Treatment Of Peritoneal Dialysis-associated Peritonitis Research Articles

Clinical characteristics and antibiotic treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Pseudomonas species: a review of 15 years' experience from southern China.

Although the incidence of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Pseudomonas is very low, it seriously affects the technique survival of peritoneal dialysis patients. However, there are few studies and reports on Pseudomonas peritonitis in the Chinese mainland area. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics, the regimens of antibiotic, drug resistance, and outcome of peritoneal dialysis patients in southern China in the past 15 years and summarize the clinical experience in the treatment of Pseudomonas peritonitis.

Comparative simulation of intraperitoneal aminoglycoside regimens for patients with peritonitis on automated peritoneal dialysis.

Intraperitoneal (IP) aminoglycosides (AGs) continue to be the cornerstone of empiric management of peritonitis. AG dosing during automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), however, has not been well studied in patients with peritonitis. We sought to identify differences in AG exposure in the peritoneum and plasma for two different dosing regimens with little supporting evidence in patients on APD with peritonitis. A retrospective design that utilised the peritoneal and plasma concentration-time data from a prior study of 18 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with peritonitis to generate an in silico peritoneal and plasma PK model. This model was then used to compare via simulation using Phoenix© WinNonlin Software with IP AG dosing for a loading-dose regimen (1.5 mg/kg first dose) versus a fixed-dose regimen (0.6 mg/kg/d) in patients on APD with peritonitis. Outcome measures were (1) percentage of time where peritoneal peak concentrations/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio >10, (2) AUC/MIC > 74 and (3) plasma Cmin concentrations. Both regimens resulted in > 90% optimal peak/MIC ratio and AUC/MIC ratios on days 1 and 5 of the dose protocol. The loading-dose regimen resulted in IP exposures that were 2.5 times greater in the peritoneal compartment on day 1. By day 5, both protocols resulted in similar accumulation of AG plasma Cmin concentrations of 2.5-3.4 mg/L versus 2.4-3.3 mg/L, respectively, for the loading-dose regimen versus fixed-dose regimen. The current international guidelines for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis can continue to recommend the fixed-dose regimen for those on APD with the addition of plasma Cmin monitoring after 3 days to assess for drug accumulation.

#3849 PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER LOCK: PREVENTING RELAPSES

Abstract Background and Aims The incidence of peritonitis has markedly decreased in the last decades, nevertheless it remains one of the main causes of catheter removal and subsequent dialysis modality change. In the long-term severe peritonitis and relapses can lead to peritoneal membrane failure. Some bacteria can form biofilms in the peritoneal catheter lumen granting them resistance against antibiotics and thus being one of the causes for infection recurrences. To find a viable way to avoid or/and eradicate the bacterial biofilm in the peritoneal catheters given the importance of infections. Method We present the experience in our peritoneal dialysis unit in the coadjuvant treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis with peritoneal catheter locks in the past few years. We used two kinds of peritoneal catheter lock depending on the isolated germ and divided them in two groups. Group I for the gram-positive staphylococcus group and Group II for gram-negative germs, specifically pseudomona. We reported 12 cases from which 10 were the first episode of gram-positive staphylococcus (epidermidis and Aureus) peritonitis. For the treatment we locked the catheter with 350mg of daptomycin in 7ml of saline solution once a week without using the catheter for 12 hours. For the other 2 cases of pseudomona peritonitis we locked the catheter with taurolidine/urokinase during the exchange with icodextrin twice a week with a 12 hours dwell time until 9 locks were archived. Results We treated 12 patients (Table 1). Peritonitis was resolved without recurrences in 9 of 10 patients in group I. In one case were a Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was involved there was no response to the treatment and the peritoneal catheter was removed. In Group II both patients resolved their peritoneal infection without recurrences. Conclusion In our study peritoneal catheter locking seems to avoid the biofilm and reduce the peritoneal infection recurrences.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis.

