Trials Of High-dose Chemotherapy Research Articles

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with High-Dose Chemotherapy and Targeted Radiation: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase II Trial.

Simple SummaryBased on recent clinical trials, radiation is a standard treatment option for limited metastatic sites in metastatic breast cancer, with the potential to improve survival. This is typically given in the form of high-dose radiation called stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, SBRT is a newer technology that is not on option for all patients and does not have long-term follow-up. Prior to the widespread implementation of SBRT, we performed a clinical trial utilizing high-dose chemotherapy and standard radiation for metastases in patients with limited metastatic breast cancer. In this research, we analyzed the long-term outcomes of these patients. We found that, despite not using SBRT, radiation provided promising long-term disease control and survival. Therefore, conventional radiation might still be considered if SBRT in not an option for a patient, and our results also help suggest what long-term outcomes of SBRT treatment might look like.Background: Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (oMBC) may benefit from aggressive local therapy. We sought to assess the effects of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcomes in oMBC patients treated on a prospective phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). Methods: Between 2005 and 2009, 12 patients with oMBC (≤3 metastatic sites) cancer were treated on protocol. Patients were to receive tandem HDCT supported by hematopoietic cell rescue (HCR). All radiographically identifiable oligometastatic sites received targeted radiation. Results: HDCT was initiated at a median of 6.7 (3.5–12.7) months after diagnosis of oMBC. Hormone receptors (HR) were positive in 91.6% of patients, and HER2 was overexpressed in 25% of patients. Median radiation dose (EQD2) was 41.2 (37.9–48.7) Gy. Median follow-up was 13.1 (6.8–15.1) years for living patients. Ten-year PFS and OS were 33% (95%CI, 10–59%) and 55% (95%CI, 22–79%), respectively. Durable local control of treated lesions was 87.5%. At the last follow up, two patients remained progression free and two more were without evidence of disease following additional salvage treatment. Conclusions: Although modern systemic therapies have obviated the use of HDC, aggressive local therapy warrants further evaluation and fractionated radiotherapy is a viable alternative if SBRT is not available.

Combined Modality Therapy in the Upfront Treatment of Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review

Background: The role of combined modality therapy (CMT) in previously untreated patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the available evidence regarding the efficacy and long-term neurotoxicity of consolidative radiation therapy in addition to systemic chemotherapy in the upfront management of fit immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL.Methods: Peer reviewed literature searches were conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 1950 to March 26, 2015. We included all prospective clinical trials (randomized and non-randomized) published on or after January 1, 1998 with at least 20 subjects receiving frontline CMT with CNS-penetrating chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy. We excluded trials of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue and those involving patients with isolated intra-ocular lymphoma. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR) rate, partial remission (PR) rate, and incidence of late radiation-induced neurotoxicity. Two reviewers independently performed title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the quality of randomized trials included in this systematic review.Results: The literature search yielded 10,646 potentially relevant records for primary screening after de-duplication, of which 299 full-text articles were evaluated. Of the 299 full-text articles reviewed, there were 21 publications eligible for inclusion. These 21 publications represented 15 unique clinical trials (4 trials were reported in 2 publications each, and 1 trial was reported in 3 publications; Figure 1). The included studies involved a total of 1123 enrolled subjects. Of the 15 trials included, there was 1 phase III randomized controlled trial, 1 phase II randomized trial, and 2 non-randomized multi-arm trials. The remaining studies were single arm non-comparator trials. Chemotherapy backbones varied, and planned whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) doses ranged from 23.4 to 50.4 Gy. Due to variation in follow-up time, it was difficult to compare survival endpoints between studies. In the large multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial comparing 202 patients receiving WBRT to 208 patients without WBRT, there was no difference in OS (32.4 months vs. 36.1 months, p=0.98) however WBRT improved PFS from 9.9 months to 15.4 months (p=0.034) (Korfel et al., Neurology. 2015 Mar 24;84(12):1242-8). Response rates were not consistently reported after completion of both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Amongst those trials reporting response rates after completion of CMT, the CR rate ranged from 28-87% and the ORR ranged from 56-100%. Although there was variability in the definitions and reporting of delayed-onset neurotoxicity, this complication was common, ranging from 0-45.8%. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was only applicable to the 2 randomized trials in this review. On the basis of clinical heterogeneity, we chose not to statistically pool the results of the included trials together in this systematic review.Conclusions: We identified a large body of literature assessing the use of CMT in the upfront management of PCNSL. However, only one randomized study addressed the specific role of consolidative radiation therapy with respect to survival, in which there was no benefit to OS. Consolidative WBRT may improve local disease control and PFS, though late neurotoxicity remains a concern. Our review underscores the need for ongoing collaborative efforts between treatment centers to design and conduct large randomized controlled trials. [Display omitted] DisclosuresBuckstein:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Phase I Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy Combining Topotecan plus Cyclophosphamide with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Ovarian Cancer: The ITOV 01bis Study

