Type B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Research Articles

Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases

PurposePeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) around the hip are challenging complications in orthopaedic surgery, particularly Vancouver type B2 (VTB2) fractures. The surgical management of these fractures is crucial and depends on various factors. Cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis is an alternative surgical technique. This study aims to compare the outcomes of this surgical technique with revision arthroplasty (RA) with long stem in the treatment of VTB2 PPFs.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted in a single medical institute from February 2010 to May 2019. Patients who had received either total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty and subsequently developed a VTB2 PPF were included; patients who sustained intra-operative fractures or received a cemented stem previously were excluded from the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: group I received RA with cementless long stem, while group II underwent RA with cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis. Demographic data, radiographic and functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed between the two groups.ResultsA total of 85 patients diagnosed with VTB2 PPFs were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, including age, gender, mean follow-up times, estimated blood loss, and operative times. The radiographic results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of subsidence and implant stability between the two groups. However, group II tended to have less subsidence and periprosthetic osteolysis. Patients in group II had significantly better functional scores (mean Harris hip score: post-operative: 60.2 in group I and 66.7 in group ii; last follow-up: 77.4 in group 1 and 83.2 in group II (both p < 0.05)). There were no significant differences in the overall complication rate, including infection, dislocation, re-fracture, and revision surgery, between the two groups.ConclusionsBoth surgical techniques, cementless long stem and cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis, are effective in the treatment of Vancouver B2 PPFs, with no significant differences in outcomes or complications. However, patients in cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis had better functional scores at both post-operative and the last follow-up.

Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to report mid-term clinical and radiographic results after hip arthroplasty revision in Vancouver type B2 femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). Specifical focus of the paper is as follows: (1) the description of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, (2) functional outcomes presentation and (3) type and number of complications and implants’ survival rate analysis.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for hip revision with non-modular tapered fluted titanium stem in patients with Vancouver type B2 femur PPFx at a single institution. At least 18 months’ follow-up period was required. Harris Hip Scores and SF-12 were obtained, and radiographical follow-up was performed. Complications were reported and analyzed.ResultsThe authors included 114 patients (114 hips) with a mean follow-up of 62.8 ± 30.6 months. All patients were treated with Wagner SL revision hip stem (Zimmer-Biomet), metal cerclage wires ± trochanteric plate. The mean HHS and SF-12 score at the last follow-up evaluation were respectively 81.3 ± 9.7 and 32.5 ± 7.6. Seventeen (14.9%) complications occurred. We observed five cases of dislocations, two of periprosthetic joint infections and six cases of new PPFx. The stem-related revision rate for any cause at the final FU was 1.7%, due to PJI. No patients underwent stem revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Fracture healed in all the included patients with a union-rate of 100%. The re-operation rate for any cause was 9.6%, with an implant survival rate for overall failure of 96.5%.ConclusionThe presented standard and reproducible surgical technique obtains optimal clinical and radiological results with limited complication rate at mid-term follow up. Preoperative planning as well as careful intraoperative surgical technique is of a paramount importance.

Ten to 13-Year Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 30 Years Old.

We previously reported mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in 72 patients (86 hips) who were <30 years old. Noise was noted in 8 (9.3%) of the hips, no osteolysis or loosening was detected, and no patient required reoperation. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and survivorship at >10 years after THA using Delta CoC bearings in patients who were <30 years old. Cementless THA with a Delta CoC bearing was performed between March 2008 and January 2012 in 91 hips of 76 patients who were <30 years old. Eighty-five hips in 71 patients (44 men and 27 women) with a mean age of 25.9 years (range, 16 to 29 years) at surgery were followed for a mean of 10.9 years (range, 10 to 13 years). No ceramic bearings fractured. The incidence of squeaking increased to 5.9% (5 of 85), but the squeaking was not reproducible within individual patients. Periprosthetic osteolysis developed in 3 hips (3 patients): around the stem in 2 and around the metal shell in 1. The stem in 1 hip underwent revision because of a Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture. One patient with systemic lupus erythematosus underwent irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Survivorship free of reoperation for any reason was 92.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.4% to 100%) at 13 years. The long-term results and survivorship of Delta CoC THA in patients <30 years old were favorable. Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Stability of Fixation of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Effect of Implantation Technique

