Attempt Treatment-free Remission Research Articles

Treatment-free remission after a second TKI discontinuation attempt in patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia re-treated with dasatinib – interim results from the DAstop2 trial

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become part of routine care for patients with a sustained deep molecular response (DMR). Approximately 50% experience a molecular relapse upon TKI cessation. Most of them quickly regain DMR upon TKI resumption. Whether these patients can achieve a second treatment-free remission (TFR) remains unclear. DAstop2 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03573596) is a prospective study including patients with a failed first TFR attempt re-treated with any TKI for ≥ one year. Upon entering the study, patients received the TKI dasatinib for additional two years. Patients with sustained DMR for ≥1 year qualified for a second TKI stop. Ninety-four patients were included between Oct 2017-Dec 2021. At the time of data analysis, 62 patients had attempted a 2nd stop. After a median follow-up of 27 months from 2nd stop, TFR rates were 61, 56 and 46% at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. No progression to advanced stage disease was seen and 87% had re-achieved MR4 within a median of 3 months from TKI re-initiation. In summary, we show that a 2nd TFR attempt after dasatinib treatment is safe, feasible and TFR rates seem in the range of those reported in trials of a first TKI stop.

Identification of Individual Risk Factors for Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Failure in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) Patients: Predictive Models Developed on a Nationwide Clinical and Claim Database

Introduction Over the past decade, the landscape of CML has been radically improved by the introduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI). However, since prolonged TKI treatment would reduce compliance, with associated risk of relapse and progression, and increased toxicities, patients (pts) who achieve and maintain a deep molecular response can now attempt TKI treatment discontinuation to achieve TFR. As TFR attempts may fail due to loss of major molecular response and imply restart of TKI therapy, it is essential to study individual factors associated with TFR outcome and to develop predictive models to provide TFR outcome likelihood with respect to pts' characteristics. Methods Predictive models of TFR failure at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after TFR attempts were developed on 2 populations: (i) on CP- CML pts managed in a reference center for CML who attempted TFR between January 2003 and January 2023, named CML-pts and (ii) on those CML-pts for which an individual indirect linkage to nationwide claim database succeeded, named CML-linked-pts. The model was thus developed based (i) on clinical data exclusively (demographics, CML characteristics, TKI lines, molecular response), and (ii) on clinical data combined with claim data, which provided information on comorbidities, other treatments than TKI and any healthcare resource use (HCRU) of interest. Correlation and features' predictive power was assessed through Pearson's correlation and predictive power scores (PPS). Logistic regression model and machine learning algorithms (k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, single decision tree, random forest, multilayer perceptron, and gradient boosting machine) were used. Nested k-fold cross-validation (CV) was used to assess the robustness of the algorithms over all data and hyperparameter optimization was performed. Features' contribution to predict TFR outcomes were assessed using SHAP (“SHapley Additive exPlanations”) values. Results Analysis on (i) 208 CML-pts, who attempted 250 TFR - 208 first attempts (TFR 1), 42 second attempts (TFR 2). Median age was 59.6 (IQR:20.6) and 60.6 (IQR:18.2) years at TFR 1 and TFR 2, respectively, and M/F sex ratio was 1.17 and 1.1. The overall proportion of TFR failure was 35.6%, 43.6%, 46.8% and 48.8% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Analysis on (ii) 118 CML-linked-ptss, who attempted 134 TFRs (110 TFR 1 24 TFR 2). Median age was 61.5 (IQR: 21.1) and 61.4 (IQR: 12.0) years at TFR 1 and TFR 2, respectively, and M/F sex ratio was 1.04 and 1.18. The proportion of TFR failure was 35.0%, 43.2%, 46.2% and 49.3% at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. Studied predictive variables, in both populations (i) and (ii), had little correlation with TFR outcomes, ranging respectively from (i) -0.2 to 0.2 and (ii) -0.16 to +0.31, with poor predictive power (PPS from (i) 0 to 0.19, (ii) 0 to 0.25). Overall, predictive models hardly correctly predicted TFR failure - with sensitivity below 50% and were stronger at rather predicting absence of TFR failure - with specificity above 80%. Best performances were obtained with logistic regression model for both populations, for predicting at 6 and 12 months for population (i) and 6 months for population (ii). Accuracies were 72% for population (i) - with F1-score (i.e., model's ability to predict failure) of 50.0% at 6 months and 69.6% at 24 months -, and 77.8% for population (ii) - with F1-score 66.7% at 6 months. SHAP values showed that attempting a second TFR was the most predictive factor of TFR failure for both populations (i) and (ii) (see Figure 1). Sensitivity analyses considering only TFR 1 in the models showed no improvement in performance. Conclusion Although this study was conducted on one of the largest TFR cohorts ever studied, prediction abilities of the models for TFR failure at the different time points were not sufficient to be proposed as a decision support tool, when developed with either clinical data or with both clinical and claim data. The models were indeed able to predict success but did not manage to find patterns to predict failure; only TFR number had predictive power of TFR outcome. Besides, claim data did not provide HCRU-related predictive factors. Among study limits, this monocentric cohort would reflect homogeneous practices in a same center. Analysis on larger cohorts of patients from different centers would potentially allow the capture of more variability in clinical practices.

Retrospective Study to Evaluate Probability of MR4 Maintenance Following Frontline Nilotinib Dose De-Escalation after MR4 Achievement in the Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

Introduction: Nilotinib (NIL) is a potent second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) in chronic phase, but reported to increase long-term toxicity such as cardiovascular (CV) risks. The ENESTfreedom study (Leukemia 2021) has reported 55% of treatment-free remission (TFR) rate after front line NIL discontinuation with a median 43.5 months of NIL treatment duration. Question still remains how to improve TFR rate after NIL frontline therapy. A potential solution is dose de-escalation (DESC) after MR4 achievement which could reduce the CV risk while extending MR4 duration prior to TFR attempt, thus increasing the chance of successful TFR attempt. DESTINY trial (Lancet Haematology 2019) had attempted TKI dose DESC to half of the standard dose for 12 months before stopping TKI therapy, reporting only 3 pts (2.4%) lost molecular response after TKI dose DESC in 125 pts who achieved molecular response with 4 log or deeper (MR4). However, 85% of this cohort is mainly treated with imatinib, limiting applying this experience in NIL treated pts. Accordingly, the present study attempted to evaluate the efficacy of NIL dose DESC following MR4 achievement based on real-world experience. Patients & Method: We have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of adult pts with CML in chronic phase treated with NIL frontline therapy and achieved sustained MR4 ( BCR::ABL1 transcript ≤0.01%IS). From the pts treated with NIL frontline therapy, we identified the cases attempted NIL de-scalation after achievement of MR4. The molecular response after NIL de-escalation was closely monitored every 3 months using BCR::ABL1 qPCR. Molecular recurrence was defined as an increase in BCR::ABL1 transcript levels above MR4 on at least two consecutive occasions or a single increase in BCR::ABL1 transcript level above MR3 ( BCR::ABL1 transcript ≤0.1%IS). At any time, pts who lost MR3 had returned Nilotinib dose to 300 mg BID. Primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival (EFS) following NIL de-escalation, which was defined from NIL DESC starts to molecular recurrence or death from any cause. Results: We have identified 52 pts who started NIL as first line therapy for CML-CP under clinical practice. With median follow-up duration of 9 years (range:2-12 years), 33 patient (64%) remains on NIL at the last follow-up visit. In 33 pts on NIL treatment, with a median follow up duration of 8 years (range;2-12), 25 (76%) had attempted NIL DESC at median of 6 years (range; 1-10 years) after frontline NIL therapy start, of whom the median time from NIL start to MR4 achievement was 12 months (range: 5-50 months). The median time from first achievement of MR4 to NIL DESC starts was 50 months (range: 3-105 months), while the median time from NIL start to NIL DESC was 77 months (range: 13-121 months). At the latest follow up, only one patient experienced molecular recurrence at 3 months after DESC but regained MR3 in 9 months after re-escalation of NIL to 300mg BID. One patient died of cardiac arrest at 80 months after NIL DESC with other comorbidities of coronary artery disease, hypertension and diabetes. One patient discontinued NIL at 51 months post DESC and has sustained MR4 till last follow up. In the DESC group, the EFS at 3 years, 95% (69.5-99.3%). There is another case developed myocardial infarction while on DESC dose of NIL, who switched the treatment to Asciminib. Conclusion: Achieving early and sustained MR4 with frontline NIL treatment facilitates DESC approach without compromising molecular response and might promote the TFR rate by extending MR4 duration. This DESC strategy can bridge CML pts on NIL frontline therapy prior to NIL discontinuation for TFR attempt.

