Treatment Of Mandibular Condylar Fractures Research Articles

Influence of Method of Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures on Range of Articular Path Measured by Cadiax Device.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the function of the treated temporomandibular joint based on the analysis of the image of the articular path using the Cadiax device depending on the choice of treatment method for unilateral condylar fracture of the mandible. Methods: Sixty patients who were treated for condylar fractures of the mandible at the Maxil-lofacial Surgery Department in Katowice were qualified for the analysis of the range of movements of the mandibular heads using the Cadiax device. From the group of patients who suffered fractures of the mandible, including condylar processes, patients were finally qualified for the measurement of the articular path of the injured and healthy joint according to strict criteria. Results: The condylar examination was performed in 20 patients who had conservative condylar fracture treatment and 40 patients who underwent various surgeries in the course of a single condylar fracture. The control group consisted of 20 patients whose mean values for the articular pathway measured for both sides were 12.73 and 12.69 and fell within the standard developed for healthy joints tested with the Cadiax device. Conclusions: We have achieved an almost ideal treatment for condylar fractures. We are also beginning to notice the need for rehabilitation of patients after this type of surgery.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Bone Remodeling After Closed Treatment for Mandibular Condylar Head Fracture.

Closed treatment of mandibular condylar fractures has been used for its indications based on the fracture site, fracture status, and patient age. Posttreatment mandibular condyle size is associated with mandibular function; however, a few studies have reported bone remodeling patterns and volume changes in the condyle and glenoid fossa after mandibular condylar head fractures (CHFs). Therefore, volumetric changes in the mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa were analyzed in the present study, and bone remodeling patterns were evaluated after mandibular CHFs. The present study included 16 condyles from 12 patients who received closed treatment for CHF. After reconstruction of a 3-dimensional skull model, including the mandible, using computed tomography data taken immediately after injury and 6 months after treatment, volume changes in the mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa were analyzed. The condylar volume increased by 0.32±0.66cm3 during the 6-month healing period without statistical significance (P=0.093). Regarding the glenoid fossa, the fossa showed a statistically significant volume increase of 0.41±0.59cm3 (P=0.021), and 12 glenoid fossae (75%) showed downward bone apposition; however, no change or only mild bone resorption was observed in 4 glenoid fossae (25%). The results of this study indicated that the volume changes in the mandibular condyle after closed treatment of a mandibular CHF are not significant, and the glenoid fossa adapts to the displaced mandibular condyle through downward growth accompanied by volume increase.

Complications in the Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fracture, Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Treatment

Background: The facial fractures include Condylar fractures are most common in mandibular fractures, which have the highest fracture incidence after nasal bone fractures. Three different traumatic forces can result in condylar injury: the first is energy imparted to a static person by a moving object, such as a blow to the face from a cricket bat; the second is a moving person striking a static object, such as a child falling and striking the ground; and the third is a combination of the first two forces, such as when a person is moving and an automobile is moving and is hit by an automobile. This kind of force typically has the biggest impact and causes the most severe injury patterns. Objective: To compare frequency of Complications of two procedures for the treatment of mandibular condylar fracture surgical versus conservative treatment. Methodology: This Randomized control trial was held in the Tertiary Care Hospital Karachi for 6 months from 12 Jul, 2019 to 12 Jan, 2020. ERC were taken before data collection. Patients suffering from mandibular condylar fracture and fulfilling exclusion and inclusion criteria and who were ready to give informed consent after explaining study protocol, risk benefit ratio and data usage for research were included in our study. The first group labelled as "A" was treated by closed reduction and immobilization and second group labelled as group "B" was undergone internal fixation and open reduction. Results: The mean age and standard deviation of the 72 patients was determined to be 40.85 ± 12.93 years, respectively, with the 18 years was the minimum age and the 65 years being maximum. Frequency of gender was shown in Graph 1.The minimum duration of fracture was 1 day, and maximum were 7 days. The minimum mouth opening was 15mm and maximum was 35mm (Table 1). Trismus was present in 5/72 (6.9%) patients while it was absent in 67/72 (93.1%) patients (Table 2). Malocclusion was present in 20/72 (27.8%) patients while it was absent in 52/72 (72.2%) patients. Unilateral Side of fracture was present in 40/72 (55.6%) patients while Bilateral was present in 32/72 (44.4%) patients (Table 3) Conclusions: In conclusion, closed reduction had clinically satisfactory results, although open reduction and internal fixation produced more accurate to reduce the complications. Keywords: Closed reduction, Internal fixation, Open reduction,complications

