Treatment Of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease Research Articles

The MAGIC algorithm probability predicts treatment response and long-term outcomes to second-line therapy for acute GVHD

AbstractThe significance of biomarkers in second-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has not been well characterized. We analyzed clinical data and serum samples at the initiation of second-line systemic treatment of acute GVHD from 167 patients from 17 centers of the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) between 2016 and 2021. Sixty-two patients received ruxolitinib-based therapy, whereas 102 received other systemic agents. In agreement with prospective trials, ruxolitinib resulted in a higher day 28 (D28) overall response Frate than nonruxolitinib therapies (55% vs 31%, P = .003) and patients who received ruxolitinib had significantly lower nonrelapse mortality (NRM) than those who received nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 35% vs 61%, P = .002). Biomarker analyses demonstrated that the benefit from ruxolitinib was observed only in patients with low MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) at the start of second-line treatment. Among patients with a low MAP, those who received ruxolitinib experienced significantly lower NRM than those who received nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 12% vs 41%, P = .016). However, patients with high MAP experienced high NRM regardless of treatment with ruxolitinib or nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 67% vs 80%, P = .65). A landmark analysis demonstrated that the relationship between the D28 response and NRM largely depends on the MAP level at the initiation of second-line therapy. In conclusion, MAP measured at second-line systemic treatment for acute GVHD predicts treatment response and NRM. The outcomes of patients with high MAP are poor regardless of treatment choice, and ruxolitinib appears to primarily benefit patients with low MAP.

A Day 14 Endpoint for Acute GVHD Clinical Trials

The overall response rate (ORR) 28 days after treatment has been adopted as the primary endpoint for clinical trials of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, physicians often need to modify immunosuppression earlier than day (D) 28, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) does not always correlate with ORR at D28. We studied 1144 patients that received systemic treatment for GVHD in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) and divided them into a training set (n=764) and a validation set (n=380). We used a recursive partitioning algorithm to create a Mount Sinai model that classifies patients into favorable or unfavorable groups that predicted 12 month NRM according to overall GVHD grade at both onset and D14. In the Mount Sinai model grade II GVHD at D14 was unfavorable for grade III/IV GVHD at onset and predicted NRM as well as the D28 standard response model. The MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) is a validated score that combines the serum concentrations of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) and regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha (REG3α) to predict NRM. Inclusion of the D14 MAP biomarker score with the D14 Mount Sinai model created three distinct groups (good, intermediate, poor) with strikingly different NRM (8%, 35%, 76% respectively). This D14 MAGIC model displayed better AUC, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value, and net benefit in decision curve analysis compared to the D28 standard response model. We conclude that this D14 MAGIC model could be useful in therapeutic decisions and may offer an improved endpoint for clinical trials of acute GVHD treatment.

Placenta-Derived Decidua Stromal Cells: A New Frontier in the Therapy of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), rare precursors found in all body tissues, possess immunosuppressive properties and can inhibit alloreactivity both in vitro and in vivo. Two decades ago, we introduced bone marrow-derived (BM) MSCs as a novel therapy for acute GVHD. While some patients responded to BM-MSCs, the response was not universal. Commercially available BM-MSCs are now used for acute GVHD treatment in Canada, Japan, and New Zealand. The fetus is protected from the mother's immune system by the placenta, and our research found that placenta-derived decidua stromal cells (DSCs) offer a stronger immunosuppressive effect than other sources of stromal cells. Safety studies in rabbits, rats, mice, and humans have shown negligible or no side effects from BM-MSCs or DSCs. In a phase I/II trial for severe acute GVHD, we treated 21 patients (median age, 49 years; range 1.6-72 years) with severe biopsy-proven gastrointestinal acute GVHD. The median cell dose of DSCs was 1.2 × 106 (range 0.9-2.9) cells/kg body weight, with a median of 2 (range 1-6) infusions given 1 week apart. The cell viability of DSCs was 93% (range, 69%-100%), and the median cell passage number was 4 (range, 2-4). All patients responded, with a complete response of acute GVHD in 11 patients and partial response in 10 and 1-year survival of 81%. Randomized trials are needed to prove the superiority of DSCs compared to ruxolitinib and/or other novel immunosuppressive therapies.

