Twitter Users Research Articles

Breaking the silence: The effects of online social movements on gender-based violence

This paper investigates the impact of online social movements against gender-based violence (GBV) on GBV-related crime. Using machine learning techniques, we construct a novel dataset tracking the prevalence of GBV-related social media movements on Twitter from 2014 to 2017. Matching this data with weekly FBI crime reports across U.S. states we estimate the effect of tweets related to GBV on GBV-related reported crime. Our econometric approach aims to mitigate concerns of spurious correlations arising from common trends in Twitter usage and crime. We estimate national level regressions with differential effects on GBV-related and non-GBV-related crimes within the same week, as well as regressions at the state-by-week level controlling for state and month fixed effects. Our main findings reveal that GBV-related tweets led to a small but significant short-term decrease in GBV-related crime reports. Further analysis suggests that the decrease is attributable to a reduction in actual crime rather than in reporting behavior.

Confronting controversial content: Examining online narratives and frames in #CancelSpotify and #NetflixWalkout

In 2021, Netflix and Spotify became the center of debate over controversial content. As a form of protest, Twitter (X) users engaged in hashtag activism using #NetflixWalkout and #CancelSpotify. Hashtag activism provides online activists and organizers a mechanism to produce and disseminate (counter)narratives quickly. In both cases, users employed the hashtags to support the streaming services’ stances or pressure them to alter their activities. While previous studies have examined the use of hashtag activism in constructing narratives, particularly in larger social movements, much of this extant work focuses on one narrative, even though divergent and conflicting narratives emerge in these situations. To better understand how participants cultivate online discourse surrounding corporate connections to social issues, we analyze the primary competing narratives and supporting frames that emerged in #CancelSpotify and #NetflixWalkout. While the intended narrative reflected the organizers’ intentions, a counter narrative that challenged these intentions also emerged. Critically, the intended narrative was the primary driver of content and social media user engagement, suggesting that although hashtag activism has limitations and challenges, it also provides an avenue through which individuals can foster a narrative and reach audiences. In addition, findings revealed that individuals contributing to the intended narrative were more apt to provide mobilizing information than those participating in the counter narrative. However, mobilizing frames still featured less frequently than commentary-driven frames.

280 Characters of Contention: Analyzing Partisan Behavior on Twitter During Supreme Court Confirmation Processes

Abstract We analyze a cache of tweets from partisan users concerning the confirmation hearings of Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Using these original data, we investigate how Twitter users with partisan leanings interact with judicial nominations and confirmations. We find that these users tend to exhibit behavior consistent with offline partisan dynamics. Our analysis reveals that Democrats and Republicans express distinct emotional responses based on the alignment of nominees with their respective parties. Additionally, our study highlights the active participation of partisans in promoting politically charged topics throughout the confirmation process, starting from the vacancy stage.

Sentiment Analysis of Hate Speech against DPR-RI on Twitter Using Naive Bayes and KNN Algorithms

According to surveys, the rise in social media users has resulted in an increase of hate speech, and Twitter is one of the most popular platforms for this type of speech. The tweet feature on Twitter enables users to make repeated instances of hate speech, making Twitter data very intriguing to analyze. This study aims to investigate whether a tweet contains hate speech towards the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR-RI). The research employed crawling techniques to gather data from Twitter using the Twitter API feature. The Naïve Bayes algorithm was applied, and the results were compared with the accuracy of the K-Nearest Neighbor. After preprocessing, the total data obtained was 1,494, with 956 test data and 538 training data. The study revealed that Twitter users' sentiment towards DPR-RI was 49.2% positive and 50.8% negative sentiment when tested using Naïve Bayes. Meanwhile, KNN showed 23.4% positive and 76.6% negative sentiment. The high negative sentiment in both classifiers suggests that Twitter users frequently express hate speech towards DPR-RI. Naïve Bayes algorithm showed the highest prediction accuracy at 98.32%, while the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm had an accuracy of only 62.84%.

