Treatment Of Radial Head Fractures Research Articles

Long-terms outcomes of radial head arthroplasty using a bipolar prosthesis.

In acute treatment of radial head fractures, a radial head prosthesis can be considered if open reduction and internal fixation are not technically feasible. We reviewed the data of 27 consecutive bipolar Judet radial head prostheses implanted in patients with unreconstructable radial head fractures and no other concomitant fractures (coronoid or olecranon factures). The lesions of the lateral collateral ligament were rated according to the McKee classification. Twenty-three patients with more than ten-year follow-up participated in this retrospective study All patients underwent assessments for pain, range of motion and stability using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the QuickDash questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Radiography assessment was performed to determine the correct setting of the implant, presence of periprosthetic loosening, prosthetic disassembly, heterotopic ossification, capitellum and ulnohumeral degenerative changes. Mean follow-up was 149 months (± 12.2). Mean range of motion in flexion-extension was 111° (± 10.55), mean extension was 18° (± 14.32) and mean flexion was 130° (± 11.4). Mean arc of motion in supination-pronation was 150° (± 12.26). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88, the mean QuickDash score was 7.3; 86% of the patients were satisfied. Seven patients (26%) required secondary surgery. The most frequent complication was heterotopic ossification, which had negative consequences on the functional result. Bipolar radial head prostheses are an option for acute treatment of isolated unreconstructable radial head fractures. During follow-up, three patients required implant revision and removal; the capitellum surface presented severe degenerative changes and the prosthesis was not replaced. Another complication was the risk of implant dislocation, in relation to implant design, incorrect positioning of the radial head stem or else to inadequate reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament. Further work is needed to establish the long-term follow-up results of Judet implants in complex elbow fractures.

Radial Head Replacement: Management of Elbow and Forearm Instability after Comminuted Radial Head Fractures Associated with Elbow Dislocation

This manuscript aims to identify an indication algorithm for the surgical treatment of radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation. The study compares the mid-term functional outcomes of patients with multifragment radial head fracture treated by resection with the outcomes of patients treated with radial head replacement. The cohort of 34 patients who sustained a radial head fracture at the mean age of 42.5 years (age range 20-81 years) was broken down into two groups by type of surgery. The EXT group consists of 20 patients with the radial head fracture treated by radial head resection. The END group includes 14 patients treated with the radial head replacement. In all patients, the radial head fracture was associated with elbow dislocation (type IV fracture according to the Mason-Johnston classification). The modified Kocher's surgical approach was used in all patients of both the groups. In the EXT group, resection of the fragmented radial head was performed. In the END group, the ExploR® Modular Radial Head System (Zimmer, Biomet, USA) was used, consisting of a CoCr (cobalt chromium) alloy head and a titanium stem. The pain and the range of motion of the elbow and forearm were evaluated after the completion of the outpatient rehabilitation (the mean follow-up period was 2.4 years). Simultaneously, the elbow joint stability was assessed. Radiographs were taken to detect heterotopic ossifications, proximalization of the radius, and any signs of prosthesis loosening. The frequency of reoperations was followed-up. The MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) was calculated. In the EXT group, the mean elbow flexion was 117.5° and the mean pronation/supination was 166.9°. In 50% of patients, the MEPS obtained was greater than 90 points, which means an excellent functional outcome. In 1 patient (5%), recurrent elbow dislocation occurred which was the reason for revision surgery (elbow transfixation with the Kirschner wires and medial collateral ligament suture). Revision surgery was also performed in 2 patients (10%) in whom not all the radial head fragments were removed. Moreover, also observed was elbow joint instability (2 patients) and temporary radial nerve paralysis (1 patient). In 1 case discrete proximalization of the radius developed. The patients in the END group showed the mean elbow flexion of 112° and the mean pronation/supination of 135°. The MEPS obtained from 69% of patients was greater than 90 points, which means an excellent outcome. The pain under load was reported by 3 patients (21%). In 5 patients (35%), the X-rays showed radiolucent zone around the stem of the prosthesis. Neither revision surgery, nor prosthesis removal has been performed yet in any patient. No instability, neurological complications or infections have been reported. In both EXT and END group heterotopic ossifications have developed in 4 patients. Radial head replacement compared to the radial head resection in the management of multifragment fractures associated with elbow dislocations increase the elbow and forearm stability. The group of patients with an implanted radial head prosthesis shows a higher percentage of patients achieving excellent functional outcome than the group of patients with radial head resection. radial head, elbow, fracture, dislocation, resection, prosthesis.

