Tricuspid Position Research Articles

Prosthetic Valve Fate in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Prosthetic valve-related morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed patients who received a HeartMate II or 3 LVAD at our center between April 2004 and December 2022. Patients with a valve prosthesis in any position were included. Of the 726 LVAD recipients, 74 (10.2%) underwent valve replacement before (n = 37, 50.0%), concomitantly with (n = 32, 43.2%), or after (n = 6, 8.1%) LVAD insertion. Prosthetic valves were implanted in the aortic (n = 32), mitral (n = 23), and tricuspid (n = 26) positions. Mechanical valves were present in eight (three aortic, five mitral) patients. At a median follow-up of 1.97 years post-VAD (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.56-4.58 years), there was one valve-related death due to severe aortic bioprosthetic insufficiency. Five of 28 (17.9%) patients with an aortic bioprosthesis had evidence of dysfunction on follow-up echocardiography. Median time to first sign of aortic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was 1 (IQR: 0.6-5.1) year from time of LVAD with the prosthesis in place and 10.8 (IQR: 9.5-12.6) years from date of initial valve insertion. Prosthetic valve-related mortality or reinterventions are uncommon in patients with LVADs; however, bioprosthetic aortic valve dysfunction can develop less than 1 year after LVAD implantation.

The novel balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve: systematic review of aortic, mitral, tricuspid and pulmonary indications

Introduction and objectivesMyval technology represents the first balloon-expandable alternative since the Edwards system became commercially available. Despite certain controversies, its use has rapidly expanded. We aimed to gather all the available literature regarding its indications and outcomes. MethodsA comprehensive search of articles published between December 2016 and May 2024 was conducted using BioMedCentral, Google Scholar, and PubMed to evaluate the main outcomes of Myval for native aortic stenosis (AS) (meta-analysis) and off-label uses (systematic review). ResultsA total of 151 studies were identified, and 74 were included in the analysis, covering aortic (n=51), mitral (n=9), tricuspid (n=6), and pulmonary (n=8) valve positions. A meta-analysis of studies on native AS demonstrated that Myval is safe and effective, with a 30-day mortality rate of 1.3%, good hemodynamic performance, low rates of pacemaker implantation (8.8%), and ≥ moderate paravalvular regurgitation (1.3%). Compared with other contemporary devices, Myval was competitive and associated with lower rates of pacemaker implantation. In a systematic review of off-label indications, Myval was also found to be safe and effective. In bicuspid AS, pure regurgitation, and aortic valve-in-valve procedures, success rates were 100%, 92%, and 100%, respectively, with pacemaker rates of 9.9%, 22.2%, and 3%, respectively. For mitral valve-in-valve/in-ring procedures, the success rate was 96.9%, while in tricuspid and pulmonary positions, small case series reported 100% success rates for both, with minimal procedural complications. ConclusionsMyval technology is safe and effective for the treatment of native valvular disease and dysfunctional prostheses or rings in all heart valve positions, although larger scale studies are warranted.

Feasibility of intentional bioprosthetic valve fracture in the tricuspid position.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (ViV) replacement has yielded good hemodynamic outcomes in the treatment of dysfunctional bioprosthetic valves (BPVs). Intentional fracture of certain rigid BPV frames, if feasible, allows a larger implanted valve when compared with implant into an unfractured BPV. There remains limited data on the feasibility of tricuspid valve frame fracture. Evaluate the feasibility of transcatheter tricuspid ViV replatement with fracture of the underlying BPV ring. An international multicenter registry of tricuspid ViV replacement with intentional tricuspid valve frame fracture was created. Demographic data along with procedural characteristics, outcomes, and follow-up data were collected. Comparison was made to the pre- and post-ViV replacement with fracture of the tricuspid valve frame conditions. Ten patients from six centers were included with a median age and weight of 29 years and 67.3 kg respectively. Tricuspid valve frame fracture was performed using a median balloon diameter 3 mm (IQR 3-5) larger than the true inner diameter (ID). The final ID was a mean of 1.5 mm (95% CI: 0.35, 2.64: p < 0.05), and median 1.1 mm (0.5, 2.1) larger than the reported true ID of the surgical BPV after ViV replacement. The mean tricuspid inflow gradient by echocardiogram decreased by 6.65 mmHg (95% CI: 4.14, 9.15: p < 0.001). All procedures were without complication, specifically there was no heart block, pericardial effusion, or right coronary disruption. Intentional tricuspid valve frame fracture with tricuspid ViV replacement is feasible and can increase the valve orifice potentially reducing the risk of ViV patient prosthesis mismatch and is not associated with significant complications.

