Treatment Of High Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux Research Articles

Intravesical and extravesical ureteral reimplantation in children with bilateral refluxing megaureter: comparison of results

Introduction. Extravesical ureteral reimplantation is an accepted technique for the surgical treatment of high-grade vesicoureteral reflux. However, many surgeons continue to use an intravesical technique, including for the megaureter. We present our experience and outcomes with these techniques for primary bilateral refluxing megaureter.Purpose of the study. To improve the results of surgical treatment of refluxing megaureter in children.Materials and methods. A retrospective study was performed of 95 patients who underwent ureteral reimplantation between 2006 and 2019. The age of patients at the time of surgery was from 4 months to 13 years (median — 27.6 months), boys were 71 (74.7%), girls were 24 (25.3%). All patients are divided into 2 groups depending on the method of treatment. Group 1 consisted of 65 patients who underwent Cohen single-stage bilateral transvesical ureteral reimplantation. Group 2 included 30 children who underwent two-stage Barry extravesical ureteral reimplantation. The interval between operations was from 1 to 63 months (median — 5.2 months). Patient demographics, surgical technique and outcomes were recorded. A successful postoperative outcome was defined as improved hydronephrosis and no vesicoureteral reflux.Results. Median follow-up period was 3.2 years. The overall success rate was 80% for patients and 88% for ureters. Postoperative grade III – IV reflux had 15 patients (15,8%) and 16 ureters (8,4%). Persistent ureterohydronephrosis had 4 children (4,2%) and 6 ureters (3,2%). The effectiveness of treatment for patients in the Cohen group was 77%, in the Barry group — 87% (p = 0.408), for ureters — 86% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.223). The difference was not significant despite the higher effectiveness extravesical technique.Conclusion. Extravesical and transvesical ureteral reimplantation are effective methods of treatment for bilateral refluxing megaureter in children.

Endoscopic treatment of grades IV and V vesicoureteral reflux with two bulking substances: Dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer versus polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer in children

PurposeWe aimed at evaluating the efficacy and complications of two bulking substances: dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer(Dx/Ha;Dexell®) versus polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer(PPC;Vantris®) in subureteric injection treatment of children with high grades (grades IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux(VUR). MethodsData of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment of high grade VUR (January 2009–August 2015) were retrospectively investigated. Patients with high grade VUR caused by posterior urethral valve, duplex system, paraureteral diverticula and neurogenic bladder were excluded. Classical subureteric injection method (STING) was used. Seventy-three children (45 girls and 28 boys) who had 88 refluxing renal units (RRUs) with grades IV-V VUR (n=64/n=24) underwent endoscopic treatment using Dx/Ha (n=63 RRUs) and PPC (n=25 RRUs). ResultsMean age of patients in Dx/Ha and PPC groups were 6 (3) and 6 (3.75) year (p=0.81), and volumes of these substances given were 1.3 (1) and 1 (0.5) mL (p=0.003), respectively.Overall, for the first endoscopic injection, success rate of grades IV-V VUR per RRU was 53.9% with Dx/Ha, compared to 80% in PPC-injected group, (p=0.024). Late ureterovesical junction obstruction developed only in one patient in PPC-injected group. No ureteral obstruction was observed in Dx/Ha-injected group. ConclusionsEndoscopic injection of PPC resulted in significantly higher success rate, compared to Dx/Ha in subureteric injection treatment of children with high grade VUR.However, the development of late ureterovesical junction obstruction should also be taken into account in PPC injection.

High success rate with new modified endoscopic treatment for high-grade VUR: A pilot study with preliminary report

Despite the benefits of the minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) it has a major drawback which is low success rate in high grade VUR. For overcoming this problem, we introduce a new modified technique of endoscopic treatment called periureteral injection technique (PIT). In a prospective study a total of 37 ureters in 19 boys and 14 girls were treated, including 3 bilateral cases. Of 37 units, 30 (81.1%) had grade IV and 7 (18.9%) had grade V primary VUR (18 right, 13 left and 3 bilateral units). Subureteral injection of Vantris(®) was done at the 5-o'clock and 7-o'clock positions in which the direction of injecting needles were almost parallel. Pre- and post-operative evaluation included urinalysis, urinary tract ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), dimercaptosuccinic acid scan and urodynamic studies. The median age was 38 months (range 8-125). At 6 months follow up period confirmed with VCUG, the VUR has been disappeared in 34 (91.8%) units and 3 units [2 (5.4%) grade II and 1 (2.7%) had grade III)] had downgraded VUR. Complications included early fever due to urinary tract infection in 1 children, transient dysuria in 2 patients and low back pain in one patient (Summary Table). The success rate of PIT for treatment of high grade VUR is high. However, further studies with more patients and longer follow up periods are needed to draw final conclusion.

Robotic Extravesical Anti-Reflux Operations in Complex Cases: Technical Considerations and Preliminary Results

Objectives: To evaluate technical aspects and outcome of robotic laparoscopic extravesical anti-reflux surgery in the treatment of high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) with associated complicating conditions. Materials and Methods: Retrospective database and chart reviews were performed to identify a subgroup of patients with high-grade VUR who underwent robot-assisted anti-reflux surgery using the extravesical Lich-Gregoir repair and who additionally had preoperatively known complicating factors. Five such patients were operated on from 2005 to 2009. All had bilateral VUR, bladder dysfunction, breakthrough infections, renal scarring or at least one of the following complicating factors: posterior urethral valve bladders, duplex systems or para-ostial diverticula. Outcome and surgical aspects were assessed. Results: At follow-up 9 of 10 ureters were free of reflux and diverticulae had disappeared completely. No lasting urinary retentions occurred but two boys needed reinsertion of a catheter for 24 h after surgery. No further complications were noted. There were no signs of obstruction, infections did not persist and there was no negative effect on bladder function. Dissection of para-ostial diverticula seemed the only additional technical challenge. Conclusions: Robot-assisted extravesical anti-reflux surgery seems a promising technique in the operative management of this unfavorable subset of patients. Reflux cure rate is higher than expected using injection therapy and at the same time morbidity seems lower than with open surgery. Further experience is needed to confirm these first impressions.

Efficacy of the Modified STING Procedure for the Treatment of High Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux

Purpose: The modified subureteral transurethral injection (STING) has been reported to increase the success of endoscopic treatment of high grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This study was performed to assess the efficacy of the modified STING procedure compared to conventional STING in the setting of high grade VUR. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 consecutive children (46 ureters) with a median age of 5.32 years (range 1 to 10 years) who underwent endoscopic treatment of grade IV to grade V VUR between February 2004 and December 2006. The modified STING was performed by applying a direct pressure stream of irrigation fluid into the ureter in order to define the injection site within the ureteral submucosa. The needle was then placed in the ureteral tunnel, and a dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) was injected into the submucosal intraureteral space, tracking along the entire length of the detrusor tunnel. Modified STING was performed in 27 ureters (grade IV: 13, grade V: 14), and conventional STING was performed in 19 ureters (grade IV: 12, grade V: 7). Follow-up voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) was performed 3 months later. Results: Complete resolution occurred in 82% (22/27 ureters) of the patients undergoing modified STING, including 92% (12/13) of grade IV patients and 71% (10/14) of grade V patients. Three ureters required a second injection to correct VUR. Conventional STING had a success rate of 63% (12/19), [75% (9/12) in grade IV and 43% (3/7) in grade V]. The mean injected volume for the modified STING was 1.23±0.3ml, while that for the conventional STING was 0.95±0.2ml (p=0.03). Conclusions: The modified STING was markedly more successful in the treatment of high grade VUR and carried no significant adverse effects.