Tube Size Selection Research Articles

Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists

ABSTRACT Background The current discourse within the thoracic surgical and pulmonological communities pertains to a contentious debate over the optimal selection criteria for thoracostomy tube diameters utilized in the management of pleural effusions. A comprehensive examination of the variables that inform the clinical decision-making paradigm for the determination of appropriate chest tube calibers is imperative to enhance patient management and elevate the prognostic results. Objectives The objective of this inquiry is to elucidate the determinants that influence thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists in their selection of chest tube size for the management of pleural effusions. Methods This cross-sectional study was based on an electronic questionnaire that was sent to the targeted populations through e-mail or a professional WhatsApp. The survey assessed the considerations of chest tube size selection as well as the respective advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications related to each size. Results The conducted study encompassed participants, with a nearly even distribution between thoracic surgeons (49.1%) and pulmonologists (50.9%). Most of these practitioners are within tertiary-level medical institutions (82.1%). A preference for small-bore chest tubes (SBCT), defined as < 14 French (Fr), was indicated by 54.8% of participants. The drawbacks associated with SBCT, such as kinking (60%) and blockage (70%), influenced the decision-making process negatively, while pain was a significant factor in the selection against LBCT (64%). Ultrasound guidance was a positive influence for the selection of SBCT (55%). Complications associated with LBCT included visceral and vascular injuries (55.7%), wound infection (45.3%), re-expansion pulmonary edema (43.3%), and subcutaneous emphysema (57.5%). In contrast, malposition was a complication more commonly associated with SBCT (49.1%). Conclusion The decision regarding chest tube size was influenced by several critical factors which included the nature of pleural effusion, the volume of pleural fluid, and potential complications specific to the size of the chest tube used.

Chest Tube Size Selection: Evaluating Provider Practices, Treatment Efficacy, and Complications in Management of Thoracic Trauma.

The standard for managing traumatic pneumothorax (PTX), hemothorax (HTX), and hemopneumothorax (HPTX) has historically been large-bore (LB) chest tubes (>20-Fr). Previous studies have shown equal efficacy of small-bore (SB) chest tubes (≤19-Fr) in draining PTX and HTX/HPTX. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, treatment efficacy, and complications related to the selection of chest tube sizes for patients with thoracic trauma. A retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients who underwent tube thoracostomy for traumatic PTX, HTX, or HPTX at a Level 1 Trauma Center from January 2016 to December 2021. Comparison was made between SB and LB thoracostomy tubes. The primary outcome was indication for chest tube placement based on injury pattern. Secondary outcomes included retained hemothorax, insertion-related complications, and duration of chest tube placement. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Three hundred and forty-one patients were included and 297 (87.1%) received LB tubes. No significant differences were found between the groups concerning tube failure and insertion-related complications. LB tubes were more frequently placed in patients with penetrating MOI, higher average ISS, and higher average thoracic AIS. Patients who received LB chest tubes experienced a higher incidence of retained HTX. In patients with thoracic trauma, both SB and LB chest tubes may be used for treatment. SB tubes are typically placed in nonemergent situations, and there is apparent provider bias for LB tubes. A future randomized clinical trial is needed to provide additional data on the usage of SB tubes in emergent situations.

The Effect of the Ultrasonography Measurement Method and the Conventional Measurement Method Used in Endotracheal Tube Size Selection in the Pediatric Patient Group on Postextubation Complications and Patient Recovery.

