Two-stent Technique Research Articles

Safety and feasibility of drug eluting and perfusion therapy for left main disease: JDEPTH-LM pilot study

Abstract Background Reducing cardiovascular events arising from ostial lesions of the left circumflex artery (LCx) remains an issue following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main disease (LMD). Despite expert consensus recommendation for the drug coated balloon (DCB) use to address it, there are concerns in using DCB following the standard practice of crossover-stenting from the left main trunk (LMT) to left anterior descending artery (LAD). Specifically, utilizing a DCB in isolation for the ostial LCx after stenting may result in additional carina shift. The combination of a conventional balloon for LMT-LAD and a DCB for LMT-LCx in KBT could potentially cause hemodynamical instability due to prolonged occlusion time for the entire left coronary artery system. Accordingly, we hypothesized the combined usage of DCB and perfusion balloon (PB) could provide a safe and effective approach for drug-eluting therapy in ostial LCx lesion. This approach aims to facilitate prolonged inflation while maintaining coronary blood flow during KBT for LMD. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of prolonged KBT with DCB and PB for LMD. Methods In this single-center prospective observational study, we enrolled patients of de-novo LMD with ostial LCx lesion, requiring crossover stenting for the LMT-LAD followed by conventional KBT (C-KBT). IVUS-guided procedure was mandated as per the study protocol. Following confirming the achievement of optimal left main PCI by IVUS, a double-effect KBT (W-KBT) was employed. This technique involved the use of a PB for the LMT-LAD and a DCB for the LMT-LCx, sized in a 1:1 ratio to the balloons used in C-KBT. Patients in cardiogenic shock, those requiring a two-stent technique for LMD, and individuals without achievement of TIMI3 flow in the LCx after C-KBT were excluded. The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as device delivery and balloon inflation time ≥30 sec. Secondary endpoints included the total balloon inflation time (W-KBT time), the incidence of ST-change cases, time to ST-change (ST-change time), changes in blood pressure and heart rate (delta BP and delta HR, respectively), and the frequency of inotrope usage following W-KBT. Results Between January 2023 and December 2023, 12 patients were included among 73 patients with LMD who underwent PCI during this study period. Mean age was 73.8±7.2 years (91.7% men) and median SYNTAX score was 29 (IQR: 26.3 to 34.5). The incidence of ACS was 8.3%. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of cases. The results of secondary endpoints were as follows: median W-KBT time: 60 sec (IQR: 60 to 60); the incidence of ST-change: 50% (no cases with ST-elevation); mean ST-change time: 41.2±7.1 sec; mean delta BP: -13.7±11.4 mmHg; mean delta HR: -3.4±5.9 bpm; and the use of inotrope: 0%. Conclusion Within the limited sample size of this pilot study, the safety and feasibility of the "first-in-man" technique of W-KBT were confirmed.Procedure of W-KBTStrength of W-KBT

Clinical outcomes of single- versus two-stent PCI technique in severely calcified true bifurcation lesions after rotational atherectomy.

Severely calcified coronary bifurcations complicate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and often necessitate dedicated lesion preparation. We compared the outcomes of single- versus two-stent techniques for treating heavily calcified true bifurcation lesions following rotational atherectomy (RA). Among patients receiving RA for severely calcified true bifurcations at a single center, 59 were treated with a single stent, and another 59 received two stents. We analyzed in-hospital adverse outcomes and 1-year rates of the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE), defined as cardiac death, target bifurcation myocardial infarction (TB-MI), or target bifurcation revascularization (TBR). The single-stent arm was associated with more in-hospital adverse outcomes (adj. OR, 6.13; 95% CI, 1.34-28.0; p = 0.019), driven by higher peri-procedural MI rates (18.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.043) and more side branch compromise (13.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.006). After 1year, both techniques had comparable 1-year BOCE (adj. HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.12-1.23; p = 0.106). We observed a significant interaction between the treatment technique and the presence of LM bifurcation (p interaction = 0.012), favoring single-stent technique in patients with non-LM bifurcations (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.68; p = 0.015). Notably, the single-stent technique had lower rates of TBR (2% vs. 15%, p log-rank = 0.026) after 1year. Patients with severely calcified true bifurcation lesions, treated with RA followed by a single stent implantation, had more in-hospital adverse outcomes compared to those treated with two stents. However, the superior outcomes of the two-stent technique did not translate into improved long-term results. In fact, the two-stent technique was even associated with higher rates of revascularization after 1year.