Full Treatment-Free Remission Outcome in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Following One Year of Nilotinib De-Escalation: 96-Week Update of Dante Study

Introduction: Treatment-free remission (TFR) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is achievable and recommended for patients (pts) in sustained deep molecular response (DMR) who can discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment while maintaining responses. Studies investigating TKI de-escalation before TFR are mainly in imatinib-treated CML chronic phase (CP) pts and suggest that this stepwise approach is feasible. Although nilotinib (NIL) is the first and only TKI approved for stopping therapy, nilotinib-based TFR optimization strategy has not been formally studied. Our phase II, single-arm, prospective, multicenter DANTE study (NCT03874858) aims to shed light on frontline NIL de-escalation in terms of full treatment-free remission (FTFR) (primary endpoint) and TFR rate (secondary endpoint) 96 weeks after the start of consolidation in CML-CP Italian patients. Our previously analysis on 40 pts with sustained DMR who entered in the TFR phase showed that approximately 68% of pts remained disease-free 1 year after stopping NIL 1. Here we present the data of 89 patients who successfully completed NIL de-escalation and at least 1 year of TFR. Methods: Adults patients with CML-CP treated with NIL 300 mg twice daily (bid) in first line for ≥3 years who achieved sustained DMR for ≥1 year (≥MR 4.0; BCR-ABL level ≤0.01% IS) were enrolled in 27 centers. The study consisted of 4 phases: screening (week [wk] −4-0), consolidation (wk 0-48), TFR (wk 48-144), and follow-up (until wk 144). Ongoing treatment with ≥400 mg/day dose was allowed at study entry. During consolidation pts were treated with NIL 300 mg once daily (qd). At the end of consolidation phase, pts with sustained DMR entered TFR phase and NIL was discontinued. Patients with major molecular response (MMR [BCR-ABL ≤0.1% IS]) but without sustained DMR continued NIL 300 mg qd. At any time, pts with loss of MMR returned to NIL 300 mg bid. During TFR phase, BCR-ABL levels were monitored monthly from wk 52-96 and then every 3 months. Here we report updated results collected until the cut-off date of 8th February 2023, when all patients who entered the TFR phase had completed at least one year of TFR or switched to full-dose phase or entered in survival follow-up or discontinued the study. The primary endpoint of the study is FTFR, defined as the percentage of patients (in both TFR phase and NIL half-dose) in MMR or better at week 96. Results: Overall, 113 pts were screened and 107 entered in consolidation phase. The baseline characteristics and the clinical outcome of the 107 patients are shown in Tab 1. Specifically, 98/107 (92%) completed the consolidation phase, while 9 pts discontinued permanently (2 due to loss of MMR, 3 due to adverse events (AEs) and 4 due to patient decision). Noteworthy, 89/107 (83%) with sustained DMR entered in the TFR phase, while 9 pts maintained MMR but not sustained DMR (7 entered in NIL half dose follow-up period and were in FTFR at 96 weeks, while 2 discontinued the study before week 96). At 1 year cut-off data, 71/107 pts (66.4%) were in FTFR, meeting the primary endpoint of study. We observed 64/89 pts (72%) who entered in the TFR phase remained in MMR or better after a median duration of 20.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1.9-32.4), meeting the main secondary endpoint of the study. The median time to loss of MMR in TFR phase was not reached (Fig 1). The remaining 25/89 pts (28%) had discontinued the TFR phase (21 pts due to loss of MMR, 1 due to AEs and 3 pts for subject/guardian decision). The median time spent in TFR phase until loss of MMR was 3.6 months (IQR 2-19 months). At the cut-off data, 23/24 pts (96%) who restarted NIL after MMR loss regained MMR and MR4 after a median time of 2.7 months (IQR 1.0-5.6) and 4.1 months (IQR 1.2-10), respectively. Notably, 20/24 (83%) who restarted NIL after MMR loss achieved MR4.5 after a median time of 6.4 months (IQR 2.0-16.9). During the TFR phase, all-grade AEs were reported in 64/89 pts (72%). One pt (1.1%) had serious AE (pneumonia). No deaths and disease progressions were observed. Conclusions: Our findings show that 66.4% pts who entered in consolidation phase achieved FTFR 96 weeks after the start of the consolidation period, and approximately 72% of pts remained disease-free at 1 year after stopping NIL. Overall, our data suggest that de-escalation of NIL before TFR attempt in CML-CP pts with sustained DMR can be a successful dose-optimization strategy. 1Stagno F. et al., Blood (2022) 140 (Supplement 1): 9614-9616.

Real-World Evidence of Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia at an Academic Center in the Deep South

Background: Treatment-free remission (TFR) is increasingly becoming a treatment goal for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Although strict criteria guide tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation, there exists a knowledge gap in understanding patient and provider experience regarding TFR in real-world clinical practice. Here, we report our TFR experience in patients with CML-CP, treated at an academic center in the Deep South. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate outcomes of patients with CML-CP at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The NCCN Version 2.2023 criteria for TKI discontinuation was utilized. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Results: We identified 204 patients with CML-CP through electronic medical records (EMR) . The median follow-up for the entire population was 95m (range 2-246m). The median age was 54y (range 21-75y) and majority of the patients were females (62%) and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) (70%). A diagnostic bone marrow biopsy was performed on 59% of the patients. Most of the patients had p210 breakpoint (93%). Frontline therapy mainly consisted of imatinib (42%), dasatinib (32%) and nilotinib (16%). Out of the 204 patients, 44 (22%) met all the criteria for TKI discontinuation (Table 1). The median age for these patients was 53y (range 20-75y) and majority of the patients were females (68%) and NHWs (68%). Frontline therapy consisted of imatinib (59%), dasatinib (23%) and nilotinib (18%). Out of the 44 patients eligible for TFR attempt, 35 (80%) were offered TKI discontinuation by their provider whereas 9 (20%) were not. Reasons for not offering TKI discontinuation were not documented in the EMR. Twenty-four out of 35 patients attempted TKI discontinuation. The median time to TKI discontinuation for these patients was 114m (range 45-246m). Frontline therapy consisted of imatinib (n=13), dasatinib (n=7) and nilotinib (n=4) for those that attempted TFR. Ten patients had to resume TKI (imatinib=5, dasatinib=1, nilotinib=4) due to an increasing transcript after a median of 8m (range 2-29m). The remaining 14 patients (58%) remain in TFR to date with a median follow-up of 29m (6-51m). Eleven patients, eligible for TKI discontinuation, were offered a trial of TFR but did not attempt it. Three patients were satisfied with ongoing therapy and did not want to attempt TKI discontinuation or dose-reduction. Eight patients were hesitant to discontinue therapy and agreed to reduce the dose of the current therapy after discussing with their provider. Seven of those eight patients remain on a reduced TKI dose and 1 had to increase the dose due to an increase in transcript. Conclusion: In our single-center experience, we report that although most of the patients eligible for TKI discontinuation were offered a TFR attempt by their provider, there remains room for improvement. More than half the patients that attempted TKI discontinuation remain off therapy. Patient preference was the main reason for not attempting TKI discontinuation but there was willingness to attempt dose-reduction. Further studies are needed to understand both patient and provider perspectives regarding TFR to identify opportunities for improvement.

