Triage Pain Score Research Articles

Orthopaedic Diagnoses in the Black Pediatric Population.

The Black pediatric population is one that has been historically underserved and continues to have unmet needs. Factors including lack of diversity in orthopaedic studies and in historical standards, such as bone age, may inadvertently lead to inferior care. There are certain conditions in this population for which the practicing orthopaedic surgeon should have a higher degree of suspicion, including slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Blount disease, and postaxial polydactyly. Systemic diseases with higher rates in this population have orthopaedic manifestations, including sickle cell disease, vitamin D deficiency, and obesity. Racial discrepancies in access to prenatal care can have orthopaedic consequences for babies, especially cerebral palsy and myelodysplasia. Racial discrepancy exists in evaluation for nonaccidental trauma. Increased awareness of these issues better prepares practitioners to provide equitable care.

The effects of acute pain on cognitive skills in emergency department patients

IntroductionEffective pain management results in improved patient satisfaction, reduced anxiety, and improved comfort. However, concern exists regarding the effects of pain medications on cognition and patient ability to consent for procedures, hospital admission, or to refuse recommended medical interventions. MethodsThis prospective, case-control study was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Eligible subjects included ED patients ages 18 and older with a triage pain score of 1 or higher, who received non-narcotic analgesic agents. Cognition was measured before and after non-narcotic pain medication using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). A control group consisted of 35 healthy volunteers who completed the DSST at baseline and one hour. ResultsAmong 46 subjects, the mean age was 33. The mean triage pain score was 7. Before medication, the average DSST score was 39.5. After medication, the average DSST score was 42.9. There was a significant within-subject average change in DSST score (pre-post) of 3.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.6, 5.2), p < 0.001. Among the control group, the mean baseline DSST score was 64.2 (SD 10.7). One hour later the mean DSST score had increased to 71.1 (SD 10.4). Overall, the mean within-subject change over time in DSST was 6.9 (SD 8.0) with 95% CI 4.2 to 9.7. There was not enough evidence to detect relationships between change in DSST scores and age, triage pain, triage HR, triage RR, change in pain scores, gender, ethnicity, mode of arrival nor insurance (all with p > 0.05). ConclusionsWe found significant variation in DSST scores among ED patients with pain. Treatment of pain with nonsedating analgesic agents was not associated with improved scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test among ED patients with acute painful conditions, compared to control subjects.

P041 Successful Reduction in Opioid Prescription for IBD Flare in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study and Quality Improvement Initiative.

Opioid use is associated with increased mortality, emergency department (ED) utilization, 30-day readmission rates and decreased quality-of-life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Opioid use in the ED for acute IBD presentations has not been well characterized in the literature. Safe, evidence-based, and effective pain management guidance for IBD flares is needed to promote opioid stewardship in the ED. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who presented to an academic tertiary center ED with IBD flares from June 2019 through December 2019. Demographic and disease specific information and ED course, including analgesic use and numeric rating pain scores at ED presentation and discharge, were collected from the medical record. We designed and implemented a multimodal quality improvement intervention consisting of an evidenced-based IBD pain guideline, customized electronic health record order-set, Gastroenterology (GI) consult note smart-phrase and clinician education to promote opioid stewardship. The impact of our intervention was measured with a repeat retrospective analysis from December 2020 through April 2021. Run charts were generated to correlate the timing of interventions to changes in opioid exposure and prescription. Seventy-one patients were included in the pre-intervention cohort. A total of 78% of patients who presented to the ED with IBD flare were prescribed opioid(s) with an average of 29.3 morphine milligram equivalence (MME) per ED stay. Approximately half (49%) of patients did not receive any non-opioid analgesic and 13% patients received an opioid prescription at ED or hospital discharge. In the post-intervention cohort consisting of 49 patients, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients receiving opioids (45% vs. 78%; p < 0.001) and a significant reduction in the average total opioid administration (10.8 vs. 22.6 MME; p < 0.001). For each month during the post-intervention period, the proportion of patients who received an opioid in the ED and the average total opioid administered remained less than the median of the entire study period, which represents a nonrandom pattern. The use of a non-opioid analgesic, IV acetaminophen, was significantly increased (27% vs 3%; p < 0.001) and the risk of new or recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding was negligible in both cohorts (0% vs. 1%; p = 1.0). There was no significant difference between the average pain score (4.9 vs. 5.4 [10-point-scale]; p=0.440) and the difference between reported triage and final ED pain scores (-1.8 vs. -2.0; p=0.729). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in GI consultation (35% vs. 58%; p <0.016) and a non-significant reduction in hospital admission (63% vs. 80%; p=0.058). Almost 80% of patients who present to ED with IBD flare are prescribed opioids, while only half of patients receive non-opioid analgesics. Also concerning was the high rate of opioid prescription at ED or hospital discharge. A multimodal intervention successfully reduced the proportion and amount of opioid prescribing in the ED without compromising pain control or increasing the risk of GI bleeding. This was also associated with a significant increase in a non-opioid analgesic administration and a significant decrease in GI service consultation. These findings support the role of implementing an evidence-based IBD pain management guideline with electronic prescribing support and education in the ED setting for acute IBD flares. Additional research is needed to determine long-term benefits of reduced opioid exposure in this population.

