Treatment Of Severe COVID-19 Patients Research Articles

Superoxide dismutase alterations in COVID-19: implications for disease severity and mortality prediction in the context of omicron variant infection.

In the few reports to date, the changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD), a key factor in cellular protection against superoxide, in COVID-19 have been very inconsistent and contradictory. There is also a lack of data on COVID-19 induced by Omicron variant. Further investigation is warranted to figure out SOD alterations in COVID-19, particularly within the context of ongoing Omicron variant infection, which may provide clues to its role within COVID-19 pathogenesis and open up new avenues for COVID-19 treatment. SOD activity in 109 COVID-19 patients (including 46 severe cases and 63 mild to moderate cases) and 30 matched healthy controls were quantified. Demographic data, blood cell counts, biochemical indicators, coagulation indicators, and inflammatory markers were also recorded. SOD, an important key node, experienced a significant decrease in COVID-19, with the severe patients exhibiting lower activity compared to the mild to moderate patients and control healthy. Notably, severe patients who deceased had the lowest SOD activity. Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between SOD and inflammatory markers, organ injury markers, coagulation dysfunction indicators, nutritional markers, and lymphocytes counts. The ROC curve also showed good performance for the differentiation of severe cases and the prediction of death. SOD activity was significantly decreased in COVID-19 infected with Omicron variant and significantly correlated with systemic changes, and could be used as a biomarker to assess disease severity and predict mortality in COVID-19 clinical pathway management. Additionally, this finding will contribute to exploring new potential direction for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients.

The role of methylprednisolone in severe COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of methylprednisolone in severe COVID-19. PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for literatures comparing methylprednisolone and control treatment in severe COVID-19 patients. Statistical pooling was reported as risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The outcomes of interest in the literature survey were mortality and adverse events. A total of 13 studies were included, including 3,138 patients with severe COVID-19, of which 1,634 patients were treated with methylprednisolone and 1,504 patients were treated with control treatment. Five of the 13 studies reported severe adverse events. Our meta-analysis indicates that methylprednisolone treatment in COVID-19 patients is associated with a significant reduction in mortality (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.85, p = 0.003) compared to control treatment, without an increased risk of adverse events (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.92-1.56, p = 0.17). Moreover, high-dose methylprednisolone treatment (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.40-0.82, p = 0.003) and short-course methylprednisolone treatment (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.89, p = 0.01) found to significantly reduce mortality. Additionally, it was found that younger severe COVID-19 patients (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p = 0.01) had better outcomes to methylprednisolone than older patients. Methylprednisolone was correlated with lower mortality compared with control treatment in severe COVID-19 patients without increasing serious adverse reactions. Furthermore, high-doses and short-term of methylprednisolone treatment were linked with better younger COVID-19 reported higher benefit from methylprednisolone than older COVID-19 patients.

Use of Multiple Doses of Intravenous Infusion of Umbilical Cord-Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Literature Review.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical complication in severe COVID-19 patients. The intravenous infusion (IVF) of umbilical cord- (UC-) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), validated to substantially reduce the release of several inflammatory cytokines in vivo, was also shown to exhibit benefits in improving hypoxemia among severe COVID-19 patients. A single dose of IVF-UC-MSCs therapy for severe COVID-19 patients was shown to alleviate the initial ARDS severity, but have 50%-67% case-fatality rates. In Taiwan, few adult patients with severe COVID-19-induced ARDS receiving compassionate adjuvant treatment consisting of either a single dose (1-10 × 106 cells/kg body weight (kg BW)) or three doses (5 × 106 cells/kg BW in each dose) of IVF-UC-MSCs had good outcomes. However, the optimal dosage and rounds of IVF-UC-MSCs administration for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS are undetermined. We reviewed the 2020-2022 PubMed literature database concerning the clinical efficacy of IVF-UC-MSCs among severe COVID-19 patients. The data of COVID-19 case series in the PubMed literature revealed a notable heterogeneity in the therapeutic dosage (a single dose: 1-10 × 106 cells/kg BW; and three doses: 50-200 × 106 cells/kg BW in each dose) and the post-ARDS days of IVF-UC-MSCs administration (a single dose: 1-12; and multiple doses: 5-14) for the treatment of severe COVID-19-associated ARDS. The survival rates among these severe COVID-19 patients ranged from 50% to 76%. However, an overall rate of 93.1% of significant improvement in hypoxemia was observed for the COVID-19 survivors receiving IVF-UC-MSCs at the initial ARDS stage. According to our analysis, the ideal treatment dosage of IVF-UC-MSCs for severe COVID-19-induced ARDS is likely 5 × 106 cells/kg BW for three cycles within 5 days of ARDS onset in severe COVID-19 patients.

