Treatment Of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Research Articles

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

P315. Exploring gender differences in outcomes following treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits

P315. Exploring gender differences in outcomes following treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits

Efficacy and safety of conservative treatment in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis

Objective. To conduct a meta-analysis of studies focused on the conservative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and to determine the efficacy and safety of this method in the observed group of patients.Material and Methods. The study was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria for meta-analysis were as follows: availability of full-text version of the article in English or Russian; A3 or A4 type fractures according to the AOSpine classification, or burst fractures of types IIA, IIB or IIC according to the Denis classification, or a direct indication of the presence of a burst fracture without its classification; absence of neurological deficit; age over 18 years; detailed description of treatment outcomes or complications; and a follow-up for at least one year.Results. The meta-analysis included 29 articles describing the results of treatment of 1107 patients. At the time of admission, the following radiographic parameters were calculated for patients: mean kyphotic angle, 13.6 (95 % CI, 10.8–16.5), degree of vertebral body compression, 39.9 % (95 % CI, 27.7–52.0), and the degree of compression of the spinal canal lumen, 41.7 % (95 % CI, 29.2–54.2). A follow-up examination revealed a significant increase in segmental kyphosis by 3%, in vertebral body compression by 3.7 %, and lysis of bone fragments with a decrease in the degree of spinal canal stenosis by 2 times. The incidence of neurological deficit and progression of thoracic and lumbar spine instability was 5.8 % (95 % CI, 4.1–8.1) and 6.5 % (95 % CI, 4.5–9.3), respectively. Recovery of work ability according to Denis scale was as follows: W1 and W2 – 74.7 % (95 % CI, 63.9–83.1); W3 – 14.1 % (95 % CI, 10.2–19.3); and W4 and W5 – 14.8 % (95 % CI, 8.8–23.9).Conclusion. Conservative treatment of neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures can be an effective and safe option if the angular deformity does not exceed 16 degrees and the anterior vertebral body compression rate is up to 52 %. With conservative therapy, a twofold reduction in spinal canal stenosis was observed due to the lysis of bone fragments. The pooled prevalence of radiculopathy or myelopathy with conservative therapy was 5.8 %. Orthopedic intervention due to the progression of instability of the damaged segment may be required in 6.5 % of patients. More than 90 % of patients returned to full-time work following conservative therapy. Comparative studieson the effectiveness of conservative therapy versus surgical treatment should be continued to form clear recommendations for the choice of treatment tactics for patients with uncomplicated fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Biomechanical Effect of Different Posterior Fixation Techniques on Stability and Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture With Osteoporosis: A Finite Element Analysis.

Finite element analysis. To investigate the biomechanical effect of four posterior fixation techniques on stability and adjacent segment degeneration in treating thoracolumbar burst fractures with osteoporosis. In terms of stability and adjacent segment degeneration, there remains no consensus or guidelines on the optimal technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Images of CT scans were imported into MIMICS and further processed by Geomagic to build three-dimensional models of the T10-L5 region. A v-shaped osteotomy was performed on the L1 vertebral body to simulate a burst fracture in the setting of osteoporosis. Subsequently, four fixation techniques were designed using SolidWorks software. Range of motion (ROM) of the global spine, ROM distribution, ROM of adjacent segment, Von Mises stress on adjacent intervertebral disks, and facet joints were analyzed. Among the four groups, the cortical bone screw fixation (CBT) showed the highest global ROM at 1.86°, while long-segmented pedicle screw fixation (LSPS) had the lowest global ROM at 1.25°. The LSPS had the smallest percentage of ROM of fractured vertebral body to fixed segment at 75.04%, suggesting the highest stability after fixation. The maximum ROM of the adjacent segment was observed in the CBT at 1.32°, while the LSPS exhibited the smallest at 0.89°. However, the LSPS group experienced larger maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral disks (9.60MPa) and facet joints (3.36MPa), indicating an increasing risk of adjacent segment disease. LSPS provided the greatest stability, while CBT provided the smallest amount of stability. However, the elevated stress on adjacent intervertebral disks and facet joints after LSPS fixation increased the possibility of adjacent segment degeneration. Cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPS) and combined cortical bone screw and pedicle screw fixation (CBT-PS) demonstrated significant biomechanical advantages in providing moderate fixation strength while reducing stress on the intervertebral disks and facet joints.

