Tremor Rating Research Articles

Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation targeting the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor

To compare awake and asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Essential Tremor (ET), we conducted this retrospective cohort study of patients consecutively operated with DBS targeting the caudal Zona incerta (cZi). 37 underwent surgery awake and 55 asleep. Tremor before surgery and on/off stimulation one year after surgery were evaluated using the Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS). Procedural time, electrode localization, stimulation parameters and adverse events were noted and compared. ETRS scores were similar at baseline between the groups except for contralateral arm tremor, which was slightly worse in the awake group. Total ETRS, contralateral arm tremor and activities of daily living scores showed no significant difference between the groups on-stimulation at one-year follow-up. Compared to the awake group, the asleep group had shorter procedural time and lower stimulation parameters. There were no intracranial haemorrhages nor surgery site-infections. Both groups showed a good improvement of tremor at one-year follow-up. Image-guided DBS surgery targeting the cZi enables safe and efficient asleep surgery for ET.

Non-motor symptoms in patients with Spinocerebellar ataxia type 12.

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 12 (SCA12) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by abnormal CAG repeat expansion in the PPP2R2B gene. This disease is classically characterized by action tremor, dysarthria, ataxia, and hyperreflexia. There are limited reports regarding the non-motor symptoms in patients with SCA 12. We investigated the frequency and factors associated with the selected non-motor symptoms in patients with SCA 12. Genetically diagnosed (CAG repeats > 43) and symptomatic cases of SCA 12 were included in the study. Motor severity was assessed using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS). Non-motor symptoms such as depression, autonomic function, and cognition were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), respectively. The mean age of the cohort with 34 SCA12 patients was 64.87 years (standard deviation 6.844). In this study, 21 patients (61.76%) had either mild or moderate cognitive impairment, almost equally frequent in early and advanced cases. Similarly a number of patients demonstrated evidence of moderate and severe depression. The SARA score was strongly associated with the MoCA score, and CAG repeat length could independently predict the MoCA score in this cohort. Autonomic symptoms were commonly present, with the majority of the patients experiencing urinary symptoms. Non-motor symptoms are common in SCA12 patients, even in the early stages of the condition. Timely detection and treatment of these symptoms may improve the therapeutic outcome and quality of life for SCA12 patients. The diverse symptoms of SCA12 perhaps indicate a widespread neurodegeneration beyond the cerebellum or its direct connections.

Severe and unclassifiable tremor.

Patients often exhibit very severe or disabling forms of tremor that cannot be clearly characterized. To present a series of 37 cases of tremor considered unclassifiable. Patients diagnosed with essential tremor according to criteria of the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorder Society (IPDMDS), who had been previously studied, were included as controls. All patients underwent a battery of tests between 2019 and 2022, which enabled us to compare them. Relevant demographic and clinical information were collected. The following tools were applied: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); the Fahn-Tolosa-Marín Tremor Rating Scale (TRS); and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST). A simple brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed for all patients. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test and the t-test with Fisher correction if appropriate, and the quantitative variables were compared through the two-tailed Student t-test. Values of p ≤ 0.01 were considered statistically significant. The cases presented higher scores on the anxiety and depression subscales of the HADS than the controls (p ≤ 0.006 and 0.000 respectively). In all domains of the TRS, the cases scored significantly higher, as well as in the QUEST. History of enolism was higher among the controls, and history of orthostasis and rest tremor was higher among the cases (p ≤ 0.000). Cerebellar atrophy was present in every patient in the case group, and in 24 subjects in the control group. Dystonia was observed in 7 subjects in the case group, and in none of the patients in the control group. There are patients with unclassifiable and extremely disabling tremors who respond poorly to the pharmacological therapy options.