Understanding content dissemination on sensemaking: WHO’s social listening strategy on X during the initial phase of COVID-19

Abstract Purpose Guided by the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication model (CERC, Reynolds and Seeger 2005. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication 10(1). 43–55.), the present study aimed to study how X (formerly Twitter) users sensemaking and efficacy based message. Additionally, the study also aimed to understand how the World Health Organization (WHO) responded to the emerging conversation. Methods Unsupervised machine learning was conducted on 6.1 million tweets between January and March 2020 to understand sensemaking about COVID-19 among X users. Additionally, content analysis was used to examine if the World Health Organization (WHO) responded to popular emerging conversations via content on their own X handle. Findings The majority of dominant topics in COVID-19 tweets from January to March 2020 related to understanding the virus and the crisis it caused. X users tried to make sense of their surroundings and re-create their familiar world by framing events. Content analysis revealed that WHO engaged in effective social listening and responded quickly to dominant X conversations to help people make sense of the situation. Practical Implications The initial stage of COVID-19 pandemic was marked with uncertainty. However, WHO had a robust communication strategy and addressed the dominant conversation during the time frame including debunking misinformation. Originality/Value The present study fills the research gap by situating the themes in the context of the health crisis and extending the CERC model to user-generated content via the lens of sensemaking and efficacy messages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the study segmented the timelines into smaller time intervals to understand how sensemaking evolved over time.

LGBTQ Visibility Measured Consistently and Persistently in US Twitter Bios from 2012 through 2023

LGBTQ visibility is an often discussed but rarely quantified concept. Here we operationalize visibility as the prevalence of active social media accounts with an LGBTQ signifier in the profile bio and measure the prevalence of such accounts consistently and persistently at daily resolution over twelve years in the United States. We found that prevalence for the signifiers lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer increased. The term ‘gay’ grew most rapidly. Accounts with LGBTQ signifiers were especially visible on days corresponding to political or violent events. The rainbow flag emoji also increased in prevalence, including a notable ratchet each June (Pride Month). This work is a case study in ipseology – i.e. the study of human identity using large datasets and computational methods. Social scientists should embrace ipseology as a new opportunity to observe how people describe their selves to a public audience.

Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Users Towards the Kartu Prakerja Program Using the Naive Bayes Method

This study conducts a sentiment analysis of Twitter users regarding the Indonesian government’s Kartu Prakerja program, utilizing the Naive Bayes method for classification. Launched in 2020 to enhance employability skills amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, the program has garnered various public responses. A total of 836 tweets containing the keyword "Kartu Prakerja" were collected using the Twitter API and analyzed to determine sentiment distribution. Results indicate a predominance of neutral sentiment (800 tweets), with only 17 positive and 22 negative tweets. The Naive Bayes method achieved an accuracy of 95%, demonstrating its effectiveness in sentiment classification. However, comparisons with other methods, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), reveal that these techniques yield higher accuracy rates (98.34% and 96%, respectively). This research highlights the importance of sentiment analysis in understanding public perceptions and informs policymakers about areas needing improvement. The findings underscore the potential of integrating advanced machine learning techniques to enhance sentiment analysis and provide insights into the effectiveness of government programs like Kartu Prakerja.

The offline roots of online hostility: Adult and childhood administrative records correlate with individual-level hostility on Twitter

Reducing hostility in social media interactions is a key public concern. Most extant research emphasizes how online contextual factors breed hostility. Here, we take a different perspective and focus on the offline roots of hostility, that is, offline experiences and stable individual-level dispositions. Using a unique dataset of Danish Twitter users (N [Formula: see text] 4,931), we merge data from administrative government registries with a behavioral measure of online hostility. We demonstrate that individuals with more aggressive dispositions (as proxied by having many more criminal verdicts) are more hostile in social media conversations. We also find evidence that features of childhood environments predict online hostility. Time spent in foster care is a strong correlate, while other indicators of childhood instability (e.g., the number of moves and divorced parents) are not. Furthermore, people from more resourceful childhood environments-those with better grades in primary school and higher parental socioeconomic status-are more hostile on average, as such people are more politically engaged. These results offer an important reminder that much online hostility is rooted in offline experiences and stable dispositions. They also provide anuanced view of the core group of online aggressors. While these individuals display general antisocial personality tendencies by having many more criminal verdicts, they also come from resourceful backgrounds more often than not.