Five-year outcomes of double kissing mini-culotte stenting vs. mini-culotte stenting using drug-eluting stents for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions.

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of double kissing mini-culotte (DKMC) stenting with those of mini-culotte (MC) stenting in treating patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) in the clinical real world. This retrospective observational cohort study included 180 consecutive patients with true CBLs (Medina type 1,1,1; 1,0,1; 0,1,1). All eligible patients underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention with two-stent techniques in our hospital; among them, 97 received DKMC treatment and 83 MC treatment. The primary clinical endpoints were the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR). The secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis, in-stent restenosis, and individual components of MACE. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis (at 5 years) revealed that late lumen loss (0.25 ± 0.41 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.32 mm, P = 0.032) and segmental diameter restenosis of the side branch (27.84 ± 12.34% vs. 19.23 ± 9.76%, P = 0.016) were lower in the DKMC treatment group than that in the MC treatment group. Notably, compared to that in the MC treatment group, the cumulative event rate of MACE at 5 years (22.8% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.007) and TVR/TLR (17.7% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.018) was higher in the DKMC treatment group, driven mainly by TVR/TLR. Especially, the DKMC group was related to a significant reduction in the primary and secondary endpoints in high-risk patients. DKMC treatment was associated with less late lumen loss and restenosis in the side branch and a lower rate of cumulative MACE and TVR/TLR. DKMC treatment is more effective for treating true CBLs than MC treatment; however, these findings warrant further confirmation through a randomized clinical trial.

The impact of the bifurcation angle for the Nano-Crush two-stent coronary bifurcation technique on long-term outcomes in a real-world clinical population

AimThis study aims to assess the direct impact of bifurcation angle (BA) on immediate procedural outcomes and patient prognosis post-Nano-Crush stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted for all consecutive patients treated with the Nano-Crush technique across two high-volume interventional centers from January 2020 to October 2022. Primary endpoint: comparison of target lesion failure rate in two cohorts based on bifurcation angle (<70° vs. ≥70°), with secondary endpoints including side branch ostium coverage, rate of successful final kissing balloon inflation (FKBI), need for conversion to another technique, and procedure length. ResultsBaseline demographics included 71 patients in the BA<70° group and 49 in the BA≥70° group, with well-balanced characteristics. Angiographic characteristics revealed similar trends, including anatomic and morphological lesion characteristics (referencing Syntax score, Medina classification, and presence of calcifications). Both groups predominantly had complex coronary disease, with a baseline mean Syntax score of 24.18 ± 8.19 in the BA<70° group and 23.91 ± 7.29 in the BA≥70° group, respectively. A dedicated debulking device for lesion preparation was used in 25.35 % of patients in the first group and in 28.57 % of patients in the second group.The primary endpoint occurred in 5.63 % of patients in the BA<70° group and in 4.08 % of patients in the BA≥70° group (P = 0.7014) after ≥ 2 years of clinical follow-up. Angiographic success was achieved in 100 % of both groups, with procedural time averaging 74.99 ± 25.55 min in the BA≥70° and 76.94 ± 27.81 min in the BA<70° (P = 0.6922). The rate of successful final kissing balloon inflation was 98.59 % in the BA<70° group and 95.91 % in the BA≥70° group (P = 0.3566). The mean contrast volume was 189.54 ± 73.74 ml in BA<70° and 168.9 ± 62.77 ml in BA≥70° (P = 0.1126). Clinical follow-ups at 30 days and 2 years revealed similar outcomes and complications for each group, as summarized in Table 3. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that the bifurcation angle does not significantly impact long-term clinical outcomes or procedural parameters, such as side branch ostium coverage, conversion to a modified DK Crush technique, FKBI success rate, and procedure length. These findings suggest that the Nano-Crush technique can be a viable option for bifurcation lesions, irrespective of the bifurcation angle, achieving optimal side branch ostium coverage while preventing excessive protrusion into the main vessel.

