Trial Of Chemoimmunotherapy Research Articles

Final analysis of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectivesNeoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown promising results for resectable, locoregionally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (L/A HNSCC). We published the first phase II trial of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in resectable, L/A HNSCC, demonstrating it was safe and feasible with favorable pathological complete response (pCR). Here, we report the final analysis results for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in L/A HNSCC (minimum 2.0 years of follow-up). Materials and methodsThree cycles of chemoimmunotherapy were administered before surgery to patients with L/A HNSCC. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QOL) were reported. ResultsThe overall two-year DFS and OS rates were 90 % and 100 %, respectively. With a median follow-up of 33.7 months, 9 of 10 (90 %) patients with pCR were alive and disease free. Patients with TNM stage (II/III) or < 20 % of residual viable tumor trended toward improved DFS; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.04–5.28] and HR, 0.26 (95 % CI, 0.03–2.36), respectively. All QLQ-C30 functioning and symptom scales other than nausea and vomiting were resolved at 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy. ConclusionNeoadjuvant camrelizumab in combination with chemotherapy provided encouraging clinical outcomes for patients with L/A HNSCC. Further studies with longer follow-up and larger samples are warranted.Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900025303. Registered Aug 22, 2019. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=41380.

Validation of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response in operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy trials.

4065 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy (ChT) is a standard for operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved pathological complete response (pCR) with unclear survival advantages in an unselected population. In the advanced setting, PD-L1 is a validated biomarker of response to ICIs. We aimed to assess its predictive role in the early stages wherein remains unexplored. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant or peri-operative ChT +/- ICIs in non-metastatic GEA, published between 2006-2024. Biomarker-unselected phase 2/3 or phase 3 RCTs with an active comparator were selected. Odds ratios (ORs) for pathological response (defined as pCR, ypT0, or ypT≤1), the primary outcome of this meta-analysis, were extracted and analysed using a random-effect meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis (ICI-ChT versus ChT) was performed to estimate the pooled effect of peri-operative ICIs on pathological response. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for between-study heterogeneity. We then extracted pCR data by PD-L1 (cutoffs 1, 5, 10) from phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant ICIs+ChT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) published between 2006-2024. Weighted Pearson trial-level correlation and a meta-regression model were used to assess the relationship of PD-L1 with pCR. Results: Nine RCTs were eligible for the analysis, one of which had two experimental arms contributing to two comparisons. Of 5359 included patients, 1302 received ICI-ChT and 4057 systemic ChT. ICI-ChT showed a significant improvement in pathological response (pooled OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.81-4.63, p&lt;0.001) with a larger effect compared to ChT-only trials (pooled OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.79, p=0.007). Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses of pCR-only, non-Asian, and since-FLOT studies. Fourteen studies were included in the phase 2 trials dataset (n=10 ICI+ChT and n=4 ICI+CRT) accounting for 708 patients receiving ICIs. PD-L1 showed a moderate positive correlation with pCR, stronger for higher cut-offs (weighted R for cut-offs 1, 5, and 10: 0.33, 0.51, and 0.65, respectively) and after exclusion of CRT trials (weighted R for cut-offs 5 and 10: 0.67 and 0.99, respectively). In a mixed-effect meta-regression model, PD-L1 ≥5 was a significant predictor of response (effect size [ES]: 0.71, 95% CI, 0.29-1.13, p=0.001), even after accounting for the backbone treatment (ChT versus CRT) (ES: 0.60, 95% CI, 0.20-1.00, p=0.003). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ICI-ChT consistently improves pathological response in operable GEA, particularly in PD-L1-positive tumours. PD-L1 ≥5 appears a significant biomarker of pCR in non-metastatic GEA, supporting stratification by PD-L1 and biomarker-selected trials for evaluation at the individual patient level.

Immune features are associated with response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) alone, and ICI in combination with chemotherapy, have demonstrated promising pathologic response (<pT2) in the neoadjuvant setting. In LCCC1520 (NCT02690558), a phase 2 single-arm trial of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pembrolizumab; NAC-ICI) for MIBC, 22/39 patients responded (pathologic downstaging as primary outcome), as previously described. Here, we report post-hoc correlative analyses. Treatment was associated with changes in tumor mutational profile, immune gene signatures, and RNA subtype switching. Clinical response was associated with an increase in plasma IL-9 from pre-treatment to initiation of cycle 2 of therapy. Tumors harbored diverse predicted antigen landscapes that change across treatment and are associated with APOBEC, tobacco, and other etiologies. Higher pre-treatment tumor PD-L1 and TIGIT RNA expression were associated with complete response. IL-8 signature and Stroma-rich subtype were associated with improved response to NAC-ICI versus neoadjuvant ICI (ABACUS trial, NCT02662309). Plasma IL-9 represents a potential predictive biomarker of NAC-ICI response, while tumor IL-8 signature and stroma-rich subtype represent potential predictive biomarkers of response benefit of NAC-ICI over neoadjuvant ICI. Future efforts must include additional independent biomarker discovery and validation, ultimately to improve the selection of patients for ICI-related treatments.

Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A large real-world experience

IntroductionFirst-line systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUC) consists of platinum-based chemotherapy in most patients and PD1/L1 inhibitors in selected patients. Multiple combination chemoimmunotherapy trials failed to show a clear benefit over chemotherapy alone. We used real-world data to evaluate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of first-line chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination chemoimmunotherapy treatment for metastatic bladder cancer and examined differences in overall survival (OS). Materials and MethodsWe used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stage IV mUC diagnosed between 2014 and 2018, who were treated with first-line immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or combination treatment. We performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine factors associated with treatment receipt Adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the association between treatment and OS. ResultsIn our cohort of 4,169 patients, multivariable analysis identified increasing age (RRR: 1.07, 95%CI, 1.06–1.08) and comorbidity burden (, as independent predictors of receiving immunotherapy. Treatment at an academic facility was associated with increased likelihood of combination treatment (RRR: 1.29, 95%CI, 1.01–1.65). After IPTW, we found that combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95%CI, 0.62–0.83) was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy. ConclusionsPatients with older age and more comorbidities were more likely to receive immunotherapy than chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Utilization of chemoimmunotherapy was observed to be higher in academic centers and was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy.

Abstract PR005: Final results from a Phase I trial of intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for patients with BCG-exposed high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Abstract Background: Although retreatment with BCG is considered standard of care for patients with BCG-exposed high-grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), less than 50% of patients are expected to respond. As such, the ability to augment the efficacy of BCG in this population remains a critical unmet need. Preclinical studies suggest that intravesical gemcitabine (Gem) may demonstrate synergistic efficacy with BCG by favorably altering the tumor microenvironment. We therefore sought to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary clinical efficacy of GemBCG in patients with BCG-exposed HG NMIBC through an IRB-approved Phase I/II clinical trial. Methods: Patients with BCG-exposed papillary HG NMIBC (Ta/T1) with or without carcinoma in situ (CIS) that recurred within 24 months of BCG therapy were eligible for this trial. Exclusion criteria included BCG-unresponsive disease, contraindication to BCG therapy, or ureteral/urethral urothelial disease. Consenting patients underwent complete transurethral resection of bladder tumors followed by intravesical Gem twice weekly (weeks 1, 4, 7, 10) for a total of 8 doses. Dose escalation of Gem was performed from 50-2000 mg using a Bayesian modified continual reassessment method. Intravesical Gem instillations alternated with weekly intravesical TICE BCG therapy (weeks 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9) for a total of 6 doses fixed at 50 mg followed by maintenance BCG in responders. Complete response (CR) rates and progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or cystectomy were evaluated at 12 months of follow up in the Phase I cohort. Results: A total of 25 patients was enrolled (median age 70 years [IQR 64-75]), all of which have at least 12 months of follow up. Of these, 88% (22/25) were male. Median duration of bladder cancer treatment prior to enrollment was 385 days (IQR 173-634), and 28% (7/25) previously received either maintenance therapy (3/25) or &amp;gt;1 induction courses of BCG (4/25). Based on centralized pathology review, a total of 68% had CIS ± papillary disease (8 HGTa, 5 HGT1, and 4 Tis), while 32% had papillary-only disease (4 HGTa and 4 HGT1). No dose limiting toxicities were observed, and 14/25 patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose. The treatment was well tolerated with no patient experiencing treatment-related Grade 3-5 toxicity. CR rates at 6 months and 12 months were 96% (24/25) and 92% (23/25), respectively. No progression to MIBC or radical cystectomy was observed. Conclusion: Combination GemBCG in BCG-exposed HG NMIBC is well tolerated and appears to provide excellent cancer control. Based on these encouraging findings and the ongoing phase II portion (NCT04179162), a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing GemBCG to BCG alone for BCG-exposed NMIBC is planned through the National Clinical Trial Network (Alliance A032303). Citation Format: Syed M. Alam, Christopher D. Gaffney, Jessica Lavery, Merve Basar, Neeta D'Souza, Christian Hernandez, Melissa McCarter, Patricia Moran, Kristen Stasi, Kara Worth, Daniel Sjoberg, Guido Dalbagni, Timothy Donahue, Sherri Donat, Dean Bajorin, Bernard H. Bochner, Alvin Goh, Judy Sarungbam, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Eugene J. Pietzak. Final results from a Phase I trial of intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for patients with BCG-exposed high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2024 May 17-20; Charlotte, NC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(10_Suppl):Abstract nr PR005.