The MAGIC Algorithm Probability Predicts Long-Term Outcomes and Treatment Response to Second-Line Therapy for Acute Gvhd

Introduction: Risk stratification approaches using clinical criteria or biomarkers in acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have traditionally been implemented at diagnosis or initiation systemic treatment with corticosteroids. For patients who require second-line treatment, the significance of biomarkers at salvage therapy and the relationship between biomarker risk and choice of therapy are unknown. Methods: We studied adult patients who received second-line treatment for acute GVHD between January 2016 and December 2021 in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD Consortium (MAGIC) database, which collects clinical data and longitudinal serum samples from allogeneic HCT recipients using a rigorous PRoBE study design. Exclusion criteria included relapse of underlying malignant disease prior to second-line therapy, missing response data, or missing serum sample. Serum samples collected from 7 days prior to 3 days after initiation of second-line therapy met criteria for biomarker analysis. The MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) was calculated as a single value based on concentrations of ST2 and REG3α and was stratified at a threshold of 0.290 to define high MAP and low MAP groups. The primary objective evaluated the association between MAP and survival for patients receiving second-line therapy for acute GVHD. The key secondary objective was to investigate the MAP and choice of second-line systemic agent on Day 28 overall response rate (ORR) and survival. Results: In total, 316 adult patients received second-line treatment for acute GVHD; 149 patients (47%) were excluded for disease relapse (n=27), missing response data (n=48), or missing sample (n=74).Of the 167 evaluable patients, most had steroid-refractory acute GVHD (n=146, 87%), rather than steroid-dependent (n=8, 5%) or steroid-sensitive (n=14, 8%) disease. 62 patients received ruxolitinib while 102 received other systemic agents (best available therapy: BAT). Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population according to treatment choice were similar, except for donor type (Rux: MRD 15%, MUD 74%, haplo 11%; BAT: MRD 30%, MUD 67%, haplo 3%; P=0.014) and median days from corticosteroids to second-line treatment (Rux: 18, BAT: 12; P=0.02).In total, 81 patients had high MAPs and 86 patients had low MAPs, with similar distribution in each treatment cohort (P=0.53). For the entire cohort, the median follow-up for survivors was 22 months (range, 1.5-27).The MAP separated patients into 2 groups (high vs low) with significantly different mortality (NRM at 2 years, 76% vs 29%, P<.0001) and survival (OS at 2 years, 12% vs 63%, P<.0001). Patients who received ruxolitinib as second-line therapy had lower mortality (NRM at 2 years, 35% vs 60%, P<.002) and improved survival (OS at 2 years, 51% vs 32%, P<.008), compared to those who received other systemic agents. However, the outcomes of patients with high MAP were poor, regardless of second-line treatment choice ( Figure 1A). The MAP (low vs high), time from corticosteroids to second-line treatment (≥14 days vs < 14 days), GVHD grade at second-line (0-2 vs 3-4), and choice of second-line therapy (Rux vs BAT) were all significant (P<0.05) predictors of lower NRM and higher OS in multivariate analysis. The MAP also separated patients into 2 groups with significantly different D28 ORR (low: 49%, high: 30%, P<.0001). In agreement with prospective trials, ruxolitinib resulted in higher D28 response rates compared to other systemic therapies (ORR 54.9% vs 30.5%, P=0.005), which was observed in both low MAP (ORR, 64.5% vs 38.5%, P=0.017) and high MAP cohorts (ORR, 42.9% vs 22.6%, P=0.06) ( Figure 1B). The MAP (low vs high), GVHD grade at second line (0-2 vs 3-4), and choice of second-line therapy (Rux vs BAT) were significant predictors (P<0.05) of higher D28 ORR in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The MAP measured at the initiation of second-line systemic treatment for acute GVHD predicts NRM and OS, as well as treatment response. The outcomes of patients with high MAP are poor, regardless of second-line treatment choice, and the higher CR rate in low MAP patients may drive higher survival rates. Incorporation of MAP into clinical trials in this setting warrants investigation. The results also support the current use of ruxolitinib as second-line treatment for acute GVHD, particularly in patients with low MAP.

Flares of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Mount Sinai Acute Gvhd International Consortium (MAGIC) Study

