Abstract Introduction Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. Several extra pulmonary vein (PV) ablation strategies for substrate modification (PVI plus) have been employed to AF patients. It has not been proven that this approach decreases the recurrence of AF, and it could contribute to increase the risk of developing atypical atrial flutter. Methods Patients submitted to AF catheter ablation at our centre between 2005 and 2020 were included. Using logistic regression, we did a retrospective analysis of the association between the application of PVI plus strategies (such as ablation of the cavo tricuspid isthmus (CTI), ganglion plexus, isolation of the superior vena cava (SVC), mitral isthmus ablation and atrial roof line ablation) and the development of atypical flutter later submitted to ablation. Results Five hundred and seventy-five patients were included (64% males, age 57±12 years [between 14 and 81], 68.2% with paroxysmal AF) with > 1-year follow-up. Five hundred and five (87.8%) had PVI alone. From the 575 patients, 11 (1.9%) developed an atypical flutter during the follow-up, which was later submitted to ablation. The crude ODDS of a patient submitted to a PVI plus strategy developing atypical atrial flutter are 13.92 times higher than the one of those submitted to a stand-alone PVI technique, with a p value <0.001 (95% CI 3.96 – 48.87). When adjusted for age and history of heart failure, the ODDS of a patient submitted to a PVI plus strategy developing atypical atrial flutter are 16.29 times higher than the one of those submitted to a stand-alone PVI technique, with a p value <0.001 (95% CI 3.92 – 67.65). Conclusions Additional substrate ablation for AF significantly increases the risk of developing atypical auricular flutter.Characteristics of the study populationCharacterization of PIV plus strategies