Long-Term Results of Stenting in Patients with Hemodynamically Significant Lesions of the Left Main Coronary Artery

The aim. To study the long-term results of stenting in patients with coronary artery disease with hemodynamically significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenoses.&#x0D; Materials and methods. The study included 67 patients (56 men, 11 women) with a mean age of 63 ± 2.1 years.&#x0D; Results. Among the 67 patients included in the study, 29 patients (43.3%) underwent percutaneous coronary inter-vention using a single-stent technique. These were patients with ostial LMCA lesions, lesions of the middle third of the LMCA and some patients with Medina 1.1.0; 1.0.1; 1.0.0; 0.1.0; 0.0.1 lesions of the distal part of the LMCA. The median follow-up was 2 years. Using a questionnaire, we managed to establish contact with 25 patients (86.2%). Among these, 1 patient (3.4%) died of non-cardiac causes and 7 patients (24.1%) had a recurrence of angina within 2 years. The causes of angina recurrence in 2 cases (6.9%) were restenosis in the stent with transition to the mouth of the side branch, which required repeated stenting of the LMCA with transition to the left circumflex artery. In 5 patients (17.2%), angina recur-rence was associated with progression of coronary atherosclerosis of another localization.&#x0D; Among 67 patients with LMCA stenting, the two-stent technique was used in 38 patients (56.7%). These were pa-tients with Medina 1.1.0; 1.0.1; 1.0.0; 0.1.0; 0.0.1 lesions of the distal part of the LMCA. The median follow-up was 2 years. Using a questionnaire, we managed to contact 35 patients (92.1%). Among these, 4 patients (10.5%) died, but only one of them due to cardiac causes (2.6%), and 3 patients (7.9%) had recurrent angina within 2 years, two of whom underwent stenting by the T and protrusion (TAP) technique and one by culotte. The first two patients underwent angioplasty of restenosis in stents using balloons with a therapeutic coating. In the last patient, stent recoil in the left circumflex artery mouth was observed due to severe calcification, so this patient underwent re-implantation of the stent system in the recoil zone.&#x0D; Conclusions. The problem of choosing a method of revascularization for patients with hemodynamically significant LMCA lesions remains controversial to this day, despite the wide range of evidence. Doctors should jointly decide on the choice of treatment methodology solely in the interests of the patient, taking into account all the factors that may affect the patient’s quality of life in the long term.

Novel planned two-stent technique for bifurcation lesions: Inverted compression T-stenting.

Novel planned two-stent technique for bifurcation lesions: Inverted compression T-stenting.

Percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease - temporal trends from large registry and ten-year follow-up. a single centre experience