Excellent Early and Major Molecular Responses Observed with Asciminib Treatment for CP-CML: Results from the ALLG CML13 Ascend-CML Study

ATP-competitive BCR::ABL1 inhibitors are effective in many patients with CP-CML patients. However, a significant minority experience treatment failure with currently available drugs due to resistance or toxicity. Asciminib, a first-in-class myristoyl site BCR::ABL1 inhibitor, is now indicated in many jurisdictions for CP-CML after ≥2 prior lines of treatment. The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) CML13 ASCEND-CML trial assessed its tolerability and efficacy in the frontline setting, where data are scarce. ALLG CML13 is a prospective open-label phase II study that completed enrolment in Dec 2022 at 14 sites. Patients commenced asciminib 40mg twice a day (BID) at time of diagnosis, and were assessed according to optimal 2020 ELN targets ( BCR::ABL1 ≤10%, ≤1% & ≤0.1% at 3, 6, 12 months respectively); and ≤0.01% at 18 months. Patients in Major Molecular Response (MMR; BCR::ABL1 ≤0.1%) at 12 months were switched to 80mg QD for ease of administration. Patients with treatment failure ( BCR::ABL1 >10% at 3 or 6 months; BCR::ABL1 >1% at 12 or 18 months) continued asciminib, with additional imatinib or dasatinib or nilotinib, according to physician preference. Patients with a suboptimal response at 6, 12, or 18 months, but without treatment failure, continued asciminib but with the dose doubled to 80mg BID. This is a pre-specified analysis of the co-primary end points: i) final analysis of Early Molecular Response (EMR, BCR::ABL1 ≤10% at 3 months) and ii) interim analysis of MMR by 12 months. By data cut-off in May 2023, 101 patients had median follow-up of 20 (0-29) months (including 1 patient who enrolled but never started therapy due to elevated lipase at baseline). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, (reported in 6% and 5% of patients, respectively); increased lipase/amylase reported in 8% (clinical pancreatitis reported in 2%), anaemia (2%), infection (2%) and 1% each of increased AST/ALT, back, abdominal and chest pain from pulmonary embolism. The only treatment emergent vascular event was a stroke, reported in a male patient aged 73 with pre-existing diabetes and hypertension, after 20 months of asciminib. Fifteen patients discontinued asciminib: 6 due to AEs (2 with persistent cytopenia requiring an allograft, 3 with recurrent asymptomatic lipase elevation, 1 with pancreatitis); 3 lost to follow-up; and 6 due to resistant disease (1 confirmed loss of MMR at 9 months, without ABL1 mutation; 1 transformed to lymphoid blast crisis at 6 months with myristoyl site mutations A337T/V and P465S; 1 loss of MMR at 6 months with A337T mutation; 1 loss of MR2 with V506L; and 2 with failure to achieve EMR - below). No other transformation occurred. During the first 3 months of treatment, 85% of patients had an assigned dose density of >90%; 9% of patients dose reduced to <66%. EMR was achieved by 94/101 patients (93.1%; 96% CI 86-97%): 1 patient never started treatment, 1 patient missed this assessment, 3 patients had withdrawn by this timepoint, and 2 had BCR::ABL1 of 24% and 210%, respectively. Neither of the EMR failure patients had myristoyl site mutations; both were subsequently intolerant of combination TKI/asciminib therapy because of cytopenia and headaches, respectively and are now on dasatinib monotherapy. Six patients dose escalated and remain on asciminib 80mg BID: 3 after failing to achieve MMR by 12 months, & 3 failing to achieve MR4 after 18 months; 2 have since achieved their targets. By 3 months, 48/101 (48%) patients achieved MMR and 12 (11.9%) achieved MR4. Considering only patients with >12 months of follow up, the interim rate of MMR by 12 months is 62/75 patients (82.7%; 98% CI 70-92%). With “off-protocol for any reason” as the competing risk, the cumulative incidences of MMR & MR4.5 by 12 months were 81.1% & 32.3% respectively (Figure). ASCEND is one of the first studies using frontline asciminib, with excellent achievement of EMR and MMR, and low transformation rate. Rates of MMR at 12 months are comparable to those reported with second generation TKIs, though achievement of deeper responses appears more rapid with asciminib. Treatment was well tolerated in general: majority of AEs were grade I/II events that did not result in treatment discontinuation, and only one vascular event was observed. Early achievement of MMR and MR4 may accelerate eligibility for, & increased success of, treatment-free remission attempts.

International, Prospective Study Comparing Nilotinib Versus Imatinib with Early Switch to Nilotinib to Obtain Sustained Treatment-Free Remission in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (SUSTRENIM trial): Analysis of the Eligibility to Treatment Discontinuation

Background. Treatment free remission (TFR) is one of the most important aims of CML treatment but, so far, the best treatment strategy to obtain a durable deep molecular response (DMR) and the overall rate of patients able to achieve a successful TKI discontinuation based on intention-to-treat principle from CML diagnosis are still debated. In November 2016 we launched an international, prospective, randomized, two arms study to evaluate both the depth of the molecular response and the rate of TFR in newly diagnosed CP-CML patients treated with a second generation TKI (Nilotinib, NIL) or with imatinib (IM) followed by switching to NIL in absence of optimal response (Clinical Trial number 02602314). Patients were randomized 1:1 between NIL and IM, stratifying on the Sokal score. All the patients achieving a MR4.0 or better by three years and maintaining this level of response up to the end of the fourth year of therapy were qualified for the discontinuation phase. We recently reported that patients enrolled in the NIL arm had a rate of MR4.5 at two years (primary co-endpoint of the study), significantly higher than those in the IM arm (32 vs 22%, p = 0.023 Pane F. et al, EHA 2022). The aim of the present analysis is to assess, in both arms of the trial, the percentage of patients achieving the eligibility to treatment discontinuation, defined as a MR4 maintained in 4 consecutive MRD analysis within the fourth year of therapy. Methods. In this pilot analysis, we first examined the rate of patients eligible to discontinuation and their baseline features (i.e. age, gender, ELTS and Sokal risk, BCR::ABL1 isoform) compared to patients without sustained MR4, using Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon according to variable type. In patients discontinuing TKIs at 48 months, the successful TFR probability at 12 months after TKI withdrawal was computed with the Kaplan Meier method. Molecular relapse, defined as the loss of MMR or confirmed loss of MR3.0, progression, or death were considering as event in the event-free survival curve. Results. Of the 448 randomized patients, 289 had at least 48-month observation at the time of the present analysis and were evaluated for TFR eligibility, 141 in the IM arm and 148 in the NIL arm, respectively. Ninety-three patients (32%) showed a sustained MR4 in the fourth year and were deemed eligible for treatment discontinuation, 45 in the IM arm (32%) and 48 in the NIL arm (32%). Of the remaining 196 patients, 59 did not have the criteria to discontinue treatment and 137 previously went off study for failure, progression, toxicity, death, or other causes (66 in the IM arm and 71 in the NIL arm, respectively). We found that sustained MR4 achievement was significantly associated with low disease risk, according to both ELTS (81.7% vs 47.2% p<0.0001) and Sokal scores (50.5% vs 34.2%, p=0.008). There is a weak correlation to the age, being those eligible younger (median 52.5 vs 55 years, p=0.037), while no differences in gender and BCR::ABL1 isoform distributions were observed. Within the IM arm, patients who switched to NIL were 60/141 (43%), 44 within the first 12 months and 16 after the first year; those patients had a lower probability of starting the TFR phase compared to patients continuing IM (22% vs 40%, p=0.025). The median follow-up of the 93 patients who attempted treatment discontinuation at 48 months is 9.9 months (IQR: 5.3-12.1). The percentages of those patients in TFR were 82.9% (95% CI:74.8-91.8) at 6 months and 74.3% (95% CI:63.9-86.4) at 12 months. The analysis per random was considered premature given the short follow-up and the proportion of patients not yet evaluable for the discontinuation. Conclusions Although the results are still preliminary to draw definitive conclusions on the rate of sustained DMR and stable TFR , our data indicates that despite higher 24-month rates of MR4.5 in the NIL arm, the probability of reaching criteria for TFR attempt may be not different in the two study arms: one third of patients attempted discontinuation and the majority of them appear to be free of relapse after a median of 10 months from the therapy discontinuation. Among patients of the IM arm, patients switching to NIL due to absence of optimal response had a lower probability to attempt discontinuation. Noteworthy, as for the MR4.5 rate at 24 mo. of therapy, patients at low ELTS risk score are those with the highest probability to achieve sustained MR4 and being eligible for the treatment discontinuation.

