Two-sided Log-rank Test Research Articles

Quantitative assessment of residual tumor is a strong and independent predictor of survival in methylated glioblastoma following radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ.

Maximum tumor resection improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma. The extent of resection (EOR) is historically dichotomized. The RANO resect group recently proposed criteria for volumetry-based EOR assessment in patients that were treated according to Stupp´s protocol. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate the prognostic value of EOR in patients receiving combined chemotherapy with lomustine (CCNU)/temozolomide (TMZ), and (2) to analyse the prognostic performance of binary EOR assessment compared to volumetric assessment. 78 patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-methylated GBM undergoing tumor resection followed by radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ were included in this study. Residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor volume after the first resection was measured and its influence on OS and PFS was analysed using uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis as well as two-sided log rank test. Patients were divided into RTV ≤1 cm³, >1 cm³ - ≤5 cm³ and >5 cm³ following the proposed criteria of the RANO resect group. Prolonged OS was associated with age <60 years, low RTV, and gross total resection (GTR). Residual tumor volume (RTV) had a superior prognostic value compared to binary EOR assessment. Patients with total or near total resection of CE tumor (≤1 cm³ RTV) showed prolonged OS (median 54.4 months, 95% CI 46.94-not reached), with a 5-year survival rate of 49%. Low RTV is associated with increased survival in glioblastoma patients undergoing radiochemotherapy with CCNU/TMZ. This study demonstrates the applicability of the recently proposed RANO resect criteria in this subgroup of patients.

MDB-86. ISOTRETINOIN HAS NO EFFECT ON EVENT FREE SURVIVAL ACROSS HIGH-RISK MEDULLOBLASTOMA MOLECULAR SUBGROUPS WHEN ADDED TO MAINTENANCE CHEMOTHERAPY: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP ACNS0332 DATA

Abstract BACKGROUND Medulloblastoma has been redefined into four molecular subgroups (WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4), with distinct prognoses and responses to treatment. The ACNS0332 trial investigated the impact of carboplatin and isotretinoin in high-risk medulloblastoma finding a differential effect of carboplatin by molecular subgroup. An interim futility analysis showed no benefit from isotretinoin, but did not evaluate results by molecular subgroup in the primary analysis. We performed a secondary analysis to examine whether the effect of isotretinoin on event-free survival (EFS) differed by molecular subgroup. METHODS Evaluable patients with known molecular subgroups were analyzed. Molecular subgroup analysis was conducted retrospectively in 231 patients at a central laboratory by methylation array. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis compared EFS (time from enrollment to disease progression or recurrence, second malignancy, death from any cause, or to date of last follow-up for patients without events). RESULTS Based on data from the 2014 interim analysis, 164 patients were eligible for secondary analyses. Group 3 (n=56, 34.1%) and Group 4 (n=75, 45.7%) were the most common groups. SHH (n=22, 13.4%) and WNT (n=11, 6.7%) groups were less common. There was no difference in isotretinoin (p=0.87) or carboplatin (p=0.49) randomization by subgroup. Race was well-balanced with expected differences in age (p=0.017) and sex (p=0.016) among molecular subgroups. Based on the interim analysis, there was no evidence of a difference in EFS by isotretinoin randomization (p=0.34; one-sided log-rank test stratified by carboplatin randomization). Based on secondary analysis data, there was no difference in EFS between patients receiving isotretinoin or no additional therapy in any molecular subgroup: Group 3 (p=0.68), Group 4 (p=0.55), SHH (p=0.68), WNT (p=1) based on two-sided log-rank tests. CONCLUSIONS Despite differential efficacy of carboplatin among molecular subgroups, no difference was found in EFS between patients receiving isotretinoin and those who did not, regardless of molecular subgroup.

EPEN-29. IS THE OUTCOME OF SUPRATENTORIAL EPENDYMOMA WITH ZFTA FUSION REALLY POOR?

Abstract BACKGROUND Survival of children with intracranial ependymoma is known to depend, in part, on the molecular group of the tumor. Previous studies have linked both PFA and ZFTA molecular group ependymomas to poor outcomes. As part of an unplanned analysis from ACNS0831, we explored outcomes for ZFTA supratentorial (ST) and PFA ependymomas. METHODS Patients were stratified by location, grade and extent of resection. Grade 2, ST tumors with no evidence of disease were observed only, N=37. All other patients were randomized to RT versus RT + maintenance chemotherapy or non-randomly assigned to RT + M if residual disease. A planned “as treated” analysis was performed by actual treatment received for randomized patients, excluding those who did not receive RT. Molecular groups were compared using two-sided log-rank tests stratified by study arms for all and randomized patients. Molecular characterization was achieved in 161/166 (97%) ST and 282/283(99.6%) PF. Among ST, 94% were classified ZFTA and 6% YAP1. Homozygous CDKN2A deletion was detected in 16 tumors, all ZFTA and WHO grade 3. Among posterior fossa ependymomas, 88% were classified as PFA and 12% as PFB. RESULTS There was no statistical difference in outcome according to treatment. Across all study arms, 5-year EFS was 69.6%+4.3 for ZFTA vs. 52.9%+3.4 for PFA (p=0.028). For the randomized cohort, 5-year EFS was 72.1+4.8 for ZFTA vs. 60.1+3.9 for PFA (p=0.076). For the randomized cohort with initial GTR/NTR, 5-year EFS was 74.1+5.1 for ZFTA patients vs. 61.0+4.2 for PFA patients (p=0.045). The 5-year EFS was 66.7+12.2 for ZFTA patients with CDKN2A deletion vs. 69.3+4.7 for ZFTA patients without CDKN2A deletion (p=0.232) CONCLUSION Children with ST ZFTA ependymomas have a significantly better outcome than those with PFA tumors. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A was present in 12% of ST ependymomas but was not an indicator of poor outcome.

