Trends In Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

Disparity Reduction in United States Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis From 2005-2017 Using 3 Nationwide Data Sets.

Following passage of the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA), a steady rise in breast reconstruction rates was reported; however, a recent update is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate longitudinal trends in breast reconstruction (BR) rates in the U.S. and relevant sociodemographic factors. Mastectomy cases with/without BR from 2005 through 2017 were abstracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, and National Cancer Database (NCDB). BR rates were examined using Poisson regression. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of NCDB data was used to identify predictors of reconstruction. Race and insurance distributions were evaluated over time. Of 1,554,381 mastectomy patients, 507,631 (32.7%) received BR. Annual reconstruction rates per 1000 mastectomies increased from 2005 to 2012 (NSQIP: Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.077; SEER: 1.090; NCDB: 1.092) and stabilized from 2013 to 2017. NCDB data showed that patients who were younger (≤59 years), privately insured, had fewer comorbidities, and underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were more likely to undergo BR (all p<0.001). Over time, the increase in BR rates was higher among Black (252.3%) and Asian (366.4%) patients than White patients (137.3%). BR rates increased more among Medicaid (418.6%) and Medicare (302.8%) patients than privately insured (125.3%) patients. This analysis demonstrates stabilization in immediate BR rates over the last decade; reasons behind this stabilization are likely multifactorial. Disparities based on race and insurance type have decreased, with a more equitable distribution of BR rates.

Update and Trends in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy

Due to refinements in operating techniques, autologous breast reconstruction has become part of standard care. It has become more difficult to advise patients due to the expansion of oncologic options for mastectomy, radiation therapy and the variety of reconstructive techniques. The goal of reconstruction is to achieve oncologically clear margins and a long-term aesthetically satisfactory result with a high quality of life. Immediate reconstruction preserves the skin of the breast and its natural form and prevents the psychological trauma associated with mastectomy. However, secondary reconstructions often have a higher satisfaction, since here no restitutio ad integrum is assumed. Alloplastic, i. e., implant-based, breast reconstruction and autologous breast reconstruction are complementary techniques. This article provides an overview of current options for breast reconstruction including patients' satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction. Although immediate reconstruction is still the preferred choice of most patients and surgeons, delayed reconstruction does not appear to compromise clinical or patient-reported outcomes. Recent refinements in surgical techniques and autologous breast reconstruction include stacked-flaps, as well as microsurgical nerve coaptation to restore sensitivity, which lead to improved outcomes and quality of life. Nowadays Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy, accompanied by improved implant quality, allows immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction as well as reemergence of the prepectoral implantation. The choice of breast reconstruction depends on the type of mastectomy, necessary radiation, individual risk factors, as well as the patient's habitus and wishes. Overall, recent developments in breast reconstruction led to an increase in patient satisfaction, quality of life and aesthetic outcome with oncological safety.

Correlating state-specific and national trends in breast reconstruction after Medicaid expansion: A decade-long update on the Affordable Care Act’s impact

While disparities in access to reconstruction persist, a comprehensive analysis comparing state-based outcomes and national patterns in breast reconstruction as a result of Medicaid expansion has never been examined. In this study, we investigated how breast reconstruction rates changed as a result of Medicaid expansion and compared these state-based findings to national counterparts. Patient data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project among states that chose to expand Medicaid were compared with those from states that did not expand. The difference-in-differences estimate of expansion to nonexpansion states was 7.05 (p=0.10) for implant-based reconstruction, -11.56 (p=0.01) for autologous reconstruction, and -7.08 (p=0.18) for overall reconstruction. Comparing rates of nonexpansion states to national trends yielded estimates of -0.06 (p=0.04), 0.06 (p=0.01), and 0.004 (p=0.90) for implant-based, autologous, and overall breast reconstruction, respectively. Similarly, comparing rates of expansion states to national trends yielded estimates of 0.02 (p=0.38), -0.05 (p=0.03), and -0.02 (p=0.44) for implant-based, autologous, and overall breast reconstruction, respectively. In this study on national health policy, Medicaid expansion was associated with a significant increase in autologous rates while state-specific trends alone did not appear to predict the national outcomes of sweeping legislative changes that were differentially applied among states.

134. Roadblocks to Reconstruction: A Deep Dive into Autologous Breast Reconstruction Trends in New York City

134. Roadblocks to Reconstruction: A Deep Dive into Autologous Breast Reconstruction Trends in New York City

Bibliometric analysis of global research on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer from 2011 to 2021.