Abstract B007: Urinary cytokine profiles reflect rationale for treatment with gemcitabine and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in BCG-exposed high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

Abstract Background: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains the most efficacious and widely studied intravesical therapy for NMIBC, but less than 50% of BCG-exposed patients will respond to a second course of BCG. One mechanism of resistance to BCG is an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment with myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), and Tregs that abrogate the anti-tumor immune response. IL-6 is associated with MDSCs and BCG resistance. Gemcitabine (Gem), however, has been shown to selectively inhibit MDSCs, TAMs, and Tregs. This observation served as the biologic rationale for our recently completed Phase I trial of combination chemoimmunotherapy with intravesical Gem and BCG for BCG-exposed high-grade (HG) NMIBC (NCT04179162) that demonstrated excellent tolerability and preliminary efficacy (96% complete response at 6-month follow-up). We sought to evaluate immune modulation with the addition of Gem to BCG as determined by changes in urinary cytokine/chemokine levels. Methods: Patients with BCG-exposed papillary HG NMIBC (Ta/T1) +/- carcinoma in situ recurring within 24 months of BCG therapy were treated with intravesical Gem twice weekly (weeks 1,4,7,10; 8 total doses) and intravesical TICE BCG weekly (weeks 2,3,5,6,8,9; 6 total doses) followed by SWOG maintenance BCG for responders. Urine specimens were collected prior to treatment and on weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after on-trial treatment initiation. Urinary cytokines present in the supernatant were evaluated using a 96-plex immuno-oncology proximity extension assay (Olink®). Cytokines with &amp;lt; 75% of values below the lower limit of detection of the assay were not evaluated. We performed an exploratory analysis of select pre-specified cytokines using a linear mixed model. Mean changes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented with global p-values testing for a change in cytokine levels at any timepoint. Results: Urine samples were available for all 25 patients in the Phase I study. A total of 25 proteins on the panel were excluded due to low detection. Chemokines associated with T-cell trafficking (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11) increased during induction treatment through 3 months of follow up and then returned to baseline after the completion of treatment (p&amp;lt;0.001 for each cytokine). IL-6 decreased after initiation of treatment and remained low through 12 months of follow up (-2.7, 95% CI -3.8, -1.7; p&amp;lt;0.001). Notably, the one patient who had a recurrence also had a rise in IL-6 after an initial decline while on treatment. Conclusion: We found evidence that the addition of intravesical gemcitabine to BCG favorably augments the tumor microenvironment based on changes in urinary cytokine/chemokine profiles. Additional tumor and urinary correlatives are ongoing. Based on the the robust preliminary efficacy demonstrated in the ongoing phase I/II trial (NCT04179162), a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing GemBCG to BCG alone for BCG-exposed NMIBC is planned through the National Clinical Trial Network (Alliance A032303). Citation Format: Christopher D. Gaffney, Syed M. Alam, Jessica A. Lavery, Merve Basar, Neeta D'Souza, Christian Hernandez, Melissa McCarter, Patricia Moran, Kristen Stasi, Kara Worth, Daniel Sjoberg, Guido Dalbagni, Timothy Donahue, Sherri Donat, Dean Bajorin, Bernard H. Bochner, Alvin Goh, Judy Sarungbam, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Eugene J. Pietzak. Urinary cytokine profiles reflect rationale for treatment with gemcitabine and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in BCG-exposed high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2024 May 17-20; Charlotte, NC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(10_Suppl):Abstract nr B007.

LIBRETTO-431: Confirming the Superiority of Selpercatinib to Chemotherapy and the Lack of Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced RET Fusion-Positive (RET+) NSCLC, Another Unique Never-Smoker Predominant Molecular Subtype of NSCLC.

Selpercatinib, a potent and highly selective RET kinase inhibitor with significant CNS activity, has recently gained US approval for the treatment of NSCLC harboring RET fusions (RET+) based on a large-scale single-arm study. The LIBRETTO-431 trial was the global pivotal registration phase 3 trial comparing selpercatinib to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced RET+ NSCLC. Never-smokers constituted 67.4% of the RET+ NSCLC patients enrolled. KIF5B-RET made up the vast majority (77%) of the RET+ fusion variant with known fusion partner. The results of this study demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) benefit as well as impressive intracranial disease response in participants treated with selpercatinib as compared to those treated with chemotherapy, with a HR [hazard ratio] of 0.46 (95% CI 0.33-0.70; P < 0.001) for the intention-to-treat (ITT)-pembrolizumab group and HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.31-0.70, P < 0.001) for the overall ITT-group of patients. The addition of pembrolizumab to platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy resulted in numerically identical PFS (11.2 months). These results point to selpercatinib's superiority to traditional chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of NSCLC harboring RET fusions and add to literature on the salience of targeted precision oncology and lack of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor in NSCLC patients with never-smoker predominant actionable driver mutations. RET+ NSCLC should be added to the list of molecular subtypes (EGFR+, ALK+, ROS1+) of NSCLC to be excluded in chemoimmunotherapy trial.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC

To date, no meta-analyses have comprehensively assessed the association of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized and nonrandomized settings. In addition, there exists controversy concerning the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with NSCLC with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels less than 1%. To compare neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapy by adverse events and surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes using recently published randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized trials. MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2013, to October 25, 2023, for all clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy that included at least 10 patients. Observational studies and trials reporting the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy monotherapy, were excluded. Surgical, pathological, and efficacy end points and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Among 43 eligible trials comprising 5431 patients (4020 males [74.0%]; median age range, 55-70 years), there were 8 randomized clinical trials with 3387 patients. For randomized clinical trials, pooled overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; I2 = 0%), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67; I2 = 14.9%), major pathological response (risk ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.83-4.15; I2 = 31.2%), and complete pathological response (risk ratio, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.25-7.15; I2 = 27.4%) favored neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with baseline tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1%, there was a significant benefit in event-free survival for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89; I2 = 0%). This study found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy across surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes. These findings suggest that patients with resectable NSCLC with tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1% may have an event-free survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Re-inventing a better wheel? Serplulimab for squamous cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have reshaped the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, chemoimmunotherapy trials dedicated to squamous NSCLC are limited. In this issue of Cancer Cell, Zhou etal. demonstrate serplulimab plus chemotherapy as an effective first-line regimen to treat patients with advanced squamous NSCLC.

Heterogeneity between subgroups of first-line chemoimmunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Differences in clinicopathological characteristics of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients may influence the immune response. This study aims to evaluate the heterogeneity of response to first-line chemoimmunotherapy between subgroups in ES-SCLC to screen out suitable populations. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 3, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ES-SCLC chemoimmunotherapy. We also reviewed main conferences from January 1, 2021 to October 1, 2023.A trial-specific hazard ratio (HR) ratio for each subgroup was calculated, and these ratios were then pooled using the deft approach. A total of 9 RCTs with 4099 patients were finally included. The pooled ratios were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.09) for OS-HRs and 0.79 (95% CI = 0.55 to 1.13) for PFS-HRs in women versus men. The pooled ratios of OS-HRs and PFS-HRs in patients with positive versus negative PD-L1 expression were 1.26 (95% CI= 0.91 to 1.73) and 1.08 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.52), respectively. The pooled ratios of OS-HRs and PFS-HRs in patients without versus with brain metastasis were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.59 to 1.01) and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.44 to 1.12). No statistically significant differences were also found in terms of subgroups for age, liver metastasis, smoking status, ECOG PS, LDH level, type of platinum salt and race. Women or patients with negative PD-L1 expression or with LDH ≤ ULN or without brain metastasis tend to benefit more from first-line chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC. More trials are needed to prospectively validate the therapeutic heterogeneity among clinicopathological characteristics. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-3-0064/ identifier, INPLASY202330064.

Imaging Mass Cytometry Reveals a Highly Heterogenous Cell Makeup of the Follicular Lymphoma Tumour Microenvironment

The highly variable clinical course and response to treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) is strongly influenced by the tumor microenvironment (TME). While both pro- and anti-tumor effects depend on cell-cell interactions within the TME, these mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Bulk (Dave et al. NEJM 2004) and single-cell RNA-seq studies have identified signatures associated with prognosis, e.g., ‘T cell depleted’ microenvironments that are linked with inferior clinical outcomes (Han et al. Blood Cancer Discov. 2022). While such research has shed light on the TME, single-cell studies often lack spatial context and conventional immunohistochemistry is limited by a low number of parameters. Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows multiplexed analysis of up to 40 markers in tissue simultaneously, offering a unique opportunity to study the spatial features of single cells within the TME, informing both disease biology and predictors of clinical outcome. To our knowledge, IMC has more commonly been applied to solid malignancies. FL presents unique challenges in this remit, such as its morphologic variability and phenotyping cells within highly structured, dense lymph-node tissue composed of inherent tight-knit microenvironments. To analyse FL tissue by IMC, we first optimized a 31-plex panel to identify key immune and non-immune lineages including tumor cells, T and NK cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, dendritic, endothelial and reticular cells. Additionally, we wished to identify functional states such as memory, effector or regulatory phenotypes in addition to other parameters including activation, exhaustion and proliferation. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) biopsies from 100 untreated FL patients enrolled on the Gallium trial (NCT01332968) of frontline chemo-immunotherapy, were subjected to IMC. In total, 381 highly multiplexed images were acquired; 13 were excluded due to suboptimal image quality. Following image pre-processing and deep-learning based cell segmentation, we analysed &amp;gt;3.5 million cells across 368 high-dimensional images (mean=9659 cells, SD=4600). To effectively phenotype large numbers of cells, we constructed a workflow incorporating ‘ASTIR’ (Geuenich et al. Cell Syst. 2021) - a publicly available marker-based algorithm - and cell clustering to identify population subsets. We identified 95 cell populations including Lymphoma subsets (variable CD10, CD11c, CD80 expression), CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets (memory, naïve, exhausted etc) and a range of non-lymphoid cells including myeloid and stromal cells. Of particular interest, we found a CD4+ CD3+ PD1+ ICOS+ population which are likely T follicular helper cells (Tfh). On average, Tfh-like cells constitute 1.9% of cells per image (SD=3.1%), although we a found considerable range in their presence. Given previous associations with Tfh cells and FL prognosis we are investigating this variability in further detail. In addition, we have identified ~30 samples enriched for CD57+ T cells, a phenotype suggestive of functional senescence. Amongst substantial heterogeneity of identified cell phenotypes (Fig A), we have identified variable sample sets characterised by enrichment or depletion of i) Lymphoma vs. T-cells (Fig B) and ii) Macrophage vs. T-cell subsets, consistent with previous single cell studies. Here, we report the use of IMC to examine the TME of untreated FL, observing marked heterogeneity of cell phenotypes across FL. Future work seeks to examine prognostic associations between the frequency of cell subsets and their spatial interactions, with this clinically annotated dataset derived from the front-line GALLIUM study. This work will provide a detailed characterization of how the spatial context of FL TME influences disease behaviour, response to treatment and survival. Given the high-throughput and high-plex nature of this study, ultimately, we aim to distil this multitude of information into condensed biomarker(s), to provide potential insights into enhancing diagnostic and/or prognostic capabilities. Therefore, we aim to derive meaningful clinical correlates associated to outcome that can be ultimately translated into practice.

