and three observers assessed tear types based on the proposed sMCL MRI tear location system: type I (proximal 25%), Ib (proximal femoral bony avulsion), II (midsubstance, 25-75%), III (distal 25%), IIIb (distal tibial bony avulsion), IIIs (Stener-like lesion). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interrater and intrarater reliability for continuous data; Fleiss and Cohen's kappa assessed interrater and intrarater reliability for categorical data. MRI scans of thirty patients with diagnosed sMCL injuries (53% female, mean age 37 ± 13years, range 16-68years) were included based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC: 0.968, 95% CI, 0.933-0.985), and intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC: 0.938, 95% CI: 0.874-0.970 & 0.900, 95% CI, 0.789-0.952). Type I injuries were most common (60%), followed by type III (33.3%), type II (3.3%), type Ib (3.3%), type IIIb (0.0%), and type IIIs (0.0%). The presented MRI-based sMCL tear location classification provides a reproducible system for grading high-grade sMCL injuries. We propose that this framework will significantly unify tear location understanding and support more informed treatment decisions.

THE OUTCOME OF THE PATTERN OF MENISCAL TEARS IN ACL DEFICIENT KNEE

Meniscal tears commonly co-occur with ACL tears, and many studies address their side, pattern, and distribution. Few studies assess the patient's short-term functional outcome concerning tear radial and circumferential distribution based on the Cooper et al. classification. Meniscal tears require primary adequate treatment to restore knee function. Our hypothesis is to preserve the meniscal rim as much as possible to maintain the load-bearing capacity of the menisci after meniscectomy.The purpose of this study is to document the location and type of meniscal tears that accompany anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and their effect on patient functional outcomes following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and meniscectomy.This prospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted at AL-BASRA Teaching Hospital in Iraq between July 2018 and January 2020 among patients with combined ipsilateral ACL injury and meniscal tears. A total of 28 active young male patients, aged 18 to 42 years, were included. All patients were subjected to our questionnaire, full history, systemic and regional examination, laboratory investigations, imaging studies, preoperative rehabilitation, and were followed by Lysholm score 6 months postoperatively.All 28 patients were males, with a mean age of 27 ± 0.14 years. The right knee was the most commonly affected in 20/28 patients (71.4%). The medial meniscus was most commonly injured in 11 patients, 7 patients had lateral meniscal tears, and 10 patients had tears in both menisci. The most common tear pattern of the medial meniscus was a bucket handle tear (36.4%), while longitudinal tears were the most frequent in the lateral meniscus (71.4%) (P-value = 0.04). The most common radial tear location was zone E-F (5/28, 17.8%), and the most common circumferential zone affected was the middle and inner third, reported in 50% of tears. Good and excellent outcomes using the Lysholm score after 6 months were obtained in 42.9% and 17.9% of patients, respectively. Better functional scores were associated with lateral meniscal tears, bucket handle tears, tears extending to a more peripheral vascular area, and if no more than one-third of the meniscus was resected (P-value = 0.002). Less favourable outcomes were reported in smokers, posterior horn tears, and when surgery was delayed more than 1 year (P-value = 0.03).We conclude that there is a negative correlation between the amount of meniscus resected and functional outcome. Delayed ACL reconstruction increases the risk of bimeniscal tears. Bucket handle tears are the most common tears, mostly in the medial meniscus, while longitudinal tears are most common in the lateral meniscus. We recommend performing early ACL reconstruction within 12 months to reduce the risk of bimeniscal injuries.

Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury.

To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in evaluating meniscal abnormalities in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and recognize predictors of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) MRI diagnosis. Four hundred twenty patients (mean age, 27.2years; 326 males, 94 females) who underwent arthroscopy for ACL injury between January 2017 and August 2022, and had preoperative imaging within 4months, were retrospectively included. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, noting the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears including tear type and location. Results were correlated with arthroscopic findings. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to study risk factors (RF) for FP and FN MRI diagnosis. The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of MRI for medial meniscus tear was 97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%; for lateral meniscus tear, it was 83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55% /87.86%, with substantial interreader agreement. Female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.434), posterior horn and posterior root tears (OR, 3.268/22.588), horizontal tear (OR, 3.134), and ramp lesion (OR, 4.964) were found RF for FP medial meniscus, and meniscal body tears (OR, 308.011) were found RF for FP lateral meniscus. RF for FN medial meniscus were meniscal tear at the posterior horn, body, and posterior root (OR, 12.371/123.000/13.045). MRI is an effective screening tool for meniscal tears, but less accurate in detecting all medial meniscus injuries. Gender, meniscal tear location, and type increased the risk of FP medial meniscal tear on MRI, while meniscal tear location increased the risk of FP lateral meniscus and FN medial meniscus tears.