Meropenem is a second-line agent for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PD peritonitis), while information on pharmacokinetics (PK) of intraperitoneal (i.p.) meropenem is limited in this patient group. The objective of the present evaluation was to assess a pharmacokinetic rationale for the selection of meropenem doses in automated PD (APD) patients based on population PK modelling. Data were available from a PK study in six patients undergoing APD who received a single 500 mg dose of meropenem intravenous or i.p. A population PK model was developed for plasma and dialysate concentrations (n = 360) using Monolix. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to assess the probability of achieving meropenem concentrations above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2 and 8 mg/L, representing susceptible and less susceptible pathogens respectively, for at least 40% of the dosing interval (T >MIC ≥ 40%). A two-compartment model for each plasma and dialysate concentrations with one transit compartment for the transfer from plasma to dialysate fluid described the data well. An i.p. dose of 250 and 750 mg, for an MIC of 2 and 8 mg/L respectively, was sufficient to attain the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target (T >MIC ≥ 40%) in more than 90% patients in plasma and dialysate. Additionally, the model predicted that no relevant meropenem accumulation in plasma and/or peritoneal fluid would occur with prolonged treatment. Our results suggest that an i.p. dose of 750 mg daily is optimal for pathogens with an MIC 2-8 mg/L in APD patients.

Variation in the Approach to Antibiotic Administration for the Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: Results From a Survey of US Medical Directors Participating in the OPPUS Study

Variation in the Approach to Antibiotic Administration for the Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: Results From a Survey of US Medical Directors Participating in the OPPUS Study

Pyridine levels in ceftazidime - peritoneal dialysis admixtures stored at body temperature.

For the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP), ceftazidime is routinely admixed with peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions before its intraperitoneal administration. One of the major degradation products of ceftazidime is pyridine, a potentially toxic compound. Depending on the type of PD solution, ceftazidime is exposed to an environment with acidic or basic pH, and depending on the type of dosing and individual unit practices related to preparation and storage, ceftazidime can be at body temperature for 4-10 h, resulting in potentially varying rates of degradation to pyridine by-product. No study has investigated whether the amount of generated pyridine exceeds the maximum daily exposure limit of 2 mg when ceftazidime-PD admixtures are kept at body temperature. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the levels of pyridine generated in PD-ceftazidime admixtures kept at 37°C for various time points. Ceftazidime was admixed with 2 L Dianeal (1.5%, 2.5% and 4.25% dextrose) and 2 L Physioneal (1.36%, 2.27% and 3.86% glucose) PD solutions to obtain a concentration of 125 mg/L (continuous dosing model) or 500 mg/L (intermittent dosing model). A total of 36 PD admixtures (3 bags for each type of PD solution and 3 bags for each type of dosing) were prepared and stored at 37°C for 10 h. An aliquot was withdrawn at time 0 (baseline) and after 2, 6, 8 and 10 h of storage. The withdrawn samples were then analysed to determine the concentrations of ceftazidime and pyridine using high-performance liquid chromatography. With the intermittent dosing model (500 mg/L), ceftazidime was found to be stable for only 2 and 6 h when admixed with 3.86% and 2.27% glucose Physioneal PD solutions, respectively. While ceftazidime (500 mg/L) retained more than 90% of its initial concentration in the three types of Dianeal and 1.36% dextrose Physioneal solutions for 10 and 8 h, respectively, the generated amount of pyridine ranged between approximately 290% and 371% more than the daily recommended limit. With the continuous dosing model (125 mg/L), ceftazidime was found to be stable for 6 h in all three types of Physioneal PD solutions, but the total amount of generated pyridine with four daily exchanges (6 h each) was estimated to be 170-360% over the daily recommended limit. Ceftazidime (125 mg/L) was chemically stable when admixed with three types of Dianeal PD solutions and stored at 37°C for 10 h, and the levels of pyridine were estimated to be less than the maximum recommended daily limit. Until the outcomes of this in vitro study are confirmed by appropriate in vivo studies, continuous dosing of ceftzadime-Dianeal admixtures for the treatment of PDAP may be preferred over continuous dosing of ceftazidime-Physioneal admixtures, and intermittent dosing of ceftazidime-Physioneal and ceftazidime-Dianeal admixtures, as ceftazidime remains stable and the generated levels of pyridine are below the maximum recommended daily exposure.