Association of socioeconomic factors with the receipt of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with non–small cell lung cancer

BackgroundNeoadjuvant therapy (NT) will be increasingly used for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly given the recent approval of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Several barriers may prevent the uptake of NT and should be identified and addressed. We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine predictors of the use of NT. MethodsUsing the NCDB (2006-2019), we identified 80,707 patients who underwent surgery for clinical stage II and III NSCLC. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were reviewed, and univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify associations with the uptake of NT. In propensity score–matched groups, survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsAmong 80,707 eligible patients, 17,262 (21.4%) received NT. Clinical stage and node positivity were associated with receipt of NT. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower rates of NT included black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.90), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.85), Medicaid/Medicare insurance (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.90), lower income level (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.87), and treatment at a community center (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96). In an exploratory analysis, those patients who received NT had longer 5-year overall survival compared with those who did not (48.3% vs 46.0%; P < .001). ConclusionsRates of NT are relatively low for patients with clinical stage II/III NSCLC treated prior to recent chemoimmunotherapy trials. Socioeconomic barriers to the uptake of NT include race, insurance status, income, and area of residence. As NT becomes more widely offered, accessibility for vulnerable populations must be assured.

A phase II trial of intravesical chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine and bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for patients with BCG-exposed, high-grade, non-muscle–invasive bladder cancer.

TPS579 Background: The standard of care for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after exposure to induction only BCG or relapse &gt;12 months after “adequate” BCG is retreatment with BCG. However, ~50% of patients will relapse within 6 months. Thus, there is a critical need to develop novel combination therapies to improve BCG immunotherapy efficacy. Combination BCG with immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with a ~12-18% risk of serious treatment-related adverse events and BCG combined with Mitomycin C (MMC) has unacceptable urinary toxicity. Intravesical Gemcitabine (GEM) is a common treatment for NMIBC, is well tolerated, has better efficacy after BCG than MMC, and, based on preclinical data, may synergistically enhance the efficacy of BCG by augmenting the immune tumor microenvironment. We completed a prospective Phase I trial of chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine and BCG in BCG-relapsed/BCG-exposed NMIBC that was well-tolerated (no treatment related grade ≥3 adverse events) with promising early efficacy (95% [19/20] 6-month complete response rate). No dose limiting toxicities were seen. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 2000 mg gemcitabine and 50 mg TICE BCG. Methods: To address the need for more effective and less toxic bladder preserving treatment options by enhancing the effectiveness of BCG, we launched an investigator-initiated phase I/II trial of combination intravesical gemcitabine with BCG in patients with BCG-exposed NMIBC (NCT04179162). The Phase II portion is currently enrolling patients with BCG-exposed carcinoma in-situ (CIS ±Ta/T1) that recurred within 24 months of last BCG (BCG-exposed/BCG-relapsing NMIBC). Patients with BCG-unresponsive disease, contraindication to BCG, or prostatic/ureteral urothelial disease are excluded. Induction intravesical GEM (2000mg, twice weekly) is given weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10 and intravesical BCG (40mg, Tice strain, weekly) is given weeks 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9. Responders receive SWOG maintenance BCG. The primary endpoint is clinical complete response (CR) at 6 months (absence of high-grade disease on cystoscopy/TURBT and negative cytology) using a Simon’s optimal 2-stage design testing the null hypothesis of a true CR of 55% at 6 months (based on historical outcomes of BCG alone) against a 1-sided alternative. In the first stage, the study would stop if ≤ 9/15 patients had a CR. In the second stage, the null hypothesis will be rejected if ≥ 29 CRs are observed in 43 total patients (type I error rate 5% and power of 80% if the true CR rate is 75%). Phase I patients treated at the MTD (14/25) are included in Phase II. Secondary outcomes include recurrence-free, progression-free, and cystectomy-free survival. Correlative studies explore immune and molecular predictors of response and resistance to chemoimmunotherapy in tumor tissue, urine, and blood. Clinical trial information: NCT04179162 .

Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A large real-world experience.

477 Background: First-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUC) consists of platinum-based chemotherapy in most patients and PD1/L1 inhibitors in selected patients. Multiple combination chemo-immunotherapy trials failed to show a clear benefit over chemotherapy alone. We sought to use real-world data to evaluate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of first-line chemotherapy, immunotherapy or combination chemo-immunotherapy treatment for metastatic bladder cancer and examined differences in overall survival (OS). Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stage IV UCB diagnosed between 2014 and 2018, who were treated with first-line immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or combination treatment. We performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine factors associated with treatment receipt. An extension of inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) obtained from multinomial logistic regression was used to balance clinical and sociodemographic differences between treatment groups. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the association between treatment and OS. Results: A total of 4,169 patients were identified in the cohort; 3,255 (78.1%) were treated with chemotherapy, 601 (14.4%) with immunotherapy, and 313 (7.5%) with combination treatment. Multivariable analysis identified increasing age (RRR: 1.07, 95% CI, 1.06-1.08), comorbidity burden (Charlson-Deyo 2, RRR: 1.65, 95% CI, 1.21-2.24 and Charlson-Deyo 3, RRR: 2.11; 95% CI, 1.51-2.93), and treatment at an academic facility (RRR: 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.53) as independent predictors of receiving immunotherapy. Treatment at an academic facility (RRR: 1.29, 95% CI, 1.01-1.65) was associated with receipt of combination treatment. After IPTW, we found that combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.83), but not immunotherapy alone, was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy. These data are limited by inability to determine platinum eligibility, and residual confounding. Conclusions: Patients with older age and more comorbidities were more likely to receive immunotherapy than chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Modest real-world utilization of chemo-immunotherapy was observed to be higher in academic centers and was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy. The study is limited by retrospective design; prospective data are necessary to identify patients who may benefit from combination chemo-immunotherapy.

LBA17 Primary endpoint results of SYNERGY, a randomized phase II trial, first-line chemo-immunotherapy trial of durvalumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin with or without the anti-CD73 antibody oleclumab in patients with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Overexpression of the ectoenzyme CD73 is involved in the generation of immunosuppressive adenosine in the tumor microenvironment and is associated with poor prognosis in patients (pts) with TNBC. Blocking CD73 with oleclumab may enhance the antitumor response to the combination of an anti-PD-L1 with chemotherapy in TNBC.

Distinct biosignatures associate with survival after chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized, three-arm phase II study in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

4010 Background: Preclinical and small clinical studies of chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) point to a yet unrealized potential of clinically significant immune activation. In our phase II study of the CD40 agonist antibody sotigalimab (sotiga) and/or nivolumab (nivo) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (chemo), we observed promising improvements in overall survival (OS) in 105 patients with newly diagnosed mPDAC (NCT03214250); the primary endpoint of 1-year OS rate was 57.7% (p = 0.006) in the nivo/chemo arm, 48.1% (p = 0.062) in the sotiga/chemo arm and 41.3% (p = 0.233) in the nivo/sotiga/chemo arm (O’Hara, ASCO 2021) as compared to a historical control of 35%. Here, we report results of multi-omic translational analyses designed to identify signatures predictive of OS benefit. Methods: Longitudinal blood and tumor tissue samples were collected for immune and tumor biomarker analysis. Tumor samples underwent RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF). Peripheral blood was analyzed by mass cytometry time of flight (CyTOF), high parameter flow cytometry, and proteomics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to the data to identify biosignatures related to OS in each arm. Results: Comprehensive multi-omic, multi-parameter immune and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct pretreatment immune signatures predictive of longer OS specific to nivo/chemo or sotiga/chemo (Table, representative examples). Because patients in each arm received chemotherapy, these and other arm-unique biomarkers suggest a relationship to the immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy in this randomized study. There was evidence of immune exhaustion in the sotiga/nivo/chemo arm that may explain the lack of survival benefit. Conclusions: From in-depth translational and ML analyses of randomized phase II trial of first-line chemoimmunotherapy in mPDAC patients, we identified novel biomarkers that associated with OS distinctly in each arm. Clinical trials in first-line mPDAC exploiting these previously unappreciated biomarkers and aiming to enrich patients for response, are warranted to further advance chemoimmunotherapy in this disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03214250. [Table: see text]

