Treatment Of Localized Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Iodine-125 low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy are the most common radical treatments for localized prostate cancer, and brachytherapy (BT) also plays a role in this field. Iodine-125 (I-125) low-dose rate (LDR) prostate BT is an established treatment. However, it remains controversial. Specifically, there are a variety of issues, such as indications for combined treatment with external beam radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy, prostate-specific antigen follow-up, the significance of postimplant biopsy, the usefulness of salvage BT and focal therapy, reduction of toxicities, and bladder cancer after BT. In this review, we summarize the recent developments in I-125 LDR BT.

The use of focal therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in Canada: Where are we, how did we get here, and where are we going?

Focal therapy is an emerging treatment for localized prostate cancer. The objectives of this review were to: 1) review how focal therapies are regulated and approved; 2) summarize the scope and quality of the literature regarding safety, efficacy, and side-effects; and 3) outline ongoing clinical trials of focal therapy in Canada. Using the PRISMA framework for scoping reviews, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane from 2021-2024, complementing Hopstaken et al's search up functional and oncologic outcomes. Additionally, we examined the FDA database for regulatory details and ongoing trials in Canada via ClinicalTrial.gov. FDA approval for prostate tissue ablation was granted to high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in 2015 via the de novo pathway; other therapies followed the 510(k) route, citing equivalence to predicate devices. Most studies are in early stages, primarily single-arm, prospective cohort designs. Oncologic outcomes like cancer detection and survival rates, alongside functional data, such as adverse events and erectile function, were assessed. Recurrence-free survival at 48 months ranged from 58-92%, pad-free rates were greater than 95%, and rates of new-onset erectile dysfunction were variable, ranging from no change to 50%. Rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) were low, ranging from 0-14%. Three Canadian clinical trials are actively enrolling participants, and five private clinics were found offering private HIFU, irreversible electroporation (IRE), or transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA). Focal therapy technologies have gained regulatory approval for prostate tissue ablation, and, aside from provincial support for cryoablation in Alberta, are available to Canadians through private payment or clinical trials. Many studies demonstrate promising cancer control and impressive functional outcomes but are limited by their short followup and lack of comparator group. Clinical trial or registry participation should be prioritized to ensure an evidence-based integration into current prostate cancer treatment approaches.

CACA guidelines for holistic integrative management of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) is an epithelial malignancy occurring in the prostate. PC ranks second in incidence among all male malignancies globally by the latest statistics from the World Health Organization. Notably, China has seen a more rapid increase in PC incidence compared to developed European and American nations. By 2022, the newly reported cases and deaths due to PC in China increased to 134,200 and 47,500, respectively. Thus, early diagnosis and standardized treatment for prostate cancer in China remain far-reaching objectives. Burgeoning research on advanced PC and castration-resistant prostate cancer in recent years have paved the way for a new era of integrated treatment methods including novel endocrine drugs, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Future therapies involve precision treatment guided by genetic testing and individualized integrated treatment as part of a multidisciplinary integrated diagnosis and treatment model for PC. The Genitourinary Oncology Committee of the China Anti-Cancer Association (CACA-GU) has invited multidisciplinary experts across fields including surgery, oncology, pathology, radiology, herbal medicine, physiatry, and psychology to collaboratively write, discuss, and revise guidelines on managing PC. The CACA Guidelines for Holistic Integrative Management of Prostate Cancer includes epidemiology, screening and diagnosis, treatment for localized PC, diagnosis and treatment of PC recurrence after radical prostatectomy, management of metastatic PC, traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment of PC, and rehabilitation from PC. This guideline aims to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment management of PC in China. It is more aligned with China’s clinical practice, highlights Chinese characteristics, and bears significant clinical importance.