Stability of Meropenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam with Heparin in Various Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions.

Infections caused by ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing gram-negative bacteria are increasing worldwide. Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TZB) are recommended for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) caused by ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas and other resistant gram-negative bacteria. Patients may also receive intraperitoneal heparin to prevent occlusion of their catheters. However, the stability of meropenem or PIP/TZB, in combination with heparin, in different types of peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions used in clinical practice is currently unknown. Therefore, we investigated the stability of meropenem and PIP/TZB, each in combination with heparin, in different PD solutions. A total of 15 PD bags (3 bags for each type of PD solution) containing meropenem and heparin and 24 PD bags (3 bags for each type of PD solution) containing PIP/TZB and heparin were prepared and stored at 4°C for 168 hours. The same bags were stored at 25°C for 3 hours followed by 10 hours at 37°C. An aliquot withdrawn before storage and at defined time points was analyzed for the concentration of meropenem, PIP, TZB, and heparin using high-performance liquid chromatography. Samples were also analysed for particle content, pH and color change, and the anticoagulant activity of heparin. Meropenem and heparin retained more than 90% of their initial concentration in 4 out of 5 types of PD solutions when stored at 4°C for 168 hours, followed by storage at 25°C for 3 hours and then at 37°C for 10 hours. Piperacillin/tazobactam and heparin were found to be stable in all 8 types of PD solutions when stored under the same conditions. Heparin retained more than 98% of its initial anticoagulant activity throughout the study period. No evidence of particle formation, color change, or pH change was observed at any time under the storage conditions employed in the study. This study provides clinically important information on the stability of meropenem and PIP/TZB, each in combination with heparin, in different PD solutions. The use of meropenem-heparin admixed in pH-neutral PD solutions for the treatment of PDAP should be avoided, given the observed suboptimal stability of meropenem.

Stability of Ceftazidime and Heparin in Four Different Types of Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions.

Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of ceftazidime is recommended for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) from Pseudomonas. Patients with PDAP may also need IP heparin to overcome problems with drainage of turbid peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluids and blockage of catheters with fibrin. Physico-chemical stability of ceftazidime and heparin, and biological stability of heparin in many types of PD solutions is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the stability of ceftazidime and heparin in 4 types of PD solutions. A total of 12 PD bags (3 for each type of solution) containing ceftazidime and heparin were prepared and stored at 4°C for 120 hours, and then at 25°C for 6 hours, and finally at 37°C for 12 hours. An aliquot was withdrawn after predefined time points and analyzed for the concentration of ceftazidime and heparin using high-performance liquid-chromatography (HPLC). Samples were assessed for pH, color changes, particle content, and anticoagulant activity of heparin. Ceftazidime and heparin retained more than 91% of their initial concentration when stored at 4°C for 120 hours followed by storage at 25°C for 6 hours and then at 37°C for 12 hours. Heparin retained more than 95% of its initial activity throughout the study period. Particle formation was not detected at any time under the storage conditions. The pH and color remained essentially unchanged throughout the study. Ceftazidime-heparin admixture retains its stability over long periods of storage at different temperatures, allowing its potential use for PDAP treatment in outpatient and remote settings.

Residual Kidney Function and Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis Treatment Outcomes.