Sotigalimab and/or nivolumab with chemotherapy in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer: clinical and immunologic analyses from the randomized phase 2 PRINCE trial

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has improved the treatment of certain solid tumors, but effective regimens remain elusive for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a randomized phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of nivolumab (nivo; anti-PD-1) and/or sotigalimab (sotiga; CD40 agonistic antibody) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (chemotherapy) in patients with first-line metastatic PDAC (NCT03214250). In 105 patients analyzed for efficacy, the primary endpoint of 1-year overall survival (OS) was met for nivo/chemo (57.7%, P = 0.006 compared to historical 1-year OS of 35%, n = 34) but was not met for sotiga/chemo (48.1%, P = 0.062, n = 36) or sotiga/nivo/chemo (41.3%, P = 0.223, n = 35). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response and safety. Treatment-related adverse event rates were similar across arms. Multi-omic circulating and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct immune signatures associated with survival for nivo/chemo and sotiga/chemo. Survival after nivo/chemo correlated with a less suppressive tumor microenvironment and higher numbers of activated, antigen-experienced circulating T cells at baseline. Survival after sotiga/chemo correlated with greater intratumoral CD4 T cell infiltration and circulating differentiated CD4 T cells and antigen-presenting cells. A patient subset benefitting from sotiga/nivo/chemo was not identified. Collectively, these analyses suggest potential treatment-specific correlates of efficacy and may enable biomarker-selected patient populations in subsequent PDAC chemoimmunotherapy trials.

Role of Thoracic Radiotherapy in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) in the Immunotherapy Era: A National Hospital-Based Registry Analysis

Immunotherapy has shaped the treatment for a number of metastatic cancer types. Based on IMPower 133 and CASPIAN results, chemoimmunotherapy has become standard of care for de-novo ES-SCLC, with increase in median survival of approximately 2-3 months compared to prior standard of care platinum-based doublet therapy with etoposide. However, neither of these trials allowed consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Prior to chemo-immunotherapy trials, addition of consolidative TRT to standard chemotherapy improved 2 years survival in patients with any response to chemotherapy. At present, there is no prospective data of role of TRT in ES-SCLC with chemoimmunotherapy. We undertook this study to examine any benefit of TRT in patients with ES-SCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy.We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with ES-SCLC between the ages of 18-90 years treated between 2012-2017 treated with combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy at the time of diagnosis, and with and without TRT. We excluded patients with unknown treatment status or follow-up time. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatment groups utilizing log-rank testing. An optimal-full propensity-score match was performed utilizing clinical and demographic covariates to reduce the impact of potential confounders of overall survival on the probability of receipt of TRT. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of overall survival.A total of 244 patients were identified meeting selection criteria, treated between 2012 and 2016. There were 63 patients that received TRT and 181 patients that did not. The median age was 65 (40-90) years. The median follow-up was 9.68 (range 0.7-48.3) months. After propensity score matching by age, gender, race, comorbidity score, and type of chemotherapy, there was a trend towards improved median survival from 9 to 11 months and 2 year OS at 18.1% with the addition of TRT vs 12.0% with chemoimmunotherapy alone (P = 0.067). On multivariable analysis only female gender was significantly associated with improved OS after adjustment for age, race, comorbidity score, gender, and receipt of TRT (HR = 0.67 (95% CI 0.51 - 0.89), P = 0.01).In patients with ES-SCLC, the addition of TRT to chemoimmunotherapy is associated with a trend towards improved median and 2 year OS on the order of magnitude of the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy as reported in recent trials, though this was not statistically significant in the context of a limited sample size from a non-randomized cohort. Data from prospective, randomized trials are needed to help identify which patients may benefit from TRT in the immunotherapy era.

Clinical Importance of DNA Methylation Signatures in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Patients Treated with Chemo-Immunotherapy