The Utility of Pain Scale to Assess Verifiable vs Non-Verifiable Pain in United States Emergency Departments.

IntroductionWe sought to examine the utility of self-reported pain scale by comparing emergency department (ED) triage pain scores of self-reported but non-verifiable painful conditions with those of verifiable painful conditions using a large, nationally representative sample.MethodsWe analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) 2015. Verifiable painful conditions were identified based on the final diagnoses in the five included International Classification of Diseases 9th revision codes. Non-verifiable painful conditions were identified by the five main reasons for visit. Only adults 18 years of age or older were included. The primary outcome variable was the pain scale from 0 to 10 at triage. We performed descriptive and multivariate analyses to investigate the relationships between the pain scale and whether the painful condition was verifiable, controlling for patient characteristics.ResultsThere were 55 million pain-related adult ED visits in 2015. The average pain scale was 6.49. For verifiable painful diagnoses, which were about 24% of the total visits, the average was 6.27, statistically significantly lower than that for non-verifiable painful conditions, 6.56. Even after controlling for the confounding of patient characteristics and comorbidities, verifiable painful diagnoses still presented less pain than those with non-verifiable painful complaints. Older age, female gender, and urban residents had significantly higher pain scores than their respective counterparts, controlling for other confounding factors. Psychiatric disorders were independently associated with higher pain scores by about a half point.ConclusionSelf-reported pain scales obtained at ED triage likely have a larger psychological component than a physiological one. Close attention to clinical appropriateness and overall patient comfort are more likely to lead to better health outcomes and patient experiences than focusing on self-reported pain alone.

Discordance between patient-reported and actual emergency department pain management.

To determine patient knowledge of the nature of their pain management in the ED. This was a planned sub-study of data collected during a randomised, controlled trial of the nature of the informed consent process in a single ED. Patients aged ≥18 years, with a triage pain score of ≥4, were enrolled. Forty-eight hours post-ED discharge, patients were asked if they had declined analgesia or if a range of pain management options had been administered. The primary outcome was discordance between the patient report and the ED report (proportion of cases where these reports differed). Outcome data were collected on 655 patients. There was significant discordance for all variables examined (P < 0.001). Discordance for patients declining analgesia was lowest at 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-11.4). Discordance for administration of pain management 'other' than analgesia was highest at 32.6% (95% CI 29.0-36.4). Discordance for the administration of oral analgesia or 'any' analgesia was 17.1% (95% CI 14.3-20.3) and 14.4% (95% CI 11.8-17.3), respectively. For both of these outcomes, patients with chest pain and lower triage pain scores were more likely to report discordant responses. With the exception of 'other' pain management, smaller proportions of patients incorrectly reported not receiving management than incorrectly reporting that they did receive it. Patients are often unaware of the nature of their pain management. They are most often unaware of management other than analgesia. Patients with chest pain and lower triage pain scores had the least knowledge of their pain management.

