Blood Pressure Treatment Targets Research Articles

Population health value of being in target: Results from the Canadian Multi-Morbidity Model for Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo develop a microsimulation model for type 2 diabetes using population-level real-world data. Such a model allows for the synthesis of multiple data sources for comparative effectiveness analysis related to a variety of correlated outcomes. ApproachThe model was built using health state features including sex, age, diabetes duration, laboratory test results, and a history of major acute events. Features update using a cycle length of one month. Events modelled include myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, amputation and death. Model outputs include counts of events, lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We then used the model to calculate the number of events that could be averted if a population with type 2 diabetes achieved treatment targets for HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol for 10 years. ResultsBringing all 60-year-olds with type 2 diabetes into target for 10 years would result in annual event reductions of 87.0 per 100,000 person-years for myocardial infarction, 49.4 for stroke, and 166.8 for heart failure. QALYs would improve by 1,155 per 100,000 patients. For 75-year-olds, annual event reductions would be 178.2, 56.8 and 261.6 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, and QALYs would improve by 2,121 per 100,000 patients. ConclusionsPopulation-level real-world data can be used to develop microsimulation models for type 2 diabetes that estimate long-term event risks, mortality and healthcare costs. This model is capable of comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of novel therapies in diabetes.

An Overview of Electrical Nerve Stimulation via Transdermal Application

The risk of dying from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases is significantly increased by hypertension. The primary issues affecting public health at the moment are hypertension and its consequences. Some persons with hypertension, even under intensive therapeutic supervision, do not achieve the specified blood pressure (BP) treatment targets. Patients with resistant hypertension (RH) may be defined as those who need to take three or more different kinds of antihypertensive medications in order to reach their blood pressure target. Utilizing the body's natural bioelectric system, bioelectric technology is a relatively new approach. In auxiliary evaluation, pain management, and organ function rehabilitation, it is commonly used. Renal sympathetic denervation, carotid baroreflex activation therapy, electroacupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are the primary forms of bioelectrical technology, which has advanced quickly in recent years as an effective treatment for RH.

Multiple cardiovascular risk factor care in 55 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional analysis of nationally-representative, individual-level data from 280,783 adults.

The prevalence of multiple age-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors is high among individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We described receipt of healthcare services for and management of hypertension and diabetes among individuals living with these conditions using individual-level data from 55 nationally representative population-based surveys (2009-2019) with measured blood pressure (BP) and diabetes biomarker. We restricted our analysis to non-pregnant individuals aged 40-69 years and defined three mutually exclusive groups (i.e., hypertension only, diabetes only, and both hypertension-diabetes) to compare individuals living with concurrent hypertension and diabetes to individuals with each condition separately. We included 90,086 individuals who lived with hypertension only, 11,975 with diabetes only, and 16,228 with hypertension-diabetes. We estimated the percentage of individuals who were aware of their diagnosis, used pharmacological therapy, or achieved appropriate hypertension and diabetes management. A greater percentage of individuals with hypertension-diabetes were fully diagnosed (64.1% [95% CI: 61.8-66.4]) than those with hypertension only (47.4% [45.3-49.6]) or diabetes only (46.7% [44.1-49.2]). Among the hypertension-diabetes group, pharmacological treatment was higher for individual conditions (38.3% [95% CI: 34.8-41.8] using antihypertensive and 42.3% [95% CI: 39.4-45.2] using glucose-lowering medications) than for both conditions jointly (24.6% [95% CI: 22.1-27.2]).The percentage of individuals achieving appropriate management was highest in the hypertension group (17.6% [16.4-18.8]), followed by diabetes (13.3% [10.7-15.8]) and hypertension-diabetes (6.6% [5.4-7.8]) groups. Although health systems in LMICs are reaching a larger share of individuals living with both hypertension and diabetes than those living with just one of these conditions, only seven percent achieved both BP and blood glucose treatment targets. Implementation of cost-effective population-level interventions that shift clinical care paradigm from disease-specific to comprehensive CVD care are urgently needed for all three groups, especially for those with multiple CVD risk factors.

Representation of Real-World Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease in Clinical Trials Supporting Blood Pressure Treatment Targets.