Abstract Background Due to a large amount of jeopardized myocardium, patients with significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis have an increased risk of death. For years coronary artery bypass grafting has been considered as the treatment of choice. Recent years brought evidence that led to the reconsideration of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a valuable alternative. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess temporal trends in clinical practice and analyse the very long-term outcomes of LMCA PCI in a large tertiary hospital in Poland. Methods Group of 998 individuals undergoing LMCA PCI was selected from medical records of 44,989 patients hospitalized in years 2008-2021. Data on mortality were obtained from the Centre for Information Technology. Temporal trends were calculated for period 2008-2014 as compared to 2015-2021. The 10-year event rate was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator, univariate (ULR), and multivariate logistic regression (MLR). Results The rate of LMCA PCI increased from 2.21% in 2008 to 6.88% in 2021 (p&amp;lt;0.001). 736 (73.8%) patients were male, the median age was 71 years (interquartile range 16). 409 (41.0%) of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 545 (54.6%) with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). In the analysed periods concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) rate increased from 27.44% to 42.5% (p&amp;lt;0.001), use of intravascular imaging (IVI) increased from 22.28% to 42.72% (p&amp;lt;0.001), use of rotational atherectomy increased from 8.36% to 18.94% (p&amp;lt;0.001). The 30-day mortality decreased from 10.31% to 4.23% (p&amp;lt;0.001), and 1-year mortality decreased from 18.66% to 12.05% (p=0.007). In the 10-year follow-up 399 (40.0%) patients died. In ULR, death was associated with femoral access (OR 1.766, 95% CI 1.308-2.386) and absorbed radiation dose (OR for increase in 1 Gy 1.192, 95% CI 1.080-1.304). The provisional stenting yielded better performance than two-stent techniques (OR 0.635, 95% CI 0.491-0.821). In MLR, death at 10 years was associated with age (OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.007-1.050), ACS (OR 1.725, 95% CI 1.134-2.624), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.540, 95% CI 1.002-2.367), lower glomerular filtration rate (OR for decrease in 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 1.011, 95% CI 1.001-1.022), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (OR for decrease in 1% 1.045, 95% CI 1.029-1.060). Better outcomes were associated with previous revascularization (OR 0.668, 95% CI 0.453-0.986), use of IVI (OR 0.518, 95% CI 0.353-0.759), drug-eluting stents (OR 0.238, 95% CI 0.106-0.536) and bigger balloon diameter used for stent optimization (OR for increase in 1 mm 0.889, 95% CI 0.801-0.986). Conclusions In the analysed period the rate of LMCA PCI, number of complex procedures, and co-morbidities increased, yet the prognosis has improved. The 10-year death rate analysis revealed that advancements in percutaneous device technology and procedural techniques are associated with more favourable outcomes.

The impact of left circumflex coronary artery ostium stenosis on outcomes for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease.

The impact of left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) ostium atherosclerosis in left main coronary artery (LM) bifurcation disease is not well-known. The study aimed to assess whether the involvement of LCX ostium carries prognostic implications in patients undergoing unprotected LM percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Consecutive 564 patients with unprotected LM (ULMCA) disease who underwent LM PCI between January 2015 and February 2021, with at least 1 year of available follow-up were included in the study. The first group was composed of 145 patients with ULMCA disease with LCX ostium stenosis, and the second group consisted of 419 patients with ULMCA disease without LCX ostium stenosis. Patients in the group with ULMCA disease with LCX ostium stenosis were significantly older and had more comorbidities. The two-stent technique was used more often in the group with LCX ostium stenosis (62.8% vs. 14.6%; P <0.001). During 7-year follow-up, all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between groups with and without LCX ostium stenosis (P = 0.50). The use of one-stent or two-stent technique also did not impact mortality in patients with LCX ostial lesions (P = 0.75). Long-term mortality subanalysis for three groups of patients: (1) patients with LM plus LCX ostium stenosis; (2) LM plus left anterior descending artery (LAD) ostium stenosis; (3) LM plus LCX ostium plus LAD ostium stenosis also did not differ significantly (P = 0.63). LCX ostium involvement in LM disease PCI is not associated with adverse long-term outcomes, which is highly beneficial for the Heart Team's decision-making process.

Configuration of two-stent coronary bifurcation techniques in explanted beating hearts: the MOBBEM study.

In patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), various 2-stent techniques might be utilised. The Visible Heart Laboratories (VHL) offer an experimental environment where PCI results can be assessed by multimodality imaging. We aimed to assess the post-PCI stent configuration achieved by 2-stent techniques in the VHL and to evaluate the procedural factors associated with suboptimal results. Bifurcation PCI with 2-stent techniques, performed by expert operators in the VHL on explanted beating swine hearts, was studied. The adopted bifurcation PCI strategy and the specific procedural steps applied in each procedure were classified according to Main, Across, Distal, Side (MADS)-2 and to their adherence to the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) recommendations. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) was used to assess the post-PCI stent configuration. The primary endpoint was "suboptimal stent implantation", defined as acomposite of stent underexpansion (<90%), side branch ostial area stenosis >50% and the gap between stents. Atotal of 82 PCI with bifurcation stenting were assessed, comprised of 29 crush, 25 culotte, 28 T/T and small protrusion (TAP) techniques. Suboptimal stent implantation was observed in as many as 53.7% of the cases, regardless of baseline anatomy or the stenting strategy. However, less frequent use of the proximal optimisation technique (POT; p=0.015) and kissing balloon inflations (KBI; p=0.027) and no adherence to EBC recommendations (p=0.004, p multivariate=0.006) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. Commonly practised bifurcation 2-stent techniques may result in imperfect stent configurations. More frequent use of POT/KBI and adherence to expert recommendations might reduce the occurrence of post-PCI suboptimal stent configurations.