Background: Dose-intensive chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been evaluated as a salvage treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer, but its benefit has not yet been demonstrated. In a previous phase I trial, we reported the feasibility of administering topotecan as a salvage regimen. Methods: Twenty-one patients were treated with escalating doses of topotecan associated with a fixed dose of cyclophosphamide. Results: The maximum tolerated dose was established at 9.0 mg/m² on a 5-day regimen, analogously to what was reported for topotecan monotherapy. One toxic death from septic shock and multiorgan failure occurred. Although hematopoietic toxicities were overcome by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, superior nonhematological toxicities were observed as compared to the initial trial. Conclusion: Response rates were generally short and survival rates were poor. Results of the ITOV 01bis study demonstrate that, in the setting of recurrent ovarian cancer, intensive chemotherapy based on topotecan-cyclophosphamide association is not currently clinically indicated.

Traitements systémiques des cancers du sein inflammatoires : un état des lieux

The poor prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is due to its strong metastatic potential. During the last three decades, the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), and its improvement with successive additions of anthracyclines and then taxanes, allowed to double the survival. However, the 5-year survival still remains lower than 50%, with the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant CT being a major prognostic factor. Since 1995, several innovative approaches have been evaluated. Initially, the trials of high-dose CT with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have generated promising results, but ultimately failed to change standards of treatment, in particular because of its toxicity. More recently, a few targeted therapies, combined to conventional CT, have been assessed, due to the frequent overexpression of HER2 and EGFR and the important vascularization of IBC. Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, has shown a clear advantage in terms of pCR and survival in studies dedicated to, HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancers, including IBC. Lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor anti-HER2 and EGFR, has shown significant activity in two phase II studies dedicated to HER2-positive IBC. The interest of HER2-double blockade by the combination of trastuzumab-pertuzumab combined to docetaxel has been demonstrated in term of pCR in the NEOSPHERE study which also included HER2-positive IBC. Among the anti-angiogenic drugs tested in studies dedicated to IBC, bevacizumab has given the most interesting results in term of efficacy/toxicity ratio. In the Beverly 2 study HER2-positive IBC patients were treated by the combination chemotherapy, trastuzumab and bevacizumab: the rate of pCR was 64%, and the 3-year disease-free and overall survivals were 68% and 90%, respectively; the increase of endothelial cells circulating was inversely correlated to the probability of pCR. All those treatments have been extrapolated from standard breast cancers. Thus, a deep molecular knowledge of IBC appears to be critical in order to develop specific treatments effectively targeting its particular aggressiveness.

789O - The TAXIF II Protocol Final Results: A Phase II Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy Supported by Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Disseminated Germ-Cell Tumors Failing Chemotherapy and with Adverse Prognostic Factors