Elbow Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Radial Head Fractures: Surgical Technique and 10 Years of Follow Up Results Compared to Open Surgery

This study aimed to describe the ARIF (Arthroscopic Reduction Internal Fixation) technique for radial head fractures and to compare the results with ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) at mean 10 years. A total of 32 patients affected by Mason II or III fractures of the radial head who underwent ARIF or ORIF by screws fixation were retrospectively selected and evaluated. A total of 13 patients were treated (40.6%) by ARIF and 19 patients (59.4%) by ORIF. Mean follow-up was 10 years (7-15 years). All patients underwent MEPI and BMRS scores at follow-up, and statistical analysis was performed. No statistical significance was reported in Surgical Time (p = 0.805) or BMRS (p = 0.181) values. Significative improvement was recorded in MEPI score (p = 0.036), and between ARIF (98.07, SD ± 4.34) and ORIF (91.57, SD ± 11.67). The ARIF group showed lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially regarding stiffness (15.4% with ORIF at 21.1%). The radial head ARIF surgical technique represents a reproducible and safe procedure. A long learning curve is required, but with proper experience, it represents a tool that might be beneficial for patients, as it allows a radial head fracture to be treated with minimal tissue damage, evaluation and treatment of the concomitant lesions, and with no limitation of the positioning of screws.

Clinical study of suture anchors in the treatment of radial head fractures

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyze and study the clinical effect of suture anchors in the treatment of radial head fractures (RHFs).MethodsA total of 11 patients (five male and six female) with RHFs who were treated from March 2016 to June 2021 were included in this study. They were 17–61 (average 38.5) years old. In terms of the Johnston–Mason classification, two cases were type II, seven cases were type III, and two cases were type IV. All patients were treated with open reduction and anchor internal fixation.ResultsAll 11 patients were followed up, all incisions healed by first intention, and the duration of follow-up was 14–20 months. The average operation time was 40 ± 15 min. The clinical healing time was 4–6 (average 5) weeks. No patients had any complications, such as traumatic arthritis, malunion, nerve injury, joint stiffness, or incision infection. The clinical effects were evaluated according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The scores of all 11 cases were 90–95, all excellent.ConclusionThe application of suture anchor internal fixation in the treatment of RHFs has the advantages of accurate reduction, no need for a secondary operation to remove the fixation materials, less trauma, fewer complications, good fracture healing, and good recovery of elbow extension, flexion, and rotation functions.

Outcomes of the Posterior Approach for the Treatment of Radial Head Fractures and Associated Elbow Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study.

The lateral approach to the radial head remains the routinely used approach for surgical fixation or replacement despite the risk of injury to lateral soft tissue structures. Multiple approaches are required when dealing with complex elbow injuries involving other bony and soft tissue structures which lead to greater soft tissue dissection, prolonged immobilization, and a higher rate of elbow stiffness. This article utilizesa single posterior approach involving the Boyd interval in the surgical management of radial head fractures with an associated elbow injury. Thirteen patients with radial head fractures and related elbow injuries treated with the posterior approach to the elbow were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon and followed up for a minimum of 18 months postoperatively. Functional evaluation of the patients was performed at the final follow-up which comprised a range of movements of the elbow, visual analogue scale (VAS), Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The mean VAS score was 2.16, QuickDASH score, and Mayo elbow score were 7.15 ± 2.96 and 78.46 ± 8.26 respectively. The flexion-extension arc of the elbow was 128.46 ± 4.27 degrees and the supination-pronation arc was 133.92 ± 4.04 degrees at one-year follow-up. Two patients developed early postoperative complications (elbow stiffness and ulnar nerve neuropraxia) and recovered spontaneously. No patients developed neuropraxia of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). The single incision posterior (Boyd) approach to the elbow offers complete access to the radial head, olecranon, coronoid, and lateral ligamentous structures in complex elbow injuries and provides good functional outcomes in our small observational study.

Acute versus delayed radial head arthroplasty for the treatment of radial head fractures.