Long-term efficacy of balloon-assisted endplate augmentation combined with transforaminal pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures

Objectives: To investigate the long-term efficacy of balloon assisted endplate reduction with vertebral augmentation combined with pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, and to compare the clinical efficacy of calcium sulfate cement (CSC) and calcium phosphate cement(CPC). Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study.The clinical data of 39 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures admitted to Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from November 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were treated with pedicle screw reduction and fixation of the injured vertebra,balloon-assisted reduction of the collapsed endplate of the injured vertebra,and artificial bone vertebral body augmentation,and the follow-up time was >5 years.There were 24 males and 15 females,aged (42.9±13.3) years (range: 29 to 56 years).According to the Frankel spinal nerve dysfunction grading standard, there were 4 cases of grade C, 7 cases of grade D and 28 cases of grade E. There were 21 cases of CSC augmentation(CSC group) and 18 cases of CPC augmentation (CPC group). X-ray and CT were performed at 1 week, 1-, 2-, 5-year after surgery and at the last follow-up, and the imaging indicators were measured, including the injured vertebra anterior edge height ratio,the injured vertebra middle height ratio,the injured vertebra wedge angle,and the sagittal plane Cobb angle. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used for functional evaluation, nervous function was evaluated according to the Frankel spinal nerve dysfunction grading standard.Independent sample t test was used for inter-group comparison, and paired sample t test and repeated measure ANOVA were used for intra-group comparison. Results: All operative procedures were successfully completed, no spinal nerve function damage occurred. The postoperative imaging indexes of the patients were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (all P<0.01). The follow-up time of patients was (6.7±2.8)years (range: 5 to 9 years). Among the 11 patients with symptoms of neurological impairment before surgery, 9 patients completely recovered at the last follow-up, and 2 patients recovered from Frankel grade C to D. There were no significant differences in imaging indexes between the first week after surgery and the last follow-up in the CPC group (all P>0.05), while there were significant differences in imaging indexes between the CSC group and the last follow-up (all P<0.05). CPC group was superior to CSC group in frontal height ratio, middle height ratio, wedge angle variation and sagittal Cobb angle correction loss at 2 year, 5 year after surgery and the last follow-up, with statistical significance (all P<0.05). At the last follow-up, there were no differences in VAS and ODI between the two groups (all P>0.05). After absorption of CSC in the filling area, a hardened zone was formed around the area, and the central cavity remained without bone tissue filling. CPC absorption was very slow, and the CPC group was still filled satisfactorily at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Balloon assisted endplate reduction and vertebral augmentation combined with pedicle screw fixation through the injured vertebra have good long-term efficacy in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Compared with CSC, CPC vertebral augmentation can better maintain the shape and spinal sequence of the injured vertebra in the long term, and can effectively reduce the collapse of the space above the injured vertebra.

Predictive Algorithm for Surgery Recommendation in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficits.

Predictive algorithm via decision tree. Artificial intelligence (AI) remain an emerging field and have not previously been used to guide therapeutic decision making in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Building such models may reduce the variability in treatment recommendations. The goal of this study was to build a mathematical prediction rule based upon radiographic variables to guide treatment decisions. Twenty-two surgeons from the AO Knowledge Forum Trauma reviewed 183 cases from the Spine TL A3/A4 prospective study (classification, degree of certainty of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, use of M1 modifier, degree of comminution, treatment recommendation). Reviewers' regions were classified as Europe, North/South America and Asia. Classification and regression trees were used to create models that would predict the treatment recommendation based upon radiographic variables. We applied the decision tree model which accounts for the possibility of non-normal distributions of data. Cross-validation technique as used to validate the multivariable analyses. The accuracy of the model was excellent at 82.4%. Variables included in the algorithm were certainty of PLC injury (%), degree of comminution (%), the use of M1 modifier and geographical regions. The algorithm showed that if a patient has a certainty of PLC injury over 57.5%, then there is a 97.0% chance of receiving surgery. If certainty of PLC injury was low and comminution was above 37.5%, a patient had 74.2% chance of receiving surgery in Europe and Asia vs 22.7% chance in North/South America. Throughout the algorithm, the use of the M1 modifier increased the probability of receiving surgery by 21.4% on average. This study presents a predictive analytic algorithm to guide decision-making in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. PLC injury assessment over 57.5% was highly predictive of receiving surgery (97.0%). A high degree of comminution resulted in a higher chance of receiving surgery in Europe or Asia vs North/South America. Future studies could include clinical and other variables to enhance predictive ability or use machine learning for outcomes prediction in thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Treatment Using Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation and Autogenous Bulk Iliac Bone Graft Fusion