ABSTRACT Background High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has been shown to circumvent resistance in poor-prognosis germ cell tumors (GCT), mainly for patients whose relapses occur more than 4 weeks after cisplatin-based CT. Patients and methods This multicentric phase II trial was addressed to patients with poor-prognosis non-refractory GCTs. The main objectives were to determine the complete response rate and to monitor treatment-associated toxicities. Patients with adverse prognostic factors failing CT were to receive 2 cycles combining Epirubicin and Paclitaxel (EpiTax), followed by 3 consecutive HDCT [one using a Paclitaxel/Thiotepa association, 2 using the 5-day Ifosfamide-Carboplatine-Etoposide regimen]. Inclusion criteria included seminomatous GCT in relapse after 2 lines of CT, non-seminomatous GCT in relapse after 1 or 2 lines, partial remission after 1 line, primary mediastinal GCT in first relapse. Peripheral blood stem cells were collected after the EpiTax cycles. Results Between 09/2004 and 12/2007, 45 patients were included: 45 received 1 HDCT, 39 two HDCT, 29 patients received the complete protocol. Sixteen patients did not received the entire protocol, 8 (53%) for toxic side effects. Two patients (4.4%) died of toxicities, 17 (37.7%) of disease progression. For a median follow-up time of 26 months (4–51 m), the final overall response rate was 66,7% (CR, 20,6%). The median PFS was 16 months (95%CI, 9-NA) and the median OS was 32 months (95%CI, 32–49). The 2-year PFS was a plateau set up at 50% (95%CI, 32-67%) and the 2-year OS was 71% (95%CI, 52–83%). Conclusion The TAXIF II protocol was highly effective in non-refractory GCT patients failing CT. Disclosure F. Selle: consultancy for roche and Pharmamar. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Who, When, and What Type?

Early randomized trials of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) over conventional chemotherapy. However, in the era of novel agents for myeloma in conjunction with the evolution of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, many new questions arise. First, how can novel agents be incorporated into the transplant paradigm? Given the efficacy of new induction regimens, should transplant be delayed until relapse? Also, in the era of individualized medicine, chronologic age alone should not drive decisions regarding transplantation. Therefore, the feasibility and role of transplantation in older patients with myeloma is being studied. The controversy of transplant type (i.e., autologous compared with reduced intensity allogeneic transplant) remains unresolved. Several large international trials have demonstrated conflicting results in regard to an overall survival (OS) benefit with the allogeneic approach. The role of allogeneic transplant remains under study especially in the high-risk population, which has high relapse rates with traditional autologous approaches. Future directions to reduce relapse include post-transplantation consolidation and maintenance therapy with either approved agents or new agents and immunotherapy, either vaccine based or natural killer (NK) and T-cell based.

42 A therapeutic sphingosine 1-phosphate antibody inhibits intratumoural hypoxia and sensitizes to chemotherapy in prostate cancer animal model

High-dose chemotherapy regimens can cure a number of otherwise incurable diseases, such as Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, neuroblastoma, acute leukemia (in remission), and breast cancer. Trials of high-dose chemotherapy have generally used autologous bone marrow transplant or peripheral blood stem cell support to ensure hematologic recovery after intensive chemotherapy and/or radiation. This report describes an approach in which high-dose carboplatin chemotherapy was followed initially by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Escherichia coli. Sandoz-Schering, East Hanover and Kenilworth, NJ) and in subsequent patients, by both GM-CSF and repeated cycles of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection and administration. The addition of PBPC to this regimen led to significant reductions in the duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the requirement for erythrocyte and platelet transfusions, the length of hospital stay, and the use of intravenous antibiotics in this group relative to those patients who received GM-CSF alone. In addition, laboratory studies are presented that show a direct correlation between the number of progenitor cells reinfused and the duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The report also reviews data indicating that circulating progenitor cells are depleted by this approach. This suggests that the number of progenitor cells available for mobilization is finite. Finally, the magnitude of these effects, and their implications for future trials with repetitive cycles of dose-intensive therapy, are discussed.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment in patients with multiple relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors

BackgroundSurvival after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment (SST) in multiple relapsed germ-cell tumors (GCTs). Patients and methodsExisting databases in Berlin and Marburg of HDCT trials from 1989 to 2008 were retrospectively screened. Among 534 patients, 71 of 534 (13%) patients were scheduled for HDCT having failed previous conventional-dose first-line and first-salvage chemotherapy regimens; those 49 patients who had received at least cisplatin plus etoposide first-line as well as conventional-dose cisplatin-based first-salvage regimens and were diagnosed after 1 January 1990 were further analyzed. ResultsMedian age at SST was 32 years (range 19–52 years). Median follow-up for surviving patients was 4 years (range 1.7–8.5 years). Three of 49 (6%) patients either progressed or died before scheduled HDCT; the remaining 46 of 49 (94%) received either single or sequential HDCT. The rate of favorable responses to HDCT was 27 of 49 (55%). Nine patients remain alive and free of progression. One additional patient was lost to follow without progression at 4 years. The projected overall survival rate at 5 years was 17% (95% confidence intervals 7% to 30%). ConclusionHDCT can induce remissions in patients with multiple relapsed GCTs with a long-term survival rate of ∼17%.