Six-months clinical and intracoronary imaging follow-up after reverse T and protrusion or double-kissing and crush stenting for the treatment of complex left main bifurcation lesions.

There is a debate regarding the best stent strategy for unprotected distal left main (LM) bifurcation disease. Among two-stent techniques, double-kissing and crush (DKC) is favored in current guidelines but is complex and requires expertise. Reverse T and Protrusion (rTAP) was shown to be a comparable strategy regarding short-term efficacy and safety, but with reduced procedural complexity. To compare rTAP vs. DKC by optical coherence tomography (OCT) on the intermediate term. 52 consecutive patients with complex unprotected LM stenoses (Medina 0,1,1 or 1,1,1) were randomized to either DKC or rTAP and followed-up for a median of 189[180-263] days for clinical and OCT outcomes. At follow-up OCT showed similar change in the side branch (SB) ostial area (primary endpoint). The confluence polygon showed a higher percentage of malapposed stent struts in the rTAP group that did not reach statistical significance (rTAP: 9.7[4.4-18.3] % vs. DKC: 3[0.07-10.9] %; p = 0.064). It also showed a trend towards larger neointimal area relative to the stent area (DKC: 8.8 [6.9 to 13.4] % vs. rTAP: 6.5 [3.9 to 8.9] %; p = 0.07), and smaller luminal area (DKC: 9.54[8.09-11.07] mm2 vs. rTAP: 11.21[9.53-12.42] mm²; p = 0.09) in the DKC group. The minimum luminal area in the parent vessel distal to the bifurcation was significantly smaller in the DKC group (DKC: 4.64 [3.64 to 5.34] mm² vs. rTAP: 6.76 [5.20 to 7.29] mm²; p = 0.03). This segment also showed a trend for smaller stent areas (p = 0.05 to 0.09), and a bigger neointimal area relative to the stent area (DKC: 8.94 [5.43 to 10.5]% vs. rTAP: 4.75 [0.08 to 8.5]%; p = 0.06) in the DKC patients. The incidence of clinical events was comparably low in both groups. At 6-months, OCT showed a similar change in the SB ostial area (primary endpoint) in rTAP compared to DKC. There was also a trend for smaller luminal areas in the confluence polygon and the distal parent vessel, and a larger neointimal area relative to the stent area, in DKC, along with a tendency for more malapposed stent struts in rTAP. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03714750, identifier: NCT03714750.

Unprotected Left Main Bifurcation Stenting in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Two-Stent Technique versus One-Stent Technique.

There is little evidence guiding the choice between a one-stent and a two-stent approach in unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease (UDLMCAD) presenting as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aim to compare these two techniques in an unselected ACS group. We conducted a single center retrospective observational study, that included all patients with UDLMCAD and ACS undergoing PCI between 2014 and 2018. Group A underwent PCI with a one-stent technique (n = 41, 58.6%), Group B with a two-stent technique (n = 29, 41.4%). A total of 70 patients were included, with a median age of 63 years, including n = 12 (17.1%) with cardiogenic shock. There were no differences between Group A and B in terms of patient characteristics, including SYNTAX score (median 23). The 30-day mortality was 15.7% overall, and was lower in Group B (3.5% vs. 24.4%, p = 0.02). Mortality rate at 4 years was significantly lower in Group B (21.4% vs. 44%), also when adjusted in a multivariable regression model (HR 0.26, p = 0.01). In our study, patients with UDLMCAD and ACS undergoing PCI using a two-stent technique had lower early and midterm mortality compared to one-stent approach, even after adjusting for patient-related or angiographic factors.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Disease: A Single-Center Study