Obstructions of prosthetic heart valves: diagnosis and treatment considerations

Objectives: Since the first years of native heart valve replacement by - prosthetic valves; prosthesis thrombogenicity has kept its importance as a serious problem causing post-operative morbidities and mortality. This study aims to evaluate early postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients diagnosed with prosthetic valve thrombosis and treated surgically or non-surgically. Methods: Thirty-one patients diagnosed with and treated for prosthetic valve thrombosis were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were followed up for 58 months. Results: There were 24 females and 7 males. The mean patient age at the time of prosthetic valve thrombosis diagnosis was 40.7±11 (range, 10-57) years. The mean duration between prosthetic valve replacement and the first signs of prosthetic valve thrombosis was 67.67±66 (range, 1 to 300) months. All patients presented with a functional capacity of NYHA Class III or IV. A total of 32 interventions; 27 surgical and 5 thrombolytic treatments due to elevated aortic prosthetic valve pressure gradient which did not improve with thrombolysis. Of 27 surgical interventions for thrombosed prosthetic valves, 21 involved mitral, 2 aortic, and 4 tricuspid positions. A total of 9 patients died during follow-up. The overall mortality rate was 29.03%. The mortality rate was 29.62% after surgical interventions and 20% after thrombolytic treatment. Conclusion: Currently prosthetic valve replacement is the basic palliation method in the management of patients with diseased native heart valves. In the majority of mechanical prosthetic valve obstructions, the main pathology is fibrous tissue proliferation-related to irregular warfarin usage, which in turn causes the development of acute symptoms secondary to acute valve thrombosis. The necessary treatment method for prosthetic valve obstructions should be either the use of thrombolytic agents or the replacement of the obstructed prosthetic valve with a new one.

Percutaneous valve-in-valve valve implantation in tricuspid position. First case report of a pediatric patient in Colombia

Percutaneous valve-in-valve valve implantation in tricuspid position. First case report of a pediatric patient in Colombia

Comparative study of the hemodynamic characteristics of artificial mechanical heart valves with one and three leaflets in the tricuspid position

Comparative study of the hemodynamic characteristics of artificial mechanical heart valves with one and three leaflets in the tricuspid position

Restricted cusp motion in newly implanted tricuspid bioprostheses: Incidence, predictors, and impact on survival

ObjectiveTo investigate the occurrence of restricted cusp motion (RCM) at the time of bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) and analyze associated risk factors and outcomes. MethodsThis study involved adult patients who underwent TVR with a bioprosthesis at our institution between 2012 and 2022. Bioprosthetic cusp motion was analyzed de novo through a detailed review of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms (TEE). Two models of porcine valves were implanted: the Medtronic Hancock II bioprosthesis and the St Jude Medical Epic bioprosthesis. ResultsAmong the 476 patients who met the inclusion criteria, RCM was identified on immediate post-bypass TEE in 150 (31.5%); there was complete immobility of the cusp in 63 patients (13.2%) and limited movement of a cusp in 87 patients (18.3%). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the Hancock II model (odds ratio [OR], 6.15; P < .001), a larger orifice area (per IQR increase: OR, 1.58; P = .017), a smaller body surface area (per IQR increase: OR, .68; P = .040), and a lower ejection fraction (per IQR increase: OR, .60; P = .033) were independently associated with having RCM. Cox regression adjusting for 15 covariates revealed that RCM at the time of TVR was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.35; P = .049). ConclusionsThis study revealed a high incidence of RCM in bioprosthetic valves in the tricuspid position detected shortly postimplantation, which was associated with increased late mortality. To reduce the probability of RCM, it is important to select the appropriate prosthesis model and size, particularly in small patients.

Choice of valve substitutes.