Technical approaches and clinical outcomes of the treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction with prostheses: a systematic review

Introduction: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacement is usually a last resort in the surgical treatment of end-stage joint disease. For all this gear to work efficiently, occlusion, articulation, musculature, ligaments, and psychological factors must be in complete harmony. As a treatment, implantation of a total alloplastic TMJ prosthesis. Objective: It was to demonstrate, through a systematic review, the main considerations and clinical outcomes of the treatment of temporomandibular disorders with different types of prostheses. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from February to April 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 2013 to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 127 articles were found, 60 articles were evaluated and 31 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 12 studies with a high risk of bias and 33 studies that did not meet GRADE. Based on the results, temporomandibular disorders (TMD) treatment is diverse and depends on the type of disease, as well as the duration and subjective level of pain. Alloplastic reconstruction can be advantageous in obtaining a rapid improvement in symptoms and rapid rehabilitation of masticatory function. Treatment of functional TMD is commonly based on conservative therapy, including physical therapy, pain therapy, and splinting therapy. Depending on the severity of TMD, treatment varies according to the degree of surgical invasion. Thus, the TMJ prosthesis seems to be reserved for patients with persistent pain, bone or fibrous ankylosis, or osteomyelitis after primary closed or open treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. Quality of life, mouth opening, and daily eating improved significantly after total TMJ prosthesis.

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SURGICAL VERSUS CONVENTIONAL METHOD IN THE TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR FRACTURES

INTRODUCTION: Mandible is one of the prominent bones in the facial skeleton. Since the condyle is the weakest portion of the mandible, it is one of the commonest sites of fractures in the mandible which is a protective mechanism as well. Condylar process fractures occur by the impact of an indirect traumatic force on the chin and seldom arise from direct trauma unless accompanied by fracture of the zygoma. Injury to the condylar region deserves special consideration apart from the rest of the mandible because of anatomical differences and healing potential.AIM OF STUDY: This is a prospective randomised study aimed to evaluate the functional outcome following non-surgical and surgical methods in the treatment of condylar process fractures. This study was conducted on 20 patients who MATERIALS AND METHOD: visited the Department of Dentistry, Darbhanga Medical College and Hospital, and who fullled the inclusion criteria were selected for the study after taking written informed consent and obtaining clearance from institutional ethical committee. We can conclude that if the condylar fracture is CONCLUSION: managed by closed reduction, there is more incidence of deviation of mandible towards fracture side as compared to cases managed by open reduction and internal xation. we can conclude that in cases of un-displaced condylar fracture, conservative treatment is preferred and we advice surgical treatment in cases of deviated or displaced condylar fracture.

Comparative evaluation of post treatment CT scan and clinical parameters in open reduction and closed reduction treatment of condylar fractures.

Mandibular fracture is the second most common fracture of facial bone, next to nasal bone. Twenty-five to forty percent of mandibular fractures involve the condyle. In the literature, there exists no consensus "gold standard" treatment for mandibular condylar fractures, and there is a continuing debate on whether condylar fractures should undergo closed or open reduction. Twenty patients who had undergone open reduction and closed reduction treatment were included in the study. Clinically maximal interincisal opening, laterotrusive and protrusive movements, pain on mouth opening, malocclusion, chin deviation on mouth opening, facial nerve palsy, hematoma, infected implant, and bite force were evaluated after a minimum of 3 months postoperatively. Also, a postoperative CT is done to evaluate the anatomical position of fragment. On evaluation of clinical parameters, both groups had comparable results. However, none of the patients in open reduction group had deviation of mandible from midline on mouth opening. Also, better anatomical repositioning is obtained in open reduction group. The results of this study suggest that the open reduction method is a better alternative to closed reduction in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures.