In this study, we aimed to compare the cuffed intubation tube selected with the Cole formula and tracheal ultrasonography (USG) measurement method regarding postextubation complications in providing airway patency and determine its effects on patient recovery. Between 01 July 2022 and 30 June 2023, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk group I-III, 4-6-year-old patients who underwent pediatric orthodontic surgery (multiple tooth extraction) were included in the study. Data of age, gender, weight, ASA risk group, history, Cole formula, USG measurement results used in the endotracheal tube (ETT) selection (one of the two whichever application was used), fasting time, intubation success, operation time, 30th-minute modified Aldrete recovery score (MASS), and postoperative complications due to intubation (within the first postoperative hour) were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method used by the anesthesiologists in selecting the ETT at the beginning of the operation. The group that used Cole formula management was named I, while the group that used the USG measurement method was called II. Intubation-related complication data of the patients in the first 1 hour postoperatively and MASS values at the 30th minute were compared between the groups. In this study, 52.5% of the cases were male (n=42), 47.5% were female (n=38), the mean age was 4.84±0.84 years, and the mean body weight was 22.56±7.58 kilogram. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, body weight, ASA score, operation time, and period without oral consumption. ETT diameter measurement values according to groups were 4.73±0.46 mm in Group I and 4.41±0.61 mm in Group II. Postoperative 30th-minute MASS values were median 7 in Group I and median 8 in Group II (p<.001). MASS values were significantly higher in the Group II patient group. Intubation-related complications (postoperative cough, stridor, laryngospasm, tachypnea, wheezing, dysphonia) were observed in Group I with a rate of 40% within the first postoperative hour, while complications were marked with a rate of 17.5% in Group II (p=0.026). Complications in group II were significantly lower. In the pediatric age group, especially under the age of 6, trachea measurement with USG and ETT selection is an effective, safe, and noninvasive method compared to other conventional methods. ETT size selection with USG accelerates postoperative patient recovery and reduces the risk of intubation-related complications. In addition, inflating the tube cuff under USG guidance can prevent cuff-related complications.

Ten-Year Review of Tracheostomy Techniques and Related Complications.

Tracheostomy is a frequently performed procedure that allows for definitive airway access in critically ill patients. Complications associated with tracheostomy have been well documented in the literature. This study aims to examine if different tracheostomy techniques were associated with specific complications. Secondary objectives were to determine the rate and commonality of post-tracheostomy complications. This was a descriptive retrospective study of patients who underwent tracheostomy between June 2009 and June 2019. Patients included in the study were ≥18years and were admitted to a rural tertiary care hospital system. Overall procedure complication rate was 34.3% with pneumonia (18.6%), obstruction (6.2%), bleeding (4.0%), and accidental tube decannulation (3.8%) being the most common. Rate of complications was not associated with the timing of the tracheostomy, the incision type, tube location, tracheostomy technique, and securing technique. However, tube size significantly differed between patients with or without complications (P = .016). Tube size 8 Shiley was most commonly used in both groups and was significantly associated with reduced complication rate (72.0% vs 78.8%, P = .002). Tracheostomy technique should be guided by proceduralist experience and patient clinical picture to determine the best approach. However, the association of post-tracheostomy complication with tube size perhaps will guide clinicians with tube size selection.

Association of Educational Intervention With Knowledge of Airway Injury After Endotracheal Intubation and Tube Size Selection

In this nonrandomized controlled trial, an educational intervention for emergency medicine residents was developed to increase knowledge of airway injury following prolonged intubation and reduce the proportion of large-for-height endotracheal tubes placed in the emergency department.

Endotracheal Tube Size Is Associated With Mortality in Patients With Status Asthmaticus.

There is limited evidence on the clinical importance of the endotracheal tube (ETT) size selection in patients with status asthmaticus who require invasive mechanical ventilation. We set out to explore the clinical outcomes of different ETT internal diameter sizes in subjects mechanically ventilated with status asthmaticus. This was a retrospective study of intubated and non-intubated adults admitted for status asthmaticus between 2014-2021. We examined in-hospital mortality across subgroups with different ETT sizes, as well as non-intubated subjects, using logistic and generalized linear mixed-effects models. We adjusted for demographics, Charlson comorbidities, the first Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, intubating personnel and setting, COVID-19, and the first PaCO2 . Finally, we calculated the post-estimation predictions of mortality. We enrolled subjects from 964 status asthmaticus admissions. The average age was 46.9 (SD 14.5) y; 63.5% of the encounters were women and 80.6% were Black. Approximately 72% of subjects (690) were not intubated. Twenty-eight percent (275) required endotracheal intubation, of which 3.3% (32) had a 7.0 mm or smaller ETT (ETT ≤ 7 group), 16.5% (159) a 7.5 mm ETT (ETT ≤ 7.5 group), and 8.6% (83) an 8.0 mm or larger ETT (ETT ≥ 8 group). The adjusted mortality was 26.7% (95% CI 13.2-40.2) for the ETT ≤ 7 group versus 14.3% ([(95% CI 6.9-21.7%], P = .04) for ETT ≤ 7.5 group and 11.0% ([95% CI 4.4-17.5], P = .02) for ETT ≥ 8 group, respectively. Intubated subjects with status asthmaticus had higher mortality than non-intubated subjects. Intubated subjects had incrementally higher observed mortality with smaller ETT sizes. Physiologic mechanisms can support this dose-response relationship.