Effectiveness and safety of normoxic allogenic umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells administered as adjunctive treatment in patients with severe COVID-19

Inflammatory response in COVID-19 contributes greatly to disease severity. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) have the potential to alleviate inflammation and reduce mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 patients. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of normoxic-allogenic umbilical cord (NA-UC)-MSCs as an adjunctive treatment in severe COVID-19 patients. A double-blind, multicentric, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving severe COVID-19 patients was performed from January to June 2021 in three major hospitals across Java, Indonesia. Eligible participants (n = 42) were randomly assigned to two groups (1:1), namely the intervention (n = 21) and control (n = 21) groups. UC-MSCs dose was 1 × 106 /kg body weight on day D0, D3, and D6. The primary outcome was the duration of hospitalization. Meanwhile, the secondary outcomes were radiographical progression (Brixia score), respiratory and oxygenation parameters, and inflammatory markers, in addition to the safety profile of NA-UC-MSCs. NA-UC-MSCs administration did not affect the length of hospital stay of severe COVID-19 patients, nor did it improve the Brixia score or mMRC dyspnoea scale better than placebo. Nevertheless, NA-UC-MSCs led to a better recuperation in oxygenation index (120.80 ± 72.70 baseline vs. 309.63 ± 319.30 D + 22, p = 0.038) and oxygen saturation (97.24 ± 4.10% vs. 96.19 ± 3.75% in placebo, p = 0.028). Additionally, compared to the placebo group, the treatment group had a significantly smaller increase in PCT level at D + 22 (1.43 vs. 12.76, p = 0.011). No adverse effects, including serious ones, were recorded until D + 91. NA-UC-MSCs therapy is a very safe adjunct for COVID-19 patients. It improves the oxygenation profile and carries potential to suppress inflammation.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoids treatment in severe COVID-19: methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone

ObjectiveThe preferred agent of glucocorticoids in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.MethodsBy searching the electronic literature database including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, the clinical studies comparing methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in the treatment of severe COVID-19 were selected according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted and literature quality was assessed. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. The secondary outcomes were the rates of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, hospital stay, and the incidence of severe adverse events. Statistical pooling applied the fixed or random effects model and reported as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1.0.ResultsTwelve clinical studies were eligible, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine non-RCTs. A total of 2506 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed, of which 1242 (49.6%) received methylprednisolone and 1264 (50.4%) received dexamethasone treatment. In general, the heterogeneity across studies was significant, and the equivalent doses of methylprednisolone were higher than that of dexamethasone. Our meta-analysis showed that methylprednisolone treatment in severe COVID-19 patients was related to significantly reduced plasma ferritin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio compared with dexamethasone, and that no significant difference in other clinical outcomes between the two groups was found. However, subgroup analyses of RCTs demonstrated that methylprednisolone treatment was associated with reduced short-term mortality, and decreased CRP level compared with dexamethasone. Moreover, subgroup analyses observed that severe COVID-19 patients treated with a moderate dose (2 mg/kg/day) of methylprednisolone were related to a better prognosis than those treated with dexamethasone.ConclusionsThis study showed that compared with dexamethasone, methylprednisolone could reduce the systemic inflammatory response in severe COVID-19, and its effect was equivalent to that of dexamethasone on other clinical outcomes. It should be noted that the equivalent dose of methylprednisolone used was higher. Based on the evidence of subgroup analyses of RCTs, methylprednisolone, preferably at a moderate dose, has an advantage over dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.

