Abstract Introduction The National Football League (NFL) faces countless challenges in maintaining a fair and competitive playing field while protecting player health. One aspect of concern involves the use of medications to treat infertility, erectile dysfunction (ED), and hypogonadism, which can potentially alter and enhance athletic performance. The NFL's Substance Abuse Policy governs the use of such medications and imposes strict penalties for violations. Several important players have been affected by these rules while attempting treatment for legitimate medical conditions. This project explored the presence of infertility, ED, and hypogonadism treatments among NFL players, assessed the penalties for their misuse, and analyzed the process for obtaining Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs). Objective To provide in-depth analysis of the NFL's Substance Abuse Policy involving medications for infertility, ED, and hypogonadism treatment. Specifically, we evaluated the presence of specific medications in question as compared with the guidelines established by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), examined the penalties associated with misuse, and investigated the procedures for obtaining TUEs. Methods We obtained a copy and conducted a thorough analysis of NFL’s Substance Abuse Policy, focusing on the presence of commonly prescribed medications to treat infertility, ED, and hypogonadism. This was compared to existing WADA guidelines. We then evaluated specific testing procedures and penalties associated with their use. We finally analyzed and delineated the methodology for obtaining a TUE. Results Our analysis of the Substance Abuse Policy revealed 97 prohibited substances encompassing Anabolic/Androgenic Steroids, Protein and Peptide Hormones, Anabolic Agents including Beta-2 Agonists, Anti-Estrogenic Agents, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs). This list was found to be 98% consistent with existing WADA guidelines. Erectile Dysfunction medications were allowed, specifically Viagra, Cialis, and Levitra. Penalties for violating League Policy ranged from fines (calculated using player-specific salary), suspension, bonus forfeiture, and banishment. Regarding TUEs, specifically for hypogonadism, the application process proved to be complex, requiring substantial medical documentation, laboratory testing including FSH, LH, and semen analysis, and expert review. Obtaining a TUE additionally required annual renewal as well as regular serum testing and medical visits. Conclusions The use of medications treating infertility and hypogonadism among NFL players is a valid medical concern. While potential for abuse exists, many players qualify for treatment based on current medical guidelines. The Substance Abuse Policy was comprehensive, including all major infertility and hypogonadism medications while allowing use of common ED medications. Penalties for violations were strict but accompanied by associated review and appeal processes. The TUE system, while complex and time-intensive, provided pathways for players with genuine medical needs to access necessary treatments while maintaining organizational oversight. This study showed the delicate balance maintained by a multi-billion-dollar industry in promoting fair play while simultaneously allowing players to obtain legitimate medical treatments. Further research and collaboration between medical professionals, players, and league officials is needed to further refine this process for future generations. Disclosure No.