Treatment Of Aortic Arch Pathologies Research Articles

Branch Thrombus after Endovascular Treatment with Arch Branched Devices for Aortic Arch Pathologies

The aim of this study was to describe the occurrence of branch thrombosis following endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathology using an arch branched device (ABD) and to determine whether this is influenced by clinical and geometric parameters. In this retrospective observational study of patients treated with an ABD in three centres, the primary endpoint was thrombus formation within a branch during follow up. Secondary endpoints were technical success, serious adverse events (SAEs), early and late death, stroke, and re-interventions. Geometric measurements (tortuosity index and curvature) were determined on pre-operative and post-operative computed tomography angiographies. Thirty nine patients were treated and 68 antegrade branches were analysed (innominate artery, n = 27; common carotid artery [CCA], n = 40; left subclavian artery [LSA], n = 1). Thrombus was identified within seven branches (10%) on surveillance imaging (innominate artery, n = 6; CCA, n = 1; LSA, n = 0; p = .021) and was associated with a wider distal bridging stent diameter (median 14.0 mm [interquartile range {IQR} 2.0] vs. 8.7 mm [IQR 5.9]; p = .026), a higher degree of reversed tapering (4.3 mm [IQR 1.4] vs. 1.2 mm [IQR 2.8]; p = .023), use of polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron) covered (vs. expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) bridging stents (23% vs. 2%; p = .011), and higher body mass index (BMI) (32.1 kg/m2 [IQR 7.5] vs. 25.7 kg/m2 [IQR 5.4]; p = .029), but not with pre-operative or post-operative tortuosity index or curvature or alterations. Regarding secondary outcomes, the technical success rate was 97%, SAEs occurred in 15 patients (38%), early and late death rates were 8% and 23%, respectively, and early and late stroke rates were 5% and 23%, respectively. The risk of developing branch thrombosis after endovascular intervention with an ABD is considerable, especially of innominate artery branches, characterised by Dacron covered large diameter bridging stents, and in patients with a high BMI. Large prospective studies are required to analyse factors associated with branch thrombosis.

Current techniques of repair of aortic arch pathologies and the role of the aortic team.

The treatment of aortic arch pathologies is becoming progressively more complex and multidisciplinary. Despite progresses in open surgical techniques, the high rate of surgical morbidity and mortality, especially in frail and elderly patients, has led to the development of alternative treatment options to conventional open surgery such as hybrid and endovascular procedures. Our purpose is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches and investigate the role of a dedicated aortic team in the choice of the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

An early single-center experience with the Relay double inner-branch arch endograft.

Open surgery remains the gold standard technique for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies, although endovascular techniques offer a new opportunity for patients deemed unfit for open repair. This paper assesses the early outcomes of patients treated with a double inner-branched arch endograft in a single, tertiary-care institution. All consecutive cases of elective endovascular arch repair from 2016 to 2022 were included in a prospective database. All procedures were performed using the custom-made Relay® (Terumo Aortic-Bolton Medical Inc., Sunrise, FL, USA) double inner-branched endograft; an extra-anatomical bypass was associated in all cases to preserve the patency of supra-aortic trunks. Comorbidities, periprocedural data, immediate results and follow-up complications were analyzed. Twelve patients were treated during the study period [mean age 74±7 years, 100% male, 58% American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk ≥3]. Treated conditions included aneurysms (n=9), one pseudoaneurysm, one aortic ulcer and a type IA endoleak. The technical success rate was 100%. Early complications included respiratory insufficiency (n=3; 25%), stroke (n=1; 8.3%), acute coronary syndrome needing coronary stenting (n=1; 8.3%), and one perioperative death (n=1; 8.3%) secondary to an intracranial bleeding after coronary stenting. One patient required early reintervention due to retroperitoneal iliac access bleeding (n=1; 8.3%). During a median follow-up of 15.5 (range, 0-44) months, four patients suffered neurological events (two of them of cardioembolic origin), one reintervention was needed (subclavian anastomosis pseudoaneurysm), and a type IB endoleak was diagnosed. Overall mortality was of 17% (n=2), with an 83% overall survival at 2 years. The aortic-related death-free survival was 100%. Endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathology is feasible and shows promising early mortality and stroke rates in high-risk candidates. The main short and midterm goal should be minimizing neurological complications. A longer follow-up is mandatory to determine the effectiveness of the technique and to detect device related complications.

