Treatment Of Ischial Pressure Sores Research Articles

Successful reconstruction of ischial pressure sores with inferior gluteal artery descending branch perforator flap.

Ischial pressure sores often recur, the surgical choice often troubled the surgeon, because surgery repair should consider future reconstructive procedures. The purpose of this article is to present a new surgical option for the reconstruction of primary or recurrent ischial pressure sores by using an inferior gluteal artery of the descending branch perforator flap. A study involving patients suffering from ischial pressure sores was performed from March 2016 to August 2020. Patients with large defects, for which direct closure was not possible, underwent reconstructive surgery using an inferior gluteal artery descending branch perforator flap. Collected data included age, diabetes, wound culture, size of the wound, whether or not negative pressure therapy was received, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications. Patients were followed up through outpatient visits or by telephone. Five patients with ischial pressure sores (four primary and one recurrent) underwent reconstructive surgery with inferior gluteal artery descending branch perforator flap. One patient received colostomy and wound negative pressure therapy before lesion reconstruction. All patients successfully recovered without postoperative complications. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 31 months. No wound disruption or recurrence was recorded. Inferior gluteal artery descending branch perforator flap treatment of ischial pressure sores is a simple and feasible method for preserving the inferior gluteal artery's main vascular perforators and could be used as a future surgical option.

Lambeau fasciocutané sous fessier fiabilisé par une perforante de l’artère fémorale profonde en reconstruction d’escarre ischiatique

The surgical management of pressure ulcers in the paraplegic or quadriplegic population is marked by the high risk of recurrence in the long-term. In the current era of perforator flaps, newer reconstructive options are available for the management of pressure ulcers, decreasing the need to use the classically described muscular or musculocutaneous locoregional flaps. The coverage of ischial sores described in this article by a pedicled flap based on a deep femoral artery perforator, appears to be an effective first-line reconstructive option for the management of limited size pressure ulcers. A number of fifteen paraplegic or quadriplegic patients having at least one ischial bed sore with underlying osteomyelitis were included in this series. The approximate location of the deep femoral artery perforator was initially identified using the "The Atlas of the perforator arteries of the skin, the trunk and limbs", which was confirmed, with the use of a Doppler device. A fasciocutaneous transposition flap was elevated, with the pivot point based on the cutaneous bridge centered on the perforator, and then transposed to cover the area of tissue loss. The donor site was closed primarily. A total of fifteen patients were operated from November 2015 to November 2016. The series comprised of 16 first presentations of a stage 4 pressure ulcers associated with underlying osteomyelitis that were subsequently reconstructed by the pedicled deep femoral artery perforator flap. The healing rate and functional results were both satisfactory. Fasciocutaneous flap reliable by deep femoral artery perforator appears to have a promising role in the treatment of ischial pressure sores. It is an attractive option to spare the use of musculocutaneous flaps in the area. Thus this flap could be used as a first-line option to cover ischial pressure ulcers of limited size.

Treatment of ischial pressure sores. Our experience of 99 patients with 108 sores

Background Ischial pressure sores concern patients in the sitting position and particularly the rehabilitated patients. Spontaneous healing may be very difficult without surgery, and ischial pressure sores have the highest recurrence rate among other decubitus. Furthermore, there is no consensus concerning the ideal surgical technique in order to definitely treat the patients. This is a retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of ischial pressure sores aiming to identify the ulcer recurrence rate per surgical technique and describe the early complications.

Treatment of ischial pressure sores with both profunda femoris artery perforator flaps and muscle flaps.

BackgroundReconstruction of ischial pressure sore defects is challenging due to extensive bursas and high recurrence rates. In this study, we simultaneously applied a muscle flap that covered the exposed ischium and large bursa with sufficient muscular volume and a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap for the management of ischial pressure sores.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 14 patients (16 ischial sores) whose ischial defects had been reconstructed using both a profunda femoris artery perforator flap and a muscle flap between January 2006 and February 2014. We compared patient characteristics, operative procedure, and clinical course.ResultsAll flaps survived the entire follow-up period. Seven patients (50%) had a history of surgery at the site of the ischial pressure sore. The mean age of the patients included was 52.8 years (range, 18-85 years). The mean follow-up period was 27.9 months (range, 3-57 months). In two patients, a biceps femoris muscle flap was used, while a gracilis muscle flap was used in the remaining patients. In four cases (25%), wound dehiscence occurred, but healed without further complication after resuturing. Additionally, congestion occurred in one case (6%), but resolved with conservative treatment. Among 16 cases, there was only one (6%) recurrence at 34 months.ConclusionsThe combination of a profunda femoris artery perforator fasciocutaneous flap and muscle flap for the treatment of ischial pressure sores provided pliability, adequate bulkiness and few long-term complications. Therefore, this may be used as an alternative treatment method for ischial pressure sores.

