Purpose: Small bowel transplantation is increasingly used as a treatment for intestinal failure and parenteral nutrition failure. The diagnosis of post transplant acute rejection is best made by routine surveillance ileoscopy with biopsies. We therefore performed this study with this specific aim: To review a single institution's experience with post-transplant ileoscopy and biopsies, specifically evaluating the efficacy and safety of random biopsy. Methods: We retrospectively examined the records of all patients who underwent small bowel transplantation at our center and then underwent ileoscopy with biopsies between November 2003 and October 2008. We reviewed all endoscopy and pathology records. Variables examined included: indication, endoscopic findings, anesthetic medications and/or sedatives, complications, and histologic findings. Results: A total of 43 patients were identified, of whom 58% were male. Among these patients, a total of 832 ileoscopies with biopsies were performed for post-operative surveillance of acute rejection. The only complication reported was bleeding, which occurred in 9 of 832 (1.1%) ileoscopies with biopsies. Each of these exhibited endoscopic evidence of hemorrhage, including: blood clot, oozing, and active bleeding associated with ulceration at a previous biopsy site. Rejection was diagnosed histologically in 119 (14%) biopsies performed; rejection was found in 13 (30%) patients overall. In 26 (22%) of these cases of rejection, endoscopic findings were described as normal. Therefore, 93 (78%) had endoscopic evidence of rejection, including: inflammation, erythema, edema, ulceration, erosion, and mucosal friability. Propofol and/or general anesthesia was used in 295 (35%) procedures. Conscious sedation was used in 283 (34%) procedures. No sedation was given in 254 (31%) procedures. Conclusion: In our institution, ileoscopy for post operative surveillance of acute rejection is a safe diagnostic modality. Random biopsies of normal appearing allograft may increase the diagnostic yield of ileoscopy, but in general histologic rejection is suggested by endoscopic findings. With the relatively high correlation, we found no need to employ zoom endoscopy. Hemorrhage was the only complication seen and was best managed with early repeat endoscopic intervention. Additionally, ileoscopy can safely be performed with little or no sedation. Continued analysis and data sharing should be performed as we try to improve and standardize post-small bowel transplant patient care.
Read full abstract