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the world, and most patients require a mastectomy. Women who have undergone mastectomy often suffer from breast loss that seriously affects their daily life, and breast reconstruction is not only beneficial to patient's quick recovery after surgery, but also their mental health. So, in recent years, more and more female breast cancer patients are receiving breast reconstruction surgery. We aim to map hot trends in breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer and provide directions for future research. We screened all literature (2011-2021) on breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer from The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and analyzed research trends in this field using Vosviewer and CiteSpace. Based on the search results, a total of 3404 articles related to breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer were screened. The US (n=1371) is the country with the highest number of articles, followed by Italy (n=282) and the UK (n=277). Harvard University (n=183) was the institution with the highest number of publications, followed by the University of Texas (n=141) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n=136). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery is the most published journal in the field. Pusic AL is the most published author in the field, while Matros E is the most cited author on average. Cluster analysis showed that breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer is a hot topic of research by scholars, and more and more experts recommend breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients. This study comprehensively summarizes and analyzes global research trends in breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. In the past 10 years, there has been a significant increase in relevant high-quality publications in this field, and the field of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer has a promising future.

Breast Reconstruction Trends in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: Analysis of Practices among Plastic Surgeons in the United States.

A cross-sectional survey of members of the American Society of Plastic Surgery was performed. Practice/demographic information and breast reconstruction protocols were queried. Univariate descriptive statistics were calculated, and outcomes were compared across cohorts with χ2 and Fischer exact tests. Overall, 477 plastic surgeons averaging 16.3 years in practice were surveyed. With respect to types of reconstruction, all options were well represented, although nearly 60% preferred autologous reconstruction with prior radiation and 55% preferred tissue expansion followed by implant/autologous reconstruction in the setting of unknown postoperative radiation. There was little consensus on the optimal timing of reconstruction in the setting of possible postoperative radiation. Most respondents wait 4-6 or 7-12 months between the end of radiation and stage 2 implant-based or autologous reconstruction. Common concerns regarding the effect of radiation on reconstructive outcomes included mastectomy flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, capsular contracture, tissue fibrosis, and donor vessel complications. Despite considerable research, there is little consensus on the ideal type and timing of reconstruction in the setting of pre- and postoperative radiation. Understanding how the current body of knowledge is translated into clinical practice by different populations of surgeons allows us to forge a path forward toward more robust, evidence-based guidelines for patient care.

A national analysis of outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstruction trends from 2013 through 2019

Traditionally, patients with breast reconstruction (BR) were hospitalized at least one day postoperatively. However, new trends suggest that outpatient surgery is a viable and safe alternative. This study aims to assess trends among patients with breast cancer who underwent outpatient mastectomy alone, with immediate BR (IBR) or delayed BR (DBR). A retrospective analysis of the 2013-2019 ACS NSQIP® database was conducted. All women who underwent outpatient mastectomy were included in this study. The cohort was divided as follows: (1) mastectomy without BR, (2) IBR, and (3) DBR. A Cochran-Armitage test and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate linear trends over time within groups, and overall and pairwise comparisons between groups across the years, respectively. A total of 84,954 women were included in this study. Overall, 54.9%, 16.2%, and 28.9% underwent mastectomy without BR, IBR, and DBR, respectively. From the BR groups, the majority had implant placement. A significant difference in incidence trends between the three groups was evidenced over time (p<0.001). The greatest increase was evidenced in the IBR group and the lowest in the mastectomy without BR group. In this cohort of patients, a significant difference in linear trends was evidenced over time within and between the three groups. Our results suggest that outpatient IBR procedures are increasing in a greater proportion compared to other surgical approaches. Further studies are required to better characterize this population and comprehend the decision-making process toward a surgical procedure within each of the three groups.

Chances and challenges—analysis of trends in breast reconstruction

While breast reconstruction has become more and more important within the past decade, research focus areas as well as trends are in constant change. The publications from 2012 to 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. CiteSpace visualization analysis software was used to analyze the institutions, countries, regions, categories, and keywords on breast reconstruction research. A total of 3092 articles were selected. The number of articles published in the last 10 years showed an upward trend year by year. The journal "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery" had the largest number of publications and citations, representing the core journal. The USA had the largest number of publications and the most extensive cooperation with other countries. The research highlights mainly focused on the improvement of surgical techniques, enhancing postoperative recovery, and oncological safety. Over the past decade, research on breast reconstruction has developed steadily, and considerable achievements in the field of surgical techniques, postoperative recovery, and oncological safety were reached. Plastic surgeons should continue to strive for a higher level of evidence study designs, while also recognizing the importance of international and multiple-center cooperation.

Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Background:Individuals with genetic susceptibility to breast cancer may pursue bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and subsequent breast reconstruction. This study aimed to characterize immediate reconstructive trends following BPM.Methods:The ACS-NSQIP database (2010 -2019) was used to examine differences in demographics and operative outcomes based on breast reconstruction technique following BPM and factors predicting reconstruction type.Results:Of 1945 patients (mean age, 43.8 ± 11.3 years), implant-based reconstruction (IBR) was most frequently (71.8%) performed following BPM. Patients who underwent IBR (n = 1396) were younger (42.6 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be White (P < 0.05), and more likely to have a BMI less than 25 (P < 0.001). Patients who underwent autologous reconstruction (AR) (n = 186, 45.8 years) were more likely to be Black or African American and have a BMI of 25–30. Patients who underwent mastectomy only (MO) without immediate reconstruction (n = 363) were older (47.6 years), more likely to be Asian, and more likely to have a BMI greater than 35. The MO cohort had the highest frequency of diabetes or smoking history. AR was associated with longer operations, longer lengths of stay, and increased complications. Increasing age and BMI were predictive of AR or MO compared to IBR. Smoking was predictive of MO.Conclusion:This is the first large-scale study of genetically susceptible patients who underwent BPM demonstrating a significant relationship between patient demographics, operative outcomes, and immediate reconstruction technique. These results provide valuable insight for surgeons and patients during the shared decision-making process.

Current trends in breast reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction is nowadays a component of surgical treatment of breast cancer; therefore plastic surgeons are widely involved in breast reconstruction procedures either after mastectomy or after wide quadrantectomy. The aim is to reduce the distortion of breast shape and to improve the aesthetic outcome of the oncological procedure taking in account the symmetric appearance of the breasts. In post quadrantectomy reconstruction, breast reshaping with mammoplasty pattern could be applied in large and ptotic breast; otherwise flaps from lateral thoracic area could be used as well in post mastectomy reconstruction. In the case of mastectomy, the mastectomy procedure itself has become increasingly conservative, thus allowing an improvement in the aesthetic results of the reconstruction, especially if an implant is used. If adequate thickness of the mastectomy flap is preserved, the prosthesis can be placed in front of the muscle (prepectoral reconstruction), rather than behind the muscle (submuscular reconstruction). In prepectoral reconstruction the postoperative recovery is easier and less distressing for the patient and the postoperative appearance is more natural then in submuscular reconstruction. Autologous breast reconstruction implies the use of flaps (tissue taken from donor areas and used to reconstruct the breast area after appropriate molding), this technique allows to obtain a natural appearance of the breast with similar characteristics to the original one, and can be used in the radiated field. Different options of flaps include flaps from back area (local flaps) and flaps from distant areas (free flaps), basically from abdomen and inner tight.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction Trends in the United States: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.

Autologous tissue is the criterion standard in breast reconstruction, but traditionally has been used as a secondary option after implant-based options because of reduced reimbursement relative to effort and required additional technical skill. We intended to evaluate the overall frequency and trends of autologous breast reconstruction (ABR), the trends of ABR in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals and the trends of ABR in different hospital regions in the United States. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we examined the clinical data of patients who underwent immediate or delayed ABR from 2009 to 2016 in the United States. A total of 146,185 patients underwent ABR during this period. The overall rate of ABR increased 112%, from 26.6% to 56.5%. The majority of ABR were delayed reconstructions (62.3%), which increased gradually from 54.9% to 80% during the study period. The overall frequency of flaps included the deep inferior epigastric perforator (32.1%), latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (28.4%), free transvers rectus abdominus myocutaneous (15.9%), pedicled transvers rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap (14.5%), gluteal artery perforator (0.6%), superficial inferior epigastric artery (0.6%), and unspecified-ABR (7.2%). Most ABRs were performed in teaching hospitals (78.6%) versus nonteaching hospitals (21.4%). The teaching hospitals' ABR rate increased from 70.5% to 88.7%. The greatest proportion of ABRs were performed in the south (39.6%) followed by northeast (23.0%), midwest (18.9%), and west (18.5%). The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has become the predominant ABR method in the United States. In addition to more delayed reconstructions being performed in recent years, ABR rates are increasing overall and shifting from pedicled flaps to free flaps.

Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004).

ObjectiveMulti-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with breast cancer.MethodsA standardized questionnaire used to collect information on breast reconstruction among females diagnosed with breast cancer was distributed by 31 members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Information was collected on tumor characteristics, treatment, mesh application, nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation, postoperative complications, bilateral reconstruction, patient satisfaction and local recurrence. The overall rate of breast reconstruction was assessed, and the characteristics were compared across patient groups with different reconstruction approaches.ResultsA total of 1,554 patients underwent breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, with a reconstruction rate of 9.6%. Among them, 1,190 were implant-based, and 262 underwent autologous reconstructions, while 102 cases underwent a combination of both. Patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction were younger than those who received autologous reconstruction (40.1±4.6 vs. 45.0±5.9, P=0.004). Compared to patients with autologous reconstruction, mesh application (25.5% vs. 6.5%), NAC preservation (51.8% vs. 40.5%) and reconstruction failure (1.8% vs. 0) were more frequently reported among those with implant-based reconstruction. There was no significant difference in general satisfaction across three reconstruction approaches, though patients with autologous reconstruction reported the highest aesthetic satisfaction among the three groups (P=0.044). ConclusionsImplant-based breast reconstruction remains the dominant choice among patients, while autologous reconstruction was associated with higher aesthetic satisfaction. Our multi-center investigation based on the findings of the tertiary hospitals of Chinese Society of Breast Surgery may guide a future series of clinical studies on breast reconstruction in China.

Trends of Breast Reconstruction in Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND: In April 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released millions of billing records for over 880,000 healthcare providers in an effort to improve the transparency, accountability, and affordability of the US healthcare system. This study was performed to analyze the overall Medicare landscape with respect to surgeons, beneficiaries, services, and reimbursements in the setting of breast reconstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of publicly available Medicare utilization and payment data for surgeons who provided services to Medicare beneficiaries between January 2012 and December 2017. Breast reconstruction Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were queried using the Medicare Payment and Utilization Database. Statistical significance was computed using a one-way analysis of variance and Levene’s test was used to confirm the homogeneity of variances. RESULTS: Data included trends in the number of breast reconstructions over time and average Medicare reimbursements over time. In general, the number of breast reconstructions increased over the study period, with the greatest increase in free flap breast reconstruction (+55.5%) and the greatest decrease in TRAM reconstruction (−36.9%). On average, the Medicare payment amount per service was about 20% of the submitted charge. For example, reconstruction with latissimus flap charge in 2017 was $6,588 and payment amount was $1,358, resulting in a 79.4% reduction. Despite inflation and overall increases in healthcare costs, reimbursements in breast reconstruction have had little or no increase over time. The highest rate of change was Current Procedural Terminology 19366 (breast reconstruction with other technique), which increased from $957 in 2012 to $1,136 in 2017, for an +18% rate of change. Over the study interval, implant-based reconstruction increased around 12%, whereas latissimus and free flap reconstruction decreased around 2% over the same time interval. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies and quantifies wide variations in reimbursement for breast reconstruction procedures. Over the study period, reimbursement for implant-based reconstruction increased while autologous reconstruction decreased. Variations in reimbursement may preclude some surgeons from offering certain reconstructive options to a subset of patients. Addressing these potential care disparities in a growing patient population has major implications in quality of care for a large subset of women recovering from breast cancer. It is important for surgeons to understand these trends and to communicate with policy makers toward developing sustainable reimbursement models.

Revisiting the internal mammaries as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction: considerations in current practice.

The internal mammary artery (IMA) has supplanted the thoracodorsal artery as the primary recipient vessel in autologous breast reconstruction. Additionally, the IMA continues to be the preferred bypass graft choice in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, practice patterns in breast reconstruction have evolved considerably since the adoption of the IMA for this application. The authors sought to evaluate the safety of IMA harvest for breast reconstruction in our current practice, given the possibility that patients may require CABG in the future. The authors reviewed the prospective database of free flaps for breast reconstruction performed at their center from 2009 to 2017. Patients were divided into three groups (2009-2011, 2011-2013, 2014-2017) and compared on the basis of demographics, medical comorbidities, and laterality of reconstruction. Patients were further risk stratified for 10-year risk of cardiovascular events using the American College of Cardiology's atheroscletoric and cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator. There was a marked increase in the number of patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution over the past three years (2009-2011, n = 55; 2012-2014, n = 50; 2015-2017, n = 145). The distribution of unilateral versus bilateral flaps changed meaningfully; however, they did not change statistically significantly over the study period (2009-2011 = 32.7%, 2012-2014 = 28.0%, 2015-2017 = 49.0%, p = 0.12). The rise in bilateral reconstructions over the study period is commensurate with the observed significant rise in contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (2009-2011 = 25.5%, 2012-2014 = 20.0%, 2015-2017 = 42.1%, p = 0.022). The mean 10-year risk of major cardiovascular events in the entire sample was 6.3 ± 7.1% (median 4.0%). The maximum individual risk score exceeded 25% in all three groups. Given overall trends in breast reconstruction and the sometimes-elevated cardiac risk profiles of our patients, the authors recommend risk stratification of all patients using the proposed Breast Reconstruction Internal Mammary Assessment (BRIMA) scoring system and consideration of left internal mammary artery preservation in select cases.