The Effect of the Consent Process on Patient Satisfaction With Pain Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial

We aim to determine whether the timing and context of informed consent affects the subjective outcome of patient satisfaction with pain management. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in a single emergency department (ED). Patients aged 18 years or older with a triage pain score of greater than or equal to 4 provided consent to participate in a pain management study. They were randomized to consent in the ED or at follow-up. All patients were followed up at 48 hours post-ED discharge. Patients who consented at follow-up were unaware of the study until cold called. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with pain management. Secondary analyses examined effects on follow-up and participation rates. Variables associated with patients' being very satisfied were determined with multivariate logistic regression. Outcome data were obtained on 655 of 825 patients enrolled (79.4%). Patients who provided consent at follow-up were less likely to be very satisfied compared with those who consented in the ED (difference in proportions 11.5%; 95% confidence interval 3.5 to 19.4). Follow-up and participation rates did not differ between the groups. Patients who received pain advice and adequate analgesia (both as defined in this study) were more likely to be very satisfied (odds ratio 5.18, 95% confidence interval 2.82 to 9.52; and odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.22, respectively). The timing and context of informed consent significantly affect the subjective outcome of patient satisfaction, and this should be considered during study design. Clinicians should strive to provide pain advice and adequate analgesia to maximize their patients' satisfaction.

Variables Associated With Administration of Nurse-initiated Analgesia in Pediatric Triage.

Triage nurse-initiated analgesia (TNIA) has been shown to be associated with decreased time to the provision of analgesia and improved patient satisfaction. We examined variables that influence the provision of analgesia in a pediatric emergency department that uses TNIA. A 4-year retrospective cohort study of all children with triage pain scores ≥1 was conducted. Data on demographics and patients' and nurses' characteristics were collected. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the effect of multiple variables on the provision of any analgesia and opioid analgesia. Overall, 28,746 children had triage pain scores ≥1; 14,443 (50.2%) patients received analgesia of any type and 1888 (6.6%) received opioid analgesia. Mean time to any analgesia was 8.0±3.7 minutes. Of the 9415 patients with severe pain, 1857 (19.7%) received opioid analgesia. Age, sex, hourly number of patients waiting to be triaged, and nurse experience were not associated with the provision of any analgesia or opioid analgesia. Severe pain had the highest odds ratios (ORs) for the provision of any analgesia and opioid analgesia (7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-8.2 and 22.8; 95% CI: 18.1-28.8, respectively). Traumatic injury and time-to-triage <8 minutes were associated with the provision of opioid analgesia (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 4.2-5.2 and OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.5-1.8, respectively). TNIA yielded a short time to analgesia, but rates of any analgesia and opioid analgesia were low. Several variables associated with the provision of any analgesia and opioid analgesia were identified. Our findings provide evidence to guide future educational programs in this area.

Children Listening to Music or Watching Cartoons During ER Procedures: A RCT.

This study aims to determine if listening to music and watching cartoons are effective to distract children from pain and distress during procedures in the emergency room (ER). This study is a single-center, 3-armed, superiority randomized controlled trial comparing listening to music, watching cartoons, and standard care during ER procedures in children aged 3-13 years. The primary outcome was pain measured from video footage with the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score (AHTPS). Children older than 4 years self-reported pain with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). The secondary outcome was distress measured with the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-revised (OSBD-r). Another indicator of distress was heart rate. Data of 191 participants were analyzed for the 3 groups: music (n = 75), cartoon (n = 62), and control (n = 54). The median age was 7.3 years (4.9-9.7). In multivariable analysis, pain assessed with the AHTPS was significantly lower (B = -1.173, 95% confidence interval -1.953, -0.394, p = .003) in the music group than in the control groups. Across the 3 groups, 108 children self-reported pain with the FPS-R after the procedure. The scores were lowest in the music group, but the differences between groups were not significant (p = .077). OSBD-r distress scores assigned during the procedures were not significantly different between the 3 groups (p = .55). Heart rate directly after the procedure was not statistically significantly different between the 3 groups (p = .83). Listening to recorded music is a beneficial distraction for children experiencing pain during ER procedures, whereas watching cartoons did not seem to reduce pain or distress.