Safety and Efficacy of Inner Branched Stent-Graft in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease: A Systematic Review.

To provide a descriptive overview on the contemporary outcomes of thoracic endovascular arch repair with inner branched endoprosthesis (bTEVAR) for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Pre-defined search terms were used to interrogate PubMed and OVID Medline databases from January 1999 to July 2022. Patient characteristics, indication for treatment, procedural data, mortality rates, postoperative complications, and reintervention rate during follow-up were evaluated. Nineteen articles were included, encompassing a total of 618 patients who received bTEVAR, most of which were double-branched (63.9%, n=395). The main indication for treatment was aneurysm secondary to chronic aortic dissection (38.8%, n=240/618) with a mean maximum diameter of 58.3±11.4 mm. Pooled mean technical success rate was 97.4±4.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=95.1%-99.5%); 2 and 3 patients required conversion to chimney technique and open repair, respectively. Among the pooled rates of early complications, postoperative stroke was the highest (10.5%; 95% CI=6.8%-14.3%). Thirty-day and in-hospital mortality rate was 5.5% (95% CI=2.6%-9.7%). Forty patients (6.5%; 95% CI=2.5%-9.5%) required early reintervention. During a mean follow-up of 20.7±13.5 months, the mortality rate was 18.2% (n=108/593; 95% CI=8.6%-20.6%) where 12 (11.1%) were aortic-related. Pooled late reintervention rate was 9.6% (95% CI=4.8%-14.3%). Comparison of demographics and outcomes found no significant difference between single and double bTEVAR. Branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a promising approach for aortic arch pathologies with a high technical success rate despite a steep learning curve. However, contemporary outcomes reflect that postoperative stroke remains the predominant concern. Further experience and long-term follow-up are required to sufficiently elucidate the safety and durability of bTEVAR in the management of aortic pathologies for high-risk patients. This systematic review summarized the contemporary outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with different inner branched stent-grafts for the management of aortic arch pathologies. Pooled results from nineteen studies with 618 patients demonstrated a high technical success rate and an acceptable mortality rate. However, postoperative stroke remains the major concern. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate its durability.

Incidence and Prognostic Associations of Early Postoperative Stroke and Death Among Patients Undergoing Inner Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the incidences and associations of early postoperative stroke and death among patients undergoing inner branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of arch pathologies. Electronic bibliographic sources (PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were searched up to February 2022 using a combination of thesaurus and free-text terms to identify the studies using branched TEVAR to treat aortic arch disease. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All observational studies investigating the prognosis of inner branched TEVAR in the treatment of aortic arch pathologies were included. Independent extraction of articles was performed by two authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indications. All pooled analyses were based on a random-effects or fixed model according to the heterogeneity. A total of 23 case series totaling 532 participants were included after screening. After optimized selection (largest sample size, most detailed data, lowest risk of bias) from the overlapping data, 12 studies with 289 participants were included in data synthesis. The pooled incidence of 30-day postoperative stroke was 10.6% (95% CI 7.0%-14.2%; p=.41, I2=3%). Pooled 30-day mortality was 4.9% (95% CI 2.0%-7.8%; p=.38, I2=7%). Combined early stroke/death was 15.7% (95% CI 11.2%-20.3%; p=.30, I2=15%). Subgroup analyses of 11 studies (without data missing) showed that a higher incidence of 30-day postoperative stroke was found in studies with aged participants (age≥71.3 years, p=.010), the higher percentage of COPD (≥30%, p= .011) and non-dissection-related pathologies (≥60.8%, p=.011). The higher 30-day postoperative mortality was found in studies with a high percentage of previous coronary artery disease (≥34.5%, p=.023). This review demonstrated that there were acceptable rates of 30-day postoperative stroke and death among patients undergoing inner branched TEVAR. It is strongly necessary to perform a rigorous risk assessment of aortic plaque embolism and coronary artery disease when the surgical plan of the inner branched TEVAR is determined. Treatment arch pathologies with inner branched TEVAR provides acceptable early stroke rate and mortality. Aortic pathology mainly influenced the early stroke rate, and early recognizing high-risk patients for aortic plaque embolism is of supreme importance for reducing the early stroke rate. In addition, the history of coronary artery disease was strongly associated with early mortality, and attention should be paid to the coronary artery assessment and perioperative management of these patients.