Poster 336: Reliability of Preoperative MRI in the Prediction of ACL Tear Type

Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are among the most frequent ligament injuries in the United States. Most of these injuries are treated surgically, depending on patient-specific factors. Management of these injuries includes nonoperative management with stepwise rehabilitation or surgical treatment with ACL repair or reconstruction. Patient goals, a clinical evaluation, and preoperative MRI imaging are generally assessed to inform the choice of treatment. Classification of ACL tear-type based on stump morphology is critical to preoperative planning, as it can determine a patient’s eligibility for ACL preservation techniques. We aim to determine the efficacy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting ruptured ACL stump morphology and thus assist in preoperative planning and decision-making. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized chart review from the case log of a single surgeon at an urban tertiary institution. The review identified patients who underwent the Bridge Enhanced ACL Repair (BEAR) procedure between January 1, 2022 and August 31, 2023. The inclusion criteria included patients who underwent a primary ACL repair with the BEAR technique and had adequate intraoperative and MRI images available for review. Patients excluded were those with inadequate intraoperative imaging or MRI imaging that was unavailable for review. For each patient included, the two senior authors assessed the morphology of the ACL stump on MRI (sagittal T2, coronal T2) and intraoperative arthroscopy images in a blinded manner and assigned a classification grade to each. The MRI-based morphology and the intraoperative image morphology of the tears were classified based on a system validated by DeFelice et al, which includes types 1 to 5 based on the location of the tear from most proximal to most distal. The correlation between the preoperative MRI assessment and the intraoperative arthroscopic assessment was interrogated using simple linear regression quantified with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 35 patients that underwent the BEAR procedure were identified. One patient was excluded due to inadequate intraoperative images. Of the remaining patients, 13 (38.2%) were male and 21 (61.8%) were female. The average patient age was 31, with a median age of 28. Most patients were injured while skiing (32.4%), while the second and third most prevalent mechanisms of injury were nonsports-related (23.4%) and soccer injuries (17.6%), respectively. Of the MRI tears that were analyzed, 9 (26.5%) were classified as type 1, 19 (55.9%) were type 2, and 5 (14.7%) were type 3. There were no tears identified as types 4 or 5 tears. Of the arthroscopic images that were analyzed, 21 (61.8%) were classified as type 1, 10 (29.4%) were type 2, 3 (8.8%) were type 3. Similarly, there were no tears identified as types 4 or 5. MRI accurately predicted the ACL tear type seen arthroscopically 55.9% (19/34) of the time. Of the (15) cases in which MRI did not correlate with the arthroscopic tear type, the MRI classification grade was within 1 grade of the arthroscopic grade 93.3% of the time (14/15). In the cases in which MRI was not correct in its grading, 93.3% of them (14/15) were classified as too high of a grade (MRI perceiving the tear to be more distal than it was in actuality). The Pearson correlation coefficient assessing the correlation between MRI identified tear type and arthroscopy identified tear type was 0.56. Conclusions: MRI accurately predicted the ACL tear type seen arthroscopically in only 55.9% of patients. In &gt;90% of incorrect predictions, arthroscopy determined the ACL tear to be one classification more proximal than predicted by MRI. Our results demonstrate that while preoperative MRI can be useful in identifying approximate ACL tear location, it is essential to examine the ACL at time of arthroscopy for final determination of ACL stump size and viability for ACL restoration procedures. Moreover, a greater percentage of patients may be eligible for an ACL restoration procedure than predicted by preoperative MRI, highlighting the importance of discussing both ACL repair and ACL reconstruction with patients preoperatively. [Figure: see text]

Poster 303: Outcomes Following Repair of Radial Meniscus Tears Compared to Bucket Handle Meniscus Tears