Background: Thoracolumbar vertebral fracture is the most common type of thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. For the patients with severe thoracolumbar vertebral burst fracture and neurological impairment, surgical decompression and reconstruction of spinal stability is an important intervention method, however, there is still controversy on the way of postoperative stability reconstruction. Objective: This study was to investigate the efffcacy of posterior open reduction, pedicle screw ffxation, and autogenous iliac bone graft fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological impairment. Methods: The clinical data of 43 patients with thoracolumbar single vertebral burst fracture with neurological function injury treated in our department from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of lumbothoracic pain, the occupying rate of spinal canal, the ratio of the anterior height of the injured vertebral body to the normal height, Cobb angle, and the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classiffcation of neurological function were compared before and after operation. All patients completed the procedure successfully. Results: Bone graft fusion was achieved in all patients, and no screw or rod was broken. The VAS score of thoracolumbar pain, the ratio of the anterior height of the injured vertebral body to the normal height, and the Cobb angle were signiffcantly lower than those before operation at 1 and 12 months after operation (P &lt; 0.001). There was no signiffcant difference in the VAS score of thoracolumbar pain, the ratio of the anterior height of the injured vertebral body to the normal height, and the Cobb angle between 1 and 12 months after operation. The occupying rate of spinal canal 6 months after operation was lower than that before operation (12.02% ±7.35% vs. 46.98% ±9.26%), and the difference was statistically signiffcant (t = 20.066, P &lt; 0.05). There was a signiffcant difference in ASIA classiffcation of neurological function between 12 months after operation and before operation (Z = −5.372, P &lt; 0.001). The neurological function was signiffcantly improved 12 months after operation. Conclusion: Reconstruction of vertebral lamina with iliac bone graft is an effective method for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, which can reduce the loss of vertebral height and recurrent kyphosis and avoid the neurological impairment caused by secondary spinal stenosis.

Analysis of factors associated with the failure of treatment in thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with short-segment posterior spinal fixation

BackgroundThe treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures continues to pose challenges. Although short-segment posterior spinal fixation (SSPSF) has shown satisfactory clinical outcomes, it is accompanied by a relatively high rate of treatment failure. This study aimed to assess factors associated with treatment failure in thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with SSPSF.MethodsThe clinical data of 241 consecutive patients with a traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture who underwent SSPSF at our center between Apr 2016 and Apr 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups (failure of the treatment group and non-failure of the treatment group). We compared potential risk factors for the failure of treatment including age, gender, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, vertebral body compression rate, use of crosslinks, percentage of anterior height compression, presence of index level instrumentation, Cobb angle, interpedicular distance (IPD), canal compromise, Load Sharing Classification (LSC) score, use of posterolateral fusion, and pain intensity between the two groups.ResultsA sum of 137 (56.8%) males and 104 (43.2%) females were enrolled where the mean age and follow-up of the participants were 48.34 ± 10.23 years and 18.67 ± 5.23 months, respectively. Treatment failure was observed in 34 cases (14.1%). The results of the binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the lack of index level instrumentation (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.78–3.04; P = 0.014), LSC score (odds ratio [OR] 2.64; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.34–3.77; P = 0.007), and IPD (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.51–2.67; P = 0.023) were independently associated with a higher rate of failure of treatment.ConclusionsThe findings of this study revealed that increased rates of treatment failure in thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with SSPSF were associated with factors such as the absence of index level instrumentation, higher LSC scores, and larger IPD. These findings could be helpful in the proper management of patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Functional and Radiological Outcome of Short Same Segment Instrumentation in Thoracolumbar Burst fracture.

