Treatment-related Events Research Articles

Cardiological monitoring during BTK inhibitor, ICI, and RAF/MEK inhibitor therapy: the single-center prospective registry for cardiovascular events under new cancer therapies (RECENT)

Abstract Background The advent of novel targeted cancer therapies have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, concerns about their impact on cardiovascular health persist and current guidelines recommend cardiac monitoring. Yet, prospective data on incidence rates of cardiovascular events are lacking. The Registry for Cardiovascular Events under new cancer Therapies (RECENT) aims to systematically assess clinical as well as subclinical cardiovascular incidents in patients undergoing these novel therapies to identify baseline risk factors and derive individualized monitoring strategies. Methods This ongoing single-center prospective registry enrolls cancer patients receiving BTK inhibitors, ICI, or RAF/MEK inhibitors. Baseline cardiovascular assessment, risk stratification according to HFA-ICOS risk score, and follow up visits for 12 months at three-monthly intervals (including ECG, biomarkers and echocardiography) during treatment are conducted. Treatment-related events, in particular hypertension, arrhythmias, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD), and (peri-) myocarditis, as defined according to current guideline recommendations, are recorded. Results We report data of the first 85 patients (60.9 ± 14.7 years, 52.9% male) included in this ongoing registry. Of those, 17/85 patients received treatment with BTK inhibitors (20%), 45/85 with ICI (53%) and 23/85 with RAF/MEK inhibitors (27%). Most common treatment indication were dermatological (39/85, 45.9%), hematologic (17/85, 20%), urological (13/85, 15.3%) and head and neck (11/85, 12.9%) cancers. Before treatment, the majority of patients were stratified as low-risk (31/85) or moderate-risk (32/85), and 22/85 (25.9%) as high-risk. 7/85 (8.2%) patients were newly diagnosed with cardiovascular disease at baseline visit, resulting in a change in risk category and subsequent initiation of cardiovascular treatment. This includes 3 patients who had been initially categorized as low-risk and would not have been referred for further cardiac workup due to current guideline recommendations. The six months follow up visit has been completed in 44/85 patients. Among these, 1/20 patients (5%) with ICI developed a perimyocarditis and 2/11 patients (18.2%) with BTK inhibitors developed atrial fibrillation. 1/13 patients (7.7%) with RAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, classified as low-risk at baseline, developed asymptomatic CTRCD, which resolved after initiation of cardioprotective drug therapy. Conclusion This interim analysis of the RECENT registry indicates benefit of a structured baseline cardiac assessment prior to cancer treatment in all patients, irrespective of the initial risk stratification. Contrary to current guidelines, which recommend routine echocardiographic monitoring in patients receiving RAF/MEK inhibitors only in high-risk patients, the current data advocate for extending this also to low-risk patients to detect subclinical deterioration of the cardiovascular status.

Real-World Use and Outcomes of Apixaban for Early Post-Surgical Fontan Thromboprophylaxis.

Patients with Fontan physiology are at heightened risk of thrombosis related to passive venous return leading to increased stasis, as well as acquired thrombophilia from congestive hepatopathy. Variability exists for post-Fontan thromboprophylaxis, with no consensus on best practices. Direct oral anticoagulants offer advantages over conventional anticoagulants including fewer drug-drug interactions, no dietary restrictions, and less frequent monitoring. Herein, we report our single center experience utilizing apixaban thromboprophylaxis in children post-Fontan procedure. Single center, retrospective, cohort study evaluating apixaban thromboprophylaxis dosing strategies, efficacy, and safety in children admitted post-Fontan procedure at Boston Children's Hospital. Between September 2019 and December 2023, 62 children, median age 3.2years (2.1-10.5years), weight 13.9kg (9.5-56.3kg) received apixaban at a median of 93days post-Fontan (7-1421days). Over a total of 93days of apixaban exposure, there was 1 treatment-related thrombosis event (0.07 per 1000 person-days on apixaban) and 3 combined treatment-related clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) and major bleeding events (0.22 per 1000 person-days on apixaban). Apixaban for post-Fontan thromboprophylaxis was feasible with low rates of bleeding and thrombosis.

Palbociclib in Solid Tumor Patients With Genomic Alterations in the cyclinD-cdk4/6-INK4a-Rb Pathway: Results From National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Trial Arm I (APEC1621I).

The National Cancer Institute-Children's Oncology Group Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice trial assigned patients age 1-21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase II treatment arms of molecularly targeted therapies on the basis of genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Patients with tumors that harbored prespecified genomic alterations in the cyclinD-CDK4/6-INK4a-Rb pathway with intact Rb expression were assigned and treated with the cdk4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Patients received palbociclib orally once daily for 21 days of 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or up to 2 years. The primary end point was objective response rate; secondary end points included safety/tolerability and progression-free survival. Twenty-three patients (median age, 15 years; range, 8-21) were enrolled; 20 received protocol therapy and were evaluable for toxicity and response. Of the evaluable patients, the most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n = 9) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 6). A single actionable gene amplification was found in 19 tumors (CDK4, n = 11, CDK6, n = 2, CCND3, n = 6), with one tumor harboring two amplifications (CDK4 and CCND2). Hematologic toxicities were the most common treatment-related events. No objective responses were seen. Two patients with tumors harboring CDK4 amplifications (neuroblastoma and sarcoma) had best response of stable disease for six and three cycles. Six-month progression was 10% (95% CI, 1.7 to 27.2). The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib at 75 mg/m2 orally daily was tolerable in this heavily pretreated cohort. No objective responses were observed in this histology-agnostic biomarker-selected population with treatment-refractory solid tumors, demonstrating that pathway alteration alone is insufficient in pediatric cancers to generate a response to palbociclib monotherapy.

