Treatment Of Shoulder Instability Research Articles

Psychological Background Affects Functional Recovery After Surgical Treatment Of Shoulder Instability

Psychological Background Affects Functional Recovery After Surgical Treatment Of Shoulder Instability

Latarjet and Bankart Repairs: Instagram-Based Perception Analysis Shows Comparable Patient Experiences

PurposeTo conduct a comprehensive analysis of public Instagram posts pertaining to Latarjet procedure and Bankart repair, with the aim of elucidating patients’ perspective on the perioperative process, satisfaction and expectations. Methods: Descriptive social media-based investigation using relevant hashtags associated with surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability, covering the period from January 2023 until January 2024. Posts were categorized by perspective, timing, content, tone and satisfaction. Results: 2,395 posts were retrieved, with 526 posts concerning surgical treatment of shoulder instability. 201 (37.9%) posts were authored by patients and 224 (42.3%) posts portrayed personal content and patient experience. The majority were neutral (308; 58.1%) or positive in tone (203; 38.3%). Rehabilitation was mentioned frequently by patients undergoing both procedures (49.2% of Bankart posts and 45.6% of Latarjet). Comparative analysis revealed no statistical differences regarding immobilization (P=0.229), rehabilitation (p=0.226), return to sport (p=0.464), tone (p=0.236) or expression of satisfaction (p=0.826) between both procedures. However, patients treated with Latarjet mentioned surgical site more frequently (p=0.011). There were no differences in mentions of complications (p=0.143). Complications were mentioned in 18 (9.6%) Bankart posts, most commonly recurrence, and in 10 (5.3%) of the Latarjet posts where the most mentioned was pain. Conclusion: Social media posts reflect mostly a neutral or positive patient experience in the surgical treatment of anterior instability. Bankart and Latarjet posts exhibited no differences regarding satisfaction, tone, return to work or activities of daily living. Mention of complications is rare. The most frequent for Bankart repair was recurrence, while for Latarjet posts was postoperative pain. Clinical relevanceThis analysis explores the relevance of social media as an instrument to gain insight into patient perception surgical intervention for anterior shoulder instability.

Osteochondral allografts for the treatment of shoulder instability.

To systematically review the predominant complication rates and changes to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for shoulder instability. This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO, involved a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Key search terms included "allograft", "shoulder", "humerus", and "glenoid". The review encompassed 37 studies with 456 patients, focusing on primary outcomes like failure rates and secondary outcomes such as PROMs and functional test results. A meta-analysis of primary outcomes across 17 studies revealed a dislocation rate of 5.1% and an increase in reoperation rates from 9.3% to 13.7% post-publication bias adjustment. There was also a noted rise in conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty and incidence of osteoarthritis/osteonecrosis over longer follow-up periods. Patient-reported outcomes and functional tests generally showed improvement, albeit with notable variability across studies. A concerning observation was the consistent presence of allograft resorption, with rates ranging from 33% to 80%. Comparative studies highlighted similar efficacy between distal tibial allografts and Latarjet procedures in most respects, with some differences in specific tests. OCA transplantation presents a promising treatment option for shoulder instability, effectively addressing both glenoid and humeral head defects with favourable patient-reported outcomes. These findings advocate for the inclusion of OCA transplantation in treatment protocols for shoulder instability, while also emphasizing the need for further high-quality, long-term research to better understand the procedure's efficacy profile.