Intramuscular versus oral diclofenac for acute pain in adults with acute musculoskeletal injuries presenting to the ED setting: a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveThe current study aimed to ascertain differences in early postmedication pain reduction in participants presenting with acute musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) to the ED receiving intramuscular (IM) versus per oral (PO)...

P149: Benign headache management in Alberta emergency departments: a chart review study to explore gaps in practice

Introduction: Variation in medication management and image ordering for HA presentation to emergency departments (ED) has been documented. This study examined benign HA (i.e., migraine, cluster, tension) management in order to identify the consistency and appropriateness of HA management in EDs in Alberta. Methods: Patients were identified by primary discharge diagnosis in the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System using ICD-10-CA codes for benign HA (G43, G44, R51). Patients presenting to study sites from January 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017 were eligible for inclusion, provided they were adults (≥18 years), were not transferred from another institution or directly admitted to a service, and had an active HA at presentation. One hundred eligible patients were randomly selected for chart review. Data were extracted on standardized forms. Preliminary data on 50 patients (n = 150) from three Edmonton study sites is presented. Results: Most patients arrived to the ED via personal transportation (93%) and were assigned a Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) score of 3 (71%). The majority of patients were female (75%); mean age was 45 years (standard deviation: 18). Triage pain score was not documented for 21%. When documented, pain scores were most frequently between 4 and 7 (49%). Nearly 10% of patients left without being seen. For those who were assessed, physicians most frequently used ketorolac and metoclopramide as first or second line treatments or as a combination treatment. Consults were infrequent (14%). Nearly half of the patients (47%). had computed tomography (CT) in the ED. Pain re-assessment was completed for 69% of patients. Most patients were discharged from the ED (88%) and given some form of discharge instruction (78%). The most common instructions were to return to ED as needed (45%) and follow-up with their primary care physician (28%). Across all patients, 13% returned to the ED with headache within 30 days. Conclusion: Physicians treat patients with benign headaches appropriately and hospitalization is infrequent; however, one in eight patients relapse. Missing pain scale documentation reveals a potential problem for ED clinicians in assessing management effectiveness and ensuring patients leave the ED following pain relief. Half of the patients received a CT scan, highlighting the urgent need for an intervention to address CT overuse for patients with benign HA within this geographic region.

Normal saline bolus use in pediatric emergency departments is associated with poorer pain control in children with sickle cell anemia and vaso-occlusive pain.

Vaso-occlusive pain events (VOE) are the leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits in sickle cell anemia (SCA). This study assessed the variability in use of intravenous fluids (IVFs), and the association of normal saline bolus (NSB), on pain and other clinical outcomes in children with SCA, presenting to pediatric emergency departments (PED) with VOE. Four-hundred charts of children age 3-21 years with SCA/VOE receiving parenteral opioids at 20 high-volume PEDs were evaluated in a retrospective study. Data on type and amount of IVFs used were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received NSB and those who did not. The association of NSB use on change in pain scores and admission rates was evaluated. Among 400 children studied, 261 (65%) received a NSB. Mean age was 13.8 ± 4.9 years; 46% were male; 92% had hemoglobin-SS. The IVFs (bolus and/or maintenance) were used in 84% of patients. Eight different types of IVFs were utilized and IVF volume administered varied widely. Mean triage pain scores were similar between groups, but improvement in pain scores from presentation-to-ED-disposition was smaller in the NSB group (2.2 vs 3.0, P = .03), while admission rates were higher (71% vs 59%, P = .01). Use of NSB remained associated with poorer final pain scores and worse change in pain scores in our multivariable model. In conclusion, wide variations in practice utilizing IVFs are common. NSB is given to >50% of children with SCA/VOE, but is associated with poorer pain control; a controlled prospective trial is needed to determine causality.