A randomized, open-label phase II/III efficacy and safety study of atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction and high immune responsiveness: The IKF633/DANTE trial, a trial of AIO in collaboration with SAKK.

TPS4184 Background: Despite recent advances, long-term survival of patients with locally advanced, operable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) is below 50%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting of this tumor type have lately been shown to increase pathological responses in all comers (IKF633/DANTE pII, KEYNOTE-585, Matterhorn), but the effect on survival is still unknown. The IKF633/DANTE pIII trial evaluates the efficacy and clinical activity of atezolizumab (ATZ) with perioperative FLOT in patients (pts) with locally advanced, resectable EGA considered having an immune-responsive profile. Methods: IKF633/DANTE is conducted as a randomized, multinational, multicenter, prospective, investigator-initiated, open label phase II/III trial. For the phase III portion, pts with histologically confirmed EGA of a clinical stage ≥cT2 and/or cN+ without evidence of distant metastases and with at least one immune response criterium (MSI, PD-L1 CPS≥1, TMB ≥10/MB or EBV+) are eligible. Pts are stratified acc. to nodal stage (cN- vs. cN+), tumor site (GEJ type I vs. GEJ type II/III vs. gastric) and PD-L1 expression levels (CPS≥5 vs. CPS&lt;5). Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive 4 pre- and post-operative cycles FLOT/ATZ, followed by 8 cycles ATZ maintenance (Arm A) or 2x4 perioperative cycles FLOT alone (Arm B). In total, 556 pts will be enrolled, thereof 379 pts in phase III. This estimates to a recruitment time of 30 months plus 18 months follow-up for 80% statistical power and a significance level of p&lt;0.05 (two-sided log rank test). The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS) with a target hazard ratio of 0.72, reflecting a clinically relevant improvement to 41.65 months in arm A. Main secondary endpoints are pCR, overall survival (OS) also in high immune-responsive subgroups (CPS ≥5/ CPS≥ 10/ MSI), R0 resection rate and safety/tolerability. In addition, a prospective biomarker study with serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis accompanying therapy is performed to explore the prognostic impact of ctDNA on efficacy and survival parameters, as well as on relapse incidence. Recruitment of phase III started in Aug 2023 and is still ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03421288 .

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 in MRD-positive stage II-III colorectal cancer.

TPS3642 Background: About 25% to 30% of resectable high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancers might relapse after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX regimen. Recent studies have underscored the significance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD), representing a residual presence of cancer cells, as a prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence in CRC. Patients exhibiting positive MRD predicted a considerable high risk of recurrence and metastasis, even after adjuvant chemotherapy. In the realm of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, Comparing with FOLFOX, whether the early introduction of intensified chemotherapy, mFOLFOXIRI, could further eradicate MRD and improve the long-term prognosis remains unclear. Methods: This multicenter phase III study (NCT05427669) plans to enroll 340 colorectal cancer patients with MRD positive after curative-intent R0 surgical resection, age 18 to 70 years, ECOG performance status 0-1. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive mFOLFOXIRI (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², irinotecan 150 mg/m², and 5-FU 2.4 g/m²over 46 h) or mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 then 2.4 g/m² over 46 h) every two weeks for 24 weeks (12 cycles). Patients will be followed for 5 years after the end of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 3-year DFS. A gain of 14% in 3-yr DFS is expected (74% in the experimental arm vs. 60% in the control arm; α, 5% [two-sided log-rank test]; 1-β, 80%). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, 3-year distant metastasis-free survival, QoL and toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT05427669 .

INAVO122: A phase III study of maintenance inavolisib or placebo + pertuzumab + trastuzumab following induction with pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (HER2+ aBC).

TPS1124 Background: The PI3K pathway plays a crucial role in HER2 signaling. Somatic mutations of PIK3CA, the gene that encodes the PI3K p110α subunit, may induce resistance to HER2-targeted therapies and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes (Swain SM, et al. SABCS 2022; P2-11-07). Inavolisib, a potent p110α-selective inhibitor that induces degradation of mutant p110α, has shown antitumor activity in PIK3CA-mutated HER2+ BC and long-term tolerability with early intervention for common on-class toxicities, including hyperglycemia, diarrhea, and stomatitis (Jhaveri KL, et al. SABCS 2023; GS03-13, Bedard P, et al. ASCO 2022; 1052). The current study will assess the efficacy and safety of maintenance inavolisib + fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab + trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) after first-line (1L) induction treatment in pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HER2+ aBC. Methods: INAVO122 (NCT05894239) is a multicenter, randomized, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Pts will be enrolled for: 1L induction treatment if they are receiving/will receive PH + a taxane; or for maintenance treatment if they completed induction treatment per standard of care. In the maintenance phase, pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive inavolisib (9 mg orally once daily; 21-day cycles) + PH FDC SC (every 3 weeks), or placebo + PH FDC SC. Study treatment will continue until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, death, consent withdrawal, or at the investigator’s (INV) discretion. Enrolled pts must have centrally determined HER2+, PIK3CA-mutated tumors, with documented hormone receptor status per local assessment, and be disease-free for ≥6 months from completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant HER2-targeted treatment. They must not have received any non-hormonal treatment for aBC prior to induction, and, at screening, fasting glucose must be &lt;126 mg/dL and HbA1c &lt;6.4%. To be randomized, pts must have completed induction therapy without PD and show left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. The primary endpoint is INV-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival; INV-assessed objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, and time to second disease progression; health-related quality of life; safety; and pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint analysis will utilize a two-sided stratified log-rank test at a two-sided significance level of 5%. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio between the two treatment arms and its 95% confidence intervals. An independent data monitoring committee will be in place for safety. Target randomization is ~230 pts; this study is currently recruiting (15 pts enrolled). Encore from SABCS 2023 (PO2-19-09). Clinical trial information: NCT05894239 .