Residual kidney function contributes to the clearance of antibiotics excreted by the kidneys, lowering the antibiotic concentration, which may adversely affect the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. The objective of our study was to examine the relationship between residual kidneyfunction and peritonitis treatment outcomes. Our study included 181 participants who experienced 339 episodes of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and culture-negative peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis at a single centerfrom 2003 to 2010. Episodes were categorized according to participants' urinary creatinine clearance (0, >0-5, and >5 ml/min). The data were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models to determine the covariate-adjusted association between urinary creatinine clearance and treatment failure (defined as relapse or recurrent peritonitis episodes, peritoneal catheter removal, or death from any cause during peritonitis treatment). Among episodes of peritonitis due to Gram-positive organisms or culture-negative infections, those experienced by participants with urinary creatinine clearance >5 ml/min had significantly higher odds of treatment failure than episodes experienced by anuric participants (27 of 80 versus 20 of 119 episodes resulting in treatment failure for creatinine clearance >5 versus 0 ml/min; odds ratio, 6.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.37 to 19.6). Episodes experienced by participants with creatinine clearance >0-5 ml/min also had significantly higher odds of treatment failure than episodes experienced by anuric participants (14 of 64 episodes resulting in treatment failure for creatinine clearance >0-5 ml/min; odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 7.35). The odds of relapse and recurrent peritonitis among participants with creatinine clearance >5 ml/min was also significantly higher compared with in anuric participants (17 of 80 versus 12 of 119 episodes resulting in relapse and recurrence for creatinine clearance >5 versus 0 ml/min; odds ratio, 6.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.90 to 23.8). Among participants with Gram-negative peritonitis, creatinine clearance was significantly associated with neither treatment failure nor relapse and recurrent peritonitis. Residual kidney function as measured by greater urinary creatinine clearance was associated with treatment failure among participants with Gram-positive and culture-negative peritonitis.

Intraperitoneal Vancomycin Concentrations during Peritoneal Dialysis–Associated Peritonitis: Correlation with Serum Levels

For the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDP), it has been suggested that serum concentrations of vancomycin be kept above 12 mg/L-15 mg/L. However, studies correlating vancomycin concentrations in serum and peritoneal dialysate effluent (PDE) during active infection are sparse. We undertook the present study to investigate this issue and to determine whether achieving the recommended serum level of vancomycin results in therapeutic levels intraperitoneally. We studied patients treated with intraperitoneal (i.p.) vancomycin for non-gram-negative PDP. We gave a single dose (approximately 30 mg/kg) at presentation, and we subsequently measured vancomycin levels in PDE on day 5; we wanted to determine if efflux of vancomycin from serum to PDE during a 4-hour dwell was consistent and resulted in therapeutic levels. Of the 48 episodes of PDP studied, serum vancomycin concentrations exceeding 12 mg/L were achieved in 98% of patients, but in 11 patients (23%), a PDE vancomycin level below 4 mg/L--the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of many gram-positive organisms--was observed at the end of a 4-hour dwell on day 5. The correlation between the concentrations of vancomycin in serum and PDE (from efflux of antibiotic over 4 hours) was statistically significant, but poor (R(2) = 0.18). Our data support the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis statement that adequate serum vancomycin concentrations can be achieved with intermittent dosing (single dose every 5 days), but cannot guarantee therapeutic PDE levels in the treatment of PDP. Intermittent dosing of vancomycin may not consistently result in PDE concentrations markedly greater than MIC of many important pathogens. Although the clinical significance of this finding remains to be determined, it may be preferable to give smaller but more frequent doses of PDE vancomycin (continuous dosing) for adults with PDP (as is currently recommended for children).