ASC4START and ASC4FIRST: Two Ongoing Phase 3 Trials Investigating Asciminib Monotherapy As First-Line Therapy Versus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

Background: The current standard of care (SoC) for newly diagnosed patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) is treatment with 1 of the 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved for this use (first generation [1G] imatinib [IMA] and second generation [2G] bosutinib [BOS], dasatinib [DAS], and nilotinib [NIL]). Although TKIs have vastly improved treatment outcomes, pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP experience lack of efficacy and intolerance to available treatments. A large number of pts treated with IMA do not achieve major molecular response (MMR) and even fewer pts achieve deep molecular response, a key requirement to attempt treatment-free remission. Treatment with 2G TKIs results in larger proportions of pts achieving deep responses albeit still with a sizeable minority not reaching this goal. Also, many pts are intolerant to 2G TKIs, resulting in therapy switching, frequently multiple times. For pts who remain on treatment, even low-grade adverse events (AEs) may significantly impact quality of life (QoL) given the long-term nature of treatment. Improved treatments with high efficacy and improved tolerability are needed to limit therapy switching, reduce treatment discontinuation, maintain, or improve pt QoL, and allow pts to remain on treatment at an optimal dose for longer duration to achieve deep responses. Asciminib is the first and only approved BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that works by specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP). This unique mechanism of action (MoA) has no confirmed overlapping mutation-driven resistance profile with ATP-competitive TKIs. Asciminib shows better selectivity compared to other TKIs, with no known off-target kinase-mediated effects due to its MoA; this translates into improved tolerability. In clinical trials (Hughes et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; Rea et al. Blood 2021), asciminib has demonstrated sustained efficacy and a favorable safety profile over time in pts with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs as well as in pts with T315I mutation. Asciminib as monotherapy and in combination with ATP-competitive TKIs is being studied as first-line (1L) treatment in CML. The ongoing ASC4FIRST (NCT04971226) study is investigating the efficacy and safety of asciminib 80 mg once daily (QD) monotherapy vs investigator-selected 1G or 2G TKI in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP ( Table 1). The primary endpoint of ASC4FIRST is MMR rate at 48 weeks. The ongoing ASC4START (NCT05456191) study is focused on pt-centric objectives, assessing the tolerability and efficacy of asciminib vs 2G TKI NIL in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. The primary endpoint of ASC4START is time to treatment discontinuation due to an AE ( Table 1). Current Status: As of December 20, 2022, the ASC4FIRST study completed recruitment, with 405 pts enrolled worldwide. The end of study (EOS) will occur 5 years from the last pt first treatment in the study. Pts will continue to receive the assigned treatment until the EOS, or until premature discontinuation due to treatment failure, disease progression or intolerance, or due to investigator or participant decision. Between 21 November 2022 and 25 July 2023, 180 pts have been screened for the ASC4START study, with 147 pts randomized to treatment (n=52 France, n=40 Germany, n=9 Bulgaria, n=7 Czechia, n=7 Hungary, n=6 Korea, n=6 Singapore, n=2 Slovakia, n=5 Argentina, n=3 Greece, n=2 each from Slovakia, Malaysia, and Oman, and n=1 each from the USA, Italy, Romania, UK, Jordan, and Canada). Recruitment is ongoing. Patients will be treated until approximately 64 discontinuations of either study treatment due to an AE have been recorded. Conclusions: With demonstrated efficacy and improved tolerability compared to ATP-binding TKIs, asciminib has the potential to become the therapy of choice for CML in 1L, enabling newly diagnosed patients to remain on therapy with improved QoL and overall survival, and reducing the need for therapy switching, ultimately allowing patients to achieve optimal milestone responses and reach treatment goals. Findings from these two trials will provide comprehensive evidenceon the use of asciminib as 1L therapy for newly diagnosed pts with Ph+ CML-CP.

Outcomes of Adolescents and Young Adult Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Era of Second-Generation TKIs and Treatment-Free Remission

Background: While chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is most often diagnosed in older adults, it is frequently diagnosed in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Defined by the NCI as individuals between the ages of 15-39 years old, AYA CML patients have been understudied by comparison to their older counterparts, with little known about their outcomes in the United States (US) in the era of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and treatment-free remission (TFR). We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of AYA patients with CML at our institution, a CML specialty center. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with CML who were diagnosed between the ages of 15-39 years old and seen in our adult hematology clinic between January 2012 and December 2022. Patients were identified by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes from the electronic medical record and chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Outcomes evaluating second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs) started with patients diagnosed in June 2010. Outcomes evaluating molecular response included BCR-ABL1 PCR testing conducted after implementation of the International Scale (IS) in 2012. Molecular treatment milestones were defined per the 2023 NCCN guidelines for CML. Results: Of 396 CML patients evaluated at our institution, 136 (34.3%) were diagnosed as AYA at a median age of 31 years (range 15-39). The majority were male (62.5%; n=85/136) and English speaking (94.1%; n=128/136). The most frequently cited race/ethnicities were Caucasian (40.4%; n=55/136), Asian (20.6%; n=28/136), and Hispanic (19.1%; n=26/136). At time of diagnosis, 91.2% (n=124/136) were in chronic phase (CP), followed by 4.4% (n=6/136) in accelerated phase (AP) and 4.4% (n=6/136) in blast phase (BP). Of those diagnosed in advanced phase, 91.7% (n=11/12) were male and 66.7% (n=8/12) were Asian or Hispanic. Of CP patients evaluated, 75.8% (n=94/124) started treatment in the 2G-TKI era. Most CP patients were first prescribed dasatinib (61.7%; n=58/94), followed by imatinib (28.7%; n=27/94), and nilotinib (8.5%; n=8/94). Of 62 patients in CP with available molecular data after 2012, 64.5% (n=40/62) met a transcript level <10% at 3-months and 80.6% (n=50/62) met a transcript level <1% at 12-months. Major molecular response (MMR) was achieved and maintained in 59.7% (n=37/62) of these patients, with 25.8% (n=16/62) losing MMR and 14.5% (n=9/62) never achieving MMR. Reasons for loss of MMR included TFR attempts (31.3%; n=5/16), non-adherence from side effects (25%; n=4/16), lack of health insurance/inability to afford medication (18.8%; n=3/16), lack of response (18.8%; n=3/16), and pregnancy attempts (6.3%; n=1/16). Fertility was a notable issue for AYA patients, with 16 females (31.4%; n=16/51) and 18 patients overall (13.2%; n=18/136) interrupting or delaying start of TKI because of pregnancy/fertility. For patients who attempted TFR, 48.1% (n=13/27) remained off TKI in MMR at time of last follow-up. Of 130 AYA patients with CP or AP CML at diagnosis, 7.7% (n=10/130) experienced disease transformation, including 3.2% (n=3/94) of CP patients in the 2G-TKI era. Of 14 patients who presented or transformed into BP, 42.8% (n=6/14) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation and 64.3% (n=9/14) died. Of the entire cohort, 9.56% (n=13/136) patients died at a median age of 35 years old, including 5.4% who presented in CP (n=7/124) and 50% (n=6/12) of those who presented in AP/BP. Of the 13 who died, 11 (84.6%) died from CML-related complications. Conclusions: This represents the largest analysis of NCI-defined AYA CML patients in the US in the 2G-TKI era. Molecular response, progression and successful TFR rates in AYA CP CML patients appear to approximate those reported in prior large clinical trials that compared 2G-TKIs with imatinib. AYA patients can experience unique challenges that impact their management, including pregnancy/fertility and adherence, which can affect clinical outcomes. Patients may also present with aggressive advanced phase disease leading to mortality despite transplantation. Further study is warranted to better support the needs of this patient population. Evaluation of CML patients ≥ 40 years old at diagnosis at our institution is ongoing. A formal comparison between these groups will be presented.