Early Experience With the Bentley BeGraft Aortic Stent for the Management of Aortic Arch Pathology in the Paediatric Population.

Aortic arch pathology in older children is often treated preferentially with stenting. Both bare metal and covered stents have been utilised, with potential advantages of covered stents. The search for the ideal covered stent continues. Retrospective review of all paediatric patients undergoing treatment of aortic arch pathology utilising the Bentley BeGraft Aortic stent (BeGraft Aortic, Bentley InnoMed, Hechingen, Germany) from June 2017 to May 2021. Outcome measures were procedural success, complications, medium-term patency and need for re-intervention. Fourteen (14) stents were placed in 12 children (seven males). Indications were coarctation of the aorta in 10 and aneurysm in two. Median age was 11.8 years (8.7-16.6 years) and median weight 42.5 kg (24.8-84 kg). Median coarctation narrowing of 4 mm (range 1-9 mm), improved to 11 mm (range 9-15 mm). The median coarctation gradient improved from 32 mmHg (range 11-42 mmHg) to 7 mmHg (range 0-14 mmHg). Both aneurysms were successfully occluded. There was no mortality or major morbidity. In one patient balloon rupture occurred requiring a second balloon for full inflation and one patient had a minor access site bleed. Follow-up median was 28 months (range 13-65 months). One patient underwent repeat balloon dilation for increased blood pressure gradient at 47 months post implant and a second patient additional stent insertion for a mid-stent aneurysm at 65 months. The Bentley BeGraft Aortic stent can be safely deployed in children for the treatment of aortic arch pathology. Medium-term patency is acceptable. Longer term follow-up in larger series will be required to assess stent performance.

Technical tips and clinical experience with the Nexus Endospan arch branch stent-graft

Aortic arch pathologies are commonly treated by open surgery which is still the gold standard. Patients that are unfit for surgery can be effectively treated mini-invasively with novel endovascular endograft specifically designed for the arch. Endovascular technology has remarkably improved in recent years and is a valid alternative option for the treatment of aortic arch. Available endografts on the market include fenestrated and branched (single, double, or triple). Most endograft designed for the aortic arch are custom-made and production time could be limiting. The aim of this study is to report our experience with the only single branch bi-modular off-the shelf device available on the market specifically designed for aortic arch aneurysms and dissections. We perform endovascular treatment of the arch in a multidisciplinary team together with dedicated anesthesiologist team, interventional cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons. Prior to the implantation of the endograft, a debranching procedure must be made to redirect the blood from brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) to the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery. A through and through system from the right axillary artery to the femoral artery is required to deploy the main module. The ascending module is delivered over an extra stiff guidewire placed in the left ventricle. Molding of the endografts is performed with kissing balloon in rapid pacing. We performed 8 cases. Six of them came to our attention for residual dissection and has already been treated with ascending aorta replacement. Mean aortic diameter was 63 mm. All patients required complete debranching of the supra-aortic vessel and received a right common carotid -left subclavian artery bypass with reimplantation of the left common carotid artery on the graft. Timing of the debranching was a few days before the endovascular procedure in 76% of cases. Technical success of the endovascular intervention occurred in 100% of cases. In 2 cases the target supra-aortic trunk for the deployment of the main module BCT branch was the left subclavian artery with no adverse event related to this variation. No intraoperative adjunctive maneuvers have been registered, left subclavian artery have been embolized during the procedure in 5 cases. No access complications have been reported. We experienced 1 case of major stroke with permanent neurological impairments that lead to worsening of clinical condition and death at 6 months. No cardiological adverse event have been registered. Two cases of type 2 endoleak have been reported and required reintervention with embolization of the LSA. At 1 year follow-up no aorta-related adverse event has been reported. The use of this off-the-shelf device for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies requiring total debranching of the supra-aortic vessels seems to be safe and effective. Preliminary results are promising despite available data are insufficient and further data collection is mandatory.