Return to sport after arthroscopic xenograft bone block associated with Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation in competitive contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability

BackgroundOpen Bankart repair and Latarjet stabilization are two of surgical procedures used in the treatment of shoulder instability in contact athletes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of bone block arthroscopic procedure, performed with xenograft, in combination with Bankart repair and selective subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for contact athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability. MethodsWe retrospectively assessed contact athletes who underwent arthroscopic bone block with xenograft and Bankart repair with selective augmentation of subscapularis for recurrent anterior shoulder instability between January 2017 and December 2021. Shoulders with posterior instability or multidirectional instability were excluded. Recurrence, complications, return to sport, and functional scores (Rowe score, WOSI score, ASES score) were assessed. A CT scan at 2-year follow-up was performed to assess the status of Bone block integration, its displacement and restoration of glenoid surface. Results16 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 24. None of the patients treated with arthroscopic bone block and ASA presented new dislocation episodes. An increase in preoperative scores was observed at the last follow-up, in particular the ASES, Rowe, and WOSI scores increased from 69±7, 31±9 , 1235±46 respectively to 96.1±3.2, 94±6, 119±51. All athletes returned to sporting activity at or near the same level as pre-surgery. The glenoid bone surface increase from 83% to 116% at last follow-up. ConclusionBone block treatment with Xenograft combined with Bankart repair and ASA procedures has been shown to be effective in treating instability in contact athletes with significant glenoid deficit. All athletes returned to athletic activity at a level similar to the pre-intervention period.

Evaluation of Online Shoulder Instability-Related Patient Education Materials

Background: Younger patients are more likely than older patients to experience shoulder instability and to rely on online educational resources. Although the Internet has increased patient access to medical information, this may not translate to increased health literacy. Purpose: We sought to analyze the quality and readability of online information on shoulder instability. Methods: We conducted a Google search using 6 terms related to shoulder instability. We collected the first 20 non-sponsored results for each term. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Gunning Fox Index (GFI) instruments. Quality was assessed using a Quality Grading Sheet (QGS) and the validated DISCERN instrument. Results: A total of 64 of 120 patient educational materials (PEMs) met the inclusion criteria. The mean FKGL, FRE, and GFI scores were 9.45 ± 0.552, 50.51 ± 3.4, and 11.5 ± 0.6, respectively. The mean DISCERN score and QGS rating were 33.09 ± 2.02 and 10.52 ± 1.28, respectively. While 49 (76.6%) articles discussed operative treatment for persistent shoulder instability, only 4 (6.3%) mentioned risks associated with surgery. Non-institutional sources had higher DISCERN scores than those from medical institutions. Conclusions: This review of online shoulder instability-related PEMs suggests that many do not meet current recommendations, with an average quality rating of “poor” and a mean ninth-grade reading level. Surgeons should be aware of the relative paucity of information on the risks and outcomes associated with operative treatment of shoulder instability contained in these PEMs.

The History and Evolution of the Open Labral Repair with Capsular Shift for Shoulder Instability.

The purpose of this review is to describe the evolution of the open labral repair with capsular shift, including the current role of this procedure in the treatment of shoulder instability. Currently, a subset of patients - high-level collision/contact sport athletes, patients with significant inferior or multi-directional instability, and individuals with failed arthroscopic Bankart repair without bone loss - may experience benefit from undergoing open Bankart repair with capsular shift. Surgeons performing open stabilization can benefit from instrumentation and anchors developed to assist with arthroscopic techniques. Understanding the history and evolution behind the procedure not only allows the surgeon to appreciate principles behind an arthroscopic approach, but also permits the utilization of an open approach when required by patient pathology and risk factors.

Clinical Significance Thresholds in Primary and Revision Latarjet Procedures With Comparable Outcome Achievements

Background: Given the variability across populations and settings, defining the MCID and the PASS for the Rowe and ASOSS scores and patients undergoing primary and revision Latarjet it is essential to have accurate benchmarks relevant to these groups when interpreting clinical results. Purpose: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain during sports, Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS), and Rowe scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treatment of shoulder instability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between January 2018 and January 2020, a retrospective review of 149 patients undergoing primary Latarjet (n = 82) and revision Latarjet (n = 67) to treat shoulder instability was performed in a single institution. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The delta was defined as the change between the pre- and postoperative scores. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID and the PASS, respectively. The optimal cutoff point and the percentage of patients achieving those thresholds were also calculated. Results: The distribution-based MCIDs after primary Latarjet were 1.1, 7.5, and 9.6 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the MCID thresholds were 93.9%, 98.7%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds after primary Latarjet were ≤1, ≥90, and ≥85 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The percentages of patients who achieved PASS thresholds were 82.9%, 89%, and 86.5% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The distribution-based MCIDs after revision Latarjet were 0.6, 6.2, and 3.4 for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved MCID thresholds were 89.3%, 100%, and 100% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The PASS thresholds were ≤3, ≥87, and ≥86 after revision Latarjet for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores, respectively. The rates of patients who achieved the PASS thresholds were 88%, 88%, and 91% for the VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS, respectively. Conclusion: This study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds in VAS, Rowe, and ASOSS scores after primary and revision Latarjet procedures for treating shoulder instability. Most patients achieved MCID and PASS benchmarks, indicating successful primary and revision Latarjet procedure outcomes. These metrics can serve as valuable parameters when analyzing parameters in future studies and have the potential to enhance patient care by optimizing treatment strategies and surgical decision making.

P258: Does The Latarjet Procedure For Anterior Shoulder Instability Put Off-Track Lesions Back On Track: A Systematic Review

Abstract Introduction The Latarjet procedure is commonly used in the treatment of shoulder instability for high risk patients. The glenoid track is widened by fixing the coracoid to the anterior glenoid. In the presence of bipolar bone loss there is concern that the Latarjet procedure may not adequately address off-track lessions.The aim of this systematic review to assess whether the Latarjet procedure is sufficient to convert 'off-track' Hill-Sachs lesions back to 'on-track'. Methods A systematic review of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed in October 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of post-operative 'on-track' lesions and of recurrent instability. Changes in glenoid diameter and Hill-Sachs lesion interval were also recorded. Results A total of 5 studies were included with 187 patients. Weighted mean age was 29.2 ± 2.2 years old and 90.8% of patients were male. The mean follow-up time was 26.8 months. All patients had off-track Hill-Sachs lesions pre-operatively. 88.6% of cases were converted to on-track lesions. The overall post-operative instability rate was 4.8%. The recurrence rate was significantly greater for off-track lesions (33.3%) than for on-track lesions (4.2%), odds ratio 11.4 (3.5-37.0). The weighted mean post-operative glenoid diameter change was 8.4 ± 5.8mm. The weighted mean Hill-Sachs lesion interval was 25.6 ± 4.5mm. Conclusion The Latarjet procedure results in the majority of Hill-Sachs lesions being converted to on-track lesions. However, due to bipolar bone loss approximately 1/9 cases will remain off track. In cases of failure to return on-track, there is an unacceptably high rate of recurrent instability (33.3%).

Evaluation and conservative treatment of shoulder instability in volleyball players an overview

Background: Currently the conservative approach regarding shoulder instability in volleyball player results still be highly contested and discussed in clinical practice. To stipulate a rehabilitation treatment appropriate and personalized, it will be crucial to include the local region in the preliminary assessment compromised and the global kinetic chain, given the numerous correlations between the different body districts. Objective: Evaluate through the collection of literature the best scientific evidence regarding the evaluation and conservative treatment of shoulder instability in volleyball player to be used as an option in situations where surgical treatment would be excessive and invasive for the young athlete. Method: The research was conducted by a single operator through a review of the literature of the last 15 years in databases such as Medline, PubMed and Pedro. The research began in January 2022 and ended in March 2022. The selection of the articles was made on the basis of the reading of the title, abstract and full-text. Result: The research initially yielded 66 scientific articles but after reading the title, abstract and full-text, 19 related articles were considered. The best evidence has been sought regarding treatment protocols for shoulder instability in the athlete. Conclusion: According to the researches carried out the recommendations of the authors and the results obtained by the latter, the conservative approach plays a fundamental role in the recovery in case of shoulder instability. Most athletes have felt positive not only physically but also mentally. Despite this, more extensive studies will be needed in the future, to ensure the professional and the athlete a protocol of conservative recovery as appropriate as possible.

Anchorless Onlay Dynamic Anterior Stabilization of the Shoulder Using a Guided Posterior Double Endobutton Fixation

The treatment of shoulder instability in the presence of a subcritical glenoid defect poses challenges, as simple Bankart seems insufficient, and the Latarjet procedure may be excessive. Recently, a dynamic anterior stabilization technique involving anterior transposition of the long head of the biceps (LHB) through a subscapularis split was described for that purpose. Previously published results demonstrated good short-term results, but several technical pitfalls have also been mentioned. We describe an onlay, anchorless, and intra-articular knotless method of fixing the LHB into the anterior glenoid that provides the important stabilizing “sling effect” of the dynamic anterior stabilization while avoiding some of the pitfalls described by other techniques.

COMPARISON BETWEEN PORTALS FOR PLACEMENT OF ANCHORS IN SHOULDER INSTABILITY.

to radiographically compare the effects of anchor positioning in the arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability, in the 3- and 5-o'clock portals. retrospective study of 36 patients, operated by two shoulder surgeons at the Unimed BH hospital, between January 2013 and January 2018. Each surgeon used only one of either the 3- or the 5-o'clock portal. After postoperative radiographs we performed angle comparisons between the greatest glenoidal axis, the angle of anchor insertion and distance from the inferior pole. the 5-o'clock portal provided better placement than its 3-o'clock counterpart, which allowed for greater orthogonality in relation to the glenoid rim (p < 0.05). the 5-o'clock portal allowed for better anchor placement than the 3 o'clock one. Level of Evidence II, Clinical Trial.

Biomechanical comparison of open Bankart repair vs. conjoint tendon transfer in a 10% anterior glenoid bone loss shoulder instability model

The treatment of shoulder instability in patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss poses a difficult problem for surgeons as new evidence supports a higher failure rate when a standard arthroscopic Bankart repair is used. The purpose of this study was to compare a conjoint tendon transfer (soft-tissue Bristow) to an open Bankart repair in a cadaveric instability model of 10% glenoid bone loss. Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested using a custom testing system that allows for a 6-degree-of-freedom positioning of the glenohumeral joint. The rotator cuff muscles were loaded to simulate physiologic muscle conditions. Four conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) Bankart lesion with 10% bone loss, (3) conjoint tendon transfer, and (4) open Bankart repair. Range of motion, glenohumeral kinematics, and anterior-inferior translation at 60° of external rotation with 20 N, 30 N, and 40 N were measured in the scapular and coronal planes. Glenohumeral joint translational stiffness was calculated as the linear fit of the translational force-displacement curve. Force to anterior-inferior dislocation was also measured in the coronal plane. Repeated measures analysis of variance with a Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. A Bankart lesion with 10% bone loss increased the range of motion in both the scapular (P=.001) and coronal planes (P=.001). The conjoint tendon transfer had a minimal effect on the range of motion (vs. intact P=.019, .002), but the Bankart repair decreased the range of motion to intact (P=.9, .4). There was a significant decrease in glenohumeral joint translational stiffness for the Bankart lesion compared with intact in the coronal plane (P=.021). The conjoint tendon transfer significantly increased stiffness in the scapular plane (P=.034), and the Bankart repair increased stiffness in the coronal plane (P=.037) compared with the Bankart lesion. The conjoint tendon transfer shifted the humeral head posteriorly at 60° and 90° of external rotation in the scapular plane. The Bankart repair shifted the head posteriorly in maximum external rotation in the coronal plane. There was no significant difference in force to dislocation between the Bankart repair (75.8±6.6 N) and the conjoint tendon transfer (66.5±4.4 N) (P=.151). In the setting of subcritical bone loss, both the open Bankart repair and conjoint tendon transfer are biomechanically viable options for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability; further studies are needed to extrapolate these data to the clinical setting.