Comparison of three different approaches in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures - Our experience.

The principal transfacial routes described to approach condylar process fractures are preauricular, retromandibular, high submandibular, and their various modifications. The selection of a specific surgical approach mainly depends on the level of condylar fracture, displacement/dislocation of the proximal segment and time elapsed from the date of trauma. Not too many studies proclaim a unanimous consensus on "gold standard" approaches for particular levels of fracture. This study was conducted with the aim to lay down guidelines for determining the ideal surgical approach for treating different condylar fractures based on different clinical situations. This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation of condylar fractures according to preset study design. Inclusion criteria were fracture displacement more than 10 degrees, dislocation, shortening of ramal height more than 2 mm. Patients having maxillofacial fractures other than mandible and condylar fractures in edentulous patients were excluded from this study. The risk of facial nerve injury was more in endaural group and parotid fistula was more evident in retromandibular subparotid group but there was no statistical difference between the groups. The surgical scar was inconspicuous in all three groups. Excellent results were achieved in the other parameters such as mouth opening, range of motion, bite force, and occlusion with all the three approaches. Postoperative CT scan showed satisfactory anatomical reduction. This study concludes that the decision-making on the approach to be selected for any particular condylar fracture depends on the level of fracture, presence of fracture dislocation, and time elapsed from the date of trauma.

Comparative Benefits of Open versus Closed Reduction of Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Many fractures of the mandibular condylar neck are amenable to both open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed treatment. Clinical outcomes following these two modalities remains a topic of debate. This systematic review critically appraises the literature to compare them following these treatment options. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to test the null hypothesis of no difference in clinical outcomes in ORIF versus closed treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Elsevier text mining tool database, and clinicaltrials.gov trial registries were queried from 1946 to 2020. The quality of evidence was determined using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Of 1507 screened articles, 14 met inclusion criteria. ORIF was favored significantly when evaluating temporomandibular joint pain [relative risk (RR), 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.7] (number needed to treat to prevent an outcome in one patient, 3; 95% CI, 2 to 6), laterotrusive movements of the mandible (mean difference, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.0) (standardized mean difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.3), and malocclusion (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4 to 0.7) (number needed to treat to prevent an outcome in one patient, 19; 95% CI, 10 to 200). However, ORIF yielded a higher incidence of postoperative infection (RR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 13.8) and must be weighed against the understood risk of facial nerve injury. Meta-analysis of high-level evidence in randomized controlled trial suggests that ORIF significantly improves functional outcomes, decreases pain, and restores occlusion and jaw symmetry. These long-term benefits must be weighed against the increased risk of postoperative infection and exposure of the facial nerve to potential injury.

Functional Orthodontic Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures in Children and Adolescent Patients: An MRI Follow-Up.

Background: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate and follow up a conservative treatment approach with functional orthodontic appliances for the management of mandibular condyle fractures in children and adolescent patients. Methods: Between 2020 and 2022, the treatment records of patients with mandibular condyle fractures receiving a functional orthodontic treatment (FOT) were evaluated. In addition to the clinical and functional findings, magnetic resonance images of the mandibular condyles and surrounding structures were assessed. Results: Out of 61 patients, 8 met the inclusion criteria. The follow-up examination records showed no functional limitations. In 75% of cases, mild midline deviations persisted (mean 1.1 mm) without significant alterations to the occlusal relationships. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the remodeling of the condyles and the restitution of the ramus heights, even in dislocated and displaced fractures. In three cases, a partial displacement of the articular disc was observed at the follow-up. No differences in the remodeling patterns were noted depending on age, sex, or fracture location. Conclusions: A FOT led to favorable functional and morphologic outcomes, supporting the concept of a conservative functional approach in children and adolescent patients. Functional adjunctive therapy should be considered in the conservative treatment of mandibular condyle fractures in growing patients.

Modified Blair Approach for the Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures.

