Treatment Of Shoulder Disorders Research Articles

Morphological Study of Dry Human Scapula and its Significance in Treatment of Shoulder Disorders

Morphological Study of Dry Human Scapula and its Significance in Treatment of Shoulder Disorders

Can Shoulder Muscle Activity Be Evaluated With Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography?

Quantitative assessment of rotator cuff muscle activity is important in the treatment of shoulder disorders. However, the known methods for assessing rotator cuff muscle activity thus far have been inaccurate, invasive, and inconvenient. (1) Does the activity of the deltoid, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles measured using ultrasound shear wave elastography have a linear correlation with muscle activity assessed using generally used methods, including isokinetic dynamometry and electromyography? (2) Does the activity of the deltoid, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles measured using shear wave elastography show good intraobserver and interobserver reliability? Twelve volunteers participated in intrasession reliability experiments. They were asked to perform isometric abduction, external rotation, and scaption contractions (defined as elevation of the arm within the plane of the scapula with neutral arm rotation) gradually increased from 0% to 75% of maximal voluntary contraction. The joint torque, electromyographic activity, and shear elastic modulus were synchronously measured in the middeltoid, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles. The validity of the elastic modulus value was assessed using regression analysis between normalized torque and electromyographic root mean square values. For intraobserver and interobserver reliability measurements, repeated experiments were performed with the same protocol. The shear elastic modulus and normalized joint torque with isokinetic dynamometry showed a linear relationship in all muscles (deltoid, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus) and each of the ultrasonography planes (longitudinal and transverse) (mean R > 0.8 and p < 0.001 for all measurements). For the supraspinatus muscle, the mean slope of the relationship between shear elastic modulus in the longitudinal plane and the normalized joint torque during scaption contraction was 1.28 ± 0.39 kPa/%MVC (mean R = 0.93 ± 0.21, p < 0.001). Furthermore, similar results were obtained in relation to electromyography root mean square values (mean R > 0.8 and p < 0.001 in all measurements). For the supraspinatus muscle, the mean slope of the relationship between shear elastic modulus in the longitudinal plane and electromyographic (EMG) root mean square was 0.96 ± 0.27 kPa/%EMG (mean R = 0.91 ± 0.08, p < 0.001). The intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were excellent in all positions (abduction, external rotation, and scaption) and in both the longitudinal and transverse ultrasonography planes (all intraclass correlation coefficients are > 0.85). Shoulder muscle activity can be noninvasively evaluated with ultrasound shear wave elastography. Clinician and scientists should consider the application of this technique in cases in which evaluation of shoulder muscle activity is required. The next step after this study will be to check the shear elastic modulus of rotator cuff muscle in patients with rotator cuff tear. We plan to evaluate the correlation between shear elastic modulus and joint torque according to tear size and fatty infiltration status of rotator cuff muscle. Shear wave electrography can be used to measure various tissue elasticities in both static and dynamic modes. It may be a useful tool to evaluate pre- and postoperative rotator cuff muscle activity in a relatively simple manner. Shoulder function after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty associated with deltoid muscle activity also may be evaluated. Changes in tissue tightness in shoulder disorders caused by increase soft tissue stiffness (ie, adhesive capsulitis and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit) can be evaluated.

Correlations of coracohumeral ligament and range of motion restriction in patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability evaluated by magnetic resonance arthrography

Evaluation of range of motion (ROM) restriction before treatment of shoulder disorders is important for predicting the final functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate correlations of thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) and ROM restriction in patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Between January 2005 and March 2015, 181 shoulders (137 male and 44 female patients; mean age, 29.3 years) with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability treated with an arthroscopic Bankart repair were enrolled in this study. We evaluated preoperative ROM, thickness of the CHL, and obliteration of the subcoracoid fat triangle on magnetic resonance arthrography. ROM measurements, including forward flexion (FF), external rotation with the arm at the side (ER), and hand behind the back (HBB), were made in a standing position. There were significant negative correlations between FF and age (P < .001) and between HBB and age (P < .001) but not between ER and age (P = .11). The thickness of the CHL significantly increased with age (P < .001). FF, ER, and HBB were significantly restricted in patients with obliteration compared with those without obliteration (P < .001, P = .004, P < .001, respectively). Obliteration of the subcoracoid fat triangle and the thickness of the CHL positively correlated with ROM restrictions, and these changes were greater with age in patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability.

Shoulder Surgery in the Elderly Patient

Elderly patients may be different from the average population in regard to the treatment of shoulder disorders. Challenges are the decreased quality of bone, tendons and cartilage, decreased blood perfusion and a generally aged biology. The advantages however are the often more realistic expectations and more cautious use of the extremity, and the limited life expectancy of prosthetic implants is a less pressing issue. Local pathologies such as in the AC-joint or long head of the biceps may also in the aged patient be treated with infiltration or arthroscopic means. If however large rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis are present, (reverse) total shoulder implants are the treatment of choice due to the high reliability and uncomplicated rehabilitation.

Shoulder acute pain in primary healthcare: is retraining effective for GP principals? SAPPHIRE--a randomized controlled trial

To address the question whether general practitioners (GPs) should receive practical training in shoulder problems and to test whether cortisone injections are better than anaesthetic injections for rotator cuff problems. A pragmatic split-plot, randomized trial with a cluster factorial design, conducted in general practices across five centres across the United Kingdom. Ninety-one practices were randomized to receive additional training in diagnosing and injecting rotator cuff problems or no additional training. Two hundred patients consulting their general practices with shoulder pain were then randomized to receive either a corticosteroid or lignocaine injection. The main outcome was score on the British Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (BSDQ). The Short-Form 36-item Health Survey and EuroQol at 12 months from entry to the trial were also scored. Over the course of the trial there was a mean difference of 0.94 (s.e. = 1.01) on the BSDQ score between the groups, with patients treated by the untrained group having a mean of 9.46 (s.e. = 0.82) and those by the trained group having a mean of 8.51 (s.e. = 0.60). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Analysing by substance injected, there was a mean difference of 0.15 (s.e. = 0.48) throughout the trial between the groups, with patients given the cortisone having a mean BSDQ of 9.67 (s.e. = 0.39) and those given lignocaine, 9.82 (s.e. = 0.39). This was not statistically significantly different. Training GPs in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder disorders does not make any difference to the outcome, in terms of pain and disability, 1 yr later. Further, there is no advantage to injecting steroid in a group with predominant rotator cuff disorder. Trial registration. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number 58537244. Trial steering committee comprised Prof. Paul Dieppe, Prof. Elaine Hay, Dr Brian Hazleman and Dr Kerenza Hood.

Beach chair position with instrumental distraction for arthroscopic and open shoulder surgeries

Arthroscopy is widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder disorders. It can be performed in the lateral or sitting position (beach chair). Both have advantages and disadvantages. We present a simple, inexpensive, versatile, portable, continuous distraction device for arthroscopic, combined, and open shoulder surgeries in the sitting position that offers the advantages of the 2 classic positions without their disadvantages. The device was used in 101 consecutive procedures: 61 rotator cuff repairs (29 arthroscopic, 18 mini-open, 14 open), 4 two-part humeral fractures, 1 septic arthritis, 3 calcifying tendinitis, 9 capsular releases, 8 Bankart repairs (6 arthroscopic, 2 open), 13 acromioplasty and biceps tenotomy, and 2 superior labrum anteroposterior repairs. Our experience with this device is extremely positive. We have had no complications and have used it for shoulder arthroscopy, open, and combined surgeries. We have also not had difficulty visualizing or approaching the glenohumeral and subacromial spaces in the treatment of shoulder disorders. It is a safe, practical, easy, and fast set up. Its versatility makes it particularly helpful for the less experienced arthroscopic surgeon.

Two Pragmatic Trials of Treatment for Shoulder Disorders in Primary Care: Generalisability, Course, and Prognostic Indicators

Two Pragmatic Trials of Treatment for Shoulder Disorders in Primary Care: Generalisability, Course, and Prognostic Indicators

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Subjective Shoulder Scale in Patients with Shoulder Instability, Rotator Cuff Disease, and Glenohumeral Arthritis

Outcomes assessment after the treatment of shoulder disorders has involved the use of various condition-specific outcome instruments. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness to change were determined for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scale within subsets of an overall study population of 455 patients with shoulder instability, 474 patients with rotator cuff disease, and 137 patients with glenohumeral arthritis. There was acceptable test-retest reliability for the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scale (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.94) and ten of eleven domains. There was acceptable internal consistency for patients with instability (Cronbach alpha = 0.61), rotator cuff disease (0.64), and arthritis (0.62). There were acceptable floor and ceiling effects for patients with instability (0% and 1.3%, respectively), rotator cuff disease (0% for both), and arthritis (0% for both). There was acceptable and appropriate criterion validity, with significant correlations (p < 0.05) between the overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale and the physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain domains of the Short Form-12 scale, and nonsignificant correlations (p > 0.05) with the role-emotional, mental health, vitality, and social function domains. There was acceptable construct validity, with all twenty-three hypotheses demonstrating significance (p < 0.05), and acceptable responsiveness to change for patients with instability (standardized response mean, 0.93), rotator cuff disease (1.16), and arthritis (1.11). The use of outcome instruments with psychometric properties that have been vigorously established is essential. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale demonstrated overall acceptable psychometric performance for outcomes assessment in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis.

Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain

Background The prevalence of shoulder disorders has been reported to range from seven to 36% of the population (Lundberg 1969) accounting for 1.2% of all General Practitioner encounters in Australia (Bridges Webb 1992). Substantial disability and significant morbidity can result from shoulder disorders. While many treatments have been employed in the treatment of shoulder disorders, few have been proven in randomised controlled trials. Physiotherapy is often the first line of management for shoulder pain and to date its efficacy has not been established. This review is one in a series of reviews of varying interventions for shoulder disorders, updated from an earlier Cochrane review of all interventions for shoulder disorder. Objectives To determine the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions for disorders resulting in pain, stiffness and/or disability of the shoulder. Search methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Clinical Trials Regiter and CINAHL were searched 1966 to June 2002. The Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group's search strategy was used and key words gained from previous reviews and all relevant articles were used as text terms in the search. Selection criteria Each identified study was assessed for possible inclusion by two independent reviewers. The determinants for inclusion were that the trial be of an intervention generally delivered by a physiotherapist, that treatment allocation was randomised; and that the study population be suffering from a shoulder disorder, excluding trauma and systemic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Data collection and analysis The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed by two independent reviewers according to a list of predetermined criteria, which were based on the PEDro scale specifically designed for the assessment of validity of trials of physiotherapy interventions. Outcome data was extracted and entered into Revman 4.1. Means and standard deviations for continuous outcomes and number of events for binary outcomes were extracted where available from the published reports. All standard errors of the mean were converted to standard deviation. For trials where the required data was not reported or not able to be calculated, further details were requested from first authors. If no further details were provided, the trial was included in the review and fully described, but not included in the meta-analysis. Results were presented for each diagnostic sub group (rotator cuff disease, adhesive capsulitis, anterior instability etc) and, where possible, combined in meta-analysis to give a treatment effect across all trials. Main results Twenty six trials met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable and trial populations were generally small (median sample size = 48, range 14 to 180). Exercise was demonstrated to be effective in terms of short term recovery in rotator cuff disease (RR 7.74 (1.97, 30.32), and longer term benefit with respect to function (RR 2.45 (1.24, 4.86). Combining mobilisation with exercise resulted in additional benefit when compared to exercise alone for rotator cuff disease. Laser therapy was demonstrated to be more effective than placebo for adhesive capsulitis (RR 8, 95%CI 2.11 to 30.34) but not for supraspinatus tendinitis (RR 2, 95%CI 0.98 to 4.09). Both ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy resulted in improvement compared to placebo in pain in calcific tendinitis (RR 1.81 (1.26, 2.60) and RR 19 (1.16, 12.43) respectively). There is no evidence of the effect of ultrasound in shoulder pain (mixed diagnosis), adhesive capsulitis or rotator cuff tendinitis. When compared to exercises, ultrasound is of no additional benefit over and above exercise alone. There is some evidence that for rotator cuff disease, corticosteroid injections are superior to physiotherapy and no evidence that physiotherapy alone is of benefit for adhesive capsulitis Authors' conclusions The small sample sizes, variable methodological quality and heterogeneity in terms of population studied, physiotherapy intervention employed and length of follow up of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions results in little overall evidence to guide treatment. There is evidence to support the use of some interventions in specific and circumscribed cases. There is a need for trials of physiotherapy interventions for specific clinical conditions associated with shoulder pain, for shoulder pain where combinations of physiotherapy interventions, as well as, physiotherapy interventions as an adjunct to other, non physiotherapy interventions are compared. This is more reflective of current clinical practice. Trials should be adequately powered and address key methodological criteria such as allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessor.

Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain.

The prevalence of shoulder disorders has been reported to range from seven to 36% of the population (Lundberg 1969) accounting for 1.2% of all General Practitioner encounters in Australia (Bridges Webb 1992). Substantial disability and significant morbidity can result from shoulder disorders. While many treatments have been employed in the treatment of shoulder disorders, few have been proven in randomised controlled trials. Physiotherapy is often the first line of management for shoulder pain and to date its efficacy has not been established. This review is one in a series of reviews of varying interventions for shoulder disorders, updated from an earlier Cochrane review of all interventions for shoulder disorder. To determine the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions for disorders resulting in pain, stiffness and/or disability of the shoulder. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Clinical Trials Regiter and CINAHL were searched 1966 to June 2002. The Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group's search strategy was used and key words gained from previous reviews and all relevant articles were used as text terms in the search. Each identified study was assessed for possible inclusion by two independent reviewers. The determinants for inclusion were that the trial be of an intervention generally delivered by a physiotherapist, that treatment allocation was randomised; and that the study population be suffering from a shoulder disorder, excluding trauma and systemic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. The methodological quality of the included trials was assessed by two independent reviewers according to a list of predetermined criteria, which were based on the PEDro scale specifically designed for the assessment of validity of trials of physiotherapy interventions. Outcome data was extracted and entered into Revman 4.1. Means and standard deviations for continuous outcomes and number of events for binary outcomes were extracted where available from the published reports. All standard errors of the mean were converted to standard deviation. For trials where the required data was not reported or not able to be calculated, further details were requested from first authors. If no further details were provided, the trial was included in the review and fully described, but not included in the meta-analysis. Results were presented for each diagnostic sub group (rotator cuff disease, adhesive capsulitis, anterior instability etc) and, where possible, combined in meta-analysis to give a treatment effect across all trials. Twenty six trials met inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable and trial populations were generally small (median sample size = 48, range 14 to 180). Exercise was demonstrated to be effective in terms of short term recovery in rotator cuff disease (RR 7.74 (1.97, 30.32), and longer term benefit with respect to function (RR 2.45 (1.24, 4.86). Combining mobilisation with exercise resulted in additional benefit when compared to exercise alone for rotator cuff disease. Laser therapy was demonstrated to be more effective than placebo (RR 3.71 (1.89, 7.28) for adhesive capsulitis but not for rotator cuff tendinitis. Both ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy resulted in improvement compared to placebo in pain in calcific tendinitis (RR 1.81 (1.26, 2.60) and RR 19 (1.16, 12.43) respectively). There is no evidence of the effect of ultrasound in shoulder pain (mixed diagnosis), adhesive capsulitis or rotator cuff tendinitis. When compared to exercises, ultrasound is of no additional benefit over and above exercise alone. There is some evidence that for rotator cuff disease, corticosteroid injections are superior to physiotherapy and no evidence that physiotherapy alone is of benefit for Adhesive Capsulitis The small sample sizes, variable methodological quality and heterogeneity in terms of population studied, physiotherapy intervention employed and length of follow up of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions results in little overall evidence to guide treatment. There is evidence to support the use of some interventions in specific and circumscribed cases. There is a need for trials of physiotherapy interventions for specific clinical conditions associated with shoulder pain, for shoulder pain where combinations of physiotherapy interventions, as well as, physiotherapy interventions as an adjunct to other, non physiotherapy interventions are compared. This is more reflective of current clinical practice. Trials should be adequately powered and address key methodological criteria such as allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessor.