Thoracolumbar region is important biomechanics transition zone in which rigid thoracic and flexible lumbar spine meet. This area is highly vulnerable to traumatic spinal fracture.Among all spine fracture, compression type is most common and managed conservatively. Thoracolumbar spine fracture can be associated with neurological deficit, spinal instability. The optimal treatment for these injuries is still controversy and subject for research. This retrospective study included 30 patients with single level thoracolumbar fracture.All the patients clinical and radiological parameters were evaluated preoperative, post-operative and 1 year follow up. Clinical parameters were included Visual analogue score, Oswestry disability index. Radiologic measurement were regional kyphotic angle by cobb's method and anterior vertebral body height loss (Mumford' santerior body compression equation method) in X-ray. All the data were analysed in SPSS version 20. A total of 30 patients were included in this study,19 were male.The mean age of the patients were 40.8±13.The main cause of injury was fall from height,26 patients. The most common level of fracture vertebra was L1,11 patients.The mean difference of preop and postop kyphosis was 11.70±50 with P<0.05.The mean difference of preop Oswestry disability index and postop Oswestry disability index score was 30.7±7.6 with T score 22(P<0.05).The preop and postop Visual analogue score score also improved ,mean difference was 2.8±1(P<0.05). Short segment instrumentation with placement of pedicle screw at fracture vertebra is one option in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Clinic choice of long or short segment pedicle screw-rod fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture: From scan data to numerical study.

Based on computerized tomography scanning images of human lumbar vertebrae, finite element (FE) analysis is performed to predict the stress of pedicle screws, rods, and fractured vertebra as well as the displacement of fractured vertebra after internal fixation treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. A three-dimensional FE model of L1-L5 lumbar vertebrae with L3 burst fracture has been established and four fixation methods, namely, short segment cross- and trans-injured vertebrae, long segment cross- and trans-injured vertebrae fixations, have been adopted to perform posterior pedicle fixation. The stress distributions of the screws, rods, and fractured vertebra and the total deformation of the fractured vertebra are investigated under six different physiological motions. From the view of the stress on the screw-rod system and the deformation of the fractured vertebral body, the long segment cross-injured vertebra fixation has the best mechanical performance, followed by the long segment trans-injured vertebra fixation, and then the short segment fixation trans-injured vertebra. The short segment fixation cross-injured vertebra performs the worst. Among the six motions, the forward flexion movement has the greatest impact on the screw-rod system and the fractured vertebra. However, the rotation motion greatly affects the stress of the screw in the long segment fixation. This indicates that the longer the fixed segment is, the more susceptible it is to human rotation. Thus, for patients with severe fracture, the long segment cross-injured vertebra is preferred. On the contrary, the short segment trans-injured vertebra fixation is optimal.

Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis. To update the systematic review comparing the outcomes between surgical and non-surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. We registered a protocol in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021291769) and searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Surgical and non-surgical treatments were compared in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. Predefined outcomes at ≥6months included pain (defined as a visual analog scale [VAS] of 0-100), functional outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] of 0-50 and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] of 0-24), and kyphotic angulation. Nineteen studies involving 1056 patients were included in the analyses. For outcomes at ≥6months, little to no difference was found in pain VAS score (mean difference, .95 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -6.02 to 7.92]; 827 participants; 15 studies; I2 = 92%), ODI (mean difference, -1.40 [95% CI, -5.11 to 2.31]; 446 participants; 7 studies; I2 = 79%), and RMDQ (mean difference, -.73 [95% CI, -5.13 to 3.66]; 216 participants; 5 studies; I2 = 77%). The kyphotic angulation in the surgery group was 6.35° lower than that in the non-surgery group (mean difference, -6.56° [95% CI, -10.26° to -2.87°]; 527 participants; ten studies; I2 = 86%). The trial sequential analysis indicated all outcomes reached adequate statistical power. The certainty of the evidence for all 4 outcomes was very low. For the analysis of minimally invasive procedures compared to traditional open surgeries, a statistically significant subgroup difference was found for VAS and ODI (P < .01 and P < .04, respectively). Surgical and non-surgical treatments showed little or no difference in outcomes at ≥6months. This review provides a conclusion with adequate statistical power by including non-randomized studies. However, non-randomized studies also lowered the certainty of the evidence to a very low level.