Analysis of Postoperative Remodeling Characteristics after Modular Inner Branched Stent-Graft Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

The modular inner branched stent-graft (MIBSG), a novel interventional therapy, has demonstrated good effects in the endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies, especially those involving the supra-aortic branches. Nevertheless, the long-term efficacy of the MIBSG and in-depth quantitative evaluation of postoperative outcomes remain to be examined. Moreover, the regularity of postoperative vascular remodeling induced by MIBSG implantation has yet to be explored. To address these questions, we constructed four models (normal, preoperative, 1 week postoperative, and 6 months postoperative) based on a single patient case to perform computational fluid dynamics simulations. The morphological and hemodynamic characteristics, including the velocity profile, flow rate distribution, and hemodynamic parameter distribution (wall shear stress and its derivative parameters), were investigated. After MIBSG implantation, the morphology of the supra-aortic branches changed significantly, and the branch point moved forward to the proximal ascending aorta. Moreover, the curvature radius of the aortic arch axis continued to change. These changes in morphology altered the characteristics of the flow field and wall shear stress distribution. As a result, the local forces exerted on the vessel wall by the blood led to vessel remodeling. This study provides insight into the vascular remodeling process after MIBSG implantation, which occurs as a result of the interplay between vascular morphological characteristics and blood flow characteristics.

(s)INE: (soft-graft)-induced new entry tear after elephant trunk procedure

Elephant trunk and frozen elephant trunk are established procedures for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies, such as aneurysm or dissection. The aim of open surgery is to re-expand the true lumen, favouring correct organ perfusion and the thrombosis of the false lumen. Frozen elephant trunk, with its stented endovascular portion, is sometimes associated with a life-threatening complication: the stent graft-induced new entry. In the literature, many studies reported the incidence of such issue after thoracic endovascular prosthesis or frozen elephant trunk, but in our knowledge, there are no case studies about the occurrence of stent graft-induced new entry with the use of soft grafts. For this reason, we decided to report our experience, highlighting how the use of a Dacron graft can cause distal intimal tears. We decided to coin the term soft-graft-induced new entry to indicate the development of an intimal tear induced by the soft prosthesis in the arch and proximal descending aorta.

Optimal temperature management in aortic arch surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

New temperature management concepts of moderate and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest during aortic arch surgery have gained weight over profound cooling. Comparisons of all temperature levels have rarely been performed. We performed direct and indirect comparisons of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) (≤20°C), moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) (20.1-25°C), and mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (mild HCA) (≥25.1°C) in a network meta-analysis. The literature was systematically searched for all papers published through February 2022 reporting on clinical outcomes after aortic arch surgery utilizing DHCA, MHCA and mild HCA. The primary outcome was operative mortality. The secondary outcomes were postoperative stroke and acute kidney failure (AKI). A total of 34 studies were included, with a total of 12,370 patients. DHCA was associated with significantly higher postoperative incidence of stroke when compared with MHCA (odds ratio [OR], 1.46, 95% confidence interval[CI], 1.19-1.78) and mild HCA: (OR, 1.50, 95% CI, 1.14-1.98). Furthermore, DHCA and MHCA were associated with higher operative mortality when compared with mild HCA (OR 1.71, 95% CI, 1.23-2.39 and OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.12-2.00, respectively). Separate analysis of randomized and propensity score matched studies showed sustained increased risk of stroke with DHCA in contrast to MHCA and mild HCA (OR, 1.61, 95% CI, 1.18-2.20, pvalue = .0029 and OR, 1.74, 95% CI, 1.09-2.77, pvalue = .019). In the included studies, the moderate to mild hypothermia strategies were associated with decreased operative mortality and the risk of postoperative stroke. Large-scale prospective studies are warranted to further explore appropriate temperature management for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies.

