Trees provide numerous benefits in urban areas, including improving stormwater retention and filtration, removing gaseous and particulate pollutants from the air, sequestering atmospheric carbon, and reducing ambient temperature. However, trees also pose risks in urban areas. Trees growing near overhead electrical utility lines cause a large proportion of electrical power outages. To mitigate this risk, arborists frequently and sometimes severely prune trees near overhead utilities for clearance and to reduce the likelihood of failure. Ostensibly, urban trees distant from utility lines are not pruned as frequently or severely. This study aimed to (i) assess factors related to both individual trees and the sample populations of trees growing near and away from overhead utility lines, and (ii) determine whether those factors differed between the two groups. In total, 200 utility easement plots and 200 non-utility control plots were distributed in Eversource Energy’s distribution territories, encompassing 2361 trees in total. Diameter at breast height (DBH), crown height and spread, percent crown missing, percent twig dieback, and likelihood of failure were gathered for each tree in the study. These variables were compared individually among study groups, and used as inputs to calculate estimated ecosystem service delivery using USFS iTree Eco v6. Overall, trees in control plots were larger and delivered more ecosystem services, per tree, than trees in utility plots. However, on a population level, trees in utility plots were more populous and delivered more aggregate ecosystem services than those in control plots. Although the aesthetics of utility tree pruning is often debated, there were no differences in likelihood of failure ratings between trees in control and utility plots. These findings may help to frame trees near overhead utility lines, commonly seen as risks or eyesores, as valuable green infrastructure and community assets.