Ischiatic pressure sores: our experience in coupling a split-muscle flap and a fasciocutaneous flap in a ‘criss-cross’ way

Description of a technique and prospective follow-up study. The aim of this study was to present our experience in the surgical treatment of ischial pressure sores, especially recurrence. The Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Spinal Injuries Unit, CTO Hospital, Rome, Italy. From 1995 to 1997, the authors used in 12 consecutive paraplegic patients, who had a grade III or IV decubitus ulcer in the ischial area only, two different and independent flaps coupled together in a 'criss-cross' musculocutaneous flap: a split-muscle gluteus maximus flap and a rhomboid fasciocutaneous local flap. The average follow-up period was 3 years and 9 months. Details of the operative procedure are presented to prove that this criss-cross closure of the ischial pressure sore beneficial for patients with spinal cord injury. All flaps survived; recurrence of the decubitus ulcer occurred in one patient (8%). Pressure-sore-free survival after surgery was 20 months in the patient with recurrence and an average of 26 months in patients without recurrence. The results obtained confirm this procedure to be safe and useful. We believe this technique to be a valuable alternative for the reconstruction of primary or recurrent ischial pressure ulcers.

Long-term Outcome of Using Posterior-thigh Fasciocutaneous Flaps for the Treatment of Ischial Pressure Sores

Among the many difficult problems presented by patients with spinal cord injuries, management of ischial pressure ulcers remains challenging for reconstructive surgeons. This study describes the long-term outcome of using posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous flaps for the treatment of ischial pressure sores. Between January 1999 and June 2003, 12 patients with ischial sores were enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent early aggressive surgical debridement followed by surgical reconstruction with a laterally based posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous flap. The follow-up period ranged from 24 months to 97 months (mean, 62 months). All the flaps survived, and there were no partial flap losses. Primary-wound healing occurred in all the cases. In two patients, Grade II ischial pressure sores recurred 24 months and 27 months after the operation. There was no recurrence in the other 10 patients. The posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous pedicled flap was a good method for treating ischial bed sores. This flap could be used to treat recurrences observed after primary bed-sore treatment with other methods. The flap was easy to raise, and it did not cause any donor-site morbidity. The long-term outcome of using posterior-thigh fasciocutaneous flaps for the treatment of ischial pressure sores was generally good.

Treatment of Ischial Pressure Sores by Means of Sclerotherapy Using Absolute Ethanol

The ischial region is a common site of pressure sore. The ischial pressure sore with a large subcutaneous bursa is resistant to conservative treatment and tends to require radical surgical treatment. In this article the authors describe their experience with a simple surgical treatment on 8 ischial pressure sores in 7 patients with subcutaneous bursa by means of sclerotherapy using absolute ethanol. This method involves causing the bursa to become scarred and closing it up by sterilizing, fixing, and denaturing by the pharmacologic effect of absolute ethanol instead of surgical excision of the bursa. This alternative method has a possibility of treating pressure sores as well as other fistulous diseases in various areas.

Ischial pressure sores treated with a sensate gracilis myocutaneous flap

There are problems in finding a definitive treatment of ischial pressure sores because recurrence is frequently observed. The aim of surgical procedures is to cover the ischial region with stable and durable tissue, which has a good neurovascular supply. If the patient with ischial pressure sores has sensation above L3 level, the sensate gracilis musculocutaneous flap can be used to treat the defect after resection of the decubitis. This treatment was performed in 12 paraplegic patients in whom sensation was absent below the L3 level. The median age of the patients was 32.5 years, with ten males and two females. Four patients had recurrent pressure sores. The average time of follow-up was 8 months. Sensation was assessed with moving finger tip pressure, warm and cold cylinders, two point discrimination and dermal cortical somatosensory-evoked potential tests. Sensation was present in the transferred flap. Although the gracilis myocutaneous flap can also be used as a nonsensory flap for the reconstruction of ischial pressure sores in paraplegic patients under L3 level, the sensate gracilis myocutaneous flap should be chosen primarily when there is sensation over the gracilis region.

Treatment of ischial pressure sores with an inferior gluteus maximus musculocutaneous island flap: an analysis of 31 flaps

We describe our experience with the use of an island gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap (from its most inferior part) based on perforators from the inferior gluteal artery. The study is based on a series of 27 patients in whom treatment was carried out for 31 ischial pressure sores. Eight patients had postoperative complications in the form of dehiscence of the donor flap site and/or infection. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 32 months. During this period three patients developed recurrent sores which were treated with other flaps. We feel strongly that the use of this flap should be considered as a first choice in the treatment of the mild to moderate size ischial pressure sore. Its advantages include ease in elevation of the flap and the provision of a vascularized bulky flap which also spares the vascular pedicles of adjacent flaps for future use.

Urinary fistulae after radical ischiectomies in surgery of ischial pressure sores.

In the early fifties, total ischiectomy was in vogue as a procedure in the surgical treatment of ischial pressure sores. The immediate results by various authors were impressive. One of us, however (A.E.C.), reported the later development of urethral fistulae and the high incidence of perineal urethral diverticulae. The procedure has been abandoned and few surgeons recommend less radical ischiectomy supplemented by muscle transplantation.