Chimney Stenting Versus Surgical Debranching for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies—A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Endovascular repair of aortic arch lesions requires revascularization of epiaortic vessels in case of coverage. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgical bypass versus endovascular reconstruction with a chimney graft. A retrospective analysis of a multicenter register between January 2005 and December 2019 was performed. A total of 127 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: thoracic endovascular aortic repair+surgical debranching (n=72) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair+chimney stenting (n=55). The main end points were major neurologic sequelae and type IA endoleak. Propensity score matching was performed to analyse baseline variables related to these outcomes. The mean follow-up was 35.6months for the debranching group and 34.1 for the chimney group (P=0.65). The incidence of stroke was higher in the chimney group although not statistically significant (7.3% vs. 4.1%; P=0.46); for both groups, a wide angle between the ostium of the target vessel and the aorta and landing in Ishimaru Zone 0 was found to be the main predictors for major neurologic sequelae (P=0.002 and P=0.003, respectively). During follow-up, 9 (12.5%) type IA endoleaks occurred in the debranching group and 12 (21.8%) in the chimney group (P=0.14). Aortic diameter larger than 66mm and arch angle >46° had a strong association with proximal endoleak incidence (P=0.001 and P=0.011, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: Surgical debranching showed better results than chimney stenting in terms of major neurologic events incidence and type IA endoleak, although the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to establish the indications for these procedures.

Endovascular surgery for thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch.

BackgroundAortic arch pathologies are serious clinical conditions associated with a very dismal prognosis. Traditional open surgery has a high mortality and is not suitable for critically ill patients. Recently years, endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta has made rapid progress and has been gradually applied to the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, maintaining cerebral blood flow during endovascular treatment of aortic arch lesions remains a challenge at this time. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch, and to present initial experience with this technique.MethodsFrom October 2016 to December 2020, patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the proximal landing zone of the stent-graft in the aortic arch at Ishimaru zones 0–1, in which cerebral flow needs to be maintained during surgery, and the supra-aortic branches were reconstruction with either in situ fenestration or the chimney technique.ResultsA total of 62 cases with lesions involving the arch were treated with endovascular surgery. Total supra-aortic branches reconstruction was successfully performed in 51 cases, the left carotid artery (LCA) and the innominate artery reconstruction were performed in eight cases, the left subclavian artery (LSA) and the LCA were reconstructed in three patients. Among them, the in situ fenestration or chimney repair technique for the LSA was successful performed in 42 and 12 cases. However, in 20 patients, attempts to reconstruction the LSA using the fenestration technique were unsuccessful due to tortuous and angulated vessels. Early mortality was 6.45%. No neurological complications related to surgery occurred. Computer tomography images at post-operative follow-up (mean 3.51 months) confirmed patency of all branch stents without any signs of endoleaks, migration, conversion to retrograde dissection or receive open-heart surgery.ConclusionThe endovascular technique is an effective, feasible, safe and repeatable method to reconstruct the aortic arch, which allows for the reconstruction of the supra-aortic branches.

Outcomes of Zone 1 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With Fenestrated Surgeon-Modified Stent-Graft for Aortic Arch Pathologies

Objectives: This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of zone 1 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with fenestrated surgeon-modified stent-graft (SMSG) for aortic arch pathologies. Methods: Between March 2016 and November 2020, 34 consecutive patients underwent zone 1 TEVAR with fenestrated SMSG for aortic arch pathologies. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative, and follow-up morbidity and mortality. Results: During the study period, 34 patients were treated with zone 1 TEVAR with fenestrated SMSG. Twenty-four (70.6%) patients presented with type B aortic dissections, 9 (26.5%) patients presented with aneurysms (7 located on the lesser curvature side of aortic arch), 1 (2.9%) patient presented with type Ia endoleak after previous TEVAR owing to traumatic aortic dissection. The proximal landing zone for all patients were in zone 1, and all supra-aortic trunks were reconstructed, except for one left subclavian artery. Technical success was achieved in all cases. The 30-day estimated survival (±SE) was 90.9% ± 5.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77.0%–97.0%]. The 30-day estimated freedom from reintervention (±SE) was 87.9% ± 5.7% (95% CI: 73.4%–95.3%). At a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 12–68 months), 2 patients died, including 1 aortic-related death and 1 non-aortic-related death. One patient had reintervention 13 months after the operation owing to type Ia endoleak. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. The estimated survival (±SE) during follow-up was 85.1% ± 6.2% (95% CI: 69.9%–93.6%). One (2.7%) patient had stroke. The estimated freedom from reintervention (±SE) during follow-up was 84.2% ± 6.5% (95% CI: 69.9%–93.5%). Conclusions: Zone 1 TEVAR with fenestrated SMSG is an alternate option for treatment of aortic arch pathologies in experienced centers.