B-332 Use of urinary volatile organic compounds in monitoring prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Abstract Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer among males and the second cause of cancer-related deaths. PCa treatment involves different methods, and most common is radical prostatectomy (RP), which entails removal of prostate-gland from men who have been diagnosed with PCa. Prostatic-specific-antigen (PSA) has been used for detection of recurrent disease for years. After its introduction as biochemical recurrence (BCR) marker, men with distinct diseases were treated similarly. Overtime, it has been observed that PSA relapse presents several meanings according to clinicopathological features, like Gleason score, PSA-doubling-time, clinical stage, surgical margin status. Despite this, PSA remains main tool to assess disease progression after RP. RP remains primary treatment for localized PCa and has been performed for years with excellent oncologic control. However, approximately 20-40% of patients with clinically localized PCa will present biochemical-recurrence (BCR) after RP, while some with recurrent-metastasis. The study aims to investigate potential volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with men who have undergone RP but still abhor the disease. Methods Urine samples were collected from 110 male adults with biopsy-proven PCa-positive results before and after RP. VOCs in urine were extracted by stir-bar-sorptive-extraction and analyzed using thermal-desorption with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Metabolomics and machine-learning tools used to develop and evaluate models for PCa diagnosis before and after RP. Results PLS-DA and VIP loading plots identified potential VOC panels that could be used to differentiate PCa patients before and after RP and those with BCR and recurrent metastasis. Furthermore, logistic-regression results with validation provide a promising diagnostic model for PCa diagnosis after RP. Conclusions This novel method using urinary VOCs was developed to fill gaps in PCa monitoring after RP. These research findings could aid and fast-track the provision of rapid point of care to the treated PCa patients who still abhor the disease.

Trends in focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2014 to 2023

Focal therapy, a minimally invasive strategy for localized prostate cancer, has been widely employed in the targeted treatment of localized prostate cancer in recent years. We analyzed 1312 relevant papers from the last decade using Web of Science Core Collection data. Our analysis covered countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and references to offer a multifaceted perspective on the development of this field. The U.S. led in publications, contributing over half of the top 10 institutions. Emberton, M from University College London was the most published and cited author. “EUROPEAN UROLOGY” was the top journal by impact factor in 2022. Analysis of references and keywords suggests the prevalence of brachytherapy-related research, while high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryotherapy, and irreversible electroporation (IRE) are emerging as new research focuses. Consequently, more high-quality evidence is necessary to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of these novel therapeutic methods.

Efficacy of brachytherapy versus radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer–propensity score-matched comparison

ObjectiveThe brachytherapy (BT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) are two methods recommended in current guidelines for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). It is difficult to compare the oncological results of these two treatments because of differences in baseline characteristics and treatment selection.we sought to compare the efficacy of BT and RP after propensity score matching(PSM)analysis.MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2021, our institution treated 657 patients with localized PCa (BT: n = 198; RP: n = 459)and followed up for > 2 years. Biochemical recurrence was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of nadir plus 2 ng/ml or higher (Phoenix definition) for BT, and as PSA0.2 ng/ml or greater for RP. PSM was applied based on the age, body mass index, PSA, prostate volume, clinical T-stage, Gleason grade, percentage of positive puncture needles ≥ 1/2, maximum tumor diameter ≥ 5 mm, and follow-up period.ResultsMedian follow-up was 63 months for BT and 52 months for RP. After propensity score adjustment, a total of 294 (147 each) patients remained for further analysis.Kaplan–Meier curves showed no statistically significant difference in clinical relapse-free survivals (cRFS) (p = 0.637),overall survival (OS) (p = 0.726),and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = 0.505).BT was associated with improved biochemical relapse-free survivals (bRFS) compared to RP (p = 0.022), Logistic multivariate analysis based on the whole cohort revealed that clinical T stage ≥ T2b (p = 0.043) and tumor maximum diameter ≥ 5 mm (p = 0.044) were associated with significantly bRFS.ConclusionThe BT and RP group patients exhibited similar cRFS, OS, and CSS. However, patients in the BT groups exhibited better bRFS than those in the RP group.Clinical T stage ≥ T2b and a maximum tumor diameter ≥ 5 mm were independent prognostic factors.