New formula for selection of an appropriate left-sided double-lumen tube size in thoracic anaesthesiology

BackgroundIn thoracic anaesthesiology, double-lumen endobronchial tubes are used to provide one-lung ventilation. However, selecting the appropriate double-lumen endobronchial tube size to provide the most suitable ventilation with minimal damage is a challenging task for anaesthesiologists. There is no standardised approach to this issue. The present study aimed to develop a standardised mathematical formula for determining the appropriate size of the left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube in thoracic anaesthesiology. MethodsThis retrospective study included 192 patients who were intubated with a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube for one-lung ventilation in our centre and underwent thoracic surgery between 2015 and 2020. Generalised multiple linear regression models were constructed, and five indicators were used as factorial features: sex, height, weight, diameter of the left main bronchus, and age. ResultsA stepwise method with an entrance threshold of P<0.1 and removal threshold of P>0.2 was used to select factors significantly related to tube size. This method identified the following three factors: sex, height, and the diameter of the left main bronchus (DLMB). The size of the tube increased (p<0.001) by 0.121 per cm of patient height (p<0.001) and by 7.22 per cm of DLMB. In addition, the increase was greater in men than in women (by 1.27; p<0.001). When the size of the tube corresponded to that calculated by formula, pulmonary complications were observed in 10.0% of patients. In contrast, when the size did not match, complications were noted in 31.2% of patients. ConclusionsWe developed a standardised mathematical formula for determining the appropriate size of a left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tube. Further prospective studies are required to confirm the accuracy of the formula for use in thoracic anaesthesiology.

State of the art: percutaneous tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Percutaneous tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and offers many benefits, including decreasing ICU length of stay and need for sedation while improving patient comfort, effective communication, and airway clearance. However, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of tracheostomy in ICU patients. Ultrasound (US) and bronchoscopy are useful adjunct tools to optimize procedural performance. US can be used pre-procedurally to identify vascular structures and to select the optimal puncture site, intra-procedurally to assist with accurate placement of the introducer needle, and post-procedurally to evaluate for a pneumothorax. Bronchoscopy provides real-time visual guidance from within the tracheal lumen and can reduce complications, such as paratracheal puncture and injury to the posterior tracheal wall. A step-by-step detailed procedural guide, including preparation and procedural technique, is provided with a team-based approach. Technical aspects, such as recommended equipment and selection of appropriate tracheostomy tube type and size, are discussed. Certain procedural considerations to minimize the risk of complications should be given in circumstances of patient obesity, coagulopathy, or neurologic illness. Herein, we provide a practical state of the art review of percutaneous tracheostomy in ICU patients. Specifically, we will address pre-procedural preparation, procedural technique, and post-tracheostomy management.

Current Practices in Endotracheal Tube Size Selection for Adults.

Intubation with inappropriately sized endotracheal tubes (ETT) can cause long-term tracheal and laryngeal injuries often requiring surgical intervention. Although tracheal size has been demonstrated to vary based on height and sex, it is unclear whether these guidelines are regularly implemented in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation. The objective of this study is to determine the rate of appropriate ETT size selection in patients undergoing intubation and assess provider decision making in ETT size selection. Retrospective cohort study. The study population was all patients who underwent endotracheal intubation over a two-week period at a tertiary academic medical center. Data were collected on patient age, gender, height, BMI, comorbidities, ETT size, duration of intubation, bronchoscopies, and type of practitioner who performed the intubation. A height-based nomogram for ETT size selection was used to determine the recommended ETT size for each patient. One hundred five patients met the inclusion criteria. 22% of patients were intubated with an inappropriately large tube, defined as 1.0 mm larger than the recommended size. Women were more likely to be intubated with an inappropriately large ETT (OR=13.58, P=.001), as were patients with height less than 160 cm (OR=141, P=.001). Other factors related to disease severity, anticipation for bronchoscopy, and BMI were not risk factors for the use of inappropriately large ETT. Although there is compelling evidence that height is a strong predictor of tracheal morphology and appropriate ETT size, height-based guidelines have yet to be universally adopted for ETT size selection. Laryngoscope, 131:1967-1971, 2021.