A novel device for active shoulder rehabilitation with glenohumeral traction or compression

The equipment available for rehabilitation of patients with joint conditions still lacks a device that, in common with usual physiotherapeutic measures (manipulation, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, Bobath therapy), is based on traction and/or compression or oscillating forms. The novel "Shoulder Rotator" is such a simple device for the variable treatment of shoulder disorders in all three spatial dimensions. After individual instruction, the patient performs rotating glenohumeral exercises with simultaneous glenohumeral joint traction, compression, or oscillations against static or dynamic resistance. The "Shoulder Rotator" is similar to the established continuous passive motion device for the shoulder and is mounted on a mobile chair. The electronic device control is computerised and permits a wide variety of treatment options, individual regimes, and documentation. The oscillating, compression/distraction mode of operation provides an analgesic effect. The isolated compression mode along the rotatory axis enables conditioning of joint proprioception. The distraction mode along the rotatory axis facilitates muscular relaxation. Resistive rotatory exercises strengthen the rotatory glenohumeral muscles and help centre the humeral head in the glenoid. In addition to the advantage of adding documentation of treatment progress as required for evidence-based medicine, this novel device may bring about a cost-effective, genuine quality improvement in shoulder rehabilitation.

Considering Patellofemoral Pain

HealthSouth Sports Medicine Houston, Texas Ron M. Johnson is a physical therapist at HealthSouth Sports Medicine in Houston, Texas. Ron specializes in the rehabilitation and strengthening of collegiate and professional athletes and in the treatment of shoulder disorders. He has a masters in physical therapy from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas. Ron also works in the sports medicine department at the University of Houston. Tim R. Poppe is a physical therapist and clinical coordinator at HealthSouth Sports Medicine in Houston, Texas. Tim specializes in the rehabilitation and strengthening of collegiate and professional athletes and in the treatment of knee pathologies. He has a masters in physical therapy from the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas.

Shoulder arthroscopy: current indications and techniques.

The role of arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder disorders is evolving. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression is an alternative to open anterior acromioplasty in the treatment of chronic stage II impingement syndromes prior to the development of full thickness rotator cuff tear. Patients with massive and otherwise unrepairable cuff tears have achieved significant pain relief from arthroscopic decompression and debridement of the floppy and irregular cuff margins. Routine repairable full thickness cuff tears are best treated by open reconstruction. The arthroscope is an adjunct in confirming the diagnosis and direction of shoulder instability. Arthroscopic stabilization is most feasible when the anterior glenohumeral ligament/labral complex is detached. The introduction of a metal staple is controversial, however, reported complications are diminishing with experience. Alternate methods of stabilization are being investigated. Effective arthroscopic techniques have been established for the removal of loose bodies, the treatment of calcific tendinitis, septic arthritis, and other disorders. Shoulder arthroscopy will undoubtedly achieve an appropriate place in the armamentarium of the orthopedic surgeon.

Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder instability in athletes.

Glenohumeral joint instability is a fairly common clinical disorder in athletes, especially in sports that involve the throwing motion. The direction of shoulder instability can be anterior, inferior, posterior, or multidirectional. The cause can be trauma, congenital laxity, or voluntary muscle action. Normal shoulders that have been disrupted by injury respond well to surgical correction. Shoulders that have inherently lax supporting structures, as found in patients with atraumatic and voluntary dislocation, have less consistent success with surgical repair. A common condition encountered in the shoulder of a throwing arm is anterior subluxation, which can be diagnosed by the positive apprehension sign and confirmed by arthroscopy. A torn glenoid labrum is a common injury also. Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder disorders has been made recently by arthroscopy which allows direct visualization of the joint; many conditions can now be corrected by means of arthroscopic surgery. Radiographic techniques have also been improved.