Strategies to Improve Long-Term Outcome in Stage IIIB Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Multimodality Treatment Including Dose-Intensive Induction and High-Dose Chemotherapy

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare clinicopathologic entity with a poor prognosis, lagging far behind any other form of nonmetastatic breast cancer. Since the advent of systemic chemotherapy over 35 years ago, only minimal progress has been made in long-term outcome. Although multiple randomized trials of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous progenitor cell transplantation (ASCT) for the treatment of breast cancer have yielded disappointing results, these data are not necessarily relevant to IBC, a distinct clinical and pathologic entity. Therefore, the optimal multimodality therapy for IBC is not well established, and remains unsatisfactory. We treated 21 women with nonmetastatic IBC with a multimodality strategy including high-dose melphalan (Mel)/etoposide and ASCT. The treatment was overall tolerated with acceptable morbidity, and no post-ASCT 100-day mortality. With a median potential follow-up of approximately 8 years, the estimated progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) at 6 years from on-study date are: 67%, 55%, and 69%, respectively. These results from a small phase II study are among the most promising of mature outcome data for IBC. They strongly suggest, along with results of several already published phase II trials, that ASCT could play a significant role in the first line treatment of IBC.

Dose-dense and high-dose chemotherapy plus rituximab with autologous stem cell transplantation for primary treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis: a phase II multicenter study

We investigated the addition of rituximab to dose-dense and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with untreated poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ninety-four young patients (age, 18-60) with stage III-IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at intermediate/high or high risk according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index were enrolled into a phase II trial. The treatment was as follows: four courses of bi-weekly rituximab-cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-vincristine-prednisone (R-MegaCEOP14), two courses of rituximab-mitoxantrone-cytarabine-dexamethasone (R-MAD) and carmustine-etoposide-cytarabine-melphalan (BEAM) with autologous stem cell transplantation. The complete response and toxic death rates were 82% and 5%, respectively. Failure-free survival and overall survival rates at 4 years were 73% and 80%, respectively. The outcomes of these patients were retrospectively compared to those of 41 patients with similar characteristics enrolled into a previous phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy without rituximab. This historical group was treated with eight weekly infusions of methotrexate-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone-bleomycin (MACOP-B), two courses of MAD and BEAM with autologous stem cell transplantation. The 4-year failure-free survival rates for the rituximab and historical groups were 73% versus 44%, respectively (p=0.001); the 4-year overall survival rates were 80% and 54%, respectively (p=0.002). A Cox's multivariable model was applied to adjust the effect of treatment for unbalanced or important prognostic factors: failure and death risks were significantly reduced in the rituximab group compared to the historical group, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.44 (p=0.01) for failure-free survival and 0.46 (p=0.02) for overall survival. These results suggest that the addition of rituximab to high-dose chemotherapy is effective and safe in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a poor-prognosis and such regimens need to be compared to dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation in randomized trials.

High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell support in the management of metastatic germ cell cancer: A quantitative review