Purpose:The management of fractures of the condyle of the mandible has been a topic of debate and still no consensus exists in the literature about the most appropriate approach. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified Blair approach for the open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fractures.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 18 patients with 20 mandibular condyle fractures from 2014 to 2020. All patients were treated surgically using the modified Blair approach. Postoperative occlusion status and mouth opening were assessed for treatment outcomes. Also, the rate of complications such as facial nerve paralysis, wound infection, hematoma, salivary fistula, Frey syndrome, and greater auricular nerve paraeesthesia evaluated.Results:Seventeen out of 18 patients (94.4%) achieved their original pretraumatic occlusion after the surgery. One patient (5.5%) had postoperative occlusal interference due to premature dental contact. The maximal postoperative interincisal distance was measured with a range between 33 and 41 mm (mean 37.6 mm). One patient (5.6%) had transient facial nerve palsy. Also, salivary fistula developed in 1 (5.6%) patient in the postoperative period.Conclusion:The results of this study revealed that the modified Blair approach provides satisfactory clinical outcomes with low complication rates and may offer an alternative, safe, and effective method for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condyle fracture.

Facial Nerve Weakness Following Retromandibular Transparotid Approach for Subcondylar Fractures of Mandible- A Series of Five Cases

Mandibular condyle fractures are the most commonly reported mandible fractures. The incidence of condylar fractures is 25-30% among all mandibular fractures and there are ongoing controversies about their management. The retromandibular transparotid technique is the most frequently employed technique to manage fracture of mandibular condyle. The benefits of this method have been reported to include a shorter working distance between the incision and the fracture site, less morbidity to the facial nerve as it can be identified and retracted under direct vision, cosmetically pleasing outcomes and ease of reduction/fixation of fractures. Nevertheless, surgical treatment of mandibular condyle fractures, can pose danger to facial nerve branches. With respect to condylar fracture surgical treatment, the prevalence of Facial Nerve (FN) injury has been reported to be around 12-48%. This case series reports the surgical and postoperative journey of five patients with subcondylar fracture. The retromandibular transparotid technique was applied in all patients for Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). Using the House-Brackman facial grading system, FN weakness was assessed. Postoperatively, FN weakness was evident after 24 hours of surgery in two patients. With a mean recovery period of two months, all patients maintained FN function at three months. None presented with persistent paralysis of the facial nerve. Parotid fistulation was not observed in any patient. Inconspicuous scar after six months was observed in four patients. The retromandibular transparotid approach is a safe and effective technique that gives less morbidity to the facial nerve, excellent access, good cosmetic results and patient satisfaction.

Intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation in condylar fracture.

For treatment of mandibular condyle fracture, this article introduces the surgical protocol of intraoral reinsertion after extracorporeal fixation. This efficient, anatomically acceptable, extraoral scar-free, and relatively uncomplicated approach for condylar fracture can be compared with conventional extraoral fixation through various approaches. Clinical step-by-step procedures with a scientific basis were described in this technical strategy note.

Kondil Kırıklarında Ortotropik Mandibula Modeli ile Sonlu Eleman Analizleri Kullanılarak Titanyum ve Rezorbe Olabilen Miniplak Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

ABSTRACT
 Background: Mandibular fractures comprise a large portion of facial injuries. According to comprehensive series published, 17.5 - 52% of mandibular fractures are condyle fractures. With the development of plate and screw systems, open reduction and internal rigid fixation have also become methods that are accepted. Titanium miniplate and screw systems or resorbable plate and screw systems are used for this purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare the superiorities of titanium plate and screw systems to the superiorities of resorbable plate and screw systems on an orthotropic mandibular model using the finite element analysis (FEA) method.
 Method: With finite element analysis, stress values in bone, plate, and callus and the amount of displacement in plates and fragments with Von Mises forces were examined.
 Result: It was observed that solitary resorbable plates do not generate adequate stability.
 Conclusion: It was observed that titanium plate and screw systems were mechanically superior to resorbable plate and screw systems in the open treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. However, to fully support this opinion, studies with different designs using new resorbable plates are required.

Inter Maxillary Fixation Versus Open Reduction for the Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures: A Comparative Evaluation.