Treatment of spinal burst fractures with pedicle screw fixation at high altitude area

According to the characteristics of spinal burst fractures in high-altitude areas and the local medical conditions, to explore the clinical efficacy of short-segment fixation with pedicle screws combined with screw placement in injured vertebrae in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. From August 2018 to December 2021, 12 patients with single-vertebral thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological symptoms were treated with injured vertebral screw placement technique, including 7 males and 5 females;aged 29 to 54 years old, with an average of(42.50±7.95) years old;6 cases of traffic accident injury, 4 cases of high fall injury, 2 cases of heavy object injury;2 cases of T11, 4 cases of T12, 3 cases of L1, 2 cases of L2, and 1 case of L3. In the operation, screws were first placed in the upper and lower vertebrae of the fracture, pedicle screws were placed in the injured vertebra, and connecting rods were installed, and the fractured vertebral body was reset by positioning and distraction. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring were used to evaluate the changes in pain and quality of life of patients, and the kyphotic correction rate and correction loss rate of the injured segment were measured by X-ray. All operations were successful without significant intraoperative complications. All 12 patients were followed up, the duration ranged from 9 to 27 months, with an mean of (17.75±5.79) months. VAS at 3 days after operation was significantly higher than that at admission (t=6.701, P=0.000). There was significant difference in JOA score between 9 months after operation and at admission (t=5.085, P=0.000). Three days after operation, Cobb angle was (4.42±1.16)°, and the correction rate was (82±5)% compared with (25.67±5.71)° at admission. Cobb angle was (5.08±1.24) °at 9 months after operation, with a corrected loss rate of (16±13)%. No loosening or breakage of internal fixation was found. Under the high-altitude hypobaric and hypoxic environment, the effect of the operation should be ensured while reducing the trauma. The application of the technique of placing screws on the injured vertebra can effectively restore and maintain the height of the injured vertebra, with less bleeding and shorter fixed segments, which is an effective method.

Clinical effect of limited posterior decompression and 13-mm titanium mesh implantation onsevere thoracolumbar burst fractures: A case series.

Posterior incision with 270° spinal canal decompression and reconstruction surgery is a treatment option for thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBF), but the large diameter titanium mesh placement is difficult. This study evaluated the characteristics and clinical effects of limited posterior decompression and 13-mm titanium mesh implantation to treat TLBF. 13-mm titanium meshes could be used to fix thoracolumbar burst fractures. This case series included patients who underwent limited posterior decompression and 13-mm titanium mesh implantation at China Medical University Shaoxing Hospital (01/2015-12/2019). The Cobb angle, injury vertebral anterior edge height loss percentage, and spinal canal occupancy rate were analyzed. The degree of spinal cord injury was evaluated according to the ASIA grade. Fifteen patients were included (eight males and seven females). The patients were 32.2 ± 4.6 years of age. The American Association of Spinal Injury improved after surgery (A/B/C/D/E: from 2/6/5/2/0 to 0/0/2/8/5, P < 0.001). The Cobb angle decreased after surgery (from 20.1 ± 4.8° to 7.1 ± 1.4°, P < 0.001) but increased to 8.2 ± 0.9° at 1 year (P = 0.003). The percentage of loss of the anterior edge height of the injured vertebrae decreased after surgery (from 40.9% ± 6.1% to 7.5% ± 1.8%, P < 0.001) and decreased at 1 year (7.0% ± 1.5%, P = 0.044). The spinal canal occupancy rate decreased after surgery (from 64.8% ± 7.8% to 20.1% ± 4.2%, P < 0.001) but did not decrease further at 1 year (19.4% ± 3.4%, P = 0.166). Spinal canal limited posterior decompression, and 13-mm titanium mesh implantation in the treatment of TLBF can achieve one-stage spinal canal decompression and three-column reconstruction. The curative effect was satisfying. Level IV; case series.