Analgesia in the emergency department: why is it not administered?

ObjectivePain management in the ED is often suboptimal, with many patients not receiving analgesia. We aimed to determine why some patients refuse it, why others do not receive it, and...

Effects of opioid medications on cognitive skills among Emergency Department patients

IntroductionTreatment for pain and related conditions has been identified as the most common reason for Emergency Department (ED) visits. Concerns exist regarding the effects of opioid pain medications on cognition and patient ability to consent for procedures, hospital admission, or to refuse recommended medical interventions. This study was undertaken to identify cognitive skills before and after opioid pain medication in the ED setting. MethodsThis was a prospective study comparing performance on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) before and after administration of opioid pain medications. Eligible participants included ED patients with pain, who received opioid treatment. Participants were randomized to receive either the MMSE before pain medication and the MoCA after medication, or the reverse. MoCA scores were converted to MMSE equivalent scores for comparison. ResultsAmong 65 participants, the median age was 36 and median triage pain score was 8. 35% of patients were considered cognitively impaired based on their MMSE score prior to any opioid medication (MMSE<27). There was a median decrease in pain scores of 1 point following pain medication, p-value<0.001. There was a median decrease in MMSE scores of 1 point following pain medication, p-value=0.003. The range of change in scores (post minus pre) on the MMSE-equivalent was −7 to 3. 35 patients (56%) had a decrease in scores, 6 (10%) had no change, and 21 (34%) had an increase. After medication, 31 (48%) were abnormal (MMSE score<27). No differences in MMSE scores were identified by gender, ethnicity, mode of arrival, insurance, age, triage pain scores, opioid agent given, or ED diagnosis. ConclusionsThere is an association between opioid pain medication and decrease in cognitive performance on the MMSE. Because of the wide range of cognitive performance following opioid pain medication, assessment of individual patients' cognitive function is indicated.

Improving Quality of Care for Sickle Cell Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with delays in treatment of sickle pain crisis in the pediatric emergency department with the goal of discerning whether earlier pain management is correlated with better clinical outcome. This retrospective study examined data collected from clinical records of patients, aged 21 years or younger, who was treated for sickle cell pain crisis between January and June 2012. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from electronic records, as well as time of registration, triage, initial pain assessment, analgesic administration, and pain reassessment. A total of 160 sickle cell pain crises visits by 67 unique patients were identified. Opiates were the most common initial pain medication prescribed and administered. The mean time to initial analgesic administration and pain reassessment was 89 and 60 minutes, respectively. Patients with orders for imaging studies experienced significant delays in time to initial analgesic medication and pain reassessment. In addition, higher triage pain score correlated with shorter time to first dose of pain medication. However, age, sex, and final disposition did not affect time to administration of analgesic medications.Earlier pain management resulted in shorter ED length of stay for all patients regardless of disposition. However, earlier pain management did not affect the total length of hospitalization for patients admitted to the inpatient services. Pediatric patients with sickle cell pain crises experienced significant delays to initial analgesic medication. A standardized approach to pain management may improve ED management of SCD crises.

Variables associated with parent satisfaction with their child's pain management.