Background:The treatment for fractured mandibular condyles aims at restoring the masticatory ability, occlusion, symmetry, and function as the bit were before the trauma. The treatment of the mandibular condylar fracture can be done based on the two protocols.Aims:The present clinical trial was conducted to collate aftertreatment upshot of closed treatment and open surgical treatment for mandibular condyle fractures.Materials and Methods:Forty-two patients were divided into two groups (n = 12) which were treated with either the closed reduction using intermaxillary fixation or open reduction and internal fixation. The following clinical parameters were assessed at 1st and 3rd day and at 1, 3, and 6 weeks: lateral excursion and protrusion, occlusion; interincisal opening, mandibular ramus height, deviation/deflection during jaw opening, and pain assessment using visual analog score. The collected data were subjected to statistical evaluation.Results:Interincisal opening was found to be 8.125 ± 0.3467 mm and 6.016 ± 0.1528 mm, respectively, for Group I and Group II which was statistically significant (P < 0.00001). At the 3 months and 6th week postoperatively, it was increased in the surgical groups to 17.433 ± 0.3822 mm and 19.175 ± 0.3696 mm, respectively.Conclusion:The present trial suggests surgical open reduction and internal fixation treatment of the mandibular condylar fracture is better than the nonsurgical closed reduction in terms of interincisal opening, lateral excursion, and protrusive mandibular movement range.

Intra-Articular Condylar Fractures: Is Necessary Surgical Treament?

The surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures represents one of the most discussed topics in maxillofacial trauma surgery. Over the years the literature has documented an increasing attitude towards open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these fractures. Some authors have recently increased the indications for ORIF to include intra-articular fractures, which have historically been managed conservatively1,2,3. The authors present their experience in the surgical treatment of intra-articular condylar fractures over a period of five years, from 2009 to 2014. Surgical techniques, early and delayed complica-tions, clinical and radiological outcomes and comparison with conservative treatment are discussed. Keywords: Mandibular Fracture, Condylar Fracture, Trauma.

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR FRACTURES AFTER CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT

Objective: To assess the clinical as well as radiological outcomes of the conservative management of mandibular condyle fractures.&#x0D; Study Design: Cross-sectional comparative study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS), Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry (AFID), Rawalpindi, from Feb 2018 to Aug 2019.&#x0D; Methodology: A total of 60 patients diagnosed as isolated mandible trauma with unilateral condyle fractures were studied. All patients were assessed radiologically on orthopantomogram (OPG) before the start of treatment. They were assessed clinically for maximum mouth opening (MMO), occlusion, pain and masticatory satisfaction before the start of treatment and after conservative management. Conservative Management includes soft diet only or maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) followed by active physical therapy. After 6 months of follow up, pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical parameters and radiological finding were compared.&#x0D; Results: Sixty patients were managed conservatively, among them 37 (62%) were male and 23 (38%) were female with age range of 21-53 years. There was statistically significant decrease in pain (p-value 0.002) and improvement in mastication (pvalue 0.079) before and after the conservative treatment of mandibular condylar fractures. Overall 46 (77%) patients treated with conservative management were satisfied with their mastication and 40 (67%) patients had mild pain on mastication. All the patients showed satisfactory occlusion and had no occlusal discrepancy on last follow up visit. Maximum mouth opening improved from 32.38 ± 4.54 to 40.90 ± 1.75 after treatment. The mean of preoperative ramus length difference of both sides of the mandible was 4.23 ± 2.3 mm............

A Modified Minimally Invasive Approach for the Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fracture.

In this study, we introduced a small "V" shaped incision around the ear lobe modified from fact-lift approach to treat the mandibular condylar neck and subcondylar fractures to further minimize and hide the postsurgical scars. A total of 15 cases with mandibular condylar fractures from low levels of condylar neck to high levels of subcondylar region were treated by this approach. An incision was designed from the posterior rim of the tragus down to the anterior skin wrinkle to the ear lobe, surrounding it, continually up and backward for a little distance, forming a "V"-like shape. After cutting and elevation of the skin flap, the remaining steps were the same as those in trans-parotid mini-invasive approaches. The surgical scars introduced in this study were more hidden than those in other mini-invasive approaches and all patients were satisfied with their aesthetic appearances. We suggested that the modified "V" shaped mini-invasive approach has an advantage in achieving aesthetic results and could be an alternative incision in treating some types of mandibular condylar and subcondylar fractures.

