Treatment Of Mycoplasma Genitalium Infection Research Articles

Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection in pregnancy: Asystematic review of international guidelines.

Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging pathogen, which has been linked to cervicitis, urethritis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). With the advent of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels for sexually transmitted infections, it is increasingly being identified in pregnant women. The aim was to review international guidelines, which had explicit recommendations for treatment of M. genitalium infection in pregnancy and breastfeeding. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were reviewed with no age, species, language or date restrictions. Studies were included if they had an explicit recommendation for treatment of M. genitalium in pregnancy. Studies were excluded if there was no recommendation in pregnancy, if they referred to other international guideline recommendations or were historical versions of guidelines. References were manually reviewed and 50 papers were selected for review. Only four guidelines were included in the final analysis and they were from Europe, UK, Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. All studies recommended azithromycin as first-line treatment, and advised against moxifloxacin use. The dosing schedule of azithromycin, varied between guidelines, as did the utility/safety of pristinamycin for macrolide resistant infections. Safety data was generally reassuring for azithromycin but inconsistent for pristinamycin. Azithromycin is the first-line treatment for macrolide susceptible or unknown resistance infections, but there is a lack of consistency regarding dosing of azithromycin or the utility/safety of pristinamycin for macrolide resistant infections in pregnancy/lactation.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin Versus Moxifloxacin for the Initial Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium Infection.

Mycoplasma genitalium is recognized as a remarkable pathogen since azithromycin-resistant strains and treatment failure have been increasingly reported. Nevertheless, international guidelines still recommend azithromycin as a first-line treatment and moxifloxacin as a second-line treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the efficacy and safety of both drugs in the initial treatment of M. genitalium. We systematically searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Ichushi, and CINAHL databases up to December 2021. We defined efficacy as clinical and microbiologic cure, and safety as persistent diarrhea. Overall, four studies met the inclusion criteria: one showed clinical cure (azithromycin treatment, n = 32; moxifloxacin treatment, n = 6), four showed microbiologic cure (n = 516; n = 99), and one showed safety (n = 63; n = 84). Moxifloxacin improved the microbiologic cure rate compared with azithromycin (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–7.35). Clinical cure and safety did not show a significant difference between azithromycin and moxifloxacin treatments (OR 4.51, 95% CI 0.23–88.3; OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.21–1.83). Our meta-analysis showed that moxifloxacin was more effective than azithromycin at eradicating M. genitalium infections and supports its preferential use as a first-line treatment.

Performance of Three Commercial Molecular Diagnostic Assays for the Simultaneous Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Macrolide Resistance.

The increasing frequency of macrolide resistance is an emerging issue in the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection. Because evaluation of new commercial kits detecting M. genitalium and macrolide resistance is needed, we evaluated the performance and handling characteristics of the Allplex MG & AziR (Seegene), the Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB (ELITechGroup), and the ResistancePlus MG FleXible (SpeeDx-Cepheid) kits in comparison with those of an in-house real-time PCR and 23S rRNA gene sequencing used as the reference. A total of 239 urogenital specimens (135 M. genitalium-positive and 104 M. genitalium-negative specimens) collected between April and December 2019 at the French National Reference Center for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections were assessed. The overall agreement for M. genitalium detection of the three commercial kits compared with the in-house real-time PCR was 94.6 to 97.6%, and there was no significant difference. A total of 97 specimens were found to be M. genitalium positive with the three kits and were used to assess macrolide resistance detection. The clinical sensitivities for resistance detection were 74.5% (95% confidence interval, 61.7 to 84.2%), 96.2% (87.2 to 99.0%), and 92.8% (82.7 to 97.1%) for the Allplex MG & AziR, Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB, and ResistancePlus MG FleXible kits, respectively. The sensitivity of the Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB kit was significantly higher than that of the Allplex MG & AziR kit. The clinical specificity for resistance detection of the three kits was 97.4 to 97.6%. The random-access possibility, input sample volume, and DNA extract availability for detecting resistance to other antibiotics may also influence the selection of a commercial kit by diagnostic laboratories.

Resistance-Guided Antimicrobial Therapy Using Doxycycline-Moxifloxacin and Doxycycline-2.5 g Azithromycin for the Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium Infection: Efficacy and Tolerability.

Macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) exceeds 50% in many regions, and quinolone resistance is increasing. We recently reported that resistance-guided therapy (RGT) using doxycycline followed by sitafloxacin or 2.5 g azithromycin cured 92% and 95% of macrolide-resistant and macrolide-susceptible infections, respectively. We present data on RGT using doxycycline-moxifloxacin, the regimen recommended in international guidelines, and extend data on the efficacy of doxycycline-2.5 g azithromycin and de novo macrolide resistance. Patients attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2017 and 2018 with sexually transmitted infection syndromes were treated with doxycycline for 7 days and recalled if MG-positive. Macrolide-susceptible cases received 2.5 g azithromycin (1 g, then 500 mg daily for 3 days), and resistant cases moxifloxacin (400 mg daily, 7 days). Test of cure was recommended 14-28 days post-antimicrobials. There were 383 patients (81 females/106 heterosexual males/196 men who have sex with men) included. Microbial cure following doxycycline-azithromycin was 95.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.7-98.0) and doxycycline-moxifloxacin was 92.0% (95% CI, 88.1-94.6). De novo macrolide resistance was detected in 4.6% of cases. Combining doxycycline-azithromycin data with our prior RGT study (n = 186) yielded a pooled cure of 95.7% (95% CI, 91.6-97.8). ParC mutations were present in 22% of macrolide-resistant cases. These findings support the inclusion of moxifloxacin in resistance-guided strategies and extend the evidence for 2.5 g azithromycin and presumptive use of doxycycline. These data provide an evidence base for current UK, Australian, and European guidelines for the treatment of MG.

Antibiotic treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection

Antibiotic treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection

Pathogenicity of Mycoplasma genitalium and treatment of its infection

Mycoplasma genitalium is an important sexually transmitted pathogen which infects the reproductive tract and rectum of males and females. It can cause local inflammation by adhering to epithelial cells and activating the host immune response. In recent years, with the wide spread of macrolide-resistant strains, the efficacy of early use of azithromycin for the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection has been obviously decreased. Quinolones such as moxifloxacin can increase the cure rate of Mycoplasma genitalium infection. However, with the emergence of quinolones-resistant strains, treatment failure cases have been reported. More seriously, there have been reports on multidrug-resistant strains which are resistant to both macrolides and quinolones. Doxycycline and pristinamycin can also be used for the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection, but there are some disadvantages of low bacterial clearance rate and multiple daily administration. Therefore, new drugs and better treatment approaches for Mycoplasma genitalium infection are needed. Key words: Mycoplasma genitalium; Microbiological phenomena; Therapeutic uses; Anti-bacterial agents; Drug resistance

High levels of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in Queensland, Australia.

The macrolide azithromycin is recommended for treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection; however, M. genitalium strains possessing macrolide resistance-mediating mutations (MRMMs) are increasingly being reported. Here, we used the SpeeDx ResistancePlus MG kit, which provides simultaneous detection of M. genitalium and MRMMs, to assess MRMM carriage among M. genitalium infections in Queensland, Australia. Performance characteristics of the ResistancePlus MG kit for M. genitalium detection were compared to in-house PCR. Available M. genitalium PCR-positive (n=67) and negative (n=281) samples from the years 2011 to 2017 were tested using the SpeeDx ResistancePlus MG kit. In total, 63.6 % M. genitalium-positive samples were indicated to harbour MRMMs. The ResistancePlus MG method provided sensitivity and specificity of 97 and 99.6 % respectively compared to in-house PCR for M. genitalium detection. Such high levels of macrolide-resistant M. genitalium raise further concerns over future use of azithromycin for treatment of M. genitalium infection.

Bacterial Load in Daily Urine Samples of Patients Infected with Mycoplasma genitalium, Mutation Analysis, and Response to Treatment.

Objective. Increasing macrolide resistant strains of Mycoplasma genitalium is a challenge, and to differentiate between treatment failure and reinfection a timely test of cure (TOC) is warranted. The aim of this study was to evaluate the best time for TOC after five days' treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection with azithromycin. Methods. Nineteen patients with positive PCR for Mycoplasma genitalium in urine provided urine samples daily for 2 weeks and on days 21, 28, and 35. Samples were tested by a commercial qPCR and by sequencing of the 23S rRNA gene. Results. Eight patients with a wild type of Mycoplasma genitalium responded successfully within four days after treatment initiation. Eleven patients had a mutation in the 23S rRNA gene. These samples exhibited high variations in bacterial load, and some patients tested negative at several time points during the observation period. Conclusions. Day-to-day fluctuations in the mutation samples allow for false negative TOC during the first 5 weeks after start of treatment. Due to increasing macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium, pretreatment mutation analysis is recommended. When a wild type is verified, TOC performed one week after initiation of treatment is suggested.

The prevalence of urethral and rectal Mycoplasma genitalium and its associations in men who have sex with men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic

ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of rectal and urethral Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) in men who have sex with men (MSM) attending a genitourinary medicine clinic and to measure its associations with...