Learning implementation of a guideline based decision support system to improve hypertension treatment in primary care in China: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in improving the use of guideline accordant antihypertensive treatment in primary care settings in China.DesignPragmatic, open label, cluster randomised...

Phase II trial of BXCL701 and pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (EXPEL-PANC): Preliminary findings.

LBA4132 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited therapeutic options and is thought to be a “cold” tumor that does not respond to immunotherapy, due to a tumor microenvironment (TME) consisting of a desmoplastic stroma and poor T cell infiltrate. BXCL701 is an oral synthetic dipeptide that competitively inhibits dipeptidyl peptidases DPP4, DPP8, DPP9 and fibroblast activation protein (FAP). BXCL701 exerts antitumor activity via inhibition of DPP8/9, which is associated with induction of proinflammatory cytokines, as well as inhibition of FAP, which disrupts tumor-stromal interactions. Preclinical xenograft models demonstrate synergy between BXCL701 and PD-1 blockade, reducing tumor growth and promoting an increase in intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, macrophages and NK cells, with induction of host-protective immunity. Methods: This is a phase II trial of BXCL701 in patients with metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) following progression on 1 line of treatment for advanced disease and amenable to serial biopsies. BXCL701 is administered at 0.2 mg PO BID days 1-7 and 0.3 mg BID days 8-14 during cycle 1 (21 days) followed by 0.3 mg BID days 1-14 every 21 days in all other cycles, given with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 21 days (all cycles). The primary objective is to determine the 18-week progression-free survival rate (PFS18weeks). We estimate that historical 2nd-line PFS18weeks is 30% or less; using a Simon’s two-stage (minimax) design, a type I error rate of 0.05 and power of 80% if the true rate is 50%, we will need 19 patients in stage 1 and 20 in stage 2 (39 total). There is a safety lead-in phase of 6 patients. We plan to enroll 43 patients to account for a predicted 10% drop out of unevaluable patients. Correlative pharmacodynamic studies include imaging mass cytometry to examine 36 markers of the PDAC TME in tissue biopsies, as well as blood-based analyses of KRAS circulating tumor DNA, circulating markers of fibrosis, and IL-6. Enrollment began in Q3 2023 (NCT05558982). Results: Six patients have enrolled, 3 women and 3 men, median age 57.5 (range 37-80). One patient was progression-free at 18 weeks and 1 patient had stable disease (SD) at 9 weeks, not yet evaluable for the 18-week landmark. Objective response rate is 16% and disease control rate is 50% (RECIST: 1 partial response, -41%, and 2 patients with SD, -18% and 0%). Three patients had significant reductions in CA19-9 from baseline (-100%, -73%, and -97%). Median PFS and overall survival have not been reached (NR, 95% CI 1.45 months-NR and 0.92 months-NR, respectively). There have been no serious treatment-related safety events. The safety lead-in will complete after the next patient completes the 6-week safety window (1 patient was unevaluable). Conclusions: BXCL701 plus pembrolizumab is well-tolerated and shows early signs of potential clinical activity in patients with mPDAC refractory to chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT05558982 .

Impact of cemiplimab treatment duration on clinical outcomes in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Treatment duration with checkpoint inhibitors must be optimized to prevent unjustified toxicity, but evidence for the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is lacking. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the survival of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) who discontinued cemiplimab due to different causes and without progression. Among 95 patients with CSCC who received cemiplimab, 22 (23%) patients discontinued immunotherapy due to causes other than progression, such as comorbidities, toxicity, complete response or lack of compliance (group that discontinued before censoring [DBC]), then 73 patients had standard treatment scheduled (STS). The overall survival was 25.2 months (95% CI: 8.9–29.4) in STS group and 28.3 months (95% CI: 12.7–28.3) in the DBC group; deaths for all causes were 11/22 (50%) in the DBC group and 34/73 (46.6%) in the STS group (p = 0.32). 10/22 (45.4%) subjects died due to CSCC in the DBC after discontinuation and 34/73 (46.6%) in the STS group, and the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.230). Duration of treatment was significantly lower in subjects with stable disease versus those with complete or partial response (16.9, 30.6 and 34.9 months, respectively; p = 0.004). Among the 22 STS patients, 12 received cemiplimab for less than 12 months (10 [83%] died) and 10 for at least 12 months (1 [10%] died). Our observation, finding no outcome difference between DBC and STS groups, suggests that ICI treatment after one year might expose patients to further treatment related events without efficacy advantages.Graphical abstract

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colon Cancer

BackgroundMismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) tumors can be found in 10 to 15% of patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. In these patients, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. The use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising results, but data from studies of this approach are limited.MethodsWe conducted a phase 2 study in which patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced, previously untreated dMMR colon cancer were treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The two primary end points were safety, defined by timely surgery (i.e., ≤2-week delay of planned surgery owing to treatment-related toxic events), and 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary end points included pathological response and results of genomic analyses.ResultsOf 115 enrolled patients, 113 (98%; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 93 to 100) underwent timely surgery; 2 patients had surgery delayed by more than 2 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 5 patients (4%), and none of the patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Among the 111 patients included in the efficacy analysis, a pathological response was observed in 109 (98%; 95% CI, 94 to 100), including 105 (95%) with a major pathological response (defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor) and 75 (68%) with a pathological complete response (0% residual viable tumor). With a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 9 to 65), no patients have had recurrence of disease.ConclusionsIn patients with locally advanced dMMR colon cancer, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab had an acceptable safety profile and led to a pathological response in a high proportion of patients. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; NICHE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03026140.)

Assessing the Impact of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in CT Angiography on Patient Diagnosis and Outcomes (IDEAL Study)—a protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThis multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to assess the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model on the efficacy of intracranial aneurysm detection in CT angiography (CTA) and its influence on patients’ short-term and long-term outcomes.MethodsStudydesign: Prospective, multicenter, double-blinded RCT.Settings: The model was designed for the automatic detection of intracranial aneurysms from original CTA images.Participants: Adult inpatients and outpatients who are scheduled for head CTA scanning.Randomization groups:(1) Experimental Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the True-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (True-AI arm).(2) Control Group: Head CTA interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of the Sham-AI-integrated intracranial aneurysm diagnosis strategy (Sham-AI arm).Randomization: Block randomization, stratified by center, gender, and age group.Primary outcomes: Coprimary outcomes of superiority in patient-level sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity for the True-AI arm to the Sham-AI arm in intracranial aneurysms.Secondary outcomes: Diagnostic performance for other intracranial lesions, detection rates, workload of CTA interpretation, resource utilization, treatment-related clinical events, aneurysm-related events, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness analysis.Blinding: Study participants and participating radiologists will be blinded to the intervention.Sample size: Based on our pilot study, the patient-level sensitivity is assumed to be 0.65 for the Sham-AI arm and 0.75 for the True-AI arm, with specificities of 0.90 and 0.88, respectively. The prevalence of intracranial aneurysms for patients undergoing head CTA in the hospital is approximately 12%. To establish superiority in sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity with a margin of 5% using a one-sided α = 0.025 to ensure that the power of coprimary endpoint testing reached 0.80 and a 5% attrition rate, the sample size was determined to be 6450 in a 1:1 allocation to True-AI or Sham-AI arm.DiscussionThe study will determine the precise impact of the AI system on the detection performance for intracranial aneurysms in a double-blinded design and following the real-world effects on patients’ short-term and long-term outcomes.Trial registrationThis trial has been registered with the NIH, U.S. National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT06118840. Registered 11 November 2023.

Mosunetuzumab with polatuzumab vedotin: Subgroup analyses in patients (pts) with primary refractory or early relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).

7021 Background: The primary analysis of mosunetuzumab with polatuzumab vedotin (mosun-pola) in the Phase Ib/II study (NCT03671018) demonstrated durable responses and manageable safety in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R), transplant-ineligible LBCL (Budde et al. Nat Med 2023). Here, we present results for primary refractory (refr) or early relapse (rel) subgroups from this study after a median follow-up of 23.9 months. Methods: Pts with R/R LBCL (diffuse LBCL not otherwise specified [NOS], high-grade B-cell lymphoma [HGBCL], transformed follicular lymphoma (FL), and FL grade 3b) and who received ≥1 prior line of therapy (including an anti-CD20 antibody) were treated with mosun-pola. Refr was defined as SD, PD, PR, or CR with relapse <3 months after first-line (1L) therapy. Rel was defined as CR with relapse ≥3 and ≤12 months after 1L therapy. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) by IRC using Lugano 2014 response criteria. Key secondary endpoints included CR rate, duration of response (DOR), duration of CR (DOCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: As of July 6, 2023, of the 98 pts in the overall population, 45 (46%) and 27 (28%) pts had refr or rel LBCL, respectively. At baseline, the median age in the refr and rel subgroups was 68 and 70 years respectively; 23/45 pts (51%) and 6/27 pts (22%) were treated with mosun-pola as second-line, respectively. The majority of refr/rel pts had DLBCL NOS (71%; 78%) or HGBCL (24%; 19%), Ann Arbor stage III/IV (80%; 89%), elevated LDH (55%; 48%), and extranodal involvement (67%; 59%). In refr pts, the ORR was 49%, which was generally consistent with the overall population (59%); although the sample size was limited, higher responses (ORR: 74%) were observed in rel pts. Additional clinical outcomes are reported (Table). The safety profile was consistent with the overall population. Grade 3 CRS occurred in one pt in each subgroup. Treatment-related ICANS-like events occurred in 2/45 pts (4%; refr) and 3/27 pts (11%; rel). Conclusions: Mosun-pola demonstrated durable benefits in ORR and CR rates irrespective of a poor response to 1L treatment. Outcomes for pts with refr or rel LBCL are encouraging. Clinical trial information: NCT03671018 . [Table: see text]

Ultra-hypofractionated adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer (UK FAST-Forward trial): A real life scenario analysis in a developing country.

e12501 Background: Selected patients showed non-inferior outcomes after conservative surgery for early breast cancer in the FAST-Forward UK (26Gy in 5 fractions) when compared to standard to date treatment. This study triggered an important change in radiation therapy routines across the world. We aimed to establish a pattern of treatment related events at a third-world country cancer center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated with 26Gy in 5 fractions (1 week) from January 2020 to June 2023. All data was exported and analyzed for demographics. A clinical profile was traced, dosimetric parameters and side effects assessed based on individual inquiries to each patient, per and post treatment. A strict medical record was kept in order to understand patterns of side effects and results. Results: 101 individuals were identified. Mean age was 64 years, 48 (47%) patients experienced radiation dermatitis of any grade, 33 (32%) grade 1, 9 (8%) grade 2, 6 grade 3 or 4 (5%). Patients older than 60 years showed to be a significant factor for dermatitis development (34 over a total of 48 - 70%) and 8 (53%) over 15 had grade 2 or higher dermatitis. 27 (26%) developed radiation dermatitis during sessions. 21 (20%) took 7 or less days to heal; 27 (26%) had a recovery longer than one week at an average age of 65 years - being the majority of dermatitis grade 1. Reported toxicities were sharp pain 31 (30%), burning pain 24 (23%), edema 17 (16%) and pruritus 5 (4%). At the time of this study was completed, 3 reported deaths (2%) were reported - with a 97% rate of survival. Conclusions: The FAST-Forward trial regimen has 3 years since its publication. Our study shows that in a selected group of breast cancer patients, this novel model has shown to be a safe alternative for adjuvant radiation therapy following breast conservative surgery, results corroborating with published data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single center group analyzed and published.

Health-related quality of life with sacituzumab govitecan in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the phase III TROPiCS-02 trial.

The TROPiCS-02 study (NCT03901339) demonstrated that sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has superior clinical outcomes over treatment of physician's choice (TPC) chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here, we present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) patient-reported outcome (PRO) findings from this study. Eligible adults with HR+/HER2- mBC who previously received a taxane, endocrine-based therapy, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and 2-4 lines of chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC until progression or unacceptable toxicity. PROs were assessed at baseline and on day 1 of each cycle, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), EQ-5D-5L, and PRO Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Compared to TPC, overall least square mean change from baseline was significantly better for SG for physical functioning and dyspnea, but worse for diarrhea. Time to first clinically meaningful worsening or death was significantly longer for SG in global health status/quality of life, physical functioning, fatigue, emotional functioning, dyspnea, insomnia, and financial difficulties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EQ-VAS, but longer for TPC in diarrhea. Few patients in both arms reported experiencing any worsening to level 3 or 4 treatment-related symptomatic events during treatment, as assessed by 16 PRO-CTCAE items, except for diarrhea frequency and amount of hair loss, which favored TPC. SG was associated with an HRQoL benefit in most symptoms and functioning, compared with TPC. This supports the favorable profile of SG as a treatment option for patients with pretreated HR+/HER2- mBC.

Case report: NSCLC with pulmonary embolism after treatment with almonertinib

Rationale: Almonertinib is the first independently developed third generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in China. It can be used not only for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutation patients but also for T790M (+) resistant patients, and has better safety and survivability compared to the first and second generation EGFR-TKIs. The previous literature and case studies have reported significant treatment-related adverse reactions in non-small cell lung cancers patients treated with almonertinib, including elevated blood creatine phosphatase, prolonged cardiac QT interval, altered myocardial contractility, interstitial lung disease, eye disease, and hematological events. But there are few individual reports of pulmonary embolism events. Patient concerns: A 55-year-old female with no history of smoking visited a local hospital with mild cough and lower sacrococcygeal pain without obvious cause. Diagnosis: She was diagnosed with right lung adenocarcinoma with multiple bone metastases (T2bN1M1c, stage IVB) after image and histological examination, with EGFR 21 exon L858R sensitive mutation. Interventions: She initially underwent surgical treatment due to the discovery of a sacral tumor, and the pathology of the surgery indicated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Genetic testing results showed EGFR 21 exon L858R sensitive mutation. Combined with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging results and sacral tumor surgical pathology results, it was considered that the patient had lung adenocarcinoma with multiple bone metastases. Treatment plan: targeted treatment with almonertinib which is the third-generation EGFR-TKIs. After only 1 month of targeted treatment, chest enhanced computed tomography revealed pulmonary embolism imaging, combined with coagulation indicators, considering pulmonary embolism. As the thromboembolic site is located at the end of the pulmonary artery branch and imaging shows that tumor lesions are stable. Consider continuing targeted treatment with almonertinib and adjuvant oral anticoagulant therapy with rivaroxaban for treatment. Outcomes: Two months later, the patient’s condition was followed up and it was found that the imaging manifestations of pulmonary embolism disappeared, but the coagulation indicators remained in a hypercoagulable state. The patient’s treatment plan remained unchanged, and the patient was hospitalized for follow-up every 6 to 8 weeks to closely observe changes in the condition. Lessons: There are many reasons for the occurrence of hypercoagulable blood in tumor patients, and there are very few reports of treatment-related pulmonary embolism events in patients who are treated with almonertinib targeted therapy. It is particularly important to determine whether the hypercoagulable blood in such patients is related to targeted therapy drugs in clinical practice, as this will affect the clinical benefits of patients in epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment and the clinical indicators which need to pay more attention in follow-up observation, to avoid serious pulmonary embolism events and thus affect the patient’s survival status and quality of life.

Abstract PO5-22-05: ULTRA-HYPOFRACTIONATED ADJUVANT RADIATION THERAPY FOR BREAST CANCER (UK FAST FORWARD TRIAL): A REAL LIFE SCENARIO ANALYSIS IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY

Abstract Introduction: Selected patients showed non-inferior outcomes after conservative surgery for early breast cancer in the FAST-Forward UK (26Gy in 5 fractions) when compared to standard to date treatment. This study triggered an important change in radiation therapy routines across the world. We aimed to establish a pattern of treatment related events at a third-world country cancer center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated with 26Gy in 5 fractions (1 week) from January 2020 to June 2023. All data was exported and analyzed for demographics. A clinical profile was traced, dosimetric parameters and side effects assessed based on individual inquiries to each patient, per and post treatment. A strict medical record was kept in order to understand patterns of side effects and results. Results: 101 individuals were identified. Mean age was 64 years, 48 (47%) patients experienced radiation dermatitis of any grade, 33 (32%) grade 1, 9 (8%) grade 2, 6 grade 3 or 4 (5%). Patients older than 60 years showed to be a significant factor for dermatitis development (34 over a total of 48 - 70%) and 8 (53%) over 15 had grade 2 or higher dermatitis. 27 (26%) developed radiation dermatitis during sessions. 21 (20%) took 7 or less days to heal; 27 (26%) had a recovery longer than one week at an average age of 65 years - being the majority of dermatitis grade 1. Reported toxicities were sharp pain 31 (30%), burning pain 24 (23%), edema 17 (16%) and pruritus 5 (4%). At the time of this study was completed, 3 reported deaths (2%) were reported - with a 97% rate of survival. Conclusions: The fast forward trial regimen has 3 years since its publication. Our study shows that in a selected group of breast cancer patients, this novel model has shown to be a safe alternative for adjuvant radiation therapy following breast conservative surgery, results corroborating with published data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single center group analyzed and published. Citation Format: Renne Bart, Daniel Przybysz, Ramon Ferrari, Leonardo Franco, Carlos Almeida, Paulo Canary. ULTRA-HYPOFRACTIONATED ADJUVANT RADIATION THERAPY FOR BREAST CANCER (UK FAST FORWARD TRIAL): A REAL LIFE SCENARIO ANALYSIS IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-22-05.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Data from literature review and a real-world analysis.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is supported by increasing data, but the sample size is limited, and the findings are not completely consistent. We conducted a real-world study and a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NCIT in locally advanced ESCC. We retrospectively assessed the outcomes of patients with locally advanced ESCC who completed NICT and subsequent esophagectomy at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022, including pathological complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates, disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), 1-year recurrence rate, R0 resection rate and adverse events. Moreover, a meta-analysis of 27 published literatures was also conducted for comparison. In the analysis, 128 patients were studied, with 25% achieving pCR, 46.1% MPR, and 99.2% R0 resection. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 91.41% (95% CI: 85.15%-95.63%), 75.00% (95% CI: 66.58%-82.23%) and 64.84% (95% CI: 55.91%-73.07%).ORR and DCR were 31.2% (95% CI: 23.31-39.99) and 64.1% (95% CI: 55.15%-72.38%), and the 1-year recurrence rate was 26.7% (95% CI: 22.5%-38.1%). Treatment-related events occurred in 96.1% but were acceptable. In a meta-analysis of 27 studies with 1734 patients, pooled rates for pCR, MPR, ORR, DCR, and R0 resection were 29%, 52%, 71%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, with a 1-year recurrence rate of 12%. NCIT is safe and provides potential survival benefits for patients with locally advanced ESCC. However, randomized phase 3 trial data is still needed.

The Cost-Effectiveness of an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Compared to Standard Management of Type 1 Diabetes in a Singapore Setting.

Background: Despite advances in technology, glycemic outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) remain suboptimal. The MiniMed 780G (MM780G) advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system is the latest technology for T1D management with established safety and efficacy. This study explores the cost-effectiveness of MM780G AHCL compared against multiple daily injections (MDI) plus intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitor (isCGM). Methods: A cost-utility analysis was conducted, simulating lifetime outcomes for 1000 T1D individuals, with baseline hemoglobin A1c of 8.4%, using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM) v9.5. A Singapore health care payer perspective was taken with 2023 costs applied. Treatment effects were taken from the ADAPT study and treatment-related events from a combination of sources. T1D complication costs were derived from local literature, and health state utilities and disutilities from published literature. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) explored uncertainty. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds set to Singapore Dollars (SGD) 45,000 (United States Dollars [USD] 33,087) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and Singapore's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of SGD 114,165 (USD 83,941) per QALY. Results: A switch from MDI plus isCGM to MM780G resulted in expected gains in life-years (+0.78) and QALYs (+1.45). Cost savings through reduction in T1D complications (SGD 25,465; USD 18,723) partially offset the higher treatment costs in the AHCL arm (+SGD 74,538; +USD 54,805), resulting in an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SGD 33,797 (USD 24,850) per QALY gained. Findings were robust, with PSA outputs indicating 81% and 99% probabilities of cost-effectiveness at the stated WTP thresholds. Conclusion: MM780G is a cost-effective option for people with T1D managed in a Singapore setting.

Treatment-related cardiovascular events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Evidence from real-world data with a competing risks approach.

Understanding cancer treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) events is important for cancer care; however, comprehensive evaluation of CV events in patients with lung cancer is limited. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence and associated risks of various CV event types in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 7868 individuals aged 40years and older, recently diagnosed with NSCLC (2007-2018), were assessed with data obtained from the National Cancer Center, Korea. This study included nine types of CV events. A 2-year cumulative incidence function (CIF) of CV events was estimated, with death as a competing event. The associated risks were assessed by subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) in the Fine-Gray competing risks model. CV events were observed in 7.8% of patients with NSCLC, with the most frequently observed types being atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF) (2.7%), venous thromboembolic disease (2.0%), and cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) (1.5%). Overall, all CV events were highest in the group treated with systemic therapy (CIF, 10.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5%-11.8%), followed by those treated with surgery (CIF, 10.0%; 95% CI, 8.6%-11.6%); the incidence of AF (CIF, 5.7%; 95% CI, 4.6%-7.0%) was highest in patients treated with surgery. Individuals treated with systemic therapy were found to exhibit a higher CeVD risk than those treated with surgery (sHR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.66-10.23). Among the patients who underwent surgery, those with lobectomy and pneumonectomy had a higher AF risk (vs. wedge resection/segmentectomy; sHR, 7.79; 95% CI, 1.87-32.42; sHR, 8.10; 95% CI, 1.60-40.89). These findings revealed treatment-related CV event risks in patients with NSCLC, which suggests that the risk of AF in surgery and CeVD in systemic therapy should be paid more attention to achieve a better prognosis and improve cancer survivorship outcomes. Atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF) is the most common cardiovascular event, particularly at a high risk in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing surgery. Patients receiving surgery with poor performance status, diagnosed with regional stage, and undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy are at a high risk of AF. Systemic/radiotherapy is associated with cerebrovascular and ischemic heart disease in patients with NSCLC.

Abstract C020: First-in-human phase 1/1b trial of the first-in-class bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitor RMC-5552 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract Activation of the mTOR pathway plays a role in the oncogenesis and progression of many cancer types, and is frequently co-altered in RAS-driven tumors. First-generation mTORC1-selective inhibitors were limited by incomplete inhibition of 4EBP1 phosphorylation, while second-generation pan-mTOR inhibitors had a low therapeutic index due to mTORC2-mediated toxicity such as hyperglycemia. RMC-5552 is a first-in-class third-generation bi-steric mTOR inhibitor that is mTORC1-selective via its FKBP12-binding moiety and potently inhibits phosphorylation of the 4EBP1 tumor suppressor via a linked ATP-competitive moiety, addressing these key limitations of prior mTOR inhibitors in preclinical models. RMC-5552 is being investigated in a Phase I/Ib study (NCT04774952). Eligible patients (pts) were ≥18 yrs old with ECOG 0-1 and had advanced solid tumors that had failed or were ineligible for standard-of-care treatments. Pts received RMC-5552 as a weekly infusion. To address mucositis, a common toxicity in pts treated with mTOR inhibitors, pts prophylactically used dexamethasone mouthwash either alone or with tacrolimus mouthwash (TM), which binds to the RMC-5552 presenter protein FKBP12. Objectives included assessment of safety/tolerability (CTCAEv5), defining the maximum tolerated and recommended Phase 2 doses, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy (RECIST v1.1). As of June 12, 2023, 47 pts have been evaluated at 6 dose levels from 1.6 mg to 12 mg. The most common (> 20%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAE, any grade) were stomatitis/mucositis (45%), fatigue (40%), nausea (38%), decreased appetite (32%), and vomiting (23%). Treatment-related events of hyperglycemia occurred in 4% of pts (both grade 2) and were not dose limiting. The most common grade 3 TRAE at dose levels ≥6 mg was mucositis/stomatitis, which was dose-dependent and limited tolerability in the absence of TM. Between 8 and 12 mg, the rate of treatment related stomatitis/mucositis was 65% (15% grade 3) in pts treated without TM (N = 20) versus 30% (no grade 3) in pts treated with TM (N = 10). TM prophylaxis enabled dose escalation beyond dose levels previously considered intolerable due to mucositis (10-12 mg; escalation ongoing), and unbound plasma exposures at 8-12 mg were within the range that induced significant anti-tumor activity in preclinical models. The disease control rate was 67% among efficacy evaluable pts (N = 39). One pt with a salivary gland tumor harboring a PTEN mutation had a confirmed partial response (PR) with 78% reduction and 16 months duration of response. In addition, molecular responses of circulating tumor DNA were observed in pts with mTOR pathway variants. Updated efficacy results will be presented. These early data indicate that RMC-5552 monotherapy is tolerated at doses predicted to be efficacious, and that selective inhibition of mTORC1 alleviates mTORC2-mediated toxicity. Dose escalation is ongoing, and mucositis prophylaxis has enabled further dose intensification for future combination studies with RAS(ON) inhibitors. Citation Format: Alison M Schram, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Eric B Haura, Jonathan W Riess, Susanna V Ulahannan, Sai-Hong I Ou, Anna Capasso, Pamela N Munster, Michael L Cheng, W Clay Gustafson, Bojena Bitman, Sumit Kar, Zhican Wang, Lin Tao, Justin G Meyerowitz, Howard A Burris. First-in-human phase 1/1b trial of the first-in-class bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitor RMC-5552 in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C020.

Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and PRP and combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectiveThere are many injectable treatments for knee osteoarthritis with different characteristics and effects, the aim is to understand which one can lead to better and safer results.MethodsThe PRISMA principles were followed when doing the literature search. Web of Science databases, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and the Wanfang database were searched to identified randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of corticosteroids (CSC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), and combination therapy in treating KOA. Risk of bias was assessed using the relevant Cochrane tools (version 1.0). The outcome measure included the visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, and treatment-related adverse events. The network meta-analysis was performed using STATA17 software and a Bayesian stratified random effects model.ResultsNetwork meta-analysis using the Bayesian random-effects model revealed 35 studies with 3104 participants. PRP showed the best WOMAC score at a 3-month follow-up, followed by PRP + HA, HA, placebo, and CSC; PRP + HA scored the highest VAS, followed by PRP, CSC, HA, and placebo. PRP, CSC, HA, and placebo had the highest WOMAC scores six months following treatment; PRP + HA showed the best VAS scores. PRP showed the best WOMAC score at 12 months, followed by PRP + HA, HA, placebo, and CSC; The best VAS score was obtained with PRP, followed by PRP + HA, HA, and CSC. No therapy demonstrated a rise in adverse events linked to the treatment in terms of safety.ConclusionsThe current study found that PRP and PRP + HA were the most successful in improving function and alleviating pain after 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. CSC, HA, PRP, and combination therapy did not result in an increase in the incidence of treatment-related side events as compared to placebo.

Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Inhibitor INCB057643 (LIMBER-103) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis and Other Advanced Myeloid Neoplasms: A Phase 1 Study

Introduction: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that regulate expression of critical oncoproteins involved in the pathophysiology of myelofibrosis (MF) and other hematologic malignancies including B-lymphoma-2, nuclear factor kappa, and c-Myc. In a previous phase 1/2 clinical trial, the small-molecule oral BET inhibitor INCB057643, evaluated as monotherapy and in combination with ruxolitinib, was associated with favorable tolerability and encouraging clinical activity in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: This ongoing phase 1, 3+3 dose-escalation/expansion study (NCT04279847) is evaluating the safety and tolerability of INCB057643 (4 mg once daily [qd] with escalation up to 12 mg qd) in patients aged ≥18 years as (1) monotherapy (part 1) in relapsed or refractory (R/R) MF, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes (MDS/MPN) or (2) added to ruxolitinib (part 2) in patients with MF and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib. The primary endpoints are safety and tolerability, including identification of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints in patients with MF include spleen volume response (≥35% reduction from baseline at Week 24 per magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scan) and symptom response (≥50% reduction from baseline at Week 24 in MPN-Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score [MPN-SAF TSS]). Results: As of data cutoff on June 1, 2023, 14 patients were treated in part 1 (4 mg, n=6; 8 mg, n=4; 10 mg, n=2; 12 mg, n=2), and 6 were treated in part 2 (4 mg, n=3, 6 mg, n=3). In part 1, patients had a median (range) age of 69.5 (50.0-79.0) years and a median (range) study treatment duration of 177 (9-375) days; 8 were men. In part 2, patients had a median (range) age of 71 (64-76) years; median (range) study treatment duration of 92.5 (46-274) days; 3 were men. 16 patients had MF; 4 had MDS/MPN, including 1 with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. A total of 10 patients discontinued treatment, 4 for lack of efficacy or disease progression and 4 due to adverse events (AEs; 3 in the monotherapy group, 1 in the combination group). Thrombocytopenia (n=3) and anemia/thrombocytopenia (n=1) were the only treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) leading to discontinuation, and thrombocytopenia was the most common TEAE (n=11). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurring in ≥1 patient were thrombocytopenia (n=5), anemia (n=4), and hypokalemia (n=2). 12 serious AEs occurred across 5 patients (only COVID-19 occurred in >1 patient [n=2]); all but one serious AE (pneumonia) was considered unrelated to study treatment. There were 2 DLTs: thrombocytopenia in 1 patient with MDS/MPN in the 12 mg cohort and hyperbilirubinemia in 1 patient with MF in the 12 mg cohort. 2 deaths occurred on study, both in the 4 mg monotherapy cohort due to disease progression (MF, n=1; MDS/MPN, n=1). Overall, 5 patients on monotherapy and 2 on combination therapy demonstrated a reduction in spleen volume at Week 12 (≥35% reduction in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively); at Week 24, 3 patients on monotherapy and 2 on combination therapy had a reduction in spleen volume (≥35%: 1 patient and 1 patient, respectively; Figure 1). Percentage change from baseline in MPN-SAF TSS in individual patients is reported in Figure 2; at Week 12, ≥50% improvement from baseline occurred in 3 patients on monotherapy and 1 on combination therapy (≥50% improvement at Week 24: 2 patients and 1 patient). Conclusions: INCB057643 monotherapy (4 and 8 mg qd) and combined (4 and 6 mg qd) with ruxolitinib was generally well tolerated, whereas the 12 mg qd monotherapy dose caused 2 DLTs. There were no treatment-related fatal events. Improvements in spleen size and symptom burden were observed in patients receiving ≥8 mg in the monotherapy group and 4 mg in the combination therapy group. Dose finding (part 1) is ongoing with 10 mg qd, after which the recommended dose(s) for expansion will be declared. Dose escalation is also ongoing in the combination therapy group.

A Window Study of Acalabrutinib & Rituximab, Followed By Chemotherapy & Autograft (ASCT) in Fit Patients with Treatment Naïve Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): First Report of the Investigator-Initiated Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group NHL33 ‘Wamm’ Trial

Introduction Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have improved 1 st line therapy efficacy in elderly (Wang NEJM 2022) and young, fit, MCL-the latter with intermittent dosing during RCHOP in an alternating RCHOP/cytarabine-based regimen (Dreyling Blood 2022). However direct combination of BTKi & intensive chemo is toxic in DLBCL studies. (Kuruvilla Haematol Oncol 2017). The highly selective BTKi, acalabrutinib (A), has proven efficacy and tolerability in relapsed MCL (Wang Lancet 2018). RDHAOx chemotherapy (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, oxaliplatin) prior to ASCT provides a complete response (CR) rate of 77% and favourable toxicity compared to many induction regimens (Le Gouill Blood 2017). Furthermore, Obinutuzumab-DHAP yields undetectable minimum residual disease (MRD) in 85% of young MCL patients. (Le Gouill Haematol Oncol 2019). Here we report the primary endpoint from the Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group phase 2 ‘WAMM’ trial exploring a ‘sandwich’ model of an acalabrutinib-rituximab (AR) ‘window’ before RDHAOx +/- ASCT, followed by fixed-duration AR-maintenance to improve therapy response and minimise additional toxicity. Methods NHL33'WAMM' (ACTRN12619000990123) is a multicentre single-arm phase 2 trial. Key eligibility included: age 18-70 years, untreated histologically-proven stage II-IV MCL, ECOG<2; no contraindications to ASCT or BTKi. Pts received 2 cycles of AR (AR window); ‘A’ dose; 100mg BD PO, ‘R’ dose; 375mg/m 2 IV (day 1) every 4 weeks, followed by RDHAOx x4 cycles. Those with an objective response (CR or partial response-PR) underwent BEAM ASCT (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) then AR maintenance (A; 1yr continuous & R; 3-monthly x 8 cycles). Those who did not undergo BEAM ASCT were able to remain on study and proceed to maintenance AR in the event of ongoing response. Co-primary endpoints (EP) were safety; defined by lack of prohibitive toxicity causing treatment cessation AND PET-determined complete response (CR) rate after AR+RDHAOx. Secondary EP include overall response rates (ORR), toxicity, overall survival (OS) & progression-free survival (PFS), MRD negativity rates and quality of life. Only Grade 3+ toxicity related to acalabrutinib was collected during the ASCT period. Baseline whole exome sequencing was performed to identify mutations, MRD analysis was done by LymphoTrack® Dx and MRD Assay platform (Invivoscribe, Inc) using Illumina® MiSeq. This study was the first Australian blood cancer trial to use telehealth and a ‘hub-and-spoke’ transplant model. Results 44 pts were enrolled from Sept 2020 to Apr 2022 (43 evaluable for the primary endpoint). Baseline characteristics were typical of a young MCL cohort: median age 59 years (Interquartile range 54-64), 77% were male, ECOG was 0-1 in 98%, 84% had stage IV, lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 35%, Ki-67 >30% in 66% and blastoid/pleomorphic histology 9%. TP53 by NGS will be reported at presentation. CR rate post AR+RDHAOx induction was 88%; (95%CI 72-95) with ORR 95% and no prohibitive toxicity. AR window ORR was 93% (CR 57%). MRD negativity was achieved in 18% (7/38) post AR window, and 94% (34/36) post RDHAOx. 43 patients remained evaluable for response after R-DHAOX and pre-maintenance with 35 (80%) who underwent ASCT and 38 (86%) who commenced AR maintenance; 7 remain on maintenance. Response in specific subgroups will be reported at the meeting. At data lock, 35 pts (81%) experienced ≥1 G3+ adverse events during induction or maintenance phases, most common were neutropenia (58% of pts), febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (25%), diarrhea (14%). No G5 treatment-related events have occurred to date. There have been 22 SAEs, most common were COVID (3), febrile neutropenia (2) and fever (2). 5 deaths have been reported: 4 in pts with progressive disease and 1 COVID pneumonitis during AR maintenance. After a median follow up of 22 months (range 17-28m), the 2-year OS was 89%. Analysis of survival, quality of life and biomarkers will be reported with more mature follow up. Conclusion AR delivered in a sandwich approach is active and safe. An AR window yields a high ORR and compared to historical studies, improves post-chemo induction CR rates and MRD negativity. A telehealth model allowed rapid recruitment in a rare cancer.