Treatment Of Mitral Regurgitation Research Articles

Impact of heart failure severity on the mortality benefit of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair.

To assess the interaction between heart failure (HF) severity and optimal reduction of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). Among 1656 patients included in the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GIse) registry Of Transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitaTiOn (GIOTTO) 984 had SMR and complete data on advanced HF. Advanced HF was defined as NYHA class III or IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%, and > 1 HF hospitalization during the last 12months. Optimal M-TEER was defined as residual SMR ≤ 1 + at discharge. One hundred sixteen patients (11.8%) had advanced HF. Achievement of an optimal SMR reduction was similar in patients with and without advanced HF (65% and 60% respectively). Advanced HF was an independent predictor of 2-year all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.10). Optimal M-TEER, as compared to a no-optimal M-TEER, was associated with a reduced risk of death both in patients with advanced (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p = 0.039) and no-advanced HF (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46-0.78; p < 0.001; p = 0.778 for interaction). Advanced HF is associated with poor outcome in patients undergoing M-TEER. However, an optimal SMR reduction reduces the risk of 2-year mortality regardless of HFseverity.

Application of a Novel Mitral Valvuloplasty Strategy in Children with Mitral Regurgitation.

To retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy of an innovative mitral valvuloplasty strategy in the treatment of mitral regurgitation in children. From January 2018 to December 2022, 140 patients undergoing surgical treatment for mitral regurgitation in our hospital were enrolled. Ninety patients underwent three-step standardized pediatric mitral valvuloplasty (group A) and 50 patients underwent simple annuloplasty (group B). The incidence of primary and secondary study endpoint was compared between the two groups, and the independent risk factors for the primary study endpoint were determined. Our primary study endpoint was a composite endpoint of postoperative functional mitral failure, postoperative heart failure, transplantation, and/or mortality. Secondary end points were defined as perioperative complications. During the follow-up period, there was no all-cause death. Primary endpoint events occurred in 22 patients, including 12 patients in group A and 10 patients in group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of primary and secondary endpoint events between the two groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that younger age and residual mitral regurgitation at discharge were independent risk factors for the primary endpoint events, while type of MV repair was not an independent risk factor. Subgroup analysis based on age showed that primary endpoint events occurred in 4 patients in group A and 7 patients in group B in patients < 1year old. The incidence of primary endpoint events in group A was lower than that in group B (6.06% vs. 20.59%, P = 0.041). In patients ≥ 1year old, the primary endpoint event occurred in 8 cases in group A and 3 cases in group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of primary endpoint events between groups A and B (33.33% vs. 18.75%, P = 0.312). The degree of mitral regurgitation at discharge was significantly improved compared with that before operation in both groups (P < 0.001), and the degree of mitral regurgitation at the last follow-up was not significantly worse than that at discharge (P = 0.090). The mid-term results of mitral valvuloplasty for mitral regurgitation in children are encouraging. The perioperative recovery and postoperative outcomes of three-step standardized mitral valvuloplasty in children are not inferior to those of annuloplasty alone. Three-step standardized pediatric mitral valvuloplasty has better postoperative outcomes than simple mitral annuloplasty, especially for patients younger than 1year old. Children with residual mitral regurgitation at discharge should be followed up regularly to be alert to the occurrence of poor prognosis.

Emerging Transcatheter Therapies for Valvular Heart Disease: Focus on Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Procedures

The emergence of percutaneous treatment options provides novel therapeutic alternatives for older and feeble patients who are at high risk for any surgical procedure. The purpose of our review was to offer an up-to-date analysis of the rapidly expanding field of percutaneous technologies for mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary procedures. Edge-to-edge repair is an established treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), while transcatheter mitral valve replacement is a potential and expanding option for managing both secondary and primary MR. However, additional advancements are necessary to enhance the safety and feasibility of this procedure. Transcatheter tricuspid intervention is an emerging option that was conceived after the success of transcatheter procedures in aortic and mitral valves, and it is currently still in the early stages of advancement. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the previously overlooked effect of tricuspid regurgitation on patient outcomes. The development of edge-to-edge repair represents the forefront of innovations in transcatheter procedures. There is a scarcity of data about tricuspid annuloplasty and replacement, and further study is necessary. Transcatheter mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary procedures show prospects for the future, while their role in clinical practice has not been definitively established.