Little is known about how well trial participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) represent real-world adults with CKD. We assessed the population representativeness of clinical trials supporting the 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes blood pressure (BP) guidelines in real-world adults with CKD. Using a cross-sectional analysis, we identified patients with CKD who met the guideline definition of hypertension based on use of antihypertensive medications or sustained systolic BP ≥120 mm Hg in 2019 in the Veterans Affairs and Kaiser Permanente of Southern California. We applied the eligibility criteria from 3 BP target trials, SPRINT (Systolic Pressure Intervention Trial), ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes), and AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease), to estimate the proportion of adults with a systolic BP above the guideline-recommended target and the proportion who met eligibility criteria for ≥1 trial. We identified 503 480 adults in the Veterans Affairs and 73 412 adults in Kaiser Permanente of Southern California with CKD and hypertension in 2019. We estimated 79.7% in the Veterans Affairs and 87.3% in the Kaiser Permanente of Southern California populations had a systolic BP ≥120 mm Hg; only 23.8% [23.7%-24.0%] in the Veterans Affairs and 20.8% [20.5%-21.1%] in Kaiser Permanente of Southern California were trial-eligible. Among trial-ineligible patients, >50% met >1 exclusion criteria. Major BP target trials were representative of fewer than 1 in 4 real-world adults with CKD and hypertension. A large proportion of adults who are at risk for cardiovascular morbidity from hypertension and susceptible to adverse treatment effects lack relevant treatment information.

Representation of Real-World Adults with CKD in Clinical Trials Supporting Blood Pressure Treatment Targets

Representation of Real-World Adults with CKD in Clinical Trials Supporting Blood Pressure Treatment Targets

Baseline treatments and metabolic control of 288,913 type 2 diabetes patients in a 10-year retrospective cohort in Malaysia

Diabetes is one of the quickest-growing global health emergencies of the twenty-first century, and data-driven care can improve the quality of diabetes management. We aimed to describe the formation of a 10-year retrospective open cohort of type 2 diabetes patients in Malaysia. We also described the baseline treatment profiles and HbA1c, blood pressure, and lipid control to assess the quality of diabetes care. We used 10 years of cross-sectional audit datasets from the National Diabetes Registry and merged 288,913 patients with the same identifying information into a 10-year open cohort dataset. Treatment targets for HbA1c, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were based on Malaysian clinical practice guidelines. IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0 was used, and frequencies and percentages with 95% confidence intervals were reported. In total, 288,913 patients were included, with 62.3% women and 54.1% younger adults. The commonest diabetes treatment modality was oral hypoglycaemic agents (75.9%). Meanwhile, 19.3% of patients had ≥ 3 antihypertensive agents, and 71.2% were on lipid-lowering drugs. Metformin (86.1%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (49.6%), and statins (69.2%) were the most prescribed antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering medications, respectively. The mean HbA1c was 7.96 ± 2.11, and 31.2% had HbA1c > 8.5%. Only 35.8% and 35.2% attained blood pressure < 140/80 mmHg and LDL-cholesterol < 2.6 mmol/L, respectively. About 57.5% and 52.9% achieved their respective triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol goals. In conclusion, data integration is a feasible method in this diabetes registry. HbA1c, blood pressure, and lipids are not optimally controlled, and these findings can be capitalized as a guideline by clinicians, programme managers, and health policymakers to improve the quality of diabetes care and prevent long-term complications in Malaysia.

Hypertension and small vessel disease: do the drugs work?

Associations of hypertension with ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage, particularly when attributed to cerebral small vessel disease, are well established. While it seems plausible that treating hypertension should prevent small vessel disease from developing or progressing, there is limited evidence demonstrating this. This article critically appraises the evidence answering this clinical question. Hypertension is also closely associated with chronic kidney disease, with anatomical and functional similarities between the vasculature of the brain and kidneys leading to the hypothesis that shared multi-system pathophysiological processes may be involved. Therefore, the article also summarises data on prevention of progression of chronic kidney disease. Evidence supports a target blood pressure of <130/80 mmHg to optimally prevent progression of both small vessel disease and chronic kidney disease. However, future studies are needed to determine long-term effects of more intensive blood pressure treatment targets on small vessel disease progression and incident dementia.

Lifestyle Medicine as a Treatment for Resistant Hypertension.