Mid-term Comparison of One-Piece Branched Stent-Graft and Chimney Technique Treating Aortic Arch Pathologies.

We compared the mid-term outcomes of a one-piece branched stent-graft with the chimney technique in the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. Between August 2012 and December 2017, a retrospective analysis of 279 patients with thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) or aneurysm (TAA) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with b-TEVAR (n = 69, 58 TAD and 11 TAA) or c-TEVAR (n = 210, 151 TAD and 59 TAA) was performed. Forty-five double-chimney for the left subclavian artery (LSA) and left common carotid artery LCCA and 165 single-chimney for the LSA were performed in chimney-TEVAR (c-TEVAR) and 69 branched-TEVAR (b-TEVAR) with 36 single-branched stent-grafts and 33 branched stent-grafts combined with fenestration technique. The c-TEVAR group experienced more in-hospital complications than the b-TEVAR group (19.5 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.017), primarily because the c-TEVAR group experienced more in-hospital cerebral ischemia events (6.2 vs. 0%, p = 0.043) and intra-operative type I endoleaks (31.9 vs. 5.8%, p < 0.01). There were significantly more follow-up type I endoleaks (21.9 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.002), cerebral ischemia events (11.0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.042), and re-interventions (12.9 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.048) in the c-TEVAR group than in the b-TEVAR group. However, follow-up mortality was not significantly different between the c-TEVAR and b-TEVAR groups (5.2 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.638). In patients with aortic pathologies involving the arch branches, customized b-TEVAR may result in fewer cerebral ischemia events and endoleaks than c-TEVAR. However, c-TEVAR should be considered an off-the-shelf treatment option for patients in need of emergency treatment. Level 4, Case Series.

Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair: From Dream to Reality.

The gold-standard therapy for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies is conventional open surgery. Recently, total endovascular aortic arch replacement with branched stent-grafts has been introduced into clinical practice with the aim of reducing invasiveness especially in selected high-risk patients. The aim of this review is to describe the two most commonly used branched devices for endovascular arch stent-grafting: Nexus (Endospan, Herzlia, Israle) and RelayBranch (Terumo Aortic, Glasgow, United Kingdom). Nexus is a CE-certified off-the-shelf, single branch, double stent graft system. It consists of two different components: a main module for the aortic arch and the descending aorta with a side-branch for the brachiocephalic artery (BCA), and a curved module for the ascending aorta that lands into the sino-tubular junction and connects to the main module through a side-facing self-protecting sleeve. Nexus may be used in urgent-emergency cases and also in patients with only one suitable supra-aortic target vessel but, on the other hand, it makes cerebral blood flow dependent on one source vessel only. The RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-Graft System is a custom made, double branched endograft with a wide window on its superior portion to accommodate two inner tunnels for BCA and left common carotid artery connection; bilateral cervical accesses are generally used to advance guidewires for catheterization of the inner tunnels in a retrograde fashion. RelayBranch can be customized on every patient’s specific anatomy and provides a double blood source for the brain, but it cannot be used in urgent-emergency conditions. Therefore, in order to optimize outcomes, the choice of the most appropriate device should be made considering pros and cons of each system and patient’s anatomy by an experienced aortic team. In conclusion, total endovascular aortic arch exclusion is a promising reality in selected high-risk patients.