Efficacy and safety of trans-catheter repair devices for mitral regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSeveral repair strategies emerged as possible treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the different percutaneous mitral valve repair approaches. MethodsPubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies until December 11th, 2023. Clinical efficacy endpoints were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and post-procedural NYHA functional class <3; the echocardiographic efficacy endpoint was a post-intervention residual MR less than moderate. Safety endpoints and procedural outcome measures were also assessed. ResultsEleven studies were included: 8 [N = 1662 patients, mean follow-up (FUP) 294 days] compared MitraClip® vs Pascal® device, 2 (N = 195 patients) MitraClip® vs Carillon® and 1 study (N = 186 patients) evaluated MitraClip® against Cardioband®. The Pascal®-treated group had lower MR degree compared to the MitraClip®-treated group, without difference in post-intervention mean trans-mitral gradient and in clinical and safety endpoints. A longer procedure time was observed in the Pascal® group, albeit with a lower average number of implanted devices per procedure. The two studies comparing MitraClip® and Carillon® were inconsistent in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes, while the study evaluating MitraClip® vs Cardioband® showed that the latter might confer a significant clinical benefit, with a similar reduction in MR. ConclusionsPascal® is as safe and clinically effective as MitraClip® in treating patients with MR, with an apparent greater reduction in the magnitude of residual valve insufficiency over the long term. Data on Cardioband® and Carillon® are not robust enough to draw conclusions from the use of such devices.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Transcatheter Intervention, Surgery, and Pharmacological Treatment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation — A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis with ≥12-Month Follow-up

Aim: Evaluate, using a Bayesian network meta-analysis system, the long-term prognosis of patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing individual or combined treatment with percutaneous intervention, surgical intervention, or optimal medical therapy. Compare the prognostic outcomes of the different treatment modalities. Methods: Computerized searches of Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were searched to compare prognoses following transcatheter interventions, surgery, and optimal pharmacological treatment for FMR, all with a construction timeframe of 21 October 2023. The primary endpoint event was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint events were heart failure readmission rate, mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+ improvement rate, New York Heart Association (NYHA) improvement rate (improvement to I–II), and degree of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement. Results: Twenty-six (26) papers were included, comprising 10 RCTs and 16 observational studies involving 5443 patients. A network meta-analysis showed no significant difference in prognosis for all-cause mortality among transcatheter interventions, surgical procedures, and optimal pharmacological treatments. For heart failure readmission rates, mitral valve surgery was superior to MitraClip (odds ratio (OR) = 11.82; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67, 90.13). For NYHA (improvement to I–II) improvement rates, the results showed no significant differences for the various mitral interventions. For MR ≤2+ improvement rates, the MitraClip (OR = 3.07; 95% CI: 2.42, 3.76), MitraClip+Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (OR = 2.93; 95% CI: 2.38, 3.52), mitral valve surgery (OR = 3.01; 95% CI: 2.24, 3.8), and annuloplasty (OR = 4.31; 95% CI: 3.12, 5.58) were superior to GDMT, and mitral valve surgery (OR = 0.07; 95% CI: –0.45, 0.62) was superior to MitraClip+GDMT. For the degree of improvement in LVEF, Carillon+GDMT (mean difference (MD) = –0.97; 95% CI: –1.72, –0.22) was superior to GDMT, mitral valve surgery was superior to Carillon+GDMT (MD = 4.67; 95% CI: 0.92, 8.39); MitraClip+GDMT (MD = 4.01; 95% CI: 1.28, 6.66), GDMT (MD = 3.71; 95% CI: 0.04, 7.35), and annuloplasty were superior to mitral valve surgery (MD = –6.42; 95% CI: –11.96, –0.78). Conclusion: There were no significant differences among the three treatment modalities of transcatheter intervention, surgery, and optimal drug therapy in improving all-cause mortality hard endpoint events, and no significant differences were seen in the rates of heart failure readmission and NYHA improvement (improvement to I–II). However, surgery was superior to transcatheter intervention and optimal drug therapy in terms of improvement in the degree of regurgitation and LVEF.