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is an important tool in the acute treatment of comminuted radial head and neck fractures. RHA is also performed in a delayed manner after failed open reduction and internal fixation, for fracture malunion or nonunion, and other chronic post-traumatic elbow disorders where restoration of the lateral column of the elbow is considered necessary. The relative efficacy and longevity of acute vs. delayed RHA is unknown. We sought to compare clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between these groups. We identified patients ≥18 years old who underwent an RHA between 2000 and 2018 and then extracted 135 total elbows with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years that sustained isolated radial head fractures (30%), terrible triad injuries (66%), or Essex-Lopresti injuries (4%). The acute cohort (RHA: <12 weeks) contained 101 elbows that underwent surgery at a mean of 0.6 weeks (range, 0 days to 7 weeks, 96%<2 weeks) from injury, whereas the delayed cohort (RHA: 12 weeks to 2 years) contained 34 elbows that underwent surgery at a mean of 36 weeks (range, 14-82 weeks) from injury. Patients in the acute group had a higher percentage of terrible triad injuries (75% vs. 40%, P<.001) and Mason 3 fractures (98% vs. 45%, P<.001). At the final follow-up, 13 of 101 patients in the acute cohort (13%) and 7 of 34 patients in the delayed cohort (21%) required implant revision or resection. A total of 25 patients (25%) in the acute cohort and 12 patients (35%) in the delayed cohort required a reoperation. Kaplan-Meier 2-year survival estimates free of implant resection or revision (90% acute, 86% delayed) and reoperation (76% acute, 70% delayed) were similar between groups. In patients with 5-year follow-up, there was an increased rate of revision or resection in the delayed group (30% vs. 13%). Two-year survival estimates free of radiographic loosening were 80% in the acute cohort vs. 57% in the delayed cohort (P=.04). Mayo Elbow Performance Score at 2 years demonstrated mean scores of 83 and 79 in the acute and delayed groups, respectively, with 71% of the acute cohort and 64% of the delayed cohort achieving good or excellent scores. Our results demonstrated that although 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival free of revision or resection estimates and reoperation rates was equivalent between the groups, the delayed group experienced worse Mayo Elbow Performance Score outcomes, a higher revision or resection rate at 5 years, and an increased rate of radiographic loosening.

Comparative Study Between the Mini-Open (≤2.5 Cm) Approach and Conventional Open Lateral Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Radial Head Fractures.

PurposeThe conventional lateral approach is widely used to treat radial head fractures with screws. However, the traditional incision may have shortcomings, including excessive exposure and significant scarring. We propose an innovative method – a mini-open lateral approach of less than 2.5 cm for surgical treatment of radial head fractures with screws.MethodsFrom Jan 2017 to Dec 2020, 34 patients diagnosed with closed radial head fracture were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in this study. The novel group (mini-open group) included 15 patients, and the other 19 patients were in the traditional group. The time of operation and the blood loss during operation were recorded. Postoperative clinical outcomes and radiographic results were recorded and compared between the two groups. The range of motion (ROM) in the elbow, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Rating Scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) score and complications, such as wound infection, vascular and nerve damage, and fragment redisplacement were observed in the two groups.ResultsIn the comparison between the two groups, there was no significant difference in age, sex, cause of radial head fracture, or other basic information. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and VAS score at 3 days postoperation were significantly reduced in the novel group (p < 0.05). The follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in MEPS, ASES, or Q-DASH scores between the two groups.ConclusionThe mini-open approach reduced intraoperative blood loss, shortened operation time, relieved patient pain, and achieved a satisfactory postoperative clinical result, which demonstrates that the novel approach is a safe and effective option for treating radial head fractures.

Current concepts in management of radial head fracture: An overview

The most frequent injury discovered so far is a radial skull fracture. The radial head fracture has become a crucial component of the elbow over the past ten years. According to a treatment plan that has evolved, the radial head fracture treatment aims to restore the wounded elbow's function and stability. A rising number of articles are available on radial head fracture. This article's goal is to give a summary of the most recent theories about the treatment of radial head fractures. Moreover, one of the most contentious elbow topics is the radial head fracture.