Infective endocarditis often necessitates surgical intervention, and the choice of valve substitute remains a topic of controversy and highly debatable due to the wide range of available options and recent technical advancements. This manuscript reviews the different valve substitutes in the context of infective endocarditis, including mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, homografts, xenografts, and tissue-engineered valves. The patient's age, sex, demographic location, intellectual quotient, comorbidities, available options, and the experience of the surgeon should all be taken into consideration while choosing the best valve substitute for that individual. While valve repair and reconstruction are preferred whenever feasible, valve replacement may be the only option in certain cases. The choice between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves should be guided by standard criteria such as age, sex, expected lifespan, associated comorbidities, and anticipated adherence to anticoagulation therapy and accessibility of medical facilities for follow-up. For patients with severe chronic illness or a history of intracranial bleeding or associated hematological disorders, the use of mechanical prostheses may be avoided. Homografts and bioprosthetic valves provide an alternative to mechanical valves, thereby decreasing the necessity for lifelong anticoagulation after surgery and diminishing the likelihood of bleeding complications. The manuscript also discusses specific valve substitutes for different heart valves (aortic, mitral, pulmonary, tricuspid positions) and highlights emerging techniques such as the aortic valve neocuspidization (Ozaki procedure) and tissue-engineered valves. Ultimately, the ideal valve substitute in IE should be evidence based on a comprehensive elucidation of clinical condition of the patient and available options.

Failed bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement treated with transcatheter valve for valve repair

Tricuspid bioprosthetic valve failure may lead to right-sided heart failure and is traditionally managed with surgical valve replacement. However, the substantial mortality risk associated with reoperation for failed tricuspid bioprosthesis prompts the need for less invasive alternatives. Transcatheter valve-in-valve (TViV) implantation presents a promising minimally invasive option for patients with failing bioprosthetic valves. This case involves a 32-year-old man with a history of recurrent failed bioprosthetic tricuspid valves who underwent successful percutaneous TViV implantation using a 29 mm Edwards Sapien S3 valve, resulting in marked clinical and hemodynamic improvement. This case contributes essential insights to the limited literature on TViV in the tricuspid position, particularly in patients with complex surgical histories. The high procedural success rate and substantial improvement in valve function underscore the potential of TViV as an effective alternative to surgical replacement for failed tricuspid bioprosthetic valves. Keywords: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement; tricuspid valve-in-valve; bioprosthetic tricuspid valve; tricuspid valve stenosis

Thrombosis of Prosthetic Tricuspid Valve During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Case Report

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently used for severe postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in patients with bioprosthetic valves. Acute prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare complication after valve replacement surgery and significantly increases morbidity and mortality. Patients who develop PVT on ECMO could significantly influence the long-term durability of the bioprosthetic valves. However, previous studies only analyzed risk factor and treatment of the mitral valve thrombosis during ECMO support. The mechanism of thrombosis on the tricuspid valve was still unknown. Here we describe the symptoms and treatment of a valve replacement patient who developed bioprosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Meanwhile, the patient’s mechanical prosthetic mitral valve functioned normally. An emergency re-do tricuspid prosthesis replacement was performed, and the patient finally developed the successful decannulation. At 6 months follow-up, the patient showed asymptomatic and had a reasonable quality of life. The pathophysiology of tricuspid valve thrombosis may be different from the left heart. Our case highlights that the risk of thrombosis associated with a prosthesis in the tricuspid position can be even higher in the setting of VA-ECMO support. In such patients, promoting forward blood flow across the prosthesis and improving levels of anticoagulation may be particularly important.

Remote magnetic navigation catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia in a patient with d-transposition of the great arteries, atrial switch, and a mechanical valve in the tricuspid position.

Remote magnetic navigation catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia in a patient with d-transposition of the great arteries, atrial switch, and a mechanical valve in the tricuspid position.