Is essential tremor a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome? A prospective study excluding the most common comorbid conditions

Aims: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity, resulting from compression of the median nerve. Tremor, a rhythmic and involuntary movement of any part of the body, is the most common movement disorder, affecting millions of people worldwide. There is limited research on the coexistence of CTS and ET (essential tremor). Methods: This prospective study included patients aged 18-65 who presented to the neurology outpatient clinic and were diagnosed with ET. Participants supplied informed consent, a sociodemographic form, and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (FTM TRS). Patients were evaluated for the presence and severity of CTS with electromyography (EMG). The EMG data were categorized as normal, mild, moderate, and severe CTS. Results: In the study, the average age of the 50 ET patients was 56.0 (35.0-64.0) years. The gender distribution comprised 22 (44.0%) males and 28 (56.0%) females. The following tremor locations were reported: 41 (82.0%) in both upper extremities, 3 (6.0%) in the right upper extremity, 2 (4.0%) in the left upper extremity, 1 (2.0%) in both upper extremities, head tremor, and voice, and 3 (6.0%) in both upper extremities and head tremor. A high prevalence of CTS was detected in ET patients (46%). Additionally, a positive correlation was found between CTS in ET patients, long disease duration, and female gender. No significant relationship was found between FTM TRS Part A, Part B, Part C, total scores, and median sensory and motor nerve amplitude and velocity values in ETS patients. Conclusion: CTS is more common in patients with ET. This suggests that ET may be a risk factor for CTS, independent of other factors. Early diagnosis and treatment of CTS in patients with ET is important to improve their quality of life.

An Algorithm for Automated Measurement of Kinetic Tremor Magnitude Using Digital Spiral Drawings

Introduction: Essential tremor is a common movement disorder. Numerous validated clinical rating scales exist to quantify essential tremor severity by employing rater-dependent visual observation but have limitations, including the need for trained human raters and the lack of precision and sensitivity compared to technology-based objective measures. Other continuous objective methods to quantify tremor amplitude have been developed, but frequently provide unitless measures (e.g., tremor power), limiting real-world interpretability. We propose a novel algorithm to measure kinetic tremor amplitude using digital spiral drawings, applying the V3 framework (sensor verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation) to establish reliability and clinical utility. Methods: Archimedes spiral drawings were recorded on a digitizing tablet from participants (n = 7) enrolled in a randomized placebo control double-blinded crossover pilot trial evaluating the efficacy of oral cannabinoids in reducing essential tremor. We developed an algorithm to calculate the mean and maximum tremor amplitude derived from the spiral tracings. We compared the digitally measured tremor amplitudes to manual measurement to evaluate sensor reliability, determined the test-retest reliability of the digital output across two short-interval repeated measures, and compared the digital measure to kinetic tremor severity graded using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) score for spiral drawings. Results: This algorithm for automated assessment of kinetic tremor amplitude from digital spiral tracings demonstrated a high correlation with manual spot measures of tremor amplitude, excellent test-retest reliability, and a high correlation with human ratings of the TETRAS score for spiral drawing severity when the tremor severity was rated “slight tremor” or worse. Discussion: This digital measure provides a simple and clinically relevant evaluation of kinetic tremor amplitude that shows promise as a potential future endpoint for use in clinical trials of essential tremor.

Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.

Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear. The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET). Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore. TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior. TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.

Rebound Tremor Frequency as a Potential Diagnostic Marker for Delayed Therapy Escape after Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor-Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study.

Delayed therapy escape (DTE) is frequent after thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor, leading to reduced quality of life, often with ataxic symptoms, and early recognition is challenging. Our goal was to examine whether a low-frequency rebound tremor of the left hand after switching off stimulation is useful as a diagnostic marker for DTE. In this cross-sectional study with additional retrospective analysis, we examined 31 patients with bilateral thalamic DBS ≥ 12 months for essential tremor, using quantitative assessments including video-based motion capture, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS), and scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA). If available, preoperative (preOP) and 12-month postoperative assessments were included in the analysis. Evaluations occurred with DBS activated (ON) and deactivated (OFF). A higher ratio FTMTRS nowON/preOP indicated DTE. Preoperative FTMTRS scores were available for 16 patients, including 5 patients with DTE. The receiver operating characteristic analysis found an area under the curve of 0.86 (p = 0.024) for identification of DTE by low-frequency rebound tremor (i.e., OFF) on the left. In conclusion, it could serve as a potential diagnostic marker.

Responsive Versus Continuous Deep Brain Stimulation for Speech in Essential Tremor: A Pilot Study.