Tweet Like It’s Free: Civic Imagination in the 2021 Palestinian Unity Intifada

In June 2021, in the midst of the Palestinian Unity Intifada, Twitter users took to the platform to imagine a desired future in which Israel’s apartheid occupation and barriers fragmenting Palestinian communities no longer existed. The hashtag they used, #Tweet_Like_It’s_Free (#غرد_كانها_حرة), became an instant trend. In this article, the author examines a dataset of 600 of these tweets from June 2021 in order to explore the role of imagination in undoing fragmentation, emphasizing connection to the land, and disrupting a seemingly impenetrable status quo. The article argues that, despite limits to the use of digital media in the context of Israel’s settler-colonial occupation, playfulness and experimentation on social media are necessary political practices. Imaginative tweets do more than paint a picture; they narrate people’s right to movement and to hope, and reinforce their connection to the land and to each other across geographically fragmented communities in historic Palestine and the diaspora.

Analysis of Software Developers' Programming Language Preferences and Community Behavior From Big5 Personality Traits

ABSTRACTMany programming languages and technologies have appeared for the purpose of software development. When choosing a programming language, the developers' cognitive attributes, such as the Big5 personality traits (BPT), may play a role. The developers' personality traits can be reflected in their social media content (e.g., tweets, statuses, Q&A, reputation). In this article, we predict the developers' programming language preferences (i.e., the pattern of picking up a language) from their BPT derived from their content produced on social media. We randomly collected data from a total of 820 Twitter (currently X) and Stack Overflow (SO) users. Then, we collected user features (i.e., BPT, word embedding of tweets) from Twitter and programming preferences (i.e., programming tags, reputation, question, answer) from SO. We applied various machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to predict their programming language preferences from their BPT. We also investigated other interesting insights, such as how reputation and question‐asking/replying are associated with the users' BPT. The findings suggest that developers with high openness, conscientiousness, and extraversion are inclined to mobile applications, object‐oriented programming, and web programming, respectively. Furthermore, developers with high openness and conscientiousness traits have a high reputation in the SO community. Our ML and DL techniques classify the developers' programming language preferences using their BPT with an average accuracy of 78%.

Psychological underpinnings of partisan bias in tie formation on social media.

Individuals preferentially reciprocate connections with copartisans versus counter-partisans online. However, the mechanisms underlying this partisan bias remain unclear. Do individuals simply prefer viewing politically congenial content, or do they additionally prefer socially connecting with copartisans? Is this driven by preference for in-party ties or distaste for out-party ties? In a Twitter (now called X) field experiment, we created bot accounts varying by partisanship and whether they identified as bots or humans. We randomly assigned Twitter users (N = 3,013) to be followed by one of these accounts. We found evidence for social motivation-users were much more likely to reciprocate links to copartisan relative to counter-partisan accounts when the accounts identified as humans versus bots. We also found evidence for both in-party preference and out-party dispreference-users were as likely to follow back copartisan accounts as they were unlikely to followback counter-partisan accounts, compared to politically neutral accounts. A follow-up survey experiment (N = 990) provides further evidence for distinct roles of issue polarization, out-party animosity, and in-party affinity in moderating follow-back decisions online. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Y/N and OOMFs: Development, Maintenance, and Consequences of Parasocial Relationships on Stan Twitter

The study examines Stan Twitter users’ sense of belonging and their likelihood of creating PSRs as a substitute for real-life connections lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A convergent mixed-method design: specifically, the parallel databases variant was used to test the hypothesis and explore research questions. Conducted in January 2022, the study involved online interviews via Zoom with participants from the Philippines. Participants included Stan Twitter users (N = 126) and non-Stan Twitter users (N = 111), all at least 18 years old. Additionally, qualitative interviews were conducted with Stan Twitter users (N = 12) to explore PSRs in depth. Quantitative results (t = 0.548; p = 0.584) indicate no significant difference in the need to belong between the samples; Pandemic (i.e., period) and generational (i.e., Gen Z) effects are seen as contributors. Qualitative results show that PSRs develop due to fulfillment of belongingness needs and other factors, are maintained through parasocial interactions and fandom activities, and have both negative and positive implications for stans’ relationships, fandom behavior, personal growth, and well-being. The findings suggest reinforcing cybersecurity measures and potentially redefining PSRs due to their perceived reciprocation.

