The value of the vacancy migration enthalpy in α-iron has been the subject of a long standing controversy. In the one-interstitial model, the value of 0.55 eV has been put forward, whereas in the two-interstitial model a value of about 1.3 eV is given. In a review paper l, it was concluded that the majority of experimental data is in favour of the one-interstitial model. It was also pointed out that, if one accepts this model, an important problem remained to be solved: the vacancy migration enthalpy that can be obtained by subtracting the vacancy formation enthalpy from the self diffusion enthalpy (provided that self-diffusion is driven by a vacancy mechanism), was more than twice the vacancy migration enthalpy of the one-interstitial model. We report here on research we performed concerning this problem. The values of the enthalpies of vacancy formation and self diffusion were carefully re-investigated, taking into account: 1) the influence of ferromagnetic ordering, and 2) the influence of the strong interaction between residual carbon atoms and vacancies. To determine the ferromagnetic self diffusion enthalpy QS D,f, we used reliable literature data on self diffusion in iron. The main conclusion of our analysis is that only an upperlimit to QS D,f, can be given 2: QS D,f ⩽2.75 eV. We also performed positron annihilation measurements in thermal equilibrium on pure and carbon doped (50 and 750 appm) samples to determine the ferromagnetic vacancy formation enthalpy H V f,f. In very pure iron no trapping of positrons is observed below the Curie point, so that H V f,f cannot be determined. However in carbon-doped samples the carbon-vacancy pair can be used as a probe to determine H V f,f. We obtained: H V f,f = (2.0 ± 0.2) eV. This value is the first fully experimental determination of this parameter. By combining the data given above, we conclude that an upperlimit to the ferromagnetic vacancy migration enthalpy H V m,f is: H V m,f ⩽ 0.95 eV. On the other hand, it can be shown 3 that H V m,f ⩾ 0.16 eV. We therefore conclude that there is no longer an inconsistency between the one-interstitial model and the vacancy migration enthalpy derived from thermal equilibrium measurements.