Mitral allografts in tricuspid valve position in modern surgery of acquired heart defects: a systematic review

Introduction: In severe recurrent infectious lesions in the right heart, one of the alternative options for bioprosthetics is to implant mitral allografts (donor heart valves) in the tricuspid valve position. Allografts offer numerous benefits, including a configuration that closely resembles a native valve, adaptability to high systemic pressure, absence of foreign elements that can could act as entry points for infections, and antibacterial treatment without lifelong anticoagulant therapy.Objective: To study the feasibility of using a mitral allograft in the tricuspid position based on the analysis of literature data and our own experience.Methods: Searches were conducted in Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, and Russian Science Citation Index databases using search queries, keywords, and logical operators. The last session was conducted on December 21, 2022. In the initial selection of aforementioned search queries, a total of 4,446 results were obtained (Google Scholar — 3,080, Medline — 1,050, Russian Science Citation Index — 316). After analyzing titles and abstracts, 4,390 studies were excluded due to the insufficient data. Of the remaining studies, 25 scientific papers were excluded due to their duplication. The final group included 31 studies.Results: Based on a systematic literature review, the article presents aspects of the explantation, preparation, and implantation of the mitral allograft in the tricuspid position at the present stage of biotechnology development. The article highlights the main complications, rare clinical observations, and immediate and long-term postoperative results of mitral allograft implantation in the tricuspid position.Conclusion: This technique presents an interesting solution for patients with severe structural changes in the tricuspid valve, but further research is necessary at this stage of biotechnology development. Received 9 March 2023. Revised 7 September 2023. Accepted 11 September 2023. Funding: The study did not have sponsorship. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Contribution of the authors: The authors contributed equally to this article.

Mitral homograft in tricuspid position: indications for implantation and surgical technique

HighlightsThe article presents the latest data on the techniques of implantation of the mitral homograft in the tricuspid position, and identifies groups of patients who are best suited for this method. Moreover, the article describes the evolution of this type of replacement, and highlights that many surgical techniques, although justified, require further study to show demonstrate their advantages. AbstractDespite the general trend in cardiac surgery towards valve-preserving interventions, valve replacements remain relevant, and the search for the perfect prosthetic valve continues. Many believe that tricuspid valve replacement using a mitral homograft can be the method of choice in certain situations. The analysis of the studies found in the PubMed database led the authors to the following conclusions: most of the data on the use of this technique in patients with infective endocarditis (IE), other indications are congenital heart disease (CHD) and rheumatic heart disease. Patients with IE who have undergone tricuspid valve replacement using a mitral homograft have good medium-term prospects, and respond well to medical treatment of recurrent IE. The mitral homograft in the tricuspid position remains intact even after prosthetic endocarditis. In this regard, it is possible to perform reconstructive intervention in case of prosthetic valve dysfunction without the need for repeated replacement. Such interventions are relevant for patients with growing heart for whom annuloplasty at the first stage of surgery is undesirable. Moreover, it is also cost-effective due to the high cost and low availability of homografts. The possibility of repeated tricuspid valve-in-valve replacement is important for patients who may not survive open surgery. To date, there are not enough long-term and short-term data on using a mitral homograft for tricuspid valve replacement, however, it can be assumed that the results of this technique will be positive provided that the appropriate implantation technique and strict patient selection are ensured. Many authors have come to the conclusion that the optimal homograft implantation technique includes sewing of the graft`s papillary muscles into the wall of the myocardium of the right ventricle (RV), fixating them on the outer surface of the RV, anatomical positioning of the homograft (anterior leaflet faces towards the IVS), and the use of an annuloplasty ring.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair after a heart transplant: a single-centre experience with a novel therapy†.

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients who had heart transplants is associated with poor outcome. The increased risk for surgical and postoperative complications might be reduced in these vulnerable patients by transcatheter therapies. All patients with a prior heart transplant (HTX) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in the tricuspid position (T-TEER) were prospectively enrolled in an institutional registry. Seven patients who had heart transplants (5/7 female) at a mean age of 53 [48; 64] and median TRI-SCORE of 14 [7; 22] underwent T-TEER to treat symptomatic TR ≥ IV in an elective (n = 6) and urgent (n = 1) setting, respectively. The median time from HTX to T-TEER was 13 years. A total of 2 (n = 4) and 3 (n = 3) clips were implanted with a technical success in 6/7 (one single- device detachment). TR reduction was effective and durable within a median echocardiographic follow-up time of 10 months (TR baseline vs last follow-up: P = 0.03). Further, significant right ventricular remodelling (right ventricular end-diastolic diameter: 50 mm-36 mm, P = 0.02), decrease in the inferior vena cava diameter (24 mm-18 mm, P = 0.04) and in the gamma-glutamyl-transferase (255 U/l-159 U/l, P = 0.04) was found. Four of 7 patients were free of cardiovascular death (n = 1, 267 days after T-TEER), cardiac redo surgery (n = 1) and heart failure hospitalization (n = 2) and had no further clinical signs of right heart failure. T-TEER after HTX is feasible and effective regarding TR reduction in a short-term follow-up. The initial results may pave the way for a novel approach in TR management in patients having HTX.