Background: Hemodynamically significant unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease is a high-risk clinical condition because of the large area of myocardium at risk, and it requires prompt revascularization. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an appropriate alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for revascularization of unprotected LM disease in patients with low-to-intermediate anatomic complexity or when the patient refuses CABG after adequate counseling by the heart team. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 201 patients receiving left main (LM) provisional one-stent or two-stent procedures, and we assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing unprotected LM PCI. Results: The mean age was 66.5 ± 9.9 years, and 72% were male. The majority of the subjects presented several cardiovascular risk factors, among which arterial hypertension (179 patients, 89.5%) and dyslipidemia (173 patients, 86.5%) were the most frequent. Out of all patients, 162 (81.8%) underwent revascularization by using the one-stent technique, while the two-stent technique was used in 36 patients (18.2%). The median value of fractional flow reserve (FFR) of the side branch was 0.9 [0.85-0.95], and 135 patients (67.1%) showed a value of FFR > 0.8. One hundred nine patients (54.2%) had a stent enhancement side branch length (SESBL) > 2, with median values of 2.5 mm2 [2.1-3]. Regarding angiographic parameters, the LM area as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the grade of stenosis as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were similar between groups. However, patients who required revascularization by using the two-stent technique presented more frequently with intermediate rather than low SYNTAX scores (69.4% vs. 28.4%, p < 0.0001). Also, the same group required kissing balloon inflation (KBI) more frequently (69.4% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding the success of revascularization between the use of the one-stent or two-stent technique. FFR was able to predict a SESBL > 2 mm. The cut-off value for FFR to afford the highest degree of sensitivity (74.5%) and specificity (47%) for a SESBL > 2 was >0.86, indicating a moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI 0.525-0.690, p = 0.036). Conclusions: Unprotected left main PCI is a safe and effective revascularization option amongst a complex and morbid population. There were no differences regarding the success of revascularization between the use of the one-stent or two-stent technique, and there was no significant impact of KBI on side branch FFR measurements but lower side branch FFR values were correlated with angiographic side branch compromise.

Dynamic assessment of the left main-left circumflex bending angle: Implications for ostial left circumflex artery in-stent restenosis after successful two-stent PCI

BackgroundTwo-stent techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on left main (LM) bifurcation (LMB) lesions are associated with an increased risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) at left circumflex artery (LCx) ostium but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. This study sought to investigate the association between cyclic change of LM-LCx bending angle (BALM-LCx) and the risk of ostial LCx ISR following two-stent techniques. MethodsIn a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing two-stent PCI for LMB lesions, BALM-LCx and distal bifurcation angle (DBA) were computed with 3-dimensional angiographic reconstruction. The analysis was performed both at end-diastole and end-systole, and the angulation change throughout the cardiac cycle was defined as the cardiac motion-induced angulation change (∆CAngle). ResultsA total of 101 patients were included. The mean pre-procedural BALM-LCx was 66.8 ± 16.1° at end-diastole and 54.1 ± 13.3° at end-systole with a range of 13.0 ± 7.7°. Pre-procedural ∆CBALM-LCx > 16.4° was the most relevant predictor of ostial LCx ISR (adjusted OR 11.58, 95% CI 4.04–33.19; p < 0.001). Post-procedural ∆CBALM-LCx > 9.8° and stent-induced diastolic BALM-LCx change > 11.6° were also related with ostial LCx ISR. DBA was positively correlated with BALM-LCx and showed a weaker association of pre-procedural ∆CDBA > 14.5° with ostial LCx ISR (adjusted OR 6.87, 95% CI 2.57–18.37; p < 0.001). ConclusionsThree-dimensional angiographic bending angle is a feasible and reproducible novel method for LMB angulation measurement. A large pre-procedural cyclic change of BALM-LCx was associated with an increased risk of ostial LCx ISR following two-stent techniques.