Approximately 10% of the adults with hypertension fail to achieve the recommended blood pressure treatment targets on 3 antihypertensive medications or require ≥ 4 medications to achieve goal. These patients with 'resistant hypertension' have an increased risk of target organ damage, adverse clinical events, and all-cause mortality. Although lifestyle modification is widely recommended as a first-line approach for the management of high blood pressure, the effects of lifestyle modifications in patients with resistant hypertension has not been widely studied. This review aims to provide an overview of the emerging evidence on the benefits of lifestyle modifications in patients with resistant hypertension, reviews potential mechanisms by which lifestyles may reduce blood pressure, and discusses the clinical implications of the recent findings in this field. Evidence from single-component randomized clinical trials demonstrated that aerobic exercise, weight loss and dietary modification can reduce clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. Moreover, evidence from multi-component trials involving exercise and dietary modification and weight management can facilitate lifestyle change, reduce clinic and ambulatory blood pressure, and improve biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. This new evidence supports the efficacy of lifestyle modifications added to optimized medical therapy in reducing blood pressure and improving cardiovascular risk biomarkers in patients with resistant hypertension. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies, and the persistence of benefit over extended follow-up needs further study.

Arterial Hypertension-clinical trials update 2023.

Arterial hypertension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and research in the field is highly dynamic. This summary reviews the most important clinical trials published in 2022 and early 2023. Findings on new pharmacological approaches to treat resistant hypertension are presented and new knowledge about the optimal timing of the antihypertensive medication intake is discussed. It is focused on optimal blood pressure treatment targets and the problem of treatment and guideline inertia is acknowledged. Information about pregnancy-related hypertension is presented and blood pressure control following percutaneous thrombectomy after ischemic stroke is discussed. Finally, novel clinical data on device-based approaches to treat hypertension are summarized. The hypertension trials update summarizes the most important clincal trials on hypertension research in 2022 and early 2023. CTD - chlorthalidone, CV - cardiovascular, HCT - hydrochlorothiazide, SBP - systolic blood pressure, RDN - renal denervation *depicts systolic blood pressure only.

Clinical Outcomes of Intensive Inpatient Blood Pressure Management in Hospitalized Older Adults

Asymptomatic blood pressure (BP) elevations are common in hospitalized older adults, and widespread heterogeneity in the clinical management of elevated inpatient BPs exists. To examine the association of intensive treatment of elevated inpatient BPs with in-hospital clinical outcomes of older adults hospitalized for noncardiac conditions. This retrospective cohort study examined Veterans Health Administration data between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, for patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized for noncardiovascular diagnoses and who experienced elevated BPs in the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Intensive BP treatment following the first 48 hours of hospitalization, defined as receipt of intravenous antihypertensives or oral classes not used prior to admission. The primary outcome was a composite of inpatient mortality, intensive care unit transfer, stroke, acute kidney injury, B-type natriuretic peptide elevation, and troponin elevation. Data were analyzed between October 1, 2021, and January 10, 2023, with propensity score overlap weighting used to adjust for confounding between those who did and did not receive early intensive treatment. Among 66 140 included patients (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [8.1] years; 97.5% male and 2.6% female; 17.4% Black, 1.7% Hispanic, and 75.9% White), 14 084 (21.3%) received intensive BP treatment in the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Patients who received early intensive treatment vs those who did not continued to receive a greater number of additional antihypertensives during the remainder of their hospitalization (mean additional doses, 6.1 [95% CI, 5.8-6.4] vs 1.6 [95% CI, 1.5-1.8], respectively). Intensive treatment was associated with a greater risk of the primary composite outcome (1220 [8.7%] vs 3570 [6.9%]; weighted odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.18-1.39), with the highest risk among patients receiving intravenous antihypertensives (weighted OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.65-2.19). Intensively treated patients were more likely to experience each component of the composite outcome except for stroke and mortality. Findings were consistent across subgroups stratified by age, frailty, preadmission BP, early hospitalization BP, and cardiovascular disease history. The study's findings indicate that among hospitalized older adults with elevated BPs, intensive pharmacologic antihypertensive treatment was associated with a greater risk of adverse events. These findings do not support the treatment of elevated inpatient BPs without evidence of end organ damage, and they highlight the need for randomized clinical trials of inpatient BP treatment targets.