Current status of and trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in Korea.

Since April 2015, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction has been covered by the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). The frequency of these procedures has increased very rapidly. We analyzed data obtained from the Big Data Hub of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) and determined annual changes in the number of breast reconstruction procedures and related trends in Korea. We evaluated the numbers of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures performed between April 2015 and December 2018 using data from the HIRA Big Data Hub. We determined annual changes in the numbers of total, autologous, and implant breast reconstructions after NHIS coverage commenced. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. The post-mastectomy breast reconstruction rate increased from 19.4% in 2015 to 53.4% in 2018. In 2015, implant reconstruction was performed in 1,366 cases and autologous reconstruction in 905 (60.1% and 39.8%, respectively); these figures increased to 3,703 and 1,570 (70.2% and 29.7%, respectively) in 2018. Free tissue transfer and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap creation were the most common autologous reconstruction procedures. For implant-based reconstructions, the rates of directto-implant and tissue-expander breast reconstructions (first stage) were similar in 2018. This study summarizes breast reconstruction trends in Korea after NHIS coverage was expanded in 2015. A significant increase over time in the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction rate was evident, with a trend toward implant-based reconstruction. Analysis of data from the HIRA Big Data Hub can be used to predict breast reconstruction trends and convey precise information to patients and physicians.

2020 special issue: Twenty years of breast reconstruction: Past, present, and future

Breast reconstruction has evolved in the last 25years to provide women with better autologous and implant-based options. The general trends of breast reconstruction have shifted to skin and nipple-areolar complex preservation, resulting in improved aesthetics and patient satisfaction. Autologous reconstruction has made a dramatic movement toward microsurgical reconstruction by free tissue transfer and has addressed lymphedema and breast sensation. Using the patient's own tissues, several aesthetic refinements have led to optimizing the cosmetic appearance of the reconstructed breast. Implant-based reconstruction has improved with the invention of form-stable silicone implants, acellular dermal matrix, and fat grafting. These positive trends will continue into the future. We hope that all women with a diagnosis of breast cancer will have the option of a consultation with a reconstructive plastic surgeon, ideally prior to undergoing resective surgery, to ensure they are aware of all reconstructive options to maximize their reconstructive result.

Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China: a cross-sectional study

Objective: To investigate the current trends of breast reconstruction(BR) after mastectomy in China. Methods: A list of hospitals with more than 200 cases of breast cancer surgery per year nationwide was obtained, and 110 institutions were selected according to the geographical distribution. The research was conducted in the form of a questionnaire survey, and 92.3% (169/183) of the questions were single-choice questions. Information such as demographics of surgeons and hospitals, number of mastectomy and BR, type and timing of BR was included in the survey. Survey formal notification letter was issued by the China Anti-Cancer Association Breast Cancer Committee and Chinese College of Surgeons, Committee of Mammary Surgeons. Questionnaires were sent to the respondents of each center by email. The survey time range was from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. All data were completely collected before September 7, 2018. Results: A total of 110 units participated in the survey. In total, 87.3% (96/110) of the hospitals have conducted BR surgery. The BR after mastectomy was 10.7% (6 534/61 099), among this, implant BR accounted for 65.7%(4 296/6 534), autologous BR accounted for 20.1% (1 312/6 534), and autologous combined implant BR accounted for 14.2% (927/6 534). Immediate reconstruction accounted for 67.6% (4 417/6 534) of BR, while delayed BR accounted for 32.4% (2 097/6 534). In 2017, 77.8% (35/45) of the plastic surgery departments cooperated with general surgery departments. General BR could be conducted after mastectomy accounted for 83.6% (92/110). The proportion of reconstruction was positively correlated with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (r=0.311, P=0.002). The one-step implant-based BR(IBBR) was the most preferred type in immediate BR. Two-step IBBR was the most preferred method in delayed BR. Hospitals that routinely evaluated aesthetics after BR accounted for 64.6% (62/96), while only 16.7% (16/96) of hospitals used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The most commonly used PROM tool was BREAST-Q. Conclusions: The overall BR in China is on upward trend, but gap between China and the developed countries still exists. Breast surgery departments should strengthen further cooperation with plastic surgery departments. Simultaneously, the aesthetics evaluation and PROM after BR should be put a high premium.