BackgroundDue to increasing volume of total hip arthroplasties, periprosthetic femoral fractures have become a common complication with increased revision burden and perioperative morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fixation stability of Vancouver B2 fractures treated with 2 techniques. MethodsA common B2 fracture was created by reviewing 30 type B2 cases. The fracture was then reproduced in 7 pairs of cadaveric femora. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. In Group I (“reduce-first”), the fragments were reduced first, followed by implantation of a tapered fluted stem. In Group II (“ream-first”), the stem was implanted in the distal femur first, followed by fragment reduction and fixation. Each specimen was loaded in a multiaxial testing frame with 70% of peak load during walking. A motion capture system was used to track the motion of the stem and fragments. ResultsThe average stem diameter in Group II was 16.1 ± 0.4 mm, versus 15.4 ± 0.5 mm in Group I. The fixation stability was not significantly different in the 2 groups. After the testing, the average stem subsidence was 0.36 ± 0.31 mm and 0.19 ± 0.14 mm (P = .17) and the average rotation was 1.67 ± 1.30° and 0.91 ± 1.11° (P = .16) in Groups I and II, respectively. Compared to the stem, there was less motion of the fragments and there was no difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). ConclusionsWhen tapered fluted stems were used in combination with cerclage cables for treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, both the “reduce-first” and “ream-first” techniques showed adequate stem and fracture stability.

Impact of bone health on the mechanics of plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BackgroundCondyle-spanning plate-screw constructs have shown potential to lower the risks of femoral refractures after the healing of a primary Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture. Limited information exists to show how osteoporosis (a risk factor for periprosthetic femoral fractures) may affect the plate fixation during activities of daily living. MethodsUsing total hip arthroplasty and plate-implanted finite element models of three osteoporotic femurs, this study simulated physiological loads of three activities of daily living, as well as osteoporosis associated muscle weakening, and compared the calculated stress/strain, load transfer and local stiffness with experimentally validated models of three healthy femurs. Two plating systems and two construct lengths (a diaphyseal construct and a condyle-spanning construct) were modeled. FindingsOsteoporotic femurs showed higher bone strain (21.9%) and higher peak plate stress (144.3%) as compared with healthy femurs. Compared with shorter diaphyseal constructs, condyle-spanning constructs of two plating systems reduced bone strains in both healthy and osteoporotic femurs (both applying ‘the normal’ and ‘the weakened muscle forces’) around the most distal diaphyseal screw and in the distal metaphysis, both locations where secondary fractures are typically reported. The lowered resultant compressive force and the increased local compressive stiffness in the distal diaphysis and metaphysis may be associated with strain reductions via condyle-spanning constructs. InterpretationStrain reductions in condyle-spanning constructs agreed with the clinically reported lowered risks of femoral refractures in the distal diaphysis and metaphysis. Multiple condylar screws may mitigate the concentrated strains in the lateral condyle, especially in osteoporotic femurs.

The effect of onlay cortical fibula strut grafts on biomechanical features of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

