Breast-conserving Surgery Treatment Research Articles

Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: the effect of surgery on quality of life in breast cancer survivors in Malaysia

BackgroundIn the competitive health care environment, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) have become the subject of interest to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions as we experience improved breast cancer survival in modern times. The knowledge of the long-term effects of surgery on the QoL in breast cancer patients is currently limited in the Asian setting. The purpose of this longitudinal study is to evaluate the QoL of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS).MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, the QoL of 208 patients who underwent mastectomy and the BCS treatment were assessed, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered at the baseline, 6 and 12 months following diagnosis. One-way ANCOVA was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 208 female survivors of Stage 0–II breast cancer were included, among them 47.1% underwent BCS and 52.9% underwent mastectomy. Older (63.3%), Chinese women (63.6%), and patients with primary education (71.7%) were more likely to undergo mastectomy. At baseline, no significant differences were observed for QoL in both treatment groups. At 6 months, patients who underwent BCS had better social functioning scales( P = 0.006) and worse symptom scales for dyspnoea (P = 0.031), compared to mastectomy patients. One year after diagnosis, the role functioning score of the mastectomy group was significantly higher than the BCS group, specifically among patients who had undergone chemotherapy (P = 0.034).ConclusionPatients who underwent BCS had better social functioning and worse dyspnoea symptoms compared to patients undergoing mastectomy at six months. During one year, there were only significant improvements in the role functioning among the mastectomy groups compared to the BCS groups. After further stratification, only mastectomy patients who received chemotherapy exhibited improved role functioning compared to patients those who did not undergo chemotherapy. Providing social and physical support postoperatively and monitoring patients for cancer worry, or other symptoms in the long-term survivorship period would be important to ensure optimal QoL.

Improvement of proton beam range uncertainty in breast treatment using tissue samples

Objective. Proton therapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can substantially reduce the dose to lung and cardiac structures. However, these dosimetric benefits are subject to beam range uncertainty in patient. The conversion of the CT-Hounsfield unit (HU) into relative stopping power (RSP) is the primary contribution to range uncertainty. Hence, an accurate HU-RSP conversion is essential. Approach. Real tissue samples, including muscle and adipose, were prepared. The water equivalent path length (WEPL) of these samples was measured under homogeneous conditions using a 12-diode detector array of our time-resolved in vivo range verification system (IRVS). The HU-RSP conversion was improved using the measured WEPL and HU for adipose tissue. The measured WEPL values were compared with the treatment planning calculation results based on the stoichiometric CT-HU calibration technique. The effect was investigated for both with and without adipose tissue in HU-RSP conversion. Main results. The IRVS was calibrated based on the solid water phantom. The relative differences in WEPL (RSP) between measurements and calculations for muscle, adipose, and water was −1.19% (−0.75%), −4.25%(−4%), and −0.23%(−0.07%), respectively. Based on the improved HU-RSP conversion, the relative differences in WEPL was reduced to −0.97%(−0.62%), −1.50%(−1.46%), and −0.22% (0.00%), respectively. Significance. The WEPL deviation of adipose tissue is larger than the testing limit of 3.5% for beam range robustness in current clinical practice. However, the improved HU-RSP conversion reduced this deviation. The main component of breast tissue is adipose. Hence, the proton treatment of BCS can be undershooting if no proper measures are taken against this specific uncertainty.

Breast conserving surgery in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2- mutation associated breast cancer

Nowadays, the success of chemotherapy for breast cancer demonstrates high sensitivity and effectiveness, and therefore it has become possible to increasingly use breast conserving surgery treatment. Genetically associated breast cancer patients it is a separate clinical group, the treatment of which should take into account the carriage of mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 genes. Until now, the possibility of breast conserving surgery in such patients remains debatable. After all, we often talk in such patients not only about the need to perform a mastectomy, but also about a prophylactic mastectomy from the contralateral side to minimize the risks of cancer. Is it acceptable to perform breast conserving treatment in such patients? This article analyzes the experience of well-known foreign oncologists, as well as analyzes their own experience of the Department of Oncology and Radiology RUDN University, Head of the Department of Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery of the Mammary Gland and Skin, P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Invasive Second Breast Cancer Among Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Hawaiʻi

Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may develop a subsequent invasive second breast cancer (SBC). Understanding the association of racial and ethnic factors with the development of invasive SBC may help reduce overtreatment and undertreatment of women from minority groups. To evaluate risk factors associated with developing invasive ipsilateral SBC (iiSBC) and invasive contralateral SBC (icSBC) among women with an initial diagnosis of DCIS who are from racial and ethnic minority populations. This retrospective cohort study used deidentified data from the Hawai'i Tumor Registry of 6221 female Hawai'i residents aged 20 years or older who received a diagnosis of DCIS between January 1, 1973, and December 31, 2017. The 5 most populous ethnic groups were compared (Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Native Hawaiian, and White). Data analysis was performed from 2020 to 2021. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics and the first course of treatment. The a priori study outcome was the development of invasive SBC. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with invasive SBC. Factors that were significant on unadjusted analyses were included in the adjusted models (ie, age, race and ethnicity, diagnosis year, DCIS histologic characteristics, laterality, hormone status, and treatment). The racial and ethnic distribution of patients with DCIS across the state's most populous groups were 2270 Japanese women (37%), 1411 White women (23%), 840 Filipino women (14%), 821 Native Hawaiian women (13%), and 491 Chinese women (8%). Women of other minority race and ethnicity collectively comprised 6% of cases (n = 388). A total of 6221 women (age range, 20 to ≥80 years) were included in the study; 4817 (77%) were 50 years of age or older, 4452 (72%) received a diagnosis between 2000 and 2017, 2581 (42%) had well or moderately differentiated histologic characteristics, 2383 (38%) had noninfiltrating intraductal DCIS, and 2011 (32%) were treated with mastectomy only. Of these 6221 women, 444 (7%) developed invasive SBC; 190 developed iiSBC (median time to SBC diagnosis, 7.8 years [range, 0.5-30 years]) and 254 developed icSBC (median time to SBC diagnosis, 5.9 years [range, 0.5-28.8 years]). On adjusted analysis, women who developed iiSBC were more likely to be younger than 50 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.06), Native Hawaiian (aOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.01-5.35), Filipino (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11-3.42), Japanese (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.48), and untreated (aOR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09-4.80). Compared with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, there was a decreased likelihood of iiSBC among women receiving BCS and radiotherapy (aOR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27-0.75), BCS and systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy (aOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.69), mastectomy only (aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.39), and mastectomy and systemic treatment (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.96). Women who developed an icSBC were more likely to be Native Hawaiian (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.10-2.61) or Filipino (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.10-2.63). Risk of both iiSBC and icSBC decreased in the later years of diagnosis (2000-2017) compared with the earlier years (1973-1999). This study suggests that Native Hawaiian and Filipino women who initially received a diagnosis of DCIS were more likely to subsequently develop both iiSBC and icSBC. Japanese women and younger women were more likely to develop iiSBC. Subpopulation disaggregation may help guide clinical treatment and screening decisions for at-risk subpopulations.

Recent Progress for the Techniques of MRI-Guided Breast Interventions and their applications on Surgical Strategy.

With a high sensitivity of breast lesions, MRI can detect suspicious lesions which are occult in traditional breast examination equipment. However, the lower and variable specificity of MRI makes the MRI-guided intervention, including biopsies and localizations, necessary before surgery, especially for patients who need the treatment of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). MRI techniques and patient preparation should be first carefully considered before the intervention to avoid lengthening the procedure time and compromising targeting accuracy. Doctors and radiologists need to reconfirm the target of the lesion and be very familiar with the process approach and equipment techniques involving the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools and the biopsy system and follow a correct way. The basic steps of MRI-guided biopsy and localization are nearly the same regardless of the vendor or platform, and this article systematically introduces detailed methods and techniques of MRI-guided intervention. The two interventions both face different challenging situations during procedures with solutions given in the article. Post-operative statistics show that the complications of MRI-guided intervention are infrequent and mild, and MRI-guided biopsy provides the pathological information for the subsequent surgical decisions and MRI-guided localization fully prepared for follow-up surgical biopsy. New techniques for MRI-guided intervention are also elaborated in the article, which leads to future development. In a word, MRI-guided intervention is a safe, accurate, and effective technique with a low complication rate and successful MRI-guided intervention is truly teamwork with efforts from patients to surgeons, radiologists, MRI technologists, and nurses.

Factors related to re-excision procedures following primary breast-conserving surgery for women with breast cancer in the U.S. Military Health System.

Re-excision surgery is undertaken to obtain clear margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for localized breast cancer. This study examines patient and tumor characteristics related to re-excision surgery in the universal-access Military Health System (MHS). Retrospective analysis of patients with pathologically confirmed stage I-III breast cancer between 1998 and 2014 in the Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry and MHS Data Repository-linked databases who received primary BCS. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression methods identified characteristics associated with re-excision surgery (lumpectomy and mastectomy) and conversion to mastectomy, given as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of 7637 women receiving BCS, 26.3% had a re-excision and 9.9% converted to mastectomy. Tumor location, larger tumor size (≥4 cm), and regional lymph node involvement were associated with a greater likelihood of re-excision and mastectomy conversion. Pathology before BCS (AOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.44 for re-excision) and neoadjuvant treatment (AOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36, 0.69 for re-excision) were associated with a decreased likelihood of these outcomes. Additionally, age, tumor histology, and military-specific variables were associated with mastectomy conversion. Comprehensive preoperative workup, including tumor pathology, may better inform surgical decision-making and reduce re-excision rates.

