Tumor Necrosis Factor-blocking Agents Research Articles

How do dose reduction and discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor-blocking (anti-TNF) agents affect people with low disease activity rheumatoid arthritis?

How do dose reduction and discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor-blocking (anti-TNF) agents affect people with low disease activity rheumatoid arthritis?

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are effective in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they are associated with (dose-dependent) adverse effects and high costs. To prevent overtreatment, several trials have assessed the effectiveness of down-titration compared with continuation of the standard dose. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation or disease activity guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) on disease activity, functioning, costs, safety and radiographic damage compared with usual care in patients with RA and low disease activity. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Issue 8, 2013; Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 8 September 2013); EMBASE (1947 to 8 September 2013); Science Citation Index (Web of Science); and conference proceedings of the American College of Rheumatology (2005 to 2012) and European League against Rheumatism (2005 to 2013). We contacted authors of the seven included studies to ask for additional information on their study; five responded. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing down-titration (dose reduction, discontinuation, disease activity-guided dose tapering) of anti-TNF agents (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab) to usual care/no down-titration in patients with RA and a low disease activity state. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs and one CCT (total 1203 participants), reporting anti-TNF down-titration, were included. Three studies (559 participants) reported anti-TNF dose reduction compared with anti-TNF continuation. Five studies (732 participants) reported anti-TNF discontinuation compared with anti-TNF continuation (two studies assessed both anti-TNF discontinuation and dose reduction), and one study assessed disease activity-guided anti-TNF dose tapering (137 participants). These studies include only adalimumab and etanercept; controlled data on other anti-TNF agents are absent. Two studies were available in full text; one was assessed as having low risk of bias and the other high risk. Five studies were available only as one or more abstracts. Because data provided in these abstracts were limited, risk of bias was unclear. Clinical heterogeneity between the trials was high.Dose reduction of anti-TNF (etanercept data only) showed no statistically significant or clinical relevant difference in disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) (mean difference (MD) 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.11 to 0.31) (scale 0.9 to 8; higher score indicates worse disease activity). The proportion of participants who maintained low disease activity was slightly lower among participants given reduced doses of the anti-TNF agent (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.98, absolute risk difference (ARD) 9%). Radiographic outcome was slightly worse, but this was not clinically meaningful, compared with continuation of anti-TNF (MD 0.11, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.14) (scale 0 to 448; higher score indicates greater joint damage). Function was not statistically different between anti-TNF dose reduction and continuation (MD 0.10, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.20) (scale 0 to 3; higher score indicates worse functioning). Reinstalment of anti-TNF after failure of dose reduction showed a 5% risk of persistent flare. Data on numbers of serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.45, ARD -2%) and withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs) (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.17 to 1,92, ARD -1%) were inconclusive. Most outcomes were based on moderate quality evidence.Participants who discontinued anti-TNF (adalimumab and etanercept data) had higher mean DAS28 (DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): MD 1.10, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.34) and DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP): MD 0.57 95% CI -0.09 to 1.23) and were less likely to maintain a low disease activity state (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.68, ARD 40%). Also, radiographic and functional outcomes are worse after anti-TNF discontinuation (MD 0.66, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.69, and MD 0.30, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.41, respectively). Data on numbers of SAEs (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.63, ARD 2%) and withdrawals due to AEs (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.23 to 2.24, ARD -1%) were inconclusive. Most outcomes were based on moderate quality evidence.The one study comparing disease activity-guided anti-TNF dose tapering (adalimumab and etanercept data) reported no statistically significant differences in functional outcomes (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.42). Significantly higher mean disease activity was found amon

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity.

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity.

AB1165 Tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents in persistent oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Results from the dutch arthritis and biologicals in children register

BackgroundCurrently, biological agents are not approved for the treatment of persistent oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (oJIA). However, there are persistent oJIA patients unresponsive to the conventional treatment consisting of NSAIDs,...

