Two-stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Research Articles

Longitudinal analysis of long-term outcomes of abdominal flap-based microsurgical reconstruction and two-stage prosthetic reconstruction

Two-stage tissue expander/implant (TE/I) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the two main pillars of breast reconstruction. This study aimed to conduct a longitudinal analysis of long-term outcomes after immediate DIEP- and TE/I-based reconstruction. This retrospective cohort study included patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate DIEP- or TE/I-based reconstruction between 2012 and 2017. The cumulative incidence of major complications, defined as unplanned reoperation/readmission due to complications, was analyzed by the reconstruction modality and its independent association. In total, 1,474 cases (1,162 TE/I and 312 DIEP cases) were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 58 months. The 5-year cumulative incidence of major complications was significantly higher in the TE/I group (10.3% vs. 4.7%). On the multivariable analyses, the use of DIEP flap was associated with a significantly reduced risk of major complications compared to that of TE/I. A more prominent association was observed in the analysis of patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy. Restricting analysis to those who received adjuvant chemotherapy revealed no differences between the two groups. The rate of reoperation/readmission for improving aesthetic outcomes was similar in the two groups. Long-term risks for unexpected reoperation/readmission may differ between DIEP- and TE/I-based immediate reconstruction.

Association of Fat Graft with Breast Cancer Recurrence in Implant-Based Reconstruction: Does the Timing Matter?

In two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction, autologous fat graft (AFG) is often conducted simultaneously with the second-stage operation, which is usually performed shortly after mastectomy. There is a paucity of studies evaluating whether conducting AFG early, with a relatively short interval from the primary operation, is oncologically safe. This study aimed to evaluate potential associations of AFG with breast cancer prognosis, focusing on its timing. Patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent immediate two-stage prosthetic reconstruction following mastectomy between 2011 and 2016 were identified. They were categorized into two groups by whether AFG was performed during the second-stage operation. Cumulative incidence of oncologic events was compared between the two groups, after stratifying patients by the time interval between mastectomy and the second-stage operation (≤ 12 months vs. > 12 months). Of 267 cases that met the selection criteria, 203 underwent the second-stage operation within 12 months of mastectomy. AFG was performed for 112 cases and was not performed in 91 cases. The two groups showed similar baseline characteristics including tumor stage and adjuvant treatments. Compared with the control, AFG was associated with lower locoregional recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival, and this difference remained significant after adjusting for other variables including tumor stage. In the 64 cases undergoing the operation after 12 months following mastectomy, oncologic outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Our results suggest that AFG timing in relation to mastectomy may be associated with risks for breast cancer recurrence.

Predictors for Implant Rupture in Two-Stage Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Two-stage tissue expander/implant-based method has been used predominantly for breast reconstruction. Implant rupture is one of the bothersome complications, inducing additional morbidity including reoperation. The present study aimed to identify the independent factors associated with development of implant rupture. Patients who underwent immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2016 were reviewed. Inserted implants were followed up using magnetic resonance imaging every 2 years and/or ultrasound/computed tomography scans every 6 or 12 months that were conducted for cancer surveillance. Associations of perioperative and intraoperative variables with the development of implant rupture were evaluated. In total, 797 cases (744 patients) were analyzed. During a median follow-up of 43months after second-stage operation, implant rupture was identified in 22 cases. The 5-year cumulative incidence was 3.1%. Multivariable analyses showed that the interval between the first- and second-stage operations was inversely associated with the risk of implant rupture. Maximal discrimination was observed at the interval of 6.5months. Cases with an interval ≤6 months were associated with higher risks for implant rupture than those with ≥7 months, after adjusting for other variables. Type of implant was associated with the development of implant rupture, showing that using two kinds of fourth-generation implant (Allergan Biocell textured round and Allergan smooth round implants) was associated with a significantly increased risk of implant rupture compared with that of Mentor MemoryShape implants (fifth-generation implant). Several operation-related variables appear to be associated with implant rupture in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction.

Inlay graft of acellular dermal matrix to prevent incisional dehiscence after radiotherapy in prosthetic breast reconstruction.

BackgroundAs the indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy expand, innovative solutions are required to reduce operative complications and reconstructive failure after prosthetic breast reconstruction. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) inlay grafts in preventing postoperative wound dehiscence of irradiated breasts in the context of prosthetic breast reconstruction.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of 45 patients who received two-stage prosthetic reconstruction and radiotherapy following mastectomy. An ADM graft was placed beneath the incisional site during the second-stage operation in 19 patients using marionette sutures, whereas the control group did not receive the ADM reinforcement. Patient demographics and complications such as wound dehiscence, capsular contracture, peri-prosthetic infection, cellulitis, and seroma were compared between the two groups.ResultsDuring an average follow-up period of 37.1 months, wound dehiscence occurred significantly less often in the ADM-reinforced closure group (0%) than in the non-ADM group (23.1%) (P=0.032). There was no significant difference between the two groups in relation to other complications, such as capsular contracture, postoperative infection, or seroma.ConclusionsThe ADM inlay graft is a simple and easily reproducible technique for preventing incisional dehiscence in the setting of radiotherapy after prosthetic breast reconstruction. The ADM graft serves as a buttress to offload tension during healing and provides a mechanical barrier against pathogens. Application of this technique may serve to reduce complications in prosthetic breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.

Breast reconstruction in previously irradiated patients using tissue expanders and implants: a potentially unfavorable result.

There exists a paucity of definitive information on the suitability of implant reconstructions in previously irradiated breast cancer patients. This controversial topic prompted a review of our prosthetic reconstructions in this select group of patients. A retrospective study of patients treated between 1976 and 1993 with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for early breast cancer revealed 67 patients with local recurrences. Nine of these patients (10 breasts) underwent a two-stage prosthetic reconstruction following a salvage mastectomy. The average age was 47.9 years. The mean dose of irradiation was 6,070 cGy. The average interval from radiation therapy to placement of a tissue expander was 4.6 years. In one patient (10%) the tissue expander extruded. The average follow-up for 8 patients (9 breasts) who underwent exchange to a permanent prosthesis was 5.1 years. In four reconstructions (40%) there was an uneventful postoperative course. Two cases (20%) were difficult to expand and the final result lacked projection. One patient (10%) developed an infection requiring removal of the permanent prosthesis. Two patients (20%) developed Baker class III or IV capsular contractures. Overall, in our group of 10 implant reconstructions, 60% of the patients resulted in either a complication or an unfavorable result.