Objectives: Preserving the meniscus has become a priority in managing meniscal tears with advancement of meniscus repair techniques. Meniscal repair, as opposed to partial meniscectomy, reduces risk of development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Radial meniscus tears have traditionally been associated with a poor prognosis because they occur perpendicular to circumferential meniscal fibers, compromising hoop tension. Advances in surgical technique and biologic augmentation have facilitated repair of these complex injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare post-operative complication and surgical revision rates in patients who underwent repair of a radial meniscus tear versus bucket-handle meniscus tear. We hypothesized the outcomes of repair of radial meniscus tear would be similar to a matched group of patients who underwent repair of a bucket handle meniscus tear. Methods: A retrospective study was performed to identify patients who underwent repair of radial meniscus tear. Chart review was performed for 1506 patients who underwent meniscus repair from 2012 to 2019, and demographic information, type of meniscus tear, concomitant ACL reconstruction, post-operative complications, repeat surgeries, and failure at the repair site were detailed in a database. Patients who underwent repair of a radial tear were matched with patients who underwent repair of a bucket-handle tear based on sex, age (within 5 years), BMI (within 5 kg/m2), meniscus laterality, and concomitant ACL reconstruction. Isolated meniscus repairs were augmented with platelet rich plasma (PRP). Results: Fifty patients (age, 31.8 ± 15.2 years; BMI, 30.2 ± 6.4 kg/m2) were identified who underwent a radial meniscus tear repair. Of these patients, 16 (32.0%) were female and 23 (46.0%) underwent concomitant ACL reconstruction. Complications including recurrent swelling, stiffness, persistent pain, and repeat injury were reported in 15 patients (30.0%). Six patients underwent repeat surgery (12.0%). Four repeat surgical patients, who had previously undergone meniscus repair and concomitant ACL reconstruction, were found to have an intact radial repair at the time of second surgery, and underwent repeat surgery for a reason unrelated to the radial tear repair (e.g. cyclops lesion, synovectomy, new meniscus tear). Two patients had a radial tear repair failure that required surgical revision (4.0%). Radial tear repair patients who underwent concomitant ACL reconstruction differed significantly from those who did not only in age (ACL group, 26.0 ± 10.9 y; non-ACL group, 36.6 ± 16.7 y; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications, repeat surgeries, or failures between the radial and bucket-handle tear repair patients. Conclusions: Repair of radial meniscus tears with contemporary techniques and biological enhancement with either ACL reconstruction or PRP can be expected to have similar outcomes to repairs of bucket handle meniscus tears.

Poster 347: Return to Sports of ACL Primary Repair Versus Autograft ACL Reconstruction at 2-year Follow-Up

Objectives: To evaluate the psychological readiness to return to sports (RTS), and assess the rates of RTS at preinjury level in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR) with suture versus autograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR) at minimum 2-year follow-up (FU). Methods: Consecutive patients &lt;50 years old and a preinjury Tegner score of ≥5, undergoing either ACLPR or ACLR by a single surgeon, between January 2018 and April 2021, were considered for eligibility. Surgical indication for either ACLPR with suture augmentation or autograft ACLR (58% hamstring- and 42% quadriceps tendon graft) was based on intra-operatively determined ACL tear type and tissue quality. ACLPR was performed in all patients with proximal type I or II types and good to excellent tissue quality, whereas ACLR was only performed when tear characteristics contraindicated ACL repair. To evaluate success of RTS, activity level (Tegner Activity Scale), psychological readiness to RTS (ACL-Return to Sport After Injury [RSI] score) and instrumented anterior-tibial translation side-to-side difference (ATT-SSD) were evaluated at minimum 2-year FU. Results: A total of 181 patients (100 ACLPR, 81 ACLR), were evaluated at final FU (mean ± SD (range), 3.2 ± 0.9 (2 to 5) years). A significantly greater number of patients undergoing ACLPR returned to their preinjury activity level (73% vs. 47%, p &lt; .001), and further presented significantly better ACL-RSI scores (75.3 ± 22.2 vs. 66.6 ±24.2, p = .023) at minimum 2-year FU. Instrumented knee laxity revealed similar results for both treatment groups (ACLPR, 0.80 ±1.2 mm vs. ACLR, 0.97 ± 1.2 mm, p = .449). Conclusions: Patients undergoing ACLPR demonstrate greater return to preinjury activity level and greater confidence in their operated knee when performing their respective sport at 2-year FU compared to ACLR.

Bone cysts at the meniscal attachment are associated with a longer symptom duration among patients with arthroscopically treated medial meniscus posterior root tear.