PERCUTANEOUS EDGE–TO–EDGE REPAIR OF MITRAL REGURGITATION IN CARDIAC AMYLOIDOSIS: DO IT BUT NOT TOO MUCH

Abstract We report the case of a 68 year old man with history of wild type TTR cardiac amyloidosis, treated with tafamidis since 1 year, symptomatic for advanced cardiac failure, already in optimal medical treatment, CRT–D, oral anticoagulation for permanent atrial fibrillation. The patient was hospitalised in our intensive care unit for refractory NYHA IV cardiac failure, anuria, very low ejection fraction combined with severe mitral regurgitation. He was treated with inotropes and diuretics then levosimendan however he remained in very critical state and we discussed the opportunity to reduce the mitral regurgitation by percutaneous edge to edge repair. In this setting of restrictive physiology literature is not unanimous and preload reduction secondary to mitral regurgitation treatment may sometimes be deleterious. We decided to offer our patient edge to edge repair by targeting a moderate reduction of mitral regurgitation and also considering some challenges linked to this pathology as atrial septal involvement with ovalis fossa relevant thickness. The procedure was successful with a reduction of mitral regurgitation grade from severe to mild–to moderate and this allowed the patient to re equilibrate his hemodynamic balance and he was able to be dismissed with a short term follow up program.

Understanding transcatheter edge-to-edge repair "knobology": Advanced catheter steering for different scenarios of transseptal puncture.

Following the introduction in the latest European and American guidelines, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair has become a valid alternative to surgery for ineligible patients. Among the available technologies, MitraClip (Abbott) was the first to be introduced for the percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation with the edge-to-edge technique. Although its safety and effectiveness has been widely demonstrated, the optimal procedural results are highly dependent from operators' experience. In this manuscript, we provide a full guide of advanced steering maneuvers of MitraClip in different scenarios of transseptal puncture.

Early and late Results after Surgical Mitral Valve Repair: A High-Volume Center Experience.

Surgical mitral valve repair is the gold standard treatment of severe primary mitral valve regurgitation (MR). In the light of rapidly evolving percutaneous technologies, current surgical outcome data is essential to support heart team-based decision making. This retrospective, high-volume, single-center study analyzed in 1779 patients with primary MR early morbidity and mortality, postoperative valve function, and long-term survival after mitral valve repair. Surgeries were performed between 2009 and 2022. Surgical approaches included full sternotomy (FS) and right-sided mini-thoracotomy (MIC). Of the surgeries (mean age: 59.9 (SD:11.4) years; 71.5% males), 85.6% (n=1527) were mini-thoracotomies. Concomitant procedures were performed in 849 patients (47.7%), including tricuspid valve and/or atrial septal defect repair, cryoablation and atrial appendage closure. The majority of patients did not need erythrocyte concentrates. Mediastinitis and re-thoracotomy for bleeding rates were 0.1 and 4.3%, respectively. Reoperation before discharge for failed repair was necessary in 12 patients (0.7%). Freedom from more than moderate MR was >99%. Thirty-day mortality was 0.2% and did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.37). Median follow-up was 48.2 months with a completeness of 95.9%. Long term survival was similar between groups (P=0.21). In the FS and MIC groups, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year survival was 98.8 and 98.8%, 92.9 and 94.4%, and 87.4 and 83.1%, respectively. Mitral valve surgery, both minimally-invasive and via sternotomy, is associated with high repair rates, excellent perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival. Data underscore the effectiveness of surgical repair in managing MR, even in the era of advancing interventional techniques.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as a Non-Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND Multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) represents a severe type of coronary artery disease (CAD). Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common mechanical complication in patients with CAD. This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on moderate/severe IMR in patients with MVD. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical data were collected from 15 patients who underwent successful treatment for MVD combined with moderate/severe IMR through the PCI procedure and achieved complete revascularization between January 2014 and December 2022. Cardiac structural and functional parameters were assessed through echocardiographic evaluations. Color flow recordings of MR jets were obtained through an enlarged view of the 4-chamber cut, and the diagnosis of MR was categorized into mild (<4 cm²), moderate (4-8 cm²), and severe (>8 cm²), based on the MR area. RESULTS The common features of the selected cases were advanced age, low body weight, and renal insufficiency. Cardiac echocardiography revealed an augmentation in the left atrial anteroposterior diameter and left ventricular internal diameter at end-systole after PCI, while the left ventricle internal diameter in diastole, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular fractional shortening were comparable to preoperative values. All patients had moderate/severe MR preoperatively, and MR improved at 1 month (2.73±0.69) and 12 months (2.26±0.58) after PCI. CONCLUSIONS In cases of MVD accompanied by moderate/severe IMR, undergoing PCI can spare certain elderly patients with low body weight and renal insufficiency from high-risk surgery, alleviating the severity of MR without undergoing mitral valve intervention.