Partial prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Localized prostate cancer treatment aims to balance cancer control with preserving urinary and erectile function. While focal ablative therapies have emerged, their uncertain prognosis prompts exploration of partial prostatectomy. We systematically reviewed its efficacy as a primary treatment, particularly in low-to-intermediate-risk patients. Our review comprehensively analyzed existing studies on partial prostatectomy for localized cancer. We focused on patient selection, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes, emphasizing tumor control, continence, and erectile function. Studies involving multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies for candidate selection were included. Partial prostatectomy, encompassing various techniques, demonstrates promising short-term outcomes in tumor control and functional preservation. Preoperative imaging and biopsy aid in candidate selection. However, longer-term data on cancer recurrence are limited, warranting further investigation. Heterogeneity among studies and the lack of standardized follow-up protocols are notable limitations. Partial prostatectomy offers a minimally invasive and effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer, particularly in selected patients. Preoperative imaging and biopsy play crucial roles in patient selection, while standardized follow-up protocols are needed to assess long-term outcomes. Future research should focus on elucidating its precise role and optimizing patient selection criteria, contributing to improved prostate cancer management strategies. Partial prostatectomy is explored for localized prostate cancer treatment, aiming to balance cancer control with preserving function. Short-term outcomes are promising, but long-term data on recurrence are lacking. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and standardize follow-up protocols.

Urinary Leakage after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is Always Predictive of Functional Results?

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate if and when the presence of radiological urinary leakages of vesico-urethral anastomosis, after robotic radical prostatectomy, could provoke urethral strictures or affect continence recovery. Methods: We enrolled 216 patients, undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2020 and December 2022 in three high-volume referenced centres for robotic surgery. Before removal of the bladder catheter, all patients underwent a cystourethrography in which the presence/absence of leakage was assessed at level of vesico-urethral anastomosis. Based on degree of severity of urinary leakage on cystourethrography, patients were classified as no leakage or grade 0, grade 1 with transversal diameter ≤1 cm, and grade 2 with transversal diameter ≥1 cm. At follow-up, urethral stenosis formation and urinary continence recovery were assessed; furthermore, post-operative 12-month functional outcome was determined using EORTC-QLQ-PR25 questionnaire. Results: Radiological urinary leakage was found in 30 patients with grade 1 and 33 patients with grade 2, for a total of 63 patients. Only 1 patient (1.5%), grade 2 urinary leakage, developed significant urethral stricture and required endoscopic urethrotomy after 6 months. Analysing the differences in those who removed the bladder catheter after 7–9 days and those who kept it longer, we found no statistically significant differences regarding recovery of continence (p = 0.23) or about urinary symptoms (p = 0.94). Conclusions: RARP remains gold-standard approach for treatment of localized prostate cancer and the superiority of this technique is safe in preventing urethral strictures and continence recovery, even in presence of significant anastomotic urinary leakage.

Salvage therapies for biochemical recurrence after definitive local treatment: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

Recent advancements in the management of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following local treatment for prostate cancer (PCa), including the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), have broadened the spectrum of therapeutic options. We aimed to compare salvage therapies in patients with BCR after definitive local treatment for clinically non-metastatic PCa with curative intent. In October 2023, we queried PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies reporting data on the efficacy of salvage therapies in PCa patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). The primary endpoint was metastatic-free survival (MFS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We included 19 studies (n = 9117); six trials analyzed RT-based strategies following RP, ten trials analyzed hormone-based strategies following RP ± RT or RT alone, and three trials analyzed other agents. In a pairwise meta-analysis, adding hormone therapy to salvage RT significantly improved MFS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.84, p < 0.001) compared to RT alone. Based on treatment ranking analysis, among RT-based strategies, the addition of elective nodal RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was found to be the most effective in terms of MFS. On the other hand, among hormone-based strategies, enzalutamide + ADT showed the greatest benefit for both MFS and OS. The combination of prostate bed RT, elective pelvic irradiation, and ADT is the preferred treatment for eligible patients with post-RP BCR based on our analysis. In remaining patients, or in case of post-RT recurrence, especially for those with high-risk BCR, the combination of ADT and ARSI should be considered.