e16094 Background: To analyze the independent associates of outcome in metastatic germ cell cancer (MGCC) patients treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell rescue. Methods: Thirty-two published patient cohorts with MGCC (encompassing 2176 patients; 510 patients treated upfront and 1666 at relapse) were identified from PUBMED and Cochrane Registry of Clinical Trials. Weighed Regression Analyses of these trials were conducted to define prognosticators. Results: Correlate of overall survival (OAS) and survival with no evidence of disease (NED) in upfront HDC trials was number of chemotherapeutics in HDC (OAS with 2 agents: 60% vs. 3 or more agents: 72%, p = 0.047, survival with NED with 2 agents: 47% vs. 3 or more agents: 64%, p = 0.009). In trials of HDC at relapse, independent associates of OAS with multivariate analysis were line of chemotherapy index, an indicator of line of chemotherapy utilization (p = 0.004), and median age (≤30: 42%, >30: 49%, p = 0.023), whereas independent correlates of better survival with NED were again number of chemotherapeutics in HDC (2 agents: 54% vs. 3 or more agents: 33%, p = 0.001), and seminoma fraction (seminoma fraction ≤9%: 28% vs. seminoma fraction >9%: 49%, p < 0.001 ). Toxic mortality of HDC regimens employed in these trials ranged between 0% and 17%. Conclusions: HDC can cure patients with MGCC both as initial or salvage therapies. However, this study shows that type and setting of HDC, as well as patient age, and seminoma fraction all appear to be linked with benefit from HDC in MGCC. Future trials should continue to address the usage of tandem HDC cycles with multiagent protocols in high risk patients with MGCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cross-validation of a new prognostic index integrating tumor marker decline in patients with relapsed disseminated germ cell tumors

5086 Background: Early serum tumor marker decline during chemotherapy was previously shown to be prognostic for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with relapsed GCT in an analysis of the IT94 phase III trial, which compared conventional chemotherapy versus high dose chemotherapy (Massard C, ASCO 2008. Abstract No. 5085). The aim of this study was to validate this concept in an independent set of patients. Methods: Data on tumor site, response to first line chemotherapy, serum tumor markers at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy were obtained from 235 patients accrued in the IT94 trial (training set) and from 181 patients included in phase III prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy conducted by the German GCT group (Lorch et al, J Clin Oncol. 2007) (validation set). The change from baseline of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was assessed and classified into ‘favorable marker decline‘ and ‘unfavorable marker decline‘ group, as previously described (ASCO 2008. Abstract No. 5085). Results: In both series, favourable serum AFP decline was significantly associated with a better 2-year PFS (46% vs 24%; p < 0.0001) and OS (62% vs 34%; p = 0.0013) while serum hCG decline did not affect outcome. In multivariate analysis of the IT94 trial, an unfavorable AFP decline and a mediastinal primary site were adverse prognostic factors for both PFS and OS, and this was confirmed in the validation set. Among patients from the good prognostic group (favorable AFP decline and non-mediastinal primary site), those who were treated with high-dose chemotherapy had a better PFS (2-year PFS rate: 54% vs 37%; HR = 0.62; p = 0.017), and a trend for a better OS (2-year OS rate: 68% vs. 58%; HR = 0.77; p = 0.29) as compared to patients who were treated with conventional chemotherapy. In contrast, there was no difference in outcome in patients from the poor prognostic group (unfavourable AFP decline and/or mediastinal primary site), whether they received conventional chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy. Conclusions: AFP decline during the first 6 weeks of salvage chemotherapy and a mediastinal primary tumor site predict for PFS and OS in patients with relapsed disseminated GCT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) supported by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients (pts) with disseminated germ-cell tumors (GCTs) failing chemotherapy and with adverse prognostic factors: The TAXIF II protocol