Endoscopic Decompression Combined with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Neurological Deficits: Technical Note and Early Outcomes

The aim of this study is to introduce surgical technique of endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) for thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) with neurological deficits and evaluate its efficacy. A total of 32 patients with TLBFs and neurological deficits who were treated by endoscopic decompression combined with PPSF from June 2018 to August 2019 were included in this study. The effect of decompression was analyzed using canal encroachment ratio, while deformity correction was assessed using the sagittal Cobb angle and the percentage of anterior vertebral height. We also analyzed other clinical outcomes such as visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale dose. The patients were followed up for an average of 16months. Our data showed that the patients' mean operation time was 153.75minutes, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 48.84mL, and the mean incision length was 7.78cm. The canal encroachment ratio decreased from 55.91% ± 12.27% to 12.44% ± 3.91% (P < 0.05), sagittal Cobb angle decreased from 17.09°±5.46° to 5.72°±3.68° (P < 0.05), while the percentage of anterior vertebral height increased from 53.72% ± 8.99% to 83.22% ± 8.21% (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale classification (P < 0.05). Screw fracture occurred only in one patient during follow-up. Endoscopic decompression combined with PPSF in the treatment of TLBFs with neurological deficits is safe and effective, which is a new minimally invasive method for the treatment of such diseases.

Biomechanical Comparison Between Posterior Long-Segment Fixation, Short-Segment Fixation, and Short-Segment Fixation With Intermediate Screws for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis.

Posterior long-segment (LS) fixation, short-segment (SS) fixation, and short segment fixation with intermediate screws (SI) have shown good outcomes for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. However, limited data compared the biomechanical properties between LS fixation and SI. The purpose of this study was to compare the von Mises stresses on the pedicular screw system and bone between posterior LS fixation, SS fixation, and SI for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. The finite element model of thoracolumbar spines from T11 to L3 was created based on the computed tomography image of a patient with a burst fracture of the L1 vertebral body. The models of pedicular screws, rods, and locking nuts were constructed based on information from the manufacturer. Three models with different fixation configurations-that is, LS, SS, and SI-were established. The axial load was applied to the superior surface of the model. The inferior surface was fixed. The stress on each screw, rod, and vertebral body was analyzed. The motion of the spine in SS (0.5 mm) and SI (0.9 mm) was higher than in LS (0.2 mm). In all models, the lowest pedicle screws are the most stressed. The stress along the connecting rods was comparable between SI and LS (50 MPa). At the fracture level, stress was found at the pedicles and vertebral bodies in SI. There was relatively little stress around the fractured vertebral body in LS and SS. Posterior SI preserves more spinal motion than the LS. In addition, it provides favorable biomechanical properties than the SS. The stress that occurred around the pedicle screws in SI was the least among the 3 constructs, which might reduce complications such as implant failure. SI produces more stress in the fractured vertebral body than LS and SS, which could potentially aid in bone healing according to the Wolff law. SI has proved to be a biomechanically favorable construct and helps preserve the spinal motion segment. It could be an alternative surgical option for treating patients who present with thoracolumbar burst fractures.

What's New in Spine Surgery.

What's New in Spine Surgery.

Open Muscle-Preserving Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Conventional Open Posterior Approach in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture without Neurologic Injury

Introduction: Patients who sustained thoracolumbar spine fracture without neurological deficit often require surgical treatment. The conventional open posterior approach had some disadvantages including post-operative pain, blood loss, and duration of the operation. The minimally invasive approach, open muscle-preserving pedicle screw fixation, was proposed to have more benefit than the conventional approach. This study evaluated the clinical and perioperative outcomes of thoracolumbar burst fracture fixation using the open muscle-preserving approach and the conventional open posterior approach. Methods: A prospective cohort study from June 2016 to June 2017 of the open muscle-preserving pedicle screw fixation approach was done compared to the historical control of the conventional open posterior approach from May 2015 to May 2016. The post-operative pain score, blood loss, duration of operation and clinical outcome were analyzed. Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the muscle-preserving approach group, and 27 patients treated with the conventional open posterior approach were the control group. Post-operative VAS was significantly better in the muscle-preserving group (P&lt;0.001). The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the muscle-preserving group (60.4±17.3 min. vs. 90.9±18.9 min., p&lt;0.001). Moreover, the mean intra-operative blood loss of the muscle-preserving group was also significantly lower (156.96±96.3ml. vs. 269.26±147.6ml., p=0.003). Conclusion: Our study results indicate a superiority of the open muscle-preserving approach over the conventional open posterior approach for a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurologic injury in terms of post-operative pain score, blood loss and duration of operation. The open muscle-preserving approach is an alternative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Comparison of the Posterior and Paraspinal Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: Burst fractures cause over half of all thoracolumbar fractures, for which the posterior approach has been considered the standard approach. The paraspinal approach has proven safe and effective for thoracolumbar injury. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the two approaches. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 24 patients with isolated thoracolumbar burst fractures between July 2016 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into two groups: paraspinal and posterior approaches. The primary outcome was postoperative pain on days 1, 2, 3, and 14. The corrected Cobb’s angle; operation time; intraoperative blood loss; opioid usage on days 1, 2, and 3; Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, Thai version); and percentage reduction loss at 3 months were secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed on post-intervention days 1, 2, 3, 14, and 90. Results: The mean visual-analog-scale (VAS) scores on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 14 (8.6 ± 0.8, 7.1 ± 0.6, 5.5 ± 1.3, 5.5 ± 0.8); intraoperative blood loss (395.8 ± 113.7 mL); opioid usage on days 2 and 3 (13 ± 1.5 mg, 8.3 ± 1.9 mg); and postoperative ODI (23.5 ± 3.5) were significantly lower (P&lt;0.05) in the paraspinal-approach group than in the posterior-approach group (mean VAS on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 14 [9.2 ± 0.5, 8.3 ± 0.3, 7.5 ± 0.8, 6.7 ± 0.5]; intraoperative blood loss [590 ± 70.1 mL]; opioid usage on days 2 and 3 [15.8 ± 1.9 mg, 11.7 ± 1.6 mg]; and postoperative ODI [40 ± 4.2]). There was no statistical differences in operative time, corrected Cobb’s angle, and percentage reduction loss. Conclusions: The paraspinal approach is significantly advantageous over the conventional posterior approach regarding postoperative pain, intraoperative blood loss, opioid usage, and ODI at 3 months, thus corroborating the minimally invasive concept.

The efficacy and safety of anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThere has always been controversy about the choice of anterior approach or posterior approach for the surgical approach of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBFs). The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anterior and posterior approaches in the treatment of TBFs.MethodsMultiple databases including PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database (Embase), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (WOS) were used to search for relevant studies, namely full-text articles comparing the anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of TBFs, which based on population, intervention, control, outcome, and study (PICOS) framework. Review Manager 5.4 was used to assess the effects of the results among selected studies. The risk of bias of the trials was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. Forest plots and funnel plots were also generated for the included articles.ResultsFinally, 723 patients were included in 13 studies which satisfied the eligibility criteria, funnel plots and Egger’s test showed that there was no significant bias in the publications. There were no differences in terms of length of stay [mean difference (MD): −1.31, (−5.31, 2.69); P=0.52], hospitalization expenses [standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.26, (−0.38, 2.89); P=0.13], and return to work between the anterior approach and posterior approach. However, the posterior approach had the advantages of better Cobb angle correction [MD: 2.06, (0.17, 3.94); P=0.03], shorter operation time [MD: 58.29, (35.39, 81.18); P<0.00001], and lower estimated blood loss [MD: 185.92, (131.76, 240.07); P<0.00001].DiscussionThe posterior approach appeared to be superior to the anterior approach in the treatment of TBFs. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm the conclusions of this study and guide clinical decision-making.

Radiographic Outcomes of Thoracolumbar AOSpine A3 and A4 Fractures Treated With External Bracing

BackgroundThe treatment of AOSpine A3 and A4 fractures is controversial with no consensus regarding their management in the absence of neurologic deficits. While conservative management with spinal orthosis is a reasonable treatment option, it is believed to run the risk of progressive segmental kyphosis.MethodologyA retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients undergoing treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures from T11 to L2. Patients treated with conservative management with lumbar orthosis were included. Upright radiographs at the time of presentation and the one-year follow-up were compared.ResultsIn total, 112 patients were evaluated as being treated with thoracolumbar orthosis. Of these, 61 patients presented with A3 fractures compared with 51 who presented with A4 fractures. Of these, two patients in each group failed conservative management and required surgical intervention. At the one-year follow-up, A3 fractures demonstrated an average change in Cobb angle of 4.1 degrees compared with 6.1 degrees in A4 fractures (p = 0.021). In addition, A4 fractures demonstrated a significantly worse kyphotic angle and Gardner angle at the one-year follow-up (p = 0.05 and p = 0.026, respectively).ConclusionsA3 and A4 fractures can be safely treated with orthosis with overall low rates for failure; however, A4 fractures result in significantly worse segmental kyphosis at the one-year follow-up.