To elucidate the features of bone cysts at attachment sites of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). Knees treated using arthroscopic surgery for MMPRT between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients without a memory of onset (painful popping), prior knee surgeries, concomitant ligament or meniscus injuriesor fractures were excluded. Duration from onset to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and type of tear were evaluated during arthroscopy. On radiography, meniscus signs (cleft/ghost/giraffe neck), bone cysts at the attachment site of the MMPRTand posterior shiny-corner lesions (PSCLs; bone marrow lesions on the meniscal-covered portion of the posterior tibial plateau) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the bone cysts were assessed by comparison with matched patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for medial meniscus posterior horn tear. In addition, subgroups (cyst-positive/cyst-negative) among patients with MMPRT were created to assess the features of bone cysts. A total of 275 patients with MMPRT and 275 matched patients with posterior horn tears were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of bone cysts for MMPRT in this study were 22.2% and 98.6%, respectively. Among the 275 knees with MMPRT, compared with the cyst-negative group, the cyst-positive group had a longer duration from onset to MRI (12.9 ± 13.1 vs. 8.3 ± 10.9 weeks, respectively, p = 0.025) and reduced occurrence of PSCLs (18.0% vs. 42.0%, respectively, p = 0.031). The occurrence of bone cysts at the attachment site was helpful for the accurate diagnosis of MMPRT and related to longer duration from onset to MRI and reduced PSCLs. Level III, cross-sectional study.

Perspective on Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Meniscal Repair: Insights From a Lower Middle-Income Country.

Background Meniscal tears are a common injury in the adult population. With the advent of newer devices, the adoption of the all-inside repair technique has been expanding substantially because of its feasibility and reduced risk to surrounding neurovascular structures. This study was conducted in a lower middle-income country to assess the functional outcome of the arthroscopic all-inside technique and to identify the potential factors that may affect the functional outcome that will eventually influence the future management of these patients. Method This study is a retrospective case series conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Patients presenting to the outpatient clinics with meniscal tears who underwent arthroscopic all-inside repair from January 2015 to December 2021 were included in this study. The exclusion criteria included patients who had associated fractures and patients with meniscal tears greater than six months ago. Results A total of 29 patients underwent all-inside meniscal repair for meniscus tears. The mean age of our patients was 26.31 years (SD = 7.11 years), ranging from 17 years to 48 years. Of these patients, 26 were males and three were females, accounting for 89.7% and 10.3%, respectively. The most frequent mechanism of injury was twisting while playing sports, accounting for 51.7%, followed by falling while playing sports and road traffic accidents (RTAs), accounting for 13.8% and 20.7%, respectively. Of the 29 patients, 16 (55.2%) had lateral meniscal injuries, 10 (34.5%) were diagnosed with medial meniscus injuries, and three (10.3%) had injuries to both menisci. The most common type of tear that was observed in our sample size was bucket handle tears, which were found in 14 patients, accounting for a total of 48.3%, followed by complex tears in seven patients (24.1%). The majority of the patients, i.e., 19 out of 29 patients (65.5%), had an acute course of injury, i.e., less than six weeks. For the functional outcome, the Lysholm score was calculated at 12 months and was found to be excellent in 17 patients, good in six patients, and fair in six patients, accounting for 58.6%, 20.7%, and 20.7%, respectively. The mean Lysholm score was 90.03 ± 8.85 points. Of the 29 patients, 27 (93.2%) had no complaints at the regular 12-month follow-up, whereas one patient (3.4%) experienced rotatory instability and one patient (3.4%) experienced stiffness at the knee joint. None of the patients had to undergo a reoperation. The mean Lysholm score in the 25 patients who had an associated anterior cruciate ligament tear was 89.64 ± 9.442 points, whereas the four patients who had an isolated meniscal tear had a mean score of 92.50 ± 2.887 points, which was not significantly different (p-value = 0.831). Conclusion All-inside meniscal repair for treating meniscal tears has become the new treatment paradigm as it not only renders excellent functional outcomes with minimal complications but also prevents damage to the surrounding neurovasculature and the soft tissue envelope as it is a minimally invasive technique.

Meniscus Tears in Elite Athletes: Treatment Considerations, Clinical Outcomes, and Return to Play.