Three-dimensional Volumetric Ultrasound: A Valid Method for Blinded Assessment of Response to Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

To assess the responsiveness and repeatability of volumetric power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) evaluation of synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Twenty-three patients with RA (19 women, mean age 52.7 ± 12.6 yrs, mean disease duration 10.1 ± 8.6 yrs) were prospectively enrolled. All patients were beginning therapy with rituximab because of disease activity despite therapy with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory, and volumetric PDUS examination at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Ten centers participated in the study. Four centers recruited the patients and performed the volumetric acquisitions of PDUS images, while the remaining 6 centers assessed the PDUS volumes, blinded to the identity of patients and date of the visits. The most symptomatic hand and foot were scored for B-mode synovitis, synovial PD signal, and bone erosions. The repeatability of the volumetric PDUS assessment was investigated. An overall improvement in clinical and PDUS measurements was found at the followup assessments. The mean indexes for synovial PD signal and bone erosions and the number of sites with abnormalities decreased significantly throughout the followup (p < 0.05). The intraacquisition, intrareader reliability was excellent for all PDUS measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.9). The results of our pilot study suggest that volumetric PDUS can be responsive and repeatable in multicenter cohort studies of RA. This technique may minimize assessment biases and reduce acquisition variability in open-label and observational studies.

Tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents in persistent oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children Register

Because TNF inhibitors are not approved for persistent oligoarticular JIA (oJIA), although they are used off-label, we evaluated their effectiveness in patients in this category. Persistent oJIA patients were selected from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children (ABC) register, an ongoing multicentre prospective study that aims to include all Dutch children with JIA using biologic agents. Response was assessed by the JIA core-set disease activity variables and modified Wallace criteria for inactive disease. Until February 2011, 16 persistent oJIA patients (68.8% females) had been included in the register. Median age of onset was 8.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-13.5 years]; history of uveitis in 18.8%; ANA-positive 56.3%. All had previously used MTX, and 81.3% had used IA CSs. Median follow-up after the introduction of biologic treatment was 13.7 months (IQR 8.3-16.7 months). Fourteen patients started etanercept and two patients who had active arthritis as well as uveitis started adalimumab. Although patients with persistent oJIA had few affected joints [median of two active joints at the start of biologic (IQR 1-3)], the patient/parent assessments of pain [median visual analogue score (VAS) 51 (IQR 1-64)] and well-being [median VAS 44 (IQR 6-66)] were high. Additionally, their physician evaluated the disease activity as moderately high [median VAS 36 (IQR 4-65)]. After 3 months this decreased to 0 (IQR 0-30) and 63% achieved inactive disease. After 15 months the disease was inactive in 9/10 observed patients. TNF inhibitors were tolerated well. TNF blocking agents seem an effective and justifiable option in persistent oJIA when treatment with IA CS injections and MTX has failed.

Patients with Arthritis Undergoing Surgery: How Should We Manage Tumour Necrosis Factor Blocking Agents Perioperatively?-A Systematic Literature Review

We systematically reviewed the literature on the infectious risk in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor blocking agents (TNF-BA) undergoing surgery: we searched the Medline (PubMed) and the online archive from the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology and the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. Of total 1259 reports, 14 were finally analysed. With one exception all were retrospective. Four of 6 studies compared patients on TNF-BA with those not receiving TNF-BA, and found an increased risk of infection with the use of TNF-BA. None of the other studies which compared continued with discontinued treatment at surgery found an increased risk of infection, when the medication was continued perioperatively. In conclusion, while in theory there is an increased risk of infections when TNF-BA are administered perioperatively, the available literature does not necessarily support this. It rather appears that patients receiving TNF-BA are a priori at a higher risk of postoperative infections. Scheduling surgery at the end of the drug interval and adding one "safety" week prior to surgery should be an acceptable plan in daily clinical practice.

Tumor Necrosis Factor-blocking Agents for Children with Enthesitis-related Arthritis — Data from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children Register, 1999–2010

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of biological agents in children with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA). All patients with ERA in whom a biological agent was initiated between 1999 and 2010 were selected from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children (ABC) register. In this ongoing multicenter observational register, data on the course of the disease and medication use are retrieved prospectively at the start of the biological agent, after 3 months, and yearly thereafter. Inactive disease was assessed in accordance with the Wallace criteria. Twenty-two patients with ERA started taking 1 or more biological agents: 20 took etanercept, 2 took adalimumab (1 switched from etanercept to adalimumab), and 2 took infliximab (1 switched from etanercept to infliximab). Characteristics: 77% were male, 77% had enthesitis, 68% were HLA-B27-positive. The median age of onset was 10.4 (IQR 9.4-12.0) years; median followup from the start of the biological agent was 1.2 (IQR 0.5-2.4) years. Intention-to-treat analysis shows that inactive disease was achieved in 7 of 22 patients (32%) after 3 months, 5 of 13 patients (38%) after 15 months, and 5 of 8 patients (63%) after 27 months of treatment. Two patients discontinued etanercept because of ineffectiveness, and switched to adalimumab (inactive disease achieved) or infliximab (decline in joints with arthritis after 3 months of treatment). One patient discontinued etanercept because of remission, but had flare and restarted treatment, with good clinical response. No serious adverse events occurred. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents seem effective and safe for patients with ERA that was previously unresponsive to 1 or more DMARD. However, a sustained disease-free state could not be achieved, and none discontinued TNF-blocking agents successfully.