Prediction of appropriate formula for nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children.

Developmental disability children have differences in growth. Therefore, tube size selection is important for nasotracheal intubation. In our previous study for healthy children undergoing dental surgery, height was the most suitable factor to predict nasotracheal tube size. The aim of this study was to find the most suitable formula for selection of nasotracheal tube size for them, retrospectively. Developmental disability children aged 2 to 10 years were included in this study. They were intubated nasotracheally from April 2012 until May 2017. Their actually intubated tube sizes were checked. The predicted tube sizes were calculated according to the formulas by the backgrounds: the diameter of the trachea at the 6th cervical (C6), 7th cervical (C7), and 2nd thoracic vertebrae (T2) in X-ray. The actually intubated tube sizes were compared with predicted sizes. Data were analyzed using Spearman's regression analysis. The tube sizes with 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0 mm ID were intubated in 75 patients. The age-based formula was the most suitable; the correlation coefficients (r2) were 0.9027 (vs age), 0.5434 (vs height), 0.3779 (vs weight), 0.0785 (vs C6), 0.2279 (vs C7), and 0.3065 (Th2) (p < 0.01). However, 0.5-mm smaller size tubes were more frequently intubated actually. Their correspondence rate to the predicted size was 48% (5.0 mm), 52% (5.5 mm), and 39% (6.0 mm), respectively. The age-based formula could be the most suitable for predicting nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children aged 2 to 10 years. One smaller size by the age formula was most suitable at first trial tube. The present data indicate that the selection of nasotracheal tube using one smaller size by the age formula (ID = 4 + age [years]/4) might be useful for developmental disability children.

Measurement of subglottic diameter and distance to pre-epiglottic space among Chinese adults.

Proper endotracheal tube (ETT) size selection and identification of potentially difficult airways are important to reduce laryngeal injury during intubation. However, controversies exist concerning transverse subglottic diameter-the narrowest part of the airway-and the distance to pre-epiglottic space. Because few studies have reported the distance from skin to the midpoint of the epiglottis (DSE) among normal individuals, whether the DSE varies between individuals and by ethnicity remains uncertain. The present study aims to investigate the sonographic subglottic diameter and DSE among healthy Chinese adults. Healthy volunteers were recruited at National Taiwan University Hospital between October and November 2019. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing airway or respiratory diseases, neck tumors, and a history of neck operation. Age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), sonographic DSE, and transverse subglottic diameter were recorded. A total of 124 participants were enrolled. The average age was 32.5 ± 10.4 years and 63 participants (51%) were males. The subglottic diameter was positively associated with sex (males, 14.40 mm; females, 11.10 mm, p < 0.001) and BMI (underweight, 12.13 mm; normal weight, 12.47 mm; overweight, 13.80 mm; obese, 13.67 mm, p = 0.007). Moreover, the DSE was shorter in males (male, 16.18 mm; females, 14.54 mm, p < 0.001) and participants with increased BMI (underweight, 13.70 mm; normal weight, 15.06 mm; overweight, 16.58 mm; obese, 18.18 mm, p < 0.001). As compared with other ethnicity, a smaller size of subglottic diameter and a shorter DSE were noted among Chinese participants, and we suggest that a relatively smaller size of endotracheal tube selection should be considered in tracheal intubations.

Point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesia: perioperative considerations.

