Twin-coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Research Articles

Visuomotor integration in early Alzheimer's disease: A TMS study

Background and purposeCortical visuomotor integration is altered in Alzheimer's disease (AD), even at an early stage of the disease. The aim of this study was to assess the connections between the primary visual (V1) and motor (M1) areas in patients with early AD using a paired-pulse, twin-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique. MethodsVisuomotor connections (VMCs) were assessed in 13 subjects with probable AD and 16 healthy control subjects. A conditioning stimulus over the V1 phosphene hotspot was followed at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 18 and 40 ms by a test stimulus over M1, to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle. ResultsSignificant effects due to VMCs, consisting of enhanced MEP suppression at ISI of 18 and 40 ms, were observed in the AD patients. Patients with AD showed an excessive inhibitory response of the right M1 to inputs travelling from V1 at given ISIs. ConclusionsThis study provides neurophysiological evidence of altered functional connectivity between visual and motor areas in AD.

Cortical visuomotor interactions in Freezing of Gait: A TMS approach

Altered cortical visuomotor integration has been involved in the pathophysiology of freezing of gait (FoG) in parkinsonism. The aim of this study was to assess the connections between the primary visual (V1) and motor (M1) areas with a paired-pulse, twin-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique in patients with FoG. Twelve Parkinson's disease (PD) patients suffering from levodopa-responsive-FoG (off-FoG) were compared with 12 PD patients without FoG and 12 healthy subjects of similar age/sex. In the "off" condition, visuomotor connections (VMCs) were assessed bilaterally. A conditioning stimulus over the V1 phosphene hotspot was followed at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 18 and 40ms by a test stimulus over M1, to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle. Significant (P<0.01), bilateral effects due to VMCs were detected in all three groups, consisting of a MEP suppression at ISI 18 and 40ms. However, in PD patients with FoG, the MEP suppression was significantly (P<0.05) enhanced, both at ISI 18-40ms, in comparison with the other two groups. The phenomenon was limited to the right hemisphere. PD patients with FoG showed an excessive inhibitory response of the right M1 to inputs travelling from V1 at given ISIs. Right-sided alterations of the cortical visuomotor integration may contribute to the pathophysiology of FoG.

Assessing cTBS virtual lesioning effects on parietal cortices and its ability to shift spatial attention

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is being considered as a potential treatment for spatial neglect by restoring the normal balance of interhemispheric inhibition across right / left posterior parietal cortices (PPC). Recent studies suggest the observed hyperactivity of the left hemisphere may result from neuroplastic change, rather than a release of inhibition. The present study investigates attentional theories in healthy individuals by administering continuous-TBS to induce a virtual lesion and probing excitability connections of the PPC to the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) bilaterally, using twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Any behavioural changes from pre/post cTBS will be assessed by the landmark task and the bilateral perceptual decision making paradigm. Preliminary data suggests cTBS altered spatial attention in individuals with initial pseudoneglect, whilst any effect on PPC excitability levels is currently inconclusive. In conclusion, these results may have implications for cTBS effectiveness whilst also aiding further knowledge on the effects of cTBS on the contralateral unstimulated hemisphere. As cTBS was effective in altering spatial preference immediately, it is possible that spatial neglect arises due to a release of inhibition to the left PPC rather than due to neuroplasticity changes.

Subclinical recurrent neck pain and its treatment impacts motor training-induced plasticity of the cerebellum and motor cortex.

The cerebellum processes pain inputs and is important for motor learning. Yet, how the cerebellum interacts with the motor cortex in individuals with recurrent pain is not clear. Functional connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex can be measured by a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique in which stimulation is applied to the cerebellum prior to stimulation over the motor cortex, which inhibits motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by motor cortex stimulation alone, called cerebellar inhibition (CBI). Healthy individuals without pain have been shown to demonstrate reduced CBI following motor acquisition. We hypothesized that CBI would not reduce to the same extent in those with mild-recurrent neck pain following the same motor acquisition task. We further hypothesized that a common treatment for neck pain (spinal manipulation) would restore reduced CBI following motor acquisition. Motor acquisition involved typing an eight-letter sequence of the letters Z,P,D,F with the right index finger. Twenty-seven neck pain participants received spinal manipulation (14 participants, 18–27 years) or sham control (13 participants, 19–24 years). Twelve healthy controls (20–27 years) also participated. Participants had CBI measured; they completed manipulation or sham control followed by motor acquisition; and then had CBI re-measured. Following motor acquisition, neck pain sham controls remained inhibited (58 ± 33% of test MEP) vs. healthy controls who disinhibited (98 ± 49% of test MEP, P<0.001), while the spinal manipulation group facilitated (146 ± 95% of test MEP, P<0.001). Greater inhibition in neck pain sham vs. healthy control groups suggests that neck pain may change cerebellar-motor cortex interaction. The change to facilitation suggests that spinal manipulation may reverse inhibitory effects of neck pain.

Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

The cerebellum controls descending motor commands by outputs to primary motor cortex (M1) and the brainstem in response to sensory feedback. The cerebellum may also modulate afferent input en route to M1 and the brainstem. The objective of this study is to determine if anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the cerebellum influences cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), short afferent inhibition (SAI) and trigeminal reflexes (TRs) in healthy adults. Data from two studies evaluating effects of cerebellar anodal and sham tDCS are presented. The first study used a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol to investigate CBI and combined TMS and cutaneous stimulation of the digit to assess SAI. The second study evaluated effects on trigemino-cervical and trigemino-masseter reflexes using peripheral nerve stimulation of the face. Fourteen right-handed healthy adults participated in experiment 1. CBI was observed at baseline and was reduced by anodal cerebellar DCS only (P < 0.01). There was SAI at interstimulus intervals of 25 and 30ms at baseline (both P < 0.0001), but cerebellar tDCS had no effect. Thirteen right-handed healthy adults participated in experiment 2. Inhibitory reflexes were evoked in the ipsilateral masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles. There was no effect of cerebellar DCS on either reflex. Anodal DCS reduced CBI but did not change SAI or TRs in healthy adults. These results require confirmation in individuals with neurological impairment.

Mapping Different Intra-Hemispheric Parietal-Motor Networks Using Twin Coil TMS

BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests anatomical and functional differences in connectivity between the anterior and posterior parts of the inferior-parietal lobule (IPL) and the frontal motor areas. Objective/HypothesisThis study investigates whether different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor interactions can be observed along the anterior–posterior axis of the IPL in the resting human brain. MethodsWe use a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to test intra-hemispheric interactions between three points adjacent to the intra-parietal sulcus (anterior, central, posterior) and the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) at rest in both hemispheres. ResultsWe found that stimulation of the anterior IPL resulted in an inhibition of the ipsilateral M1 in both hemispheres. Stimulation of the central and posterior IPL resulted in a facilitatory effect on ipsilateral M1 in the left but not for the right hemisphere. Additionally we show that there is considerable inter-subject variability concerning the optimal parietal facilitatory and inhibitory position. ConclusionsThe IPL has distinct inhibitory and facilitatory connections to the ipsilateral M1. Whereas inhibitory connections are observed in both hemispheres, facilitatory connections are asymmetric. These parietal-motor networks may represent the basis for the functional differences between these regions in reaching and grasping tasks and mirror the functional asymmetry observed in the motor system. From a practical point of view, we note that the inter-subject variability means that future TMS studies of the parietal area might consider a hot-spot localization similar to the procedures commonly used for M1.

Impaired inter-hemispheric facilitatory connectivity in schizophrenia

ObjectivesTo investigate the inter-hemispheric connections between the dorsal premotor cortex (dPM) and contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) in schizophrenia. MethodsSixteen medicated, nine unmedicated schizophrenia patients and 20 healthy age-matched subjects were studied by twin-coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. To activate distinct facilitatory and inhibitory transcallosal pathways between dPM and the contralateral M1, the intensity of dPM stimulation was adjusted to be either suprathreshold (110% of resting motor threshold) or subthreshold (80% of active motor threshold). Interstimulus intervals between conditioning stimulus and test stimulus were 6, 8 and 15ms. ResultsSchizophrenia patients had comparable efficacy of the inhibitory pathway. On the other hand, medicated patients showed less facilitation of contralateral M1 following dPM stimulation at 80% of active motor threshold, at interstimulus interval=8ms. The individual amount of facilitation induced by dPM conditioning at 80% of active motor threshold at interstimulus interval=8ms correlated negatively with negative symptoms. ConclusionsInter-hemispheric facilitatory dPM–M1 connectivity is selectively altered in schizophrenia. SignificanceThis study produced evidence that dPM–M1 connectivity is dysfunctional and that correlates with negative symptoms. These results converge with previous studies which strongly hypothesize that inter- and intra-hemispheric connectivity disturbances may play a major role in schizophrenia.