Radial head replacement using personalized 3D printed porous tantalum prosthesis

Fractures of the radial head account for 33% of elbow fractures. More and more studies have found that the radial head plays an important role in the normal function of the elbow joint, and many complications will occur after resection of the radial head. Accurate treatment of radial head fractures is crucially important. At this stage, commercialized radial head prosthesis of fixed size is commonly used in radial head replacement, but the mismatch of prosthesis and material problems have resulted in many complications. The three-dimensional (3D) printed porous tantalum has good biocompatibility, is conducive to bone ingrowth, has ideal elastic modulus, and can be prepared into a highly porous material that can be designed to match the radial head according to each patient's personalized anatomical structure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the elbow joint function, complications and prosthesis conditions after radial head replacement using 3D printed porous tantalum. Seven patients with comminuted fracture of radial head in our Center received radial head replacement using 3D printed porous tantalum. Patients were followed on the elbow joint function, range of motion (ROM), elbow radiographs, postoperative complications, and bone condition of tantalum metal. quality situation. Follow-up data showed that the patients had less postoperative pain, improved elbow function and ROM, and bone ingrowth in the tantalum prosthesis. The 3D printing porous tantalum can be applied to hip replacement, knee replacement, and other patients with irregular bone defects such as bone tumor, bone deformity, etc., which has the potential to realize personalized and precise treatment.

Morphometry of radial head: A guide for radial head prosthesis

Introduction: Radial head fractures constitute one-third of all elbow fractures and 20% of all trauma cases. The head, being the key element is very important for maintaining stability and biomechanics of the humeroradial joint. Treatment of radial head fractures involves fixation or replacement with radial head prosthesis. However, the designing of prosthesis requires accurate knowledge of morphometry of proximal radius for a specific population to restore normal joint mechanics and joint morphometry. Henceforth, this study was carried out to determine dimensions of radial head in the North Indian subjects. Materials and methods: The present observational study was conducted on one hundred dry adult human radii with an intact upper end. The parameters included Anteroposterior diameter of radial head (APD), Transverse diameter of radial head (TD), Medial height of radial head (MH], Lateral height of radial head (LH), Anterior height of radial head (AH), Posterior height of radial head (PH), Depth of superior articular facet (D), Surface area of head of radius (SA), Volume of head of radius (VOL), Ventral curve (VC), Dorsal curve (DC), Lateral curve (LC) and Circumference of the head (C). The side dimorphism was noted for any statistically significant side dimorphism. Results: The morphometry of radial head revealed that the APD, TD were lesser by 2mm to 3mm as compared with western studies. The VC and the PC in the western studies were lesser by 0.4mm and 0.6mm respectively as compared to the current study. Conclusions: These parameters are of importance for orthopaedic surgeons in the treatment of fractures of the upper radius, where a radial head implant or prosthesis is required. Accurately matched prosthesis in accordance with the size of head will reduce postoperative complications and result in better operative outcome. Keywords: Radial head, Radial head prosthesis, Morphometry, Humororadial joint

30-Day outcomes analysis of surgical management of radial head fractures comparing radial head arthroplasty to open reduction internal fixation

IntroductionRadial head arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation are two commonly utilized treatment options for radial head fractures. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of and risk factors for short-term complications following radial head arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation of radial head fractures. MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients that underwent radial head arthroplasty or open reduction internal fixation for radial head fractures between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2017. The incidence of various 30-day complications, including unplanned readmission, reoperation, non-home discharge, mortality, surgical/medical complications, and extended length-of-stay were compared between the two propensity matched groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for various short-term complications. ResultsAfter propensity matching, a total of 435 patients were included in our analysis. 250 patients underwent radial head arthroplasty, and 185 patients underwent open reduction internal fixation. Arthroplasty treated patients had a significantly longer mean total operative time (p = .031) and length-of-stay (p = .003). No significant 30-day complications differences were found for unplanned readmission, reoperation, non-home discharge, mortality, surgical complications or medical complications. Independent risk factors for any complications of both procedures included a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III. Significant risk factors for length-of-stay greater than two days included a history of bleeding disorder and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III. ConclusionOur study revealed there were no significant differences in 30-day perioperative surgical or medical complications from either surgical treatment of radial head fractures; however, radial head arthroplasty treated patients were met with a significantly longer length-of-stay and longer duration of operating time. We also identified risk factors that were independently associated with higher rates of complications regardless of treatment type.