This study aimed to investigate biomechanically the effects of onlay fibula grafts on Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures (PPFs). Vancouver Type B1 PFF models were created in 25 fourth-generation synthetic femurs and fixed with locking plates using bicortical, unicortical screws, and cables. While no graft was used in group 1, onlay fibula grafts were placed anteriorly in group 2 and medially in group 3. In group 4, the cortical strut allograft was placed on the medial femoral cortex, and a locking compression plate (LCP) was applied to the lateral femoral cortex. In group 5, the strut allograft was placed over the anterior cortex of the femur and fixed with the same technique as in group 4. All models were then subjected to rotational and axial cyclical stiffness tests and load to failure to measure and compare the mechanical strengths of the constructs. The mean stiffness values of group 4 with medial allograft, before and after cyclical loading, were higher than all other groups, under both rotational and axial forces. The mean stiffness values of fibula autografts (groups 2 and 3) were similar to that of anterior allografts (group 5) in each test except that the mean initial axial stiffness of group 5 was higher than group 2. Failure loads were also not different between the groups. Although the rigidity of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femur fractures is highest if allografts are placed medially, fibula autografts can also provide similar fixation strengths to allografts if locking plates with unicortical and bicortical screws and cables are used.

Optimal configuration of a three-rod ortho-bridge system in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A finite element analysis

Introduction and AimPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) represent an increasing clinical and economic burden. This study aims to determine the optimal configuration of a bridge-combined internal fixation system in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 PFF, using finite element analysis. Materials and methodsA three-rod ortho-bridge system (OBS) fixation model was used to evaluate the optimal configuration of four target parameters: position of the third rod; intersection angle between the proximal screws; connecting rod diameter; and number of screws used. Femoral displacement and the maximum von Mises stress of the OBS were used as the evaluation indices, to analyze the PFF and to determine the optimal use of an OBS. For each parameter, various candidate options were tested. ResultsFinite element analysis revealed that the rate of femoral displacement and the maximum von Mises stress of the OBS were at a minimum when there was a 35 mm downward movement of the third rod from the baseline. Therefore, the optimal position of third rod fixation was 35 mm below the fovea capitis of the femur. The optimal intersection angles between the proximal screws were found to be 71.92° or 84°. A 6 mm diameter connecting rod proved to be most effective. Configuration d, utilizing 7 screws, represented the most clinically appropriate screw number configuration, despite configuration f, utilizing 9 screws, eliciting the best evaluation indices. ConclusionAn OBS used in the above-described configuration is well suited to the characteristics of PFF and provides an effective and reliable means for their treatment.

The impact of stem fixation method on Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management.

Introduction: Our understanding of the impact of the stem fixation method in total hip arthroplasty (THA) on the subsequent management of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) is still limited. This study aimed to investigate and quantify the effect of the stem fixation method, i.e., cemented vs. uncemented THA, on the management of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures with the same plate. Methods: Eight laboratory models of synthetic femora were divided into two groups and implanted with either a cemented or uncemented hip prosthesis. The overall stiffness and strain distribution were measured under an anatomical one-legged stance. All eight specimens underwent an osteotomy to simulate Vancouver type B1 PFF’s. Fractures were then fixed using the same extramedullary plate and screws. The same measurements and fracture movement were taken under the same loading conditions. Results: Highlighted that the uncemented THA and PFF fixation constructs had a lower overall stiffness. Subsequently, the mechanical strain on the fracture plate for the uncemented construct was higher compared to the cemented constructs. Conclusion: PFF fixation of a Vancouver type B1 fracture using a plate may have a higher risk of failure in uncemented THAs.

Impact of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation plating constructs on local stiffness, load transfer, and bone strains

Secondary femoral fractures after the successful plate-screw fixation of a primary Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) have been associated with the altered state of stress/strain in the femur as the result of plating. The laterally implanted condyle-spanning plate-screw constructs have shown promises clinically in avoiding secondary bone and implant failures as compared with shorter diaphyseal plates. Though the condyle-spanning plating has been hypothesized to avoid stress concentration in the femoral diaphysis through increasing the working length of the plate, biomechanical evidence is lacking on how plate length may impact the stress/strain state of the implanted femur. Through developing and experimentally validating finite element (FE) models of 3 cadaveric femurs, this study investigated the impact of plating on bone strains, load transfer and local stiffness, which were compared between FE models of 2 different plating systems that each had a diaphyseal configuration and a condyle-spanning configuration. Under simulated gait-loading, the condyle-spanning constructs of both plating systems were shown to lower the bone strains around the distal fixation screws (up to 24.8% reduction in maximum principal strain and 26.6% reduction in minimum principal strain) and in the distal metaphyseal shaft of the femur (up to 15.9% and 25.7% reductions in maximum and minimum principal strains, respectively), where secondary bone fractures have been typically reported. In the distal diaphyseal and metaphyseal shaft of femur, FE models of the condyle-spanning constructs were shown to increase the local compressive stiffness (up to 152.9% increases under simulated gait-loading) and decrease the transfer of compressive load (37.1% decreases under simulated gait-loading), which may be indicative of the lowered risks of bone damage.