Treatment-Free Remission in Ponatinib-Treated CML Patients: The Italy-Tfr Experience

Background: In recent years, treatment-free remission (TFR) has become a new therapeutic goal and is considered feasible even by international expert guidelines, at least in patients (pts) with a stable deep molecular response (DMR). From the EPIC study, we learned that many pts achieve a DMR very early, regardless of Sokal risk (Lipton, Lancet Oncol 2016). The Optic study showed that early dose reduction is associated with a containment of cardiovascular (CV) risk while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. In the cohort of pts initially treated with 45 mg QD, the number of events remained around 10% (Cortes, Blood 2021). Recommendations for treatment discontinuation suggest that it should be considered only after one line of treatment or after a second line if first-line TKI was switched for intolerance. Since 2016, there are case reports in the literature of imatinib-resistant pts, treated with ponatinib in second or following lines due to intolerance or resistance to previous TKIs, with or without ABL1 mutations, who reduced the daily dosage from 45 to 15 mg, still achieving a DMR and then discontinued ponatinib due to toxicity, obtaining a persistent TFR (Wisniowski, Blood 2016; Engel, J Oncol Pract 2016; Cohen, Leuk Lymphoma 2020). Methods: Within the context of the Italy-TFR retrospective and prospective study (NCT04769947) which is ongoing and actually includes 467 pts, we collected the data of 19 pts who attempted TFR after ponatinib treatment. Results: Median age was 44 years at diagnosis, 60 years at ponatinib discontinuation. 8 pts were male (42%); Sokal score was available for 14 pts: 5, 3 and 6 pts were low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. ELTS score was available for 11 pts: 6 pts, 4 and 1 were low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. 6 pts were treated with ponatinib in second line, 9 in third line, 3 in forth line. First-line therapy was available for 16 pts and was imatinib for 11 pts, nilotinib for 2 pts, dasatinib for 3 pts. Median duration of front-line treatment was 16 months (mos, IQR 11-34). Data on second line therapy was available for 11/12 pts: 5 pts were treated with nilotinib, 6 with dasatinib. Median duration of second-line treatment was 47 mos (IQR 19-58). Third line therapy was dasatinib for all 3 pts, with a duration of 1, 18 and 139 mos. Reason for starting ponatinib was intolerance for 8 pts, resistance for the others. For 7/11 resistant pts response at ponatinib start was CHR for one pt, MR1 for 3 pts, MR2 for 3 pts. 3 pts carried 1 ABL1 mutation at ponatinib start: 1 F359V, 1 M244V and 1 T315I; 1 pt carried 2 mutations: 1 Y253H and 1 E499E. Patients received ponatinib for a median of 47 mos (IQR 34-54). Starting dose was 45 mg for 6 pts, 30 mg for 8 pts and 15 mg for 5 pts. Response at 3 mos was available for 17 pts and was MR2 for 2 pts, MR3 for 9 pts and DMR for 6 pts. Median time to DMR was 18 mos (IQR 6-36). Ponatinib dose before treatment discontinuation was 15 mg for all but 4 pts: 1 was dose reduced from 45 mg to 30 mg, 1 stayed on 45 mg; 2 pts who had started with 15 mg dose reduced to 15 mg every other day. 11 pts discontinued in MR4, 7 pts in MR4.5 and 1 pt in MR5. Median duration of DMR before discontinuation was 25 mos (IQR 14-37). Reasons for discontinuation were: physician-patient shared choice for 9 pts, intolerance for 6 pts (among whom 1 had pancreatitis, 1 worsening of cardiac heart failure, 1 tachycardia, and 3 low-grade GI symptoms), need to start chemotherapy for a second neoplasia for 2 pts, pregnancy for 1 pt and auto-suspension for 1 pt. Only one pt had a CV adverse event (stroke) during treatment with ponatinib. 16/19 pts maintained TFR for a median time of 19 mos (IQR 8-32) and were still off treatment at the last follow-up. 3 pts had to resume treatment after 3, 4 and 9 mos. All 3 restarted treatment with ponatinib and reobtained DMR. All pts were alive at last follow-up, except for 2 pts who died for a gastric and a lung cancer. Conclusions: Our data confirmed the efficacy of ponatinib in second or later lines of treatment. All pts, including those treated for resistance, achieved optimal responses at 3 mos. We also showed that TFR may be feasible for some pts treated in second or subsequent lines, not only for intolerance. Follow-up time extension and collection of data from additional pts are desired to confirm our observations, and seem to be of utmost importance to better define the characteristics of pts who might benefit from ponatinib with the purpose of TFR attempt.

Treatment-Free Remission after Ponatinib Cessation in Chronic Phase (CP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients. the Ponastop Observational Study

Introduction: Ponatinib has proven its efficacy as salvage therapy for patients intolerant, or resistant (and ABL1T315I+ mutation) to at least 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in CP-CML. Despite the unfavourable profile of such patients, some durable deep molecular response (DMR, i. e. MR 4 and MR4.5) might be observed, and it is arguable to propose a treatment-free remission (TFR) strategy to these patients, despite the fact that this is not currently recommended. The aim of this study is to analyse the results of TFR in CP-CML patients that have received ponatinib as last line of therapy for any reason. Methods: This a retrospective multicentric European analysis of CP-CML patients undergoing ponatinib at any dose for prior TKI-intolerance or -resistance and obtaining at least 2 years of MR4.5, assessed on at least 4 successive samples, and undergoing a treatment-free remission (TFR) procedure and follow-up. All BCR::ABL1 assessments have been performed in ELN reference laboratories and expressed in % on the international scale (IS). Loss of major molecular response (MMR i. e. BCR::ABL1 transcript ≥0.1% IS) on one datapoint was sufficient to consider relapse. Clinical information were extracted from individual patients' files. All patients have given their written agreement in participating to this observational study. Results: Fifteen cases could be collected and analysed with 27% males, 73% females of a median age of 43 (24-79) years at CML diagnosis and of 56 (30-83) at ponatinib cessation. All patients were in CP at diagnosis and at ponatinib cessation. None of these patients were harbouring additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis or beyond. Sokal scores were low in 50%, intermediate in 25% and high in 25% of patients, ELTS scores were low in 64% and intermediate in 36% of patients. None of these patients has undergone allogeneic stem cell transplant. Three patients were ABL1T315I mutated. The median time between CP-CML diagnosis and ponatinib initiation was 52 (1.5-145) months, the median initial dose of ponatinib was 45 mg QD for 12 patients, 30 mg QD for 2 patients and 15 mg QD for 1 patient. One patient had 4 previous lines of TKI prior to ponatinib, 4 patients 3 prior lines, 5 patients 2 prior lines, 4 patients 1 prior line and 1 patient was in ponatinib first-line (EPIC trial). Thirteen arterial events occurred on ponatinib in these 15 patients, all prior to ponatinib cessation. At cessation, the median dose of ponatinib was 30 mg QD for 1 patient, 15 mg QD for 7 patients, 7.5 mg QD for 2 patients, and ≤ 6.4 mg QD for 4 patients. Ten (67%) patients were resistant to prior TKI before ponatinib, 3 were intolerant, 1 intolerant and resistant and 1 was in first-line ponatinib. The median ponatinib treatment duration prior to cessation was 71 (21- 124) months and the time from ponatinib initiation to sustained DMR was 14 (2-112) months. The median follow-up after cessation was 11 (2-55) months. One patient died in TFR of severe SARS-CoV2 lung infection 23 months after cessation. The median survival without MMR loss after ponatinib cessation was 69.26% at 12-months, 24-months and 54-months. Time to MMR-loss KM curve is presented in Figure 1. The four patients loosing MMR after ponatinib cessation resumed low dose ponatinib (≤ 15 mg QD) for 2 and asciminib (80 mg BID) for 2, three patients regained MMR (one non evaluable with too short follow-up). Conclusions: TFR attempt represents a strategy that can be applied to ponatinib patients in the setting of heavily pretreated CP-CML in a similar way as of less advanced CP-CML patients, with high success rates and no disease progression. If those data are confirmed by further studies and longer follow-up, TFR strategies might have to be considered also in previously heavily pre-treated patients.