(1199) - Double Bridge Approach for Treatment of Acute Mitral Regurgitation from Ruptured Chordae

(1199) - Double Bridge Approach for Treatment of Acute Mitral Regurgitation from Ruptured Chordae

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair versus Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: An Observational Study.

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIC-MVS) has been established as preferred treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), but mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair (M-TEER) is routinely performed in patients at high surgical risk and is increasingly performed in intermediate risk patients. Methods: From 2010 to 2021, we performed 723 M-TEER and 123 isolated MIC-MVS procedures. We applied a sensitivity analysis by matching age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), EuroSCORE II and etiology of MR. Results: Baseline characteristics showed significant differences in the overall cohort (p < 0.01): age 78.3 years vs. 61.5 years, EuroSCORE II 5.5% vs. 1.3% and LVEF 48.4% vs. 60.4% in M-TEER vs. MIC-MVS patients. Grade of MR at discharge was moderate/severe in 24.5% (171/697) in M-TEER vs. 6.5% (8/123) in MIC-MVS (p < 0.01). One-year survival was 91.5% (552/723) in M-TEER vs. 97.6% (95/123) in MIC-MVS (p = 0.04). A matching with 49 pairs (n = 98) showed comparable survival during follow-up, but a numerically higher mean mitral valve gradient of 4.1 mmHg (95% CI: 3.6-4.6) vs. 3.4 mmHg (95% CI: 3.0-3.8) in M-TEER (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients undergoing M-TEER had lower one-year survival than MIC-MVS, but differences disappeared after matching. Reduction in MR was less effective in M-TEER patients and postprocedural mitral valve gradients were higher.

Outcomes of COMBO therapy for severe mitral regurgitation compared with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

There are different types of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) currently in clinical use, including leaflet approximation, annular cinching, and restoration of the chordal apparatus of the mitral valve (MV). While the concomitant combination (COMBO) therapy of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) with another TMVr concept has been proven feasible, potentially offering patient-tailored treatment for severe mitral regurgitation (MR), a comparison with M-TEER alone has not been made. To evaluate the procedural and clinical outcome of COMBO therapies compared with M-TEER alone. We included consecutive patients undergoing COMBO and M-TEER between March 2015 and April 2018 at our Heart Valve Center, while excluding patients presenting a case of redo or with previous MV surgery. Procedural outcomes and all-cause mortality were compared between COMBO therapy vs. M-TEER alone. A total of 357 patients (mean age 78.9 ± 7.0 years, 53.2% male, M-TEER n = 322, COMBO n = 35; COMBO: MitraClip and the Carillon mitral contour system n = 26, MitraClip and Cardioband n = 5, and MitraClip and NeoChord n = 4) were analyzed. Patients with COMBO therapy had larger left chamber sizes, a lower left ventricular systolic ejection fraction (LVEF; COMBO: 37.4 ± 13.8%, M-TEER: 47.9 ± 14.3%, p < 0.001), and a more severe MR grade (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of residual MR ≧2+. However, the need for re-intervention, always employing M-TEER, was more common in the COMBO group. During a mean 3.6-year long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference of all-cause mortality between both groups (Log rank p = 0.921). COMBO therapy may still be a beneficial therapy option for patients with severe MR who already have a more dilated left ventricle (LV), a more severe MR, and a more pronounced LV systolic dysfunction. The higher need for re-intervention in the COMBO group may signal more complex anatomies and possibly underlines the necessity of treating significant MR earlier. Future research is required to establish the COMBO approach as a toolbox-like treatment option, thus offering a patient-tailored approach depending on the individual anatomy and pathology.

Advancements in MitraClip Intervention for Mitral Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review and Comparative Analysis of Clinical Trials.