To review the perioperative applications of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The role of point-of-care ultrasonography for perioperative care is expanding with respect to perioperative application. The imaging approach can complement the physical exam and provide additional information for decision-making in pediatric perioperative medicine. This review will focus on applications in the following organ systems: airway, cardiac, pulmonary and gastric. Specifically, POCUS of the airway has been used to optimize endotracheal tube depth, aid in tube size selection and predict difficulty with laryngoscopy and intubation. Lung POCUS has been used to assess for causes hypoxemia as well as to optimize ventilatory mechanics. Cardiac POCUS has been used for assessment of hemodynamics, valvular and ventricular function. Gastric ultrasound has emerged as an evaluative mechanism of gastric content in the setting of fasting as well as to confirm placement of gastric tubes. The applications of POCUS in the perioperative setting continue to evolve as a reliable diagnostic tool that can assist in timely diagnosis, improve procedural safety and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The utility of perioperative POCUS has been well demonstrated, specifically for examination of the airway, stomach and cardiopulmonary system. It is advisable for the novice sonographer to perform POCUS within the guidelines set by the American Society of Echocardiography regarding basic POCUS. As with all diagnostic modalities, understanding the limitations of ultrasound and POCUS as well as continuous self-assessment is crucial.

Accuracy of Broselow tape in estimating the weight of the child for management of pediatric emergencies in Nepalese population

BackgroundChildren with emergency conditions require immediate life-saving intervention and resuscitation. Unlike adults, the pediatric emergency drug dose, equipment sizes, and defibrillation energy doses are calculated based on the weight of the individual child. Broselow tape is a color-coded length-based tape that utilizes height/weight correlations for children. However, in low-income countries like Nepal, due to factors like undernutrition, the Broselow tape may not accurately estimate weight in all ranges of pediatric age group.MethodsThis study was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics of Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital, in children less than 15 years of age. Our study aims to prospectively compare the actual weights of urban and rural Nepalese children with the estimated weights using the Broselow tape (2017 edition) and the updated APLS formula. The errors in the selection of endotracheal tube size and adrenaline dose using the Broselow tape were also explored.ResultsThis study included 315 children with male to female ratio of 0.63:1. They were divided into 3 groups according to their estimated weight by the Broselow tape into < 10 kg, 10–18, and > 18 kg. There was a total agreement of the estimated color zone according to the Broselow tape with the actual weight in the gray zone (p = 0.01). There was a positive relationship between the actual body weight and the estimated body weight (correlation (r = 0.970, p = 0.01) and accuracy (r2 = 0.941)). Our analysis showed that the accuracy of estimated weight with the Broselow tape decreases with increasing weight of children. The precision of the tape was relatively high in the lower length zones as compared to the higher length zones. The estimated size of the endotracheal tube (p = 0.01) and adrenaline dose (p = 0.08) by the Broselow tape was in agreement with that estimated using PALS formula in weight group of less than 18 kg, but decreases as the estimated weight increases further.ConclusionsThe accuracy of the Broselow tape in estimating the weight of a child, endotracheal tube size, and dose of adrenaline is higher in weight group of less than 18 kg, and accuracy decreases as the weight of child increases. The Broselow tape should be avoided in children weighing more than 18 kg. Hence, PALS age-based formula for ET tube size estimation and weight-based formula for adrenaline dose calculation are recommended for children weighing more than 18 kg.

Difficult extubation with silicone endotracheal tubes in three dogs

Three dogs were anaesthetised for various procedures. Endotracheal intubation was achieved with cuffed silicone tubes. No difficulty was reported during the intubation in two out of the three cases, whereas...

Dimensional Variations of Left-Sided Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes.

Background Tube size selection is critical in ventilating patients' lungs using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Little information about relevant parameters is readily available from manufacturers. The aim of this study is to provide reference data for relevant dimensions of conventionally available DLTs. Methods In this study in a benchmark in vitro setup, several dimensional parameters of four sizes of left-sided double-lumen endobronchial tubes from six different manufacturers were assessed, such as distances and diameters of tube shaft, cuff lengths, and diameters as well the angle at the tip. Results Endobronchial tubes of ostensibly the same size revealed wide variation in measured parameters between brands from different manufacturers. In some parameters, there was an overlap between different sizes from the same manufacturer, i.e., diameters and distances did not increase with increasing nominal endobronchial tube size. The information about dimensions of endobronchial tubes provided by manufacturers' leaflets is insufficient. Conclusions Endobronchial tube size selection carries unnecessary uncertainty because clinically relevant parameters are unknown and vary considerably between different manufacturers.