Complications leading to hospitalisation 12 months after brachytherapy or high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer: French national from the PMSI-MCO data, 2019 and 2020

Background and purposeProstate cancer can be treated using either brachytherapy or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), which are less invasive than surgery. Although both approaches have proved effective, few studies have looked at the specific causes of hospitalisation due to complications, following these treatments. The aim of this study was to compare the causes of hospitalisation. MethodsA retrospective study was carried out examining the records of patients who had undergone brachytherapy or HIFU treatment for localized prostate cancer in 2019 and 2020, using the French national database: Programme de Médicalisation du Système d’Information − Médecine, Chirurgie, Obstétrique (PMSI-MSO). Data on post-treatment hospitalisations were analyzed. Results3090 patients were included in the study, of whom 1699 underwent brachytherapy and 1391 HIFU procedures. The incidence of hospitalisation was much higher after HIFU than after brachytherapy, notably due to a higher rate of obstructive complications (12.94% vs 2.77%). Large differences were also found for infections (8.20% vs 1.47%) and bleeding (6.76% vs 2.18%) leading to hospitalisation. Most of the complications occurred at the initial hospitalization: 12% for HIFU, and 1.4% for brachytherapy. ConclusionComplications were more frequent after treatment with HIFU than with brachytherapy in the year following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Further the causes of hospitalisation differed between the two treatments. These differences need to be taken into account in the therapeutic strategy, as well as in post-treatment management.

Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description.

We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and learning curve of extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and introduced innovative surgical techniques to maintain the instrument positions during the procedures. A cohort of 100 patients underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP at our institution from December 2021 to April 2023. The procedures were performed by an experienced urology surgeon utilizing two surgical techniques for dissecting the posterior aspect of the prostate-"changing instrument roles" and "using camera inversion"-to prevent positional shifts between the camera and instruments. The mean operation time for SP-RARP was 93.58 minutes, and the mean console time was 65.16 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss during the procedures was 109.30 mL. No cases necessitated conversion to multi-port robot, laparoscopy, or open surgery, and there were no major complications during the hospital stay or in the short-term follow-up. Early outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy indicated a biochemical recurrence rate of 4.0% over a mean follow-up duration of 6.40 months, with continence and potency recovery rates of 92.3% and 55.8%, respectively. Analysis of the learning curve showed no significant differences in operation time, console time, and positive surgical margin rates between the initial and latter 50 cases. Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in skilled hands. Continued accrual of cases is essential for future comparisons of SP-RARP with multiport approaches.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Outcomes From Three Prospective Trials

Background and purposeStereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is growingly accepted for the treatment of localized prostate cancer with recent randomized trials showing non-inferiority compared to conventional or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy. The natural history of prostate cancer necessitates extended surveillance for recurrence; however, there are few prospective studies reporting long-term outcomes. Materials and methodsThis study included patients with low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer from three Canadian clinical trials enrolled from 2006-2013. All patients received SABR to the prostate consisting of 35-40 Gy in 5 fractions over 11-29 days. PSA, distant metastasis, and vital status were prospectively recorded. Occurrence of second malignancy after treatment was assessed by chart review and classified using modified Cahan's criteria. Results267 patients were included. Median follow up was 10.3 years (IQR 7.8 – 12.7). 10-year BF (95% CI) was 7.7% (3.9-11.5). 10-year OS, PCSS, and FFM were 84.1% (79.3 – 89.1%), 99.2% (98.1 – 100), and 98.8% (97.5-100), respectively. 27/267 (10.1%) patients experienced a SM, with 6/27 patients (22.2%) classified as having a SM likely (n=3) or possibly (n=3) related to prior radiotherapy. 10-year freedom from SM was 89.2%. ConclusionSABR shows excellent long-term disease control for low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. Patients treated for prostate cancer have a moderate risk of second malignancy, consistent with background rates for the population.