Predictors of Clinical Efficacy of Cytokine Hemoadsorption in COVID-19 (Clinical Trial)

Materials and methods. This study analyzed the results of treatment of 62 patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit using selective hemoadsorption of cytokines. All patients with severe COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit within 14 days from the disease onset were subdivided into two groups. Group 1 patients (n=32) received on a top of standard treatment the hemoperfusion (HP) procedure for 4 hours, for 2–3 days in a row, using a cytokine sorption column composed of mesoporous styrene-divinilbenzen copolymer matrix. Group 2 patients were not subjected to extracorporeal blood purification. All patients received IL-6 inhibitors at a baseline in accordance to the temporary guidelines. We evaluated factors of unfavorable outcomes by analyzing changes in biochemical markers of systemic inflammatory response and mortality rates in patients of both groups.Results. Initiation of HP later than 10 days from NCI onset (P < 0.001), length of stay in the ICU, extent of lung damage (P = 0.036) and the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score (P = 0.009) were the most powerful predictors of unfavorable outcome. Levels of systemic inflammatory response markers (interleukin- 6, CRP, D-dimer) in both groups did not significantly affect the survival rates and length of hospital stay (P > 0.05). HP group demonstrated better survival (P < 0.05). Mean hospital stay was 31 and 27 days, ICU stay — 11 and 8 days for Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05).Conclusion. Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with HP using novel domestic hemosorbent composed of styrene-divinilbenzen copolymer matrix resulted in decrease in CRP levels on the first day after application and, with early onset, contributed to a significant increase in survival and decreased hospital and ICU stay. Additional studies are warranted to clarify the optimal timing of the initiation of HP in severe COVID-19 patients.

Elevation of truncated (48 kDa) form of unconventional myosin 1C in blood serum correlates with severe Covid-19

In Covid-19 and autoimmune patients, there are several similarities revealed in the immune responses (Liu et al., 2021; Woodruff et al., 2020). Earlier, we firstly detected a truncated (48 kDa) form of the unconventional Myosin 1C (48/Myo1C) in a fraction of proteins soluble in 10% 2,2,2-trichloroacetic acid (TCA). These proteins were obtained from blood serum of patients with autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis (Kit et al., 2018). Here, we demonstrated that content of 48/Myo1C was also elevated in blood serum of the severe Covid-19 patients. Whereas in blood of 28 clinically healthy human individuals regularly tested for Covid-19 infection, the amount of this protein was undetectable or very low, in blood of 16 of 28 patients hospitalized with severe course of this disease, its amount was significantly increased. Dexamethasone, steroid hormone which is widely used for treatment of severe Covid-19 patients, induced time-dependent elevation of the 48/Myo1C in blood of such patients. The 48/Myo1C dose-dependently suppressed the viability of anti-CD3-activated lymphocytes of human peripheral blood. Recently, we used affinity chromatography on the magnetic poly(glycidyl-methacrylate) (mag-PGMA–NH2) microparticles functionalized with Myo1C and MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry with molecular modeling in silico in order to identify potential molecular partners of the 48/Myo1C. It was found that 48/Myo1C might bind to component 3 of the complement system and the anti-thrombin-III (Starykovych et al., 2021). Thus, the mechanisms of the pathogenic action of truncated form of Myo1C in severe COVID-19 patients may involve a suppression of the immune cells, as well as modulation of complement and coagulation cascades.

Severe COVID-19-A Review of Suggested Mechanisms Based on the Role of Extracellular Matrix Stiffness.

The severity of COVID-19 commonly depends on age-related tissue stiffness. The aim was to review publications that explain the effect of microenvironmental extracellular matrix stiffness on cellular processes. Platelets and endothelial cells are mechanosensitive. Increased tissue stiffness can trigger cytokine storm with the upregulated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin IL-6, and tissue integrity disruption, leading to enhanced virus entry and disease severity. Increased tissue stiffness in critically ill COVID-19 patients triggers platelet activation and initiates plague formation and thrombosis development. Cholesterol content in cell membrane increases with aging and further enhances tissue stiffness. Membrane cholesterol depletion decreases virus entry to host cells. Membrane cholesterol lowering drugs, such as statins or novel chitosan derivatives, have to be further developed for application in COVID-19 treatment. Statins are also known to decrease arterial stiffness mitigating cardiovascular diseases. Sulfated chitosan derivatives can be further developed for potential use in future as anticoagulants in prevention of severe COVID-19. Anti-TNF-α therapies as well as destiffening therapies have been suggested to combat severe COVID-19. The inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells pathway must be considered as a therapeutic target in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients. The activation of mechanosensitive platelets by higher matrix stiffness increases their adhesion and the risk of thrombus formation, thus enhancing the severity of COVID-19.

Machine learning to analyse omic-data for COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis

BackgroundWith the global spread of COVID-19, the world has seen many patients, including many severe cases. The rapid development of machine learning (ML) has made significant disease diagnosis and prediction achievements. Current studies have confirmed that omics data at the host level can reflect the development process and prognosis of the disease. Since early diagnosis and effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients remains challenging, this research aims to use omics data in different ML models for COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. We used several ML models on omics data of a large number of individuals to first predict whether patients are COVID-19 positive or negative, followed by the severity of the disease.ResultsOn the COVID-19 diagnosis task, we got the best AUC of 0.99 with our multilayer perceptron model and the highest F1-score of 0.95 with our logistic regression (LR) model. For the severity prediction task, we achieved the highest accuracy of 0.76 with an LR model. Beyond classification and predictive modeling, our study founds ML models performed better on integrated multi-omics data, rather than single omics. By comparing top features from different omics dataset, we also found the robustness of our model, with a wider range of applicability in diverse dataset related to COVID-19. Additionally, we have found that omics-based models performed better than image or physiological feature-based models, proving the importance of the omics-based dataset for future model development.ConclusionsThis study diagnoses COVID-19 positive cases and predicts accurate severity levels. It lowers the dependence on clinical data and professional judgment, by leveraging the utilization of state-of-the-art models. our model showed wider applicability across different omics dataset, which is highly transferable in other respiratory or similar diseases. Hospital and public health care mechanisms can optimize the distribution of medical resources and improve the robustness of the medical system.

Dapsone Lowers Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the ICU.

Some physicians use dapsone as part of the standard treatment of severe COVID-19 patients entering the ICU, though some do not. To obtain an indication of whether dapsone is helping or not, we undertook a retrospective chart review of 29 consecutive ICU COVID-19 patients receiving dapsone and 30 not receiving dapsone. As we previously reported, of those given dapsone, 9/29 (30%) died, while of those not given dapsone, 18/30 (60%) died. We looked back on that data set to determine if there might be basic laboratory findings in these patients that might give an indication of a mechanism by which dapsone was acting. We found that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decreased in 48% of those given dapsone and in 30% of those not given dapsone. We concluded that dapsone might be lowering that ratio. We then reviewed collected data on neutrophil related inflammation pathways on which dapsone might act as presented here. As this was not a controlled study, many variables prevent drawing any conclusions from this work; a formal, randomized controlled study of dapsone in severe COVID-19 is warranted.

Abstract 5274: Mechanisms of action (MOA) for proxalutamide, an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, for the treatment of mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 patients

Abstract As of November 2021, there were 21 million confirmed active cases of COVID-19, including 77,016 patients in serious or critical condition (virusncov.com). However, there are no effective oral drugs for the treatment of severe COVID 19 patients. We here discuss the mechanism of action for Proxalutaminde to treat mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 Patients. Cellular entry and infection of SARS-CoV-2 virus are mediated by two key proteins in host cells, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a host transmembrane protein, providing the binding sites for SARS-CoV-2 on the host cell surface, and transmembrane protease serine 2 protein (TMPRSS2), priming the S protein of SARS-Cov-2 to facilitate the viral entry into the host cells. Both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 proteins are regulated by androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Previously, Proxalutamide has been reported to downregulate the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in cells derived from prostate, lung cancer and normal lung epithelial cells. In this study, we demonstrate that Proxalutamide inhibited the infection of SARS-COV-2 wild type, alpha and delta variants, with IC50s of 69, 48 and 39 nM, respectively. Moreover, Proxalutamide reduced SARS-COV-2 viral load in outpatients with COVID-19 (82% viral RT-PCR negative rate in active group vs. 31% in placebo group after treatment for 7 days (p-value<0.0001). Severe COVID-19 disease leads to cytokine storm resulting in pulmonary inflammation and extensive damage in lung and other organs. Anti-inflammatory drugs, including Baricitinib and dexamethasone, have shown limited clinical benefit for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Therefore, more effective drugs are in urgent need for patients suffering from severe COVID-19. Recently, Proxalutamide has been reported to reduce the mortality rate (HR=0.16) and lung injury (by 57%, active drug vs placebo groups) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in an IIT phase III study. We presented here the mechanism of action of Proxalutamide for targeting cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients. Proxalutamide was demonstrated to activate nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in macrophages, which stimulates the antioxidant response element (ARE) for reducing cytokine storm-induced organ damage in COVID-19. In addition, Proxalutamide inhibited TNF alpha and IL-6 expression and blocked INF gamma signaling by downregulating STAT1 expression in immune cells. Importantly, Proxalutamide reduced inflammatory cells in lungs in a Poly (I:C), pseudoviral induced-lung injury animal models. Further, Proxalutamide decreased C-reactive protein, D-Dimer and improved lymphocyte count, biomarkers for COVID-19 progression in clinical studies. Together, these results provide a strong rationale for the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with Proxalutamide. Citation Format: Liandong Ma, Youzhi Tong, Qianxiang Zhou, Hongha Yan, Xiaodan Hou, Zhiha Ren, Jiangwei Li, Huiyuan Wang, Weidong Qian, Yu Zhang, Andy Goren, Arul Chinnaiyan. Mechanisms of action (MOA) for proxalutamide, an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, for the treatment of mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5274.