The provision of 'adequate analgesia' (which reduces the pain score by ≥2 and to <4 [0-10 scale]) is significantly associated with high levels of satisfaction with pain management among adult patients. We aimed to determine the variables (including 'adequate analgesia') associated with parent satisfaction with their child's pain management. We undertook an observational, pilot study in a mixed, metropolitan ED. Patients aged 4-16 years with a triage pain score of ≥4 were enrolled. Data included demographics, presenting complaint, pain scores every 30 min, analgesia administered, time to first analgesia, provision of nurse-initiated analgesia (NIA), and 'adequate analgesia', and parent satisfaction 48-h post-discharge (6 point scale: very unsatisfied - very satisfied). Complete data were collected on 185 patients: mean (SD) age 10.4 (3.6) years, weight 41.9 (17.8) kg; 93 (50.3%) were male. One hundred and ten (59.4%) parents were very satisfied with their child's pain management. Children of very satisfied parents had shorter times to analgesia than those who did not (median [interquartile range] 14 (33) vs 33 (46) min, respectively, P = 0.003). Parents whose children received NIA or 'adequate analgesia' were more often very satisfied than those whose children did not. However, the differences were not significant (difference in proportions: 13.2% [95% CI -1.9, 28.3], P = 0.07 and 10.2% [95% CI -5.02, 25.34], P = 0.16, respectively). Short times to analgesia are associated with parent satisfaction. There were non-significant trends towards high levels of satisfaction following the provision of NIA and 'adequate analgesia'. These findings will inform a well-powered study to confirm this association.

Derivation and preliminary validation of a risk score to predict 30-day ED revisits for sickle cell pain

BackgroundEmergency department (ED) revisits and 30-day readmissions have been proposed as markers for quality of ED care for sickle cell disease (SCD). ObjectiveTo create a scoring system that quantifies the risk of 30-day revisit after ED discharge for SCD vaso-occlusive pain MethodsThis was a dual-center retrospective derivation and validation cohort study. The derivation was performed at an academic, tertiary care center and the validation at an urban community hospital. The primary outcome was revisit to the ED within 30 days after an ED discharge for SCD pain. Recursive partitioning was used to derive a scoring system to predict 30-day revisits. ResultsOf a total of 1456 ED visits for SCD pain, there were 680 ED discharges (admission rate of 53%) in 193 unique individuals included in the derivation cohort. There were 240 (35.3%) 30-day revisits. Of a total of 126 ED visits for SCD, there were 79 ED discharges in 41 unique individuals in the validation cohort. The final risk score included 4 variables: (1) age, (2) insurance status, (3) triage pain score, and (4) amount of opioids administered during the ED visit. Possible scores range from 0 to 6. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.746 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.78—derivation cohort) and 0.753 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.86—validation cohort). A cutoff of 4 or greater identified 60% of 30-day ED revisits in the derivation cohort and 80% of revisits in the validation cohort. ConclusionsA risk score can identify ED visits for SCD pain with high risk of 30-day revisit.

370 Acute Management of Pain from the Emergency Department: Initial Report of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Registry

370 Acute Management of Pain from the Emergency Department: Initial Report of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Registry

Current management of migraine in US emergency departments: an analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Published data from 1998 revealed that most patients treated for migraine in an emergency department received opioids. Over the intervening years, a large body of evidence has emerged demonstrating the efficacy and safety of non-opioid alternatives. Expert opinion during these years has cautioned against use of opioids for migraine. Our objectives were to compare current frequency of use of various medications for acute migraine in US emergency departments with use of these same medications in 1998 and to identify factors independently associated with opioid use. We analyzed National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2010, the most current dataset available. The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey is a public dataset collected and distributed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It is a multi-stage probability sample from randomly selected emergency departments across the country, designed to be representative of all US emergency department visits. We included in our analysis all patients with the ICD9 emergency department discharge diagnosis of migraine. We tabulated frequency of use of specific medications in 2010 and compared these results with the 1998 data. Using a logistic regression model, into which all of the following variables were entered, we explored the independent association between any opioid use in 2010 and sex, age, race/ethnicity, geographic region, type of hospital, triage pain score and history of emergency department use within the previous 12 months. In 2010, there were 1.2 (95% confidence interval 0.9, 1.4) million migraine visits to US emergency departments. Including opioid-containing oral analgesic combinations, opioids were administered in 59% of visits (95% confidence interval 51, 67). The most commonly used parenteral agent, hydromorphone, was used in 25% (95% confidence interval 19, 33) of visits in 2010 versus less than 1% (95% confidence interval 0, 3) in 1998. Conversely, use of meperidine had decreased markedly over the same timeframe. In 2010, it was used in just 7% (95% confidence interval 4, 12) of visits compared to 37% (95% confidence interval 29, 45) in 1998. Metoclopramide, the most commonly used anti-dopaminergic, was administered in 17% (95% confidence interval 12, 23) of visits in 2010 and 3% (95% confidence interval 1, 6) of visits in 1998. Use of any triptan was relatively uncommon in 2010 (7% (95% confidence interval 4, 11) of visits) and in 1998 (10% (95% confidence interval 6, 15) of visits). Of the predictor variables listed above, only emergency department use within the previous 12 months was associated with opioid administration (adjusted odds ratio: 2.87 (95% confidence interval 1.03, 7.97)). In spite of recommendations to the contrary, opioids are still used in more than half of all emergency department visits for migraine. Though use of meperidine has decreased markedly between 1998 and 2010, it has largely been replaced by hydromorphone. Opioid use in migraine visits is independently associated with prior visits to the same emergency department in the previous 12 months.