Tratamiento endovascular del arco aórtico con la prótesis NEXUS™: experiencia inicial de un centro

Introduction and objectivesThe treatment of aortic arch pathology is highly complex. Most of the open techniques are performed with circulatory arrest, and consequently there are patients who, due to their comorbidities, are not candidates for this approach. Recently, the endovascular treatment of the arch has opened a therapeutic window for them. The NEXUS™ prosthesis (Endospan Ltd/Jotec GmbH) is developed to cover the aortic arch. This article presents the initial experience at our center. MethodsBetween August 2020 and July 2021 two patients were treated with the NEXUS™ prosthesis in our center. Retrospectively, the technical and postoperative results, as well as the clinical and radiological follow-up, were collected in accordance with the current reporting standards. ResultsWe performed the intervention in two surgical stages, using the first for the debranching of the supraaortic trunks, and the second to implant the NEXUS™ device from zone 0B to zone 4 of the aorta.No patient presented temporary or permanent neurological deficits. They also did not present complications of vascular access or postoperative bleeding. In the postoperative control and follow-up CT we did not observe type I or III endoleaks. Follow-up is 14.7 and 3.3 months. ConclusionsThe results of endovascular aortic arch repair with the NEXUS™ System with respect to technical success are promising. In our experience, we did not find in-hospital complications. To obtain more robust results we need a larger sample volume and carry out a more extensive follow-up.

Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Pathologies with Surgeon Modified Fenestrated Stent Grafts: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

To evaluate the outcome of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch pathologies with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts. A multicentre, retrospective study consisting of consecutive patients from seven centres treated with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts for aortic arch pathologies was conducted. A technique to align fenestrations and supra-aortic vessels was applied. Rates of technical success, mortality, complications, and re-interventions were evaluated. Between February 2016 and January 2020, 513 consecutive patients with aortic arch pathologies received TEVAR with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts. The technical success rate was 98.6% (n = 506). In total, 626 fenestrations were created to revascularise 684 branch arteries of the aortic arch. There were 13 deaths and 15 re-interventions within 30 days of the operation. The estimated clinical success rate at 30 days was 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.4 – 96.4), the estimated survival at 30 days was 97.5% (95% CI 96.1 – 98.9), and the estimated freedom from re-intervention at 30 days was 97.1% (95% CI 95.7 – 98.5). The median follow up was 27 (interquartile range 13 – 31) months. During follow up, there were five aortic related deaths, three non-aortic related deaths, and four deaths of unknown cause. Eighteen patients underwent re-intervention. The estimated clinical success rate at 24 months was 88.2% (95% CI 85.5 – 91.0), the estimated survival at 24 months was 94.9% (95% CI 92.7 – 97.1), and the estimated freedom from re-intervention at 24 months was 93.1% (95% CI 91.0 – 95.3). In total, 18 cases of stroke were recorded, including 12 within 30 days and six during follow up; six cases of retrograde type A aortic dissection were recorded, including five within 30 days and one during the follow up. TEVAR with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies provides acceptable outcomes. Further follow up is required to confirm the benefits of this approach.

Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Pathologies with Surgeon Modified Fenestrated Stent Grafts: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

To evaluate the outcome of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch pathologies with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts. A multicentre, retrospective study consisting of consecutive patients from seven centres treated with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts for aortic arch pathologies was conducted. A technique to align fenestrations and supra-aortic vessels was applied. Rates of technical success, mortality, complications, and re-interventions were evaluated. Between February 2016 and January 2020, 513 consecutive patients with aortic arch pathologies received TEVAR with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts. The technical success rate was 98.6% (n= 506). In total, 626 fenestrations were created to revascularise 684 branch arteries of the aortic arch. There were 13 deaths and 15 re-interventions within 30 days of the operation. The estimated clinical success rate at 30 days was 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.4 - 96.4), the estimated survival at 30 days was 97.5% (95% CI 96.1 - 98.9), and the estimated freedom from re-intervention at 30 days was 97.1% (95% CI 95.7 - 98.5). The median follow up was 27 (interquartile range 13 - 31) months. During follow up, there were five aortic related deaths, three non-aortic related deaths, and four deaths of unknown cause. Eighteen patients underwent re-intervention. The estimated clinical success rate at 24 months was 88.2% (95% CI 85.5 - 91.0), the estimated survival at 24 months was 94.9% (95% CI 92.7 - 97.1), and the estimated freedom from re-intervention at 24 months was 93.1% (95% CI 91.0 - 95.3). In total, 18 cases of stroke were recorded, including 12 within 30 days and six during follow up; six cases of retrograde type A aortic dissection were recorded, including five within 30 days and one during the follow up. TEVAR with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies provides acceptable outcomes. Further follow up is required to confirm the benefits of this approach.