Molecular mechanisms of dexamethasone-mediated modulation of inflammatory and interferon responses in severe COVID-19 patients.

Abstract Severe COVID-19 is characterized by cytokine storm, an excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which results in acute lung damage and death. Dexamethasone (Dex), a corticosteroid administered as a standard of care for severe COVID-19, has been shown to reduce the onset of severe complications in these patients. However, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of Dex are poorly understood. We conducted a transcriptomic analysis (NanoString) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from COVID-19 patients with mild (no hospitalization) and severe (on ventilator in the ICU) disease. The latter group included patients ± Dex. Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with Dex inhibited pro-inflammatory pathways, circulating cytotoxic and Th1 cells, interferon (IFN) signaling and the genes involved in cytokine storm (IL-1, IL-6 and IFN-γ), which were altered in severe vs mild disease. Pro-inflammatory immune cell functions are regulated by calcium signaling, which in turn is under the control of Kv1.3 potassium channels, but their role in the complications associated with COVID-19 remains elusive. RT-qPCR experiments in PBMCs from COVID-19 patient cohorts showed an increase in Kv1.3 expression in severe patients that was significantly reduced by Dex treatment. In agreement with these findings, in vitro treatment with Dex reduced Kv1.3 protein abundance in CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cell and CD56dim NK cells in healthy donor (HD) PBMC, while NanoString showed inhibition of pro-inflammatory genes and cytokines. Functional studies showed that Dex significantly reduced Kv1.3 activity and IFN-γ in HD T cells. Thus, our findings suggest that Kv1.3 inhibition contributes to the immunosuppression by Dex. This work was supported by Senior Pilot Grant, University of Cincinnati, Department of Internal Medicine to LC, NIH (R38HL155775 to MC) and Biospecimens and associated data were provided by the Cincinnati COVID-19 Repository at the University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

Classification and severity progression measure of COVID-19 patients using pairs of multi-omic factors

Early detection and effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients remain two major challenges during the current pandemic. Analysis of molecular changes in blood samples of severe patients is one of the promising approaches to this problem. From thousands of proteomic, metabolomic, lipidomic, and transcriptomic biomarkers selected in other research, we identify several pairs of biomarkers that after additional nonlinear spline transformation are highly effective in classifying and predicting severe COVID-19 cases. The performance of these pairs is evaluated in-sample, in a cross-validation exercise, and in an out-of-sample analysis on two independent datasets. We further improve our classifier by identifying complementary pairs using hierarchical clustering. In a result, we achieve 96–98% AUC on the validation data. Our findings can help medical experts to identify small groups of biomarkers that after nonlinear transformation can be used to construct a cost-effective test for patient screening and prediction of severity progression.

Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with either low- or high-volume of convalescent plasma versus standard of care: A multicenter Bayesian randomized open-label clinical trial (COOP-COVID-19-MCTI)

BackgroundAdministration of convalescent plasma may serve as an adjunct to supportive treatment to prevent COVID-19 progression and death. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 volumes of intravenous convalescent plasma (CP) with high antibody titers for the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19.MethodsWe conducted a Bayesian, randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in 7 Brazilian hospitals. Adults admitted to hospital with positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV2, within 10 days of the symptom onset, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard of care (SoC) alone, or in combination with 200 mL (150–300 mL) of CP (Low-volume), or 400 mL (300–600 mL) of CP (High-volume); infusion had to be performed within 24 h of randomization. Randomization was centralized, stratified by center. The primary outcome was the time until clinical improvement up to day 28, measured by the WHO ten-point scale, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Interim and terminal analyses were performed in a Bayesian framework. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04415086.FindingsBetween June 2, 2020, and November 18, 2020, 129 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SoC (n = 42), Low-volume (n = 43) or High-volume (n = 44) CP. Donors presented a median titer of neutralizing antibodies of 1:320 (interquartile range, 1:160 to 1:1088). No evidence of any benefit of convalescent plasma was observed, with Bayesian estimate of 28-day clinical improvement of 72.7% (95%CI, 58.8 to 84.7) in the SoC versus 64.1% (95%ci, 53.8 to 73.7) in the pooled experimental groups (mean difference of -8.7%, 95%CI, -24.6 to 8.2). There was one case of cutaneous mild allergic reaction related to plasma transfusion and one case of suspected transfusion-related acute lung injury but deemed not to be related to convalescent plasma infusion.InterpretationIn this prospective, randomized trial of adult hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, convalescent plasma was not associated with clinical benefits.FundingBrazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.