Comparing prospectively assigned trial and real-world lung cancer patients.

Aim: To evaluate the comparability of a probable clinical trial (CT) cohort derived from electronic medical records (EMR) data with a real-world cohort treated with the same therapy and identified using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria to emulate an external control. Methods: We utilized de-identified patient-level structured data sourced from EMRs. We then compared patterns of overall survival (OS) between probable CT patients with those drawn from non-contemporaneous real-world data (RWD) using a two-sided log-rank test, hazard ratios (HRs) using a Cox proportional-hazards model and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves. Each regression estimate was calculated with a corresponding 95% confidence interval. We additionally conducted multiple matching methods to assess their relative performance. Results: Median (standard deviation) OS was 10.2 (0.7) months for the RWD arm and 11.3 (1.3) for the probable CT arm with a Log rank p-value equal to 0.4771. OS in both cohorts is longer than the reported CT median OS of 9.2 (0.6). The HRs generated under all five assessed matching methods (including without adjustment) were not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Conclusion: Our results suggest, with caveats noted, that survival patterns between real-world and CT cohorts in this NSCLC setting are not statistically significantly different.

Abstract PO4-20-05: An open label phase III randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of Post-chemotherapy Axillary Conservation Surgery in breast cancer (PACS)

Abstract Background- Axillary lymph nodes (ALN) status is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Traditionally, a complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been standard of care for those patients who have a positive node pre-chemotherapy. However, lately axillary conservation is paving its way in the post-chemotherapy setting as well to avoid significant morbidity of ALND. Most sentinel node biopsy studies have failed to achieve the desired false negative rate(FNR). (Boughey JC et al, JAMA. 2013 Oct; Kuehn T et al, Lancet Oncol. 2013; Boileau JF et al, J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan).We previously reported a low FNR of low axillary sampling (LAS) in the post-chemotherapy setting. (Parmar et al, JCO-GO, 2021) We are conducting a phase III, randomised controlled trial of LAS versus complete ALND in post-chemotherapy negative (ypN0) axilla. Aims and objectives- The primary objective is to assess the non-inferiority of LAS in patients who are rendered ypN0 by pre-operative chemotherapy with disease-free survival as primary end point. The secondary objectives are comparing the morbidity of ALND (lymphedema, paraesthesia, and shoulder dysfunction) in the LAS and ALND arms, and to evaluate the impact on overall survival, local, regional, and distant recurrence free survival and quality of life. Trial design- This is a prospective, open label, randomised, phase III trial where histologically proven, non-metastatic, cT1-4,N0-2 breast cancer patients who are rendered ycN0 after pre-operative systemic chemotherapy are being accrued. Patients with prechemo N3 disease, inflammatory breast cancer, recurrent disease, pregnancy associated breast cancer are being excluded from the study. The chemotherapy regimens and surgical assessment is as per standard institutional protocols. After obtaining informed consent, patients undergo LAS during surgery and lymph nodes(LN) are sent for frozen section analysis. If any LN is found to be involved, a complete ALND is carried out. If the staging procedure is negative, then patients are randomised into 2 groups- observation v/s complete ALND. Stratification factors are T stage, N stage, Hormone receptor status, Her2 receptor status and number of chemotherapy cycles taken. Morbidity assessment is done with- Constans shoulder score, arm volumetry, paraesthesia assessment, and a QOL questionnaire- Self-reported Breast cancer Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index (BCLSEI). A baseline assessment pre-surgery is followed by 6 monthly morbidity assessments and regular oncologically relevant follow-up up to 5 years. A two-sided log-rank test with an overall sample size of 2316 with a 10% dropout rate (1158 in ALND and 1158 in LAS group) achieves 80% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect a hazard ratio of 1.16 (upper limit of non-inferiority) when the proportion surviving in the control group is 0.71. An interim analysis will be carried out at 25% events and conditional power will be calculated. If the conditional power is below 20%, then the study will be discontinued for futility. The study has been approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (CTRI/2022/07/044461) Expected Study and Results- We started accrual in February 2023 and have screened 63 and randomized 45 patients until now. Ours is a first large randomised prospective study in the post-chemotherapy axillary management setting which will help us understand the efficacy of axillary conservation surgery in patients who are node negative post neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In future, lesser morbid procedures than LAS like targeted axillary dissection can be tested in the same trial. However, LAS as a technique of axillary conservation suits resource constraints and high volume setting such as ours. Citation Format: Shalaka Joshi, Jessicka Shah, Pallavi Daphale, Rohini Hawaldar, Anuradha Daptardar, Ayushi Sahay, Tanuja Shet, Palak Popat, Tabassum Wadasadawala, Nita Nair, Vani Parmar, Bipin Bandre, Shabina Siddique, Vaibhav Vanmali, Sudeep Gupta, Rajendra Badwe. An open label phase III randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of Post-chemotherapy Axillary Conservation Surgery in breast cancer (PACS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-05.