This comprehensive review explores the evolution and clinical impact of MitraClip intervention in the management of mitral regurgitation. Mitral regurgitation results from dysfunction in the mitral valve (MV) apparatus. The MitraClip Clip Delivery System was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013. The discussion delves into the procedural foundation of MitraClip intervention, primarily based on Alfieri's technique of edge-to-edge leaflet approximation. As highlighted by key clinical trials, includingEndovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair(EVEREST) II Trial, Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) Trial, and Percutaneous Repair with the MitraClip Device for Severe Functional/Secondary Mitral Regurgitation (MITRA-FR) trial, the efficacy and safety of MitraClip were evaluated in comparison to surgical interventions and guideline-directed medical therapy. Notably, the COAPT demonstrated significant benefits in reducing all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, while the MITRA-FR presented contrasting results, emphasizing the importance of patient selection. An analysis of the EVEREST II trial underscores MitraClip's potential to achieve comparable outcomes to surgical intervention, emphasizing its role in reducing mitral regurgitation and improving clinical status. However, limitations and complications, such as device-related issues and the potential impact on future MV surgery, are discussed. The study also explores the evolving landscape of MV interventions, reflecting advancements and the growing acceptance of MitraClip. In conclusion, the MitraClip device represents a significant advancement in the treatment of mitral regurgitation. The data presented highlights its promising results in terms of reduced hospitalization rates, improved in-hospital mortality, and enhanced quality of life for patients. However, challenges remain, and careful consideration of patient selection and underlying pathology is crucial in determining the optimal treatment approach. Ongoing research and clinical experience will continue to refine our understanding of MitraClip's role in the evolving landscape of MV interventions.

Path tracking control of a steerable catheter in transcatheter cardiology interventions

PurposeIntracardiac transcatheter interventions allow for reducing trauma and hospitalization stays as compared to standard surgery. In the treatment of mitral regurgitation, the most widely adopted transcatheter approach consists in deploying a clip on the mitral valve leaflets by means of a catheter that is run through veins from a peripheral access to the left atrium. However, precise manipulation of the catheter from outside the body while copying with the path constraints imposed by the vessels remains challenging.MethodsWe proposed a path tracking control framework that provides adequate motion commands to the robotic steerable catheter for autonomous navigation through vascular lumens. The proposed work implements a catheter kinematic model featuring nonholonomic constraints. Relying on the real-time measurements from an electromagnetic sensor and a fiber Bragg grating sensor, a two-level feedback controller was designed to control the catheter.ResultsThe proposed method was tested in a patient-specific vessel phantom. A median position error between the center line of the vessel and the catheter tip trajectory was found to be below 2 mm, with a maximum error below 3 mm. Statistical testing confirmed that the performance of the proposed method exhibited no significant difference in both free space and the contact region.ConclusionThe preliminary in vitro studies presented in this paper showed promising accuracy in navigating the catheter within the vessel. The proposed approach enables autonomous control of a steerable catheter for transcatheter cardiology interventions without the request of calibrating the intuitive parameters or acquiring a training dataset.

Renal function improvement correlates with 3D echocardiographic findings: Effect of surgical mitral valve repair.

The association between surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) and renal function is not sufficiently well-known. We tried to evaluate renal function before and after the procedure of surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) in degenerative severe MR. Patients with primary severe (4+) MR and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) that underwent SMVR, examined by a cutting-edge 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic probe were enrolled in this study. We took three CKD-EPI equations to measure estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before SMVR and shortly before patients discharge. A total of 40 patients with baseline lower mean eGFR were evaluated. Measurements substantiated statistically significant improvements in eGFR (p < 0.001), multivariable linear regression modeling indicating prominent associations between increase in eGFR and decrease of MR (p = 0.003), decline of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (p = 0.018), as well as increment of forward stroke volume (p = 0.02), in spite of LVEF reduction, left ventricular global longitudinal strain worsening and left atrial ejection fraction impairment. Renal function improves after SMVR in patients with degenerative significant MR and preserved LVEF, regardless of cardiac functional worsening.

Ventricular septal defect following mitral valve replacement.

Mitral valve surgery (MVS), with repair preferred to replacement, is a common procedure for the treatment of severe primary mitral regurgitation related to leaflet prolapse. Structural complications after MVS include left ventricular outflow obstruction, paravalvular leak and atrial septal defect. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography and predischarge transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) specifically screen for these complications. Ventricular septal defect (VSD), a known complication after aortic valve surgery, is rarely reported after MVS. Recently, unsuccessful valvuloplasty prior to replacement was suggested as a risk factor. We present such a case and explore mechanisms with advanced cardiac imaging. In this case, the patient was found to have an elongated membranous septum that likely predisposed her to septal injury. Finally, we provide guidance on specific transoesophageal/transthoracic echocardiography views to avoid a missed diagnosis.