Salvage local treatment for recurrent prostate cancer after focal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo evaluate the role of salvage local treatment in managing recurrent PCa following FT, focusing on oncological and functional outcomes. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA framework. A comprehensive literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed until July 2023. Eligible studies included patients with clinically localised PCa initially treated with FT, who experienced relapse during surveillance and subsequently underwent salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP), salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) or salvage focal therapy (sFT). The primary endpoint was the biochemical recurrence rate post-salvage treatment. The secondary endpoints were functional outcomes, including urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction rates. ResultsIn 26 retrospective studies including 990 patients, the overall pooled biochemical recurrence rate postsalvage treatment was 26%. The subgroup analysis revealed a biochemical recurrence rate of 20%, 22%, and 42% after sRP, sEBRT, and sFT, respectively. The overall pooled rate of urinary incontinence was 20%. Salvage FT had the lowest prevalence of urinary incontinence, followed by sRP and sEBRT. The overall pooled rate of erectile dysfunction was 43%. Salvage RP had the highest prevalence of erectile dysfunction, followed by sFT and sEBRT. Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the studies, primarily due to different sample sizes. Meta-regression analysis revealed no to low contributions of salvage treatment modalities, extent of ablation, age, prostatic specific antigen level before salvage treatment, proportion of patients with Gleason score ≥7 at recurrence, and time between the primary and salvage therapies to heterogeneity. ConclusionSalvage local treatment for recurrent PCa after FT is feasible, and it provides acceptable oncological and functional outcomes. Among all treatment modalities, sRP and sEBRT appeared to have the lowest biochemical recurrence rates, whereas sFT was associated with improved functional outcomes.

1625P Fuzuloparib combined with abiraterone in the neoadjuvant treatment of localised high-risk prostate cancer (FAST-PC): A single-arm phase II study

1625P Fuzuloparib combined with abiraterone in the neoadjuvant treatment of localised high-risk prostate cancer (FAST-PC): A single-arm phase II study

Focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Traditional treatments for localized prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy but pose challenges due to treatment related side effects, namely erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. In recent years, focal therapy has emerged as a viable treatment option for localized low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in carefully selected patients. Short and medium-term studies show acceptable cancer control outcomes and reduced morbidity when comparing focal therapy to whole gland treatment for prostate cancer, however there is paucity of long-term studies. Here we review focal ablative therapies commonly used, discuss the role of imaging in monitoring treatment, and summarize oncologic outcomes based on studies to date.

Final Results of the ANDROCAN Study: Histopathological Characteristics and Biochemical Recurrence at 5 Years of Localized Prostate Cancer According to Preoperative Gonadal Status