État des lieux de la reconstruction mammaire après cancer du sein sur l’Île de la Réunion en 2016

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to describe the current trends of breast reconstruction (BR) and breast oncoplasty (BO) for breast cancer patients in Reunion Island. MethodsThis is a multicenter retrospective descriptive study of all BR and BO surgeries in 2016. We studied the first stage of BR that corresponds to the choice of surgical technique. Patient's age, care center, technique and duration of surgery, complications and their risk factors were reviewed. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the modified BREAST-Q©. ResultsIn 2016, BR rate over total mastectomy was 47.6% and BO rate was 6.3% over partial mastectomy. Among the 92 patients included, 25 immediate BR were performed (84% in private institution) and 44 delayed BR (67% in public hospital). Although prosthetic techniques were the most used, satisfaction seems to be better with autologous techniques. ConclusionsThe ratio of BR is high in Reunion Island with a wide range of techniques but uneven practice. Conversely, BO's ratio is low and improvement is needed.

Trends in breast reconstruction: Implications for the National Health Insurance Service.

BackgroundBreast reconstruction has become more common as mastectomy has become more frequent. In Korea, the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) began covering breast reconstruction in April 2015. This study aimed to investigate trends in mastectomy and breast reconstruction over the past 10 years and to evaluate the impact of NHIS coverage on breast reconstruction.MethodsNationwide data regarding mastectomy and breast reconstruction were collected from the Korean Breast Cancer Society registry database. Multiple variables were analyzed in the records of patients who underwent breast reconstruction from January 2005 to March 2017 at a single institution.ResultsAt Seoul National University Hospital, the total number of reconstruction cases increased 13-fold from 2005 to 2016. The proportion of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) cases out of all cases of total mastectomy increased from 4% in 2005 to 52.0% in 2016. The proportion of delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) cases out of all cases of breast reconstruction and the overall number of DBR cases increased from 8.8% (20 cases) in 2012 to 18.3% (76 cases) in 2016. After NHIS coverage was initiated, the proportions of IBR and DBR showed statistically significant increases (P<0.05). Among the IBR cases, the percentage of prosthesis-based reconstructions increased significantly (P<0.05), but this trend was not found with DBR. Total mastectomy became significantly more common after the expansion of NHIS coverage (P<0.05).ConclusionsOver the last decade, there has been an increase in mastectomy and breast reconstruction, and the pace of increase accelerated after the expansion of NHIS coverage. It is expected that breast reconstruction will be a routine option for patients with breast cancer under the NHIS.

Trends in breast reconstruction practices in a specialized breast tertiary referral centre.

BackgroundBreast reconstruction is an important component of multidisciplinary breast cancer management. The practice of breast reconstruction after mastectomy has evolved significantly in the past decade as a result of both increasing mastectomy rates and advances in reconstructive strategy. These changes have significantly influenced the contemporary surgical management of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to examine trends in breast reconstruction after mastectomy in an Irish population.MethodsData were reviewed from a database of all patients who had mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction at Galway University Hospital, a tertiary breast cancer referral centre, between 2004 and 2014. Trends in breast reconstruction after mastectomy were explored with respect to patient demographics, clinicopathological features, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy.ResultsOf 1303 patients who underwent mastectomy during interval studied, 706 (54.2 per cent) had breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In 629 patients (89·1 per cent), breast reconstruction was performed in the immediate setting. Reconstruction rates increased over time from 20·5 per cent in 2004 to 44·7 per cent in 2014. Reconstruction was more commonly performed in younger patients and those with benign, in situ and early‐stage disease. A negative relationship between radiotherapy and reconstruction was observed. A pedicled flap with or without an implant was the most commonly used reconstructive approach in patients receiving radiotherapy.ConclusionBreast reconstruction after mastectomy has become the standard of care in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Recent trends show a transition favouring implant‐based approaches.