Responsive deep brain stimulation (rDBS) uses physiological signals to deliver stimulation when needed. rDBS is hypothesized to reduce stimulation-induced speech effects associated with continuous DBS (cDBS) in patients with essential tremor (ET). To determine if rDBS reduces cDBS speech-related side effects while maintaining tremor suppression. Eight ET participants with thalamic DBS underwent unilateral rDBS. Both speech evaluations and tremor severity were assessed across three conditions (DBS OFF, cDBS ON, and rDBS ON). Speech was analyzed using intelligibility ratings. Tremor severity was scored using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS). During unilateral cDBS, participants experienced reduced speech intelligibility (P = 0.025) compared to DBS OFF. rDBS was not associated with a deterioration of intelligibility. Both rDBS (P = 0.026) and cDBS (P = 0.038) improved the contralateral TRS score compared to DBS OFF. rDBS maintained speech intelligibility without loss of tremor suppression. A larger prospective chronic study of rDBS in ET is justified. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Exploring serum α‑synuclein and its autoantibodies in essential tremor: implications for diagnosis and symptom correlations.

There is no definite biomarker for confirming the diagnosis of essential tremor (ET) or differentiating it from other diseases, particularly Parkinson's disease. The present study aimed to investigate the serum levels of the α-synuclein protein (α-syn) and its autoantibodies in patients with ET compared with healthy controls and its relation to motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with ET. Serum α-syn and its autoantibodies were measured in 32 patients with ET and 32 age- and sex-matched controls. Both groups were assessed using the non-motor symptoms scale, MoCA, Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire. Tremor was assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale. The serum α-syn concentration in patients with ET was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (P<0.001), with a positive predictive value of 0.81 and a negative predictive value of 0.75, while the serum anti-a-syn autoantibody concentration was not significantly different between the two groups. There were no correlations between serum α-syn or its autoantibodies and patients' clinical characteristics. Furthermore, patients with ET had worse cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, non-motor symptoms and quality of life. The serum α-syn concentration was lower in patients with ET than in controls, with favorable predictive values, suggesting that it could serve as a biomarker for ET diagnosis.

Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of the Functional Impact of Essential Tremor on Activities of Daily Living.

The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) is a popular scale for essential tremor (ET), but its activities of daily living (ADL) and performance (P) subscales are based on a structured interview and physical exam. No patient-reported outcome (PRO) scale for ET has been developed according to US regulatory guidelines. Develop and validate a TETRAS PRO subscale. Fourteen items, rated 0-4, were derived from TETRAS ADL and structured cognitive interviews of 18 ET patients. Convergent validity analyses of TETRAS PRO versus TETRAS ADL, TETRAS-P, and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) were computed for 67 adults with ET or ET plus. Test-retest reliability was computed at intervals of 1 and 30 days. The influence of mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) and coping behaviors (Essen Coping Questionnaire, ECQ) was examined with multiple linear regression. TETRAS PRO was strongly correlated (r > 0.7) with TETRAS ADL, TETRAS-P, and QUEST and exhibited good to excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha 95%CI = 0.853-0.926; 30-day test-retest intraclass correlation 95%CI = 0.814-0.921). The 30-day estimate of minimum detectable change (MDC) was 6.6 (95%CI 5.2-8.0). TETRAS-P (rsemipartial = 0.607), HADS depression (rsemipartial = 0.384), and the coping strategy of information seeking and exchange of experiences (rsemipartial = 0.176) contributed statistically to TETRAS PRO in a multiple linear regression (R2 = 0.67). TETRAS PRO is a valid and reliable scale that is influenced strongly by tremor severity, moderately by mood (depression), and minimally by coping skills. The MDC for TETRAS PRO is probably sufficient to detect clinically important change.

Associations Among Tremor Amplitude, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life in Patients with Essential Tremor.