Background and objectiveFailure rates after first-line treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatment remain high; therefore, it is essential to improve the selection and identification of at-risk patients to reduce mortality. The aim of the ANDROCAN study was to evaluate the biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with localized PCa treated by total prostatectomy at 5 yr after surgery, according to their presurgery gonadal status. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted including 1318 patients undergoing total prostatectomy for localized PCa with a 5-yr postoperative follow-up. Clinical and hormonal data (assays of total testosterone [TT], bioavailable testosterone [BT], dihydrotestosterone, estrone, and estradiol were performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry) as well as metabolic syndrome parameters were collected at baseline before surgery. Pathological data (predominant Gleason grade 4 and stage) were collected and cross-referenced centrally. Factors associated with BCR were assessed by a multivariate analysis, and BCR-free survival was assessed by a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Key findings and limitationsAmong the 1318 patients, 237 had BCR of PCa. Considering demographic characteristics, populations with and without BCR were similar. However, patients with BCR had cancers with a higher Gleason score (p = 0.0001) and higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (p = 0.0005) at baseline. Gleason score, pT >3a, and PSA level at baseline were positively correlated with BCR (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0048, respectively), while BT and TT levels were not associated with BCR. This study includes patients with varying clinical characteristics, such as cancer history and metabolic syndrome, introducing variability that makes it challenging to isolate the specific effects of gonadal status on BCR. Another limitation is the lack of evaluation of long-term BCR beyond 5 yr, potentially overlooking recurrences that occur between 5 and 15 yr after surgery. This could lead to an underestimation of the actual long-term recurrence rates. Conclusions and clinical implicationsOverall, PSA levels, high Gleason score, and pT >3a are associated with a greater likelihood of disease recurrence following initial treatment and could serve as important prognostic indicators for predicting the risk of BCR. In this prospective study, biochemical hypogonadism was not associated with a higher occurrence of BCR within 5 yr of prostatectomy. The biological gonadal status of preoperative patients could potentially be useful for therapeutic decisions but does not provide an indication for the oncological follow-up. Patient summaryFive-year follow up of patients after surgery showed that there is no association between hypogonadism (low levels of total testosterone and bioavailable testosterone) and cancer recurrence. However, cancer recurrence seems to be more associated with aggressiveness of cancer at the time of detection.

Surgical technique for preventing lymphatic complications during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Introduction. Radical prostatectomy (RP) stands the gold standard method of treatment for localised prostate cancer. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is a common surgical procedure that can be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Lymphocele is the most common complication after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and PLND.Objective. To develop a surgical technique aimed at reducing the incidence of lymphocele in patients who underwent RARP with TL and to evaluate its efficacy and safety.Materials &amp; methods. The study included 49 patients who underwent RARP and PLND. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 — patients with free peritoneal flap fixed to the pubic bone after RARP and PLND (n = 25) and group 2 — control group «without peritoneal flap fixation» (n = 24). The average follow-up period was 3 months.Results. No significant differences in clinical parameters were observed between the groups in perioperative period. In postoperative period lymphocele was diagnosed in 5 (10.2%) patients: group 1 — 1 (4%) patients, group 2 — 4 (16.7%). There were no significant differences in lymphocele volume between the groups. In group 1 lymphocele had no clinical manifestation. Symptomatic lymphocele was diagnosed in 1 patient (4.2%) from the control group.Conclusion. The surgical technique of a free peritoneal flap fixation to the pubic bone combined with PLND after RARP may reduce the incidence of lymphocele if compared to the standard technique.

Intrafractional motion and dosimetric analysis in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy with auto beam hold technique

Objective: To summarize our institutional prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) experience using auto beam hold (ABH) technique for intrafractional prostate motion and assess ABH tolerance of 10-millimeter (mm) diameter. Approach: Thirty-two patients (160 fractions) treated using ABH technique between 01/2018 and 03/2021 were analyzed. During treatment, kV images were acquired every 20-degree gantry rotation to visualize 3–4 gold fiducials within prostate to track target motion. If the fiducial center fell outside the tolerance circle (diameter = 10 mm), beam was automatically turned off for reimaging and repositioning. Number of beam holds and couch translational movement magnitudes were recorded. Dosimetric differences from intrafractional motion were calculated by shifting planned isocenter. Main Results: Couch movement magnitude (mean ± SD) in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were −0.7 ± 2.5, 1.4 ± 2.9 and −0.1 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. For most fractions (77.5%), no correction was necessary. Number of fractions requiring one, two, or three corrections were 15.6%, 5.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Of the 49 corrections, couch shifts greater than 3 mm were seen primarily in the vertical (31%) and longitudinal (39%) directions; corresponding couch shifts greater than 5 mm occurred in 2% and 6% of cases. Dosimetrically, 100% coverage decreased less than 2% for clinical target volume (CTV) (−1 ± 2%) and less than 10% for PTV (−10 ± 6%). Dose to bladder, bowel and urethra tended to increase (Bladder: ΔD10%:184 ± 466 cGy, ΔD40%:139 ± 241 cGy, Bowel: ΔD1 cm3:54 ± 129 cGy; ΔD5 cm3:44 ± 116 cGy, Urethra: ΔD0.03 cm3:1 ± 1%). Doses to the rectum tended to decrease (Rectum: ΔD1 cm3:−206 ± 564 cGy, ΔD10%:−97 ± 426 cGy; ΔD20%:−50 ± 251 cGy). Significance: With the transition from conventionally fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy to SBRT for localized prostate cancer treatment, it is imperative to ensure that dose delivery is spatially accurate for appropriate coverage to target volumes and limiting dose to surrounding organs. Intrafractional motion monitoring can be achieved using triggered imaging to image fiducial markers and ABH to allow for reimaging and repositioning for excessive motion.