Abstract PO2-19-09: INAVO122: a Phase III study of maintenance inavolisib or placebo + pertuzumab + trastuzumab following induction with pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer

Abstract Background The PI3K pathway plays a crucial role in HER2 signaling. Somatic mutations of PIK3CA, the gene that encodes the PI3K p110α subunit, may induce resistance to HER2-targeted therapies and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes (Swain SM, et al. SABCS 2022; P2-11-07). Inavolisib, a potent p110α-selective inhibitor that induces degradation of mutant p110α, has shown antitumor activity in PIK3CA-mutated HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) and long-term tolerability with early intervention for common on-class toxicities, including hyperglycemia, diarrhea, and stomatitis (Bedard P, et al. ASCO 2022; 1052). The current study will assess the efficacy and safety of maintenance inavolisib + fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab + trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) after first-line induction treatment in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HER2+, advanced BC (aBC). Trial design INAVO122 is a multicenter, randomized, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients will be enrolled for: first-line induction treatment if they are receiving/will receive PH + a taxane; or maintenance treatment completing induction treatment. In the maintenance phase, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive inavolisib (9 mg orally once daily; Days 1–21 of 21-day cycles) + PH FDC SC (every 3 weeks), or placebo + PH FDC SC. Study treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, consent withdrawal, or at the investigator’s discretion. ELIGIBILITY Enrolled patients must have centrally determined HER2+, PIK3CA-mutated tumors, with documented hormone receptor status per local assessment, and be disease-free for ≥ 6 months from completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic non-hormonal treatment. They must not have received any treatment for aBC prior to induction, and, at screening, fasting glucose must be &amp;lt; 126 mg/dL and HbA1c &amp;lt; 6.4%. To be randomized, patients must have completed induction therapy per standard of care without progression of disease and show left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%. AIMS The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival; investigator-assessed objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, and time to second disease progression; health-related quality of life; safety; and pharmacokinetics. STATISTICAL METHODS The primary endpoint analysis will utilize a two-sided stratified log-rank test at a two-sided significance level of 5%. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio between the two treatment arms and its 95% confidence intervals. ACCRUAL Target randomization is ~230 patients; recruitment began in July 2023. CONTACT INFORMATION For more information or to refer a patient, email global.rochegenentechtrials@roche.com or call 1-888-662-6728 (USA only). Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT05894239. Citation Format: Sandra Swain, Carlos Barrios, Reva Basho, Giuseppe Curigliano, Nadia Harbeck, Chiun-Shen Huang, Sherene Loi, Nicholas Turner, Jessica Chen, Volkmar Henschel, Simon Warburton, Fabiola Amair-Pinedo, Javier Cortés. INAVO122: a Phase III study of maintenance inavolisib or placebo + pertuzumab + trastuzumab following induction with pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-09.

Abstract PO1-19-11: Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib or Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, Trial in Progress)

Abstract Background The current first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is trastuzumab (T) plus pertuzumab (P) and a taxane. Despite advances in 1L SOC, most patients progress during maintenance therapy with T+P. Tucatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in combination with T and capecitabine for adults with HER2+ MBC, with and without brain metastases (BM). In HER2CLIMB, addition of tucatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HER2+ MBC and was well tolerated. Adding tucatinib also reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with untreated and/or active BM (Murthy et al. NEJM 2020, Curigliano et al. Ann Oncol 2022). HER2CLIMB-05 investigates whether adding tucatinib to 1L SOC as maintenance therapy will extend PFS while maintaining quality of life (QOL). Methods HER2CLIMB-05 (NCT05132582) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study evaluating tucatinib plus T+P as maintenance therapy for HER2+ MBC. Approximately 650 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients will have advanced HER2+ disease, no progression on 4–8 cycles of prior 1L SOC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1, and no or asymptomatic BM. Exclusion criteria include prior treatment with anti-HER2 and/or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor TKI (prior SOC for early BC is permitted) or inability to undergo contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either tucatinib or placebo twice daily, with T+P once every 21 days. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease may receive endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, time to deterioration of health-related QOL, central nervous system PFS, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. PFS and OS will be compared using a two-sided stratified log-rank test between treatment groups. Time-to-event endpoints will be summarized using the Kaplan–Meier method. PK and safety data will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Enrollment is ongoing in Austria, Chile, Greece, Italy, Japan, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the US, and several other European, APAC, and LATAM countries. This abstract was previously presented at ESMO-BC 2022, FPN (Final Publication Number): 415, by Veronique Dieras (reused with permission). Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Junji Tsurutani, Giuseppe Curigliano, Miguel Martín, Ciara O'Sullivan, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Libero Santarpia, Shan Yang, Véronique Diéras. Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib or Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, Trial in Progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-11.

The Prognostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated Using Radiotherapy.

There is growing interest in the prognostic value of routinely performed pre-treatment blood test indices, such as the RDW or SII, with the latter combining the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). These indices were shown to be prognostic for survival in some malignancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between pre-treatment RDW and SII, and OS in patients treated with radiotherapy for primary localised cervical cancer. This retrospective analysis included patients treated with definitive CRT between 2011 and 2017 for histopathologically confirmed FIGO 2018 stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models, with the AIC serving as a prediction error estimator. The study group included 249 patients with a median age of 57.2 years and a median follow-up of 75.8 months. The majority were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (237; 95.2%) and had FIGO stage III (211; 84.7%). Approximately half of the patients (116; 46.4%) had regional lymph node metastases. Patients with a low RDW (≤13.4%) and low SII (≤986.01) had a significantly longer OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002). The RDW remained as an independent prognostic factor in the multivariable model (high vs. low; HR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.32-3.16; p = 0.001). Including RDW in the model decreased the Akaike Information Criterion from 1028.25 to 1018.15. The RDW is a cheap and widely available index that is simultaneously an independent prognostic factor for survival and could be used to improve pre-treatment prognosis assessments in patients with cervical cancer undergoing CRT. Available data encourage assessing the RDW as a prognostic factor in prospective trials to aid the identification of candidates for treatment escalation.

Primary liver transplantation vs transplant after Kasai portoenterostomy in children with biliary atresia: A retrospective Brazilian single-center cohort.

Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for pediatric liver trans plantation, although portoenterostomy is usually performed first. However, due to the high failure rate of portoenterostomy, liver transplantation has been advocated as the primary procedure for patients with BA. It is still unclear if a previous portoenterostomy has a negative impact on liver transplantation outcomes. To investigate the effect of prior portoenterostomy in infants un dergoing liver transplantation for BA. This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 pediatric patients with BA who underwent primary liver transplantation from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center in Brazil. Patients with BA were divided into two groups: Those under going primary liver transplantation without portoenterostomy and those undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for portal vein thrombosis. Patient and graft survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator, and patient subgroups were compared using the two-sided log-rank test. Forty-two patients were included in the study (25 [60%] girls), 23 undergoing liver transplantation without prior portoenterostomy, and 19 undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Patients with prior portoenterostomy were older (12 vs 8 months; P = 0.02) at the time of liver transplantation and had lower Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (13.2 vs 21.4; P = 0.01). The majority of the patients (35/42, 83%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation. The group of patients without prior portoenterostomy appeared to have a higher incidence of portal vein thrombosis (39 vs 11%), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Prior portoenterostomy was not a protective factor against portal vein thrombosis in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for age at liver transplantation, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and use of vascular grafts. Finally, the groups did not significantly differ in terms of post-transplant survival. In our study, prior portoenterostomy did not significantly affect the outcomes of liver transplantation.

Multifactor assessment of ovarian cancer reveals immunologically interpretable molecular subtypes with distinct prognoses.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly heterogeneous and malignant gynecological cancer, thereby leading to poor clinical outcomes. The study aims to identify and characterize clinically relevant subtypes in OC and develop a diagnostic model that can precisely stratify OC patients, providing more diagnostic clues for OC patients to access focused therapeutic and preventative strategies. Gene expression datasets of OC were retrieved from TCGA and GEO databases. To evaluate immune cell infiltration, the ESTIMATE algorithm was applied. A univariate Cox analysis and the two-sided log-rank test were used to screen OC risk factors. We adopted the ConsensusClusterPlus algorithm to determine OC subtypes. Enrichment analysis based on KEGG and GO was performed to determine enriched pathways of signature genes for each subtype. The machine learning algorithm, support vector machine (SVM) was used to select the feature gene and develop a diagnostic model. A ROC curve was depicted to evaluate the model performance. A total of 1,273 survival-related genes (SRGs) were firstly determined and used to clarify OC samples into different subtypes based on their different molecular pattern. SRGs were successfully stratified in OC patients into three robust subtypes, designated S-I (Immunoreactive and DNA Damage repair), S-II (Mixed), and S-III (Proliferative and Invasive). S-I had more favorable OS and DFS, whereas S-III had the worst prognosis and was enriched with OC patients at advanced stages. Meanwhile, comprehensive functional analysis highlighted differences in biological pathways: genes associated with immune function and DNA damage repair including CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, APEX, APEX2, and RBX1 were enriched in S-I; S-II combined multiple gene signatures including genes associated with metabolism and transcription; and the gene signature of S-III was extensively involved in pathways reflecting malignancies, including many core kinases and transcription factors involved in cancer such as CDK6, ERBB2, JAK1, DAPK1, FOXO1, and RXRA. The SVM model showed superior diagnostic performance with AUC values of 0.922 and 0.901, respectively. Furthermore, a new dataset of the independent cohort could be automatically analyzed by this innovative pipeline and yield similar results. This study exploited an innovative approach to construct previously unexplored robust subtypes significantly related to different clinical and molecular features for OC and a diagnostic model using SVM to aid in clinical diagnosis and treatment. This investigation also illustrated the importance of targeting innate immune suppression together with DNA damage in OC, offering novel insights for further experimental exploration and clinical trial.

Lenalidomide Consolidation Improves Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Rates and Progression Free Survival in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Following Initial FCR Chemotherapy - Final Analysis of CLL6 Residuum Study of the Australian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) and the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO)