Essential tremor (ET) is a disabling syndrome consisting of tremor, primarily in the upper limbs. We assessed the correlation of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) Performance Item 4 ratings of upper limb tremor with the TETRAS activities of daily living (ADL) subscale and with 2 quality of life (QoL) scales. This noninterventional, cross-sectional, point-in-time survey of neurologists(n = 60), primary care physicians (n = 38), and their patients with ET (n = 1,003) used real-world data collected through the Adelphi ET Disease Specific Programme™. Physician-reported measures (TETRAS Performance Item 4 and TETRAS ADL total) and patient-reported QoL measures (generic EuroQol-5 Dimension 5 Level [EQ-5D-5 L] and ET-specific Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST)) were assessed with bivariate and multivariable analyses. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. The bivariate association between TETRAS Performance Item 4 score and TETRAS ADL total score was high (Pearson r = 0.761, P < 0.001). The bivariate associations between TETRAS Performance Item 4 score and EQ-5D-5 L index score (r = -0.410, P < 0.001) and between TETRAS ADL total score and EQ-5D-5 L index score (r = -0.543, P < 0.001) were moderate. The bivariate associations between TETRAS Performance Item 4 score and QUEST total score (r = 0.457, P < 0.001), and between TETRAS ADL total score and QUEST total score (r = 0.630, P < 0.001) were also moderate. These associations were unaltered by the inclusion of covariates. This study showed that greater tremor severity (TETRAS Performance Item 4) was positively correlated with ADL impairment (TETRAS ADL) and negatively associated with QoL (EQ-5D-5 L and QUEST). TETRAS Performance Item 4 score is a robust predictor of TETRAS ADL total score, and TETRAS Performance Item 4 and TETRAS ADL total scores were robust predictors of the 2 QoL scales. The results demonstrate the value of TETRAS scores as valid endpoints for future clinical trials. This real-world study assessed TETRAS scores as predictors of impaired QoL in ET. TETRAS Performance Item 4 and ADL were associated with EQ-5D-5 L and QUEST. TETRAS scores may serve as valid endpoints for future clinical trials.

Testing of symmetric biphasic stimulation in Vim-DBS ET patients: a randomized-controlled pilot study.

Symmetric biphasic pulses have been shown to increase the therapeutic window compared to standard cathodic pulses in ET Vim-DBS patients. Furthermore, three hours of stimulation with biphasic pulses caused less stimulation-induced ataxia compared to cathodic pulses. Therefore, an investigation of the longer-term safety of biphasic pulses is warranted. Seven ET patients were included in a randomized double-blind, cross-over design of one week home-use of symmetric biphasic stimulation (anodic phase first) versus cathodic stimulation. Amplitude was set in a double-blinded way, at the tremor arrest threshold. The primary outcome was safety assessed by documenting the adverse events. Secondary outcome parameters were stimulation amplitude, tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale) and ataxia (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale) severity, quality of life (Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire) and cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment). Three patients continued in the open-label extension phase for 3 months, during which biphasic stimulation-only was further assessed by the same outcome parameters. During the 1 week testing, no adverse effects were reported. To obtain equivalent tremor control, the amplitude of the biphasic pulse was significantly higher compared to that of the cathodic pulse (p = 0.003). The other outcome parameters were not significantly different. During the open-label study, one patient used the remote control to increase the amplitude, leading to two falls caused by stimulation-induced ataxia. No other adverse effects occurred. In a small cohort, when tested for one week, symmetric biphasic pulses suggest to be safe, but require higher stimulation amplitudes. Further follow-up studies are needed to investigate long-term effects and safety.

Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus Improves Objective Acoustic Measures of Essential Vocal Tremor.

Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM-DBS) is an established treatment for medically refractory essential tremor. However, the effect of VIM-DBS on vocal tremor remains poorly understood, with results varying by method of vocal tremor assessment and stimulation laterality. This single-center study measures the effect of bilateral VIM-DBS on essential vocal tremor using blinded objective acoustic voice analysis. Ten patients with consecutive essential tremor with comorbid vocal tremor receiving bilateral VIM-DBS underwent voice testing before and after implantation of DBS in this prospective cohort study. Objective acoustic measures were extracted from the middle one second of steady-state phonation including cepstral peak prominence, signal-to-noise ratio, percentage voicing, tremor rate, extent of fundamental frequency modulation, and extent of intensity modulation. DBS surgery was performed awake with microelectrode recording and intraoperative testing. Postoperative voice testing was performed after stable programming. Patients included 6 female and 4 male, with a mean age of 67 ± 6.7 years. The VIM was targeted with the following coordinates relative to the mid-anterior commissure:posterior commissure point: 13.2 ± 0.6 mm lateral, 6.2 ± 0.7 mm posterior, and 0.0 mm below. Mean programming parameters were amplitude 1.72.0 ± 0.6 mA, pulse width 63.0 ± 12.7 µs, and rate 130.6 ± 0.0 Hz. VIM-DBS significantly improved tremor rate from 4.43 ± 0.8 Hz to 3.2 ± 0.8 Hz ( P = .001) CI (0.546, 1.895), jitter from 1 ± 0.94 to 0.53 ± 0.219 ( P = .02) CI (-0.124, 1.038), cepstral peak prominence from 13.6 ± 3.9 to 18.8 ± 2.9 ( P = .016) CI (-4.100, -0.235), signal-to-noise ratio from 15.7 ± 3.9 to 18.5 ± 3.7 ( P = .02) CI (-5.598, -0.037), and articulation rate from 0.77 ± 0.2 to 0.82 ± .14 ( P = .04) CI (-0.097, 0.008). There were no major complications in this series. Objective acoustic voice analyses suggest that bilateral VIM-DBS effectively reduces vocal tremor rate and improves voicing. Further studies using objective acoustic analyses and laryngeal imaging may help refine surgical and stimulation techniques and evaluate the effect of laterality on vocal tremor.

WHIGET and TETRAS Ratings of Action Tremor in Patients with Essential Tremor: Substantial Association and Agreement.

Evaluating tremor severity is a critical component of diagnosing and clinically managing patients with essential tremor (ET). We examined the comparability of tremor severity ratings derived from two frequently used tremor rating scales: the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor (WHIGET) rating scale and the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Scale (TETRAS). A trained assistant administered and videotaped a neurological examination, including eight items assessing upper limb action tremor (arms outstretched, arms in the wingbeat position, finger-nose-finger maneuver, and drawing of Archimedes spirals). An experienced movement disorders neurologist reviewed the videos and assigned WHIGET and TETRAS ratings. We calculated associations between TETRAS and WHIGET ratings using Spearman rank order correlations. Subsequently, we collapsed these ratings into four tremor severity categories (absent, mild, moderate, severe) and then two broader tremor severity categories (absent/mild, moderate/severe). We calculated weighted Kappa coefficients to assess agreement between category assignments based on the TETRAS and the WHIGET. Spearman's r' s were significant for all items (p's ≤ 0.001, mean r = 0.89). Weighted Kappa's revealed substantial to near perfect agreement for all eight items (mean k = 0.86, range = 0.64 to 1.00). Analyses revealed substantial strength of association and substantial to near perfect agreement between items rated with the WHIGET and TETRAS scales. These data indicated that ratings provided by each scale are highly comparable.

Conversion From Immediate-Release to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Patients With Tremor: A Case Series Study

Background/AimTremor is common with tacrolimus treatment and is linked with peak blood drug concentrations. We investigated the effect of switching from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC) to MeltDose prolonged-release tacrolimus (LCPT) on tremor in kidney transplant recipients experiencing tremor at therapeutic levels of IR-TAC. MethodsThe Activities of Daily Living Subscale (ADL, range 0-48, lower = better) of the Essential Tremor Rating Scale was used to assess the effect of therapy change on speech, occupational impairment and social activities over a 12-month follow-up period. ResultsThe study included 18 patients (mean age = 45.6 y, range 26-73; median (IQR) time from transplant = 1.1 y (0.6-1.5), with baseline IR-TAC trough concentrations (C0) ranging from 4.2 to 9.4 ng/mL (mean C0 = 6.7 ± 1.3 ng/mL). After the switch to LCPT, the mean ADL score improved from baseline 11.2 to 8.4 after 7 to 14 days (an 18% improvement, P < .001). This improvement was sustained after 3 months (ADL score = 5.0, 46% improvement vs baseline), 6 months (ADL score = 4.4, 48% improvement vs baseline), and 12 months (ADL score = 3.6, 63% improvement vs baseline); all P < .001. Despite a 40% reduction in LCPT daily doses (mean −1.9 mg/day compared to IR-TAC), the achieved C0 was constant during the course of the 12-month observation (P = .755). The renal function remained stable after conversion (eGFR 12 months vs baseline = +1.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI: −5.6 to +7.9). ConclusionConversion to LCPT may alleviate symptom burden and improve daily activities in kidney transplant recipients experiencing tremor within therapeutic IR-TAC concentrations.