Development of a clinical tool to aid endotracheal tube size selection in dogs

ObjectiveTo identify phenotypic parameters correlating with the inner tracheal diameter (ITD) and endotracheal tube size (ETS) in adult dogs and to develop a chart for ETS estimation.MethodsFive-hundred and forty-four adult...

Focused airway ultrasound: an armamentarium in future airway management

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has gained the upper hand for being simple, non-invasive and portable. Traditional beliefs that ultrasound is futile in the imaging of air-filled structures has been refuted. Upper airway ultrasound is applicable to patients with distorted anatomy, not easily discernable by traditional methods, besides serving as a useful adjunct peri-intubation; as a pre-intubation screening tool for difficult laryngoscopy, selection of endotracheal tube (ETT) size and confirmation of ETT placement and depth, and to detect laryngeal mask airway (LMA) malrotation. Airway ultrasound also assists in procedural guidance for percutaneous cricothyroidotomy, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and airway nerve blocks by improving success rate with fewer attempts and safety. In the critical care unit, sonographic parameters of the airway provide means to predict post extubation stridor hence successful extubation, in addition to identifying upper airway pathologies. The feasibility of focused airway ultrasound also lies in its shallow learning curve and the relative ease of mastering the skill with appropriate training. The integration of upper airway ultrasound into POCUS examination may be a prelude to a bigger picture in future airway management. Increasing awareness of the practicality of this tool, availability in critical areas and improving technological advancements will encourage more usage resulting in its incorporation into routine clinical practice.

Predicting the appropriate size of the uncuffed nasotracheal tube for pediatric patients: a retrospective study.

The selection of an appropriate size of tracheal tube is important for airway management. For nasotracheal intubation, passing the nasal cavity should be taken into account for the selection of tube size. The aim of this study was to investigate the selection of appropriate size of nasotracheal tube in pediatric patients retrospectively. The 1-12-year patients underwent dental procedures under general anesthesia intubated nasotracheally. The correlation between height, age, weight, the tracheal diameters at C6, C7, Th2 on the chest X-ray, and actually performed tube sizes were calculated. In addition, we compared the relationships between the predicted tube size and actually the intubated tube size. The tube sizes intubated actually were between 4.0 and 6.0-mm ID. The formula by height could be most suitable for tube size. The correspondence rates for the tube with 4.5- and 5.0-mm ID were 78% and 53%. When they were predicted as 5.5- or 6.0-mm ID, 0.5mm smaller size tube were intubated actually; 56% and 70%. When the predicted tube size was 4.0-mm ID, 0.5mm larger size tube was intubated actually; 66%. The formula by height could be most suitable for the selection of size for pediatric nasotracheal intubation. When the predicted tube size was 5.5 or 6.0-mm ID, 0.5mm smaller size should be chosen at first. In the case of 4.0-mm ID, 0.5mm larger size should be chosen for first trial. The present data indicate that the selection of nasotracheal tube using the formula by height might be useful.

Appropriate endotracheal tube size selection using thoracic radiography in dogs: a clinical trial

Appropriate endotracheal tube size selection using thoracic radiography in dogs: a clinical trial

OP03-5 - A retrospective analysis of double-lumen tube size and hypoxaemia during lung resection

There continues to be significant variation in double-lumen tube (DLT) size selection among anaesthesiologists for thoracic surgery. Advocates for placing the largest possible DLT argue that smaller DLTs have a greater risk of dislodgement and of bronchial mucosal injury. Advocates for smaller DLTs argue that they are easier to place and are not definitively associated with airway trauma. DLT size is commonly selected using patient height and sex, but can also be chosen by radiographic airway measurements. A previous pilot study with 300 patients at our institution found no difference in hypoxaemia, inadequate lung isolation, or need for DLT repositioning when using a smaller DLT. Given these findings, we sought to review whether DLT size was associated with hypoxaemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in a larger patient population.