5028 Background: HDCT using the etoposide-carboplatin ± ifosfamide regimen is able to circumvent resistance in GCT pts, even when used as third-line or later therapy (Lotz, Ann Onco.l 2005 / Einhorn, N Eng J Med. 2007). Pts whose relapses occur more than 4 w after CDDP-based CT are probably the best candidates for HDCT. Epirubicine (E) and paclitaxel (P) possess interesting activity in GCTs. Thiotepa (TTP) and P can be safely combined at HD with good efficacy. The ICE regimen is a well-known worldwide used regimen. Methods: Non-resistant/refractory GCTs pts failing CT and with adverse prognostic factors were planned to receive 2 cycles combining (mg/m2) E (100) and P (250), given on day 1 and 14 supported by filgrastim (F), followed by 3 consecutive HDCTs [1 course combining a 3-d combination of P (360) + TTP (720), followed by 2 ICE regimens (IFM, 12 g/m2, CBDCA, AUC 20, VP16, 1,500 mg/m2), given on 5 days with HSCT and F]. Inclusion criterias were mainly: radiologically and/or biologically mesurable disease, seminomatous GCT in relapse after 2 lines of CT (BEP/VeIP), non-seminomatous GCT in relapse after 1 or 2 lines of CT or in PR after 1 line of CT, primary mediastinal GCT in first relapse. Resistant / refractory pts were excluded. PBSC were collected after the first ± the second courses of EP (aim: 9x10E6 CD34+/kg BW). We report herein on the preliminary results of this multicentric study. Results: From 09/04 to 12/07, 45 pre-treated (BEP ± VeIP) pts with gonadal (89%) or extra-gonadal T (11%) were treated in second-line (27%), 3rd-line (44 %) or more (29 %). Thirty-five pts received 1 HDCT, 29 two HDCTs and 21 pts could receive the whole protocol. At the time of analysis (12/08), the final overall response rate was 47%, 10 pts were in continuous CR (median time, 8 m; range, 1–18), and 37 pts (82%) were alive at a median F/U of 9 m (range, 1–26). The 1-y survival rate was 90%. The 1-y PFS rate was 62%. One pt died of multi-organ failure and 7 died of disease progression. Conclusions: This HDCT program preceded by 2 semi-intensive cycles of E-P is highly effective in non-resistant/refractory pts with disseminated GCTS failing CT and with adverse prognostic factors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Lessons learned from a decade of clinical trials of high-dose chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most chemosensitive solid tumors and therefore a good example to explore high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Interest in pursuing this treatment arose in the late 1980s following the success of HDC in treating hematological cancers and improvements in supportive care with peripheral blood stem cells. Experience from phase II trials and analysis of Bone Marrow Transplant Registry data led to the launch of several randomized phase III trials in the late 1990 s. Initial enthusiasm for this treatment was in part due to the preliminary positive data emerging from HDC in breast cancer. Five randomized trials of HDC in ovarian cancer have been conducted and all experienced difficulty in recruitment. Their different designs and results are reviewed, as well as some of the lessons that have been learned about HDC in solid tumors in the last decade.

Randomized Trial of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Peripheral-Blood Stem-Cell Support Compared With Standard-Dose Chemotherapy in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: NCIC MA.16

We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; HDCT) compared with standard-dose therapy. Between April 1997 and December 2000, 386 women with MBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were registered. After initial response to anthracycline- or taxane-based induction chemotherapy, 224 patients were randomly assigned: 112 to high-dose cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and carboplatin chemotherapy and ASCT (HDCT), and 112 to standard therapy (ST). Median age was 47 years (range, 25 to 67 years). Thirty two percent of women randomly assigned had estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer, 42% had visceral metastases, and 58% had bone metastases. Complete remission rates before random assignment were 11% for those receiving HDCT and 12% for those receiving ST. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 79 deaths were observed in the HDCT arm and 77 deaths were observed in the ST arm; seven patients (6%) in the HDCT arm died as a result of toxicity. The median OS was 24 months for the HDCT arm (95% CI, 21 to 35 months) and 28 months for ST (95% CI, 22 to 33 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2; P = .43). PFS was 11 months for HDCT and 9 months for ST (HR, 0.6 in favor of HDCT; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9; P = .006). HDCT did not improve OS in women with MBC when used as consolidation after response to induction chemotherapy.

Autologous non-myeloablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory systemic vasculitis

Objective:For patients with systemic vasculitis (SV) refractory to conventional therapy, new treatment strategies aimed at aggressive induction of remission and relapse prevention are being sought. We herein report our single-centre...

Prognostic significance of overexpression and phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the presence of truncated EGFRvIII in locoregionally advanced breast cancer.