Treatment patterns and oncological outcomes of older adults with metastatic prostate cancer in real-world setting.

The landscape of systemic therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) extensively improved within the last decades resulting in a significantly prolonged overall survival. However, subgroup analyses of phase III trials suggest potentially different overall survival outcomes for older adults. We relied on our institutional metastatic prostate cancer database to identify mHSPC and subsequently mCRPC patients. Older adults were stratified according to age groups 70-74 versus ≥75-79 versus ≥80 years at metastatic occurrence. Subsequently, uni- and multivariable time to mCRPC and overall survival analyses were performed. Of 494 older adults, 217 (44%) were 70-74 versus 180 (36%) 75-79 versus 97 (20%) ≥80 years old. Rates of local prostate cancer treatment differed significantly between all three groups (p < 0.01). Regarding mHSPC treatment, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) were administered in 30-39% of patients and docetaxel with 9% in age group 70-74 years and 6% and 3% in age groups 75-79 years and ≥80 years. Regarding mCRPC treatment, significant differences between treatment proportions were observed (p < 0.01). Most common treatment was ARSI for all three groups. Conversely, chemotherapy was more frequently administered in patients aged 70-74 (16%), relative to 4% and 3% in 75-79 year and ≥80 year aged patients. In univariable and multivariable time to mCRPC analyses, overall survival in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC analyses, no significant differences between all three age groups were observed (all p ≥ 0.3). Treatment patterns differ significantly between older adults with metastatic prostate cancer. However, these differences may not result in differences of overall life expectancy.

Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy: A 9-year update

Background and PurposeHigh dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy is an accepted treatment for localized prostate cancer, but the optimal dose and fractionation schedule remain unknown. We report on the efficacy of a randomized Phase II trial comparing HDR monotherapy delivered as 27 Gy in 2 fractions vs. 19 Gy in 1 fraction with a median follow-up of 9 years. Materials and MethodsEnrolled patients had low or intermediate-risk disease, <60 cc prostate volume and no androgen deprivation use. Patients were randomized to 27 Gy in 2 fractions delivered one week apart vs a single fraction of 19 Gy. Results170 patients were randomized: median age 65 years, median follow-up 107 months and median baseline PSA 6.35 ng/ml. NCCN risk categories comprised low (19 %), favourable (51 %), and unfavourable intermediate risk (30 %). The median PSA at 8 years was 0.08 ng/ml in the 2-fraction arm vs. 0.89 ng/ml in the single-fraction arm. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 8 years was 11.2 % in the 2-fraction arm vs. 35.9 % in the single-fraction arm (p < 0.001). The incidence of distant failure at 8 years was 3.8 % in the 2-fraction arm and 2.5 % in the single-fraction arm (p = 0.6). ConclusionsHDR monotherapy delivered in two fractions of 13.5 Gy demonstrated a persistent cancer control rate at 8 years and was well-tolerated. Single-fraction monotherapy yielded poor oncologic control and is not recommended. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on optimal HDR monotherapy strategies for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.