Rehabilitation in the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures.

The objective of rehabilitation after the treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture is to retrieve the effortless, symmetrical opening of the jaws with the preservation of appropriate movements to the sides, and appropriate occlusion without a sense of tension in the mastication muscles or pain sensations. The aim of the article was to establish the conditions of the rehabilitation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) after the surgical treatment of a fractured condyle. The research featured 46 of patients treated surgically between January 2, 2017 and December 30, 2017. The open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) was the method mainly applied. Rehabilitation with the use of the Delphi technique was implemented in each patient. The assessment of the mastication organ was mostly performed at 3 and 6 weeks since the beginning of rehabilitation. In every patient, the interincisal distance was measured; in chosen cases, the range and trajectory of the condyle movements, and the trajectory of the secant point during jaw opening were defined with the use of the Zebris® JMA device. In 45 patients, a full reposition and immobilization of 52 bone fragments of fractured mandibular condyles was obtained. The displacement of the midline of the mandible in occlusion or an incorrect occlusion contact determined the decision on the application of intermaxillary fixation in 8 patients for a period of 2 weeks. The minimal jaw opening of 40 mm was achieved in 41 patients after 6 weeks of rehabilitation. In 5 of the rest of the patients, rehabilitation had to be continued. The reassessment of the X-ray images and additional computed tomography (CT) diagnosis in three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction in those patients revealed the possible causes of difficulties in the restoration of the stomatognathic system functions – the injuries of the muscles or ligaments connected with the joint. The extension of radiological diagnostics with a CT examination may improve the assessment of the restored TMJ function after the surgical treatment of a fractured mandibular condyle.

Assessment of complications of the open treatment of mandibular condylar fractures

The objective of our study was to analyze the complications of open treatment of mandibular condylar fractures operated via various surgical approaches. Thirtyeight patients with 42 fracture sides having moderate to severely displaced condylar fractures were studied. Open treatment was performed, and patients were assessed for complications of open treatment in terms of facial nerve paresis, unaesthetic scar, salivary fistula/sialocele. Facial nerve paresis was noted in 13 (31%) cases, mostly transient in nature (n=9, 69.2%), that recovered within 8 weeks. Furthermore, 5 (11.9%) patients had unaesthetic scar formation, while just 1 (2.4%) case of salivary fistula was observed. Facial nerve paresis was the most common complication of open treatment of mandibular condylar fractures and most of them were observed in cases operated by preauricular approach.

Mandibular Condylar Fracture in a Professional Soccer Goalkeeper: How to Achieve Early Return-to-Play—A Case Report

Sport-related mandibular fracture is a common injury in the field of maxillofacial surgery. However, the treatment of mandibular condylar fractures in professional soccer goalkeepers is rarely reported. A 32-year-old male professional soccer goalkeeper was referred for malocclusion after collision with an opponent player during a game. The patient’s mandible was displaced between the left lower lateral incisor and left lower canine. Computed tomography showed right condylar base fracture with medial displacement and left para-symphysis fracture. Internal fixation using retromandibular anterior trans-parotid approach via 25-mm skin incision immediately below the earlobe and intraoral vestibular approach were performed under general anesthesia 2 days after the injury. The patient was discharged without complications 3 days after surgery, with mandibular protrusion and diduction exercises with limitation of mouth opening. Soft diet and limitation of mouth opening was performed for 4 weeks after surgery. To achieve early return-to-play, rehabilitation based on Fowell and Earls’ return-to-play guidelines following facial fractures was started, with moderate exercise 5 days after surgery, and progressively full exercise without contact 8 days after surgery. He started normal team training with individualized jaw-guard 4 weeks after surgery. His body weight decreased by 2.2 Kg 1 week after surgery, gradually recovered, and became normal 4 weeks after surgery. The patient returned to a game 2 months after surgery. This case report can be a reference case in condylar fractures of professional soccer players, as the available scientific literature is limited with regard to return-to-play after maxillofacial fracture in professional athletes.