Introduction Eradication of MRD after first line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) correlates with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Lenalidomide (LEN) has antiproliferative and immunomodulatory effects in CLL and may improve response following CIT (Buhler et al 2016; Fink et al 2017). Here we report the final analysis of the phase III, randomized, CLL6 RESIDUUM trial, that aimed to determine whether LEN improves immunophenotypic (IP) complete response (CR) rates and extends remission duration in patients with CLL who have MRD following induction CIT. Methods The CLL6 trial was a joint trial of the ALLG and the FILO. CLL patients with CIRS score &amp;lt;6 requiring treatment according to iwCLL received 4 to 6 cycles of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). After completion of treatment, patients with clinical, radiological and/or flow cytometry evidence of MRD in blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 years of 10 mg daily LEN consolidation or observation (OBS). High sensitivity (HS) MRD were scheduled at month 3, 6 and every 6 months until month 24 then every 12 months until month 72 in PB and at screening and on months 12 and 24 in BM. The primary endpoint was time to clinical disease progression, or death, from randomization. The study planned to randomize 192 patients to detect a hazard ratio of 1.94, i.e., an increase in the % of patients remaining progression free at 4 years to 70% in the LEN arm compared with 50% in the OBS arm (two-sided log rank test at alpha = 0.05, no competing risks or loss to follow up, power = 0.86). Results The study closed prematurely because of an acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) warning (3 of 56 patients [5.4%]) in the CLLM1 trial (Fink et al., 2017; Fürstenau et al., 2021). Between May 2011 and January 2018, 143 patients were randomized (70 in Australia and 73 in France) to the LEN (n=71) or OBS (n=72) arms. Median age was 63 [range 41-78], and 60 [26-79] years in the LEN and OBS arms respectively, 113 patients were males. At randomization, 27 (38 %) and 23 (32%) patients were in CR, 9 (13%) and 10 (14%) in nPR, 35 (49%) and 39 (54%) in PR in LEN and OBS arms respectively. Forty-nine (69%) and 47 (65%) had PB and 56 (79%) and 58 (81%) had BM detectable MRD in LEN and OBS arm respectively. Median follow-up (FU) is 52.6 months (range 44.9-59.0; LEN 49.8 [41.9-57.1], OBS 55.59 [44.0-61.7]). Twenty-eight (39%) patients progressed in the LEN arm versus 40 (56%) in the OBS arm (χ² p=0.01), 8 died in each arm. Median PFS was 64.6 (95%CI 47.7-not reached [NR]) months in the LEN arm versus 42.4 (32.3-61.6) months in the OBS arm (p=0.039). Multivariate analysis did not identify any predictive factor of relapse. Median overall survival was not reached (NR) (77.58-NR) in the LEN arm and 107.7 (107.6-NR) months in the OBS arm. There were 118 adverse events (AE), 87 in the LEN and 31 in the OBS arms respectively, with more neutropenia (n=21 vs n=1), gastrointestinal (n=10 vs n=4), respiratory (n=9 vs n=0) nervous system (n=6 vs n=1) and musculoskeletal (n=4 vs n=1) in the LEN arm. Most of the excess of AEs in LEN arm occurred after the end of the treatment. Severe AEs were reported in 35 patients (24.5%), 24 in the LEN arm and 11 in OBS. Fifteen secondary malignancies occurred: 8 in the LEN arm; 7 in the OBS arm. Six were of hematological origin (2 Richter transformation in each arm, 1 marginal zone lymphoma in the OBS arm and 1 myelodysplastic syndrome in the LEN arm). No case of ALL occurred. HS MRD analyses were performed in 71/73 patients in the French cohort. A follow-up was available in 65/71 with a median number of 7 time-points per patients (range 3-10). Different MRD kinetics were observed. While MRD rates in OBS arm increased in 33/34 patients, LEN consolidation led to long-lasting and transient deep IP CR in 4/31 and 9/31 patients respectively, MRD rate stabilization in 10/31 patients, and MRD increase in the remaining 6/31 patients. Conclusion The CLL6 RESIDUUM study demonstrated a significant benefit of consolidation therapy with lenalidomide in CLL patients with residual disease after FCR treatment. LEN resulted in a significantly longer PFS, with no unacceptable toxicity including ALL. Although FCR is no longer considered gold standard initial CLL therapy, eradicating residual disease can remain challenging with newer targeted agents. Patients with CLL MRD following initial therapy may experience prolongation in progression free survival from LEN consolidation.

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status Predicts Outcomes in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated with Chemo-Immunotherapy on SWOG S0016

Background. FL is associated with a heterogeneous clinical course, and currently available prognostic indicators are unable to reliably separate patients who exhibit early therapy resistance (POD24, defined as progression within 24 months from diagnosis) from those who achieve “functional cure” following initial therapy. NGS methods developed in recent years enabled quantification of MRD. The ClonoSeq assay (Adaptive Biotechnology, Inc.) has been FDA-cleared to track MRD in several hematologic malignancies. Here we demonstrate that MRD analysis by ClonoSeq assay predicts outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with advanced stage FL enrolled on SWOG S0016 clinical trial. Methods. SWOG S0016 was a phase III randomized study that compared the safety and efficacy of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with CHOP-RIT (CHOP + I 133-tositumomab) in patients with FL. Between 2001 and 2008, 531 patients with previously untreated advanced-stage FL (bulky stage II, III-IV) of any pathologic grade were randomly assigned to receive 6 cycles of R-CHOP or CHOP-RIT. We used high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of the IGH and IGK/L loci (ClonoSeq assay) from tumor biopsy specimenstaken prior to treatment to define CDR3 rearrangements that tag the tumor. Subsequently, 1-year bone marrow specimens were screened for residual disease. The baseline dominant clone was defined as ≥10 estimated number of genomes (ENG) and comprised ≥5% of the library. MRD-positive state (MRDp) was defined as a minimum Hamming distance (HD) ≤6 in a patient's post-library (in any clone also detected in a pre-library) and conserved pre-existing SHM (if HD&amp;gt;0). Undetectable MRD (MRDu, at &amp;lt;10 -4) was defined as CRD3 HD&amp;gt;6 in a post-library with a depth &amp;gt;10,000 ENG. Five-year progression-free survival was the primary endpoint (PFS; defined as the time from registration to the first observation of progression or death due to any cause). Landmark analysis was defined at 1 year after registration and used for imputing the 5-year PFS and OS. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from registration to date of death due to any cause or last follow-up. PFS and OS estimates and 95% confidence interval were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared for MRDp and MRDu disease using two-sided log-rank test. HR and 95% CI were calculated using Cox regression model. Results. Tumor biopsy tissue was available for 189 patients. Of these, 24 patients were not evaluable (16 did not consent for banking, 6 were ineligible and 4 had an early event). In 36 patients, pre-libraries did not yield a trackable clone. In total, MRD status could not be ascertained in 47 patients due to absence of a clear trackable clone in either pre- or post-library, contributing to a 28.8% failure rate. Of 116 patients which yielded a trackable clone in both libraries, 83 were MRDu and 33 were MRDp. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, β2M, B symptoms, bulky disease, grade 3, stage, and FLIPI risk) were similar between MRDp and MRDu patients; however, MRDp patients were more likely to exhibit morphologic baseline bone marrow involvement by FL (82% vs. 55%, p=0.01). The estimated 5-year PFS was 72% in MRDu patients and 30% in MRD+ patients (Figure); 10-year PFS was 56% and 17%, correspondingly. Meanwhile, 5-year OS was not different (96% for MRDu, 81% for MRD+, p=0.91). Patients with MRDu had a significantly higher best overall response rate than MRDp patients (96% vs 79%, p=0.005), but complete response (CR) rates were similar (41% vs. 30.3%). Patients who received CHOP-RIT had better PFS regardless of MRD status (HR=0.48, p=0.01 for MRDu; HR=0.38, p=0.02 for MRDp), while OS was not statistically different. Five-year PFS was superior in patients who achieved MRDu (75% for CR and 70% for PR) compared with MRDp patients, regardless of response (34%). Patients who had MRDp status had a significantly increased risk of experiencing POD24 relative to MRDu patients (RR=6.5, 95% CI 3.0-14.0; p&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusion. Here we for the first time demonstrate that MRDu status, as assessed by Clonoseq, predicts improved 5- and 10-year PFS in patients with FL initially treated with chemoimmunotherapy. MRD+ status in the bone marrow at a 1-year timepoint was associated with POD24. Despite a relatively high failure rate to detect trackable sequences using current technology (~29%), MRD assessment by NGS is a promising prognostic tool in FL. *co-senior authors