Update 2011: leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis – strengths and weaknesses

Leflunomide is often used as a first choice disease-modifying antirheumatic drug after methotrexate. New data are available for efficacy and safety in both, monotherapy and combination with biologicals. New data on efficacy demonstrate comparable effect sizes for leflunomide and methotrexate in the treatment of signs and symptoms in combination with tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents and rituximab. Equipotency has also been demonstrated by a recent radiographic outcome study on methotrexate and leflunomide monotherapy. Pharmacogenetic studies indicate an impact of polymorphisms on the variability in serum levels of the compound with potential relevance to effectiveness and tolerability in individual patients. Genetic factors are also likely to contribute to the significantly increased risk for leflunomide-induced pulmonary disease reported in Asia. Because pre-existing interstitial lung disease as well as methotrexate-induced pneumonitis have been identified as risk factors for leflunomide-induced pulmonary disease, the use of leflunomide as an alternative to methotrexate is limited under these conditions. Effectiveness of leflunomide renders it a potent treatment option in rheumatoid arthritis. The known tolerability issues resulting in a less favourable adherence to therapy constitutes a weakness. However, documented data from large registries indicate that leflunomide is safe as far as the contraindications and recommendations for monitoring are regarded.

Treatment of refractory adult-onset still’s disease with tocilizumab: report of two cases and review of the literature

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is empirically treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents or anakinra. The monoclonal anti-interleukin (IL)-6 antibody tocilicumab (TOC) has recently been approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and may be an attractive therapeutic option for AOSD as well. We report two AOSD patients treated with TOC and review of the current data on the use of TOC in AOSD. TOC was applied to the first patient after failure of cloroquin, methotrexate, adalimumab and etanercept. The second patient received TOC because of inefficacious methotrexate treatment. TOC was well tolerated by both the patients, and no clinically significant side effects occurred. Including these two cases, a total of seven AOSD patients have been successfully treated with TOC so far. TOC may be a promising treatment option for AOSD patients refractory to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs anakinra and tumor necrosis factor-[Formula: see text].

The Reason for Discontinuation of the First Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Blocking Agent Does Not Influence the Effect of a Second TNF Blocking Agent in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

To investigate whether the reason for discontinuation of the first tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agent influences the effect of a second TNF blocking agent. Data were used from 2 Dutch registries including patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with TNF blocking agents. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on reason for discontinuation of the first: nonresponse, loss of response, or adverse events. The primary outcome was the change from baseline of the disease activity (by DAS28) at 6 months, corrected for the baseline DAS28 score. Secondary outcomes were the change from baseline at 3 months, EULAR response rates, and the percentages of patients who reached a DAS28 score < or = 3.2 at 3 and at 6 months. In total, 49 patients who failed due to nonresponse, 75 due to loss of response, and 73 due to adverse events were included. At 6 months, the change of DAS28 score from baseline did not differ significantly between the groups (-0.6 to -1.3; p > or = 0.173) and similar good and moderate response rates were found (12% to 18%, p > or = 0.523, and 34% to 55%, p > or = 0.078, respectively). The secondary outcomes were also comparable between the 3 groups. The results of our observational study suggest that a second TNF blocking agent may be effective after failure of the first, regardless of the reason for discontinuation of the first TNF blocking agent.

Tumor Necrosis Factor–Blocking Agents in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis

Letters15 January 2008Tumor Necrosis Factor–Blocking Agents in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell ArteritisRaashid A. Luqmani, DMRaashid A. Luqmani, DMFrom University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00019 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail IN RESPONSE:I am grateful to Drs. Salvarani and Hunder for raising the issue that their studies of infliximab in polymyalgia rheumatica and GCA were not designed to test a small treatment effect of the agent above that achieved from corticosteroid alone. If there is only a small treatment effect, a cost–benefit analysis is likely to conclude that infliximab does not have a clinically or statistically significant role in the management of polymyalgia rheumatica or GCA. If, on the other hand, the study demonstrated that severe complications, such as sight loss in GCA, could be prevented or that steroid toxicity ... Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Raashid A. Luqmani, DMAffiliations: From University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom.Disclosures: None disclosed. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoInfliximab for Maintenance of Glucocorticosteroid-Induced Remission of Giant Cell Arteritis Gary S. Hoffman , Maria C. Cid , Karen E. Rendt-Zagar , Peter A. Merkel , Cornelia M. Weyand , John H. Stone , Carlo Salvarani , Weichun Xu , Sudha Visvanathan , Mahboob U. Rahman , and Infliximab plus Prednisone or Placebo plus Prednisone for the Initial Treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica Carlo Salvarani , PierLuigi Macchioni , Carlo Manzini , Giuseppe Paolazzi , Aldo Trotta , Paolo Manganelli , Marco Cimmino , Roberto Gerli , Maria Grazia Catanoso , Luigi Boiardi , Fabrizio Cantini , Catherine Klersy , and Gene G. Hunder Treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis: Are We Any Further Forward? Raashid Luqmani Metrics 15 January 2008Volume 148, Issue 2Page: 168KeywordsBiopsyConflicts of interestCorticosteroid therapyCytokinesGiant cellsNecrosisPilot studiesPolymyalgia rheumaticaToxicityTumor necrosis factor ePublished: 15 January 2008 Issue Published: 15 January 2008 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2008 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Tumor Necrosis Factor–Blocking Agents in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis

Tumor Necrosis Factor–Blocking Agents in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis

Immunohistochemical analysis as a means to predict responsiveness to rituximab treatment

Anti-CD20-mediated B cell depletion with rituximab is a new and effective therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although B cells in peripheral blood (PB) are consistently depleted in all patients, the clinical effects are more heterogeneous, possibly related to differences in the depleting effects of lymphoid or solid tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate B cell depletion in different compartments (PB, bone marrow, and synovium) and determine predictive variables for responsiveness to rituximab therapy. Before and 12 weeks after rituximab treatment, samples of PB, bone marrow, and synovium were collected from 25 patients with RA refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents. CD19+ and CD20+ B cells in PB and bone marrow were measured by flow cytometric analysis, whereas CD79a+ and cytoplasmic CD20+ B cells in the synovium were stained by immunohistochemistry. The effects of rituximab on serum Ig and autoantibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Rituximab effectively depleted the CD20+ subset of B cells in the PB, bone marrow, and synovium of RA patients. Rituximab significantly reduced autoantibody production (anti-citrullinated protein antibodies [ACPAs] and rheumatoid factor [RF]), in part due to a nonspecific decrease in total Ig production. Importantly, positivity for circulating ACPA IgM, in combination with a high infiltration of CD79a+ B cells in the synovium, but not of CD138+ plasma cells, was a predictor of clinical outcome after rituximab treatment. ACPA IgM titers were independently associated with synovial infiltration of CD20-,CD79a+ B cells, but not with CD138+ plasma cells. These data provide novel insights into the mechanisms of CD20-mediated B cell depletion in the lymphoid and solid tissues of RA patients and suggest a pivotal role for ACPA IgM-producing plasmablasts in RA.

Psoriatic arthritis: Current topics

Psoriatic arthritis is a common inflammatory arthropathy that occurs in approximately 25% of psoriasis patients. Due to significant advances in therapeutics--mainly the advent of biologic therapy--the disease has been subject to intense investigation recently. This review summarizes recent investigations of disease pathogenesis and clinical treatment. Clinical responses to tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents appear robust and superior to traditional disease-modifying drug responses, whereas other interventions, such as costimulation blockade, require more investigation. The pathogenesis of the disease appears related to T helper 17-polarized immune responses that target skin, joints, and the enthesial compartment. Finally, new insights into the disorder's genetic antecedents are emerging as more cohorts of patients undergo advanced genetic screening methods.

Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Pathogenetic and Therapeutic Aspects

Therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aims at interfering with the disease process, namely inflammation and destruction of the joints, and thus at preventing long-term disability. Proinflammatory cytokines play a decisive role in the generation of the inflammatory and destructive response. Aside from traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and tumor necrosis factor-blocking agents, a number of targeted therapies are currently in evaluation, such as abatacept (interfering with co-stimulation), rituximab (an anti-B-cell agent) and tocilizumab (an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody). In phase II trials, all these agents have resulted in significant clinical improvement, and phase III trials have been partly completed with similar results and are partly on the way. Because none of these agents lead to good clinical responses in all patients and many patients have only relatively low degrees of response, it will still be a challenge to find the best therapeutic paths to combat the "inflammatory house of cards" of RA.