Integration of preprocedural computed tomography scan findings into atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimation in patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for catheter ablation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atherosclerosis often coexist due to a shared risk profile. Prior to an AF ablation, computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely performed to assess pulmonary vein anatomy. Often coronary plaques are described as incidental findings. According to current guidelines, patients with coronary plaques on CT are classified as being at very high risk of developing cardiovascular atherosclerotic events, potentially resulting in a redefinition of treatment targets for comorbidities. Purpose This study estimated individual 10-year risks of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) events according to the 2021 ESC guideline on CVD prevention before and after the integration of CT-derived coronary plaque information in the risk assessment of AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation. Methods Consecutive AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation were included in the ISOLATION registry (NCT04342312). Patients were excluded from this subanalysis if no preprocedural CT was performed. Each patient was classified as being at low-to-moderate, high, or very high risk of developing CVD in the coming 10 years according to the 2021 ESC guideline on CVD prevention (Figure 1). This classification was based on previous CVD, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, or the Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation 2 (SCORE2) or SCORE2-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) risk estimation. The impact of pre-AF ablation CTs on CVD risk was assessed by comparing risk classifications excluding and including information on coronary plaques on CT. Results A total of 1022 patients (age 64 ±9, 664 [65%] male, 686 [67%] paroxysmal AF) was included. Overall CVD risk was high, with 86% of patients at a high (n=190, 19%) or very high (n=693, 68%) 10-year risk of developing CVD events. Coronary plaques were observed in 59% (n=606) of pre-AF ablation CTs. Integration of the CT-derived information on coronary plaques resulted in reclassification of 364 patients (36%) towards the very high risk category (Figure 2). Previous CVD events were observed in 161 very high risk patients (16%). Conclusion In AF patients scheduled for catheter ablation, integration of the information on coronary plaques derived from the pre-AF ablation CT resulted in reclassification of one in three patients towards the very high risk category, which impacted treatment targets for lipid levels and blood pressure.

The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline and Blood Pressure in Older Adults

The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline redefined hypertension and lowered the blood pressure treatment target. Empirical data on the guideline's impact are needed. Data were analyzed from Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants who attended baseline pre-guideline (2016-2017) and post-guideline (2018-2019) visits with baseline systolic blood pressure between 120 and 159 mmHg. Participants were grouped according to baseline systolic blood pressure by change in classification under the new guideline as follows: not reclassified (120-129 mmHg), reclassified to Stage 1 hypertension (130-139 mmHg), and reclassified to Stage 2 hypertension (140-159 mmHg). Means and 95% CIs for systolic blood pressure changes between baseline and follow-up, changes in antihypertensive use, and percentages that achieved the post-guideline recommendation (systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg) were calculated. Analyses were performed in 2021-2022. Among 2,193 community-dwelling Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities participants aged 71-95 years at baseline, systolic blood pressure changes between baseline and follow-up visits differed among participants not reclassified (+4.1 mmHg, 95% CI=3.0, 5.3 mmHg), reclassified to Stage 1 hypertension (-1.1 mmHg, 95% CI= -2.2, 0.1 mmHg), and reclassified to Stage 2 hypertension (-5.7 mmHg, 95% CI= -6.8, -4.7 mmHg). Antihypertensive use changed from 77.3% to 78.4% (p=0.25) among participants reclassified to Stage 1 hypertension and from 78.3% to 81.4% (p<0.01) among participants reclassified to Stage 2 hypertension. At follow-up, 41.8% of the Stage 1 and 22.4% of the Stage 2 hypertension groups reached the systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg goal. There were small decreases in systolic blood pressure and increases in antihypertensive therapy among older adults reclassified to Stage 2 hypertension but not among those reclassified to Stage 1 hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline.

The prevalence and treatment of hypertension in Veterans Health Administration, assessing the impact of the updated clinical guidelines.

Hypertension is the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several guidelines have lowered diagnostic blood pressure (BP) thresholds and treatment targets for hypertension. We evaluated the impact of the more stringent guidelines among Veterans, a population at high risk of CVD. We conducted a retrospective analysis of Veterans with at least two office BP measurements between January 2016 and December 2017. Prevalent hypertension was defined as diagnostic codes related to hypertension, prescribed antihypertensive drugs, or office BP values according to the BP cutoffs at least 140/90 mmHg (Joint National Committee 7 [JNC 7]), at least 130/80 mmHg [American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)], or the 2020 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) guideline (BP ≥130/90 mmHg). Uncontrolled BP was defined per the VHA guideline as mean SBP ≥130 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg. The prevalence of hypertension increased from 71% for BP at least 140/90 to 81% for BP at least 130/90 mmHg and further to 87% for BP at least 130/80 mmHg. Among Veterans with known hypertension ( n = 2 768 826), a majority [ n = 1 818 951 (66%)] were considered to have uncontrolled BP per the VHA guideline. Lowering the treatment targets for SBP and DBP significantly increased the number of Veterans who would require initiation of or intensification of pharmacotherapy. The majority of Veterans with uncontrolled BP and at least one CVD risk factor remained uncontrolled after 5 years of follow-up. Lowering the BP diagnostic and treatment cutoffs increases the burden on healthcare systems significantly. Targeted interventions are needed to achieve the BP treatment goals.