The effect of a smaller spacer in the PASCAL Ace on residual mitral valve orifice area.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an established treatment for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) associated with a risk of creating iatrogenic stenosis. To investigate the impact of the P10 and its larger spacer compared to the narrower Ace and its smaller spacer on reduction of mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) during M-TEER. Consecutive patients undergoing M-TEER for treatment of severe FMR were screened retrospectively. Patients with a single PASCAL device implantation within the central segments of the MV leaflets, non-complex anatomy, and baseline MVOA ≥ 3.5cm2 were selected. Intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography was used to compare MVOA reduction with 3D multiplanar reconstruction and direct planimetry. Device selection did not follow a prespecified MVOA threshold. Seventy-two patients (81.0 years, IQR {74.3-85.0}) were included. In 32 patients, the P10 was implanted (44.4%). MR severity (p = 0.66), MR reduction (p = 0.73), and body surface area (p = 0.56) were comparable. Baseline MVOA tended to be smaller in P10 patients with the larger spacer (5.0 ± 1.1 vs. 5.4 ± 1.3cm2, p = 0.18), however, residual MVOA was larger in these patients (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6cm2, p = 0.03). Accordingly, relative MVOA reduction was significantly less in P10 patients (- 45.9 ± 7.6 vs. - 56.3 ± 7.0%, p < 0.01). Indirect annuloplasty was more pronounced in Ace patients whereas mean transmitral gradients were similar. In FMR patients with non-complex anatomy, the larger spacer of the P10 maintains greater MVOA with similar MR reduction. Hence, the use of the PASCAL Ace device in patients with small MVOAs might correlate with a risk of both clinically relevant orifice reduction and even iatrogenic stenosis.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair vs. isolated mitral surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: a French nationwide study.

Mitral valve surgery and, more recently, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are the two treatments of severe mitral regurgitation in eligible patients. Clinical comparison of both therapies remains limited by the number of patients analysed. The objective of this study was to analyse the outcomes of mitral TEER vs. isolated mitral valve surgery at a nationwide level in France. Based on the French administrative hospital discharge database, the study collected information for all consecutive patients treated for mitral regurgitation with isolated TEER or isolated mitral valve surgery between 2012 and 2022. Propensity score matching was used for the analysis of outcomes. A total of 57 030 patients were found in the database. After matching on baseline characteristics, 2160 patients were analysed in each arm. At 3-year follow-up, TEER was associated with significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.685, 95% confidence interval 0.563-0.832; P = .0001), pacemaker implantation, and stroke. Non-cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 1.562, 95% confidence interval 1.238-1.971; P = .0002), recurrent pulmonary oedema, and cardiac arrest were more frequent after TEER. No significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.967, 95% confidence interval 0.835-1.118; P = .65), endocarditis, major bleeding, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction. Our results suggest that TEER for severe mitral regurgitation was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality than mitral surgery at long-term follow-up. Pacemaker implantation and stroke were less frequently observed after TEER.

Comparative analysis of different risk prediction tools after mitral Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

BackgroundTranscatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an established treatment for primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR). The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of different risk scores for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization after TEER. MethodsWe analyzed data from 206 patients treated for MR at a tertiary European center between 2011 and 2023 and compared the accuracy of different mitral and surgical risk scores: EuroSCORE II, GRASP, MITRALITY, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore, and STS for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in PMR and SMR. A subanalysis of SMR-only patients with the addition of COAPT Risk Score and baseline N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) list was also performed. ResultsMITRALITY had the best discriminative ability for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.74, respectively, in a composed group of PMR and SMR. In a SMR-only population, MITRALITY also presented the best AUC for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with values of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively. ConclusionMITRALITY was the best mitral TEER risk model for both 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in a population of PMR and SMR patients, as well as in SMR patients only. Surgical risk scores, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore and NT-proBNP alone showed poor predictive values.

Contemporary Surgical Treatment for Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Contemporary Surgical Treatment for Functional Mitral Regurgitation