Simplified Mechanical Tests Can Simulate Physiological Mechanics of a Fixation Construct for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures.

Plate fractures after fixation of a Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) are difficult to treat and could lead to severe disability. However, due to the lack of direct measurement of in vivo performance of the PFF fixation construct, it is unknown whether current standard mechanical tests or previous experimental and computational studies have appropriately reproduced the in vivo mechanics of the plate. To provide a basis for the evaluation and development of appropriate mechanical tests for assessment of plate fracture risk, this study applied loads of common activities of daily living (ADLs) to implanted femur finite element (FE) models with PFF fixation constructs with an existing or a healed PFF. Based on FE simulated plate mechanics, the standard four-point-bend test adequately matched the stress state and the resultant bending moment in the plate as compared with femur models with an existing PFF. In addition, the newly developed constrained three-point-bend tests were able to reproduce plate stresses in models with a healed PFF. Furthermore, a combined bending and compression cadaveric test was appropriate for risk assessment including both plate fracture and screw loosening after the complete healing of PFF. The result of this study provides the means for combined experimental and computational preclinical evaluation of PFF fixation constructs.

Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Vancouver Type-B2 and B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures.

Revision arthroplasty (RA) continues to be considered the gold standard in the surgical treatment of Vancouver type-B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. However, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has been associated with satisfactory outcomes. Thus, there is an ongoing discussion regarding the optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of these fractures. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, no significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcome were observed between ORIF and RA in the treatment of Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures. ORIF of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures was associated with higher revision and reoperation rates than those after RA. Compared with RA, a significantly higher rate of subsidence was found in the ORIF group in Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures whereas no significant difference in terms of loosening was observed. In the comparison of RA and ORIF for the treatment of Vancouver type-B2 and B3 fractures, the percentage of patients achieving full weight-bearing did not differ significantly. Mortality rates did not differ between RA and ORIF in the treatment of Vancouver type-B2 and B3 fractures. Overall complication rates did not differ between RA and ORIF in the treatment of Vancouver type-B2 and B3 fractures. We found a high heterogeneity in applied surgical and fixation techniques in the ORIF group.

Treatment of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures using Intrauma Iron Lady® locking plate: A retrospective study on 32 patients

IntroductionPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) actually represent a serious public health problem. They are reported to occur in 0,1-4.5% of all patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR). PFF are commonly distinguished using the Vancouver classification. This study principal aim is to evaluate results obtained using the Intrauma Iron Lady® Conical Coupling locking plate for the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Materials and MethodsWe enrolled 32 patients affected by Vancouver B1 PFF and treated with the same device. Metal cerclages were additionally used in 12 (38%) patients. A clinical and radiographical post-operative follow-up was then planned at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery; than the follow-up was annually fixed. ResultsMean age at the moment of trauma was 76,7 years. All involved femoral stem were uncemented and the they were all radiographically and intraoperativelly judged to be stable. Mean post-operative follow-up period was 5,8 years. 29 patients (91%) presented healed fracture at 6 months follow-up. 9% patients developed a superficial surgical site infection. Discussion and ConclusionsLiterature highlights that Vancouver B1 PFF should be treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using polyaxial locking plates. However, no single technique has gained universal acceptance to be superior that the other. The current reported healing rate ranges from 40 to 100%. Using the Intrauma Iron Lady® Conical Coupling locking plate, we obtained a healing rate of 91%; this data is consistent with recent literature. Moreover, the role of cerclages in addition to femoral plating is actually controversial because they potentially damage the soft callus vascularization. Our results showed no difference in term of healing rate between patients with and without cerclages, according with some of most recent articles. A prospective study with a higher number of patients should be carried out in order to better evaluate the role of cerclages on healing rate but also the complications frequency after PFF surgical treatment.