[Background] The current standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), systemic high-dose steroids, induces clinical responses in a majority of patients. Flares of GVHD after initial improvement often occur during tapering or discontinuation of immunosuppression. There is no consensus regarding the definition of GVHD flare and little has been published regarding its natural history. [Methods] We retrospectively evaluated clinical data and blood samples from 968 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients from 23 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) transplant centers who achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) within 4 weeks of acute GVHD treatment between 2014 and 2021. VGPR was defined as the complete resolution of acute GVHD manifestations except residual stage 1 skin disease. Flares were defined as a recurrence of acute GVHD after achievement of CR/VGPR if (1) patients had an increased symptom severity of at least 1 organ stage; (2) received intensified treatment (increase in steroid dose ≥ 0.25 mg/kg or initiation of additional systemic immunosuppression); and (3) had no prior history of primary disease relapse or donor lymphocyte infusion preceding the flare. Serum samples obtained at the time of CR/VGPR and at the time of flares were analyzed for ST2 and REG3α concentrations that generated MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) resulting in previously validated Ann Arbor (AA) scores (1, 2, and 3). [Results] The median recipient age at HCT was 55 years (range: 0 to 79); 18.6% of patients had grades III-IV acute GVHD before CR/VGPR. The median maximum daily dose of corticosteroids before CR/VGPR was 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone equivalent (range, 0.1 to 3.2 mg/kg). Flares developed within 6 months following CR/VGPR in 210/968 (21.7%) patients with a median onset of 28 days (range: 2 to 448). Symptom severity at the onset of flare symptoms varied widely (grade I: 22%; grade II: 38%; grade III-IV: 41%) and the development of a flare was associated with a five-fold increase in NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 4.84 [95% CI, 3.19-7.36], P < 0.001) when considered as a time-dependent covariate in a multivariate regression model. The large majority of non-relapse deaths after flares (54/71, 76%) were due to acute GVHD or complications from its treatment. The AA scores at the time of first CR/VGPR successfully stratified patients for risk of six-month NRM (AA1: 5%, AA2: 11%, AA3: 34%, P < 0.001) (Figure A). Increasing AA score at CR/VGPR was also associated with significantly increased risk of GVHD flares (Figure B). Not only did the risk of flare increase with each rising AA score, but the number of patients with severe (grade III/IV) symptoms at flare onset also increased (AA1: 34%, AA2: 43%, AA3: 54%). We next generated a multivariate regression model of risk factors for the development of flares. High AA scores at the time of CR/VGPR (AA2: HR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.32-2.48], P = 0.001; AA3: HR, 3.14 [95% CI, 1.98-4.98], P < 0.001), HCT from HLA mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.00-3.02], P = 0.049), and interestingly, rapid achievement of CR/VGPR from the time of initial treatment (≤14 days) (HR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.21-2.80], P = 0.004) were all identified as significant risk factors. Meanwhile, no other transplant, GVHD, or treatment characteristics associated with the development of flares including maximum GVHD severity, maximum steroid dose, and use of additional immunosuppressive agents other than steroids before CR/VGPR. AA scores measured at the onset of flare symptoms in 98 patients also predicted six-month NRM (AA1, 6%; AA2, 19%; AA3 42%, P = 0.01). [Conclusion] Despite advances in treatment, flares of GVHD symptoms following excellent (CR/VGPR) responses still occur in over one fifth of patients in current practice and are associated with a five-fold increase in six-month NRM. AA scores from serum biomarkers predict outcomes despite the absence of symptoms, suggesting that MAGIC biomarkers detect subclinical damage to GI crypts that can drive later recrudescence of clinical GVHD. Measurement of the MAP at the time of response to GVHD treatment may thus help to risk-stratify tapering strategies of immunosuppressive therapy.

Drug exporter expression correlates with group 3 innate lymphoid cell resistance to immunosuppressive agents

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is often complicated by graft versus host disease (GvHD), an alloreactive immune response triggered by tissue damage. Interleukin (IL)-22 producing type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3) protect epithelial tissues against chemo(radio)therapy-induced damage, suppress alloreactive T cells and mitigate acute GvHD symptoms after allogeneic HCT. Relatively high numbers of ILC before and after allogeneic HCT has been associated with significantly reduced tissue damage and less acute GvHD. While most transplantation conditioning and GvHD prophylaxis regimens are aimed at eliminating host and alloreactive donor lymphocytes, the effect of these regimens on ILC remain elusive. Here, we studied the effect of conditioning chemotherapy and immunosuppressive agents on the survival, proliferation, activation and function of human ILC3 in vitro. Tonsil-derived ILC3 were activated and incubated with agents commonly used to prevent and treat GvHD. While fludarabine, rapamycin, mycophenolic acid and prednisolone suppressed ILC3 to a similar degree as T cells, the effect of other agents, including cyclosporine A, methotrexate, imatinib, ibrutinib and ruxolitinib, was milder on ILC3 than on T cells. ILC3 are less sensitive to immunosuppressants potentially because of their expression of functionally active ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B Member 1 (ABCB1) drug exporter proteins. This suggests less intracellular accumulation of immunosuppressive agents, which renders ILC3 resistant to these compounds. The present findings may help to develop strategies to simultaneously maintain the tissue protective properties of ILC3 and at the same time suppress alloreactive lymphocytes, which is important in the prevention and treatment of acute GvHD.

BAFF blockade attenuates acute graft-versus-host disease directly via the dual regulation of T- and B-cell homeostasis.