Do political elite endorsements influence online mobilization? A study of Twitter behavior in Narendra Modi’s 2019 election campaigns

ABSTRACT Modern campaigns increasingly rely on social media to influence voters, with Twitter offering affordances that enable direct communication between politicians and the public. However, scholars remain divided over the effectiveness of engaging ordinary Twitter users for mobilizing support online. This article seeks to address this issue by examining whether endorsements from political elites influence the tweeting behavior of ordinary users. Using a quasi-experimental design, we analyze an original dataset of tweets made by users who were mentioned (N = 27,634; 36.62 million tweets) and not mentioned (N = 27,672; 16.30 million tweets) by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 16th March 2019, during his national election campaign. Our analysis reveals that, on average, users mentioned by Modi exhibited a greater increase in tweet activity compared to those not mentioned. However, this surge in activity proved to be only temporary, suggesting that mentions by political elites facilitate immediate mobilization but are not necessarily self-sustaining. Furthermore, no evidence was found of a differential effect based on users’ pre-existing engagement levels. Our findings offer important insights into political leaders’ strategic use of Twitter in campaigns and contribute to the theoretical understanding of Twitter's role in mobilization and interactivity by bringing in diverse perspectives from the Global South.

Comparison of Pre-Defined Automatic Machine Learning (AutoML) for MBTI Personality Prediction of Twitter Users using Binary Classification Approach

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a personality test that is globally accepted and used as a method for identifying personality. MBTI uses a four-factor linear model to characterize a person's behaviour patterns. This feature is often used to pursue career opportunities, make decisions, manage leadership, and deal with stress. In particular, MBTI personality prediction has been widely conducted and well performed using Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) based on Twitter data because it indirectly reveals most of a person's personality through their tweets. However, deep understanding is needed in building RNN-based solutions. Hence it will take a lot of time and resources to produce an excellent model architecture and the parameters used. Therefore, this study proposed the Auto Machine Learning (AutoML) method with a pre-defined search space to determine the correct model architecture and hyperparameters based on the results of data analysis. Thus, the search algorithm can exploit environments with suitable configurations in general. There are two pre-defined search spaces employed in this study, i.e. (i) two RNN algorithms, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and (ii) pre-trained Word2Ves as word embedding. In addition, this study compares the model's performance that employs preprocessing and raw data (without preprocessing). The first result shows that the preprocessing increases the F1-Score values for LSTM and GRU by 2.35% and 2.02%, respectively. Subsequently, the LSTM outperformed GRU by the values of F1-Score at 0.35% and accuracy at 0.76%. The implementation of LSTM with pre-processed data in pre-defined AutoML with Word2Vec as a word embedding technique can provide good performance on long and complex data sequences such as Twitter data for predicting its user personality.

What Are the Most Popular Articles in Urogynecology and Who Is Disseminating Them

Importance This research describes which articles published in Urogynecology are garnering the most attention online. Understanding which articles are having the largest impact in the online community has become increasingly important due to the exponential increase in the use of social media on the internet. Objective The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a quantitative and qualitative measure of the articles’ online attention in social media and news outlets, blogs, and reference managers. The aim of this study was to provide an analysis of those accessing and sharing the 100 most popular articles published in Urogynecology. Study Design This was a retrospective descriptive analysis. Using Dimensions, a “linked research knowledge system,” data about each article’s demographics on Twitter and other media sources was extracted from each of the articles within Urogynecology with the highest AAS. No articles were excluded. The articles were categorized by topic and metrics of online sharing were compared among categories. Results Fifteen categories were created. Sexual health and education articles had the highest average Altmetric scores per article and reached the highest impressions per article and had the highest average follower count per Twitter user. On average, social justice in medicine had the highest number of tweets per article. Tweets were most often composed by members of the public (58%) compared with health care practitioners (14%), researchers (13%), and science communicators (12%). Conclusions Sexual health and education articles had the highest average AAS and impressions on Twitter. We observed a difference in which articles are being shared most among the general public and health care professionals. The general public comprised a majority of those sharing articles online regardless of category. Additionally, there may be a disparity in research, its funding, and online scientific communications within the field of urogynecology.