Nivolumab Switch Maintenance Therapy After Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Induction in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial by the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors of the German Cancer Society (NIVOSWITCH; AIO-NZK-0116ass)

BackgroundThe role of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) maintenance therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is undefined. ObjectiveTo determine whether switch maintenance therapy with nivolumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity. Design, setting, and participantsThis open-label phase 2 trial randomized patients with a partial response or stable disease after 10–12-wk TKI induction therapy to either TKI or nivolumab maintenance. Key inclusion criteria were measurable disease, clear cell histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0–2, and adequate organ function. InterventionIntravenous nivolumab 8 × 240 mg every 2 wk, followed by 480 mg every 4 wk or sunitinib 50 mg (4–2 regimen) or pazopanib 800 mg once daily orally. Outcome measurements and statistical analysesThe primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03), and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index). The Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. Results and limitationsMaintenance therapy was nivolumab for 25 patients (51.0%) and TKI for 24 (48.9%). The median age was 65 yr (range 35–79). Nine patients (18.4%) were female, 31 (63.3%) had ECOG PS of 0, and 15 (30.6%) had favorable risk. OS data are immature (17 deaths, 34.7%). The ORR was 20.0% (n = 5) for nivolumab and 52.2% (n = 12) for TKI. PFS was worse with nivolumab (hazard ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.36–4.89; p = 0.003). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 14 patients (56.0%) with nivolumab and 17 (70.8%) with TKI. A major limitation is early termination of our study. ConclusionsTKI treatment achieved superior ORR and PFS in comparison to nivolumab maintenance therapy. Our data do not indicate a role for nivolumab switch maintenance in mRCC. Patient summaryPatients with metastatic kidney cancer who experienced a tumor response or disease stabilization after a short period of targeted treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor did not benefit from a switch to the immunotherapy drug nivolumab. Patients who continued their original treatment achieved better responses and a longer time without disease progression.This trial is registered on EudraCT as 2016-002170-13 and on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02959554.

P12.02.B CHARACTERIZATION AND PROGNOSTIC EVALUATION OF PSTAT3 EXPRESSION IN PERITUMORAL REACTIVE ASTROCYTES OF BRAIN METASTASES FROM RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) shows a key role in regulating the anti-tumor immune response. STAT3 is activated in cancer cells and in the tumor microenvironment thus inhibiting crucial immune regulators expression and promoting immunosuppressive factors. Brain metastatic cells sustain a pro-metastatic signal through the hyperexpression of pSTAT3 in reactive astrocytes (RAs) surrounding metastases and succeed in generating an immunosuppressive signal resulting in a worsened prognosis. Pre-clinical analyses demonstrated that brain metastases (BMs) size might be reduced by blocking STAT3 signal in RAs. pSTAT3 expression in BMs from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has never been systematically analyzed. Our study aims to investigate pSTAT3 expression in RCC brain metastatic specimens to identify its therapeutic and prognostic role. Materials and METHODS A total of 27 paraffin-embedded human BMs from RCC obtained through surgical resection at the Neurosurgical Units of University of Bari “Aldo Moro” and University of Turin were stained for phosphorylated (Tyr705) STAT3 (pSTAT3) and GFAP, then evaluated and scored by clinical neuropathologists of the University of Turin. Protein expression was semi-quantitatively assessed according to the intensity and the number of positive cells. Overall survival (OS) was intended by the date of BMs onset. A survival curve was generated by grouping patients with high (score 2-3) and low (score 0-1) pSTAT3 in ARs. P values were obtained with the two-sided log-rank test. RESULTS 97% (26 out 27) of BMs were positive for pSTAT3 (pSTAT3+) in RAs, with 41% of them receiving a score above 1. In detail, 1 scored with 3 (moderate and diffuse expression), 10 (38%) with 2 (moderate focal expression or weak diffuse expression) and 15 (56%) with 1 (weak and focal expression) according to the abundance and signal intensity of pSTAT3 in ARs. The median OS from BM onset was 12 months. After grouping patients by the high or low pSTAT3 expression level, no significant survival differences were evidenced (mOS 10 vs 13 months, p= 0.432). CONCLUSIONS Our study represents the first analysis investigating pSTAT3 expression on BMs from RCC. Considering the low number of specimens, which reflects a low rate of surgical resections, our work assumes an exploratory value. RAs surrounding BMs from RCC ubiquitously express pSTAT3, but only 41% of cases with a moderate or diffuse expression seem to be related to a biological pro-metastatic role. Although patients with high pSTAT3 expression showed reduced survival, this result was not statistically significant, possibly due to the limited sample size. If confirmed in larger and prospective cohorts, these data could lay the foundation for new therapeutic strategies involving pSTAT3 signaling inhibition (Silibinin) eventually improving the intracranial response rate.

