Simple SummaryIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is an effective alternative for the ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) less than 2 cm, which is often poorly visible under unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or an ultrasound resulting in the difficulties of complete ablation. In this study, to achieve successful ablation on these small target HCCs with poor invisibility, the combination of transarterial ethiodized oil tumor marking with sequential computed tomography (CT)-guided IRE was performed. After marking, all 11 target-HCCs demonstrated complete visualization in post-marking CT, which were invisible in pre-marking CT. Technically successful ablation was achieved in all sequential IRE procedures. In the follow-up, no residual unablated tumor was observed and the two-year local tumor progression was 27.3%. Thus, ethiodized oil tumor marking with sequential CT-guided IRE is a safe and feasible combination to treat small HCC which was invisible in unenhanced CT.Introduction. To explore the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of ethiodized oil tumor marking combined with irreversible electroporation (IRE) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) that were invisible on unenhanced computed tomography (CT). Methods. A retrospective analysis of the institutional database was performed from January 2018 to September 2018. Patients undergoing ethiodized oil tumor marking to improve target-HCC visualization in subsequent CT-guided IRE were retrieved. Target-HCC visualization after marking was assessed, and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared between pre-marking and post-marking CT images using the paired t-test. Standard IRE reports, adverse events, therapeutic endpoints, and survival were summarized and assessed. Results. Nine patients with 11 target-HCCs (11.1–18.8 mm) were included. After marking, all target-HCCs demonstrated complete visualization in post-marking CT, which were invisible in pre-marking CT. Quantitatively, the SNR of the target-HCCs significantly increased after marking (11.07 ± 4.23 vs. 3.36 ± 1.79, p = 0.006), as did the CNR (4.32 ± 3.31 vs. 0.43 ± 0.28, p = 0.023). In sequential IRE procedures, the average current was 30.1 ± 5.3 A, and both the delta ampere and percentage were positive with the mean values of 5.8 ± 2.1 A and 23.8 ± 6.3%, respectively. All procedures were technically successful without any adverse events. In the follow-up, no residual unablated tumor (endpoint-1) was observed. The half-year, one-year, and two-year local tumor progression (endpoint-2) rate was 0%, 9.1%, and 27.3%. The two-year overall survival rate was 100%. Conclusions. Ethiodized oil tumor marking enables to demarcate small HCCs that were invisible on unenhanced CT. It potentially allows a safe and complete ablation in subsequent CT-guided IRE.
Read full abstract