B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) is associated with donor-specific antibodies and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the effects of BAFF on T-cell physiological function have not been fully elucidated in acute GVHD. We examined the effects of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting BAFF, for the treatment of acute GVHD. We examined the effects of T cells and B cells separately when inducing GVHD in mouse model. Therapeutic functional manipulation of endogenous BAFF can improve acute GVHD during the early post-transplant period. In this study, BAFF was shown to increase the proportions of CD4+IL-17+, CD4+IL-6+ Th17, and CD4+IFN-γ+ Th1 cells and to reduce the proportion of regulatory T (Treg) cells. Furthermore, the belimumab therapy group showed increased B220+IgD+IgM+ mature B cells but decreased B220+IgD-IgM- memory B cells, B220+Fas+GL-7+ germinal center formation, and B220+IgD-CD138+ plasma cells. These results indicate that BAFF can alleviate acute GVHD by simultaneously regulating T and B cells. Interestingly, the BAFF level was higher in patients with acute GVHD after HSCT compared with patients receiving chemotherapy. This study suggests that BAFF blockade might modulate CD4 +T-cell-induced acute GVHD early after allo-HSCT and the possibility of simultaneously controlling chronic GVHD, which may appear later after allo-HSCT.

CD73-Expressing Microbiota-Reactive DP8α Regulatory T Cells Are Lacking in Acute GvHD Patients and Prevent Disease Development in a Pre-Clinical In Vivo Humanized Mouse Model of GvHD

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) to treat hematological malignancies can induce life-threatening complications, such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Steroids remain the first-line treatment for acute GvHD (aGvHD). Nevertheless, new treatments are needed to, not only, treat steroid-resistant patients and improve allo-HSCT outcomes, but also reduce steroid complications. Increasing evidences strongly suggest that gut microbiota composition and the activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs) could be involved in GvHD prevention. We have identified a novel FoxP3-negative IL-10-secreting Treg subset, named DP8α, enriched in the colonic mucosa and present in blood. These cells display a TCR-specificity for the gut ClostridiumIV bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Sizable fractions of these cells also expressed the membrane-bound ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73, which are directly involved in their suppressive activity in vitro. In vivo, these enzymes play key regulatory roles by both degrading proinflammatory extracellular ATP and inducing the production of immunosuppressive adenosine. An alteration in this adenosine/purinergic pathway has also been linked to GvHD occurrence. Altogether, these data prompted us to hypothesize that F. prausnitzii-reactive DP8α Tregs, whose suppressive activity is driven by the purinergic pathway, could bridge microbiota dysbiosis and GvHD incidence in allo-HSCT patients. Moreover, decreased levels of Clostridia, especially Faecalibacteriumspp, in patient's stools, have been associated with aGvHD risk, and mice gavaged with Treg-inducing Clostridia displayed milder GvHD and improved survival. Therefore, we addressed a potential role for DP8α Tregs in the prevention of aGvHD. We first analyzed cells from 63 patients with hematological malignancies, who received allo-HSCT, among whom a third developed aGvHD. We quantified their circulating DP8α Tregs and their CD39 and CD73 expression pre- and post-allo-HSCT. While the percentage of CD73-expressing DP8α Tregs within CD3+ T cells before HSCT was not different, a strikingly deficiency of CD73-expressing DP8α Tregs was strongly associated with aGvHD development (p<.001) at 1-month post-transplant, as compared to aGvHD-free patients (Fig.1). Importantly, CD73 expression was not affected on any other T cell subset analyzed. CD73 decrease on DP8α Tregs did not result from corticotherapy since it was 1/ equally observed before and after treatment in aGvHD patients and 2/ not observed following in vitro treatment of PBMCs with methylprednisolone. Moreover, the decrease of CD73-expressing DP8α Tregs in aGvHD patients was observed across all treatment conditions, which were heterogeneous, and therefore appears relevant and likely related to the aGvHD condition itself. Altogether, these data strongly suggest that a CD73-dependent functional alteration of DP8α Tregs could, at least in part, be involved in aGvHD occurrence and/or development. We next evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of CD73+ DP8α Tregs in a pre-clinical model of acute xeno-GvHD induced through human PBMC injection in irradiated NSG recipient mice. In vitro-expanded CD73+ DP8α Treg injected i.v. drastically protected mice against xeno-GvHD (Log-rank, p<.0001; Fig.2) without preventing the development of human chimerism. Moreover, these in vivo experiments, repeated 4 times using different PBMC donors, all confirmed the potent protective role of CD73+ DP8α Tegs in this model. Accordingly, serum inflammatory human cytokines and tissue infiltration by human cells were significantly lower in mice treated with CD73+ DP8α Tregs, as compared to untreated mice. In addition, the colon was rapidly populated with the injected DP8α Tregs and well-preserved in treated mice, while clearly damaged in untreated mice. Altogether, these results strongly support a role for CD73+ DP8α Tregs in aGVHD prevention and advocate for the use of these cells to both predict aGvHD risks and give rise to the development of innovative therapeutic strategies to preclude GvHD-related inflammation. Such therapeutic approaches would be based on the infusion of DP8α Tregs and/or their in vivo stimulation, e.g., with F. prausnitzii-derived antigens or probiotics. Of note, DP8α Tregs display an uniquely high proliferating potential and stable immunosuppressive functions in vitro, a key feature to implement such therapeutics. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Prediction of outcomes after second-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease

AbstractAcute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) requiring second-line treatment represents a highly morbid complication of allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Recent studies have defined short-term outcomes after second-line treatment for acute GVHD, but longer-term outcomes have not been well defined. We examined overall survival (OS) and failure-free-survival (FFS) of 216 patient who had HCT who received second-line treatment for acute GVHD. Failure time for FFS was defined as the earliest of death, relapse, or implementation of third-line treatment. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for mortality and failure, and predictive models were derived for 6- and 12-month mortality. Point estimates of OS at 6 and 12 months were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52-65) and 52% (95% CI, 45-68), respectively. Point estimates of FFS at 6 and 12 months were 42% (95% CI, 35-48) and 37% (95% CI, 31-43), respectively. Predictive models for both end points included serum albumin and total bilirubin concentrations at the onset of second-line treatment, patient age at onset of second-line therapy, and a combination of abdominal pain/stage 4 gut involvement. Optimism-corrected areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve and Brier scores were 77.4 and 0.169 for 6-month mortality, respectively, and 80.0 and 0.169 for 12-month mortality. We identify risk factors associated with mortality and failure after second-line treatment of acute GVHD, provide historical benchmarks for assessment of FFS and OS in other studies, and propose predictive models for 6- and 12-month mortality that could be used to generate population-specific benchmarks.

Efficacy and safety of itacitinib versus placebo in combination with corticosteroids for initial treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (GRAVITAS-301): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and life-threatening complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); there is an urgent unmet need for effective therapies. We aimed to evaluate the Janus kinase 1 inhibitor itacitinib versus placebo, both in combination with corticosteroids, for initial treatment of acute GVHD. GRAVITAS-301 was an international, double-blind, adaptive (group sequential design) phase 3 study conducted at 129 hospitals and community practices in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had previously received allogeneic HSCT for a haematological malignancy, developed grades II-IV acute GVHD, and received up to 2 days of systemic corticosteroids. Patients were stratified by clinical standard-risk or high-risk acute GVHD and randomly assigned (1:1), via a centralised interactive voice response system, to receive either oral itacitinib (200 mg) or placebo once daily, both in addition to corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28 (defined as the proportion of patients with complete response, very good partial response, or partial response 28 days after the start of treatment). For sample size determination, an absolute improvement in ORR at day 28 over standard therapy of 16% was considered clinically meaningful. Efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population; safety analyses included patients who received at least one dose of study drug. GRAVITAS-301 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03139604) and is complete. Between July 19, 2017, and Oct 3, 2019, 439 patients were randomly assigned to receive either itacitinib plus corticosteroids (n=219; itacitinib group) or placebo plus corticosteroids (n=220; placebo group). 173 (39%) patients were female and 390 (89%) were White. At baseline, 107 (24%) of 439 patients (itacitinib 51 [23%] of 219; placebo 56 [25%] of 220) had clinical high-risk acute GVHD. The ORR at day 28 was 74% (95% CI 67·6-79·7; 162 of 219; complete response 53% [116 of 219]) for itacitinib and 66% (59·7-72·6; 146 of 220; complete response, 40% [89 of 220]) for placebo (odds ratio for ORR 1·45, 95% CI 0·96-2·20; two-sided p=0·078). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 185 (86%) of 215 itacitinib recipients and 178 (82%) of 216 placebo recipients, and most commonly included thrombocytopenia or platelet count decreased (78 [36%] vs 68 [31%]), neutropenia or neutrophil count decreased (49 [23%] vs 45 [21%]), anaemia (42 [20%] vs 26 [12%]), and hyperglycaemia (26 [12%] vs 28 [13%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in three of 215 patients (1%) in the itacitinib group and four of 216 (2%) in the placebo group. The observed improvement in ORR at day 28 with the addition of itacitinib versus placebo to corticosteroids did not reach the prespecified significance level. Further studies might provide additional insight into the utility of selective JAK1 inhibition for the treatment of acute GVHD. Incyte.