169 Clinical Outcomes of Radial Head Arthroplasty as Primary Treatment for Post-traumatic Mason Type 3 and 4 Fractures: A Long-term Follow-up

Abstract Aim Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is the favoured treatment for complex radial head fractures, enabling functional restoration of elbow kinematics. However, study of long-term outcomes associated with RHA is largely neglected. This study aimed to fill the gap in the literature by firstly, assessing functional outcomes, and secondly, determining complications and rates of revision and/or removal of prosthesis associated with RHA, at our district general hospital. Method We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive single-surgeon series of patients receiving RHA as primary treatment for radial head fractures graded either 3 or 4 according to the Mason-Johnston classification between 2004 and 2009. Function at final follow-up was assessed using Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (q-DASH) score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Results 16 patients identified; 12 available for final follow-up. Mean follow-up time of 12.60 years (range: 10.67-16.08). Mean q-DASH score of 8.2 (range: 0-34.1). Mean MEPS of 85.83 (range: 50-100) with 11 (91.67%) reporting excellent/good results. All complications occurred within the first year post-operatively. Stiffness was the most common (50%) complication, but additional procedures improved objective range of movement in affected patients. Only one patient required implant revision throughout follow-up, which was due to prosthesis subluxation in the first month. Conclusions This study is amongst the first to examine clinical outcomes associated with RHA with an average follow-up &amp;gt;12 years. Our results emphasise good functional restoration and low implant failure rate. Regular follow-up particularly in the early post-operative period is essential in detecting and resolving complications.

Acute Radial Head Resection for Fracture: are We Likely to Miss an Essex-Lopresti Injury?

Given the current available evidence, surgical treatment of radial head fracture with acute resection is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether acute resection of the radial head for a radial head fracture leads to longitudinal forearm instability due to a missed Essex-Lopresti injury. A retrospective review was conducted of radial head resections performed for acute radial head fractures at two Level I trauma centers from 2000 to 2018. A total of 11 patients met inclusion criteria. Our primary outcome was a missed Essex-Lopresti injury at time of final clinical follow-up. Long-term telephone follow-up was attempted for QuickDASH, pain scores, and satisfaction scores. Of the 11 radial head fractures in this study, intraoperative radial pull tests were performed and normal in 6 patients. No patient was found to have a missed Essex-Lopresti injury at a mean of 36.2 months' clinical follow-up after radial head resection. At a mean telephone follow-up of 12.6 years in available patients, mean QuickDASH was 3.4, mean satisfaction was 9.75 out of 10, and no further complication or reoperation was reported. Our findings challenge the dogma that the radial head cannot be safely excised in the setting of acute fracture, even with elbow instability and/or wrist pain, particularly when intraoperative longitudinal stability is assessed by a stress maneuver.

Radial head fractures : Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcome

Radial head fractures account for the majority of bony injuries to the elbow. The usual clinical signs include hemarthrosis, pain and limitations in movement. The standard diagnostic tool is radiological imaging using X‑rays and for more complex fractures, computed tomography (CT). Concomitant ligamentous injuries occur more frequently than expected and must be reliably excluded. The classification is based on the modified Mason classification. Mason typeI fractures are usually treated conservatively with immobilization and early functional aftercare. Mason typeII fractures can be well-addressed by screw osteosynthesis but higher grade fractures (Mason typesIII-IV) can necessitate a prosthetic radial head replacement. In this case, prosthesis implantation is to be preferred to aradial head resection. The outcome after treatment of radial head fractures can be described as good to very good if all accompanying injuries are adequately addressed.

Surgical treatment of the radial head is crucial for the outcome in terrible triad injuries of the elbow.

To evaluate the outcomes of terrible triad injuries (TTIs) in mid-term follow-up and determine whether surgical treatment of the radial head influences clinical and radiological outcomes. Follow-up assessment of 88 patients with TTI (48 women, 40 men; mean age 57 years (18 to 82)) was performed after a mean of 4.5 years (2.0 to 9.4). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were evaluated. Radiographs of all patients were analyzed. Fracture types included 13 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 59 type III. Surgical treatment consisted of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) was performed if reconstruction was not possible. At follow-up the mean MEPS was 87.1 (20 to 100); mean OES, 36.9 (6 to 48); and mean DASH score, 18.6 (0 to 90). Mean movement was 118° (30° to 150°) for extension to flexion and 162° (90° to 180°) for pronation to supination. The overall reoperation rate was 24%, with nine ORIF, ten RHA, and two patients without treatment to the radial head needing surgical revision. When treated with RHA, Mason type III fractures exhibited significantly inferior outcomes. Suboptimal results were also identified in patients with degenerative or heterotopic changes on their latest radiograph. In contrast, more favourable outcomes were detected in patients with successful radial head reconstruction after Mason type III fractures. Using a standardized protocol, sufficient elbow stability and good outcomes can be achieved in most TTIs. Although some bias in treatment allocation, with more severe injuries assigned to RHA, cannot be completely omitted, treatment of radial head fractures may have an independent effect on outcome, as patients subjected to RHA showed significantly inferior results compared to those subjected to reconstruction, in terms of elbow function, incidence of arthrosis, and postoperative complications. As RHA showed no apparent advantage in Mason type III injuries between the two treatment groups, we recommend reconstruction, providing stable fixation can be achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1620-1628.