One-stent Versus Two-stent Techniques for Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcational Lesions: Early and Late Outcomes

Background and aim: Left main disease account for 3% to 5% of the coronary lesions. PCI on coronary bifurcation lesions is considered a challenge for any cardiologist. These lesions include a wide spectrum of anatomic complexity varying from simple lesions, which can be managed with a single stent, to complex lesions necessitating more complex procedures. The goal of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of PCI with single-stent vs. double-stent implantation for the management of ULMCA distal bifurcation lesions. Patients and methods: a total of 60 cases with ULMCA distal bifurcation lesions eligible for PCI were included in the current study. Cases were divided into 2 main groups: one-stent group (20 cases) and two-stents group (40 cases). All patients underwent follow up during hospitalization and post-discharge at 1 and 6 months. Results: Comparison between the study groups as regards the lesional and angiographic characteristics demonstrated that cases in the one-stent group had significantly lower SYNTAX score (21.70 ± 5.58 versus 24.88 ± 4.93, p=0.028) and lower frequency of true bifurcation lesion (65.0 % versus 100.0 %, p0.001) and higher frequency of 1,1.0 Median class (55.0 % versus 7.5 %, p0.001). Besides, both groups had similar early post-interventional outcomes including hematoma and used target vessel revascularization techniques. Also, no significant differences were reported between both groups as regards the 6-month outcome parameters including cardiac death, TV MI, TVR and TL failure. Conclusions: Both single-stent and two-stents techniques are technically feasible and safe techniques for management of ULMCA with comparable outcomes.

Bifurcation lesions in the context of a PCI CTO - insight from Belgrade single center CTO registry

Background/Aim. Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the coronary artery are still one of the most complex procedures in the treatment of coronary arteries. If there is a bifurcation lesion within the CTO, it is certainly one of the biggest challenges for interventional cardiologists. Methods. We present a retrospective analysis of patients from our center who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a bifurcation lesion within the CTO and a side branch with a diameter of 2 mm or more from January 2017 to December 2020. Results. Out of the total 216 patients in the four-year period, 38 (18%) had a bifurcation lesion within the CTO. The most common bifurcation lesions (50%) were on the left anterior descending artery, and the least frequent (21%) on the circumflex coronary artery. CTO recanalization was successful in 35 (92%) patients. The one-stent technique was used in 27 (77%) patients, while the two-stent technique was used in 8 (23%) patients. Conclusion. Bifurcation lesions in the context of PCI CTOs are a relatively common finding in coronary angiography and represent a special challenge for CTO operators. The provisional technique (one-stent technique) is the most common strategy for the treatment of bifurcation lesions in patients with CTO.

Left main calcified lesion treated with orbital atherectomy and two-stent double-kissing Culotte technique in a very elderly patient with frailty syndrome.

Left main calcified lesion treated with orbital atherectomy and two-stent double-kissing Culotte technique in a very elderly patient with frailty syndrome.

Percutaneous coronary artery intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: one-year outcome Egyptian registry

BackgroundLeft main coronary artery lesions are associated with jeopardy of an outsized area of the myocardium, causing a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment of coronary bifurcation anatomy remains highly debatable, whether by provisional or two-stent technique. This prospective observational study was designed to investigate the one-year clinical outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery disease revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention in a “real-world” setting among Egyptian patients in a prospective single-center registry (at Ain Shams University Hospitals).ResultsThis study included 163 patients who underwent PCI to LM lesions between May 1, 2020, and the end of April in Ain Shams University hospitals. Patients were dichotomized into two groups according to their intended stenting technique, whether provisional or two-stent technique. A total of 142 underwent provisional stenting while 21 were designated for the two-stent technique, mainly DK crush (double kissing). Among the patients with intended provisional stenting, 34 patients underwent the TAP technique. Patients were followed up for the primary endpoints, at the in-hospital setting, at 30 days, and after 1 year. In-hospital death was encountered in 6.34% of cases undergoing provisional stenting, among which 5.36% were due to a cardiovascular cause. Total MACCE was found to be 2.96% in the provisional stenting group versus 4.76% in the two-stent group. Overall, MACCE at 1 year was found to be 22.31% in the provisional group and 30% in the two-stent group (p-value0.57). TVF was recognized in 10% of cases treated by provisional stenting and 30% of cases treated by the two-stent technique (p-value 0.023).ConclusionsLM coronary artery lesions treatment by PCI is considered a safe and beneficial solution. Provisional stenting is the preferred approach bearing in mind that bail-out procedures may be sought in case the SB needs further treatment. Adjunctive assessment by IVUS or FFR may help achieve better outcomes, and efforts should be performed to facilitate their feasibility.

Techniques and Evidence for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: An Ongoing Journey

Techniques and Evidence for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: An Ongoing Journey

3-Year Outcomes After 2-Stent With Provisional Stenting for Complex Bifurcation Lesions Defined by DEFINITION Criteria.

The multicenter and randomized DEFINITION II (Two-Stent vs Provisional Stenting Techniques for Patients With Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial showed less 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) after a 2-stent approach for complex coronary bifurcation lesions compared with provisional stenting (PS). The authors report the 3-year clinical outcome of the DEFINITION II trial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the difference in TLF at 3 years after a planned 2-stent approach vs PS for complex coronary bifurcation lesions stratified by DEFINITION (Definitions and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents) criteria. A total of 653 patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions were randomly assigned to either the 2-stent group or the PS group in the DEFINITION II trial and were followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of TLF at 3 years. Stent thrombosis was the safety endpoint. At 3 years, TLF had occurred in 52 patients (16.0%) in the PS group and in 34 (10.4%) patients in the 2-stent group (HR: 0.63; 95%CI: 0.41-0.97; P=0.035), driven mainly by increased target vessel myocardial infarction (8.0% vs 3.7%; HR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.23-0.89; P=0.022) and target lesion revascularization (8.3% vs 4.3%; HR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.26-0.96; P=0.038). There was no difference in TLF between the 2 groups between year 1 and year3. For patients with complex coronary bifurcations who reach 1-year postprocedure without experiencing endpoint events, there is still a risk for future events. The type of procedure performed initially is no longer a future event risk determinant. (Two-Stent vs Provisional Stenting Techniques for Patients With Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions; NCT02284750).

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic patients of the mini-crush two-stent technique for percutaneous treatment of complex coronary artery bifurcation lesions

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Diabetic patients present more aggressive coronary artery disease and worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Currently, the benefit of "double stenting" techniques in the treatment of complex bifurcations in diabetics with coronary artery disease, is controversial. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of PCI with "mini-crush" two-stent technique in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, in terms of MACE: cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis after long follow-up (median 32 months). Methods Observational study in which were included 152 consecutive patients (mean age 69.5 years, 38.3% diabetics) with 152 complex bifurcated coronary severe lesions that underwent PCI from April 2014 to April 2020. Results No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics, clinical presentation and antiplatelet pretreatment between both groups. Clopidogrel was the P2Y12-receptor inhibitor most commonly used. There were no differences in mean complexity according to the Syntax score (29.7 ± 11.3 in diabetics vs 30.4 ± 14.4 in non-diabetics, p=0.293). Left main bifurcation was the most frequently coronary artery affected in both groups and circumflex was the most common side vessel. The characteristics of the procedure was similar in both groups: no differences observed in pre-dilation rate either in final kissing balloon post-dilation rate. Similar length and diameter of the stents implanted in both groups. Angiographic follow-up clinically guided was 15.8% in diabetics and 16.9% in non-diabetics. We found no significant differences in the incidence of MACE or in any of its components separately. TLR rate was similar in diabetics and non-diabetics patients. Conclusions Comparable to non-diabetic patients, PCI in complex coronary bifurcation lesions with "mini-crush" two-stent technique in diabetic patients shows favorable results with low event rates and need for revascularization at long-term follow-up.