Prognostic Value of Elafin in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Prognostic Value of Elafin in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Evaluation of Elafin as a Prognostic Biomarker in Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic malignancies. The skin is the most commonly involved organ in GVHD. Elafin, a protease inhibitor overexpressed in inflamed epidermis, was previously identified as a diagnostic biomarker of skin GVHD; however, this finding was restricted to a subset of patients with isolated skin GVHD. The main driver of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in HCT recipients is gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD. Two biomarkers, Regenerating islet-derived 3a (REG3α) and Suppressor of tumorigenesis 2 (ST2), have been validated as biomarkers of GI GVHD that predict long-term outcomes in patients treated for GVHD. We undertook this study to determine the utility of elafin as a prognostic biomarker in the general population of acute GVHD patients in whom GVHD may develop in multiple organs. We analyzed serum elafin concentrations as a predictive biomarker of acute GVHD outcomes and compared it with ST2 and REG3α in a large group of patients treated at multiple centers. A total of 526 patients from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) who had received corticosteroid treatment for skin GVHD and who had not been previously studied were analyzed. Serum concentrations of elafin, ST2, and REG3α were measured by ELISA in all patients. The patients were divided at random into equal training and validation sets, and a competing-risk regression model was developed to model 6-month NRM using elafin concentration in the training set. Additional models were developed using concentrations of ST2 and REG3α or the combination of all 3 biomarkers as predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed using the validation set to evaluate the predictive accuracy of each model and to stratify patients into high- and low-risk biomarker groups. The cumulative incidence of 6-month NRM, overall survival (OS), and 4-week treatment response were compared between the risk groups. Unexpectedly, patients in the low-risk elafin group demonstrated a higher incidence of 6-month NRM, although the difference was not statistically significant (17% versus 11%; P=.19). OS at 6 months (68% versus 68%; P > .99) and 4-week response (78% versus 78%; P=.98) were similar in the low-risk and high-risk elafin groups. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.55 for elafin and 0.75 for the combination of ST2 and REG3α. The addition of elafin to the other 2 biomarkers did not improve the AUC. Our data indicate that serum elafin concentrations measured at the initiation of systemic treatment for acute GVHD did not predict 6-month NRM, OS, or treatment response in a multicenter population of patients treated systemically for acute GVHD. As seen in previous studies, serum concentrations of the GI GVHD biomarkers ST2 and REG3α were significant predictors of NRM, and the addition of elafin levels did not improve their accuracy. These results underscore the importance of GI disease in driving NRM in patients who develop acute GVHD.

Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Using Commercial Mesenchymal Stem Cell Products.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a life-threatening complication that can develop after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In particular, the prognosis of patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD is extremely poor. Ryoncil™ (remestemcel-L), a human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) product, failed to show superiority over placebo in patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD, but it was approved for use in pediatric patients in Canada and New Zealand based on the results of a subgroup analysis. Temcell®, an equivalent manufactured MSC product to remestemcel-L, was approved in Japan based on small single-arm studies by using a regulation for regenerative medicine in 2016. The efficacy of Temcell was evaluated in 381 consecutive patients treated with Temcell during the initial 3 years after its approval. Interestingly, its real-world efficacy was found to be equivalent to that observed in a prospective study of remestemcel-L with strict eligibility criteria. In this article, the potential of MSC therapy in the treatment of acute GVHD is discussed. A meticulous comparison of studies of remestemcel-L and Temcell, remestemcel-L/Temcell and ruxolitinib, and remestemcel-L/Temcell and thymoglobulin showed that the precise position of remestemcel-L/Temcell therapy in the treatment of acute GVHD remains to be determined.

Ruxolitinib for chronic steroid-refractory graft versus host disease: a single center experience

BackgroundChronic Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant that severely impacts quality of life and long-term survival. About 50-to-60 % of patients treated with steroids require a further line of therapy due to lack of sustained response. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, has recently been approved for the treatment of acute GvHD. MethodsWe aimed to retrospectively evaluate ruxolitinib efficacy and safety in a cohort of patients diagnosed with moderate (25 %) or severe (75 %) steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent chronic GvHD. Response evaluation was performed at three and six months. ResultsThirty-six patients received ruxolitinib after a median of three previous lines (range, r 1–11) for a median of 8.6 months (r 1–51.6). Cutaneous GvHD was the most frequent presentation. We observed an overall response of 59 % (CR 9%, PR 50 %) at three months and 62 % (CR 15 %, PR 46 %) at six months. Two patients had hematologic disease recurrence and were censored at relapse; no other permanent discontinuation due to adverse events were documented. Cutaneous, oral, genital and ocular GvHD significantly improved after treatment. 2-year overall survival and 2-year transplant related mortality were 74 % and 19 % respectively. Ruxolitinib was associated with a significant reduction of steroid dose. ConclusionRuxolitinib was confirmed to be a safe and effective option as salvage treatment also for advanced stages of chronic GvHD. Longer follow up is needed to evaluate durability of response. Prospective analyses on larger cohorts are ongoing.