Assessment of Thresholds for Clinically Relevant Change in the Pediatric/Adolescent Shoulder Survey After Shoulder Instability Surgery: Factors Associated With Meaningful Improvement in Outcomes.

The pediatric/adolescent shoulder survey (PASS) score is a subjective measure of shoulder symptomology in younger patients. To establish the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) for the PASS score in adolescents after surgical treatment for shoulder instability. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Included were patients aged 12.5 to 23 years who underwent surgical treatment for shoulder instability and who had completed PASS forms preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The MCID was established using an anchor-based approach, with the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) as anchors. Change in PASS score between anchor groups was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. MDC with 90% confidence (MDC90) was also calculated. Range of motion and strength data at 3-month follow-up were evaluated to identify the optimal postoperative PASS score. Factors associated with improvement in PASS score beyond the MDC90 and MCID were determined in a subset of patients with ≥6-month follow-up data. A total of 95 patients were included. The mean PASS score improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively (57 ± 15 to 75 ± 16; P < .001). The anchor-based MCID ranged from 12.5 to 13.2 points, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve of 0.87 for the SANE and 0.99 for the QuickDASH. The MDC90 was 16.5 points. The optimal PASS score at 3 months after surgery was ≥85 (AUC, 0.66). Shorter duration of symptoms, lower preoperative forward elevation, and higher preoperative external rotation were associated with improvement in PASS score above the MDC90 and/or MCID for the subset of patients (n = 25) with ≥6-month follow-up data. Increased number of suture anchors, less preoperative external rotation deficit, and number of previous dislocations had a moderate effect on improvement in outcomes. A postoperative increase in PASS score of ≥16.5 points had a 90% chance of being a true-positive change, while a score change of approximately 13 points was likely clinically relevant. The optimal PASS score after surgery was ≥85. Shorter duration of symptoms, preoperative range of motion, number of surgical anchors, and number of previous dislocations were associated with achieving a clinically relevant improvement in PASS score at minimum 6 months postoperatively.

Psychological Components Of WOSI May Reflect Functional Recovery After Surgical Treatment Of Shoulder Instability

Psychological Components Of WOSI May Reflect Functional Recovery After Surgical Treatment Of Shoulder Instability

Surgical treatment of shoulder instability in active-duty service members with subcritical glenoid bone loss: Bankart vs. Latarjet.

Subcritical bone loss has been identified as a risk factor for potentially inferior outcomes following typical arthroscopic soft tissue repair. One alternative that has been presented as an option for patients with bone loss is the Latarjet, an ipsilateral coracoid transfer to the anteroinferior glenoid. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability in patients with subcritical bone loss. We hypothesize that the open Latarjet will provide higher patient-reported outcome measure scores and lower rates of dislocation. A retrospective cohort comparison of patients with anterior glenohumeral instability procedures was performed. Inclusion criteria included symptomatic anterior shoulder instability, subcritical glenoid bone loss (13.5%-24%), surgical treatment with arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet, and minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes included recurrent instability (defined as postoperative dislocation or subjective subluxation), permanent physical restrictions, Western Ontario Shoulder Index (WOSI), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Forty-seven patients were included, 25 of whom underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair and 23 patients an open Latarjet. The average bone loss was 17.8% and 19.3%, respectively. Overall, 8 patients experienced recurrent instability, 6 in the arthroscopic Bankart group and 2 in the open Latarjet group (P=.162). The average postoperative SANE score for arthroscopic Bankart group was 48% and for the open Latarjet group, 84% (P<.001). The average postoperative WOSI score for the arthroscopic Bankart group was 53.6% and for the open Latarjet group, 67.9% (P=.069). There were significantly more patients placed on permanent physical restrictions in the arthroscopic Bankart repair group (16) compared with open Latarjet (3) (P<.001). In patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss (defined as 13.5%-24%), patients treated with an open Latarjet have insignificantly higher SANE and WOSI scores and lower permanent physical restrictions than patients treated with an arthroscopic Bankart repair. We found no statistically significant difference in recurrent instability rates between the open Latarjet and arthroscopic Bankart repair (P=.162).

Management of Shoulder Instability in Patients with Underlying Hyperlaxity.

Shoulder instability in patients with underlying joint hyperlaxity can be challenging to treat. Poorly defined terminology, heterogeneous treatments, and sparse reports on clinical outcomes impair the development of best practices in this patient population. This article provides a review of the current literature regarding optimal management of patients suffering from shoulder instability with concomitant hyperlaxity of the shoulder, from isolated shoulder joint hyperlaxity to congenital hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). Current research shows specialized physiotherapy protocols focused on strengthening of periscapular muscles and improvement of sensorimotor control are a promising non-surgical therapeutic avenue in certain patients, which can be augmented by device-based intervention in select cases. If surgical treatment is warranted, arthroscopic techniques such as pancapsular shift or plication continue to demonstrate favorable outcomes and are currently considered the benchmark for success. The long-term success of more recent innovations such as coracoid process transfers, conjoint tendon transfers, subscapularis tendon augmentation, and capsular reconstruction remains unproven. For patients affected by connective tissue disorders, treatment success is generally less predictable, and the entire array of non-operative and operative interventions needs to be considered to achieve the best patient-specific treatment results. In the treatment of shoulder instability and concomitant hyperlaxity, specialized physiotherapy protocols augmented by device-based interventions have emerged as powerful, non-operative treatment options for select patients. Successful surgical approaches have been demonstrated to comprehensively address capsular redundancy, labral lesions, and incompetence of additional passive stabilizers in a patient-specific fashion, respective of the underlying connective tissue constitution.

Risk factors for unexpected admission following arthroscopic and open treatment of shoulder instability: a national database study of 11,230 cases.

Shoulder instability procedures have low morbidity; however, complications can arise that result in readmission to an inpatient healthcare facility. The purpose of this study is to identify the demographics and risk factors associated with unplanned 30-day readmission and reoperation following arthroscopic and open treatment for shoulder instability. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to find patients who underwent shoulder instability surgery from 2015 to 2019. Independent sample Student t-tests, chi-square, and (where appropriate) Fisher's exact tests were used in univariate analyses to identify demographic, lifestyle, and perioperative variables related to 30-day readmission and reoperation following repair for shoulder instability. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was subsequently performed. Of the 11,230 cases included in our sample, only 0.54% were readmitted, and 0.23% underwent reoperation within the 30-day postoperative period. Multivariate logistic regression modeling confirmed that the following patient variables were associated with statistically significantly increased odds of readmission and reoperation: open repair, congestive heart failure (CHF), and hospital length of stay. Unplanned 30-day readmission and reoperation after shoulder instability surgery is infrequent. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II, CHF, longer than average hospital length of stay, or an open procedure have higher odds of readmission than patients without those factors. Patients who have CHF, longer than average hospital length of stay, and open surgery have higher odds of reoperation than others. Arthroscopic procedures should be used to manage shoulder instability, if possible.

Evaluation of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Open Latarjet Technique for Treatment of Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation

Background: Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet procedures are the most frequent surgical treatments for shoulder instability and recurrent shoulder dislocation. Objectives: Therefore, we performed research to assess the clinical outcomes and recurrence rate of instability between both Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet techniques. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed at Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from 2021-23, comprising 74 patients, managed surgically for the condition of recurrent shoulder dislocation. The patients were allocated into two groups viz Group A and B comprising 37 patients in each, who were managed through Arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet techniques, respectively. Post-operative complications, re-occurrence and success rate were measured in terms of SSV scores. Results: Average age of patients in Arthroscopic Bankart group was 28.34+5.31 years while in open Latarjet group; it was 29.09+6.19 years. 14 (37.83%) patients of Arthroscopic Bankart repair group revealed recurrent shoulder dislocation, while no such complaint was found in the open Latarjet technique. Twenty-seven patients of Arthroscopic Bankart group showed satisfaction with the procedure and 33 out of 37 patients (89.18%) were satisfied with open Latarjet technique. Patients in open Latarjet technique group showed successful recovery of shoulder dislocation and their SSV was 87.91%, while the patients in Arthroscopic Bankart repair group showed less SSV score of 59.76%. Conclusion: Open Latarjet group patients had a greater rate of functional satisfaction, while the arthroscopic Bankart repair group showed a trend for more recurrence. Open Latarjet operation had a higher success rate and patients had a better rate of return to previous top-level sports than Arthroscopic Bankart technique. Keywords: Latarjet; Re-occurrence; Shoulder dislocation; Sports medicine; Surgical complications.

CT-scan Evaluation of Osteointegration and Osteolysis in Different Graft Types and Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Shoulder Instability.

Bone graft is often needed in treating anterior shoulder instability in glenoid bone loss and graft integration is crucial in achieving good results. This study aimed to evaluate bone graft remodeling in different techniques for shoulder anterior-inferior instability. Graft osteointegration and osteolysis were retrospectively evaluated with CT-scan imaging performed 6 to 12 months after surgery to compare the outcome of three procedures: Latarjet, bone block with allograft, and bone block with xenograft. Screw fixation and double endobuttons fixation were also compared. CT scans of 130 patients were analyzed. Of these, 30 (23%) were performed after the bone block procedure with xenograft and endobuttons fixation, 55 (42%) after the bone block procedure with allograft and endobuttons fixation, 13 (10%) Latarjet with screw fixation and 32 (25%) Latarjet with endobuttons fixation. The prevalence of osteolysis was significantly inferior (P<.01) in the bone block procedure compared to the Latarjet procedure (11.7 % vs. 28.8 %). Bone integration was higher in bone block procedures (90.5%) than in Latarjet (84.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Among the Latarjet procedures, endobuttons fixation resulted in a higher integration rate (87.5% vs. 73.6%) and lower osteolysis rate than screw fixation (24.6% vs. 38.5%), despite these differences did not reach a statistical significance. Among the bone block procedures, using a xenograft resulted in a lower osteolysis rate (6.7%) than an allograft (14.5%), but the result was not statistically significant. This study shows a significantly lower rate of graft osteolysis after bone block procedures compared to Latarjet procedure between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Moreover, our findings suggest good results in osteolysis and graft integration with xenograft compared to allograft and double endobuttons fixation compared to screw fixation, despite these differences being not-significant. Further studies on this topic are needed to confirm our results at a longer follow-up and thoroughly investigate the clinical relevance of these findings.

Fixation devices for anterior shoulder instability

PurposeOver the past 40 years, advances in the development of anchors and sutures have contributed to the improvement in surgical outcomes for treatment of shoulder instability. Important choices in surgery when treating instability include the use of knotless versus knotted suture anchors, and bony versus soft tissue reconstruction techniques.MethodsA literature review was conducted to evaluate the history of instability of the shoulder and the results of specific fixation techniques including bony and soft tissue reconstructions as well as knotted and knotless suture anchors.ResultsAs knotless suture anchors have continued to grow in popularity since their development in 2001, many studies have compared this newer technique to that of the standard knotted suture anchors. In general, these studies have demonstrated no difference in patient-reported outcome measures between the two options. Additionally, the choice of bony versus soft tissue reconstructions is patient specific as it depends on the specific pathology or combination of injuries.ConclusionIn each surgery performed for shoulder instability, it is vitally important that we try to restore normal anatomy. The normal anatomy is best established by knotted mattress sutures. However, loop laxity and tear through by the sutures in the capsule can eliminate this restoration, increasing risk of failure. Knotless anchors may allow better soft tissue fixation of the labrum and capsule to the glenoid, but without complete restoration of normal anatomy.