Plain films are not accurate in planning internal fixation in vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures and in distinguishing between subtypes B1 And B2.

While few studies analysed the diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in distinguishing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), no investigation has been conducted to assess the degree of diagnostic validity of preoperative radiographs in identifying the fracture course and planning the most appropriate treatment. We analysed the diagnostic validity of radiographs in detecting the fracture course and stem stability in Vancouver type B PFFs. Vancouver type B PFFs with different fracture courses were randomly performed in 36 dried cadaveric femurs in which a femoral broach had previously been implanted. Radiographic images, taken in the coronal and sagittal views, were analysed by 5 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists who were asked to reproduce the fracture course and to evaluate stem stability. A scoring system was used to determine the injured femoral cortex correctly identified by the examiners. The identification of the fracture course was scored as poor in 52.4% and 56.%, fair in 23% and 23.4% and good in 24.6% and 19.8%, The identification of the fracture course in the coronal and axial vies radiographs was scored in coronal and axial view radiographs respectively. There was no significant difference in the average score obtained by senior and young examiners. In the coronal plane, the fracture course was poorly identified by all examiners in 11 (30.5%) femurs and by 5 or more examiners in 17 (47%). The fracture course was correctly identified by 5 or more examiners in 8 femurs (22%). A vertical fracture involving an emidiaphysis was found in 8 of the 11 femurs in which the PFF was poorly diagnosed by all examiners. Stem instability was correctly diagnosed in 45% of cases. In type B PFFs preoperative radiographs show a reduced diagnostic validity in identifying the fracture course and, hence, in planning a correct treatment. Potentially unstable vertical fractures involving an emidiaphysis are likely to be poorly diagnosed since most of the fracture course is hidden by the femoral stem. In cementless stems the diagnostic validity of radiographs in diagnosing between Vancouver type B1 and B2 seems to be lower than that reported for cemented stems.

Case Report and Literature Review of Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

We describe a case of periprosthetic femoral fracture with 5 major features of an atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and localized cortical thickening at the fracture site, which is characteristic of an AFF. An 81-year-old female patient had undergone cementless total hip arthroplasty for a right femoral neck fracture at the age of 66, and had been taking oral alendronate since then. At the age of 79, she developed spontaneous right thigh pain. Radiographs showed lateral cortical thickening and pedestal formation around the end of the femoral component. She was advised to discontinue oral alendronate and change to eldecalcitol. At the age of 81, she developed sudden severe pain when standing up from a seated position and was not able to walk. Radiographs showed a periprosthetic femoral fracture with 5 major features of AFF at the site of localized cortical thickening. We diagnosed a Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture. She underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with an NCB® Periprosthetic Femur Plate System with cable grips. Daily subcutaneous injection of teriparatide and low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy were performed to stimulate bone healing. She was able to walk without assistance at 4 months after ORIF. Radiographs showed adequate bridging callus and a disappearing fracture line. This case was diagnosed as a periprosthetic atypical femoral fracture (PAFF), because a periprosthetic fracture is excluded from the definition of AFF. Similar to AFF, PAFF exhibits poor clinical outcomes. The approach to treating PAFF should be decided after considering the pathogenesis.

Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of revision surgery for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prosthesis (solution prosthesis) with or without cortical strut allograft. A total of 34 patients with Vancouver type B2 PFFs who underwent revision hip arthroplasty using a posterolateral approach and received a solution prosthesis at our institution from December 2006 to January 2014 were retrospectively recruited. Patients were asked to assess their walking ability and pain status using a questionnaire. Limb function, pain, and physical and mental health were assessed using the Harris Hip score, University of California-Los Angeles score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, and Short Form-12 Health Survey score. Patients were also asked to rate their satisfaction with the surgery. Fracture union and stress shielding were assessed by radiography, and computed tomography was used to assess stem fixation. Single-photon emission computed tomography performed to assess radionuclide distribution in patients given cortical strut allografts. Patients were asked about their condition before PFF and evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually after surgery. Any complications during follow-up were recorded. Of the 34 patients, 29 completed follow-up. There was no significant difference in patient's health before PFF or at the last follow-up. Fracture union was achieved in all patients. Mild-to-moderate stress shielding occurred in three patients, and no patients exhibited femoral stem loosening or obvious subsidence. Radionuclides were concentrated in the cortical strut transplantation area, and the cortical strut was integrated with the host femur. The incidence of postoperative complications was low. Revision surgery using the solution prosthesis with or without cortical strut allograft is effective in treating Vancouver type B2 PFFs, with satisfactory mid- and long-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

Management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture by reversed contralateral distal femur locking plate

Management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture by reversed contralateral distal femur locking plate

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain one of the most challenging complications to address. Although the principal treatment modalities for Vancouver type B1 fractures are open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), surgeons have not yet reached a consensus on the optimal method for reduction and fixation. We therefore investigated whether minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking compression plate (LCP) would lead to favorable outcomes for patients with Vancouver type B1 PFFs. In addition, we also compared the outcomes of patients treated with MIPO to those treated with ORIF. MethodWe retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of 21 Vancouver type B1 PFFs treated with MIPO and LCP between February 2011 and February 2017. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.8 months. We also compared outcomes of these patients to those of patients with 19 Vancouver type B1 fractures treated with ORIF between April 2006 and December 2011. ResultsFracture healing without complications was achieved in 20 (95.2%) out of 21 cases in the MIPO group and in 14 (87.5%) out of 16 cases in the ORIF group. There was one case of fixation failure with stem subsidence in the MIPO group. In the ORIF group, there were 2 nonunion with metal failure. Operation time was significantly shorter and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIPO group compared to the ORIF group. However, there were no significant differences in frequency of transfusion, time-to-union, walking abilities, modified Harris hip score, or complications. ConclusionThe radiological and clinical outcomes of MIPO using LCP in patients with Vancouver type B1 PFFs were shown not to be inferior to ORIF and resulted in fewer intraoperative complications than ORIF. If care is taken regarding the stability of femoral implant and optimal surgical techniques, MIPO may be a recommended option in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture.

An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties

IntroductionThe incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties is increasing. Fractures around a stable implant stem (Vancouver type B1) are among the most common of these fractures. Various fixation strategies for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures have been reported in the literature; however, little high-level evidence exists. This study was designed to determine the current management strategies and opinions among orthopaedic surgeons treating Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures, and to evaluate the need for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for the management of these injuries. MethodsOrthopaedic surgeon members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), and the Hip Society were invited to participate in a 51-item web-based survey surrounding the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip replacements, as well as the perceived need for future research in this area. Responses were summarized using proportions, and further stratified by practice type, case volume, surgeon age, and fellowship training. ResultsFor Vancouver type B1 fractures, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locked plating was favoured slightly over ORIF with cable plating ± cortical strut allograft (51.1% versus 45.5%). When compared to cable plating with cortical strut allograft, respondents believed that isolated locked plating resulted in lower nonunion and reoperation rates, but similar infection and malunion rates. Subgroup analyses revealed that practice type, surgeon age, case volume, and fellowship training influenced surgeons’ management of periprosthetic femoral fractures and beliefs regarding complications. There is high demand for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for Vancouver type B1 fracture fixation. ConclusionsConsensus surrounding the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures is lacking, and there is a perceived need among orthopaedic surgeons for a large prospective randomized controlled trial in order to define the optimal management of these injuries.