Stability of Cefazolin Sodium in Four Heparinized and Non-Heparinized Dialysate Solutions at 38°C

Intraperitoneal administration of antibiotics is often required in the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. Extended use and heating may affect drug stability. The objective of our study was to determine the stability of cefazolin sodium (125 mg/L and 500 mg/L) in heparinized and non-heparinized dextrosecontaining peritoneal dialysis solution (Dianeal PD-2; Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois, USA) containing 1.5%, 2.5%, or 4.25% dextrose, or 7.5% icodextrin, the new colloid formulation (Extraneal; Baxter), at 38 degrees C for 4 days. Three poly-vinyl chloride containers of each dialysis fluid were stored at 38 degrees C for 4 days. Samples were taken after the bags were mixed and allowed to stand for 2 minutes. Two 500-microL samples were collected from each bag at hours 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96. Samples were then analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in our laboratory. In order to establish the stability-indicating nature of the method, drugs 1.0 mg/mL, vehicles, and their mixtures were subjected to a forced degradation. This is done by acid (2.0 mol/L HCl) and base (2.0 mol/L NaOH) hydrolysis, oxidation (H(2)O(2) 0.3%), and heat at 80 degrees C. Samples were analyzed every 30 minutes until approximately 25% of the drug's peak disappeared. The drug was considered stable if its concentration exceeded 90% of the original. For all Dianeal PD-2 peritoneal dialysis solution containing 1.5%, 2.5%, and 4.25% dextrose, cefazolin sodium was considered stable at 38 degrees C for 60 hours at low cefazolin concentrations (125 mg/L), both with and without heparin, and for 48 hours at high cefazolin concentrations (500 mg/L). Cefazolin sodium was considered stable at 38 degrees C in icodextrin for 48 hours at low cefazolin concentrations in heparinized and non-heparinized solutions, and at high concentrations only in non-heparinized dialysate, not in heparinized dialysate. Cefazolin sodium was considered stable at 38 degrees C in icodextrin for 60 hours at high concentrations when heparinized. Cefazolin sodium was stable in all four nonheparinized dialysate fluids for at least 48 hours at 38 degrees C. In heparinized icodextrin dialysate, high concentrations of cefazolin sodium were not stable for extended periods of time. Extended use and heating of dialysate containing cefazolin may adversely affect patient outcome.

Prevention and Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis in Pediatric Patients

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the preferred dialysis modality in children and adolescents aged less than 15 years. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis remains a major cause of morbidity and reason for dropout from the PD program, although the incidence of peritonitis seems to have decreased during the past few years. Improved patient care, more frequent use of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), use of PD catheters with downward facing exit sites, and Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis account for this decline in infectious complications. With respect to the isolated micro-organism in PD-associated peritonitis, a predominance of gram-positive germs is found in children. Recent registry data suggest a decrease in coagulase-negative staphylococci, with a relative increase in gram-negative peritonitis episodes. The empiric antibiotic treatment regimen using a first-generation cephalosporin or a glycopeptide in combination with a third-generation cephalosporin in a risk-stratified manner was suggested in the pediatric peritonitis treatment guidelines. This regimen is currently being evaluated in the International Pediatric Peritonitis Registry.

Effective Treatment of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis with Cefazolin and Ceftazidime in Children

To evaluate the use of the combination of cefazolin and ceftazidime for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis in pediatric patients. Retrospective nonrandomized study. Pediatric dialysis units of the University Medical Center of Utrecht and Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 40 children (median age 5.4 years) who were treated with PD during the study period of 4.5 years. All 50 episodes of peritonitis that occurred during the study period were evaluated by review of medical records. Patients were given intraperitoneal ceftazidime 500 mg/L dialysis fluid, and cefazolin 500 mg/L as a loading dose, followed by a maintenance dose of ceftazidime 125 mg/L and cefazolin 100 mg/L, intraperitoneally, 4 times daily. Antibiotics were continued for 14 days. After identification of the causative microorganism, one of the antibiotics was discontinued in 34 cases, and the antibiotic schedule was adapted in 2 cases. All cases were initially cured within 3 days. In 5 cases (10%), there was a peritonitis with the same organism recurring within 2 weeks after completion of treatment. There were 4 cases of PD-related peritonitis caused by pseudomonas, all of which were cured. The antibiotic combination of cefazolin and ceftazidime is effective for the initial therapy of PD-related peritonitis in children. The toxic complications of aminoglycosides are avoided with this combination.