Even in the era of the targeted therapies, there remains clinical value in exploring the impact of disease characteristics in chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) trials, namely to identify features that contribute most to long-term outcomes, thereby pinpointing patients destined to benefit from these therapies. One such feature is the CLL DNA methylome, that recapitulates normal B cell maturation, with IGHV mutated (M-CLL) and unmutated CLL (U-CLL) retaining an imprint of the DNA methylation signature of memory (m-CLL) and naive B cells (n-CLL), respectively, with a third intermediate epigenetic subgroup (i-CLL) with borderline mutation status. The pyrosequencing analysis of 5 CpG sites can divide CLL into these three subgroups (Queiros 2015, Leukemia 29:598-605), each with different clinico-biological features.We classified 606 treatment-naïve patients randomized to one chemotherapy (LRF CLL4) and two CIT (ARCTIC and ADMIRE) trials, into the three epigenetic subgroups using pyrosequencing and confirmatory Infinium HumanMethylation450 analysis (n=60, 96% concordance between technologies). Associations between epigenetic and clinico-biological features, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified by linear regression, univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analysis.We identified n-, i- and m-CLL in 49.3% (n=299), 32.0% (n=195) and 18.5% (n=112) of our patients, respectively (Fig1I). Fewer m-CLL patients were identified in our study compared to published data, reflecting the progressive nature of our cohort, with 80% (n=245/305, P<0.001) of U-CLL cases exhibited the n-CLL signature (i-CLL: 17% and m-CLL: 3%). For M-CLL cases 9%, 50% and 41% exhibited the n-, i- and m-CLL epigenetic signature, respectively. Median IGHV mutation load differed between epigenetic subgroups (p<0.001), with n-, i- and m-CLL displaying 100%, 96.65% and 92.90% identity to germline, respectively. Significant associations were observed with IGHV family usage, such as an enrichment of n-CLL in IGHV1-69 cases (96%, p<0.001). 74% of stereotyped subset #2 cases were i-CLL (p<0.001). 68% (80/117, p<0.001) of cases with deletion of 11q, 77% (41/53, p<0.001) with trisomy 12 and 68% (38/56, p=0.035) with mutation and/or deletion of the TP53 gene were n-CLL. Cases with mutations in NOTCH1 (including the 3' UTR, p=0.01) and SF3B1 (p=0.02) were also enriched in n-CLL.In 359 CLL4 patients, m-CLL was more prevalent in patients with a good response to therapy (55%, CR) compared to poor responders (22%, NR/PD). All four deaths from Richters transformation were n-CLL. Ten year OS differed according to epigenetic signature (P<0.001) and was reached by only 14% of n-CLL patients. n-, i- and m-CLL patients exhibited a median PFS of 23, 34 and 35, and OS of 63, 66 and 106 months, respectively. n-CLL showed significantly shorter PFS than i-CLL (HR 0.64, p<0.001) and m-CLL (HR 0.52, p<0.001), and had the shortest OS, again compared to i-CLL (HR 0.73, p=0.01) and m-CLL (HR 0.33, p<0.001, Fig1IIa and b). Multivariate Cox proportional analysis, controlling for confounding variables (inc. clinical features, IGHVstatus, TP53, NOTCH1 and SF3B1) in 278 patients showed that m-CLL was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.46, p<0.01), but not PFS.In 247 patients randomized to ARCTIC and ADMIRE, the epigenetic signature was associated with MRD status (p=0.04), with 61% (38/62) of MRD negative patients showing m-CLL. Seventy eight percent (43/55) of m-CLL patients achieved a complete remission. In univariate analysis, the i- (HR:0.57, p=0.05) and m-CLL (HR:0.3, p=0.002) subgroups displayed longer PFS (Fig1Ic). In a multivariate model, including TP53 lesions and IGHV status (239 patients), the m-CLL subgroup retained independent prognostic significance (HR:0.25, p<0.001).In conclusion, we report the first analysis of the clinical utility of epigenetic subgroup signatures in patients entered into first-line chemotherapy and CIT trials. In doing so, we validate key associations between epigenetics and clinico-biological disease features. Importantly, we identify m-CLL as an independent marker of survival in both our LRF CLL4 and ARCTIC/ADMIRE cohorts, providing preliminary evidence that DNA methylation analysis may aid in the identification of patients destined to demonstrate durable remissions when treated with these agents. [Display omitted] DisclosuresSteele:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Pettitt:Napp: Research Funding; GSK/Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Hillmen:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Schuh:Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Strefford:Roche: Research Funding.

A phase III clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy for stage IB-IIIA completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients nadim-adjuvant: New adjuvant trial of chemotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy.

TPS8581 Background: The results of current studies are considered acceptable evidence to support the hypothesis of efficacy of the proposed combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy (CT-IO) in patients with NSCLC stages Ib-IIIA candidates for adjuvant treatment. Methods: This is an open-label, randomised, two-arm, phase III, multi-centre clinical trial. Primary objective and endpoint: The primary objective is disease free survival (DFS) defined time from randomization to the earliest event defined as disease recurrence, any new lung cancer (even in the opposite lung), or death from any cause at any known point in time Sample size: 210 patients NSCLC stages Ib-IIIA (Experimental Arm (Adjuvant Chemotherapy-Inmunotherapy + maintenance adjuvant Inmunotherapy): 105 patients, Control Arm (Adjuvant Chemotherapy): 105 patients Treatment Patients randomised to the experimental arm will receive Nivolumab 360mg + Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC5 for 4 cycles every 21 days (+/- 3 days) as adjuvant treatment followed by maintenance adjuvant treatment for 6 cycles with Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W (+/- 3 days). Patients randomized to the control arm will receive Paclitaxel 200mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC5 for 4 cycles every 21 days (+/- 3 days) followed by 2 observation visits. Total trial duration: 6.5 years, 3.5 years of recruitment, 1 year of adjuvant treatment or observation and 2 years of follow up. The start date was January 2021. The estimated primary completion date is June 2027. Clinical trial information: NCT04564157.