Enhancing outcomes in deep brain stimulation: a comparative study of direct targeting using 7T versus 3T MRI.

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of direct targeting in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor using 7T MRI versus 3T MRI. The authors hypothesized that 7T MRI direct targeting would be noninferior to 3T MRI in early tremor outcomes. A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing unilateral thalamic DBS for essential tremor between 2021 and 2023. Two matched cohorts were assessed, one using 7T MRI and the other using 3T MRI for surgical planning. The primary endpoint was the percentage improvement in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) scores. Additionally, the authors assessed optimized programming settings and variance in electrode position on postoperative imaging. Demographic and clinical data were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test. The squared Euclidean distance of each contact from the group mean centroid was calculated and averaged across the entire cohort to provide the variance (i.e., the mean squared distance) of electrode contact position. A total of 34 patients were analyzed, with 17 in each cohort. There were no significant differences in demographic information or mean surgical dates between the groups. There were no differences in intraoperative target repositioning or adverse events. The 7T group had a significantly greater TRS improvement than the 3T group (64.9% ± 11.4% vs 50.9% ± 16.4%, p = 0.004). Patients in the 7T cohort also had a lower mean stimulation current compared with those in the 3T cohort (2.0 ± 0.8 mA vs 2.7 ± 0.9 mA, p = 0.01). Image evaluation revealed that although the mean electrode position was comparable between 7T and 3T, the 7T electrode positioning was more clustered, indicating a lower variance in the final electrode location. The mean Euclidean distance between the individual electrode tips and the group centroid was significantly less at 7T than at 3T (1.82 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.75 ± 0.81 mm, p = 0.001). Despite concerns for increased artifacts and distortions at 7T, the authors show that these effects can be mitigated with an appropriate workflow, leading to improved surgical outcomes with direct targeting using 7T MRI. Their results suggest similar accuracy but greater precision in targeting with 7T MRI compared with 3T MRI, resulting in lower stimulation currents and improved tremor reduction. Future studies are needed to assess outcomes related to 7T MRI in targeting other subcortical structures.

Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Target Consideration.

The thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is a well-established target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of essential tremor (ET). Increasing data indicate that the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) may be superior, but high-level evidence is limited. We aimed at further comparing the intraindividual efficacy and side effect profile of PSA vs VIM DBS in ET. In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 4-contact DBS leads were bilaterally implanted with single-trajectory covering the VIM and PSA. Patients were randomized postsurgery to 2 groups, receiving VIM stimulation (4-7 months) and then PSA stimulation (8-11 months) or vice versa. The primary end point was the difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM vs PSA DBS period in the total score of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS). Ten patients with medically refractory ET were enrolled, and 9 completed the study. The difference between reduction of FTM-TRS total score in the PSA vs VIM DBS period was -7.4 (95% CI: -28.5 to 13.7, P = .328). Clinical benefit was achieved at significantly lower stimulation intensity under PSA DBS. Furthermore, PSA DBS provided greater improvement in head tremor subscore of FTM-TRS (PSA vs VIM: -2.2, P = .020) and disease-specific quality of life (PSA vs VIM: -13.8, P = .046) and induced fewer speech (Dysphonia Severity Index score: P = .043; diadochokinetic rate: P = .007; VDI score: P = .005) and gait disturbances compared with VIM DBS. Seven patients remained with PSA DBS after the crossover phase. Our study confirms that PSA-DBS is comparable with VIM-DBS in suppressing tremors, superior in improving disease-specific quality of life, and possibly more effective in reducing head tremor.

Pose-based tremor type and level analysis for Parkinson's disease from video.

Current methods for diagnosis of PD rely on clinical examination. The accuracy of diagnosis ranges between 73 and 84%, and is influenced by the experience of the clinical assessor. Hence, an automatic, effective and interpretable supporting system for PD symptom identification would support clinicians in making more robust PD diagnostic decisions. We propose to analyze Parkinson's tremor (PT) to support the analysis of PD, since PT is one of the most typical symptoms of PD with broad generalizability. To realize the idea, we present SPA-PTA, a deep learning-based PT classification and severity estimation system that takes consumer-grade videos of front-facing humans as input. The core of the system is a novel attention module with a lightweight pyramidal channel-squeezing-fusion architecture that effectively extracts relevant PT information and filters noise. It enhances modeling performance while improving system interpretability. We validate our system via individual-based leave-one-out cross-validation on two tasks: the PT classification task and the tremor severity rating estimation task. Our system presents a 91.3% accuracy and 80.0% F1-score in classifying PT with non-PT class, while providing a 76.4% accuracy and 76.7% F1-score in more complex multiclass tremor rating classification task. Our system offers a cost-effective PT classification and tremor severity estimation results as warning signs of PD for undiagnosed patients with PT symptoms. In addition, it provides a potential solution for supporting PD diagnosis in regions with limited clinical resources.

Disbalanced recruitment of crossed and uncrossed cerebello-thalamic pathways during deep brain stimulation is predictive of delayed therapy escape in essential tremor

BackgroundThalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an efficacious treatment for drug-resistant essential tremor (ET) and the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT) constitutes an important target structure. However, up to 40% of patients habituate and lose treatment efficacy over time, frequently accompanied by a stimulation-induced cerebellar syndrome. The phenomenon termed delayed therapy escape (DTE) is insufficiently understood. Our previous work showed that DTE clinically is pronounced on the non-dominant side and suggested that differential involvement of crossed versus uncrossed DRT (DRTx/DRTu) might play a role in DTE development. MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled right-handed patients under bilateral thalamic DBS >12 months for ET from a cross-sectional study. They were characterized with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTMTRS) and Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) scores at different timepoints. Normative fiber tractographic evaluations of crossed and uncrossed cerebellothalamic pathways and volume of activated tissue (VAT) studies together with [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were applied. ResultsA total of 29 patients met the inclusion criteria. Favoring DRTu over DRTx in the non-dominant VAT was associated with DTE (R2 = 0.4463, p < 0.01) and ataxia (R2 = 0.2319, p < 0.01). Moreover, increasing VAT size on the right (non-dominant) side was associated at trend level with more asymmetric glucose metabolism shifting towards the right (dominant) dentate nucleus. ConclusionOur results suggest that a disbalanced recruitment of DRTu in the non-dominant VAT induces detrimental stimulation effects on the dominant cerebellar outflow (together with contralateral stimulation) leading to DTE and thus hampering the overall treatment efficacy.

Impact of Switching From Immediate- or Prolonged-Release to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) on Tremor in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Observational ELIT Study.

Once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) exhibits increased bioavailability versus immediate-release (IR-TAC) and prolonged release (PR-TAC) tacrolimus. Improvements in tremor were previously reported in a limited number of kidney transplant patients who switched to LCPT. We conducted a non-interventional, non-randomized, uncontrolled, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study to assess the impact of switching to LCPT on tremor and quality of life (QoL) in a larger population of stable kidney transplant patients. The primary endpoint was change in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) score; secondary endpoints included 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) scores, tacrolimus trough concentrations, neurologic symptoms, and safety assessments. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess change in TETRAS score and tacrolimus trough concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio by prior tacrolimus formulation and tacrolimus metabolizer status. Among 221 patients, the mean decrease of TETRAS score after switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). There was no statistically significant difference in change in TETRAS score after switch to LCPT between patients who had received IR-TAC and those who had received PR-TAC before switch, or between fast and slow metabolizers of tacrolimus. The overall increase of C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and from baseline to either M1 or M3 (both p < 0.0001) in the mITT population and in all subgroups. In the fast metabolizers group, the C0/D ratio crossed over the threshold of 1.05ng/mL/mg after the switch to LCPT. Other neurologic symptoms tended to improve, and the SF-12 mental component summary score improved significantly. No new safety concerns were evident. In this observational study, all patients had a significant improvement of tremor, QoL and C0/D ratio post-switch to LCPT irrespective of the previous tacrolimus formulation administered (IR-TAC or PR-TAC) and irrespective from their metabolism status (fast or slow metabolizers).