Assessment of beliefs and attitudes towards benzodiazepines using machine learning based on social media posts: an observational study

BackgroundBenzodiazepines are frequently prescribed drugs; however, their prolonged use can lead to tolerance, dependence, and other adverse effects. Despite these risks, long-term use remains common, presenting a public health concern. This study aims to explore the beliefs and opinions held by the public regarding benzodiazepines, as understanding these perspectives may provide insights into their usage patterns.MethodsWe collected public tweets published in English between January 1, 2019, and October 31, 2020, that mentioned benzodiazepines. The content of each tweet and the characteristics of the users were analyzed using a mixed-method approach, including manual analysis and semi-supervised machine learning.ResultsOver half of the Twitter users highlighted the efficacy of benzodiazepines, with minimal discussion of their side effects. The most active participants in these conversations were patients and their families, with health professionals and institutions being notably absent. Additionally, the drugs most frequently mentioned corresponded with those most commonly prescribed by healthcare professionals.ConclusionsSocial media platforms offer valuable insights into users’ experiences and opinions regarding medications. Notably, the sentiment towards benzodiazepines is predominantly positive, with users viewing them as effective while rarely mentioning side effects. This analysis underscores the need to educate physicians, patients, and their families about the potential risks associated with benzodiazepine use and to promote clinical guidelines that support the proper management of these medications.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.

Racial Minorities Face Discrimination From Across the Political Spectrum When Seeking to Form Ties on Social Media: Evidence From a Field Experiment

We conducted a preregistered field experiment examining racial discrimination in tie formation on social media. We randomly assigned research accounts varying on race (Black, White) and politics (liberal/Democrat, conservative/Republican, neutral) to follow a politically balanced sample of Twitter (i.e., X) users (N = 5,951) who were unaware they were in a research study. We examined three predictions from the social and political psychology literatures: i) individuals favor White over Black targets, ii) this tendency is stronger for conservatives/Republicans than for liberals/Democrats, and iii) greater discrimination by conservatives/Republicans is explained by the assumption that racial minorities are liberal/Democrat. We found evidence that individuals were less likely to reciprocate social ties with Black accounts than White accounts. However, this tendency was not moderated by individuals’ political orientation, shared partisanship, or partisan mismatch. In sum, this work provides field experimental evidence for racial discrimination in tie formation on social media by individuals across political backgrounds.

Tweeting, talking, or doing politics? Testing the influence of communication on democratic engagement

Being politically and civically engaged is known to benefit society. Using online forums, such as Twitter (the social media platform now known as X), for democratic engagement is now commonplace. However, research is inconclusive on whether offline and online activities similarly result in real-world engagement. Using secondary analysis of Pew data, both types of engagement are compared among Twitter users. Results show Twitter users engaged online, but not offline. However, those who posted about political/social issues democratically engaged both offline and online.

Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic: main topics published in Portuguese and Italian on Twitter

Aim: Analyze published topics about mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic in public posts in Portuguese and Italian on Twitter. Methodology: Study of qualitative, cross-sectional approach, developed from the analysis of public Twitter posts in Portuguese and Italian language about mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. The data were extracted, transcribed and the content were analyzed from Thematic Analysis. Results: A total of 430 Twitter posts were analyzed and five categories were created: Diverse criticisms about behavior and public policies; Restrictions and privations; The (in)attention to mental health care; Burnout, exhaustion, and emotional overload and Impact of the pandemic on education. Conclusion: The analyses showed impacts in different spheres of life of Twitter users in both countries, mainly in aspects related to mental health care in the virtual environment.

Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions.

In response to intense pressure, technology companies have enacted policies to combat misinformation1-4. The enforcement of these policies has, however, led to technology companies being regularly accused of political bias5-7. We argue that differential sharing of misinformation by people identifying with different political groups8-15 could lead to political asymmetries in enforcement, even by unbiased policies. We first analysed 9,000 politically active Twitter users during the US 2020 presidential election. Although users estimated to be pro-Trump/conservative were indeed substantially more likely to be suspended than those estimated to be pro-Biden/liberal, users who were pro-Trump/conservative also shared far more links to various sets of low-quality news sites-even when news quality was determined by politically balanced groups of laypeople, or groups of only Republican laypeople-and had higher estimated likelihoods of being bots. We find similar associations between stated or inferred conservatism and low-quality news sharing (on the basis of both expert and politically balanced layperson ratings) in 7 other datasets of sharing from Twitter, Facebook and survey experiments, spanning 2016 to 2023 and including data from 16 different countries. Thus, even under politically neutral anti-misinformation policies, political asymmetries in enforcement should be expected. Political imbalance in enforcement need not imply bias on the part of social media companies implementing anti-misinformation policies.