The quality of invasive breast cancer care for low reimbursement rate patients: A retrospective study

Though evidence-based treatments have been recommended for breast cancer, underuse of the treatments was still observed. To certain extent, patients’ access to care, which can be enhanced by increasing the coverage of health insurance, could account for the current underuse in recommended care. This study aimed to examine the association between different proportions of reimbursement and quality of recommended breast cancer care, as well as length of hospital stay. In this retrospective study, 3669 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1 June, 2011 and 30 June, 2013 were recruited. Seven quality indicators from preoperative diagnosis procedures to adjuvant therapy and one composite indicator were selected as dependent variables. Logistic regression and generalized linear models were used to explore the association between quality of care and length of hospital stay with different reimbursement rates. Compared with UEBMI (urban employment basic medical insurance), which represented high level reimbursement rate, patients with lower rates of reimbursement were less likely to receive core biopsy, HER-2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2) testing, BCS (breast conserving surgery), SLNB (sentinel lymph nodes biopsy), adjuvant therapy and hormonal treatment. No significant difference in preoperative length of hospital stay was observed among the three insurance schemes, however URBMI (urban resident basic medical insurance) insured patients stayed longer for total length of hospital stay. Significant disparities in utilization of evidence-based breast cancer care among patients with different proportions of reimbursement were observed. Patients with lower rate of reimbursement were less likely to receive recommended care. Our findings could provide important support for further healthcare reform and quality improvement in breast cancer care.

Treatment of breast cancer in the elderly: A prospective, population-based Swiss study

The primary objective of this population-based study is to describe the patterns of care of elderly patients with breast cancer (BC), and evaluate potential causative factors for the decrease in BC-specific survival (BCSS) in the elderly. We included all or representative samples of patients with newly diagnosed BC from seven Swiss cancer registries between 2003 and 2005 (n=4820). Surgical and non-surgical BC treatment was analyzed over 5 age groups (<65, 65 to <70, 70 to <75, 75 to <80 and ≥80years), and the predictive impact of patient age on specific treatments was calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The proportion of locally advanced, metastatic and incompletely staged BC increased with age. The odds ratio for performing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in stages I-II BC (0.37), sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in patients with no palpable adenopathy (0.58), post-BCS radiotherapy (0.04) and adjuvant endocrine treatment (0.23) were all in disfavor of patients ≥80years of age compared to their younger peers. Only 36% of patients ≥80years of age with no palpable adenopathy underwent SLND. In the adjusted model, higher age was a significant risk factor for omitting post-BCS radiotherapy, SLND and adjuvant endocrine treatment. This study found an increase in incomplete diagnostic assessment, and a substantial underuse of BCS, post-BCS radiotherapy, SLND and adjuvant endocrine treatment in elderly patients with BC. There is a need for improved management of early BC in the elderly even in a system with universal access to health care services.

Surveillance mammography for Medicaid/Medicare breast cancer patients

Surveillance mammography for breast cancer survivors can detect recurrences early when treatment is most effective. We assessed the receipt of surveillance mammography for elderly breast cancer survivors considering their Medicaid and Medicare dual eligibility and minority status that may make them vulnerable to poor surveillance care. We analyzed Michigan Medicare and Medicaid data for patients, age 66 years or older, diagnosed with early stage breast cancer between 1997 and 2000. Using logistic regression and proportional hazards models, we identified individual and area level factors associated with patients' receipt and timeliness of surveillance mammography for up to 3 years post treatment. In the first year post cancer treatment, patients who received breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation therapy were more likely to receive surveillance mammography than those treated with BCS alone (OR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.48-2.24). Patients who received BCS and radiation treatment also had a greater probability of receiving surveillance mammography sooner than those treated with BCS alone (HR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.56-1.89). Time from treatment to mammography was longer for older (80+ years) versus younger patients (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.45-0.66) and for those with greater comorbidity burden (HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.43-0.81). Regardless of race and dual eligibility, there is a greater likelihood for breast cancer patients who received BCS with radiation to receive surveillance mammography and to receive it sooner than for patients who were treated with BCS alone. Dual eligible, black, and elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation following BCS, thus disparities across the treatment and surveillance continuum need to be further investigated.

Usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology in breast-conserving surgery.

Abstract Abstract #3011 [Objective] In the treatment of breast-conserving surgery, positive margins are closely related to intramammary recurrence, but methods of assessing resection stumps during breast-conserving surgery have not been standardized. The present study investigated the usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology at our department.&amp;#x2028; [Subjects and Methods] From 2005 to 2007, a total of 308 patients underwent breast cancer surgery. Subjects comprised 160 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and touch smear cytology. Results of touch smear cytology were compared to those of histological tissue analysis.&amp;#x2028; [Results] Touch smear cytology displayed 70% sensitivity (14/20), 97.1% specificity (136/140) and a diagnostic accuracy of 93.8% (150/160). Six false-negative cases and 4 false-positive cases were identified. Of the 6 false-negatives, cancer cells were seen in the mammary duct in 5 cases, and the degree of cancer cell atypia in the stump was low. Residual cancer cells were seen in the stump in 18 cases, and additional resection was performed on 16 cases. Cancer cells were identified histologically in the additionally resected tissue in 8 of these 16 cases (50.0%). The direction of positive cytology was towards the mammary papilla in 16 cases, lateral tissue in 5 cases and contralateral mammary papilla in 2 cases. The tendency was that that the greater the cancer cell volume as assessed by touch smear cytology, the higher the frequency of positive margins as assessed by histological tissue analysis.&amp;#x2028; [Discussion] Histological tissue analysis and touch smear cytology can be performed to assess resection stumps during breast-conserving surgery. Histological tissue analysis is accurate, but: 1) analyzing all areas of a large resection stump is difficult; 2) preparing high-quality frozen sections is difficult due to the high adipose content of breast tissue; 3) assessing the malignancy of intraductal proliferating lesions is difficult; and 4) part of the tissue sample is damaged. Touch smear cytology is easy to perform, offering a very useful technique yielding comparable results to histological tissue analysis. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3011.

Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: cancer practice by general surgeons in Iran

BackgroundThere appear to be geographical differences in decisions to perform mastectomy or breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. This study was carried out to evaluate general surgeons' preferences in breast cancer surgery and to assess the factors predicting cancer practice in Iran.MethodsA structured questionnaire was mailed to 235 general surgeons chosen from the address list of the Iranian Medical Council. The questionnaire elicited information about the general surgeons' characteristics and about their work experience, posts they have held, number of breast cancer operations performed per year, preferences for mastectomy or breast conserving surgery, and the reasons for these preferences.ResultsIn all, 83 surgeons returned the completed questionnaire. The results indicated that only 19% of the surgeons routinely performed breast conserving surgery (BCS) and this was significantly associated with their breast cancer case load (P < 0.01). There were no associations between BCS practice and the other variables studied. The most frequent reasons for not performing BCS were uncertainty about conservative therapy results (46%), uncertainty about the quality of available radiotherapy services (32%), and the probability of patients' non-compliance in radiotherapy (32%).ConclusionThe findings indicate that Iranian surgeons do not routinely perform BCS as the first and the best treatment modality. Further research is recommended to evaluate patients' outcomes after BCS treatment in Iran, with regard to available radiotherapy facilities and cultural factors (patients' compliance).

The influence of black race and socioeconomic status on the use of breast-conserving surgery for medicare beneficiaries

This study explores the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) and black race on the use of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as opposed to mastectomy for early stage breast carcinoma. A cohort of 41,937 female Medicare inpatients age 65-79 years who had undergone BCS or mastectomy treatment in 1990 for local or regional breast carcinoma was studied. SES was estimated based on the patients' zip code of residence. Greater use of BCS was associated with higher income and increased education as determined by the patients' zip code area (P < 0.001 for each), and with lower vacant housing rates and fewer persons living below the poverty line in the patients' zip code area (P < 0.001 for each). Black women were less likely than women of other races to undergo BCS (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.91). However, in a multivariate regression model adjusting for stage and urban versus rural residence, income, educational status, and poverty rate remained significant predictors of patient receipt of BCS, whereas black race did not remain an independent predictor of this treatment. Women residing in higher SES areas are more likely to undergo BCS. The reduced use of BCS in black women appears attributable to SES.

The influence of black race and socioeconomic status on the use of breast‐conserving surgery for medicare beneficiaries

BACKGROUND This study explores the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) and black race on the use of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as opposed to mastectomy for early stage breast carcinoma. METHODS A cohort of 41,937 female Medicare inpatients age 65-79 years who had undergone BCS or mastectomy treatment in 1990 for local or regional breast carcinoma was studied. SES was estimated based on the patients' zip code of residence. RESULTS Greater use of BCS was associated with higher income and increased education as determined by the patients' zip code area (P < 0.001 for each), and with lower vacant housing rates and fewer persons living below the poverty line in the patients' zip code area (P < 0.001 for each). Black women were less likely than women of other races to undergo BCS (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.91). However, in a multivariate regression model adjusting for stage and urban versus rural residence, income, educational status, and poverty rate remained significant predictors of patient receipt of BCS, whereas black race did not remain an independent predictor of this treatment. CONCLUSIONS Women residing in higher SES areas are more likely to undergo BCS. The reduced use of BCS in black women appears attributable to SES. Cancer 1997; 79:314-9. © 1997 American Cancer Society.