Abstract Worsening climate change impacts are amplifying the need for accurate estimates of vegetation structure and aboveground biomass density (AGBD) to assess changes in biodiversity and carbon storage. In Australia, increasing wildfire frequency and interest in the role of forests in the carbon cycle necessitates biomass mapping across large geographic extents to monitor forest change. The availability of spaceborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) optimised for vegetation structure mapping through the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) provides an opportunity for large-scale forest AGBD estimates of higher accuracy. This study assessed the use of the GEDI canopy height product to predict woody AGBD across five vegetation types in Western Australia: tall eucalypt forests, eucalypt open‒woodlands, low-lying heathland, tropical eucalypt savannas, and tussock and hummock grasslands. Canopy height models were developed using random forest regressions trained on GEDI canopy height discrete point data. Predictor variables included spectral bands and vegetation indices derived from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) Sentinel‒1 data, and multispectral Landsat and Sentinel‒2 data. AGBD was subsequently estimated using power-law models derived by relating the predicted canopy heights to field AGBD plots. Mapping was conducted for 2020 and 2021. The accuracy of canopy height predictions varied with height quantiles; models underestimated the height of taller trees and overestimated the height of smaller trees. A similar underestimation and overestimation trend was observed for the AGBD estimates. The mean carbon stock was estimated at 69.0 ±12.0 MgCha-1 in the tall eucalypt forests of the Warren region; 33.8 ± 5.0 MgCha-1 for the open eucalypt woodlands in the South Jarrah region; 7.1 ± 1.4 MgCha-1 for the heathland and shrublands in the Geraldton Sandplains region; 43.9 ± 4.9 MgCha-1 for the Kimberley eucalypt savanna; and 3.9 ± 1.0 MgCha-1 for the Kimberley savanna grasslands. This approach provides a useful framework for the future development of this process for fire management, and habitat health monitoring.
Read full abstract