The prognostic value of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in breast cancer and more specifically, in patients with locoregionally advanced disease, is still undefined. We hypothesized that EGFR status plays a major prognostic role in this setting, through expression, activation, or the presence of its mutated variant EGFRvIII. We reviewed tumor samples of 225 patients treated uniformly in prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy for four to nine positive axillary nodes, > or = 10 positive nodes, or inflammatory carcinoma, and observed for a median of 9 years (range, 3 to 13 years). We analyzed the effect on outcome of expression of EGFR, phosphorylated EGFR (phospho-EGFR), and EGFRvIII, as studied by immunohistochemistry. EGFR expression, phospho-EGFR, and mutated EGFRvIII were detected in 43%, 54%, and 4% of the patients, respectively. EGFR expression correlated with negative hormone receptor status, and was associated with significantly worse relapse-free survival (59% v 79%; P < .001) and overall survival (61% v 81%; P = .001) than no expression. There was no association of phospho-EGFR or EGFRvIII with outcome. Multivariate models confirmed the prognostic effect of EGFR independent of other known prognostic variables in this population. The prognostic value of EGFR was most prominent in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) -positive and the estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative subgroups. EGFR expression, but not phospho-EGFR or EGFRvIII expression, is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with high-risk primary breast cancer, particularly when it is coexpressed with HER-2. Our results suggest the potential benefit of dual EGFR/HER-2 receptor targeting in this setting.

Prognostic analysis of tumour angiogenesis, determined by microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, in high-risk primary breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy

In contrast to early breast cancer, the prognostic effect of tumour angiogenesis in tumours with advanced axillary spread has been less studied. We retrospectively analysed the effect of microvessel density (MVD) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by immunohistochemistry on the outcome of 215 patients treated uniformly within prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy for 4–9 and ⩾10 positive nodes, and followed for a median of 9 (range 3–13) years. Microvessel density was associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (P<0.001) and tumour size (P=0.001). Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression (51% of patients) was associated with overexpression of EGFR (P=0.01) and HER2 (P<0.05), but not with MVD (P=0.3). High MVD was associated with worse relapse-free survival (74 vs 44%, P<0.001) and overall survival (76 vs 44%, P<0.001). Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression had no effect on outcome. Multivariate analyses showed a prognostic effect of MVD independently of other known prognostic factors in this patient population. In conclusion, tumour angiogenesis, expressed as MVD, is a major independent prognostic factor in breast cancer patients with extensive axillary involvement.

Frontline autologous stem cell transplantation in high‐risk peripheral T‐cell lymphoma: a prospective study from The Gel‐Tamo Study Group

Retrospective data shows that peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients sensitive to conventional chemotherapy for aggressive lymphomas may respond better if this treatment is consolidated with frontline autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Here, we present data from a prospective phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT as a frontline consolidation therapy for aggressive nodal PTCL. This study involved 26 gallium-scan-positive patients with high-risk nodal PTCL [excluding anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive]. Patients received three courses of MegaCHOP before they were evaluated, and those that were gallium-scan-negative at this stage then received another course of MegaCHOP and ASCT. Patients who remained gallium-scan-positive received two courses of an IFE regimen (ifosfamide 10 g/m(2), etoposide 150 mg/m(2)/12 h on days 1-3) and if they at least achieved PR, they then received the transplant. Complete response (CR) was achieved by 12 patients (46%) after three courses of MegaCHOP and 12 patients received IFE as a salvage therapy. After the ASCT (n = 19), 89% of patients achieved CR. In contrast, six patients (23%) did not receive the transplant because of the progression of the disease (n = 5) or lethal toxicity (n = 1). One patient in first-line CR refused ASCT. After a median follow-up of 35 months, the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 yr was 73% and 53%, respectively. Moreover, the OS, PFS and disease-free survival (DFS) were 84%, 56% and 63%, respectively 2 yr after transplant in patients who received ASCT consolidation (n = 19). Early salvage therapy for patients with high-risk aggressive nodal PTCL that do not achieve CR after three courses of chemotherapy and ASCT frontline consolidation for chemosensitive patients may improve treatment outcome.

What Is the Optimal Salvage Therapy for Patients with Relapsed Germ-Cell Tumors?

A substantial number of patients with advanced germ-cell tumors who relapse within 2 years of initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy can be rendered long-term survivors either with salvage chemotherapy (various cisplatin-based triplet regimens) or with high-dose chemotherapy — typically carboplatin plus etoposide with stem-cell rescue. Despite this demonstrated utility, the settings in which high-dose chemotherapy can be applied optimally remain unclear. In two earlier prospective trials of high-dose chemotherapy — one as initial therapy in patients with poor-risk disease (Journal Watch Hematology and Oncology Feb 5 2007) and one …