Management of meniscal injuries in the elite athlete is a difficult problem secondary to the high demands of athletic competition, the need for a timely return to sport, and the desire to maximize performance over time. The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the current literature and trends regarding the management of meniscus injuries with a special consideration for elite athletes. Historically, partial meniscectomy has been the primary treatment option for meniscus injuries. However, in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on meniscus preservation due to the increased risk of cartilage degeneration over time. Moreover, while partial meniscectomy still provides a quicker return to sport (RTS), recent literature has demonstrated similar rates of RTS and return to pre-injury levels between partial meniscectomy and meniscus repair. In the setting of symptomatic meniscal deficiency, meniscus allograft transplantation has become an increasingly utilized salvage procedure with promising yet variable outcomes on the ability to withstand elite competition. Currently, there is no uniform approach to treating meniscal injuries in elite athletes. Therefore, an individualized approach is required with consideration of the meniscus tear type, location, concomitant injuries, athlete expectations, rehabilitation timeline, and desire to prevent or delay knee osteoarthritis. In athletes with anatomically repairable tears, meniscus repair should be performed given the ability to restore native anatomy, provide high rates of RTS, and mitigate long-term chondral damage. However, partial meniscectomy can be indicated for unrepairable tears.

Superior capsular reconstruction with the long head of the biceps tendon achieves excellent clinical results and low rotator cuff rerupture rates one year after cuff repair surgery.

To analyze the clinical one-year evolution of healed and rerupture lesions in patients who received a rotator cuff repair plus Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps (LHB). Moreover, to compare this evolution between men and women. A pilot study was conducted on patients who underwent a rotator cuff repair plus SCR with LHB between February 2021 and June 2022. All patients completed pre-operative and one-year post-operative evaluations for tendon type of tear and tendon integrity using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)after one year of the surgery. Besides, functionality was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the visual analog scale for pain (VAS); and the Constant score. A total of 38 patients completed the one-year final evaluation, they presented an increased functionality score to 83 and 86 in Constant and ASES scales (p < .001), respectively. Besides, 84% of the patients presented a healed cuff, while rerupture occurred in 16% of the patients. There were differences between the healed and rerupture patients in the total Constant score, with a remarkable increase in the strength subscale, almost double for patients with healed cuff (p < .001); in the same way, daily life activity score, and balance subscale increased, while pain score decreased in the healed cuff group (p < .05). There was no difference in functionality between men and women (p > .05). Besides, almost all patients achieved the MCID in both ASES and Constant total scores, irrespectively of the healing group. The cuff repair using SCR with the LHB achieved a low percentage of rerupture and a functional improvement after one year of follow-up. Patients who healed the lesion presented more strength and better performance in daily life activities than those with cuff repurture. Thus, SCR + LHB procedure can be considered an efficient technique for rotator cuff repair surgery for both men and women. Although a comparison with a control group is needed to confirm these findings.

Arthroscopic Margin Convergence Repair Without Suture Anchors Improves Clinical Outcomes for Full- and Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

To evaluate the clinical outcome scores of an arthroscopic margin convergence technique without the use of suture anchors to repair different types of rotator cuff tears and to determine whether the type or extent of the tear has an effect on clinical outcome scores after this procedure. Patients receiving arthroscopic margin convergence repair without suture anchors for rotator cuff tears from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Arthroscopically determined partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum follow-up period of 20 months were included. Outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score; and visual analog scale (VAS) score. A 2-tailed distribution paired t test was used to determine statistical significance (P < .05) between preoperative scores and scores at final follow-up. Correlation tests and linear regression analysis were used to determine the correlation between various clinical variables and outcomes. A cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference analysis was performed for each outcome score, calculated as one-half of the standard deviation of the delta score. A total of 38 patients were included for analysis: 12 with partial-thickness tears and 26 with full-thickness tears. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 33.9 months (range, 22.2-94.5 months), with a minimum follow-up period of 22 months. The mean age of the patients was 62 ± 15.1 years. The minimal clinically important difference values for the ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores were 9.68, 2.92, and 1.13, respectively. There were significant improvements in the ASES (from 29.3 ± 18.3 preoperatively to 93.7 ± 8.3 postoperatively, P= .001), UCLA (from 14.3 ± 6.2 to 32.8 ± 2.6, P= .001), and VAS (from 7.37 ± 1.8 to 0.63 ± 1.02, P= .001) clinical outcome scores. However, patients with either Patte stage 3 retraction (P= .033 for ASES score and P=.020 for UCLA score) or U-shaped tears (P= .047 for ASES score and P= .050 for UCLA score) had significantly lower clinical outcome scores than patients with less severe retraction or differently shaped tears. The arthroscopic margin convergence technique without the use of suture anchors may be a suitable option in patients with partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Level IV, therapeutic case series.