TMS activation of interhemispheric pathways between the posterior parietal cortex and the contralateral motor cortex

Using a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (tc-TMS) approach we have previously demonstrated that facilitation may be detected in the primary motor cortex (M1) following stimulation over the ipsilateral caudal intraparietal sulcus (cIPS). Here we tested the interhemispheric interactions between the IPS and the contralateral motor cortex (M1). We found that conditioning the right cIPS facilitated contralateral M1 when the conditioning stimulus had an intensity of 90% resting motor threshold (RMT) but not at 70% or 110% RMT. Facilitation was maximal when the interstimulus interval (ISI) between cIPS and M1 was 6 or 12 ms. These facilitatory effects were mediated by interactions with specific groups of interneurons in the contralateral M1. In fact, short intracortical inhibition (SICI) was reduced following cIPS stimulation. Moreover, additional comparison of facilitation of responses evoked by anterior-posterior versus posterior-anterior stimulation of M1 suggested that facilitation was more effective on early I1/I2 circuits than on I3 circuits. In contrast to these effects, stimulation of anterior IPS (aIPS) at 90% RMT induced inhibition, instead of facilitation, of contralateral M1 at ISIs of 10-12 ms. Finally, we found similar facilitation between left cIPS and right M1 although the conditioning stimuli had to have a higher intensity compared with stimulation of right cIPS (110% instead of 90% RMT). These findings demonstrate that different subregions of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in humans exert both facilitatory and inhibitory effects towards the contralateral primary motor cortex. These corticocortical projections could contribute to a variety of motor tasks such as bilateral manual coordination, movement planning in space and grasping.

Abnormal parieto-motor connectivity in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Abnormal connectivity might be involved in the pathophysiology of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC). We used twin-coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation protocol to investigate connectivity between posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and motor cortex (M1) in TSC patients. In comparison with healthy subjects and TSC patients treated with antiepileptic drugs, non-medicated TSC patients exhibited abnormal excitability of PPC-M1 connection. Such altered connectivity might play a role in TSC epileptic phenotype.

Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect

Hemispatial neglect is common after unilateral brain damage, particularly to perisylvian structures in the right-hemisphere (RH). In this disabling syndrome, behaviour and awareness are biased away from the contralesional side of space towards the ipsilesional side. Theoretical accounts of this in terms of hemispheric rivalry have speculated that the intact left-hemisphere (LH) may become hyper-excitable after a RH lesion, due to release of inhibition from the damaged hemisphere. We tested this directly using a novel twin-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approach to measure excitability within the intact LH of neglect patients. This involved applying a conditioning TMS pulse over left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), in order to test its effect on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a subsequent test pulse over left motor cortex (M1). Twelve RH stroke patients with neglect, an age-matched group of eight RH stroke patients without neglect, and 10 healthy controls were examined. We found that excitability of left PPC-M1 circuits was higher in neglect patients than the other groups, and related to the degree of neglect on clinical cancellation tests. A follow-up found that 1 Hz repetitive TMS over left PPC normalized this over-excitability, and also ameliorated visual neglect on an experimental measure with chimeric objects. Our results provide 'direct' evidence for pathological over-excitability of the LH in the neglect syndrome, as quantified by left PPC influences on left M1, with implications for possible treatment.

Connectivity Between Posterior Parietal Cortex and Ipsilateral Motor Cortex Is Altered in Schizophrenia

Recent advances have highlighted the hypothesis of schizophrenia as a disorder causing defective connectivity among distinct cortical regions. Neurophysiological evidence supporting this hypothesis, however, is still lacking. In the present study, we used a novel twin-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (tcTMS) approach to investigate ipsilateral parieto-motor connectivity in 20 schizophrenic patients (14 medicated, 6 unmedicated) and in 15 healthy age-matched volunteers. In healthy subjects, a conditioning TMS pulse applied over the ipsilateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC) at 90% of resting motor threshold (RMT) intensity was able to increase the excitability of the hand area of the right primary motor cortex, with peaks at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 4 and 15 msec. This paradigm of stimulation failed to reveal any facilitatory parieto-motor interaction in medicated and unmedicated schizophrenic patients. The between-group difference in paired-pulse facilitation was not ISI-specific. In following analyses, we found that the effects across ISIs induced by PPC conditioning at 90% RMT correlated with the Global Assessment Functioning score and with the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, showing that patients with a better global functioning and lower negative symptoms had less impaired connectivity. Moreover the same parameter correlated with illness duration. Parieto-motor connectivity is impaired in schizophrenia. Cortico-cortical disconnection might be a core feature of schizophrenia.