Survival with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BackgroundIn an analysis of the primary outcome of this phase 3 trial, patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, as second-line treatment had significantly longer event-free survival than those who received standard care. Data were needed on longer-term outcomes.MethodsIn this trial, we randomly assigned patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in a 1:1 ratio to receive either axi-cel or standard care (two to three cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients who had a response). The primary outcome was event-free survival, and key secondary outcomes were response and overall survival. Here, we report the results of the prespecified overall survival analysis at 5 years after the first patient underwent randomization.ResultsA total of 359 patients underwent randomization to receive axi-cel (180 patients) or standard care (179 patients). At a median follow-up of 47.2 months, death had been reported in 82 patients in the axi-cel group and in 95 patients in the standard-care group. The median overall survival was not reached in the axi-cel group and was 31.1 months in the standard-care group; the estimated 4-year overall survival was 54.6% and 46.0%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.98; P=0.03 by stratified two-sided log-rank test). This increased survival with axi-cel was observed in the intention-to-treat population, which included 74% of patients with primary refractory disease and other high-risk features. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 14.7 months in the axi-cel group and 3.7 months in the standard-care group, with estimated 4-year percentages of 41.8% and 24.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67). No new treatment-related deaths had occurred since the primary analysis of event-free survival.ConclusionsAt a median follow-up of 47.2 months, axi-cel as second-line treatment for patients with early relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma resulted in significantly longer overall survival than standard care. (Funded by Kite; ZUMA-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03391466.)

EvERA Breast Cancer (BC): Phase III study of giredestrant + everolimus vs exemestane + everolimus in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic BC (ER+, HER2– LA/mBC).

TPS1119 Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) + a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard of care in pts with ER+, HER2– mBC in the first-line setting. Fulvestrant ± a CDK4/6i, and everolimus + exemestane are the current approved second-line regimens. However, therapeutic resistance to some ETs, such as aromatase inhibitors, can arise from ESR1 mutations (m) driving estrogen-independent transcription and proliferation. Current post-CDK4/6i treatment options are suboptimal. New therapy options are therefore needed to reduce this risk and to improve outcomes, tolerability, quality of life, and adherence to treatment. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER antagonist and degrader (SERD) that achieves robust ER occupancy and is active regardless of ESR1-mut status. While Phase I SERD combination data in the post-CDK4/6i setting are encouraging, there are no randomized combination data. Combining giredestrant and everolimus may improve outcomes after CDK4/6is and in pts with ESR1m tumors. Methods: evERA BC (NCT05306340), a Phase III, global, randomized, open-label, multicenter study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of giredestrant + everolimus vs. exemestane + everolimus in pts with ER+, HER2– LA/mBC who had previous treatment with a CDK4/6i and ET in the LA/mBC or adjuvant setting. Pts will be randomized to either giredestrant (30 mg) + everolimus (10 mg) by mouth (PO) every day (QD), or exemestane (25 mg) + everolimus (10 mg) PO QD. Pts will receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts will use a dexamethasone mouth rinse 4 times QD for 8 weeks concurrently with study treatment. Eligibility: Female/male pts ≥ 18 years with ER+, HER2– LA/mBC and disease progression ≥ 6 months (mo) after initiating ET + CDK4/6i in the LA/mBC setting (and ≥ 4 mo on most recent ET, if ET + CDK4/6i was not the most recent therapy received), or relapsed either while taking or within 12 mo of exposure to combination adjuvant ET (≥ 12 mo) + CDK4/6i (≥ 6 mo), and available blood sample for circulating tumor DNA central testing for ESR1m status. Men and pre-/perimenopausal women will receive a LHRH. Co-primary endpoints: Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (per RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and ESR1m populations. Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; objective response rate; duration of response; clinical benefit rate; pt-reported outcomes; safety; pharmacokinetics. Co-primary endpoint analyses will use a two-sided stratified log-rank test at an overall 0.05 significance level. An independent data monitoring committee will be in place for safety. Target enrollment is 320 pts, and this study is currently recruiting. Encore from SABCS 2022 (OT2-01-07). Clinical trial information: NCT05306340 .

Correlation of Atherosclerotic Dyslipidemia with Long-Term Stroke Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Atherosclerotic dyslipidemia (AD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and stroke events, but the effect of AD among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between AD and long-term stroke recurrence in AIS patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis. This prospective cohort study included 499 AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke subtype was classified according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria, patients' clinical characteristics, and results from multiple diagnostic tests. The primary endpoint event was ischemic stroke recurrence; the time to first AIS recurrence was estimated using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and compared using the two-sided Log rank test. Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the association between AD and long-term stroke recurrence. Of the 499 patients with AIS treated with rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis, 80 (16.0%) had AD, and 60 (12.0%) had a stroke recurrence event. Kaplan‒Meier analysis showed that the stroke recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with AD than in those without AD (p = 0.035, log rank test) and in the large-artery disease (LAD) subtype (p = 0.006, log rank test). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that AD (HR = 2.363, 95% CI: 1.294-4.314, P = 0.005) and atrial fibrillation (HR = 2.325, 95% CI: 1.007-5.366, P = 0.048) were associated with an increased risk of long-term stroke recurrence in AIS patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis. Furthermore, AD was associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence in patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis in the LAD subtype (HR = 3.122, 95% CI: 1.304-7.437, P = 0.011). We found that AD increases the risk of long-term stroke recurrence in AIS patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis. This association may be stronger in the LAD subtype.