Final report of TKI discontinuation trial with dasatinib for the second attempt of treatment-free remission after failing the first attempt with imatinib: Treatment-free Remission Accomplished by Dasatinib (TRAD) study.

Multiple studies have reported a significant treatment-free remission (TFR) rate of 50%-60% in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. However, the remaining half of these patients still require re-initiation of TKI therapy for leukaemia control. It remains unclear if TKI drugs should be switched for re-therapy in patients who failed the first TFR (TFR1) attempt. Our study attempted to determine whether dasatinib therapy after TFR1 failure post-imatinib discontinuation could improve the likelihood of TFR2. Of 59 patients who lost molecular response after imatinib discontinuation for TFR1, 55 patients (93.2%) were treated with dasatinib, of whom 49 (89.1%) regained MR4.5 or deeper response, with a median time of 1.85 months to achieve MR4.5. Dasatinib was discontinued in 35 patients for TFR2 attempt, of whom 26 patients (74.28%) lost MMR and 6 (17.14%) MR4. Risk factor analysis for the TFR2 after dasatinib discontinuation suggested three significant factors: (1) doubling time of BCR::ABL1 transcript following TFR1 attempt, (2) rapid regaining of molecular response following dasatinib therapy and (3) undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcript prior to TFR2 attempt. The present study showed that dasatinib does not increase the TFR2 rate in general, but a selected group of patients could benefit from this approach.

Lineage-specific detection of residual disease predicts relapse in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia stopping therapy

AbstractPatients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are eligible for treatment-free remission (TFR) may still relapse after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cessation. There is a need for accurate predictors of outcome to enable patients with a favorable profile to proceed while avoiding futile attempts. Sensitive detection of residual disease in total leukocytes at treatment cessation is associated with relapse but is not highly discriminatory, likely because it is a composite measure of residual leukemia derived from different cell lineages, whereas only some lineages are relevant for relapse. We prospectively measured BCR::ABL1 DNA as a predictive yes/no binary test in 5 cellular fractions from 48 patients meeting conventional criteria for TKI discontinuation. The median BCR::ABL1 DNA level was higher in granulocytes and T cells, but not in other lineages, in patients who relapsed. Among the 40 patients undergoing their first TFR attempt, we defined 3 groups with differing relapse risk: granulocyte-positive group (100%), granulocyte-negative/T-cell–positive group (67%), and granulocyte-negative /T-cell–negative group (25%). These data show the critical importance of lineage-specific assessment of residual disease in the selection of patients who can attempt to achieve TFR with a high expectation of success and, concurrently, defer patients who have a high probability of relapse.

The Success of Treatment Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in Clinical Practice: A Single-Centre Retrospective Experience from South Africa.

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) management has evolved from a disease once considered to be incurable just over 2 decades ago to that of one of a "functional cure" as defined by the sustained molecular response on stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor(TKI) therapy. The next goal of CML management has been treatment-free remission (TFR). The past 4 years have seen much international data on TFR attempts in CML in clinical practice. However, Africa as a continent has lagged behind the rest of the world, in keeping up with the latest trends in CML management, and so this study aims to address this gap by assessing the outcome of TFR in CML in a single centre in South Africa (SA). We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 12 CML patients in the chronic phase to assess the success of TKI discontinuation. The patients were treated in King Edward VIII Hospital (KEH), a tertiary, academic hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and the study period was from June 2020 to May 2022. Patients included had to have been on TKI therapy for a minimum of 5 years and achieved a deep molecular response (DMR) for a minimum period of 3 years. The overall TFR cohort showed a success rate of 75% at a median follow-up of 12 months. All patients who failed TFR, defined as a loss of major molecular remission (MMR), failed within 6 months of stopping TKI therapy. All patients who failed TFR regained DMR after retreatment with TKI, with no disease progression reported. The only factor influencing the success of TFR was the total period of TKI therapy. Despite our study having a small cohort of patients, this study demonstrated that TFR in CML is an attainable goal, even in a resource-limited setting.

Treatment-free remission after dasatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase with deep molecular response: Final 5-year analysis of DASFREE.

Patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who have a sustained deep molecular response (DMR) are eligible to discontinue treatment and attempt treatment-free remission (TFR). In the DASFREE study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01850004), the 2-year TFR rate after dasatinib discontinuation was 46%; here we present the 5-year update. Patients with a stable DMR after ≥2 years of dasatinib therapy discontinued treatment and were followed for 5 years. At a minimum follow-up of 60 months, in 84 patients discontinuing dasatinib, the 5-year TFR rate was 44% (n = 37). No relapses occurred after month 39 and all evaluable patients who relapsed and restarted dasatinib (n = 46) regained a major molecular response in a median of 1.9 months. The most common adverse event during the off-treatment period was arthralgia (18%, 15/84); a total of 15 withdrawal events were reported in nine patients (11%). At the 5-year final follow-up, almost half of the patients who discontinued dasatinib after a sustained DMR maintained TFR. All evaluable patients who experienced a relapse quickly regained a DMR after restarting dasatinib, demonstrating that dasatinib discontinuation is a viable and potentially long-term option in patients with CML-CP. The safety profile is consistent with the previous report.

Long-term outcomes of frontline imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in China.

Imatinib is the first-line therapy recommended for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in China. We reported a long-term follow-up study of patients on imatinib as first-line treatment for chronic phase (CP) CML to provide an important reference for the actual clinical treatment regimen of CML patients in China. We evaluated the long-term efficacy, safety, low-dose attempt after years of treatment, and treatment-free remission (TFR) of 237 CML-CP patients receiving first-line imatinib therapy. The median age was 46 years (interquartile range: 33-55). After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the cumulative complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response (MMR), and MR4.5 rates were 82.6%, 80.4%, and 69.3%, respectively. The 10-year transformation-free, event-free, and failure-free survival rates were 97.3%, 87.2% and 53.5%, respectively. Fifty-two (21.9%) patients with sustained deep molecular response (DMR) were treated with low-dose imatinib after years of imatinib treatment. No significant differences in the 1-year and 2-year molecular relapse-free survival in MMR and MR4 were observed between the standard-dose and low-dose groups. Twenty-eight (11.8%) patients discontinued imatinib, and the median time to maintain DMR before discontinuation was 8.43 years. Thirteen patients (5.5%) remained in TFR for a median of 43.33 months. No patients transformed to accelerate or blast phase or died. No new, late toxicity was observed, and the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (9.3%), anemia (7.6%), thrombocytopenia (6.3%), and rash (4.2%). This study confirmed the long-term efficacy and safety of imatinib for treating Chinese CML patients. Additionally, it demonstrated the feasibility of imatinib dose reduction and TFR attempts in patients with sustained stable DMR after years of imatinib treatment in real-life settings.