Potential Use of Mesenchymal Multipotent Cells for Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Pro and Contra.

The potential of mesenchymal multipotent (stem) cells (MSC) to modify immune reactions and mediate hematopoiesis boosted great interest for their use in allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because of MSC production of a wide range of cytokines and growth factors, these cells are included in the therapy of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A number of clinical studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy of MSC-based therapy in acute GVHD. Japan and some other countries approved biomedical cell products on the base of allogeneic bone marrow (BM) MSCs as medical agents for acute GVHD treatment. Besides, MSCs may form BM stroma and improve hematopoiesis. Simultaneous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells and MSCs effectively improved engraftment and prevented GVHD in transplantation of umbilical cord blood and human leukocyte antigens-incompatible BM stem cells. The review presents the analysis of clinical studies of MSCs in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and discusses different approaches for improvement of MSC-based GVHD treatment and prophylaxis.

Recent advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major life-threating complication that occurs after allogeneic cell transplantation. Although steroids remain the first-line treatment, approximately one-third of patients will eventually develop steroid-resistant or steroid-refractory GVHD (SR-GVHD), which has an extremely poor prognosis. Many novel strategies that showed promising response rates in early phase I/II trials for the prevention and treatment of acute GVHD exhibited disappointing effects on patient survival in the SR-GVHD setting. The discovery of novel treatments has been further complicated by the absence of a clinically-relevant animal model. Nevertheless, the combined knowledge from translational studies using bone marrow transplantation models and clinical trials including SR-GVHD patients has begun to reveal novel mechanisms for inhibiting T cell signaling and promoting tissue regeneration, which has contributed to a better understanding of the SR-GVHD pathophysiology. Herein, we discuss recently elucidated cellular and molecular mechanisms that may provide the rational for novel biologically-driven treatments for SR-GVHD.

Glucagon-like peptide 2 for intestinal stem cell and Paneth cell repair during graft-versus-host disease in mice and humans

AbstractAcute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although currently used GVHD treatment regimens target the donor immune system, we explored here an approach that aims at protecting and regenerating Paneth cells (PCs) and intestinal stem cells (ISCs). Glucagon-like-peptide-2 (GLP-2) is an enteroendocrine tissue hormone produced by intestinal L cells. We observed that acute GVHD reduced intestinal GLP-2 levels in mice and patients developing GVHD. Treatment with the GLP-2 agonist, teduglutide, reduced de novo acute GVHD and steroid-refractory GVHD, without compromising graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects in multiple mouse models. Mechanistically GLP-2 substitution promoted regeneration of PCs and ISCs, which enhanced production of antimicrobial peptides and caused microbiome changes. GLP-2 expanded intestinal organoids and reduced expression of apoptosis-related genes. Low numbers of L cells in intestinal biopsies and high serum levels of GLP-2 were associated with a higher incidence of nonrelapse mortality in patients undergoing allo-HCT. Our findings indicate that L cells are a target of GVHD and that GLP-2–based treatment of acute GVHD restores intestinal homeostasis via an increase of ISCs and PCs without impairing GVL effects. Teduglutide could become a novel combination partner for immunosuppressive GVHD therapy to be tested in clinical trials.

A real life use of ruxolitinib in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease refractory to corticosteroid treatment in Latin American patients.

IntroductionGraft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication in allogeneic transplantation. The first-line treatment is high doses of corticosteroids. In the absence of response to corticosteroids, several immunosuppressive drugs can be used, but they entail an elevated risk of severe infections. Added to this, there are patients who do not improve on any immunosuppressive treatment, with subsequent deteriorated quality of life and high mortality. Ruxolitinib has been shown to induce responses in refractory patients. In this study we have presented our real-life experience.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on patients with severe GVHD refractory to corticosteroids. Demographic, previous treatment, response and mortality data were collected.ResultsSince 2014, seventeen patients with GVHD were treated with ruxolitinib due to refractoriness to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and a few to extracorporeal photopheresis, 8 with acute GVHD (1 pulmonary, 4 cutaneous grade IV and 3 digestive grade IV) and 9 with chronic GHVD (5 cutaneous sclerodermiform, 2 pulmonary and 1 multisystemic). The overall response to ruxolitinib treatment for acute GVHD was 80%, 40% with partial response and 40% with complete remission. Global response in chronic GVHD was 79%. The GVHD mortality was only seen in acute disease and was 40%. Causes of mortality in those patients were severe viral pneumonia, post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome and meningeal GVHD refractory to ruxolitinib.ConclusionsIn our series, the use of ruxolitinib as a rescue strategy in acute or chronic GVHD was satisfactory. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with a very poor prognosis showed encouraging results. However, the GVHD mortality remains high in refractory patients, showing that better therapeutic strategies are needed.

The Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Dimethyl Oxalyl Glycine Decreases Early Gastrointestinal GVHD in Experimental Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHI) promote stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and affect signaling cascades of inflammation and cell death. Their beneficial use in experimental models of ulcerative colitis and lung allograft rejection led us to test the effect of the PHI dimethyl oxalyl glycine (DMOG) in the pathophysiology of graft versus host disease (GVHD). Acute GVHD was induced in lethally irradiated BALB/c mice. DMOG was administered intraperitoneally on alternate days for the first 2-weeks posttransplant, and then twice a week till day +50, while controls received vehicle only. Animals were monitored for clinical GVHD and analyzed at day +7 and at day +50. DMOG treatment of allogeneic recipients improved survival by day +50, which was associated with decreased early gut injury and serum tumor necrosis factor-α compared with allogeneic controls. DMOG treatment of allogeneic recipients resulted in increased hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha expression and reduced apoptosis in the terminal ileum via Fas-associated protein with death domain protein repression along with decreased T-cell infiltration. Reduced pathology in colon after DMOG treatment associates with intestinal epithelium integrity and reduced damage caused by diminished recruitment of neutrophils. Taken together, we show protective effects of DMOG on early gut GVHD and improved survival in a model of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, providing the rationale for further evaluation of PHIs, in the prevention and treatment of acute GVHD.

Pediatric Acute Gvhd: Transcriptome Analysis of Gastrointestinal Biopsies Reveal a Unique Signature in Pediatric Acute GI Gvhd with Involvement of the ERK Pathway and Similarities with Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

<h3>Introduction</h3> Studies of target organs at the time of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) are needed to identify novel inflammatory and regulatory pathways. <h3>Methods</h3> We performed a prospective transcriptome analysis of gastrointestinal (GI) biopsies at diagnosis of acute GI GVHD and compared these to bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients without GVHD. Allogeneic BMT patients ≥2 years old undergoing endoscopy for clinical indications had 2 additional rectosigmoid mucosal biopsies for transcriptome analysis. Transcriptome data from 211 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients were included to uncover genes and pathways shared between GVHD and UC. Rectal biopsies from 20 children without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) served as controls. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-one patients underwent endoscopy pre (n=5) or post BMT (n=16). Median age of patients was 13.5 years (range 4.5 -25 years). Four patients were excluded from analyses (pre BMT colitis n=3, no lower GI biopsy n=1). Nine patients had acute GI GVHD, while 8 patients did not (Table 1). Principal component analysis shows patient clustering of those with and without GVHD, suggesting distinct transcriptomic mechanisms driving disease (Figure 1A). We identified 1310 significant genes, 144 of which were downregulated and 1266 upregulated in acute GVHD compared to no GVHD (Figure 1B). Top upregulated biological processes in GVHD revealed an innate antimicrobial response and associated cytokine signaling, notable for interferons. Top 20 differentially expressed genes in acute GVHD (Table 2), include CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11, which are chemokines involved in GVHD, and IDO1 which regulates tryptophan metabolism. Four hundred and ninety shared genes were upregulated, and 126 genes were downregulated in GVHD and UC. Notable shared downregulated pathways involved butyrate metabolism (Table 3). DUOXA2, a gene involved in regulating innate antimicrobial responses in IBD, was the top upregulated genes in pediatric IBD and was the second highest differentially expressed gene in the acute GVHD, providing additional rationale for intestinal microbiome modulation in both diseases. Genes involving the ERK1/2 cascade (Table 4) were upregulated in acute GVHD (p=1.67 × 10 ⁻³) providing rationale for exploring ERK1/2 inhibition as novel acute GVHD treatment. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Acute GI GVHD has a distinct transcriptome signature which includes pathways of innate antimicrobial responses highlighting the role for microbiome modulation. The ERK1/2 cascade pathway is upregulated, suggesting a novel target in acute GI GVHD. Acute GI GVHD has important similarities with the UC transcriptome, including upregulation of DUOXA2 and downregulation in butyrate metabolism in both.