Objective To analyze the curative effect of double path endoscopic surgery in the treatment of fungal sinusitis, and to compare with the effect of simple in endoscopic nasal passages windowing. Methods The clinical data of fungal sinusitis patients were analyzed.According to the different surgery way, the patients were divided into two groups.The observation group: nasal endoscopic nasal passages open a window in the joint of fangs nest small windows double path; Control group: simple in nasal endoscopic fenestration. Results The observation group had 35 cases and the control group had 37 cases.After treatment, the symptoms score of the observation group was significantly lower than the control group [(1.09±0.83)points vs (1.47±0.77)points; t=2.015, P=0.048].The effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (94.29% vs 75.68%; χ2=4.813, P=0.028).7 days after treatment, the C-reactive protein(t=4.971, P 0.05).2(t=5.978, P<0.01), 4(t=6.335, P<0.01), 6(t=9.348, P<0.01), and 8 days(t=8.226, P<0.01) postoperatively, 1-3-β-glucan D levels were significantly lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The postoperative recurrence rate of the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (8.57% vs 27.03%, the Log-rank χ2=4.061, P=0.044). Conclusion In fungal sinusitis treatment, the use of endoscopic nasal passages open window joint fangs nest small windows double path can more effectively remove lesions, its forward curative effect is superior to pure in nasal endoscopic fenestration. Key words: Sinusitis, fungal; Natural orifice endoscopic surgery
Read full abstract