Therapy in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Outside of Clinical Trials: Results of the German CML-Registry (CML-VI)

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have significantly improved treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). With the introduction of 2nd and 3rd generation TKI, the options in the management of CML have increased. In clinical trials, 25%-50% of patients do not remain on initial treatment due to intolerance or inefficacy. Information outside of clinical trials is limited. Aim: The aim of this study is to analyze the use of different TKI in first-line treatment and the frequency of TKI switches in CML in real world. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed CML between 1.1.2013 and 31.12.2019 were registered and followed annually up to 31.12.2021. Primary endpoint was the time to and reason for switching of any first-line treatment including treatment free remission (TFR)attempt. Further endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cytogenetic and molecular response. Analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates with SPSS. Results: 540 adult patients have been registered from 91 centers, 512 were evaluable. 281 patients (55%), were treated by resident oncologists, 231 patients (45%) in hospitals including 82 patients (16%) in university hospitals. 271 patients (53%) were male. At diagnosis, median age was 59 (range 16-100) years. The median follow-up was 67 (3-108) months. Information on first-line TKI treatment was available for 480 patients: 203 patients (42%) were treated with imatinib, 137 (29%) with nilotinib and 140 (29%) with dasatinib. TKI switch was reported in 155 cases (31%) after a median of 11 (0-68) months. Reasons for switching was failure in 49 patients (32%), intolerance in 88 patients (57%), and 18 patients (11%) switched TKI because of other reasons (study inclusion, desire to have children, patient request, unknown). 33 patients (7%) switched TKI more than once. 13 (8,4%) of the 155 patients with TKI-switch died during follow-up, whereas only 16 of 325 (4,9%) patients without TKI-switch. OS of patients with TKI-switch was 90%, of patients without TKI-switch 94% after 6 years. TKI stop for more than one month has been reported in 118 patients (24%) due to different reasons (attempt for TFR, intolerance, patient wish, pregnancy). 61 patients (12%) started a TFR attempt after a median of 46 (10-96) months of TKI treatment. Discontinuation criteria were not always met. Only 10 patients (6,5%) with TKI-switch started a TFR attempt compared to 51 patients (16%) who had only been treated with one TKI. 501 patients were in CP at diagnosis, 11 patients in accelerated phase (AP) and 2 patients in blast crisis (BC). Progression occurred in 9 patients (BC n=6, AP n=3) after a median time of 12 (9-22) months. Overall, AP and BC were diagnosed in 22 patients (2,3%). Of the total cohort, 29 patients died, OS was 93% after 6 years. An evaluable cytogenetic examination was carried out in 291 patients (57%) at diagnosis or in the course of disease. No statements can be made about achieving of complete cytogenetic remission as follow up results were only available in 15% and monitoring was carried out using RQ-PCR in most patients. A major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1 <0.1%) was reached by 422 patients (85%), a deep molecular response (defined as BCR::ABL1 ≤0.01) by 365 patients (74%) within the follow-up period. Cumulative incidence calculation and study of patients who lost their MMR are ongoing. There is no information about the molecular status of 18 patients. Conclusion: Results of the CML VI-registry provided information on treatment but also on baseline characteristics and diagnostic parameters of CML patients in real world. The median age of the patients at diagnosis was higher than in other clinical trials. In routine care, data demonstrated high switching rates of first-line treatment and frequent TFR attempts without meeting the guideline criteria. OS rates were as high as in clinical trials and confirm normal life expectation of CML patients. MMR was reached in 85% and DMR in 74% in this population. Progression is rare. In conclusion, the CML-registry offers importing data confirming a good outcome of response and survival for CML patients outside of clinical trials. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Somatic Mutations Are Frequently Detected in CML Patients before Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) Attempt with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Discontinuation but with Uncertain Predictive Value for Tfr Failure

Treatment-free remission (TFR) has been accepted as a practical treatment goal in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. TFR is defined as successful discontinuation (DISC) of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) therapy without losing leukemia control. Multiple clinical studies have reproduced a consistent TFR rate of about 50%. No definite biomarker has been identified or validated yet. Adnan et al (BCJ 2022) recently reported that epigenetic modifier gene mutations at initial diagnosis of CML are associated with TFR success after TKI DISC. The issue is the time gap between mutation profiling at initial diagnosis of CML and the clinical event of a TFR attempt, which is about 5-10 years. Mutation profiles in the samples obtained before TKI DISC have never been investigated as a TFR predictive marker. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been incorporated into clinical practice. Conventional targeted sequencing techniques have limitations such as the high error rate, its limit of detection is up to 2-5%. Mutation frequency and allele frequency (AF) were assumed to be very low in the patients who achieved deep molecular response. Thus, conventional NGS likely misses mutations with low AF. Single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP) is a bar-coded, error-corrected NGS approach, can overcome the high error rate issue by tracking all sequence reads derived from a single strand. This study aims to detect somatic mutations using a smMIP panel to evaluate if the mutations assessed can be a biomarkers for TFR failure. Patients and Methods We applied our in-house CML-specific smMIP panel with a limit of detection up to 0.2%. The panel encompasses 37 genes with 332 amplicon probes: epigenetic modifiers (n=7), activation signaling (n=12), myeloid transcription factor (TF; n=5), spliceosome (n=3), tumor suppressor (n=3), cohesion (n=4) and miscellaneous (n=3). Our cohort included 135 patients who attempted TKI DISC for TFR from 4 countries: Argentina (n=28, 20.7%), Brazil (n=30, 22.2%), Czechia (n=3, 2.2%), Canada (n=34, 54.8%). Disease characteristics and outcomes were evaluated and compared according to the mutation profiles prior to TKI DISC. Molecular relapse-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the date of TKI DISC to the date of confirmed loss of molecular response. An episode of major molecular response (MMR) loss or two consecutive episodes of molecular response loss of 4 logs or deeper response (MR4) constituted molecular relapse. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was used to evaluate RFS and Cox's proportional hazard regression model was applied. Results Median age was 55.5 years (25-72), 55% males, and Sokal Score risks rates were as follows: Low 51.8%, intermediate 26.8%, High 8.33%. All patients were in chronic phase at diagnosis. A total of 102 pts (78%) stopped Imatinib, while 24 pts (22%) stopped 2GTKI: Dasatinib (n=17) and Nilotinib (n=7). There was no difference in RFS between IM DISC vs. 2GTKI DISC: the patients who stopped IM showed RFS rate of 64.3% (40.9-80.4%) vs those who stopped 2GTKI showed 58% (48.5-67.7%; p=0.634). A total of 59 mutations were detected in 43 (31.9%) patients. TET2 was the most commonly mutated gene (n=15, 11.1%) followed by ASXL1 (n=10, 7.4%) and, DNMT3A (n=9, 6.7%). According to its biologic pathways of the mutation, mutations were detected in the Epigenetic modifiers (n=33, 56%) most frequently, followed by Cohesin (n=16, 27%), activated signaling (n=7, 12%), tumor suppressor (n=3, 5%) and splicing (n=1, 2%). According to the mutational profile before TKI DISC for the TFR attempt, no difference in RFS was observed according to the biological pathways of mutations or according to the presence of mutation (fig 1). Overall RFS at 1 year was 56% (95% CI [45.1-66.1%]) in patients without any mutations comparing to 67.5% (50.7-79.7%) in patients with mutation(s) (p=0.49; fig 2). The RFS rate at 1 year was 58.9% (48.3-68%) in patients with epigenetic mutations compared to 63.3% (43.6.-78.7%) in those without it (p=0.73). Even after adjustment for MR4 duration, we could not identify any predictive profile of RFS. Conclusion Somatic mutations were not infrequently detected in the patients qualified for TFR attempt using a technique detecting up to 0.2% VAF. Mutations in epigenetic genes were most frequently detected. However, it does not seem to have any predictive power for TFR success. Its biological relevance remains to be further investigated in future research. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Asciminib (ABL001) Plus Imatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) Patients Who Relapsed after a Prior Attempt at TKI Discontinuation-H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium Study