Tocilizumab Treatment Effect on Iron Homeostasis in Severe COVID-19 Patients

Background: Tocilizumab has been proposed as an effective treatment for severe COVID-19. We aimed to investigate whether tocilizumab administration is associated with increased availability of serum iron which may possibly be associated with adverse effects on clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed an observational, retrospective cohort study. We included adults, who were hospitalized in ICU with the diagnosis of severe COVID-19 infection eligible for tocilizumab treatment. Laboratory data including serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein levels of all patients were collected shortly before and 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after tocilizumab administration. Results: During the study period, 15 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were eligible to receive tocilizumab treatment. Tocilizumab therapy was associated with a prominent increase in serum iron and transferrin saturation levels (26 ± 13 μg/dL and 15 ± 8% before treatment and 79 ± 32 μg/dL and 41 ± 15% 72 h after treatment, respectively, p < 0.001) and decrease in serum ferritin levels (1,921 ± 2,071 ng/mL before and 1,258 ± 1,140 ng/mL 72 h after treatment, p = 0.027). Conclusion: Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab is associated with a profound increase in serum iron and ferritin saturation levels along with a decrease in ferritin levels. This may represent an undesirable side effect that may potentiate viral replication.

Cordycepin and its Nucleoside Analogs for the Treatment of Systemic COVID-19 Infection

: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new coronavirus isolated from Wuhan, China. It is a global health emergency, and there is no effective antiviral therapeutics available to date. Continuous structural genomic insights of SARS-CoV-2 proteins provide a warranty for the development of rational- based antivirals. Nevertheless, a structure-based drug candidate with multiple therapeutic actions would be a practical choice of medication in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients. Cordycepin from medicinal fungi (Cordyceps spp.) and its nucleoside analogs targeting viral RNAdependent RNA polymerase and human RNase L have potent antiviral activity against various human viruses with additional immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. Anti-inflammation treatment is of pivotal importance and should be timely tailored to the individual patient along with antivirals. Our perspective on the combined antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects of cordycepin and its analogs suggests them as new therapeutics in the treatment of systemic COVID-19 infection.

Application of Non-Invasive Ventilator in Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Since December 2019, there has been a global outbreak of COVID-19. As of the end of July 2020, more than 600,000 deaths had been reported globally. The purpose of this paper is to further explore the application of non-invasive ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients. A retrospective study was conducted to included 57 confirmed COVID-19 patients, among which 36 cases were severe. According to different oxygen inhalation methods, they were divided into non-invasive ventilator assisted ventilation group with 21 cases (group A) and 15 cases of nasal catheter oxygen inhalation group (group B). The data of respiration (RR), heart rate (HR), partial arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), partial arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and oxygenation index (OI) before the treatment of noninvasive ventilator assisted ventilation or nasal catheter oxygen treatment at 24, 48, and 72 hours of treatment of the 2 groups were collected and analyzed to determine whether the above indicators were statistically different in each time period. After 24 hours of treatment with noninvasive ventilator assisted ventilation in group A, RR gradually decreased, PaO2 and OI were significantly higher than before treatment, while after 24 hours of treatment, PaO2, RR, HR and other indexes in group B showed no significant improvement, and OI increased gradually after 48 hours of treatment, with statistically significant difference compared with that before treatment. Early adoption of non-invasive ventilation can effectively improve the hypoxic state of patients with severe COVID-19. The combination of underlying diseases will not prolong the use of non-invasive ventilation.