P48 PATIENT SELECTION FOR TRANSCATHETER TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY: CASE PRESENTATION

Abstract Clinical case We describe the case of an 87–year–old woman, BSA 1.7 m2, affected by arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, COPD, stage III chronic renal failure. The patient underwent aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis. The patient had good quality of life. n the last year, the patient had had two hospitalizations for right heart failure, with a home dose of Furosemide of 250 mg/day. A transthoracic echocardiogram, performed in outpatient setting, showed massive tricuspid regurgitation (ERO 0.8 cm2), TAPSE 21 mm, S TDI 0.12 cmc/sec, LVEF 55%, sPAP 40 mmHg (RHC). The TRISCORE (specific risk score for tricuspid pathology) was equal to 8%, therefore at a high preoperative risk. The case was collectively discussed in the Heart Team and we decided for transcatheter treatment of the isolated tricuspid pathology. A transesophageal echocardiogram confirmed the severity of the tricuspid regurgitation, characterized by multiple jets of which the prevalent central and posteroseptal. The coaptation gap was 10 mm, with partial retraction of the septal flap. Therefore, the possibility of an edge–to–edge treatment was excluded and the screening for annuloplasty device evaluation (Cardioband) continued. Cardio–CT showed feasibility for Cardioband with adequate implant safety and distance from the right coronary artery. Therefore, a Cardioband (Edwards Lifesciences) was implanted in the tricuspid position. The procedural time was 220 minutes. The final result was tricuspid regurgitation less than grade 2 (R vol 30 mL/beat, EROA 0.2). The patient was discharged on the 4th postoperative day. At the 30–day follow–up, he was in NYHA class I–II, with a furosemide dose of 75 mg/day, in the absence of peripheral edema. Conclusions Patients with isolated tricuspid regurgitation are, in most cases, not treated due to the high postoperative surgical risk. In recent years, transcatheter technologies have been a valid solution in the event of inoperability. Where a treatment on the valve leaflets is not feasible, tricuspid annuloplasty represents a valid alternative.

C48 TEN–YEARS, SINGLE–CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH MELODY TPV IMPLANTATION: EARLY OUTCOMES AND MID–TERM FOLLOW–UP

Abstract Objectives Melody TPV is the first percutaneous valvular bio–prosthesis approved for trans–catheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI). We describe our ten–years experience about Melody TPV implantation in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods This is an observational retrospective single–center study. All patients undergone Melody TPV implantation were included. The early outcomes analyzed were: procedural failure, death of patient, life–threating adverse events. The long–term outcomes analyzed during follow–up were: infective endocarditis, trans–catheter redo–procedure, and surgical redo–procedure. Results From 2012 to 2022, 39 patients were evaluated in our catheterization laboratory for TPVI with Melody TPV. Mean age and weight were 21,31±11,58 (range 8–66) years and 57,5±16,24 (range 23–96) kilograms. The patients were affected by the following CHD: tetralogy of Fallot (22 pts, 56,4%), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (VSD) (4 pts, 10,3%), aortic stenosis s/p Ross surgery (4 pts, 10,3%), transposition of the great arteries with VSD and PS (3 pts, 7,7%), pulmonary stenosis (PS) (2 pts, 5,1%), truncus arteriosus (2 pts, 5,1%), double outlet right ventricle (1 pt, 2,5%), Ebstein’s anomaly (1 pt, 2,5%) In 4 cases (10,3%), the procedure failed because of coronary compression during balloon RVOT interrogation. One patient (2,5%) died due to post–procedural septic shock. In the other 34 patients (87,2%), the Melody TPV was implanted effectively. No life–threating adverse events were recorded. In 3 cases, the Melody TPV was implanted off–label: in tricuspid position (one case) and in “small conduits” (&amp;lt;16 mm) (two cases). The mean follow–up was 4,41±2,82 years. During follow–up, 5 patients (14,7%) developed an infective endocarditis, 7 patients (20,6%) required a trans–catheter procedure (6 Melody balloon dilation and 1 Melody valve–in–valve), and 2 patients (5,9%) underwent surgical Melody TPV replacement. Conclusion Trans–catheter Melody TPV implantation is effective to deal RVOT dysfunction. At a mid–term follow–up, the most of the implanted Melody TPV worked properly and only a few patients required surgical valve replacement.