Cardiac structure and function in resistant hypertension: The beneficial role of blood pressure control.

Cardiac structure and function in resistant hypertension: The beneficial role of blood pressure control.

AAFP Issues New Clinical Practice Guideline on Hypertension.

The AAFP has published a new clinical practice guideline on appropriate blood pressure treatment targets for adults with hypertension. The guideline applies to individuals with hypertension (with or without cardiovascular disease) and focuses on target blood pressure levels rather than specific

Gender differences in cardiovascular risk, treatment, and outcomes: a post hoc analysis from the REWIND trial

Objectives. To assess whether the use of cardioprotective therapies for type 2 diabetes varies by gender and whether the risk of cardiovascular events is higher in women versus men in the REWIND trial, including an international type 2 diabetes patient population with a wide range of baseline risk. Design. Gender differences in baseline characteristics, cardioprotective therapy, and the achieved clinical targets at baseline and two years were analyzed. Hazards for cardiovascular outcomes (fatal/nonfatal stroke, fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and heart failure hospitalization), in women versus men were analyzed using two Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for randomized treatment and key baseline characteristics respectively. Time-to-event analyses were performed in subgroups with or without history of cardiovascular disease using Cox proportional hazards models that included gender, subgroup, randomized treatment, and gender-by-subgroup interactions. Results. Of 9901 participants, 46.3% were women. Significantly fewer women than men had a cardiovascular disease history. Although most women met treatment targets for blood pressure (96.7%) and lipids (72.8%), fewer women than men met the target for cardioprotective therapies at baseline and after two years, particularly those with prior cardiovascular disease, who used less renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, statins, and aspirin than men. Despite these differences, women had lower hazards than men for all outcomes except stroke. No significant gender and cardiovascular disease history interactions were identified for cardiovascular outcomes. Conclusions. In REWIND, most women met clinically relevant treatment targets, but in lower proportions than men. Women had a lower risk for all cardiovascular outcomes except stroke. Clinical trials.gov registration number: NCT01394952

Economic evaluation of new blood pressure target for hypertensive patients in Taiwan according to the 2022 hypertension clinical practice guidelines of the Taiwan society of cardiology: a simulation modeling study.

With the promising cardiovascular benefits in the STEP and SPRINT trials, the2022 Taiwan's hypertension guidelines redefined the hypertension threshold as 130/80 mmHg and a universal blood-pressure target of <130/80 mmHg. This study's objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intensive blood-pressure target for hypertensive patients using estimated lifetime medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) from the Taiwan national payer's perspective. We developed a lifetime Markov model comparing the intensive and conservative blood-pressure targets. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) against the willing-to-pay thresholds at the one-time [US$34,000(NT$1,020,000)] and three-time [US$100,000(NT$3,000,000)] gross domestic product per capita were defined as very cost-effect and only cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness in different age stratifications and cardiovascular risks treated with a more intensive target (120 mmHg) were examined in the subgroup analyses. The new blood-pressure treatment target produced more lifetime medical costs [US$31,589(NT$947,670) versus US$26,788(NT$803,640)] and QALYs (12.54 versus 12.25), and the ICER was US$16,589(NT$497,670), which was 99.1% and 100% probability of a very cost-effective and cost-effective strategy. The ICERs in all age stratifications had more than a 90% probability of being very cost-effective, and ICERs decreased with age. More intensive control in patients with high cardiovascular risks produced a lower ICER [US$14,547(NT$436,410)]. In conclusion, Taiwan's new blood-pressure treatment target can prevent more cardiovascular events with acceptable costs per QALY below the willing-to-pay thresholds. The cost-effectiveness of intensive control is consistent across different ages and more pronounced with the increase in age and cardiovascular risk.