Surgical treatments for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

Objective To investigate the outcomes of the treatments for the patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femur fractures. Methods Seventeen patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (5 males and 12 females; average age, 70.4 years, range from 37 to 86 years) who underwent revision arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation between December 2006 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Periprosthetic femoral fractures occurred at the mean time of 65.1 months after arthroplasty. Twelve patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation and five cases underwent total hip or stem revision with Solution from Depuy, Wagner from Zimmer, Echelon from Smith & Nephew or Secur-Fit Max from Stryker due to primary bone loss, acetabular component wear or long-time prosthesis use respectively. Data were collected at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and then each year postoperatively. All patients were followed up, and the results of X-ray, postoperative Harris hip score, stability of prosthesis and complications were also evaluated. Results A total of 5 patients underwent revision arthroplasty, and 12 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation. The mean follow-up duration was 56 months (range from 7 to 120 months). Total blood loss in the open reduction and internal fixation group and in revision group was 385±129 ml and 531±113 ml respectively. The operation duration in the open reduction and internal fixation group was 72±36 min while it was 126±48 min in the revision group. The postoperative Harris hip score in the open reduction and internal fixation group was significantly increased compared with preoperative Harris hip score (68.8±18.4 vs. 46.2±9.6), as well as in the revision group (75.0±8.9 vs. 57.4±13.0). For the incidence of complications, in the open reduction and internal fixation group, one patient suffer with delayed fracture union, one patient complained about persistent pain and one suffered a secondary fracture, while in the revision group one suffered from blood loss and one with long-term pain. Conclusion Open reduction and internal fixation is an optimal intervention for Vancouver B1 fracture, and revision arthroplasty can be considered as a safe alternative in patients with primary bone loss, implant of short survival time, severe liner wear or long-term prosthesis use. Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Periprosthetic fractures; Femoral fractures; Reoperation; Fracture fixation, internal

Clinical effect of cemented long stem prosthesis and memory alloy embracing fixator in the treatment of type B2 periprosthetic fractures

Objective To study the clinical effect of cemented long stem prosthesis and memory alloy embracing fixator in the treatment of type B2 periprosthetic fractures. Methods Fom April 2014 to April 2016, 102 cases of peripheral B2 periprosthetic fractures patients were selected and randomly divided into bone cement long stem prosthesis revision surgery(group A) and revision of cemented long stem prosthesis combined with memory alloy embracing fixator( group B), each group with 51 cases.Clinical efficacy was evaluated according to Beals and Tower criteria, used Harris score to evaluate the hip the joint function, used the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score to evaluate the pain, after follow-up of 40 months, the clinical curative effect of 2 groups of patients, fracture healing time, complications and Harris score and VAS score were observed. Results The excellent rate of B group was significantly higher than that of A group, with statistical significance(90.2% vs.72.5%, χ2=5.239, P<0.05). Fracture healing time of group B was shorter than that of group A, with statistically significant ((10.2±2.5) weeks vs.(21.3±8.9) weeks, t=8.575, P<0.05). Harris the score of group B was higher than the group A, with statistically significant((89.9±13.5) points vs.(71.2±18.9) points, t=5.750, P<0.05). VAS score of group B was significantly lower than the group A, with statistically significant((1.23±0.25) points vs.(5.98±1.08) points, t=30.600, P<0.05). There were no complications such as infection, nonunion, loss of reduction and loosening of internal fixation in the 2 groups. Conclusion Revision of cemented long stem prosthesis combined with memory alloy embracing fixator is an ideal methods for the treatment of type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, which provides a good initial stability for fracture healing. Key words: B2 periprosthetic fracture; Revision of cemented long stem prosthesis; Memory alloy embracing fixator; Clinical efficacy