Is It Possible to Place a Pacemaker Lead Through a Bileaflet Mechanical Prosthesis?

We present a 64-year-old woman who underwent mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valve (TV) replacement with mechanical prostheses. Two months after TV surgery, she presented third-degree atrioventricular block. After attempting to place a pacemaker lead through the coronary sinus, it was placed through the mechanical valve in the tricuspid position as the last option. At 1 year of follow-up, the device shows no signs of dysfunction, and the prosthesis has moderate regurgitation.

Enoxaparin versus Unfractionated Heparin for the Perioperative Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery.

Background and Objectives: Immediate postoperative anticoagulation regimens in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves undergoing non-cardiac surgery are clear only for unfractionated heparin (UH), whereas the few low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) trials available to date concern the use of Enoxaparin in general/orthopedic surgery. We performed a single-center real-world data study comparing the efficacy and safety of LMWH—Enoxaparin (E)— and UH during the perioperative period in non-cardiac surgical procedures in patients with mechanical prosthetic valve replacement in the mitral, aortic, or tricuspid positions. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 380 patients, who received E or UH together with oral anticoagulation with antivitamin K (acenocoumarol) until they achieved an optimal International Normalized Ratio (INR). Objective assessment of E efficacy included the following: normal value for all the parameters of ultrasound prosthetic functioning, no early thrombosis of the prosthesis, and rapid achievement of target INR with a decreased period of subcutaneous anticoagulation. Subjective assessment included the following: clinical improvement with decreased immobilization and in-hospital stay, fewer gluteal ulcerations, and fewer postoperative depression and anxiety episodes. Results: Comparing with UH, anticoagulation with E was more effective (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.02). The probability of death was smaller in the E group compared with the UH group. No major hemorrhagic event was reported. Mild bleeding episodes and thrombocytopenia were more common in the UH group. Patient’s compliance and quality of life were better with E due to shortened hospitalization, decreased need for testing of coagulation (every 6 h for UH), better dosing (SC every 12 h for E versus continuous infusion for UH), shortened immobilization during the immediate postoperative period with subsequent improvement in the psychological status, as well as due to lack of significant side effects. Conclusions: Taking into consideration the improved efficiency and safety, as well as all the supplementary advantages, such as no need for anticoagulation monitoring, the ease of administration, and reduced duration of hospitalization, E should be seen as an attractive alternative for anticoagulation which deserves further investigation.

Physico-Mathematical Substantiation of the Effectiveness of a New Model of an Artificial Mechanical Single-Leaf Heart Valve in the Tricuspid Position

Physico-Mathematical Substantiation of the Effectiveness of a New Model of an Artificial Mechanical Single-Leaf Heart Valve in the Tricuspid Position

Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation with bioprosthetic balloon expandable valve.

This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of the transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves with transcatheter aortic valves. This retrospective study enrolled all consecutive patients who were considered high risk for reoperations by the heart team and who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves in Tehran Heart Center, Tehran, Iran. All the procedures were performed via the transfemoral venous route under echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance with Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Ten patients underwent successful transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the tricuspid position without any major complications or need for emergency surgical interventions. The mean age was 54.1 ± 17.1years, and 8 patients were female. The median follow-up was 19.5months (16-32.25 mon). The mean period between the last tricuspid valve replacement and transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation was 4.9 ± 2.2years. The bioprosthetic valves were Hancock in three patients, Mosaic in the other three patients, and Biocor, Pericarbon, Perimount, and Epic in the other patients. After the procedure, the clinical and functional status improved significantly in all the patients. The mean transvalvular gradient decreased from 6.75 ± 2.66mm Hg to 2.85 ± 0.89 (P < 0.001), and the postoperative tricuspid regurgitation severity decreased significantly in almost all the patients. The hospitalization period after the procedure was 4.4 ± 1.7days. In high-risk patients, transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation seems to be a safe and minimally invasive alternative to reoperations for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves.