Treatment-related Adverse Events Of Grade Research Articles

Abstract PO2-05-01: Famitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with dalpicilib and fulvestrant in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrinotherapy (ET) represent an essential part of the treatment for HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). However, the role of angiogenesis inhibitors, such as bevacizumab, in these patients (pts) is controversial. While it has been demonstrated to improve progression-free survival (PFS), it has failed to show a significant overall survival (OS) benefit in HER2-negative BC. Several preclinical studies have explored the combination of anti-angiogenesis multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and CDK4/6 inhibitors in other cancers, suggesting a synergistic effect. Our phase Ib/II trial (NCT05176080, ChiCTR2100053950) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel anti-angiogenesis TKI famitinib (F) added to dalpiciclib (D) and ET in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative BC. Here we report the results of Phase Ib. Methods: A 3+3 de-escalation design was used in this dose-exploring phase (phase Ib). Pts with HR-positive and HER2-negative BC, who had no more than two prior chemotherapies in the advanced setting, were enrolled and administered F (orally, at doses of 15 mg/d, 10 mg/d, or 15 mg qod), D (orally, at doses of 150, 125 or 100 mg/d, 21 days on and 7 days off) and fulvestrant (intramuscularly, at a fixed dose of 500 mg every four weeks) until progression, unaccepted toxicities, or withdrawal. The initial dose level (Level 1) was set as F 15 mg daily and D 150 mg/d. The primary endpoints were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and safety. Results: From December 2021 to June 2022, 18 pts were enrolled, and 3, 6, 3, and 6 pts were assigned to Level 1 (F 15 mg + D 150 mg), Level 2 (F 10 mg + D 125 mg), Level 3 (F 15 mg qod + D 125 mg), and Level 4 (F 10 mg + D 100 mg), respectively. 14 (77.8%) pts had visceral metastasis, and 7 (38.9%) had prior systemic therapies in the advanced setting. 13 (72.2%) pts had received ET, and 11 (61.1%) were resistant to ET before enrolled. A total of 6 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, including 3 Grade 4 thrombopenia (2 in Level 1, 1 in Level 2) and 3 Grade 4 neutropenia (2 in Level 3, 1 in Level 4), 4 of which were serious adverse events (AEs). The most common (≥20%) treatment-related AEs of Grade 3 or above were neutropenia (100.0%), leukopenia (88.9%), thrombocytopenia (33.3%), anemia (27.8%), lymphopenia and hypertension (both 22.2%). No death was reported. Overall 10 pts (55.6%) achieved confirmed partial responses and 16 (88.9%) achieved clinical benefits. Confirmed objective response rates (ORRs), clinical benefit rates (CBRs), and DLTs in different dose levels were shown in Table 1. Considering the efficacy and safety profiles, Level 4 was selected as RP2D. Conclusion: The anti-angiogenesis multi-targeted receptor TKI famitinib combined with CDK4/6i and fulvestrant has shown antitumor effects in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative BC, and no new safety signals were observed. Citation Format: Min Yan, Mengwei Zhang, Limin Niu, Huimin Lv, Zhenzhen Liu, Huiai Zeng, Shengnan Zhao, Huihui Sun, Jing Wang, Yajing Feng, Huajun Li. Famitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with dalpicilib and fulvestrant in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-05-01.

Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of different combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsWe obtained relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to May 31, 2023. The analysis of clinical prognostic factors was performed using R 4.2.3 and STATA 15.0. The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events of grade 3–5 severity (Grade ≥3 TRAE). ResultsA total of 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted between 2012 and 2023, involving 7792 patients. These trials evaluated 11 different treatment methods. The results of these trials showed that in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the combination of tislelizumab with chemotherapy and the combination of camrelizumab with chemotherapy were particularly effective. Moreover, when compared with other combination therapies, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy showed superiority in terms of disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). Subgroup analyses further demonstrated that the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS in patients without liver metastasis and in those with brain metastasis. Additionally, carboplatin-based combination therapy was found to confer favorable survival benefits in terms of PFS, while cisplatin-based combination therapy showed the most favorable outcomes in terms of OS. The results of subgroup analyses for overall survival (OS) showed that the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy yielded positive outcomes in specific subgroups. These subgroups were characterized by PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of 50 % or higher, usage of anti-PD-1 medications, age below 65, male gender, smoking history, and non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. Superior effectiveness was demonstrated only in extending the progression-free survival (PFS) of female patients and patients with squamous carcinoma. Meanwhile, other patient cohorts did not show the same level of improvement. ConclusionsTislelizumab, camrelizumab or pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy may be the optimal first-line treatment strategies for NSCLC.

A phase I dose-escalation and -expansion trial of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: SERENA-1 monotherapy results

SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. Parts A and B aim to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant monotherapy and define doses for clinical evaluation. Patients and Methods Women aged 18 years or older with metastatic or recurrent ER+, HER2- breast cancer, refractory (or intolerant) to therapy were assigned 25 mg up to 450 mg once daily (QD; escalation) or 75, 150, or 300 mg QD (expansion). Safety and tolerability, anti-tumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and impact on ESR1m circulating tumor (ct)DNA levels were assessed. By 9 March 2021, 108 patients received camizestrant monotherapy at 25-450 mg doses. Of these, 93 (86.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 82.4% of which were grade 1 or 2. The most common TRAEs were visual effects (56%), (sinus) bradycardia (44%), fatigue (26%), and nausea (15%). There were no TRAEs grade 3 or higher, or treatment-related serious adverse events (TRSAEs) at doses ≤150 mg. Median tmax was achieved ∼2-4 hours post-dose at all doses investigated, with an estimated half-life of 20-23 hours. Efficacy was observed at all doses investigated, including in patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor and/or fulvestrant treatment, with and without baseline ESR1 mutations, and with visceral disease, including liver metastases. Camizestrant is a next-generation oral SERD and pure ER antagonist with a tolerable safety profile. The pharmacokinetics profile supports once-daily dosing, with evidence of pharmacodynamic and clinical efficacy in heavily pre-treated patients, regardless of ESR1m. This study established 75, 150 and 300 mg QD doses for Phase 2 testing (SERENA-2, NCT04214288 and SERENA-3, NCT04588298).

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of PD-1 inhibitor therapy in elderly patients (≥ 65years) with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.

This study aims to determine the clinical features and outcomes of PD-1 inhibitor therapy as the initial treatment in patients aged 65years or older with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The retrospective study conducted a comprehensive analysis of elder patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic ESCC who underwent combined immunochemotherapy in the first affiliated hospital of Nanchang University from January 2019 to January 2023. The main efficacy measures were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of safety was based on the assessment of adverse events (AEs). A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients received PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy including taxane and platinum as the first-line treatment. The median PFS was 6.2months (95% CI: 5.1-7.3), and the median OS was 15.3months (95% CI: 12.9-17.7). The ORR and DCR were 42.0% and 72.7%, correspondingly. 68 (77.3%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of various degrees, with neutrophil count decreased (21, 23.9%) being the most frequent. TRAEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 13 (14.8%) patients. The study demonstrated that individuals older than 65years with locally advanced or metastatic ESCC have a survival benefit from the first-line treatment of PD-1 inhibitors combined therapy, with a manageable safety profile.

Cabozantinib monotherapy for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignancy with poor response to systemic chemotherapy. Mitotane is the only approved therapy for adrenocortical carcinoma. Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor approved in multiple malignancies. This is the first prospective trial to explore the anti-tumour activity, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile of cabozantinib in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. This investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 trial in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma was done at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adrenocortical carcinoma, were not candidates for surgery with curative intent, had measurable disease, had an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 with adequate organ function. Patients who had used mitotane within 6 months of study participation were required to have a serum mitotane level of less than 2 mg/L. Patients were given oral cabozantinib 60 mg daily with the option of dose reduction to manage adverse events. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 4 months, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370718, and is now complete. Between March 1, 2018, and May 31, 2021, we enrolled 18 patients (ten males and eight females), all of whom received at least one dose of study treatment. Of the 18 patients, eight (44%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, nine (50%) patients had a performance status of 1, and one (6%) patient had a performance status of 2. Median follow-up was 36·8 months (IQR 30·2-50·3). At 4 months, 13 (72·2%; 95% CI 46·5-90·3) of 18 patients had progression-free survival and median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI 4·3 to not reached). One patient remains on treatment. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 11 (61%) of 18 patients. The most common grade 3 adverse events were lipase elevation (three [17%] of 18 patients), elevated γ-glutamyl transferase concentrations (two [11%] patients), elevated alanine aminotransferase concentrations (two [11%] patients), hypophosphatemia (two [11%] patients), and hypertension (two [11%] patients). One (6%) of 18 patients had grade 4 hypertension. No treatment related deaths occurred on study. Cabozantinib in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma showed promising efficacy with a manageable and anticipated safety profile. Further prospective studies with cabozantinib alone and in combination with immune checkpoint therapy are ongoing. Exelixis.

Abstract CT196: First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of a macrocyclic ATR inhibitor (ATRN-119) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background: ATRN-119 is an orally bioavailable, potent, selective macrocyclic small molecule inhibitor of Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3- related (ATR) kinase. As the master regulator of DNA damage response (DDR), ATR orchestrates cellular response to DNA replication stress to preserve DNA replication fork integrity. Cancer cells with markedly increased oncogenic stress or dysfunctional DDR are more reliant on ATR for genome stabilization. Thus, inhibition of ATR can result in cancer cell-selective replication fork collapse and cancer cell death. Methods: This ongoing, first-in-human, multi-site phase 1/2a trial (NCT04905914) is investigating ATRN-119 safety and pharmacokinetic properties (primary objectives), preliminary efficacy in various solid tumors (secondary objective), and biomarker profile (exploratory objective). This study uses an open-label, standard 3+3 dose escalation and dose expansion study design. Key inclusion criteria include: advanced solid tumor, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), tumor with at least 1 DDR mutation by next-generation-sequencing, at least 1 failed standard-of-care therapy, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria are cancer therapy within 4 weeks or at least 5 half-lives, unresolved therapy-related AEs, investigational agent within 5 half-lives or 30 days of study drug, CNS metastases or unstable involvement, and concomitant treatment with strong CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 inhibitors or inducers. Results: This trial is currently enrolling at Dose level 5 (550 mg). Among 12 patients in the first four dose levels, the median age is 62 years (range: 48 to 79), where 67% (n=8) are female, 75% (n=9) are White, and 25% (n=3) are Black. The median number of prior treatments is 3 (range: 1 to 6, and 92% have received platinum-based chemotherapy). The majority of tumors, 75% (n=9), had a TP53 mutation. There have been no reports of dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related serious adverse events (AE), and treatment-related AEs Grade 3 or higher in these cohorts. The three most commonly reported all-cause AEs are fatigue (33%, n=4), nausea (25%, n=3), and diarrhea (25%, n=3). Increasing exposure and maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) were observed by dose level. The half-life of ATRN-119 is ~5 hours. Two of 12 patients achieved stable disease (SD): one patient from Dose level 1 (50 mg) who progressed on Day 112 and one patient from Dose level 3 (200 mg) who remains on treatment as of Day 118 (data cut off date: January 2, 2024). Conclusion: In these early cohorts, once-daily oral ATRN-119 appears to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, exhibits near dose proportionality, and demonstrates disease stabilization warranting further investigation. Further studies to explore a twice-daily schedule are being considered. Citation Format: Fiona Simpkins, Amit Mahipal, Patricia LoRusso, Reva Schneider, Crystal Miller, David Stenehjem, Eric J. Brown, Mike Carleton, Joachim Gullbo, Nadeem Q. Mirza. First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of a macrocyclic ATR inhibitor (ATRN-119) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT196.

Toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC); however, the toxicity profiles are inconclusive. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs for R/M HNSCC were searched from online databases. The characteristics of the studies and the results of incidences of any grade treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment, and specific trAEs were extracted. Twenty studies with 3756 patients were included. The pooled incidences of any grade trAEs, grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment for overall population were 62.07% (95% CI, 59.07%-65.02%), 13.82% (95% CI, 11.23%-16.62%), 0.39% (95% CI, 0.15%-0.71%), 3.99% (95% CI, 2.36%-5.95%), respectively. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors monotherapy and ICIs combination therapy had significantly higher incidences of any grade trAEs (odds ratio [OR], 1.25, 95% CI, 1.05-1.49 and 1.36, 95% CI, 1.15-1.60, respectively), grade three or more trAEs (OR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08-1.84 and 1.79, 95% CI, 1.39-2.30, respectively), trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment (OR, 3.98, 95% CI, 2.06-7.70 and 10.14, 95% CI, 5.49-18.70, respectively) compared with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors monotherapy. ICIs combination therapy had a significantly higher incidence of grade three or more trAEs compared with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy (OR, 1.27, 95% CI, 1.03-1.55); however, the incidences of any grade trAEs and trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment were not significant different. Our study suggests that the incidences of grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, and trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment are low in R/M HNSCC patients treated with ICIs. PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy may be safer compared with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy and ICIs combination therapy.

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin in resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a pilot phase II trial

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has emerged as a potential treatment option for resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this single-arm phase II trial (NCT04826679), patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC (T2‒T4, N0‒N3b, M0) received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with camrelizumab (200 mg), nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2), and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) intravenously on day one of each three-week cycle for three cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR), two-year progression-free survival rate, two-year overall survival rate, and toxicities. Here, we report the perioperative outcomes; survival outcomes were not mature at the time of data analysis. Between April 19, 2021 and March 17, 2022, 48 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant therapy, 27 of whom proceeded to surgical resection and remaining 21 received non-surgical therapy. The ORR was 89.6% (95% CI: 80.9, 98.2) among 48 patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 27 patients who underwent surgery, 17 (63.0%, 95% CI: 44.7, 81.2) achieved a MPR or pCR, with a pCR rate of 55.6% (95% CI: 36.8, 74.3). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in two patients. This study meets the primary endpoint showing potential efficacy of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin, with an acceptable safety profile, in patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC.

Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer

BackgroundNo treatment has surpassed platinum-based chemotherapy in improving overall survival in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.MethodsWe conducted a phase 3, global, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of enfortumab vedotin (at a dose of 1.25 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously on days 1 and 8) and pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg intravenously on day 1) (enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group) or gemcitabine and either cisplatin or carboplatin (determined on the basis of eligibility to receive cisplatin) (chemotherapy group). The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival.ResultsA total of 886 patients underwent randomization: 442 to the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group and 444 to the chemotherapy group. As of August 8, 2023, the median duration of follow-up for survival was 17.2 months. Progression-free survival was longer in the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 12.5 months vs. 6.3 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.54; P<0.001), as was overall survival (median, 31.5 months vs. 16.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.58; P<0.001). The median number of cycles was 12 (range, 1 to 46) in the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group and 6 (range, 1 to 6) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.9% of the patients in the enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab group and in 69.5% of those in the chemotherapy group.ConclusionsTreatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab resulted in significantly better outcomes than chemotherapy in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with a safety profile consistent with that in previous reports. (Funded by Astellas Pharma US and others; EV-302 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04223856.)

First-line treatment with camrelizumab plus famitinib in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%: results from a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial

BackgroundThe combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents can synergistically modulate the tumor microenvironment and represents a promising treatment option. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus...

Cabozantinib plus pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for cisplatin-ineligible advanced urothelial carcinoma (PemCab).

539 Background: Pembrolizumab (pem) was initially approved in the first line setting for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients (pts) with high PD-L1 expression and platinum ineligible pts regardless of PD-L1 status; this later changed to only platinum ineligible pts. There is a high disease progression (PD) rate with pem monotherapy. Cabozantinib (cabo) is a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting MET and VEGFR2 approved in multiple other malignancies as monotherapy or in combination with PD-1 inhibition. We hypothesized that combination of pem and cabo therapy will be safe and efficacious in patients with treatment naïve mUC. Methods: This is a phase II, open label, multi-center, single arm trial evaluating the tolerability and activity of pem 200 mg every 3 weeks and cabo 40 mg daily as first-line treatment for patients with mUC. Key inclusion criteria were histologically proven locally advanced or mUC, ECOG-PS 0-2, cisplatin-ineligible (including patient refusal of cisplatin), treatment naïve, and no prior PD-1/L1 therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). There was a lead-in safety cohort of 6 pts. We hypothesized that combination therapy would improve ORR to &gt; 32%. With 35 evaluable subjects, the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval would extend no more than 26% from the observed proportion. With ≥17 objective responses, the confidence interval excludes 32%. Results: Between December 26, 2018, and April 19, 2023, 36 pts were enrolled of which 35 were evaluable for response with the median follow up of 14.4 months (95% CI 12.2 – 16.2). The median age was 72.5y [range, 47-82]; ECOG PS 0-1 in 89% pts. Responses were observed in 15 pts (ORR= 42.8%) including complete responses in 5 pts (14.3%). Stable disease was seen in 10 pts (28.6%). The disease control rate was 68.5% (25/35). Median PFS was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.2 – 11.2). Fifty-two percent of pts developed any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) attributable to either cabozantinib or pembrolizumab. The most common grade 1/2 TRAE were diarrhea, anorexia, dysgeusia, weight loss, and nausea. Forty-four percent pts developed grade 3/4 TRAEs most common being hypertension, hypophosphatemia, alanine transaminase elevation, diarrhea, and fatigue. Conclusions: This novel phase II trial of pem + cabo demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile and promising efficacy as first-line therapy in mUC including patient’s ineligible for cisplatin. Further investigation with a focus on predictive biomarkers is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03534804 .

A phase Ib/II study of ASKB589 (anti-Claudin 18.2 [CLDN18.2] monoclonal antibody) combined with CAPOX and PD-1 inhibitor as first-line treatment for locally advanced, relapsed and metastatic gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

317 Background: ASKB589 is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody against Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) with high affinity and enhanced antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. We report preliminary safety and efficacy data from an ongoing Phase Ib/II, dose-escalation and expansion study of ASKB589 combined with capecitabine, oxaliplatin(CAPOX) and Sintilimab as first-line treatment of G/GEJ adenocarcinoma (NCT05632939). Methods: The study enrolled G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients(pts) with CLDN18.2 positive expression. The dose-escalation phase used a 3 + 3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In expansion, the dose of ASKB589 selected for expansion was based on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity during escalation phase. Responses were assessed by RECIST 1.1 every 2 cycles (6 weeks). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. In escalation, pts received ASKB589 intravenously (IV) at doses of 6 mg/kg (n = 3) and 10 mg/kg (n = 6) every 3 weeks (Q3W) combined with CAPOX and Sintilimab. In expansion, all pts received ASKB589 IV at a dose of 6 mg/kg. Results: As of July 20, 2023, 9 pts were enrolled in escalation. No DLT was observed and thus the MTD was not identified. 9(100%)pts had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the most common being nausea (77.8%), hypoproteinemia (66.7%), and hyponatremia (55.6%). While the majority of TRAEs were grade 1 or 2, 1 pt (11.1%) had a grade 3 TRAE (decreased neutrophils [10mg/kg]). In expansion, 26 pts with CLDN18.2 moderate-to-high expression (≥2+ membrane staining intensity in ≥40% of tumor cells) were included in the safety set. 24(92.3%) pts had TRAEs, the most common being nausea (65.4%), vomiting (53.8%), hypoproteinemia (53.8%), anemia (50.0%), fatigue (26.9%) and decreased neutrophils (23.1%). 3 pts (11.5%) had TRAEs of grade ≥3 including hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, decreased neutrophils, fatigue and bone marrow suppression. For the 15 evaluable pts who had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment, 12 pts (80.0%) achieved PR for an unconfirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 80.0%. 3 pts (20.0%) had SD for a disease control rate (DCR) of 100.0%. The PK of ASKB589 at doses of 6mg/kg and 10mg/kg combined with CAPOX and anti-PD1 therapy was consistent with that of monotherapy. Conclusions: ASKB589 combined with CAPOX and PD-1 inhibitor has manageable safety and promising antitumor activity. 6mg/kg is chosen as the recommended dose in subsequent studies. Clinical trial information: NCT05632939 .

Camrelizumab plus apatinib and SOX as first-line treatment in patients with alpha-fetoprotein–producing gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A single-arm, multi-center, phase 2 trial.

351 Background: Patients (pts) with AFP-producing G/GEJ adenocarcinoma generally respond poorly to first-line standard chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line camrelizumab plus apatinib given concurrently with chemotherapy, followed by camrelizumab plus apatinib in AFP-producing G/GEJ adenocarcinoma pts. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase 2 trial (NCT04609176), pts with aged ≥18 years, clinical stage III-IV, unresectable/recurrent or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma with no prior systemic therapy, serum AFP &gt; 2×ULN or AFP positive by the IHC staining method were enrolled. Pts received 4 cycles of standard S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) and camrelizumab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus apatinib (250mg, po, qd). Pts without disease progression then continued to receive camrelizumab plus apatinib for up to 24 months, or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1; secondary endpoints included the duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: A total of 36 pts were enrolled and received treatment between Dec 4, 2020 and Aug 4, 2023. 35 pts were evaluable for tumor response. Median age was 63 years (range: 28, 78), with 30 pts (83.3%) were male. 13 pts (36.1%) presented with GEJ. 34 pts (94.5%) were diagnosed with stage IV. 20 pts (55.6%) had distant lymph node involvement, 18 (50.0%) had liver metastasis, 8 (22.2%) had peritoneal metastasis, and 2 (5.6%) had lung metastasis. Median serum AFP level was 739.8 ng/ml (range: 77.7, 321847.0). At data cut-off (Sep 1, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 6.4 months (range: 0.7, 27.0). Efficacy was assessed in the FAS population (n = 36). 2 pts showed complete response (CR, all confirmed), 22 had partial response (PR, 18 confirmed) and 7 had stable disease (SD). In consequent, the unconfirmed ORR was 66.7% (24/36) and DCR was 86.1% (31/36), with a confirmed ORR of 55.6% (20/36). The median PFS and OS were still immature. However, the estimated 12-month PFS rate was 42.1%. Any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 33 pts (91.7%) and grade ≥ 3 in 13 (36.1%) pts. The most common grade ≥ 3 TRAEs were decreased neutrophil count (13.9%), hypertension (8.3%) and diarrhea (5.6%). 16 pts (44.4%) experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade. No new safety signals were reported. Conclusions: In AFP-producing G/GEJ adenocarcinoma pts who had not previously received systemic therapy, camrelizumab plus apatinib with SOX followed by camrelizumab plus apatinib showed promising antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04609176 .

Initial uptake of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in routine clinical practice: Preliminary results of the international DT-real study.

501 Background: HIMALAYA trial showed that durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab; STRIDE) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and that durvalumab (DUR) was non-inferior compared to sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, real world outcomes on this regimen have not been described. Methods: In the context of a prospectively maintained database including 953 patients (pts) with unresectable HCC treated with immunotherapy, we analysed a subgroup of pts treated with STRIDE or DUR across 5 centres in USA, Asia and Europe. We assessed OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 (per investigator) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) per CTCAE v.5.0. Results: Between February and May 2023, 59 pts initiated treatment with STRIDE or DUR (mean age 67.2 years, male sex 81.4%). 33 pts (55.9%) were treated in first-line (1L) and 26 (44.1%) in second- or further-line (&gt;1L). STRIDE regimen was administered in 24 patients (40.7%): 6 pts in 1L, 18 pts in &gt;1L. Child-Pugh class was A in 32 pts (54.2%), being more common in pts treated with STRIDE than DUR (79.2% vs 37.1%, p=0.003). ECOG-PS was 0 in 35 pts (59.3%) and it was more common in pts treated with STRIDE than DUR (79.2% vs 47.0%, p=0.015). Outcomes are reported in Table. After a median follow-up of 3.2 months (95%CI 2.6-3.8), median OS was not reached and 6-month OS rate was 59.4%. In pts treated with STRIDE, median OS was not reached and 6-month OS rate was 95.8%, while median OS was 4.9 months (95%CI 3.2-4.9) for DUR. Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 1.9-3.8) and ORR (evaluable in 43 pts, 72.9%) was 16.3% (95%CI 6.5-33.5%). Any grade TRAEs and grade 3-4 TRAEs were 42.4% (95%CI 27.4-62.5) and 10.2% (95%CI 3.7-22.1%), respectively. TRAEs requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy occurred in 3 pts (5.1%). Conclusions: Preliminary observational data from DT-real confirm uptake of STRIDE and DUR across various lines of therapy, with encouraging efficacy and safety outcomes in routine practice. [Table: see text]

Resumption of Intravenous Anti-Cancer Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Real-World Experience During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, has delayed medical consultations, especially for patients receiving intravenous anti-cancer therapy. We aim to investigate alterations in immune function among breast cancer patients who experience delayed intravenous therapy due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed an observational investigation of breast cancer patients in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from December 27, 2022, to January 20, 2023. Patients who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible for enrollment. Peripheral blood samples were taken prior to the restart of intravenous anti-cancer therapy to examine hematologic parameters. A total of 131 patients were included in the final analysis. Cough (74.0%), fever (62.6%), and expectoration (46.6%) were identified as the most presenting symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in breast cancer. The average nucleic acid conversion time and delayed treatment time was 13.4 days and 13.9 days, respectively. The patients >60 years old experienced prolonged nucleic acid conversion time (P = 0.017) and delayed treatment time (P = 0.028) compared to those <= 60 years old. Dysregulated lymphocyte subsets and cytokines were found post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 7.6% after resuming intravenous anti-cancer therapy. Our findings reveal that the SARS-CoV-2 infection led to imbalanced immune responses and postponed intravenous anti-cancer therapy in breast cancer. The safety report encourages timely resumption of intravenous anti-cancer therapy after adequately weighing the risks and benefits.

PD-1 inhibitors combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin in first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a network meta-analysis

BackgroundThe combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with paclitaxel/cisplatinum (PD-1 + TP) and fluoropyrimidine/cisplatinum (PD-1 + FP) both have been shown to improve overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is no consensus on which chemotherapy regimen combined with PD-1 has better efficacy. To deal with this important issue in the first-line treatment of patients with ESCC, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed.MethodsData were collected from eligible studies searched in Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the OS, and PFS, odds ratio (OR) for the objective response rate (ORR) and ≥ 3 grade treatment-related adverse events (≥ 3TRAEs) were estimated to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with TP or FP.ResultsFive RCTs and one retrospective study involving 3685 patients and evaluating four treatments were included in this NMA. Compared to other treatments, PD-1 + TP was better. For the PFS, the HRs for PD-1 + TP compared to PD-1 + FP, TP and FP were 0.59 (0.44, 0.80), 0.56 (0.51, 0.61) and 0.45 (0.37, 0.56) respectively. For the OS, PD-1 + TP was also a better treatment compared to other treatments. The HRs were 0.74 (0.56, 0.96), 0.64 (0.57, 0.71), 0.53 (0.43, 0.67) respectively. For the ORR, there was no significant difference between PD-1 + TP and PD-1 + FP, and the ORs were 1.2 (0.69, 2.11). Compare with TP and FP, PD-1 + TP had an obvious advantage, ORs were 2.5 (2.04, 3.04) and 2.95 (1.91, 4.63). For ≥ 3TRAEs, PD-1 + TP compared to other treatments, ORs were 1.34 (0.74, 2.46) and 1.13 (0.92, 1.38) and 2.23 (1.35, 3.69).ConclusionPD-1 + TP significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to PD-1 + FP. Taking into account both efficacy and safety, PD-1 + TP may be a superior first-line treatment option for ESCC.

Abstract B034: A phase 2 basket study of the oral MDM2 inhibitor milademetan for MDM2-amplified advanced solid tumors (MANTRA-2)

Abstract Milademetan is an oral, selective, small molecular inhibitor of the MDM2-p53 complex that reactivates p53 to induce cancer cell apoptosis and tumor regressions in nonclinical models. Clinically, MDM2 gene amplification (amp) occurs in 1–2% of advanced solid tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis. Preliminary antitumor activity was seen in patients with MDM2 amp and TP53 wild-type (WT) tumors in a phase 1 clinical trial [Tirunagaru et al. AACR-NCI-EORTC 2021]. We conducted a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the efficacy of milademetan in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors (except liposarcoma, intimal sarcoma, and primary CNS tumors) with MDM2 copy number (CN) ≥8 and WT TP53 status based on local next-generation sequencing (NGS) (NCT05012397). Milademetan was administered at 260 mg on days 1–3 and 15–17 of a 28-day cycle. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks (RECIST v1.1). MDM2 CN was retrospectively analyzed centrally using a commercial NGS assay, which also allowed correlation with other co-occurring alterations. As of June 23, 2023, 39 patients were enrolled with 13 distinct tumor types. The most common histologies were biliary tract cancers (8, 20.5%), sarcomas (7, 17.9%), and breast cancer (6, 15.3%). Median number of prior systemic therapies was 3 (range 0–12). Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for safety. The most common hematologic grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) related to milademetan were thrombocytopenia (26.3%), neutropenia (15.8%), and anemia (10.5%). All grade treatment-related AEs (&amp;gt;15% incidence) included thrombocytopenia (44.7%), nausea (42.1%), fatigue (36.8%), vomiting (31.6%), anemia (23.7%), diarrhea (23.7%) and neutropenia (18.4%). No bleeding or neutropenic sepsis events were reported, and no grade 5 events were observed. The dose reduction rate was 13.2%, and 7.9% of patients discontinued milademetan due to AEs. Central tumor testing was available on 30 (76.9%) patients and only 2 (6.7%) patients demonstrated MDM2 CN below the threshold of 8. Thirty-two patients were efficacy evaluable and had confirmed CN ≥8 or pending central analysis. Five partial responses (15.6%) were observed (4 unconfirmed, 1 confirmed) with one each in lung adenocarcinoma (co-alteration of EGFR + KRAS), pancreatic (KRAS), bladder (pending), gastric cancer (DNAB1-PRKACA) and endometrial sarcoma (CCND2). No clear correlation between MDM2 CN and tumor regression was observed. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.5–6.1). The longest patient on milademetan therapy was 41 weeks (biliary, best RECIST 1.1 response SD with –29% tumor reduction). Ten patients are currently ongoing. Milademetan monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor responses with a manageable toxicity profile in a variety of MDM2 amp, TP53 WT solid tumors, including those with other oncogenic drivers such as KRAS. Rational combination strategies with milademetan should be considered in tumors with WT TP53 to further enhance durable anti-tumor activity. Citation Format: Ecaterina E. Dumbrava, Christopher T. Chen, Gregory M. Cote, Glenn J. Hanna, Thomas E. Stinchcombe, Bradley Sumrall, Trisha Wise-Draper, Mohammed Kanaan, Steven Duffy, Christopher Sumey, Patrick Cobb, Naisargee Shah, Bo Zhang, Nora Ku, Robert C. Doebele, Mrinal Gounder. A phase 2 basket study of the oral MDM2 inhibitor milademetan for MDM2-amplified advanced solid tumors (MANTRA-2) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B034.

Initial Report of Part B Phase 1/2 Efficacy and Safety Results for Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Rilzabrutinib in Patients with Relapsed Immune Thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Rilzabrutinib is a potent oral, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can treat hematological autoimmune diseases through multiple putative mechanisms of action: (1) inhibition of B-cell activation, (2) interruption of antibody-coated cell phagocytosis by FcϒR in spleen and liver, and (3) induce sustained anti-inflammatory effects (Langrish J Immunol 2021). Preliminary evidence showed that rilzabrutinib treatment resulted in rapid and durable platelet responses with a favorable safety profile in previously treated patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as studied in part A of a phase 1/2 clinical study (LUNA 2; Kuter N Engl J Med 2022). This abstract summarizes the results of part B that focused on the durability of response with rilzabrutinib in relapsed ITP patients. Methods: Part B of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilzabrutinib 400 mg bid in patients with relapsed ITP (NCT03395210). Adult patients aged 18-80 y were eligible with ≥2 baseline platelet counts &amp;lt;30x10 9/L no less than 7 days apart in the 15 days before the first dose. Eligible patients were required to have a past response (achievement of platelet count ≥50x10 9/L) to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)/anti-D or corticosteroid (CS) that was not sustained and failed ≥1 other ITP therapy (that was not IVIg or CS). Stable doses of concomitant CS/thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) were allowed with rilzabrutinib. The primary endpoints for part B were safety and durable platelet response defined as platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L on ≥8 of the last 12 weeks of rilzabrutinib without rescue medication. Patients completing 24 weeks of rilzabrutinib with platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L or ≥30x10 9/L and doubling from baseline in ≥4 of the last 8 weeks of treatment without rescue medication could continue rilzabrutinib in the long-term extension (LTE) period. Results: At baseline, 26 enrolled patients had a median age of 57 y (range, 20-75), 62% were female, and median baseline platelet count was 13x10 9/L (range, 2-24x10 9/L). Patients had a median duration of ITP of 10.3 y (range, 0.7-48.2) and had received a median of 6 prior unique ITP therapies (range, 3-19; 46% splenectomy). Seventeen patients (65%) received concomitant non-rescue CS and/or TPO-RA. Nine patients (35%; 95% CI, 17%-56%) achieved the primary endpoint of durable platelet response. Approximately 25% of patients achieved platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L by day 15 of rilzabrutinib treatment (Figure 1A). In 16 patients who achieved platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L, median time to first platelet count ≥50x10 9/L was 15 days (range, 7-134). Median platelet counts for all patients (responders and non-responders) increased over time, exceeding the platelet count thresholds of 30x10 9/L at day 57 and 50x10 9/L at day 120 (Figure 1B). The mean number of weeks with platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L and/or ≥30x10 9/L and doubling from baseline was both 9.3 weeks (SD, 10.1). Three patients (12%) received rescue medication in the main treatment period. Fifteen patients (58%) completed 24 weeks of rilzabrutinib and 11 (42%) entered the LTE. Over the main treatment period, the median duration of treatment was 167 days (range, 7-169). Sixteen patients (62%) had ≥1 related treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), including 35% diarrhea, 23% headache, and 15% nausea. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2; there was 1 treatment-related AE of grade 3 blood creatinine phosphokinase increase. There was no treatment-related grade ≥2 bleeding/thrombotic events or infections, serious AEs, or deaths. Conclusion: Part B study results were consistent with part A. Rilzabrutinib demonstrated rapid, stable, and durable platelet responses in patients with relapsed ITP, with a favorable safety profile in part B.

IMM01 Plus Tislelizumab in Prior Anti-PD-1 Failed Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study (IMM01-04) Evaluating Safety As Well As Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity

Background: IMM01, a recombinant SIRPa-Fc fusion protein, can activate macrophages to enhance anti-tumor activity by blocking CD47-SIRPa interaction. IMM01 showed unique property of weak human erythrocyte conjugation in preclinical studies, and low incidence of anemia in early clinical trials with no need for a priming dose. IMM01 plus tislelizumab has the potential to augment both innate and adaptive anti-tumor immune responses. Methods: IMM01 at a dose of 2.0mg/kg was administered once a week and tislelizumab (200mg) was administered once every 3 weeks. 2.0mg/kg of IMM01 was determined as RP2D when combo with tislelizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (e.g. SCLC, NSCLC, HNSCC). The primary objective of this phase 2 study was to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity as well as safety of IMM01 plus tislelizumab in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who have failed prior check point inhibitor treatment. A total of 32 patients are planned to be enrolled in this phase 2 study according to pre-plan statistical assumption. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. The anti-tumor activity was assessed according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. Results: As of 19 Jul 2023, 20 cHL patients (median age: 34 years, range: 23-73 years) who have failed prior anti-PD-1 treatment were enrolled, 18 patients were relapsed on anti-PD1, and 2 patients were anti-PD1 refractory. 18 (90%) patients received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. All patients had Ann Arbor stage III-IV disease. Among total 14 evaluable patients, 2 patients achieved complete response (CR), 7 patients achieved partial response (PR). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 64.3% and 100%, respectively. Among the responders, 5 patients failed prior tislelizumab. As of 7 Jul 2023, for all 20 treated patients, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 18 (90.0%) patients. The most frequent TRAEs (≥ 20%) were platelet count decreased (50.0%), lymphocyte count decreased (35.0%), anemia (30.0%), white blood count decreased (30.0%), neutrophil count decreased (25.0%) and Gamma-glutamyl transferase increased (20.0%). Most TRAEs were grade 1-2. TRAEs of grade ≥3 occurred in 7 (35%) patients, including lymphocyte count decreased (30.0%), platelet count decreased (10.0%), neutrophil count decreased (5.0%) and white blood count decreased (5.0%). 1 patient had treatment related SAE (platelet count decreased, grade 3) and recovered without bleeding. There was no reported hemolytic anemia or hemolysis in any of the patients. No TRAEs leading to drug discontinuation or death. Conclusions: IMM01-04 showed a robust anti-tumor effectivity with a well-tolerated safety profile in prior anti-PD-1 failed classical Hodgkin Lymphoma patients. The phase 2 study is ongoing.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab as first line therapy in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

Approximately 30-40% of patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an impaired performance status (PS). There are limited prospective data on the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in these patients. In this single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02879617), patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2 received durvalumab 1500mg every 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety determined by grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Between April 2017 and March 2021, 50 patients were enrolled, of whom 47 received durvalumab. With a median follow-up of 28 months, median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4-10). TRAEs grade 3 occurred in nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI 9%-33%). OS in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 0, 1-49%, and ≥50% was six months (95% CI 3-15), 11 months (95% CI 4-16), and 11 months (95% CI 0-not reached (NR)), respectively. Health related quality of life (HQRL) assessed at baseline and during therapy demonstrated no statistically significant change over the course of treatment. This study demonstrates that single agent durvalumab is safe and well tolerated in the 1st line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2, with an encouraging OS benefit in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. This trial is amongst the largest prospective studies evaluating durvalumab in the 1st line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and a PS of2. AstraZeneca, NCI P30CA047904.