Frail by four different measures and new adverse events from lower blood pressure control in hypertensive older adults: a 2-year prospective study in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Abstract Background The 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines for management of hypertension in adults aged ≥65 years recommend a blood pressure (BP) treatment target of 130–139/70–79 mmHg if tolerated [1]. Randomised controlled trials have advocated for lower BP, but this may lead to adverse outcomes in the frail. Yet, different operationalisations of frailty exist in the literature [2,3]. Purpose We compared four frailty classifications in their ability to predict 2-year incident adverse outcomes (falls/fractures, syncope, transient ischaemic attack/stroke, heart attack, heart failure, hospitalisation, and mortality) associated with below-target BP control (&amp;lt;130/70 mmHg) in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Methods Data from participants aged ≥65 years treated for hypertension in Wave 1 (W1) was analysed. Frailty was identified by Frailty Phenotype (FP) [4], the Clinical Frailty Scale-classification tree (CFS) [5], a 32-item self-reported Frailty Index (FI) [6], and the 5-item FRAIL (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses &amp; Loss of Weight) scale [7]. We formulated 16 participant groups at W1 based on frailty-BP combinations. Outcomes at wave 2 (W2) two years later were analysed with binary logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, polypharmacy, classic orthostatic hypotension, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score and number of chronic diseases. Results Of 1920 W1 participants aged ≥65 years and treated for hypertension, 1229 had full BP/FP data, 1282 for BP/CFS, 1274 for BP/FI, and 1276 for BP/FRAIL. The non-frail groups in all 4 frailty classifications with BP treated below or above target did not have an increased risk of any of the adverse health outcomes at W2. For the frail treated below target, hospitalisation by W2 was significantly more likely in those who were frail by FP and FRAIL. The frail by FRAIL and BP treated below target were the only with increased risk of mortality by W2. The frail by FI and FRAIL with BP treated below target had increased risk of new heart failure and falls/fractures by W2. Conclusions Frailty was independently associated with adverse outcomes in hypertensive older adults treated below the ESC/ESH target. However, different frailty classifications had different prognostic implications. For those below BP target, frailty by FRAIL was associated with the highest number of risks (falls/fractures, heart failure, hospitalisation and mortality), followed by the frail by FI (falls/fractures, heart failure). Based on our results and frailty measures considered, we recommend that FRAIL and FI are regarded as the methods of choice to identify frailty when applying the ESC/ESH guideline. Models of frailty that do not explicitly measure comorbidities (such as FP and CFS) may be less useful to capture risk of adverse events from lower blood pressure control. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Irish Department of HealthIrish LifeAtlantic PhilanthropiesRoman Romero-Ortuno is funded by a grant from Science Foundation Ireland

Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques

Current hypertension guidelines recommend using the average values of several blood pressure (BP) readings obtained both in and out of the office for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. In-office BP measurement using an upper-arm cuff constitutes the evidence-based reference method for current BP classification and treatment targets. However, out-of-office BP evaluation using 24 h ambulatory or home BP monitoring is recommended by all major medical associations for obtaining further insights into the BP profile of an individual and how it relates to their daily activities. Importantly, the highly variable nature of office and out-of-office BP readings has been widely acknowledged, including the association of BP variability with cardiovascular outcomes. However, to date, the implications of BP variability on cardiovascular outcomes have largely been ignored, with limited application in clinical practice. Novel cuffless wearable technologies might provide a detailed assessment of the 24 h BP profile and behaviour over weeks or months. These devices offer many advantages for researchers and patients compared with traditional BP monitors, but their accuracy and utility remain uncertain. In this Review, we outline and compare conventional and novel methods and techniques for assessing average BP levels and BP variability, and reflect on the utility and potential of these methods for improving the treatment and management of patients with hypertension.

Advances in the Treatment Strategies in Hypertension: Present and Future.

Hypertension is the most frequent chronic and non-communicable disease all over the world, with about 1.5 billion affected individuals worldwide. Its impact is currently growing, particularly in low-income countries. Even in high-income countries, hypertension remains largely underdiagnosed and undertreated, with consequent low rates of blood pressure (BP) control. Notwithstanding the large number of clinical observational studies and randomized trials over the past four decades, it is sad to note that in the last few years there has been an impressive paucity of innovative studies. Research focused on BP mechanisms and novel antihypertensive drugs is slowing dramatically. The present review discusses some advances in the management of hypertensive patients, and could play a clinical role in the years to come. First, digital/health technology is expected to be increasingly used, although some crucial points remain (development of non-intrusive and clinically validated devices for ambulatory BP measurement, robust storing systems enabling rapid analysis of accrued data, physician-patient interactions, etc.). Second, several areas should be better outlined with regard to BP diagnosis and treatment targets. Third, from a therapeutic standpoint, existing antihypertensive drugs, which are generally effective and well tolerated, should be better used by exploiting available and novel free and fixed combinations. In particular, spironolactone and other mineral-corticoid receptor antagonists should be used more frequently to improve BP control. In particular, some drugs initially developed for conditions different from hypertension including heart failure and diabetes have demonstrated to lower BP significantly and should therefore be considered. Finally, renal artery denervation is another procedure that has proven effective in the management of hypertension.