Pain scores among ED patients: correlation with desire for pain medication

Introduction: Pain has been identified as the most common reason for Emergency Department (ED) visits. The verbal numeric rating pain scale (VNRS) is commonly used to assess pain in the ED. This study was undertaken to determine whether VNRS pain scores correlate with desire for pain medication among ED patients. Methods: In this prospective survey study, eligible patients included Emergency Department patients over 18 with painful conditions. The primary outcome measures included self-reported VNRS, ED diagnosis, number of ED visits and number of ED admissions within the past year, and the self-reported desire for pain medication. Results: Among 482 participants in 2012, the median triage pain score was 8 (IQR 6-10); the most frequently occurring score was 10. Overall, there were significant differences in pain scores with patient desire for analgesics. 67% reported desire for pain medications. Patients who did not want pain medications had significantly lower pain scores (median 6; IQR 4-8) compared to those who wanted medication (median 8; IQR 7-10) (p&lt;0.001) and compared to those who were ambivalent about medication (median 7; IQR 6-10) (p=0.01). There was no association between desire for pain medication and demographics including age, gender, race, or insurance status. Conclusions: ED patients who did not desire pain medication had significantly lower pain scores than patients who desired pain medication. Pain scores usually effectively predicted which patients desired pain medications. Desire for pain medication was not associated with age, gender, race, or insurance status.

Nurse‐initiated analgesia pathway for paediatric patients in the emergency department: A clinical intervention trial

The study aims to evaluate the impact of a nurse-initiated analgesia pathway (NIAP) intervention for paediatric patients in the ED. We undertook a pre- and post-intervention trial in a large, tertiary referral, mixed ED. The intervention comprised development and implementation of a comprehensive NIA Standing Order. In addition to paracetamol, which nurses could initiate pre-intervention, they were authorised to administer ibuprofen, paracetamol/codeine combinations and topical local anaesthetics prior to a doctor assessing the patient. All nurses were trained and credentialed prior to administering the NIAP. Patients aged 5-17 years with a triage pain score of ≥4 (Wong-Baker or numerical rating scale) were eligible for enrolment. The primary outcome was time to analgesia. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who received 'adequate analgesia' and parental satisfaction with ED pain management (measured 48 h post-discharge). Fifty-one children were enrolled in both the pre- and post-intervention periods. Patient sex and mean age, weight and triage pain score did not differ between the groups (P > 0.05). At post-intervention, significantly more patients received nurse-initiated analgesia (3.0% vs 43.9%; P < 0.001) and the median time to analgesia was significantly reduced (58 min vs 23 min; P < 0.01). Also, significantly more patients received 'adequate analgesia' post-intervention (41.2% vs 72.5%; P < 0.001). At follow up, the proportion of parents who were very satisfied with their child's overall pain management trended upwards in the post-intervention period (47.1% vs 66.7%; P = 0.07). No adverse events were observed during either period. The NIAP significantly reduced time to analgesia. It was associated with high levels of parental satisfaction.