The Radial Floating Cup radial head prosthesis to treat radial head fractures: functional and radiographic results after more than 12years of mean follow-up.

This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of patients presenting with a radial head fracture who were treated surgically with a Judet Radial Floating Cup 2 (RFC2) radial head prosthesis. This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational, multi-operator, and continuous study performed between July 1997 and June 2009 on the treatment of radial head fracture using an RFC2 radial head prosthesis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the functional status of the operated elbow, evaluated using the Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (Quick-DASH) score and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). The secondary endpoints were mobility and stability of the operated elbow, residual pain and grip strength, nature and rate of complications, as well as possible radiographic abnormalities during follow-up. Twenty-two patients were treated with the RFC2 for radial head fractures over the study period. Three (13.6%) were lost to follow-up, including one death. Of the remaining 19 patients, three RFCs had to be removed (15.8%). The final analysis involved 16 patients. The mean follow-up was 144months (range 109-225months; standard deviation [SD] = 49.9months) or 12years. The average Quick-DASH score was 23.01/100 (range 0-50; SD = 7.8) and three cases were rated as having "excellent" results according to the MEPI (18.7%), nine cases were rated as having "good" results in (56.2%), and four cases were rated as having "average" results (25%). The average mobility values were: 132° of flexion (range 120°-150°; SD = 11), 14.5° of extension deficit (range 0°-40°; SD = 5), 84.4° of pronation (range 20°-90°; SD = 8°), and 67.7° of supination (range 25°-85°; SD = 10). All patients had a stable elbow. The average grip strength on the affected side thus corresponded to 79% (range 44-100%; SD = 8.3%) of the grip strength on the healthy side. Four patients (25%) developed complications: three cases of algodystrophic syndrome (18.7%) and one case of early dislocation (6.2%). Radiographic evaluation revealed that there was a periprosthetic radio-lucencies in eight patients (50%), periarticular ossifications in 12 patients (75%), and lysis of the capitulum in two patients. There was no significant difference in MEPI ratings between patients with and without a periprosthetic radio-lucencies (P = 0.8018). Our results indicated that using the RFC 2 prosthesis to surgically treat radial head fractures provides good long-term functional results, including satisfactory mobility and stability.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Radial Head Arthroplasty for Mason III Radial Head Fractures: Appraising the Current Literature Evidence.

Fractures of the radial head are common and account for one-third of elbow fractures. Management has evolved over the past few decades as have the techniques and implants used to treat them. However, no standardized treatment protocol exists because of the complexity with which these fractures may present. The complex, unstable, displaced, and multi-fragmentary fractures, also known as Mason type III fractures, remain one of the most challenging fractures to treat, especially if associated with other elbow injuries. There are various surgical treatment options available, including open reduction and internal fixation or radial head arthroplasty.The purpose of this study was to systematically review the current literature that assessed open reduction and internal fixation compare to radial head replacement to identify the best surgical treatment protocol for the management of Mason type III radial head fracture.All published clinical trials claiming to evaluate or cited elsewhere as being authoritative regarding the surgical treatment of radial head fractures were identified and evaluated. Studies in foreign languages (not in English) were excluded.Based on two randomized controlled trials, this review showed some weak evidence that arthroplasty results in better functional elbow outcomes and lower complication rates as compared to open reduction and internal fixation. There is a scarcity of good quality comparative studies and multicenter randomized controlled trials should be considered.