Zone 0 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With Chimney Grafts: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Open aortic repair has been the reference standard treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, endovascular or hybrid therapies have become available for patients deemed at high risk of open surgical reconstruction. Surgical debranching still carries high morbidity and mortality in debilitated patients. Branch devices are currently limited in availability to phase I sites or for compassionate use, which can still cause significant delays in the delivery of the graft to the patient. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with parallel stent-grafting to maintain supra-aortic branch perfusion has been described as a feasible option for high-risk patients requiring urgent repair. We present the case of a symptomatic aortic arch aneurysm (Fig 1) requiring urgent repair in the setting of severe cardiac and pulmonary disease prohibiting open aortic arch reconstruction or debranching. The patient also had challenging vascular access with small, heavily calcified iliac arteries. We also reviewed the most current literature on endovascular therapy for aortic arch pathology. The patient underwent iliac artery endoconduit creation with a 10-mm Gore Viabahn (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz). She underwent successful repair of her aortic arch aneurysm with zone 0 TEVAR, chimney grafts to the innominate (10-mm × 79-mm Gore Viabahn balloon-expandable endoprosthesis [VBX] and 10-mm × 59-mm VBX) and left carotid (7-mm × 79-mm VBX and 7-mm × 59-mm VBX) arteries, and left carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass. She experienced resolution of her chest pain, and postoperative imaging demonstrated successful exclusion of the aortic arch aneurysm (Fig 2). Endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysms can be safely performed in select patients who are not candidates for traditional aortic arch repair with zone 0 TEVAR and parallel stent-grafting to supra-aortic branch vessels.Fig 2Postoperative images showing successful exclusion of the aortic arch aneurysm with zone 0 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and chimney grafts (A and B) to the innominate artery and left common carotid artery (white arrows). C, Three-dimensional reconstruction. D, Completion aortogram.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair with Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated Stent-Grafts on Zone 0 Landing for Aortic Arch Pathologies

Objectives This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft on zone 0 landing for aortic arch pathologies. Methods Between June 2016 and October 2019, 37 consecutive patients underwent total endovascular arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts on zone 0 landing. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, and branch artery patency. Results During the study period, 37 patients were treated with total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft. Twenty-one (56.8%) patients were diagnosed with aortic dissections, 15 (40.5%) patients with aneurysms, and 1 (2.7%) patient required reintervention due to endoleak and sac expansion from previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysm. The proximal landing zone for all patients were in zone 0, and all branch arteries of aortic arch were reconstructed. Technical success was achieved in 34 cases (91.9%). Three (8.1%) patients had fenestrations misaligned with target arteries, and the chimney technique was applied as a complementary measure. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5.4% (n=2). Thirty-day stroke rate was 5.4% (n=2). Thirty-day reintervention rate was 2.7% (n=1). At a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 3–49 months), 5 (13.5%) patients died, including 2 aortic-related deaths, 1 nonaortic-related death, and 2 deaths of unknown reason. One (2.7%) patient had stroke. Four patients (10.8%) had reintervention during the follow-up, including 2 cases of left subclavian artery occlusion and 2 cases of type II endoleak. The estimated survival (±SE) at 2 years was 72.4%±9.7% (95% CI 53.4%–91.4%). The estimated freedom from reintervention (±SE) at 2 years was 87.4%±5.9% (95% CI 75.84%–98.96%). Conclusions Total endovascular aortic arch repair with surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-grafts on zone 0 landing is an alternate option for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies in experienced centers.