Efficacy of the early treatment with tocilizumab-hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab-remdesivir in severe COVID-19 Patients

BackgroundThe effectiveness of the best combination between different antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs stills an interest in the treatment of COVID19 infection. Patients and methodsA prospective randomized cohort study comprised 108 adult patients with confirmed PCR COVID 19 infection with systemic hyper inflammation state, divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen, 56 in the tocilizumab- hydroxychloroquine (TCZ-HCQ) treatment, and 52 in the tocilizumab-remdesivir (TCZ-RMV) treatment. The first group received a combination of I.V. TCZ (400–800 mg every 24 h for only two doses) and HCQ (400 mg twice in the first day then 200 mg twice for 5 days) while the second group of patients received I.V. RMV of 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg once daily infused over 60 min for 5 days with the same TCZ regimen used in the first group. All clinical parameters and laboratory investigations were assessed before and after treatment. ResultsThe CRP was significantly decreased while PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio post-treatment was significantly improved in both treatment groups. TCZ-HCQ group showed a significant decrease in the ferritin, LDH, and D. Dimer levels. The median days of hospitalization with interquartile range (IQR) were 10 (6–16) and 8 (5–12) for TCZ-HCQ and TCZ-RMV groups, respectively. The numbers of mechanically ventilated patients were 25 and 43 for TCZ-HCQ and TCZ-RMV groups, respectively. Therapeutic failure was about 26.8% in the TCZ-HCQ group and 30.8% in the TCZ-RMV group but there was no significant difference between both groups. Some complications were recognized only in TCZ-RMV following treatment including secondary bacterial infections (42.3%), myocarditis (15.4%), and finally pulmonary embolism (7.7%). ConclusionEfficacy of both TCZ-RMV and TCZ-HCQ combinations are observed in the treatment of severe COVID-19 patients; however the increased need for ICU or mechanical ventilation in the TCZ-RMV arm contributed to the appearance of cardiac and thrombotic events.The study was registered at the Clinical Trials registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04779047).

Current Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients: Review.

Coronavirus-2019 disease is a newly diagnosed infectious disease, which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus-2. It spreads quickly and has become a major public health problem throughout the world. When the viral structural spike protein binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor of the host cell membrane, the virus enters into host cells. The virus primarily affects lung epithelial cells or other target cells that express angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptors in COVID-19 patients. Chemokines released by the host cells stimulate the recruitment of different immune cells. A cytokine storm occurs when a high amount of pro-inflammatory cytokines are produced as a result of the accumulation of immune cells. In COVID-19 patients, cytokine storms are the leading cause of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent and self-renewing adult stem cells, which are obtained from a variety of tissues including bone marrow, adipose tissue, Warthon’s jelly tissue, and amniotic fluid. Mesenchymal stem cells primarily exert their important therapeutic effects through 2 mechanisms: immunoregulatory effects and differentiation capacity. Mesenchymal stem cells can release several cytokines via paracrine mechanism or by direct interaction with white blood cells such as natural killer cells, T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and macrophages, resulting in immune system regulation. Mesenchymal stem cells may help to restore the lung microenvironment, preserve alveolar epithelial cells, prevent lung fibrosis, and treat pulmonary dysfunction that is caused by COVID-19 associated pneumonia. Mesenchymal stem cells therapy may suppress aggressive inflammatory reactions and increase endogenous restoration by improving the pulmonary microenvironment. Furthermore, clinical evidence suggests that intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cells may radically reduce lung tissue damage in COVID-19 patients. With the advancement of research involving mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of COVID-19, mesenchymal stem cells therapy may be the main strategy for reducing the recent pandemic.

Differential Cytokine Responses in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Limit Efficacy of Remdesivir.

A significant proportion of COVID-19 patients will progress to critical illness requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. This accentuates the need for a therapy that can reduce the severity of COVID-19. Clinical trials have shown the effectiveness of remdesivir in shortening recovery time and decreasing progression to respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation. However, some studies have highlighted its lack of efficacy in patients on high-flow oxygen and mechanical ventilation. This study uncovers some underlying immune response differences between responders and non-responders to remdesivir treatment. Immunological analyses revealed an upregulation of tissue repair factors BDNF, PDGF-BB and PIGF-1, as well as an increase in ratio of Th2-associated cytokine IL-4 to Th1-associated cytokine IFN-γ. Serological profiling of IgG subclasses corroborated this observation, with significantly higher magnitude of increase in Th2-associated IgG2 and IgG4 responses. These findings help to identify the mechanisms of immune regulation accompanying successful remdesivir treatment in severe COVID-19 patients.