Monoblock polyethylene radial head prosthesis for the treatment of unreconstructable acute radial head fractures with a minimum 1-year follow-up: A retrospective case series

Background: Radial head arthroplasty is an alternative treatment for complex radial head fractures that are not appropriate for fixation. No study to date has reported the outcomes of monoblock ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE) radial head prosthesis (RHP) for the treatment of radial head fracture. We aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with unreconstructable acute radial head fractures treated with a monoblock UHMW-PE RHP. Methods: Patients who underwent UHMW-PE RHP placement for the treatment of radial head fracture were included in this retrospective case series. Patients who did not complete follow-up were excluded. Primary outcome measurements were the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. The latest follow-up physical examination and radiographs were evaluated for loosening, subluxation, and dislocation. Postoperative complications and need for further surgery were noted. Results: Eleven patients (four female and seven male patients) with a mean follow-up of 18.5 mo were evaluated. The mean MEPS was 79.5 (range, 65–100) at 3 mo postoperatively and 85.9 (range, 75–100) at the latest follow-up. The mean DASH score was 10.8 (range, 3–20) at 3 mo postoperatively and 8.7 (0–20) at the latest follow-up. No complications were encountered during follow-up. Conclusions: Radial head arthroplasty with a monoblock UHMW-PE RHP is safe and effective at short-term follow-up for treating acute unreconstructable radial head fractures with satisfactory functional and radiographic outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Functional outcomes evaluation after radial head arthoplasty in DR. Syaiful Anwar General Hospital: Case series

IntroductionRadial head arthroplasty (RHA) has become one of the mainstay surgical treatment for radial head fracture in certain conditions. Many previous studies compared the superiority of either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and RHA with inconclusive result. Our case series aim to evaluate the functional outcome of the patients treated with RHA in our institution. Presentation of caseWe evaluated three patients who had RHA in 2018 and 2019. The function of flexion, extension, supination and pronation of the elbow was evaluated. The range of motion (ROM) was assessed in both active and passive way. DiscussionAn abundant of literatures stated that RHA result is superior than radial head resection and ORIF. Our case series present a satisfying result on pain and a fair result on functional outcome from the range of motion (ROM) evaluation on patient follow-up. ConclusionA good follow up for post-operative care plays an important role in management of RHA to minimize the rate of complications. In this case series, the functional outcomes after RHA is good, but a larger number of patient and longer follow up duration is needed for a better analysis.

The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures

BackgroundSurgical treatment of radial head fractures is increasingly performed arthroscopically. These fractures often feature concomitant injuries to the elbow joint, which may be under-diagnosed in the radiological examinations. Little is known about the diagnostic value of arthroscopy, the treatment options that arise from arthroscopically assisted fracture fixation and clinical results. We hypothesized that arthroscopy can detect additional concomitant injuries and simultaneously expands the therapeutic options. Therefore aim of this study was to compare arthroscopic and radiologic findings, to assess the distinct arthroscopic procedures and to follow up on the clinical outcomes.MethodsTwenty patients with radial head fractures were retrospectively included in two study centers. All patients underwent elbow arthroscopy due to at least one of the following suspected concomitant injuries: osteochondral lesions of the humeral capitellum, injuries of the collateral ligaments or loose joint bodies. Preoperative radiological findings were compared to arthroscopic findings. Afterwards, arthroscopic treatment options and clinical outcomes were assessed.ResultsArthroscopic findings led to revision of the classified fracture type in 70% (p = 0.001) when compared to preoperative conventional radiographs (CR) and in 9% (p = 0.598) when compared to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diagnosis of loose bodies was missed in 60% (p < 0.001) of the CR and in 18% (p = 0.269) of the CT/MRI scans. Osteochondral lesions were not identified in 94% (p < 0.001) of the CR and in 27% (p = 0.17) of the CT/MRI scans. Percutaneous screw fixation was performed in 65% and partial radial head resection in 10%. Arthroscopy revealed elbow instability in 35%, leading to lateral collateral ligament reconstruction. After a mean follow up of 41.4 ± 3.4 months functional outcome was excellent in all cases (DASH-Score 0.6 ± 0.8; MEPI-Score 98.5 ± 2.4; OES-Score 47.3 ± 1.1).ConclusionsElbow arthroscopy has a significant diagnostic value in radial head fractures when compared to standard radiological imaging. Although statistically not significant, arthroscopy also revealed concomitant injuries in patients that presented with an uneventful MRI/CT. Furthermore, all intraarticular findings could be treated arthroscopically allowing for excellent functional outcomes.Trial registrationInstitutional Review Board University of Munich (LMU), Trial Number 507–14.