Successful tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation is currently one of the main goals of CML therapy. Patients who are in sustained deep molecular remission can attempt TKI discontinuation; approximately 50% of such patients will achieve a successful treatment free remission (TFR) and the other 50% will have molecular recurrence , warranting reinitiation of TKI therapy. Molecular recurrence is defined as loss of major molecular response (BCR-ABL1 International Scale ratio >0.1%) . With a goal to increase the ultimate fraction of successful TFR, inquiry has begun into the rate and optimal approach to TFR after a second attempt at TKI discontinuation in patients with molecular recurrence after their first attempt. Molecular recurrence, is suspected to be driven by CML progenitor element(s) capable of, permitted to, and/or signaled to proliferate; different approaches to eradicate such a compartment have been proposed. One such potential means may be through alternative and synergistic BCR::ABL1 inhibition with the allosteric inhibitor asciminib in combination with approved TKIs for CML. Asciminib is a potent BCR::ABL1 inhibitor with a novel, allosteric mode of action. The activity of asciminib is a result of its ability to bind a vacant pocket on the kinase domain that is normally occupied by the myristoylated N-terminus of ABL, a negative regulatory element lost upon the fusion of ABL to BCR. Asciminib has an excellent selectivity profile, is several-fold more potent than current approved TKIs such as nilotinib, and in vitro was active in the low nanomolar range against a spectrum of clinically observed ATP site mutations. Asciminib demonstrated efficacy in phase I studies in resistant/intolerant chronic and accelerated phase CML, including T315I mutation positive and ponatinib pretreated patients. In a phase III trial, asciminib was more active than bosutinib in a phase III trial in patients who had received 2 prior TKIs Our primary objective in this study is to determine the 1-year TFR rate after 12 months of combination therapy with imatinib plus asciminib, followed by treatment cessation, in subjects who have previously had molecular recurrence first TFR attempt. This is a single arm phase II study that will enroll a maximum of 51 patients (NCT04838041). All subjects will have a confirmed diagnosis of CML-CP. Each subject must have previously attempted to discontinue imatinib, and were restarted on imatinib at the time of molecular recurrence in order to be eligible for this trial. This trial will use asciminib 40 mg PO daily plus imatinib at a maximum dose of 400 mg PO once daily in the combination treatment phase of this trial. All eligible subjects will be treated with asciminib and imatinib on cycle 1 day 1 of the combination therapy phase. Patients will remain on imatinib for 12 cycles. RQ-PCR to measure BCR::ABL1 transcripts in the peripheral blood at screening and at specific time points during the first 12 cycles on trial (combination therapy phase). At the end of 12 cycles, asciminib and imatinib will be discontinued in any subject who has continued in stable deep remission and thus meets criteria for TFR. This study will assess a wide range of PROs before and after stopping imatinib. These will be done in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing, though at fewer time points, utilizing online and/or phone questionnaires. The alternative hypothesis of relapse rate after second discontinuation of TKI combination treatment is 35% will be tested against a one-sided alternative of historical control of 55% relapse rate. Simon's two-stage admissible design will be used. The null hypothesis that the true TFR rate (no loss of MMR) is 45% will be tested against a one-sided alternative. In the first stage 29 patients will be accrued. If there are 15 patients or fewer who maintain TFR in these 29 patients, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 18 additional patients will be accrued for a total of 47. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 27 or more patients maintain TFR in 47 patients. This design yields a type I error rate of 5% and power of 85% when the true TFR rate is 65%. To account for a potential dropout rate of 8% due to adverse events or loss of response, 51 patients will be enrolled to achieve the 47 patients needed.

Clonal Hematopoiesis Detected at the Time of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cessation Is Associated with Delayed Molecular Recurrence after Treatment-Free Remission in Patients with CML

Background Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a goal of therapy. However, ~50% of patients who attempt TFR will relapse, which mostly occurs by 6 months. The acquisition of somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells is common with age (clonal hematopoiesis, CH). Through next-generation sequencing studies we identified CH in patients in deep molecular remission. CH variants provide a selective growth advantage to cells, driving their clonal expansion. The clones also give rise to mutated immune effector cells with a proinflammatory profile that exacerbate diseases with a chronic inflammatory component, such as atherosclerosis. CH variants could potentially influence TFR, either by outcompeting an emerging residual CML clone or by altering immune function, which is known to play an important role in TFR. Aim To determine whether CH variants present at the time of therapy cessation could influence TFR. Methods An RNA-based hybridization capture sequencing method targeting 17 of the most frequently mutated CH genes was developed and applied to samples of 138 patients who attempted TFR. CH variants met strict criteria for pathogenicity based on their potential to confer growth and survival advantages. The CH status was confirmed by repeat testing of samples of 28 patients. The method reproducibly detected variants with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of ≥0.4%. Results The median follow-up for the 138 patients was 66 months from the TFR attempt. Molecular recurrence was defined as loss of major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1 ≤0.1%). The probability of TFR was 64.5% at 6 months, 59.4% at 12 months and 51.0% at 84 months. CH variants were detected in 61/138 patients (44%): 107 variants in 12 genes. Multiple variants, range 2 - 7, were detected in 26 patients (19%). The median VAF was 0.9%, range 0.4 - 44%. Variants most frequently occurred in TET2 (44% of variants), DNMT3A (25%), PPM1D (7.4%) and ASXL1 (6.5%). The average age at cessation was 59.6 years, range 33 - 85. The average age of patients with CH was higher than those without CH: 64.7 versus 55.5 years, P < .0001. Only 3/13 patients (15%) aged ≤40 had CH compared with 6/7 patients (86%) ≥80. CH was significantly associated with TFR to 36 months after cessation. The optimal criteria for TFR prediction were at least one CH variant of VAF >2% or >2 variants (CH >2%/>2). Thirty-one of 138 patients (22%) had CH of VAF >2% (n = 24) or >2 variants (n = 7). The probability of TFR for these 31 patients was significantly higher than for the remaining patients when assessed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after cessation, Figure. The probability of TFR at 6 months was 90.3% for patients with CH >2%/>2 versus 57.0% for the remaining patients, P = .001. The probability of TFR at 36 months was 65.9% versus 51.2%, P = .049. A landmark analysis was performed at 12 months for the 74 patients who maintained TFR at 12 months. MMR was subsequently lost in 8/74 patients and the probability of TFR at 84 months was 86.9%. CH >2%/>2 occurred for 23/74 patients (31%). The probability of late molecular recurrence was higher among the patients with CH >2%/>2: 27.3% versus 5.5% for the remaining patients, P = .009. Overall, molecular recurrence occurred for 12/31 patients (39%) with CH >2%/>2 and 53/107 of remaining patients (50%). Time to molecular recurrence after cessation was longer for patients with CH >2%/>2 than the remaining patients: median 12.5 months versus 3.5 months, P < .0001. The longer time to molecular recurrence was linked to a different pattern of loss of MMR. The median time between first loss of MR4 (BCR::ABL1 ≤0.01%) and loss of MMR was 145 days for patients with CH >2%/>2 and 28 days for remaining patients, P = .0007. BCR::ABL1 values more frequently fluctuated before loss of MMR in patients with CH >2%/>2: 8/12 patients (67%, fluctuation over 120-1335 days) versus 6/53 (11%, fluctuation over 85-715 days) in the remaining patients, P =.016. Conclusion CH may improve the probability and duration of TFR, delaying the time to molecular recurrence, which has implications for patient selection and monitoring. Patients with CH who are eligible for therapy cessation have an excellent prospect of remaining drug-free for 1-2 years but their long term prospects of sustained TFR may be less certain compared to other patients, given the slower dynamics of relapse. Delayed relapse could be due to competition for clonal dominance between residual leukemic cells and larger CH clones, or modulation of the immune microenvironment. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal